in the russian presidential elections, including those who perform combat missions in the special operation zone. for example, in the dpr, fighters of the twenty-ninth combined arms army of the group of troops had such an opportunity. this month she was awarded the title of guards for the massive heroism of her personnel. polling stations were opened at the positions of the southern group of troops. this is footage from the other end of the country on the kuril islands of paromushyr and shumshu, the lighthouse keepers of the pacific fleet voted ahead of schedule. the commission members arrived.

planned to use it for economic development, social sphere 8 trillion, and then increased these expenses, i think that it is quite likely that if everything turns out as the optimists say, from this environment that i mentioned, experts, then we can and should be able to increase these expenses according to ... in various directions, that is, we are talking about a six-year period, that’s right, we are talking about a six-year period, we are now increasing the budget for a three -year period, for a three-year period, as we say, a planned period, but of course, we are all uh, when we were preparing for the message, i say, we were preparing for the message, because the whole team is working, we proceeded from the fact that... we will calculate

our income and expenses in those areas that we consider key, priority for 6 years, but still there are literally stunning projects, for example, the sochi highway dzhubaga is 130 km, of which 90 km are tunnels, the rest is probably bridges, so, judging by the landscape, 3 billion, 1.5 billion in the first 3 years. only, the track should ideally be ready in 1930, that is, in general, how necessary is this and will there be enough for people to win? necessary this time, because families with children cannot get to suchi by car, everyone stops somewhere in the novorossiysk region, because the route is very difficult. serpentine

, there are several options for construction there , we will discuss this literally the other day , in the next few days, either do it before dzhubga, dzhubga, or first do it from dzhubga to sochi, so do it in stages, some members of the government propose, others believe that it should be done immediately that's all, because otherwise there will be a narrow neck from the jubga. on socha, the first part, if you look from novorossiysk, it’s more or less like decent coverage, not bad, but very narrow, and if we do the same as the first part to sochi, then in this small space there may be traffic jams, of which there are quite a lot now , in general, this... we will determine with

specialists what stages, but it needs to be done, we need to determine, of course, the final cost of the project, to achieve it. people, and the economy, the development of the territory on these financial plans, first of all, the interests of ensuring that everyone remains within the framework in the south of the country, this is very important, but we can afford such large-scale investments in the school, which means the country is rapidly getting richer, especially in the conditions of the northern military district, in the conditions of almost 15 thousand absolutely wild sanctions, and even more so we set ourselves another...

federal the republic of germany took its place, the fifth largest economy in the world, the german economy shrank by 0, i think 3% over the past year, and we grew by 3.6%. japan has grown by a small percentage, but

if everything continues to develop at the same pace, like today, we have every chance to take the place of japan and become the fourth economy. perspective, but even here we must say honestly, and in the short term , objectively, there is a difference between the qualities of our economy, in terms of the priority of purchasing power, that is, in terms of volume, we are really now fifth, and there is every chance of taking the place of japan, but the structure of the economy of these countries, it certainly differs favorably from ours, we still have a lot to do in order not only to buy at parity. abilities, but per capita we had a decent position, first, second, so that the structure itself changes, so that it becomes much more efficient, more modern, more innovative, this is what we will work on, and as for income, but at the cost of purchasing abilities, this is a very important

indicator, this is the volume, size of the economy, this means that the state , through the tax system at all levels , receives funds to solve strategic problems. said about it, structure, that's what we're working on must work, and many people depend on it, the future of our economy, the future of labor resources, efficiency, labor productivity depend on it,

one of the main tasks today is to increase labor productivity, because in conditions of a shortage of workers, labor resources, we there is. there is only one way of effective development, to increase labor productivity, this in turn means that we must increase the innovative start of the economy, let’s say, increase the density of robotization, here we have today 10 robots, in my opinion, per 10,000 workers, but there needs to be at least 1.00 robot workers, in my opinion. this is how things are in japan, in my opinion, that is, but in order for people to be able to work on such new technology, well, not only to use robotics, but also other modern means of production, they need to be trained, another problem arises, this is personnel training, so for this, we have a whole area

designated, including engineering training, well, you probably noticed that we now have 30 of these modern engineering schools across the country have already been launched, this year we are launching 20 more and there will be 50 and we are planning 50 more in the coming years, so in these areas, this is our future.

how is it here, how big is our margin of safety in the conditions of the arms race,

in fact? here we need to ensure that for every ruble invested in the defense industry we get the maximum return. indeed, during the soviet era, no one counted these expenses, no one was chasing efficiency, unfortunately, defense expenses amounted to about 13% of the gdp of the country of the soviet union. but, i will not refer to our statistics, we will refer to the stockholm institute, last year our defense spending was 4%, this year it is 6.8, that is, we have grown by 2.8%. in principle, this is a noticeable increase, but absolutely not critical, well, in the soviet union it was 13%, and now we are 6.8, that’s it.

in that it not only indirectly influences the civilian industries, but itself , using the innovations needed for defense, it uses these innovations for production civilian products, this is an extremely important thing, but - firstly, our expenses themselves are, of course, incomparable, as in the united states, there are 800 of them,

the hole goes away, nothing can be counted there, that ’s where the main cutting takes place, although in production means of destruction , weapons, in general, money is also spent there that is difficult to estimate, if you count how much it cost, how much it cost us, how much it cost them, say, a well-known missile defense system, and one of one of them. .. main components overcoming the pro, on our part, the vanguard, the intercontinental, intercontinental

missile, the planning block of the intercontinental range, well, just incomparable values, and we essentially nullified everything that they did, everything that they invested in this system about, in this way and we need to act, and of course... without any doubt, the very economy of our armed forces, it must meet today's requirements. vladimirovich, the word justice -

in what direction should we think? well you know indeed, the distribution of this tax burden, it should have been fair in the sense that the common treasury , as they say, for solving national problems, and above all for solving problems of combating poverty, should still be allocated more to corporations, legal and physical persons who earn more. now i would not like to go into details, we need to work on this, and thus we need to build this system so that it really gives a greater return for solving before in total social issues of the tasks facing the state in this area, well, we are planning

to reduce the tax burden there, for example for large families, also...

and last year became an anti-record year in terms of birth rate, and as you know, now the sales rate is one child per woman childbearing, but we’ll probably...

on the upward, well, in general, based on all the measures to support families with children, then over the next six years we plan to spend, well, through various channels, up to 14 trillion rubles, this is a huge amount of money, and areas of support families with children, there are a lot of them, starting with general social, construction or renovation of kindergartens. construction of new schools , renovation of new schools, renovation of old schools, restoration, order in accordance with the requirements of today, support for women from pregnancy to... until the child is 17 years old, because we have almost 400,000 women now receiving benefits, this is almost every third a woman who is expecting a child,

and more than 10 million children receive benefits, this is such a serious, serious thing, we continued, continued - the issuance system providing maternal capital, maternity capital, we continued payments well... now we are making decisions of 450 thousand rubles per family, if there is a third child to pay off the mortgage loan, we have retained mortgage loan benefits for - for families with children, in general there is a whole range of activities in very different areas with the aim of supporting families, and of course you have already mentioned this, this is... the fight against poverty, because, because, of course, uh, of course, it is much more difficult for families with children than for those

families where there are no children, this is understandable, the costs there are big ones, but nevertheless , we managed to do a lot in this area, look, here, and if you look at 20 years ago, we had uh... it was - in my opinion, 20 29% of the population , this is 42 million people, now 9.3 - this is according to the latest percentage data, but this is also 13.5 million people, of course, a lot, of course, everything needs to be done to reduce it to at least 7%, and for large families families... there is a more modest figure, but it should also be increased, but what do we proceed from when we talk about problems with the birth rate, well, i have already said this many times, and

experts say this, these are objective things, we had two very large declines in the birth rate during the great patriotic war, 1943-4, a comparable decline was immediately after the collapse of the soviet union, just one to one like that.

demographic dynamics, in all other countries everything is going negative, this is a complex problem related to the economy, to the life priorities of women, now it’s better not to get involved in this, let the demographers try and tell us, tell us decisions for us, but you know what still puts us in a positive mood, the mood in our society. 70% of men and 72% of women want to have two or more children, so the state must support them, this is a whole large

set, a set of support measures that we are planning, they definitely need to be implemented and we will do it, but still, that is there is no confidence yet that these measures will change the situation. in the late nineties, and this is a well-known story, you yourself talked about it, you saved your children from a fire, literally entered a burning house on the second floor, and then you remembered that there was money there somewhere else, but the money burned up in the fire, this speaks of your priorities. first the children, then the money, maybe now on a national scale it’s not even 14, but there it ’s all right, there’s such a program.

create in order to be guaranteed to turn this situation around , you know, this needs to be looked at as events unfold, as they say, at the beginning of the 2000s we took a number of steps in the field of demography, including the introduction of maternity capital and a number of other things, which gave an obvious positive result, which means we can achieve the normal goals we need, such experience is experience. of course, we have experience, and using this experience and other modern developments, we must still count on the fact that we will achieve the goals that we set for ourselves, and as events develop, we will adjust these measures or add to those measures which we will use, something else, well, for example, we just announced, here are families, we have a new national project,

family. there are elements there, elements that we have never used before, well, for example, 75 billion will be planned for those regions where the birth rate is lower than the national average, mainly the central regions of russia and the north-west, 75 billion is decent money, you just need to use it wisely, there is another component, which means caring for the elderly . there are other support measures, we need to raise the birth rate and increase life expectancy, then we will stabilize the country’s population, well here of course, well, this is the most important integral indicator of our successful or perhaps work that requires additional attention from all administrative

levels of bodies. yes, but everywhere in the world there is another third tool for solving demographic problems - this is immigration. what numbers can we talk about here in this six-year period and what does systematicity mean in this work? well, if we talk about migrant workers, we don’t have so many immigrants; compared to other countries, they make up 3.7% of the total number of workers. but ah they are concentrated in those regions where economic life is most active and there are of course an order of magnitude more of them, these are the moscow region, moscow, the northwestern region, some regions of the north, where the level of wages is decent, but without any doubt, this is a question which requires special attention from the authorities, both local, regional, and federal, here is what

i would like to say: this is a very important thing, because when migrant workers are attracted, they always talk about the need to do this in connection with shortage of labor, our entrepreneurs must understand that the situation for them in terms of the availability of labor will not change for the better in the coming years; they will face a shortage of workers. which means, in order to solve this problem radically, i am now returning to what we have already talked about, we need to increase labor productivity , reduce the number of workers in those areas where this can be done, achieving even greater results by introducing it into modern technology, but to do this, you need to invest in this area and prepare

personnel, well, we... we also already talked about this, this is the most important thing we need to think about, well, in general, of course, migration policy is an important tool in the economy, it’s not a sin to look at the experience of others countries, first of all, of course, we need to talk about the repatriation of our compatriots, what repatriation is and what compatriots are is already reflected in our regulatory framework, there is no need to repeat here, here we need to talk about attracting... people who, perhaps , are not going to move to russian federation, but due to their qualifications, due to their talents in various, in various fields, they can make a significant contribution to the development of our state, in various ways, to the development of russia, we will also be happy to attract such people, and as for traditional labor migrants, here we also need to think about how to prepare them for coming to russia,

including with our partners, in the countries where they live, this means studying the russian language, our traditions, culture, and so on , so that about them, about them here they cared and treated them humanely, so... the russian federation should come first ? well, the russians are probably the largest, divided nation in the world, so you

had a conversation with the leaders of russia, one of your interlocutors, one of your interlocutors said that in the zaporozhye region we discovered that they are just as russian as we are and for them it is today. some kind of revelation and well, in general, it’s really like that and we are now growing into new regions , odessa is a russian city, it’s probably big there is hope here, probably in this direction too, well, of course, the population density there in these regions has always been quite high, well... the climate is wonderful, as for donbass, it is an industrially developed region, back in the days of the soviet union, how much the soviet union invested in this region, its coal mining

industry, metallurgical industry, everything there is at a high level, yes, of course, investments are required there in order for everything to be modern, this is production. living conditions and working conditions of people were built completely differently, not the way it was a couple of decades ago, as for novorussia, this is a clearly defined region with a clearly developed agriculture, here we will do everything to support both traditional areas of activity and new ones that organically in

... "historically, it is absolutely obvious that the nazi regimes themselves do not dissolve, but disappear as a result of military defeat, this was the case in germany, in italy, in japan, the same thing will obviously happen with the bandera national regime, and we are now moving towards all front lines. judging by the message of our military correspondents from the ministry of defense, have we managed to find a way to fight when during an offensive our

losses are less than in defense, that is, this is a rather non-trivial task for the art of war, but... it always holds back an offensive, this frugality, completely justified in relation to our warriors by the hero, but this question arises, how to advance with minimal losses? the question is understandable and fair, but the answer is also simple: we need to increase funds damage, the number and power of weapons , increase the effectiveness of use.

in this direction, yes, this is what is happening, this is the answer to your question, the more powerful and more means of destruction, the less losses.

“we will feel insecure,

we will be a third- or fourth-class country , no one will take us into account if we cannot protect ourselves, and the consequences could be catastrophic for russian statehood, that’s the answer. vladimirevich, the americans seem to be talk about negotiations about strategic stability, but at the same time..." declares the need to inflict a strategic defeat on russia, our position sounds like we are open to negotiations, but at the same time, the time for kind gestures has passed, they are over, so there will be no negotiations, we never refused to negotiate, well, without...

an excerpt from this agreement, it is available, it was signed by the head of the negotiating group on the ukrainian side, mr. arakhamia, he did it, it’s his signature, here it is in our administration, but then it is known how mr. archamia himself told the world, publicly also at a meeting , in my opinion, with journalists, with foreign ones, even the former prime minister of great britain, mr. johnson came and dissuaded them from finally signing and

accordingly executing this agreement, she went the topic that you just mentioned is that russia needs to be defeated on the battlefield, are we ready for negotiations? yes, we are ready, but only for... ready for negotiations, not based on some kind of wishes, after the use of psychotropic drugs means, based on those realities that have developed, as they say on earth in such cases, this is the first, second - after all, we have already been promised many times,

they have promised not to expand nato to the east, then we will see, we will see them our borders, they promised, if we didn’t delve into history, they promised that the internal conflict in ukraine would be resolved by peaceful means. political, as we remember, three foreign ministers came to kiev, poland, germany and france, and promised that they would be these guarantors.

absurd on our part, but we are ready, nevertheless less to a serious conversation, and we want to resolve, resolve all conflicts, and especially this conflict, by peaceful means, but we must clearly and clearly understand for ourselves that this is not a pause that the enemy wants to take. for rearmament, and this is a serious conversation with security guarantees for the russian federation, and we know the various options that are being discussed, we know the carrots that they are going to show us in order to

convince us that the moment has come, we want, i repeat again. and we are ready for this, we want this, but this must be a serious conversation with ensuring security for the opposing side, and in this case, we are primarily interested in the security of russia, the russian federation, so we will proceed from this. “it seems to me that we somehow look too noble, we won’t succeed in such a way that they will once again, we will conclude something with them, and they will once again deceive us, and we will console ourselves with the fact that, well to be honest, they deceived us, that our fate in the end to remain fools all the time, but

wait, but since the americans, they have minted medals for themselves." "

i'm afraid that you will be quoted in broad terms, you don't trust anyone at all, or you mean western partners, in this case, when you say that you don’t trust anyone, well, i prefer to be guided by facts rather than good wishes, and talk about how everyone can be trusted, because you understand, when you make a decision at this level, the degree of responsibility for the consequences accepted decision is very high, so we will not do anything that does not correspond to the interests

of our country, but what happened to macron, he’s gone crazy, he’s acting like... western countries have been present in ukraine for a long time, they were present even before the coup , and after the coup d’etat, their number increased multiple times.

then i’m sure this will not change the situation on the battlefield, this is the most important thing, just as the supply of weapons does not change anything, secondly, this can lead to serious geopolitical consequences, because if, say, polish troops will enter the territory of ukraine for what... it sounds like cover - the ukrainian-belarusian, say, border or some other places in order to free up

ukrainian military contingents to participate in hostilities on the line of contact, then i think that the polish the troops will never leave there, well, it seems to me so, in this case then -

but the problem is different, this is the well-known wagner group, it first carried out a number of

economic projects in syria, then moved to other african countries, the ministry of defense provides support, but only based on the fact that this is a russian group , nothing more, we did not push anyone out, it’s just that african leaders of some countries agreed with russian economic operators, wanted to work with them, did not want to work with the french in anything, it was not even our initiative, it was an initiative on the part of our african friends, but it is unclear why they would be offended at us in this regard if an independent state wants to develop relations.