carries and could take his place on the mozal. please tell me, you know what happened in the country, right? yes, why? tell me, please, i asked you a question, several times already, the same ones, what would you like most now? i would like the entire soviet people... to never forget leonid ledivich brezhny, and what are you most afraid of, if war comes, then i did not attach any importance to this strange answer, but it was a sign that the empire had already begun i take her away from my daughter. what you do you love most? i love it when you're at home.

and what are you waiting for in the near future, so that the new year will come soon, the new year, you love this holiday, very much, besides, this is a picture that is called, remembering chekhov, this is a script written by the deceased, unfortunately, the kingdom of heaven is lost, who

... uncle vanya, who don’t you ask brilliantly, brilliantly, so as not to make him look like a fool, forgive me, i don’t understand, then why are you here, but because stakhievna is kind, because all this is lying, all this is lying about him ah, cherry garden, ah, they forgot the man, hu, your brother is an actor,

we all learned a little, something and somewhere, by the way, somehow, thank you, this is another 21 episode of 20 minutes, it’s called a sentimental journey to my homeland through russia painting, for television, for such international television, pavel andrevich fedot, we have already talked about this wonderful artist, the founder of russian genre painting.

the picture i’m shooting now, it’s called the absolute effect of ball lightning, i wrote the script with ibragimbekov rustav, with whom we did my first thesis together, and then we wrote the siberian barber, then we wrote urga and filmed it. it's a long long summer day in 1936 . moscow region, dacha. if

i may say so, this is to some extent, well, i ’m not drawing parallels, i just want you to understand me correctly, this is so to speak, well, if we talk about... an image, but in no way, not about an attempt to be equal to anyone way, never, but it’s like chekhov who lived until he was thirty-six, that is, it’s kind of like platonov, who lived until he was thirty-six, but there the most platonov could do was jump into the water and blame others for the fact that his life was not a success, but here the game is tougher and more, so to speak, tragic. what funny, round , tender heels you have, but look at mine, look at how the sole is, oh, just put out a cigarette, damn, it’s so hard, haven’t you walked a lot, and

walked, sniffed and ran, where i ran, now after them , now from them, now after them, now from them, and all your life your heels will be so round, round, tender and tender, why? well how why? like why, nadenka? because there will be a lot of cars, planes, trams, trains, and subways, and the roads will be smooth and smooth, and the shoes will be comfortable and comfortable, and the socks will be soft, soft, why? well, why, nadezha? because the soviet regime, because all people will have round heels until old age, you too, and you will have no one to fear, and there will be no need to run from anyone, why? because nadyusha,

the red army will protect you from everyone. go ahead and don't be afraid of anyone. just study well. study well. honor your parents and love your soviet homeland, my little six-year-old daughter nadya is acting, my daughter is playing , i basically started acting in this film so that, so to speak, our communication as father and daughter in the frame was more organic. and i was also in a hurry because she was growing up, she was 6 years old when we started, for some reason i was sure that this was the right time and the very thing that needed to be done now, and i think that i was not mistaken, 27 years later, on the banks

of the volga in a village with the orange name bezvodnoe, you are filming asya the nag, no, well so... no, i think that i’m making a new picture, which in a sense is inspired by the first picture, which was called asya klyachina, with elements, of course, of the same, the same approach to reality, in a certain sense this is a movie , which is connected with the people who live here, and professional artists, not all will be filmed, those people who will be filmed. those who are alive, who did not die because of this, i had a lot of people who , unfortunately, are no longer here, they are gone, but of the survivors, some of them are, we will continue with them, this is research.

i would say this is a kind of lyrical comedy , a tragicomedy, in general , things are pretty bad with humor, personally, as a director, i always want to make a comedy, i never succeed,

i had elements of humor, in general, even there is quite a lot of humor in the siberian series, such lyrical humor, i would say, but here it is more, here it should be sharper in theory, but this is comedy. not situations. some time ago you became president of the cultural foundation. why do you need a person who works so hard, films so much, and burdens himself with such unbearable burdens? public burden, who? well, who should i give it to? i don’t need this, again, this is not omnivorousness, you know, not omnivorousness, but just hope, at least somehow in...

killed, i have nowhere to go in moscow, you can imagine, i have nowhere to go in moscow, i i’m not interested in the house of cinema, i’m not interested in the house of writers, at the presentation, i have nowhere to go there, although i receive all the invitation cards, but...

there’s something else there in yelets, they’re restoring it, something, that is, some kind of life is happening when people realized that they have nothing to expect from moscow, it will not give them anything good, it will not give them, 10 years ago they expected subsidies, sausages, a big theater from moscow, but now nothing no, the big theater is falling apart, the sausage is its own, but moscow doesn’t give money, it says, figure it out yourself, so they figure it out, academician lekhachev was the face of the foundation.

and know how the central bank should work, he shouldn’t do this, he should be the father of the people, travel around the country, not like when a mine exploded there, talk to people so get on the train and go to the far east, then walk back for a year, so go talk to people, understand what kind of country you have in your hands, what kind of people, how they live, know them, love them and have them love you , it is very important. the thing , in my opinion, at least for russia, for sure, consciousness, mentality is a thing, like

an ecological structure, there is, there is this river, you see, the trees, you see, have fallen off, and you cannot force them to be green in the month of october, and in vietnam now everything is green and it’s raining, the mentality is the same, it is impossible to make the mentality western or any other, the russian mentality is a certain ecological structure, it has a commonality. with other mentalities in relation to power, it seems to me that power determines a person, well , power determines a person, the law determines a person, determines the social system, roughly speaking, this can be seen very often, you can see this in one, in one example, in how people , like public transport, or rather transport, you see how people drive cars in moscow, in beruut.

but there is respect for authority in the sense that a person stood up with a baton and hit him, then everything will stop, you know?

into the system, how reforms should be carried out, i don’t understand anything about this, i can only speak on my own behalf, as a person who was born here, grew up, lives here, and entire generations of my ancestors lived, grew up, died here, and i have a kind of hearing in me of what is happening, and it

responds with voices, from there, forward, backward, this is normal life, you haven’t seen me? i had it, i'll be with it because it's now in power, and i will get from him, what, what did i get? salary , government dacha, car, power, what did i get, where, where is the criterion that can be explained, why me, why,

but not why, i need power over people, not enough power over my paintings, over what i think. i need freedom of speech , yes, i don’t need it, i don’t need to earn my political name , my name is enough for me, i earned it with my labor, i earned it, for me this is a certain kind of invulnerability, so that i can they didn’t write me, you know, where is that golden key, for the sake of which, where is it, i don’t need anything, the authorities need me. more than she does to me, because i am independent and i can say what i think, they can be sure that i am not saying this in order to get something for myself, not for that, i have nothing from i didn’t receive them, and i don’t want them, and i don’t want them, this is a fundamental question too, i have always lived by the principle of having a little less

than what i have the right to, so that no one dares to do something like that to you later, okay, nikitushka, your public image is quite apolitical, a counterbalance to you, nikita, is a person who actively intervenes in politics, don’t you think that he is making a mistake by taking away a lot of time that he could devote to creativity, well, you know, firstly, life is so the short answer is that everyone should try to make all the mistakes possible before it ends, everyone has their own, some people think this is a mistake. it seems to some that no, this, this, you know, a person should, it seems to me, express himself as much as possible, nikita expresses himself in politics, probably, firstly, he is very, he seems to personify russia in many ways , big, handsome, with a mustache, talented, humorous, very religious person, you understand,

it really suits him to rock the bell of ivan the great, he is in this i mean, it’s very... nice that russia can have such a public figure, i’m saying this from the outside, simply because i think that politics is very cruel, i’ve already called myself a load, you know , get into the back, i want to be free, internal, i know that politics deprives a person of freedom, i want to be free.

but at the same time, the word is love for the motherland or patriotism, in which i don’t see anything bad, what’s wrong with the fact that i love my homeland, what’s wrong with that? i was never a bolshevik, i was not a member of the party , no, i never made a single picture for the government, for the party, for the secretary general, i didn’t, i didn’t play the secretary of the port committee, i don’t have the lenin prize or any other prize i don’t have a state ussr, that is, it would seem, what do i need,

what do i want, but you are right to strangle them, that you offended them , and so on, censorship, the picture did not come out 2 year on the screen, i’m glad of the day, i could now put all this on the shield, this is where he makes his capital, by the way, as the secretary of the cinematographers’ union and so on, but...

they were opposed to each other as healthy conservatism, to european

liberalism, i don’t think that this is now also sharply divided, the illusions of westerners in their purest form, they are embodied in marxism in russian. i believe that such protection of the nation from western influence is harmful, just as on...

the creation here, say, americanization is also harmful, many people wonder why i don’t answer the moscow komsomol member there , other newspapers there, the president newspaper there, why i don’t answer, it’s very simple, firstly, if i, if these people write so much, it means it’s beneficial for them, that means, to some extent i can consider that i feed them, my name feeds them, but...

this is ultimately the criterion, and not what i say, because what are they saying now, say, those who the day before yesterday were secretaries of port committees, factory committees , marxists, leninists, what they are saying now makes no sense, because what they did is this makes sense, i now do not mean those people who were forced to join the party in order to be the director of a kindergarten. brezhnev, lenin, stalin, or the red banner, or i spoke at the congress and said that our

unforgettable, or... our vice versa, so to speak, living leader, i never did this, but at the fifth congress of filmmakers, when it was allowed trample the authorities, i refused to do this on principle, i don’t like kostya to sing in the chori, i don’t like to participate in the race, it’s very simple trample in the crowd and enjoy the fact that nothing will happen for it, it’s very simple: go out and say: alone, i generally believe that the majority is never right, and any majority needs a minority that will become a majority, and it will need a new minority, because that without opposition there can be no democracy anywhere and never. opposition is a sign of the quality of democracy, a sign of the quality of democracy. and when the opposition is destroyed, when it is banned, when it is shot.

i don’t see the end of russian culture there, scream-cry that there is no spirituality there, and so to speak, it seems to me that very natural natural processes are taking place in russia, these natural processes began, of course, with gorbachev, and the era of gorbachev is the era of the return of a painful return to

some kind of natural path. that when i say cautious optimist, i just don’t think that russia expects some kind of swedish or western european future, we will rather follow a path that may be similar to latin america, to the middle east, that is, a gap between the majority of the population and the minority , which will be extremely wealthy,

will be... very much the same as it was before the revolution, that is, latin america has practically no middle class, the same in the middle east, the middle class is small.

i would leave, i would write with milk between the lines on newspapers, proclamations, what? rudskoy, alexander, inspires confidence in me, i knew him, i know him, i love him, i love him , this, this, this, this is honest, sincere, in my

opinion, what kind of politician he is, i don’t know, i don’t like him gave political advice, but with his help there was a lot done, just simple ones. how right or wrong he is, but in any case, this is a terrible tragedy , well, what a tragedy it is, and what happened is obvious, but i have a question, i have a lot of questions that i want to understand,

and for me the question more important than the answer, let’s say , because well, this question should be, it should be why three people who died in the year ninety-one caused such a gigantic, such...

a sign of a worthy attitude of one person to another is not that having analyzed and taken advantage of the situation, approaching or pushing away from anyone, this is politics, it is always dirty.

a politician cannot count on love, he is a victim, i understand, but i am not a politician. i am a man, according to my human laws, so to speak, to submit to the political situation and the relationship between politicians is unworthy, so i, so to speak, continue to treat him the same way i treated him, i regret everything that happened, but i am convinced that he is a sincere person, if i were around, you know, after all this... this is mine, for me cinema is not a profession, this is my life, in the conditions

in which we shoot, every minute is for me, well, you understand everything, so to say, if i were in moscow, of course i would be next to rudsky, i tried to be as much as possible, let’s say, to influence as much as possible, but this would never unite me with ampilov or with makashov, because well, we have nothing. if i say what i am telling you now, they will write that i am a communist, a patriot. that i

joined, and so on, that i didn’t do anything i spoke because i was here and could not say anything, this is explained by my cowardice and infidelity there, of course, the most profitable thing for them would be for me to be killed on the steps of the white house, then they could calmly, so to speak, confess to some advantages. it’s sad to regret my art that this guy did the wrong thing, but in general he wouldn’t have been bad, well, in vain, of course, he killed to what extent some, others would say, because of such krutsky died , talents, they would have turned it around anyway in a certain kind of their politics , you see, so here it is completely pointless for me to answer them, people who know me may...

did not interfere, and if they did interfere, then on the contrary they supported such an action as the dispersal of parliament, again, i saw all these parliamentary , so to speak, vigils, well, this is kabuki theater in general , well, what can i say, well, it’s clear, although there were, there are honest people, sincere, but all this taken together is absolutely, yes, we don’t know how, we’re learning , we don’t know how, but two things, two things that seem to me very... seriously,

this is when parliament is shot at point-blank range with impunity, without any risk of danger . now i’m not saying who is right and who is wrong, but when there is an absolute feeling of impunity, nothing will happen for it. because there is nothing living

there, nothing alive, nothing more, no compassion, nothing , they are watching, oh-oh, running, oh, they got it, it seems, oh, look, this, this, this is the real most terrible result of bolshevism. this is an image of godlessness, you worked in the west for 12 years, what do you think?

there is still a lot of work to be done, but the country has fantastic opportunities, this does not mean that there will be some kind of great, so to speak, great democracy, but a powerful, rich and fruitful prolific state will of course inevitably arise here, but you don’t feel purely stylistic influences on each other, they probably exist, well, how do they even have intersections? some, it’s so hard to say, no, well, no, i think he uses the general plan very well, he has such a wonderful space, it’s all saturated, so i say, music of the spheres, i love structures, general plans, and andron

once said about you that you solve all the general issues. remember one thing, remember the old man of the land, the land, right? general shot , if you are not afraid to shoot a long shot, like a director, like a director, then you are insured against the fact that there is a lie in the frame, because in close-ups you can shoot anything and however you like, tears can be painted with glycerin and so on , the general plan, when you are not afraid of him, he is afraid of the general plan, when you are not afraid of the general plan, then you are guaranteed as in theater, you can show it, look there, look here

, to the producer, i know, don’t stop the camera , now we’re watching it all, now it was normal, now it was exactly the same, you generally fall into the rhythm that was, yes, 79.27, can i sit in your car, yes, maybe even steer, hurray, like any throat, remember in the movie, huh?

the life of the country in order to change it, the second is, as it were, politically absolutely indifferent, well, we are not gusakov’s brothers to tap dance together in sync, but we, i am mikhalkov, he is konchalovsky, with us this does not prevent us from loving each other and, so to speak, being jealous of each other for some, so to speak, life phenomena, each other’s victories and rejoicing in these victories.

hello, this is tatyana gevarkyan and ne lykomshity. today we remember the great couturier. he was called red dior, considered an innovator, and now his name is embroidered on national canvas. fashion industry. in our studio we have his students and friends, designer and founder of the fashion house victoria andreyanova, designer and artist with a worldwide named andrey. designer and creator of the fashion brand anastasia kuchugova, as well as honored artist of russia and tv presenter

tatyana vedeneeva. tatiana, do you remember your acquaintance with vyacheslav mikhailovich? i don’t remember now, at some time it happened, but there was some kind of extreme situation. i can say that i led my first new year’s eve party, which i was invited to host, in a dress i sewed with my own hands. and i remember one of my... friend said, the next day, you know, you were wearing some kind of dress, damn, there’s a bow on the side, all of moscow speaks about this, i, of course, understood that the dress was made with my own hands, but i said how good it is that all of moscow is talking about me, there was some next event, something like that, some big event that i took part and again didn’t know what to wear, they told me that i needed to contact zaitsev and... moreover, there was a model house on kuznetsky most, and not on mira avenue, which was already his own, i came there and met a young man zaitsev, it

was he himself who invented this dress for me, but the most interesting thing is, then in moscow, he said: “you know, some kind of japanese silk has appeared in moscow, please buy 12 m, and i know what kind of dress to make for you, because it was march 8, and the silk was like, you know, like transparent chiffon, but in ... a dress that was incredible, with a gigantic skirt, translucent , flowing, with everything here gathered in honeycombs,

sleeves, everything was kind of modest on the one hand, on the other hand it was just fashion, real, something incredible , i later gave this dress to someone, i gave away a lot of my dresses to the presenters from other republics, well, which did not have their own vyacheslav zaitsev, my personal acquaintance with... mikhailovich began long before i saw him, because there were legends around the institute that vyacheslav mikhailovich would teach in our senior courses, and i saw him several times in the corridors of the institute, he was always in a hurry somewhere, running, we were no longer studying at the institute, we came to his fashion house, and there our training took place, there he looked at our sketches, there he gave us homework, parting words, instructions, scolded someone, praised someone , well, as usual in student life, we came there to take tests, but it was within the framework of the educational program, yes, this is the fourth or fifth year of the art university

where i studied , then it turned out that at... at some point, i don’t know why, vyacheslav mikhailovich began to somehow notice me, so, and in what way this was expressed, i don’t know, that is, he constantly seemed to me he praised me a lot, firstly, then he gave me the nickname leonardo, when i showed him, he gained the impudence, showed not only his work as, well, as a student, because i was already working quite a lot then, well, creatively, in addition to, so to speak, the institute program, i now gained the impudence to...

went out of fashion, after 20 years, i remembered vyacheslav mikhailovich and understood that then he again gave me very good advice, but then i didn’t listen to him, and then you were already studying at the fashion laboratory, and i was at the fashion laboratory, it was 2004, but how did you even get there? i came there completely by accident, because i didn’t plan to become a designer, i was on the subway, i looked recruiting for a fashion laboratory, i think, and quite by chance we went there, and there were these luxurious women who were like goddesses. they look fantastic, and at the same time absolutely adequate , it doesn’t smell like mothballs , they told everything, showed it, charmed me, naturally i ran, borrowed money urgently there, that means i came, the name of the hares and, well, that ’s right, this is a deity, well no one knows, i think that except for some fashion historians, what is the name of his collection, you went through

in general you know that it is complex, beautiful, there art. and i wanted to go there, and this whole year flies by, well, my whole life, that is, it ’s not just barely, you create, you create, it’s already in practice, that is, these are theories there , well, some kind of water ones, i taught them myself, of course, he came and made comments, and such as, even if he knew how, yes, yes, well, he’s flying there, that means everything is just like that - it’s fluffing up, god save it, he... flies, and you’re a genius you already consider yourself, you’re sitting there, you think, now he ’ll notice me, right now, look at this mannequin, this is art, it’s just a piece of his head, and he flies in and says, what kind of village neormak is this, well, and there are a couple of other words , he never skimped on yes, there ’s just a good deal of expression, that is he always spoke like a creature, and you think, well, this is brilliant, but the

harshest thing you heard from him, well, it’s not for broadcast. that will just cut out, tell us how your acquaintance with vyacheslav zaitsev began. in 1974, i was 12 years old, and my dad was the editor-in-chief student meridian magazine, and vyacheslav mikhailovich began to collaborate with this magazine, because it was the first such youth publication in the country, to collaborate like, he wrote something, he wrote articles about fashion, about youth. here are his works, his sketches , creative compositions like these, which were a creative source, as if to a sketch, as such

art, it’s in a frame on the wall, and absolutely ... fashion for trends, this is - imagine, this is the eighty-first year , and the first edition was in the seventy -fourth year, even then it was all there, so this is amazing, imagine, of course, the glory of zaitsev, he is an artist with a capital letter, and we are now modern designers, drawing a working sketch with one hand.

i bought it, it was ready, sewn for a show at some event, but i also needed it for a very important event, and i asked vyacheslava mikhailovich that i needed to add something there, to decorate it somehow, these you see, such brooches, not brooches on the shoulders, yes, yes, we did it later, that is, the whole back is also bare, and since we could not find two such symmetrical brooches, then here vyacheslav mikhailovich suggested what we should take.

there are not enough of them, well, in general, they restored the palace at someone else’s expense, and then they had a big reception and also sold tickets for a lot of money, here are my friends who were there at that moment, they were very interested in it, they bought tickets and me including being invited, and this dress was by chance with me, i have a photograph where - i talked with prince chart, who is now king charles, yes, i have a photograph of this dress with the king, they asked about your dress in general at the reception? no, but i visually saw that i looked absolutely worthy, in no way inferior to the other ladies who were there,

well, maybe in the diamonds on my fingers, of course , or in the ears of this one , well, there are family jewels, yes, but not in the dress, definitely not inferior at all, that is, it was absolutely at the highest world level, but how did vyacheslav zaitsev treat his colleagues in the workshop, did you discuss something in other countries? we no, we certainly didn’t discuss it, because he also communicated with them quite little, he didn’t have there was such an opportunity, opportunities appeared when he met cardin, and corden loved him very much, and i know that he directly admired his work, not only because he is a person with taste and a really good designer, but also because he is such a a person who was always present in all his collections.