there is a big game on the air, and tucker kalson flew from moscow and has already managed to get to dubai, where he gave his interpretation, an interview with vladimir putin.

and this is the honest truth. russia is ready to negotiate and president putin spoke about this clearly and definitely in his interview with tucker cralson. but also, russia spoke about something else, with its actions during the special operation. but putin also spoke about this in an interview with carlson. putin warned that there are some things.

ithaker emphasized in his speech in dubai that this is a crazy idea, his takeran’s expression, not mine, it’s a crazy idea to try to take crimea away from russia, because in this case russia, putin personally , will be ready for the most decisive actions, the most decisive actions, it seems to me that this is what it consists of.

messages that there is no desire to return to the complacent times of the nineties, when russia perceived the collective west as a partner, that the russian government today has no such desire, there is a completely different picture of the world than the one that, if you like, was the main one, the main one in the nineties years. well, if you're watching. to what is happening in the united states, in europe, in relation to russia, in relation to the conflict around ukraine, well, frankly speaking, there is no reason, there is no reason for such a complacent approach, well, if we are talking about, say, poland, i will give a simple fact: there is a report that poland has already doubled its armed forces in recent years, from 100 to 200. but this is not enough, now poland

is going to increase its armed forces to 3000, as a result it will have the largest. but according to ministries, command posts, headquarters, but in ukraine itself, ukraine itself, they say that they are going to sharply increase the production of drones, and without long-range pilots, let's

listen, the category of long-range kamigadze drones is growing, their range is 300, 500, 700 and 100 km, 2 years ago this category... did not exist, this is the essence of the breakthrough in the technology war, we are going to continue to bet on this, work in this direction, because technology can really save us, well in the united states senate today voted for the bill on assistance to ukraine, and the vote was for, 70 senators voted, 29 against, well, here you look at it differently, on the one hand, a significant majority voted for assistance to ukraine, on the other hand, still - 29 senators voted against it, mostly republicans, but a year ago this was

impossible, now there will be a vote in the house of representatives, and there will be a speaker. house michael johnson said he strongly opposed the bill because that he does not want to help ukraine, while nothing is being done to protect the american border, mainly the american border with mexico, he has control over the majority of the republican faction, but they are already talking about that with the help of a parliamentary maneuver ...

forward, not only about what is happening right now under the biden administration, they are thinking about how to tie the hands of donald trump if he becomes president, let's listen. the memo argued that approval of these measures could tie the hands of donald trump if he takes office next year. the new bill represents an attempt by the foreign policy establishment, or deep state, to thwart the president.

it’s not about the personality of the leader, it’s about the mood of the elites; if the idea of ​​domination at any cost, and with the help of forceful actions, prevails in american society, then nothing will change, it will only get worse, and if in the end the realization comes that the world is changing according to objective circumstances, one must be able to adapt to them in time, using...

raising champagne is not something that is too early to do this at all, because the situation is not conducive. a special military operation is underway, we need to solve problems here now, you see, if you remember claudivitz, then war is a continuation of politics by other violent means, here is our policy, openness, such goodwill, over these decades, starting from... the nineties led to the fact that the guys from the banks

of the potomac thought that now they can do anything, they have all solved all their problems, the world is at peace their feet, and what is russia there, what will they talk about there, now we will put things in order, well, they should put things in order at home, you see, you can’t wake up recklessly. while it is quiet, folk wisdom , you can’t argue against it, as well as against the facts, because the americans very effectively used this very strategy of controlled migration in europe, in order to dictate their terms very effectively, but now look, this is the very problem stood in front of them. they don’t know what to do, because some sensible politicians say:

well, let's mind our own business, our border is on fire, we have crowds of people crossing it every single day, we need to do something there, restore order, we have a lot of problems in our country, at this time the other part, the so -called politicians, says no, let's help ukraine, because we can't allow russia to win, well, this... actually, it's not that short-sighted, it's a betrayal of their own american people, because today they are the interests of ukraine, the interests of the zelensky clique put above interests ordinary americans, whom they actually represent and whose rights they must defend, and here the problem of these same elites is that after the end of the great patriotic war, the americans, in a clash with the soviet union, suffered one defeat after another, the korean war - defeat, the war in vietnam - defeat,

the war in afghanistan, is also not in their favor, why, because in 10 years we put things in order there, we built a lot of things there, we carried out tasks there brilliantly, but the operation the withdrawal of a 140,000-strong group from there, it is generally worthy of any study and recording. interests of each other, russia has its own interests, if you don’t take them into account,

then you will receive, as they generally do now, as for poland, well , it seems to me that this is the next ukraine, the poles have historically this is their pride, this ambition, as they say, it always led them in the wrong direction, i remember in the history of the war of 812. there was one episode when the polish uland regiment, in front of napoleon rushed into the water on horseback to cross the berezina and was practically drowned by the regiment commander. why, it was unclear, they could wait to calmly cross the bridge, and here they are all the time climbing somewhere, in the end this desire of theirs to climb somewhere will be used by the older brother, because now... and the west recognizes this, because the average age of a ukrainian soldier there is 45 and 45 plus,

but why? yes, because the goal, in fact , of all this disgrace that they are doing with ukraine is not to preserve it there or or or or to defend independence, but no at all, the goal is to destroy the population of ukraine, which remembers what the soviet union is. who remember that they lived in the same state, who can, if the cap of propaganda is removed from them, understand that they are doing something wrong, if...

by the majority, but still in the united states there is unlikely to be a certificate perceived in the states is very, i would say, my premise is that this is for for the majority and was not intended, was not intended, quite right, it was intended at all

everything is for the elite, but to be honest, the majority are unlikely to watch the entire interview. a good bookstore, the first thing i saw, the most popular one is there first , so you enter, at the entrance there is a column with books that are the most popular, but who was there, tolstoy, dostoevsky and chekhov, war and peace at the same time, i remember, it was during this trip, i visited

america more than once, it was published in the united states with a circulation of 700,000 copies, i must say, it was sold out, and this is such a book, this is such a book, where there are a lot of complex, i would say , things, in america there is its own intelligentsia , in america there is a very educated elite, in america there are people who know a lot, are interested, understand, so i think that for them this is this excursion into history, it will not at all, will not provoke they are in shock on the contrary. will be very useful for them, but my version is that our president did not only do this for them, i think that we forget that this interview, because it will probably end up in ukraine, it will probably happen, since everything that is from russia today completely closed, in fact, our president has not had

the opportunity to communicate directly or live at all for more than 2 years. everything has been rewritten, and this is already, and this is in this, in this state, at least two generations have already grown up, so it seems to me that what the president meant.

president who can formulate this in general competently, then in general i would be if i, for example, heard such an excursion from this is interesting, i am absolutely sure that many

russian citizens would also be interested in this, and in an interview with a russian journalist, in an interview with a russian , to a russian journalist, yes, but it ’s really interesting the position of the head of state in relation to his history, here’s texas, well , in fact, here in russia we know very little about texas, well, i read it, someone read it, well, in principle it’s, well, in general -this is a very interesting story, the entry of texas into the united states, the annexation of texas , by the way, a forced annexation, annexation, as far as i remember, alam’s film, if you remember, is famous, where this story was heroized, but if the us president told me about it , i would it’s interesting when people in america say, objecting:

if america backs down on the issue of ukraine, it will deal a blow to the serious attitude towards the united states as a world leader. and it seems to me that president putin very clearly showed russia’s attitude to this issue, and i want to repeat that for russia this is so important that it tests russia’s strength. it would be a very dangerous illusion, we’ll go to advertising, and after advertising we’ll talk about what ’s happening in the middle east

, which we can’t talk about in ukraine, because most of the youth left there. an outstanding teacher and writer anton makarenko was allegedly ukrainian. ukrainians say: makarenko is ours, but why did they demolish makarenko’s monument in kharkov? antifake, premiere, tomorrow on the first. big premiere. forgiveness, please, baronki. who are you, where are you coming from? run yours! i’m ready

to discuss the emperor’s candidacy, tomorrow after the program. for obvious reasons for russia, of course, what is happening around ukraine is a central issue of international security, but if we we look at the situation in the longer term. in the future, then, of course, it is very important what is happening in the middle east, and more specifically, what is happening now between israel and the palestinians, today there was a meeting of the valdai club, where, among other participants, the minister of foreign affairs of russia, sergei lavrov, spoke, that's what he said, among other things, we see this

uncompromising.

following this, we propose holding an inter-palestinian meeting with the participation of all leading palestinian factions to overcome internal divisions. for obvious reasons, in israel and, in general, in the united states , not to the same extent as in israel, but nevertheless, when they talk about the crisis around gas, they talk about what happened 7.

happened after that cannot justify the actions of hamas, and the fact that happened before this cannot justify hamas' actions. it seems to me that the minister of foreign affairs is absolutely right when he says that without justifying anyone or whitewashing anything, one must understand that for decades, contrary to many... resolutions of the un security council. the palestinian problem was ignored. with palestinians were treated as second- class citizens. and they lived in very difficult, and dare i say, humiliating conditions. many russians who moved to israel say that they were amazed that they could be treated like this.

with people, how palestinians are treated in israel, they are people who moved to israel, consider themselves israelis, and of course, want the most...

the boldai platform this time brought together dozens of experts from the region, who, to the surprise of many, were unanimous in requirement on a two-state solution to the palestinian problem. indeed , one of the chronic problems of the region. it is paradoxical not only that this demand is universal, but also that it united the opinions of regional opponents, arabs and persians, who unanimously express it.

question the fundamental documents that link the normalization of, say, egyptian-israeli relations with a certain historical context, they are ready for the first time to revise these constants, that is, to withdraw from these agreements if this israel's offensive line will continue, and as sergei viktorovich rightly pointed out in his speech, current events do not occur in a vacuum, this is a quote from the speech of the un secretary general, who spoke in a rather bold manner about the events of october 7 last year, speaking about that this escalation of the crisis was the result of a deep-seated problem that was systematically ignored

not only by israel, but mainly by the key sponsor, the key state, which provided a kind of insurance for israel, for any actions of israel , the united states, and i think that... what unites the russian vision, the development of this situation with the vision of the majority of regional experts, is a systematic and chronological approach to the analysis of how it all came together, similar to that , as vladimir vladimirovich quite systematically, historically outlined the russian understanding of the genesis of the ukrainian crisis, this is, in principle , characteristic of our tradition of understanding international relations, we proceed from what can be natural or unnatural somehow folk and somehow... community, we look at the sequence of events that led us to this point, and the russian version of the analysis, interpretation, it just has this fundamental and deeply rooted vision in regional vision,

the american vision against the backdrop on the contrary, they are of such an experimental nature, very transactional, functional, with each new administration they try to come up with, as if a new recipe that will solve this problem, but in the end... these proposals lead to the consolidation of quite fragile, unstable status quo, which is sure to explode next time. and one of the constants that i think the valdai conference this year has established is that without a two- state solution in palestine, no form of ceasefire will be sustainable in the long term. it is with the creation of two states that it will be possible, among other things.

regional experts contained the wish that russia become one of the initiators. would propose a new settlement format

a certain configuration of negotiations, and from which countries have you heard this idea? you know, this is a very wide list of countries, these include the arab countries of the persian gulf, the arab countries of north africa, turkish experts spoke about this, and you mean that these are not some individual artisans, but that this is at the government level, in the expert network of the valdai club, as you know, about 1,300 leading experts take part,

rafah is on the border with egypt, as a place where they can be in relative safety, now israel, prime minister.

we never said that the israelis could not enter rafah to destroy hamas. hamas remains a real threat to the israeli people. both the israelis and the idf will certainly continue operations against the militants' leadership and infrastructure as they should. all we have said is that we believe it is inappropriate to enter without a proper, feasible, effective, credible plan to provide security for the more than a million palestinians who have taken refuge in rafah. what do you think, general, if you were in

idf command of the israeli armed forces, would you take it as a stern warning: do not touch rafah, or there will be very unpleasant consequences, or would you take it as such friendly advice, which, if necessary, can be ignored to say, well, we did everything possible so that the palestinian civilians don’t touch it... for the command, everything that mr. kirby says doesn’t really matter, they have the military-political leadership of their state, which sets them tasks that they are obliged to carry out, like military, everything else, it doesn’t really matter, of course, then questions will arise for the military-political leadership of israel, for...

israel has always proclaimed itself the main fighter against nazism and their followers. in any case, in its official policy, and today in the gas sector, israel, through the hands of tsahal, is pursuing exactly the same policy of clearing the territory of the population, which, in general, was always pursued by nazi germany on the territory of the soviet union. how to

justify this? you can tell as much as you like about hamas, about underground tunnels. you have the power to do this.

states, but on the other hand, israel's dependence on the united states is huge, huge, especially when they again isolate themselves from the arab world, and even in europe their authority has been undermined. and netanyahu , who heads a coalition government and is fighting for survival, the latter, i think , what he would like is that one could say that netanyahu’s course could lead to the united states seriously, if not breaking with israel, then by

at least they will begin to reconsider their blind support for israel. did you hear something in the words? whether it's president biden, whether it's admiral kirby or any other american officials, have you heard anything that should make prime minister netanyahu think about the possible loss of american support? no , no, i haven’t heard, of course, in my opinion, in the tactics or strategy that netanyahu is pursuing, it is agreed upon, not publicly, but it... egypt will be forced to open the gates, because they expect egypt egypt and bring it to a state where

it still does not start, does not enter into war, it does not have the strength to do this, so it seems to me that this plan is more and more obvious, and it is apparently agreed with

... their advantage is too great, but i have no doubt that the next step in the middle east will be the proliferation of nuclear weapons, they will all understand that without nuclear weapons it is impossible to resolve any issues at all, in today’s world there are nuclear weapons, but in my opinion, this is not the case difficult to get, especially with those financial which arab countries have, so in my opinion this is a completely disastrous decision, not to mention not only for israel, yes, yes, yes. and not to mention the moral side, in this sense you are absolutely right, october 7 was a crime, but strictly speaking, a crime does not mean that it must be compensated before...

the army, in many ways, is the same as the american one, they are the same will not enter there, sending

special forces units and some attack aircraft, they will start with very serious bombing, with such a concentration of people, well, the loss of civilians the populations are large, they are inevitable, there is another option, if you want to send... troops in raffs, so that there are no huge losses among the civilian population. dmitry, if israel wants to solve the problem, then there are two ways. the first way we discussed is how they operate now. and the second way is to make contact, to enter into negotiations, in general, to look for a normal, peaceful solution, because ... well, as they think, everyone is already convinced of the power of israel, which one will they choose? in my opinion, they still gravitate more towards

first, why? to this first method, but because they weren’t taught anything else, they weren’t taught anything else, military operations using disproportionate force, military operations without being considered victims of the civilian population, this is , in general, the basis of the american combat regulations and...

saving the life of my grandfather . there's a big game on the air.

we have very little time left and let's devote it to a free discussion at the round table. and let's start with you, andrey andreevich. i would like to draw the attention of our colleagues to the fact that that events in the middle east, the ukrainian crisis. they fit into one general process that is currently taking place in international relations, this process of the formation of an increasingly dense, complex and independent international environment, in which there are significantly more actors than there were during the cold war, when the confrontation between the soviet union and the united states was determined the development of the international situation, events in palestine, are beginning to form the most paradoxical partnerships, alliances between turkish, arab, persian, actors, countries are beginning to look at things more or less in a solidary way, and this

creates special difficulties for a country that is still trying to... play at being a world hegemon, a country that is trying to determine how international relations will develop, probably at a certain moment there must be an understanding that the natural, objective laws of international life, international development, force us to take into account the opinion of an increasing number of states striving for independence. ukrainian the crisis is a very important starting point for this long crisis, which will lead to the formation of a mature multipolarity.

opera is another point why they need this, they need to continue the formation of such a zone of instability along the borders of their geopolitical opponents, and this is russia, this is iran, this is china, this is what they will continue to do, and what is happening now in the sector gas completely fits into their logic of thinking. and actions that israel will do, we assume that other countries will do this the region needs to be looked at, by the way, i will support korin georievich, about what apparently the princes and leaders of other states will think about the fact that they need to somehow

ensure their security, because the united states is like a guarantor. they no longer perform this function. thank you. karan, you are the last. i would note this moment , as it seemed to me, at least in the interview with our president, a motive that, i think, no, not karls did not catch, no, no, no, he may not be very clear americans, we understand it very well. in at least that’s how i perceived it. see, that's the point.

everything will be different, and for this, as the president said, the soviet union was destroyed, in this i absolutely agree, it was destroyed internally, with the internal consent of the nation that it should be destroyed in order to enter the western world, these illusions , due to everything that happened to us, due to the fact that the west simply threw us out, today they have disappeared, here we are, this, this is the russian nation - this is a nation of idealists in general, with this idealism in general we are 30 for years they persistently argued that we should be with you, this is all going to happen, this is the disappointment that, by the way, i saw in the president, so to speak, at least it seemed so to me, it coincides very much, we are the same year, fifty-second , we are one generation, it was very

clear to me, this is the result, here... yes, our idealism is dead, that’s it, it’s gone, and as they say, we realized that we suffered in this, failure in this, but this...

for our nation, i completely agree with you on one amendment, one wise man is for this table said that we have the right course, but added, the main thing is not to break the wood, this wise man’s name was karen georgievich shakhnazarov, no, there is no need to break the wood, here it is, but this is a very important remark, it is important, as it seems, that this is something that goes without saying. it goes without saying, but president putin recently said that patriotism is a wonderful quality, but there are always people

who want to cling to even the most wonderful quality for some reason of their own, and they say and propose to do some things, without really thinking about the consequences for the russian state.

and patriotism is too wonderful a quality, and i’m not afraid to say, it’s too important a matter to allow people to cling to it, to the detriment of the path that russia is following, we will no longer play by someone else’s rules, which were invented by someone, to our detriment, either we play... honestly, or we play by our rules, the choice is theirs, what choice will they make? you see, history is one big experiment, and i think the lord is interested in all countries.