mbeh mata, mata, mata, oh mata, mata, mata.

here’s the thing, when a person begins to work at a high level, energetic, vibrational, here we can say that such a person begins to make art for the elite, the next number in our program is snabbism, contempt for the audience, this is, well, i notice for myself, what can i do, well, i notice, my dear, but there’s no need to beat yourself up, is it better? then tell me this: what would you like

my friend the tv viewer to do, it’s better to say so, how would you like him to listened to your work , what should he meditate, what should he do, what should he do, he shouldn’t do anything, firstly, so, secondly, everyone can, listening to our music, find themselves, find their own, let’s put it this way, yours, please tell me which songs, do you know exactly, oh, these are mine, well , first of all, we have bad advice, do we even have a chat? there is one like this, right now we have one in the draft already, the bulgarian yovannu and yovannu, yovanke, i don’t remember the words, but comrade, you have to realize that the bulgarian melos, there are turkish polyrhythms, slavic polyphony, it turns out fantastic , polyrhythmic, folk, but you

won’t play this, i have no completed musical education at all, so i know, i like it, i don’t like it when someone says soti, that’s wrong, you’re in the wrong place now, i i say , i don’t care, i like it, and we live like this, we have heated debates, of course, we are looking, i think that we will still polish ourselves, when you make this kind of music, i think another french proverb suits you : by doing blacksmithing, little by little you become blacksmith. it seems to me that you are forced to deal with mantras, and therefore with vibrations , which means you will be forced to deal with high, well, let me tell you, the planes of the universe, the astral plane, for example, and i want to assure you that you were in lhasa, in the himalayas in a few days, i will go again, no, not nepal, just the himalayas, now to kidernat, yamunotri, gangotri, reshukesh - all these himalayan places. and temples and places of power

, multiple visits to india, in general, india is not like me in india, india is in me, and the himalayas are in me, well, now what are we going to listen to? mantra. what should my viewer understand about this? imagine that there is a mantra wrapped in music, but even if you somehow don’t like it, it’s boring or it’s incomprehensible, it doesn’t matter at all, enjoy the music, and what’s behind it, maybe you’ll get through, let’s listen , let's.

​ला गिरिदार

श्रीీला गिरिधारी परभ्रमने नमः शरीव िताला गिरीधारी. parabramane nmh, vista lá,

bitta. dividalah giridhaari para bramenena maha, sri vitala giridhaharina amahar, vitalal.

when was i almost 20 years ago coming to on the first channel, of course, a factory of stars, i didn’t think that this beauty would come to such

complex conclusions, this is very cool, this is the very drama that i promised you, now the next question from our viewers is finally, where to find you , you give concerts, and more and more to our joy, this summer we are performing at the wild mint festival, a number of ethnic festivals in yarsky there will be a festival near st. petersburg, a whole movement we have such an ethnic festival and well, well, the same wild mint us calling more as representatives of electronic music, we are closing as headliners one of the evenings on the electronic stage, which is also a great joy for us, our big solo concert will be in november, november 15, and in moscow in one of the large concert halls. you know, i really love matviyanka nogorek or jazzrok himself. listens, he loves fusion, and mahavishna too , he knows it by heart, you know, that’s how

factory girls are, that’s his, that’s pashka, what were you singing there, pashka, i love you, but i won’t get married, that’s right, that’s right, and i didn’t , you know, with on the other hand, that we will curse each other, well, all’s well that ends well, but this is not the end, on the contrary, only apparently the beginning of a new interesting path, dear friends, thank you very much for your attention, i leave you alone with a new sati casanova and the group, what should we call the group? sati ethnicity , sati ethnicity, that’s what it’s called, okay, ethnicity articles , thank you for your attention, see you again, all the best, krishna,

keešava mana mohana, hej prabu, hej, prabu,

išvara, mano суdagna, svojambu, swajamu . गिरिधारी गोपाल, गिरिधारी गोपाल, हे गोपाल, हे गो पाल,

गिरिदारको पाला, गिरिदारको पाला, गिरिधर को पाला. dialogue with the whole country, dialogue with everyone, results of the year with vladimir putin on december 14 at

12:00 moscow time. the topic we have today is serfdom, well, at first glance, purely internal affairs, but remembering klyuchevsky, who said that russia fell behind the west precisely by serfdom, that is, how cevsky calculated i don’t know how by 2 from 2 centuries the topic is of course directly related to the west, because everything in general in our relations with the west depended on this lag, so of course we need to talk about this too, and when russia got rid of serfdom, it actually began to move closer to the west, switching to capitalist rails,

and this was actually discussed then wrote that russia had finally gotten rid of slavery, but serfdom was called slavery, even officially. documents, of course, hello, this is a historical podcast, russia and the west on the swing of history, pyotr romanov and sergey solovyov are with you, today we will deal with serfdom and its abolition, the impetus for which was also given from the west as a result of the crimean war. where serfdom actually begins in russia, the most interesting thing here is precisely that when serfdom begins to develop in russia, it begins to disappear in the west. gradually fade away. we have the first mention of the restriction of the exit of christ on st. george's day - this is the week before, the week after november 26, according to the old style, this is the code of law of 1497, that is, ivan ii. in fact, the first mention in others documents, also under the reign of ivan ii , belong to an earlier period. this was also confirmed by the legal code of 1550 under ivan

the terrible. we know that in 1581, as a result of the unsuccessful livonian war of attrition , a temporary ban on going out to yuri per day was introduced from the country, but there is nothing more permanent than temporary, and this ban turned into a permanent one, we record this in 1597 , when a five-year period for searching fugitives is introduced, it is interesting that in soviet times it was somehow not customary to talk about this in detail, so why, it seemed that somehow russia, without a special decree, had come to terms with serfdom, so a number of historians believed that there was a special decree: 5 years before the introduction of the five-year cap for runaways in 1592 there was a special decree, but there are still traces of this decree since not found, a search for fugitives was introduced, then boris godunov temporarily... loosens the noose and allows exit to yuri on the day, why the famine of 1601, a monstrous famine, he allows exit. vasily shuisky in 1607 again raised

the term for searching fugitives to 15 years, yes, then after the troubles, mikhail fedorovich again repeated the five-year investigation; in 1637 , a nine-year investigation was introduced; in the forty-first, a ten-year or even fifteen-year investigation, if one landowner took the peasants away from... the landowner; finally , an indefinite investigation of serf peasants was introduced into the cathedral code. why is this happening in russia at this time? when they talk about the second edition of serfdom, this is a historical term, it occurs where the first edition actually did not exist. and there is one, who, unfortunately, is no longer alive, was a sociologist, historian emmanul wallerstein, who said that on the periphery of western europe, in eastern europe, east of the elbe, it was there that the reason for the emergence of serfdom was first formulated : forced labor for the market, because the division with the economic occurred,

eastern europe supplies western europe with bread, where is the industry developing? it’s interesting that in general they thought about the ineffectiveness of serfdom, even under anna ioanovna, given... well, the fantastic inactivity of that era, they gave her some notes on the abolition of serfdom, i think that this is a purely economic problem, we need to deal with it somehow, that a free peasant will work more efficiently, well, naturally, anna ianovna, she did not answer smaller questions, so to speak, the requirements ... of time, they later joined , well, let’s put it this way, discussions about the immorality of serfdom , the influence in many ways of french philosophy, well

, jean-jacques rousseau and so on, in general , a small but layer of freethinkers appeared who began to say that, in general, this is not only ineffective, but also, so to speak, against conscience. so many people thought about it, well, the masons, for example, also thought about it, by the way, they thought that in general it would be very good, and some even freed their peasants altogether, but at the same time they said that strictly speaking, not the peasant, not society itself is not ready for this, as far as i remember, they gave such a parallel, so... and

there is frost and hunger, then she will die, therefore , and society should be cleaner, because otherwise, she is this unfortunate peasant who will be released into this dirty society, it will simply corrupt him or ruin him, so to speak, so we must wait, but we must wait, this discussion is about whether serfdom should be abolished or not yet time, it lasted for a very, very long time in russia, catherine’s order to the legislative commission, yes, we have the year 67, 1767 , catherine ii uses the order in relation to serfdom, the phrase serfdom itself only appeared for the first time then, but it mentions also slavery. calls serfdom itself slavery, proposes to abolish how the nobility reacts to this, my god, in no case, when catherine saw a similar reaction, of course, from similar ideas,

educational ideas, she was brought up on the ideals of enlightenment, corresponded and met with dedro, corresponded with walter, bought voltaire’s library and so on, nevertheless, catherine did not slowly abandon these plans, well, when they discussed the famous order, right? when a question suddenly arose, they discussed it very freely, i must say, that catherine gave the opportunity to discuss any issues, and even asked to bring all sorts of orders from the provinces and so on, that is, this was, well, probably the first in our history, a really meticulous analysis, so to speak, of the situation, during the discussion of this order, when arose the topic of emancipation of the peasants, the conversation instantly went astray to the completely opposite side, they asked, so to speak, to allow them to have serfs, merchants, cossacks, there is

an additional church there though... and so on, that is, catherine perfectly understood that well, she still she felt like she wasn’t quite a russian empress, and this, of course, also had an effect, she behaved very carefully, and in general she believed that her phrase, no matter what we did, everything that i won’t do is a drop in the ocean in russia, so to speak , so it’s very difficult to change something, russia is not ready. he acted , so to speak, for a very long time, and under catherine herself, serfdom only became stricter, it was forbidden for serfs to complain about landowners, besides, under catherine, yes, serfs can be given up as soldiers at the request of the landowner, this is a punitive measure, you can exile to siberia the most violent ones at the request of the landowner, that is, without an appropriate court decision, in fact, this was also under catherine, that is , truly the golden age of serfdom, under her, moreover, they are often accused...

of the course of serfdom of peter ii without the lands of serfs first began to be sold under fyodor alekseevich, again under his predecessor, not immediately after the cathedral code, a little later, a generation later, just in the seventies and early eighties of the 16th century, and this continues in the xvi, russian newspapers under catherine advertised the sale of serfs without land, and this is really such semi-slavery, in fact, the first one who tries to touch this, yes, symbolically. to pavel , of course, yes, pavel, and, well, that is, he was the first to invade such a forbidden zone, yes, although, well , pavel had a lot of things, he tried to fight inflation and so on, uh, mythologized, by the way, very figure, it would also be very interesting to talk about personality, it was such a quixote, that’s what would have happened in spain if donquixote came to power, how many mills he would

destroy, so to speak, and so on. here is pavel, roughly our don quixote, although he was caricatured for, among other things, his attempt to touch upon the christian question. pavel tried, well, first of all, he didn’t really have the time, and indeed the measures that he proposed, they were, so to speak, largely utopian for that time, then alexander ii, you already mentioned this, finally, nicholas ii also believed that serfdom, he said that i don’t understand at all how it happened, what so to speak, they became slaves, but at the same time he also perfectly understood that touching on this topic was a dangerous matter, steps were taken, paul was the first, first of all, forced the peasants to take the oath, that is, for the first time the peasants were some kind of slaves who could be exiled , about which it is forbidden to complain, because the story, remember, of the famous saltychikha, who mocked

the christians, was eventually exiled. this is why they deprived the rights of the state? because other landowners reported on her, fearing that when the godparents came to slaughter her, brought already to the point of complete despair with the perverted tortures that she carried out, they will also be cut, yes, but not because the christians said something, paul i gives them the opportunity to take the oath and he is trying to reduce the corvee, he issues a decree on a three-day corvee, which, of course, as we understand, alexander i’s decree on free lovers remained on paper. yes, when it is possible to release the serfs, an interesting story, in my opinion, is about sheremetyev, one of the richest people in russia, according to the decree on freedom for the farmers, which means a peasant comes to him, a capitalist peasant , who himself already has a business, as we would now say, who is wealthy, thumps at his feet there, i don’t remember how much it is, 10,000 rubles, a gigantic sum at that time, let the priest go free, he says, yes, i’ll have your money don’t need it, i have a reception, give me an oyster in the winter, if it’s

already there. on carts, where oysters were transported in heated barrels, almost from italy, these oysters were brought, and the shremetevs received freedom, in general this is a wonderful exchange, barter, freedom on an oyster, brilliantly, in russia there are only two classes, slaves, the sovereign, the autocrat and the slaves of the farmers. now, the only free people in russia can be beggars and philosophers. spiransky said this , i want to insert one more detail here, serfdom is primarily central russia, because speaking of alexander ii, we were already poland, there was finland, there were, that is, the core of serfdom is central russia, in the west and in asian, so to speak, additions to russia and even some national ones. so

when we just need this little note, when we say serf russia, you still need to imagine this geography, i went on an experiment, he abolished serfdom in the baltic provinces of iceland or ifland, he abolished it, and many then hoped that he had abolished it, this was a rehearsal, and then there will be abolition in russia, yes, but no, yes, but no, which prompted the abolition of serfdom, finally, because nicholas was the first to really understand, he said that serfdom was evil, absolutely right, but abolishing it would be even greater evil, he is afraid of revolution, but attempts to contain the revolution ultimately led russia to a severe defeat. in the crimean war, russia has not lost a war on its territory since peter i. whoever loses the war there, and loses the war, everyone understands this in russia then because of serfdom. alexander ii, the future tsar-liberator, sitting on these very secret committees,

sometimes took more conservative positions than his father. he was not at all brought up as a reformer, but after the disaster, if you call a spade a spade for the then russia crimean war, russia loses to whom? france with modern weapons, with factory production, yes, russian infantry is killed by rifle fire at those distances at which it cannot approach for its effective fire, respectively, the british and french have steamships, the well-known story is the battle of sinop, nakhimov destroys the turkish fleet, sank the turkish fleet, and with turkish coastal batteries, one ship was saved, an english steamer flying the turkish flag, yes, it must be cancelled, yes yes, well, you said that they were afraid of the revolution, that’s all true, and alexander ii, when he was forced after the crimean war to undertake all sorts of reforms , and when we talk about serfdom,

about the abolition of serfdom, we still need to understand that in itself, i don’t know, any decree, any order, there, go to freedom, something like that didn’t work, so we worked for a very long time, working out the technology of all this and it was impossible to just take and let the peasants go, we still had to do something with these new free people, we had to help them , on the one hand, with on the other hand was the concern of the landowners themselves , they cared about their own safety, so when we talk about great reforms, the abolition of serfdom in 1806, this is only part of all these reforms, well, in general , in short, this is a complex of reforms, so when we talk about reform, the abolition of serfdom, everything must be supplemented, including glasnost, it was not under gorbachev that the word appeared, the brother of alexander ii, konstantin, who

led and restored the russian fleet after the crimean war, he wrote about the need glasnost in his department , in order to solve the problems of restoring this fleet , again, really from this failure, the impetus was, of course, of course, first of all, why in order to raise the industry, especially the military, free labor is needed, for in the west , serfdom, which was finally finished off by the napoleonic wars, there it did not imply ownership of the personality of the peasant himself, and the peasants could still leave and become workers in the first manufactories, then factories, and so on, in our country the situation is different, in general capitalism develops in the presence of three conditions, and three markets. capital market, availability of free capital, labor market and sales market. in russia, the problems with all these three things, free working hands, serfs , the sales market, the purchasing power of the same serfs is minimal, accordingly,

the main source of capital, the merchant class is too small - this is the state, it was the state that should have given this impetus and should have these giant transformations run, you are absolutely right that the cancellation serfdom is a huge, but the first step , then it was necessary to reform the entire building of the russian empire, which happens during the great reforms, the extraordinary adventures of experts in the winter series of games, tomorrow after the program it’s time, and it’s not customary for the kazakhs to speak badly when visiting, but sing, but you can sing, the song is about why all russians go on vacation to svetlogor. there ’s nowhere to go, uh, there’s lithuania, guys, the music festival is loud kivin, next saturday, on the first, unfortunately,