matrons who accused him there, such a secular choice, it doesn’t matter, yes, well, listen, she seems to be well-read, she’s discussing such things, yes, she’s well-read, she, look, scarlett, she kind of spits on this society when she’s being bullied i gradually taught her not to give a damn about this society, no, she was always like that, well , listen to her, she was such a spinner, and she didn’t care if she offended her friends, scolded her mother, well, yes, she always did. she just developed it, that is, when it’s just some secular conventions, it’s one story, when she needs money, she trades syanki, it’s already different, when she marries this, everything is completely different, in a sense , melanie too, she goes against society, not with such a challenge, not so shocking and not so, she looks like scarlet she really doesn’t give a damn, she doesn’t give a damn about them, but she still sees, they are like them, you think that they are a mirror of each other, well, somehow, of course, not quite a mirror, but they are from the same cloth, conditionally. "a very interesting look, by the way,

for some reason they seemed very different to me, it seemed to me that this was a type of noble woman, melanie, a real lady, and scarlett is such a punk, well, you see, in terms of strength, independence , support for her own opinion, her own moral coordinates, well, everyone has them, even scarlett, it doesn’t matter, they may just be different, but they are somehow similar , well actually. she will say, although she hates soap as a rival all her life, she still helps her out, that is, there are these moments that she helps her give birth, well, that is, in general, this is such loyalty in a good way, few people in general, you see, she is faithful to the earth, she is generally faithful to her family, and she is faithful melanie, and it seems to me that this is only because ashley asked, she has this , you know, who, if not me, she went there for this kind of carrot, in general , she fed her family.

didn’t let them, uh, die of hunger, but there is a moment where michul describes that scarlett, while managing this estate, is forced, she suddenly realizes that she is no worse than a man, she says to herself, i’m no worse than a man, i can manage with the estate, keep the books there, distribute responsibilities between the household there, yes, she still has it society. her south, well, this is high society , yes, she inspired that a woman is weak, stupid, she is stupider than a man, this is frankly what they say, then suddenly she realizes that she, she can, she is no worse, and that’s in general, maybe it also somehow turns something around in her mind, do you think this is a feminist book in its essence, well, listen, we... now

we live in a time when the word feminism has already become a little bit of some kind of slogan , a little beaten, i beg you, are you avoiding him? well no, i'm not avoiding him, but yes, of course she is naturally, especially for that time, i think that it was michell who laid this out, yes, but you know, there is nothing ostentatious here, because these are all well, the realities of that life are very conventionally invented, you know, when the names are changed, yes, look, by the way, about being a lady, yes, there’s a lot there... it’s etiquette, interesting things that are pointed out, there a woman should not accept anything except sweets and flowers as a gift, a woman should not be left alone, she should not mention your pregnancy there, well, that is, in general, quite funny today today, well, listen, everything about sweets and flowers here is of course clear, so in general it seems to me that the topic is more relevant now, yes, well, as if the topic is interesting, yes , what can you accept from a man, it seems to me that you want to accept.

all these rules, and yet, we love her, we like her, we even think it ’s cool that we have lady rules, in general, when even i think the book came out, it was more relevant, of course , still closer to the middle of that century, it seems to me that we lack, well, girls lack these rules, well, at least know them, well, what are you missing, well, look, there is i, it seems to me that there is a male psychology that has not changed since those times, and there is such a certain approach to men that is conditional... if you follow these rules , then they

really still work, that is, you can make a choice that i don’t want to follow these rules, and i won’t, but nevertheless these rules exist and it would be good to know them, well, for example there. she's the first to confess her love, let's go, well, there's no need to conventionally hang yourself on a man's neck to confess, well, because you're in this situation you won’t achieve success, here you have achieved it, well, that’s it, listen, it seems to me that everything depends, yes, if we are talking, now we will go a little beyond the limits of being blown away by the wind, but it all depends on specific two people, so if i hang myself on a person’s neck, which, well, is not mine , well, it will cover me like it was with carly tseshlin, yes... for 2 days with such situations, well, in the sense that if i understand that something does not work out, goodbye, well, that means not my person, this can manifest itself, you know, in some even everyday little things, in looks, i don’t know, like those blown away by the wind , yeah, but because if you have reciprocity,

and you were the first to say it, and the person is exactly the same for you, he just didn’t have time , then everything will be fine with you, listen, well - in such a patriarchal-abusive way of life, where a woman must be quiet, submissive, obey, it is not clear what to get in return for this, because already in modern society you really do not understand that before there was some kind of public unspoken agreement, what kind of you have it, now you don’t, you can get it for this is whatever you want, you can get gratitude for it, i don’t know, some nice things for yourself, but you can only get it on the head, that is, you consider this rule meaningless, well, it’s meaningless only if you still hope for some kind of way of life, if you want it, including all its negative

characteristics just in case, then of course you have to live just like that. okay, let ’s discuss one more rule when you flirt with a man, well, i ’m saying this from scarlett’s point of view. mm you're flirting with a man, then you must definitely seem stupider than you are, which is the biggest disaster, everything goes down the drain in this seduction, in this hunt, if suddenly a man realizes that you are smart, it seems to me that this is very offensive, but this is uh , well, most likely it’s true, well, most likely it’s true in the sense that if it suddenly seemed to me that i was communicating with a man, and what, uh, what... in front of him i need to pretend that i’m stupider, yes, whatever it means, i would immediately understand that this man is stupid, and i can’t be with him along the way, because i’ll just die of boredom with him, i know when after 15 minutes, before that he wildly, no, well, this, this is if i

experienced intense romantic feelings for someone , something didn’t work out for me, i the person was disappointed, he was disappointed in me, we just didn’t stick together, yes, this is my minimal crush, yes, but here it’s about... well, it’s like it’s still at the level of reconsidering , but taking a closer look, well, that’s it, but i understand that he is stupid, i don't want to be a stupid person, only if he is uncontrollably cheerful, cool and talented, but then he most likely won’t behave like that either, because he will want to be stronger, he wants to be smarter, instinctively, a man wants a woman to be weaker, there is no such instinct at all, it’s all a design, a design that served certain needs. that is, you think this is described in gone with the wind , an artificial construction, well, that’s how it is - now we’re talking, we’re going back to gone with the wind, there is a construction such that, uh, a family is a working man, working so as to provide not only for himself and somehow his wife, but also for his family, well, that is

, children being born, no matter how many of them there are, some servants, but this is at the very least, but one way or another he needs all this for take it out for yourself. the wife, accordingly , does not work, she is completely immersed in the household, well, this is also work, listen, managing the household, she does not work at the job that brings the family money, in this sense she does not work, yeah, yes, i understand, that means people live only this way, yes, this is a social contract, let's be honest, that does only housework , some enjoy it, but a significant number of people are bored, uh-huh, so that all this somehow... to justify various add-ons begin, yes, from the very beginning a woman is trying not to put a lot of education into her, there is the same english aristocracy, how brilliant and falluust spoke, wrote, showed, and a bunch of other authors, both fiction and documentary, sometimes were in general

a principlecracy, they literally were there until the 20th century, they could be simply monstrously uneducated, well actually, yes already thank you. not the whole society , so i mean that some kind of nobility can also be compared with the british, and they generally tried to drag the woman away, well , because it kind of gives rise to vain thoughts, not about how to embroider or beat egg whites, but about the fact that you have some kind of purpose here and there, well, yes, so that she can do it fully and not get bored, about this directly, that she got married twice, gave birth to several children, that is... in the film they removed the script of these children and left only the last boney, who died, in

in the book she has a child from each marriage , in general it turns out that she gets married and gives birth to children, yes, yes, yes, she had a son, well , in general, having married several times to different men, and having given birth, she she didn’t reveal her sexuality at all, in general , maybe this is one of the reasons why she was in love with this ashley, that is, she had this romantic childhood... with rhett, she wasn’t there either, that she she didn’t really leave his bedroom, although

in general quite a lot of attention was paid to the description of what hit her, yes, that is she felt that this was not at all what she thought about this whole war, before that she thought that this was some kind of duty of a woman that she was forced to endure in marriage, yes, well, before that everything was clear, well, how would she really there is no positive experience, plus this experience is not at all...

about the fact that she has not revealed herself as a woman , it turns out, yes, well, look, somehow scarlett, it seems to me, maybe michel too, somehow they are not very about sex, well, about mi, that i can’t know, well, you know, it seems to me that when you read a book, you’re already all about a person you know, you still understand that who knows? here we can’t be sure, but it’s not really about sex in this book, well, that is, scarlett has some kind of even after her relationship with ret, she doesn’t have any strong interest in sex in this topic, but this is her , well, let's put it this way, an inexplicable romantic love for ashley, but in general it says that she has not revealed herself as a woman, because this is all an unrealistic story that she believes in, that is, it seems to you that... if a woman is so i'm unrequitedly in love, especially on throughout her life into a man

who rejects her, there is some kind of closedness behind this, well, look at it, there’s such a mix, yes, scarlett, obviously, that’s who is not about reflection, it’s her, this is it , two, right there , between her first upset about ashley , he gave himself to another, yes, yes, he married another. books, he clung to memories, and about his former life, and she, as if she

had some kind of connection with her former life, she clung to ashley, it was her connection, he was her gateway, you know, in some... that landmarks, in some sweet dreams, in which she was still, of course, like a spoiled girl from a rich family, of course she was in them, what worries she had, just to fight off the next groom from her friend and ashley. absolutely right, the whole dress, choosing a dress, yes, choosing the right dress for the event, yeah, everything develops so non-linearly for them. the dress was made from a curtain in difficult times to get 300 dollars of tax out of rat butler, a couple of years ago, i went to learn to sew, but i still, seriously, yes, i already know how, but not as well as i want, i’m such a friend to everyone they told me, girls, we don’t throw away curtains, if anything happens, here, if anything happens, i’ll sew outfits for you, this is

the right skill, listen , how clever you are, you know, by the way, very often... some people didn’t finish reading, but i find it very difficult to read philosophers in general, especially for people with such a discrete consciousness, for example, who writes what, but it seems to me that some of them , yes, the syllable is heavy, maybe the translation is bad, and some of them are just fascinating fiction, almost oh, well, what to read,

what kind of literature, well, this whole korenin, well , listen, it’s still the will of a woman, well, like the guy tolstoy, it ended like that, but still. there, a woman, in general, shows an iron will in the pursuit of happiness, one way or another, and the same vanity fair, strong characters, emilia, in general, is also strong in some sense, uh, gone with the wind, yes, just optics, what, this is what your optics are, then they read to you, if you want to find in everything how you became a victim , you will be a victim all your life, everyone offends you, in you were bullied at school, and your mother insulted you, and even your psychotherapist insults you. you know, well, it’s like everything, you have such optics, yes , no matter what you read from scarlett - this is the antiposition of the victim, this is just the position of a strong person, and it’s also interesting that the woman’s optics there is still a great novel, exactly about the time of crisis that falls on any crisis situation, the reality of destruction and change, and how a woman behaves and how a woman sees this crisis and how

she survives in it, that is , mitch herself said that she...

well, when i went through the stage of the carlsons, yes , well, children's, modern, not modern, yes, well, basically a person begins to read, if he went there at all, with the classics, almost all the classics are written by men, i, for example, jane i read austen, you know, well, 27 or 30 years ago, i somehow, i didn’t even know that she existed, yes, and it didn’t change anything in my life, taking into account the fact that at that time, because most the writers were men, yes, and this...

well, it seems to me, yes, she understands, look, it’s still somewhere under the layers of time, yes, under the layers of fashion or something like that, character - people have the same, well, the same passions. passions, vices, that is, in this novel there is truth, there is, there is character, the most important thing is that she has very cool multi-faceted characters, in essence it is a pop novel, but it is

great, as if pop, as if you said that it bad, well, this is an example of pop, when it’s good, wait, war and peace is pop, no, the most popular book in the world, well, among the most popular is a book? and here is a ladies' romance, why is it a ladies' romance, well wait, because he shows women's optics, doesn't he, i don't understand, here we are just now, i told you, i don't understand what women's optics are about, takirey has the same women's optics, that's how much snot balkonsky let out, how much snot let the bezukhovs in, the fat one has bigger men, his heroes in the sense, not not all the characters in general, and they all went, in general, ashley is also true, also of great character? well, apart from the real generals described and kutuzov there, he doesn’t have any male characters who have achieved anything,

well, at least internal growth, well, which of his characters has grown internally, no one, but do you agree that gone with the wind is a great novel, yes, of course, i agree, thank you for the interesting conversation, and thank you, i’m so glad to finally see you , books in general, i don’t want to leave here. it’s interesting to talk, but no one understands this, well, that is, i want to directly show - in our program, a must-read, that books are very interesting, and it shows life from completely different sides, and it is very modern, this podcast is a must-read reading, i'm glaina batnikova, today we discussed the novel gone with the wind, margaret mitchell, and the most beautiful novel about the war of the north and south in america with... arina kholnaya blogger.

hello, the theater podcast is live and i, its host anton getman. today we have a special issue in which we will talk about the legendary belgian. how he managed to make opera the way we see it today, why he remains a role model for theater managers around the world, how he influenced the fate of the most prominent representatives of musical theater today, about this and more, we will talk with our guest, the founder and artistic director of eterna music, an outstanding...

theodore, hello, hello, gerard martier, a legendary figure, i think, who played. the performance of those times had a huge large-scale scenery and so on and so forth, we worked 24 hours a day with dimitri to

create. then i did a co-production of makbed, which we created together with chernyakov, a novosibirs co-production with the opera bastikh, and this is the first time, i remember, when the french came to novosibirs, because they made the scenery together, and it was minus 50°, they walked

like the first man on the moon simply. down the street, it was very, and mortier, i remember when i arrived - in paris and carlo was prime minister, he was so delighted that he became, as it were, my mentor, a man who talked about me on every corner and discovered me , in fact, big in europe, we had very close friendly relations, he was like...

the old world, which he, in principle, did not want to reform the opera. the point is that if you look dispassionately. in history

in the art of the 20th century, we will see what evolution happened in cinema, yes, and the cinema was played with grimaces, they all looked like grimaces, then cinema became some kind of author’s art , i don’t know anymore, the 60s of the opus.

and in the open world of directors who, in principle, could take this stunning musical fabric to a completely different level. assistance from the director's plan, yeah, and therefore even until the seventies and my first experiences in opera, when i was little, and walked, there was some kind of wretched archaic bad taste, and the poses of the singers, those with a hypertrophied ego, who come out later, this, of course, i’m not saying that this is bad.

then at some point on stage we will have to make some decision, yeah, do we want to please the public taste today, do we want to be accepted for what we are doing to feed the audience our desires, or do we want to do something that they can don’t understand now, but it will give...

there is a theater podcast on the air and today we are talking about gerard martier with theodor kurendis. martier has one of his concepts, well, perhaps one of his key concepts, it was a director's theater, it was a theater

based on the director's concept on dramaturgy, because like a hacker he hacked into the conservative opera system and introduced the director into the production team as one of...

together yolanda and yolanda and persifona in the theater real, and we were there and after the success of this production, mortier said to peter: go visit theodore, i lived on the plaza oriente there, and talk about the future, you have carte blanche, do everything.

your music festival was absolutely the same, tell me, what has changed, here,

when you called him, you had some task, so that he would help, so that he would breathe some new life, so that he would set an example, he had absolutely amazing intuition, in principle, we are the result of this intuition of this person, which he dreamed of seeing some new picture in the world, did not always work out, in general... this is not the one who is the creator of brilliant performances, but there were brilliant performances at mortier and there were unsuccessful performances, he himself said that this was an unsuccessful performance, he told me personally, and he said that the scandal does not frighten me in any way, if i know that it is a good performance, then what he did, he opened these boundaries. and gave the opportunity to see a work of art in

another territory, they removed from this narrow museum-like environment that the opera was located, and he put the opera in another space, you did the same thing in kurma then, you also changed not only the theater, you also changed the audience , yes, but i did it when i was first appointed, i had already worked with mortt before that. a long time ago from novosibirsk he worked with mortier, naturally he influenced me very much, this is the principle of how to look, how to breathe and how to open your boundaries, create no answers, the question creates new questions, art is for us to create new questions, and not for everyone to answer everything, you are very much in this similar in what you did to what you came up with and did? martya, here are the formats that you did in

perm, i mean, in particular at the dyagerev festival, these concerts in the early morning, concerts when the audience listens to music lying on mattresses, these are unusual circumstances in which you place musicians and audience. what is the task? to bring the audience out of a state of comfort, or vice versa, to place them in such a state that... i believe that one of the most unfortunate constitutions in art, in the art world, is a museum, why? because when all artists create a work of art, they create it under certain conditions, for example, a rebrant paints under, i don’t know. ten candles, uh-huh, and here, naturally, his

painting looks a certain way, with warm light, uh-huh, yes, for example, cezan, he created naexan provence, his work is pre-daylight, yes, in his garden, naturally, with cold light, it looks as it should, but imagine, now all these masterpieces will be collected, one museum will collect and put some kind of general cold light on everyone ...

we seem to combine ancient chant and modern music together.