asked me to check if this was really true, i said: sasha, you lost the cognac, because your mother is so wonderful, she sings about a steam locomotive, it was said about yuri detochkin’s mother, in another film by eldar rezan, remove the car, she played her the same lyubov ivana dobzhanskaya, and the fact that eldar aleksandrovich constantly cast the same actress for the role of the mothers of the intelligent klutzes, detochkin and lukashin, apparently suggests that she somehow reminded him of his own mother, otherwise it matter... it is impossible to explain, to end the topic with dobzhanskaya, i remember that when i wrote a review of the film irony of fate, of course, it was not at the time of release, because at the time of release i was in second grade, it was a retro review, in the final it was said, it is unclear in which city moscow or leningrad a young family will live, but it is absolutely clear that on the third street of builders, here is my wife’s diamond eye, who understands human beings much better... what is it like

to live together with this mother in the same apartment, what can the mother of a thirty-eight-year-old uncle say, who is still not married and who doesn’t know which way to approach a woman, if a friend flies to him from st. petersburg with a valuable broom, the only thing she can and should say is, i’m going to aunt vera, but this phrase was said by another mother , instead, bzhanskaya with a unique... says: let's wait and see, and this shooting look that two women of the same beloved man throw at each other clearly demonstrates that they, of course, will live in leningrad, leaving the same love dobzhanskaya to another love sokolova, who plays nadya's mother. that review had an absolutely wonderful title, i would just like to brag, because no one knows this title, it was called a drunken marriage.

flew in, the title didn’t work, because the leading editor of the light, we won’t mention his last name, he’s already deceased, said that such a cheeky headline should not be put on the page, because next to my text there is an obituary of the playwright volodin. i lost my temper and said that alexander moiseevich volodin was, in general , a completely unbridled alcoholic, always he was happy about it, and would only be glad if his obituary was placed next to the text called marriage due to a drunken flight, and... if it really needs to be smashed, then you can move the obituary to another page, the whole magazine is in your hands. as for everything else, then, of course, the film irony of fate or enjoy your bath had worldwide historical significance, perhaps, well , frankly speaking, against the will of its authors. it is clear that the screenwriter and director never intend to make some kind of big manifesto for the middle class out of the film, which, in fact... came out

of the irony of fate, the fact is that at the end of the sixties a middle class appeared for the first time in the soviet union, such a layer of average-income people between the party elite and hard workers working with their hands, this was due to the fact that for the first time the oil wells of siberia started working , and besides, just in time for the film’s release, we supplied oil to the world market at the height of the energy crisis, after the war, a capacious time...

i gave 25, as a result of which they had exactly the same views, and they sang absolutely identical songs based on poems by russian, non-russian poets, belaya akhmadulina, boris pasternak, evgeny vtushenko and uncle sasha aronov, an absolute guru and such a house editor of moskovsky komsomolets. the song, if you don’t have an aunt, is his composition, he was the absolute idol of the entire editorial staff, much older than everyone else, and even 15 years after the film , when i came to the editorial office, i found him, in general, we

became quite friendly. there was only one flaw in the film, which the public forgave it at the time of its release and still forgives it to this day. for the time being, maybe not everyone even... fixes it, they understand, now many of the younger generation like to snatch various blunders in old soviet films, one fool even wrote that in the film the diamond arm there was a blunder that no one notices, it’s already horseradish knows how many years, in particular , she wrote, because it is absolutely clear to everyone that the ordinary soviet citizen did not have enough money for a taxi, and semyon semenovich gorbunkov could not leave the port at night by taxi, but had to wait for the morning public one. of course the fool was laughed at by everyone the russian people who lived then, because a kilometer of taxi mileage then cost 10 kopecks, for a ruble you could go from anywhere in moscow to any other point in moscow, it was precisely the taxis that were in short supply, and not

the money for it, as for the irony of fate , it was different there, by the seventy-fifth year there was a free movement with air transportation, everyone remembers from the sixties that... all the sixties those who met and saw off had every opportunity to go out onto the airfield, this is clearly visible in the film i walk on in moscow, it all starts with a girl dancing, who is doing well, right on the airfield, she meets her husband, and at the end of the film, the low season of the year sixty-eight, when a huge number of photo reporters run out onto the airfield to meet our team, who defended the honor and independence of their homeland , the whole affair ended in the year seven ... the second after the attempt to hijack our plane to turkey, when the brazinskas father and son attacked the crew on the line, if my memory serves sukhumi batumi, in this direction, where the turkish border was completely nearby, the crews were arming themselves, and apparently,

they are trying not to talk about it, but an absolutely wild battle took place in the air, because three of the four crew members were wounded, flight attendant kurchenko was killed. the attackers were not injured, but it is unlikely that they would have opened fire if they had not been fired back. and exactly after that, personalized tickets were introduced, firstly, flight safety was greatly tightened, all these same modules and checkpoints - probing for hardware - were installed, and of course, zhenya lukashin, no matter how drunk he was, pavlik could not fly to the city of leningrad with a ticket, all this can be explained as simply as simple as pie, the fact is that if... and it was actively shown in 100 theaters of the soviet union. probably, the only thing i seriously regret is the inability to return to the soviet union for a while,

to watch the irony of fate in completely different casts, because it is clear that these would be completely different performances, depending on different performers, but this, unfortunately impossible. for the seventy-fifth year tickets there were already names, but since the freedom of going onto the airfield to buy tickets like for a tram was still very much alive, people gave up and didn’t pester the authors with such claims, they were looking for a performer for the main role in the film for a long time, they tried out, if my memory serves me right lyubshin and dal, and my friends say that of course... if oleg ivanovich dal had been cast in the main role, then it would have been a tragedy rather than a comedy. dal was a drinker who had a very hard time experiencing the ugliness of the world around him, rezanov decided to somewhat smooth out the reaction and approved an artist with

the familiar surname mikhkov for the main role. as for the female role, everything was much more complicated with her. the fact is that rezanov needed it. a lady, firstly, uh, still not of her first youth, as the wonderful writer terekhov said, a stranglehold of the last chance, and secondly, inhumanly attractive, so that all the men of the soviet union would fall in love with her, thirdly, after all she must be a great actress because she must keep people's attention for 2 hours close-ups, fourthly, it is extremely desirable that the russian people know absolutely nothing about this actress, but... because if you cast the titular beauties in the main role, say, bolotova or the vertinsky sisters, then somehow there is a trail behind them their previous roles, and it’s somehow difficult to imagine that such incredible beauties work as teachers in a secondary school in leningrad. rezanov tried a huge number of actresses, most likely, he mostly

went to big shows, but he didn’t find the right lady, for some reason they weren’t suitable for him, and the decision to cast polish woman barbara in the lead role. was a completely sniper decision, since we, of course, knew about this actress, she played in the film anatomy of love, which we had, mrs. barbara. was very ironic about the fact that in the soviet box office all anatomy was cut off into a basket, in fact, in the fifth minute, in the original version she appeared on the screen completely without anything, and clearly, like at home from a strict catholic country, she considered this a real feat and was angry at us for this feat - yes, they didn’t show it to their viewers. in addition, she played a tiny episode in the series liberation, she was no longer known, but still not so much that her image was

so familiar to the whole nation, so as not to allow the possibility that she was a teacher from st. petersburg, leningrad, of course , they took yuri yakovlev, an artist of the vakhtangov theater, to play the role of the waterman, we will talk about him a little later, from very serious moments, i need to add only one at the moment... when ippolit gets into the shower dressed, i’m in some completely late year suddenly i felt, i remembered that in the shower he was pronouncing, almost word for word , a monologue by marcelo mastroianni, who was climbing dressed into the trevi fountain, which we usually call trevi, but incorrectly, because the emphasis is on the last syllable for the french, and for the italians on the penultimate one, so here he is dressed, climbs into the fountain and says exactly the same words, how boring we live, we stopped climbing into women’s windows, and in general all this is disgraceful.

in fact, rezanov, who is a fan of italian cinema, has many of his films quotes from other films, gave ippolit this phrase verbatim, and not a single damn film critic bastard in 40 years has bothered to remember and at least compare these two pictures, despite the extreme declaration of love for both phillinia and rezanov and everything else. i’m from... where i came from, from india, how did this happen?

i don’t know how to say it in spanish, at my age you shouldn’t worry so much, field of miracles, new year’s edition, i wish that all your family and friends are alive and well, on the first, mancacher whiskey, a product of the steller group. this still the podcast burn with fire and i, its host denis gorelov, with a story about winter paintings for the new year. the film became an absolute favorite. and the soviet people , got into the very heart, from year to year

it is watched anywhere in the world where russian people find themselves, i personally had to watch the irony of fate, firstly, in israel, where new year is a completely different day, and russian jews, who get completely drunk on the night of january 1, in the morning at work, say that they celebrated sylvester, the fact is that 1 january is st. sylvester's day, and... and i must honestly say that in poland, another new year's film by uldar ryazanov , carnival night, was called sylvester's night. in addition, i even saw him in morocco, in the city of azueira, we booked a couple of tables with friends in a restaurant, set up a laptop, 20 minutes later all the russian people who had only been in this city were sitting around us, we immediately met, became close friends at the film irony fate or with light steam, i think. that she still has some reserve for the future, we’ll see later, an attempt to get youngsters hooked on

it is still in effect, i personally tried to get two ten-year-old boys interested in this picture, but 20 years before the irony of fate, the first feature film by ildar aleksandrovich ryazanov, a professional documentarian, was released, carnival night. during those years, the communist party felt that the country was lacking. comedies, because of which she called the country’s main cinematographer ivan aleksandrovich pyryev, by the way, the comedian was a big boss in the party, inserted a cap into him, pyryev never.

watching the amateur performances of professional schools, there was an absolutely gorgeous spectacle when several dozen vocational school students stood up, if memory serves, with xellophones and played the flight of the bumblebee on the xellophones, a wild spectacle, but overall unforgettable. rizanov had absolutely no intention of becoming a comedian, but he began to resist, but the conversation with pyrev was short, and thus ildar aleksandrovich became a comedian, this situation is very close to me, because i also did not intend to be a film critic. worked for myself political department, but in the 1990s i made a serious political mistake, they kicked me in the neck with all their hearts and said: now are you going to write about cinema? so olimomsavich rezanov and i began to do what we loved and loved under the cruel dictate of the communist authorities. they usually say about razanov that he was not soviet, he was deeply

anti-soviet, that he always had a fig in his pocket, a rather strange statement, because all ... criticism of ilid aleksandrovich was exclusively at the level of the krokodil magazine, his paintings were about some problems in the youth cafe dandelion, a film, give me a plaintive book, about some injustices in the distribution of corporate garages, a feature film , garage, and finally, about a creepy bureaucrat in a workers’ club, so-so, of course, satire, although on the other hand it’s funny, for ryazanov the task it was necessary to string onto... a living thread of the plot, several musical, bright numbers, common for concerts of that time, scriptwriters boris lasin and vladimir polyakov did this. laskin, in general, was famous only because he wrote the words to the song three tankmen, three cheerful friends, from that time on nothing significant

came from his pen, he had rather flat fillets, i read him especially for a book about a carnival night.

runs to montana samples, at another moment he was offered a ride in a troika, but it turned out that he didn’t have a winter hat, so everyone tore off their earflaps, inu shove montana into a sled, montan takes it from raikin, arkady’s soul sings, now this text is online in general , not entirely accessible, but there is a lot there funny, everyone got a hard time, including sergei mikhalkov and sergei yutkevich, the latter especially.

they found the wonderful lyudmila gurchenko for the main role, at that moment she, of course, was not any dramatic actress, most likely her... dramatic gift developed precisely during the period when she had to sit without roles 10 years later, but the actress was eccentric, she was of a very high level, everything in the film

was wonderfully wonderful, and rezanov said that there were some sagging inconsistencies in the plot, and that the viewer would never in his life i didn’t think about it, the only recipe was to drive the pace, pace, pace to the fullest, so that the viewer simply did not have time to look back. what is happening, the only time the tempo sagged happened at the moment of the romance waltz in farewell to the librarian adelaide kuzminichna ramashkina, anyone who looks at this picture, i watched it many times, sees that suddenly there is a breakdown in movement, that this romance is completely useless, i i asked specialists why the hell ryazanov even had this episode, to which adults quickly explained to me, they said: “friend, they told me they, in the final episode, when gurchenko sings her gorgeous aria, if you frown , you’ll leave the house, if you’re not happy, it’s a sunny day, where she’s in a fur

muff, surrounded by cordo-flyers, she turns around her axis, her coat flies up , suddenly her knees are visible, and so , knowledgeable people told me, for every centimeter of lyudmila gurchenko’s visible knees there was an incredible struggle on all floors... rezanov threw them his bone, this is a senile romance, well, not exactly senile, but after all, a romance for aunties who are as a result of the war, they were left without husbands. accordingly, at the same moment the elder, in love with the librarian, spoke. an accountant with a fable, why did a bear come to the ball with unforgettable lines, why did the harek go to the larek, why did the badger sit down, it

was repeated by all alcoholics for 30 years later, the role of the accountant was played by a unique character in our film comedy, andrei tutyshkin, who appeared in comedies not more often, once every 12 years, but he always got hit by a sniper, ended up in those pictures that were known to the entire council. to the people. his first appearance was in film "volg and volga" in the role of conductor alyosha, who conducted the turkish march at the moment when their competitors ran aground. there was even a song sung in the credits. conductor alyosha trubyshkin, artist andrey tutyshkin. after that , he appeared in the carnival night, and 9 years after the carnival night, he staged his only own picture. but it was a super comedy, which immediately took sixth place in the entire rating of soviet box office distribution in history, it was the film wedding in malinovka, a man who knows how to get caught

in the right place, at the right time, everyone loved him very much. as for the bureaucrat, the main anti-hero, who constantly turns out the colors in the entire subordinate institution, he was played by igor vladimirovich linsky, at that time already a superstar of the small theater, who... filming for literally a month, no need to talk, squat, our formidable house manager, now also a physical education teacher, any

roads, see you soon , look, i did everything i wanted, thank you very much, he ruined people like you, saw the nose, here, saw it, yes, fantastic, next level, finals, tomorrow on the first floor, new year 's premiere on the first floor, so we have a very...

game, i wash it down with cognac, lost, father, homeless people on the first floor, they are interviewing, be amazed polite, otherwise i will upset you beyond belief, january 1st on first, this is

still a podcast, burn with fire and i, its host denis gorelov, with a story about the winter paintings of eldar aleksandrovich ryazanov, absolutely irreplaceable in the new year. on january 1, in soviet times they really liked to stage the third winter film by eldar ryazanov - the hussar ballad. rezanov staged in the gossar ballad the play of the forties by alexander golodkov a long time ago, i was faced with the most serious problem, the play was huge in terms of timing and... volume of text, it exceeded the required film by about 2 and a half times, so the director had to personally dig into the french like hussars with a saber, into the text itself and throw out whole huge pieces from it, the play was written for repertory theaters, there for each episodic hussar and for each episodic friend of shurchka azarova there was its own replica, in general there were all of them

ryazanov cleared out entire storylines... lines , including, by the way, the story of the actress zharmon and gusar nalymov, where in the film they meet occasionally and exchange two or three lines, in the play they had their own long line, it got to the point that in at some point, rezanov had to connect some incompatible pieces, he had to come up with a few more couplets, at that moment he tried to engage the author glodkov and... at that moment he most seriously doubted his authorship, because golodkov fed him several breakfasts months. marizanov simply felt that gladnov simply did not know how to write in rhyme. izanov had to finish writing this link himself, exactly at the moment when the wounded courier’s rustling noise received the dispatch insert and rushed from the french horsemen across the summer fields. actually, here are all the verses relating to conversations with courier. and

arrival at headquarters, all of them were written by rizanov himself. as for the choice of an actress for the main role, the rezanovs again had problems, because, of course, they needed not only an athletic, capable girl excellent in the saddle, not only a generally smart and good actress, but still a young lady who, under certain circumstances, with a certain haircut , can be mistaken for a boy. for the main role. svetlana nemalyaeva, lyudmila gurchenko, valentina malyavina auditioned, but there is a feeling that they had absolutely no luck, because it just so happened that the regular actresses of the play a long time ago were maria ivanovna bobanova, lyubov ivanovna dobzhanskaya, yes, the same one, who sang about a steam locomotive 25 years later, in the forties at the army theater, the cavalry maiden shurochka azarova was played, and finally, larisa ivanovna golubkina.

here there is clearly some completely irrational coincidence of circumstances, apparently, only an actress with the middle name ivanovna can be approved for the role of the cavalry for the maidens, and the stars just so aligned, so for lyudmila markovna gurchenko, svetlana vladimirovna nemalyaeva and valentina aleksandrovna malyavina, there is of course nothing there luminary, and just a graduate of one of the theater schools larisa golubkina was approved for the main role, she was there she is absolutely good, indeed at some point... for all her attractiveness , one can confuse her with a boy, but of course, the most important discovery, the mythical hero of this production was lieutenant rzhevsky, this role was played by the wonderful artist yuri yakovlev, and, importantly, artist of the vakhtangov theater. the vakhtangov players have always combined a certain academic style of performance, very serious acting and transformation. with

outright foolishness, the film, of course, had its own big problem and inconsistency, uh, the authorities categorically did not wanted to assert that everything was the same

, it was no longer possible to reshoot, the film was being prepared for the autumn anniversary, at the moment when it was ready, after a laudatory note from the film reviewer of izvestia and the week was published in the newspaper nedelya, a supplement to izvestia, the fact is , that the news was directed by khrushchev's son-in-law, and there was some possibility that the role of lyinsky was liked not by the reviewer, but by khrushchev's son-in-law adzhubey, perhaps even... khrushchev himself, when you knew from what rubbish, the premieres are back on the grid again, the film was released, with that time the entire soviet people associates kutuzov only with the image of ilyinsky with a dashing

pirate eye patch, which kutuzov never wore, in general, the premiere was a great success, and the only thing that i personally think the picture was missing was the final passage of the hussars through the snow with ... with the song a long time ago, a long time ago, a long time ago, would have ended in paris, which actually happened in 1813, when our troops entered paris , scared and dispersed everyone there, and even gave birth to the word bistro. unfortunately, in the sixty-second year we simply didn’t have the opportunity to bring a huge horde of hussars’ horses and props to paris, we just didn’t have that kind of money, i think paris would have met us halfway, so the passage of shurochka azarov and the couple rzhevsky... past the eiffel tower, unfortunately, was not took place, and it would have been a wonderful ending for a wonderful picture. it was a podcast, mount with fire and i, hosted by denis gorelov, with a story about the winter films of eldar aleksandrovich ryazanov.

this is the lungs podcast. me and its presenter mikhail khanov. today we will talk about what professions, competencies, specialties will be in demand in the near and not only in the near future, therefore in demand - this means well paid. lately, we have been hearing more and more often that artificial intelligence will leave millions of people on planet earth unemployed, entire industries, professions, and specialties will be closed and forgotten. is this true, what are really trends in the labor market? and what about just headlines to attract attention, today we will try to figure it out together with the director of human development capital, skolkovo school of management sergei spasov, hello sergei, hello mikhail, well, let me start with such a general

question, right now in the labor market, a seller’s market or a buyer’s market, that is, what is more of those who are looking for work or those who are looking for workers in general are now in a seller's market. yes, in general , there are more vacancies than there are candidates, and this is amplified by various factors, and the departure of people in recent years in large numbers , the demographic hole in which we find ourselves, the rise of the economy there in the last in the last year, this all leads to the fact that it is more difficult for companies to find people, this is in general, but it’s interesting if you look at specifics there, yes, there are industries and there are areas in which... it is very difficult to find candidates, these are blue-collar professions, these are sales , those same blue collar workers, there is a seller’s market in our terminology in general, but if you look at white collar workers, especially at

top management, then the situation in recent years has not changed much from what it was before, yes, there is one vacancy there there are from 12 to 20 candidates there, it’s there the statistics are very conditional there, yes, but nevertheless... it shows the difference between white collar workers and blue collar workers, that is , the hands of drivers, yes, that is, those who drive, as i say, i am a parent with hands, yes a leader, they are always more, that is, there are always many people who want to manage. there is someone to choose from, this shortage of human capital, yes, let’s say so in the abstract, this is a trend of two years five dash ten in russia, that is, how long is this trend in your opinion? difficult to make predictions it seems to me that this is for the next decade, at least, firstly, because of the demographic hole, the situation will be there, because of this factor, it will probably be corrected in some near future, but some other factors . which we will probably talk to you about there, yes, i can’t

say for sure, but how they will affect our labor market, well, the already mentioned artificial intelligence, automation will not replace, let’s say, it will not compensate for this lack of labor , look, there is robotization this is not a new trend, we have been actively talking about artificial intelligence for the last year, and before that we talked about automation, before that we talked about robotization, every time some kind of disruptive technology appears, everyone immediately says: we will all be replaced there, yes ? but meanwhile, we still travel by taxi with a driver there, and at some point i think driverless cars will appear in widespread use there, but it’s unlikely that it will be in the next five years there, and even 10 years , my personal opinion is the same same with artificial intelligence will certainly affect many specialties, and it is already reflected, if i don’t know, 5 years ago , in almost all of them. the centers that you called or that called you, you spoke

with people, but now the situation is the opposite, in almost all call centers, you are already talking with robots that are quite normal, there are also some examples where - automation, artificial intelligence is already in such demand that it replaces humans, it’s hard for me to say, that’s exactly what they replace where people are reducing their efforts, they are reducing their efforts, that is, where it was necessary to hire 10 people before, now.

then in the future it will be more difficult for white-collar workers than for blue-collar workers, this is, let ’s explain for our audience, white -collar workers, these are office employees, well, in principle, these are office employees, one might say, not only managers, this is in principle office office employees, and why, that is, where will they disappear, who will do the work that they are doing now, or they do nothing and so, their you can safely reduce it, well, just new software, the same artificial intelligence, increased productivity. the company is all reflected in the reduction in the total

number of office employees, as it was written down for white -collar workers, managers, this is an interesting question, will they still be in demand or will they be in demand less and less and the tops will be needed there, the best of the best, and these will be there tens of hundreds, and not thousands, as now, from the point of view of managers, it seems to me there will be those who have... fairly narrow specializations are in demand, but now, after the pandemic, the trend that i observe when searching for managers there, let’s say you and a retail company are looking for financial retail sales, yes, let me explain, yes yes yes, you are looking for a financial director there, yes you a large company, as before, the search took place there , yes, you look at other companies the same as you , comparable in size, who there is a trend

to look for specialists who are most suitable for the tasks facing them companies, and if previously companies often looked for a specialist simply from a company similar in profile and size to theirs, now. the company has specific tasks, for example, entering a new region, or, say, a merger, there is an acquisition of another company, and the company is already looking, if we are talking about top managers, not simply.

develop some projects, well, in general , this generation is somehow changing the labor market, that is, there are some requests to reduce non-working weeks to work remotely, for something else, because well, in the next 10 years they will appear. the main working mass, are there any changes in connection with this? if you look at the generation, then the zoomers, they are more flexible and more demanding of their employers, they make the decision to change jobs easier, if generation x, yes, which we belong to, is characterized by achievement, it is characterized by ambition

and perseverance, so to speak, zoomers are more concerned about their life-work balance. they defend their boundaries more in terms of personal time and working time, and therefore it is more difficult for the employer to work with them, yes, if the previous generation x was given a task there, they ran there and work, and in terms of the quality of task completion, i don’t think that this is a generational story, yes, the quality of execution tasks still depend on the specific person, on how the tasks are set, my personal, my personal from the manager, yes. and well, from a person and from his leader, yes, but by the way, when we talk about generations, for some reason everyone always says that there is now generation y it turns out that generation z is entering the labor market, but the population of the country as a whole is maturing, yes, and

if we look at the horizon of 20-35, i read recently. with trends and saw figures there that in 2035 40% of the country's population will be generation x and baby boomers, those who were before x, respectively 40% - this is a very large part, in general it is clear that this generation i will partially retire there, but what does this mean? it ’s been 20 years since my career started there.

there is less and less health there, god forbid sometimes they don’t allow it, but nevertheless, even at this age a person not only knows how to do it, but she has the strength and desire to do some kind of work, not just there, let’s say, happy longevity, but there ’s certainly that too for a walk .