we feel a sense of pride in the efforts that are being made on the battlefields, but i would like to say that this is all the more important because this is still happening against the backdrop of the ukrainian counter-offensive, colossal... colossal supplies of weapons to the ukrainian regime, colossal financial support, political, ideological, and despite all these efforts, our troops, on the contrary, show not just heroism, a systematic approach to the implementation of the tasks set under our president on the battlefield, and this is in contrast, of course, it evokes even more admiration and inspires healthy optimism regarding the tasks that have to be... solved in

the near future. we will talk about the war in ukraine later, but you are absolutely right when you reminded that, in general, the war that russia is waging in ukraine is a war in ukraine against the ukrainian armed forces. but, of course, more broadly, this is a military conflict with the west. 54 countries are involved in arming ukraine, and moreover, more and more foreign ones are there.

stand and even move forward, but i'm straight i will say that in the west very, very few people expected this, well, this is how it is happening, and i think that there is every reason to think that this will continue to happen, only on a large scale, because the results, the pace of the russian defense industry are increasing industry, western supplies to ukraine are planning...

complete chaos of unjust indignation, and i want to start with the question, did someone at least somehow explain to you, what was all this for? good evening, good evening to you and your

guests, no, no one has ever explained to me, on the contrary, there have been very vile images in the press, and i can.

thank you, they really look irrational and, being in moscow, it is not always easy for me to understand what they are doing, and most importantly, what they mean. this is how to understand the austrian position on ukraine's accession to the european union. there are all kinds of comments about this in the western press, the last thing i heard was that.

the only ones who hold on to their position are the hungarians, our neighbors. and the situation in ukraine, in donbass, in the east.

300 years ago, and history. it was a dispute between the habsburgs and the romanovs over spheres of influence. it was also

a conflict between the catholic and orthodox churches over religious spheres of influence. therefore, of course, there is great skepticism, which results in russophobia, which results in very deep skepticism about russia and. all this takes us back to the 19th century, the habsburgs, when vienna was, one might say, the sponsor, the creator of ukrainian nationalism, and if we talk about bandera, then in fact in 29 there was already a connection with vienna, and we can say that this is the nationalist perception in ukraine, this nationalism, let’s name things.

public opinion, which is different here, there are various initiatives from the military, high-ranking, scientists, diplomats, former and current, i would say this is a very interesting question, even intriguing, because austria was not only created from the point of view of mentality. with germany, this is the question

of neutrality in this case, this is a question of a number of generations that have been discussed for a long time, because neutrality means distance, means prosperity and also means that we can be the center of international organizations, and i would say that in recent years it has been...

a center, being a place where international organizations are located is very important, you need to keep your distance, you need to follow humanitarian law, international law, it was there that a lot of things were created, and you know, this is also part of the laws that...

thank you very much, we are very grateful that you found time during your trips, we hope to see you again soon on our air. thank you, goodbye, well, we heard that there are countries in europe that still maintain their neutrality, it seems that no one is in a hurry to invade them on this matter, but of course, in my opinion, it is no longer possible to talk about complete neutrality of either austria or switzerland, what do you think about this, koren chakhnazarov? i

think yes, i think it's a question of sovereignty. very conditional today in austria and switzerland and i admit that they may still be put under pressure and they will get in, they will become, they will also join nato, i think that this is quite possible, another question is that i think maybe to be, you know, because, remember, in the second world war, for hitler it was not a problem for switzerland there. occupy , but he did not do this, because it was beneficial for him , there were masses of channels through switzerland that they used for reconnaissance, for various of these, so it is quite possible, in this sense, switzerland could be left alone, maybe austria, but they will still work on a common topic, they, they will still be in nato, i think they

are actually working completely within the nato system now and they do everything, well, they render austria renders.

we have these forever, then i remembered this story with the pandemic, i remembered all the conversations in which i also participated and said that the world has changed forever, the pandemic has changed the world, it will be different, suddenly i see, nothing has changed at all , as the world was after the pandemic, so it remains, this is the logic

of these events, it seems to me that this is exactly the opposite, the pandemic, in theory, was supposed to unite the world. everything remained as it was, well, everything remained as it was, yes, well, everyone was talking about that the world will be different, that’s right , it was, there were these conversations, but it didn’t become different, we always start from the past, the thing is that this conflict is still something new, of course, there can be some - historical parallels, to say, well , look at how the military operations are going, it seems to be the same, but this is a big one, but it is clear that this war is going on completely new rules, completely different, completely new... unknown for us, in general, this war is unique, because there is colossal economic pressure in it, it really is what is called hybrid, but we have not encountered this, but i am beginning to assume that if this conflict is resolved, that is , we will not forget, we will not forgive, it will not, no, well

, it will , we will not forget, we will not forgive, but it seems to me this can all very quickly return to normal, it is clear that our conflict with the west, it is constant, then we gain the upper hand, then they, it is unlikely that we will be able to defeat the west, such a task is not worth it, they will not be able to defeat us, but in in this case, with some success of ours, and i think that he obviously it will be, and we hope for all this, they will pretend that they will forgive, and we, too, apparently, will find some. to find some reasons too, it turns out like the proverbs from the times of brezhnev, they pretend that they pay us, and we pretend that we work for them. i had such thoughts, although i repeat, some time ago i also thought that everything was over, this was forever, and we would never be this, then i remembered the whole history of the world, i thought, no,

everything has always stuck together somehow and as the saying goes, again, everything started all over again, so i think that this friend of yours or whoever he is to you, he is , in principle, purely a colleague, well, this is this colleague, he seems to be right, he seems to be. a very serious cooling of relations with the west that existed. 1982-1983, deployment of medium-range missiles, it was a very alarming moment, it was, well, very close to

such a forceful clarification of relations, well , that then gave way to an unprecedented detente, conditions were simply created for this, conditions created in the west then came to the conclusion not out of love, of course, for the soviet union.

they will replace this kind of forceful pressure with some other methods, which , by the way, this will not mean that we defeated them, it will mean that they have changed the record, they will fight us with other, other options, then we don’t need to wax poetic and say that that’s it, we all are the end of history, there is such an expression, the end of history in the nineties they said that this seems to be a liberal model, it wins, if we now have a liberal model a little bit so to speak. we are blaming the corner somewhere, we also need to not rush to say that that’s it , and this is also the end of history, but the development of the historical historical process turns out to be much more complex, each

system has very powerful hidden possibilities of adaptation and adaptation, i think that we will win, and this will force the west to adapt to new conditions and, apparently, they will lower the temperature. such an open military confrontation. alexander mikhailovich, what do you think, i would be especially interested hear your opinion, not about what they will decide in the west, this is how russia will react when this conflict is completed one way or another. i would like to offer a slightly different point of view, related to the fact that this conflict, at least in relation to us, is leading to... well, tectonic changes, russia is becoming different, which we ourselves do not yet fully know , the president is talking about this, that we need to work a lot more on the economy, on ideology,

there is, there is something to work on, but what russia has lost its naive view of what the west was like and its attitude towards russia, definitely, if russia is different, then definitely, russia’s views on internal processes and, as a result, external ones will also change, for us europe will also be different, comes from the americans , it has spread not only in relation to us, but in relation to europe. accordingly, views will change in this direction. regarding your question, i'm grateful because. it is indeed the events taking place within the country that are the key to what the new one will be like world, and today we say that russia, turning into a new center of world influence,

which is not isolated, which will... be ready to accept many other countries under its protection, under its guardianship, for cooperation, is turning russia into something completely different education, which assumes that we will look differently at the formation of participation in the financial system, we will participate differently, in economic, in logistics, in infrastructural areas that are developing in the world today, but most importantly, what we are losing - this is naive views on economic processes on... on us from the west, that is, on liberal views, and we move on to the understanding that sovereignty, final sovereignty, economic, financial, it lies at the basis of ours, our victory, including at the front, and this economic sovereignty is forged in our own country, with our own efforts, for now with the hands of the government, with participation , of course, under the control of the president, but unfortunately not by everyone yet, and here too there will be a long struggle. in 1983 the situation was very dangerous, i

was in washington.

this cannot be forgiven, everything can be forgiven, but for some reason i think that in order to return to the trust that was felt in russia, including in the russian ruling circles, in the collective west, it seems to me that simply by signing some kind of that agreement, we will not get out of this situation so easily, i will add that my personal

opinion...

they were encouraged in this, they were armed, and russia at some stage decided that this could no longer be allowed, but it seems to me that then this conflict acquired a new quality, when the whole west, just like that, if you like, rushed into a crusade against russia, i read that the western press, as they explain to, say, great britain, why russia cannot be allowed to win, it turns out

that it is impossible. russia’s victory is for a very serious reason, because russia’s victory cannot be allowed, that is, there is no need to explain which ones are real. but if i'm wrong, it seems to me that they in the west are raising the stakes all the time, every time it turns out that they are not achieving the results that they hoped for, according to at least until now, their instinct

is not to say, okay, yours took it, or at least ours didn’t take it, let’s try to come to an agreement, instead i only hear, since it didn’t work, it means we didn’t do enough. negative hero, it doesn’t matter, but you still need to understand, in this sense, if you try to put yourself in the place of the west, well , there is logic in their actions in their position , they are mortally afraid of russia, they are mortally afraid of russia, they are for them, for them and for them

, in general, memories of the ussr, i came across this, talked to the nicest people french, british, for them memories of the ussr.

then they will resign themselves for some period, but this again, this will be temporary, which is why i said in the previous part that this is temporary, perhaps on both sides there will be some kind of warming again, as it has always been, but this is only a stage, as soon as they feel that russia is becoming super big, beyond that, this is an absolutely unacceptable situation for them, they always see it as a threat to their interests. and they have this logic, as they say, but this is their logic, for us it is incomprehensible, but we need to put ourselves in their place, then we will understand a little of them, in this sense, the last thing

i want to say is that they will go to the end until they get punched in the teeth, so they will go to the end, only if they get hit in the teeth in one form or another, not necessarily even in direct form, but in ukraine they will lose, lose. for some time, yes, in russia, mind you, they will retreat for some time, they will always repeat the same mistakes, always, this has always been the case, and that russia does not i knew what they did to her after the seventeenth year, intervention, it was all that happened, robbery, and that this did not stop us from doing the same thing again in the nineties, well, unfortunately, we are also repeating these.

there is an economic one, they cannot accept this position, therefore, when you talk about what the reason was, i develop your idea, i say that our president addressed them, he said, listen, well, you will stop someday in its own in its expansion of nato, because you perceive us as a country that is unable to respond for this expansion, and in violation of all not only agreements, even logical processes. i myself personally spoke there at one time with the minister of defense of the czech republic, who , telling why it is necessary to install a radar facility in the czech republic, which actually monitors russia, in response to his call that it would be necessary to monitor iran, he said when the will look to russia, we will turn off this station. well, you know, this is a conversation of such a not

entirely healthy person, he talked about that they did not perceive us, and today they suddenly saw that russia, with its actions , violates their logic of existence, they are looking for this and it shocked them, yes, they are looking for a way out, and cannot find it, we are leaving for advertising and will be back in just a few minutes how did an american nurse become a pilot? and where is the weather, why are there such bright rays of the sun, the greenery below is visible, they are trying to stimulate or motivate women to go to war, plus this is an f16 aircraft, which are not yet used on the territory of ukraine, constant vera prodigies, now i will give you a miracle weapon and with the help of it you will already win there, how much nato equipment is left in ukraine, to say that 95% of the equipment is in service, i think this is a lie, not everything ends up on the internet, but a lot falls, if you record it in... what i see, there’s generally 20 percent there, god willing, there’s some left, anti-fake,

premiere, tomorrow on the first, monte shococa cognac, a product of the stellar group, our man is beautiful primarily for his inner content, surgery is contraindicated for you , period, lyusya, show the patient, you understand, that the operation won’t help you anyway, huh? what are you doing? out of the operating room? what did you do with her? you can't get away with it? you on the phone? it's not just a call, it's from there! will you ruin my institute? he threw off the preobrazhensky position, why did you get him like that? will you come with us, we are interested in the documentation of the cosmetology department? well, why are they taking him away? holy prostate? yes, they don’t open the doors for detainees. doctor

preobrazhensky. tomorrow after the program time. this is your institute. take what's yours right. there's a big game on the air. now we will talk about another conflict where people are dying, dying in large numbers, mostly civilians. i'm talking, of course, about the conflict around gas, and resolutions of the general assembly are being adopted, there was even some timid resolution of the un security council. where both russia and the united states abstained, each naturally for

their own reasons, everyone told netanyahu that he somehow needs to calm down a little, that this is impossible, that’s what netanyahu says in response. citizens of israel, we are expanding military operations in the gaza strip, we will continue the war until hamas is completely defeated, this is the only way to return the hostages, destroy hamas and ensure that gaza will no longer be a threat to israel.

i don’t think it’s very supportive, because everyone was so emotional about this attack that the radicals carried out against the population.

so, look, taking advantage of this moment, now what is netanyahu doing as a strategist, he is trying to advance as far as possible militarily, to do as as much as possible before he still probably has to give in under the pressure of public opinion, he says that he ignores, well, not that much, not that much, after all, they are also keeping an eye on him, now even these days he hasn’t made certain modifications , but he is trying to capture as far as possible, in his time...

far from what netanyaho would, of course, want. according to today's data, approximately 43-45%, the largest - this is the territory of gaza, is under more or less such, well, tight control, and the rest are not, that is, 60%, in this small territory, this territory is not under control, the situation there is very difficult, it is shown there. without shelter , it is very, very dangerous for an israeli soldier, and so on , that is, in principle, such a flabby military situation, a lot of israeli equipment has been destroyed, and this continues, in principle, this, of course, is now working to ensure that in the future there will be a need for israel to change here is his current approach to

an approach that will dictate, will be dictated by circumstances, a transition of some sort. an approach or the current government or both? well, the government of netanyahu himself is a product of the development of the situation, let’s not overestimate them, although netanyahu’s skill , of course, is amazing, nevertheless , some changes will still occur there, but for now this is the general direction of public opinion - this still an attempt to solve some problems. military, military-political ways, in parallel, the americans and the israelis themselves, they are working on options for further development of the situation, there are several options, direct military control, which will not look very good, of course, in the 21st century, and some other options are more realistic, uh,

well, for example, this is the creation of some kind of structure that will not have a name. state, but it will have some bodies, new bodies of self-government, they will apparently abandon the old ones, there will be some new ones, the most important thing that israel would like to retain is control of the military field in the field of security, well in general, control over everything that will happen there, and withdraw an absolute minimum of settlers from the territory, the territory of the west bank and...

the jordan river, well, in conclusion , i would like to say that the americans in this situation are working on a whole set of plans, a plan including working with... specific leaders of the future of this system of self-government, with in order, one way or another, to maintain

western control over those new structures, not yet very clear, that will eventually arise on the territory of the west bank of the jordan river and gases, that is, there is much more to come, the palestinians they thank us for our moral and political help, and just... just today they asked, i will also report, they, they are asking to increase the number, perhaps, of our doctors, to do some kind of field work, to deploy an additional number of hospitals, or medical posts, nearby, that’s where rafah is, where the crossing into the gas territory cannot be done, but at least turn around nearby, because people are in an absolutely dire situation, this is one of those very big ones -

“no, i can’t, i think that after all, well, we we all know about this, the pro-israel lobby is very

powerful in the united states , the jewish community is very consolidated, it is an intellectually powerful community that largely controls the press, hollywood, by the way, television, in this sense, of course, i understand that biden is there.

" , unless something stops him somehow. we're leaving for advertising, we'll be back in just a few minutes, let's talk about another place, about the balkans. decorating clothes with flowers, overloading them with all sorts of details, this does not mean creating fashion, but making a dress based on just one line is real art. this is... being yourself, trying not to follow trends. i never expect anything from anyone. most likely, they are expecting

something from me. art. is there a difference between a male fashion designer and a female fashion designer, only you can judge that. fashion is a game where anything can happen to anyone. motador - high fashion. on friday. at first, what you think about the world of fashion, perhaps it is an even more magical world, than mine. the bird is now free, but wants to go back into the cage. the first new year

is december 30th on the first. there's a big game on the air, and now there's unrest in another country, a european country, in serbia. let's listen to what the president of serbia, vucic, said.

and if, of course, a new vote had been held there, it suddenly turned out that the results would have been qualitatively different than the original ones, then of course there would have been new pressure on the president of serbia to recount some votes, that is, it was, let’s say, real , a significant concession, but nevertheless, the demonstrators went on an assault, which has so far been repulsed, they talk about the demonstrators’ connections with soros, methodology.