because he doesn’t achieve, soviet cinema was always guided by the fact that the hero must come to some kind of result, albeit a tragedy, but an optimistic one, otherwise it shouldn’t be, yes, but he came to a tragedy in the full sense of the word, because he didn’t find the way to himself, why does he die in the end, he has many options, and if you remember, at the beginning of the film, this option shukshin...

says where, i don’t remember where he is, because from myself it’s not that even from myself you leave, the fact is that he doesn’t need another territory in order to deal with himself, he can’t figure it out with himself, because he’s fixated on life, that’s the problem, he still internally remains a sixties man, we gathered our thoughts about viburnum red, you makarovich, eastwood has one of the main themes of his work - this is also a person who follows his line, let’s say, yes, he does the right thing. he doesn’t look at

what’s around him, he must go across, an american hero, yes, in this sense if we take the plot of, say, this picture, and not only the plot twists, but also the aesthetics in many ways, in my opinion, this is absolutely the aesthetics of the american western, that is, the hero for a reason unknown to us, this, by the way, is also a problem, so i’m reconsidering how many times, what he is suddenly tormented so much, well, that is, he is a repeat offender, yes, an age crisis, it is doubtful, the hero comes out of prison, understands that he cannot live like this, there is money, there is money. yes, a harness, he tries to arrange it first in the environment in which he is used to, but it doesn’t work, and then this yearning of the soul leads to repentance, to death, if we remember the film grantorino, for example, yes, i also wanted to say, grantorino, when he is a hero in the end , yes, in the end he allows himself to be killed, yes, that means, and thereby, in fact, in this case, the hero shukshan finds his place among the birches of his beloved ones; in my opinion, this is absolutely not a regional story. he, having met

with birch trees, with his daughters-in-law, he says: i will be nearby, he actually greets them, he says goodbye to them, this is not his find, this is not his path, not his opportunity to get out of the situation in which he found himself , as for why he came out, well, he was a repeat offender, he came out of prison, what’s wrong, he wants to become a farmer, let him be, but it has nothing to do with it at all. this hero is not a repeat offender , this is not a social hero, this is shukshin, in general shukshin did not succeed for a very long time, but with the exception of such a guy lives, of course, this is just a wonderful movie, based on such a revelation of innocence, but he did not succeed, because he himself was not in the frame, and it’s a miracle that kuravlev left to film in 17 moments of spring to play - and kuravlev had to play in the stove benches, yes. throwing up his hands, feeling

that he had been betrayed, he began to play himself and he entered the frame as a hero with his own problems, prokudin’s problems are the problems of shukshin, and not of some social hero, i agree here, but we are more likely talking about the fact that shukshin more than an actor, a director or not, that’s not the point, that’s what the movie is about, etovich, but what about a holiday, a holiday, like which one exists, yes, after all, there is a question at the limit, but does it exist? holiday. he is tormented all the time by this question, because he does not understand what a holiday is, he goes through trial and error, mistakes, yes, and complete mistakes, he does not make a single right decision, except perhaps one correct decision to leave life, because he has dried up, because he can’t move on, he doesn’t know how, that ’s his worst problem, if you remember, one of his last conversations... i forgot what

the hero’s name was, but he just appears on split seconds near the boat, they stand and they talk, and after what is called fate has come for him, in the person of one of these bandits, he says: and does it, the point is not that it is anti-soviet or not anti-soviet, this is not a question for shukshin at all , is that this picture is about a person who wants to understand himself, himself, finds it difficult to do this, based only on the realities of life, he achieves a lot, but

he does not really find true love with anyone, because an incredible thing happens to anyone, if anyone was paying attention picture, she has, when he...

others, this is generally the threshold of razin in a sense, and razin is not a russian robber, i came to give you inner freedom, he is smarter than many, as shukshin said, he understands more about that, what was happening around him, that’s why he was important, this is not an intellectual razin, naturally, but this is a razin who understands something about himself, he belongs to this razin, and prokudin is an intermediate step, this is some kind of step towards.. murazin, which he unfortunately didn’t get to, didn’t get to, holiday, about the holiday, or maybe about the soviet, that’s all. tell me about the soviet, in my opinion, this is precisely in this sense a soviet film, because - here, if we remember, especially the seventies, yes, this is a set of certain such symbols, every house should have

a kremskaya, yes, if we are talking about the civil war there, then this is kolchak and so on, this is all that we remember about the civil war at the time of the seventies. someone wrote in one article that why he dies, why he kills the hero, because in soviet realities this hero has no

future, in a sense he is right - this the viewer, in which i will explain, the fact is that whoever takes him is a collective, this is a gang. this is a lip slayer, the leader of a gang, he could not become himself, because this collective took its toll, and this, by the way, also how it took it, you remember, there one of his girlfriends shouts, why, yes, that it shouldn’t be like that, no need, she squeaks, uh-huh, to which the gubashlyab says, this is how it should be, this is how it should be, this is a person who knows the social world, who knows how to behave in it, and he takes it away. no one, he didn’t send anyone, he came himself, the leader, he came and killed, this is very important, this is very important, because i read a lot where thieves and so on wrote to shukshin, the film is cool, but the ending is absolutely, this does not happen, that if

he wants to leave, they were so, so to speak, under impression, no, well, in life, you want to leave, yes, well, no one will kill you, but he, this is exactly, this is a parable level, yes, this is from some. the whole point is that this is not about a criminal hero, this parabola was built much more interesting than the plot basis itself, well because otherwise it would have been a grotesque ending, how... gave such a reaction, indeed, and he even had a few months to live, and

of course, it made an incredible impression on him, but people didn’t decipher what impressed them right away, it was so it was serious at that moment, if you look at the reviews of those years, very serious, interesting critics wrote, what a character, what a hero, an amazing ending, what is it about, no one wrote about it, because it was so ahead of its time, we are asking now these questions to yourself. how she speaks to lyuba with his

correspondence correspondent, yes he comes out and he, in principle, this is a prayer, this is a prayer of repentance, this is not lord, my god, but lord, he says, forgive me, yes, this is on, by the way, in what other in soviet cinema, the hero says, lord, forgive me, yes, no, this is a prayer of repentance, and there is a church in the background, a church, this is not in a field, a difficult topic for shukshin, this is not in a field. a race in width, a race in width, not in height and not in depth, about, about, let's,

by the way, look at the race, people for debauchery gathered, oh my god, my god, just girls with peaches. “dear man, you still explain to us what we are celebrating, well , uncles and aunts, let’s start eating, the question is in the film story, as i understand it, this is a director’s script, yes, that’s just what we called it in the soviet union, it’s been remade, yes , but the film story was such a genre even , in the film story, he has a whole speech here, he says that we are people here, let’s love each other, because i love you.

in relations with myself, more significant than mitya karamazov, i’ll take yourself like this a careless opportunity to say, yes, because yes, let me not allow you, and nevertheless, because he, there is no need to narrow him down, he narrowed himself, you know, he, he himself came to the point that what he arranged a holiday is tinsel, he already says that it is tinsel, he understands that this is not what it is, and the only thing... he can rely on is such a pantheistic motive associated with birch trees, to which he also went for a long time, after all

, this is also three times, this is a very thoughtful dramaturgy, first he comes out, tries with he can’t talk to them, because the crows are bothering him, if you remember, the second time lyuba bothers him with her conversations about her first husband, he says: what vaselissa is growing up, it’s time to give birth, then there is such a powerful erotic motive in this, he’s trying to connect this. today we gathered our thoughts about kalina krasnaya and vasily makarovich shukshin, lev maratovich karakhan, sergei vladimirovich vereikin, i am vladimir ligoi, and we continue. can we say that, by and large, and also surprisingly, there is not one, but two gospel stories of the prodigal son and

the repentant thief. well, with the prodigal son , everything, everything is clear, although right there again. here is what we started talking about, a mixture of real history and screen ones, yes, like us, if we remember the fate of the heroine, this one, who played, well, didn’t play, actually talked about herself, yes, which you mean mom, yes , this is a document, by the way, an amazing thing, yes, how organic it looks with documentary sound, with this yes, that is, for me in this sense it is just biblical the story of the prodigal son, because she perceived shukshan, as you know, as her own, she was extremely worried when he died. in principle, she called him son, and for her the real prodigal son who left her, we are talking from the side of the son always, yes, here also from the side, in fact, in this case of the mother, and for her this return took place, she never i didn’t see my own son, who was missing, but shukhshin for her was the son who returned to her, about the robber, here i probably agree with alv aratovich, here

in general, but the robber is not so obvious, that is, he actually is for me, i’ve watched it a lot, perhaps... that’s why the first part of the picture about robbers, it ’s like that, yes, forgive me, the late gaidai, but in general, rather filmed in his vein, yes, here it is - such a deliberate popular thieves' raspberry, here is the pardelier, again mentioned so deliberately, and even if you remember the episode when after the raspberry the police are chasing them and he is hiding on the embankment , like cartoons, these policemen , yes, the police are like cartoons, shukshin himself, he suddenly he makes such moves with his feet, well, it’s more like the hero ivan vasilyevich changes his profession.

didn’t get there, this race in width , no, how to say, then in razin , even in the very novel that he wrote, the width turns into breadth, this is a little different , but still this concept is on the personal life of the specifics of life, but he couldn’t feel that it was impossible to touch spiritual matter with his hands, he tried.

torkovsky has a completely different outcome, where the hero dies because he encountered such vital material from which one cannot help but die, but he dies in order to live, and he lets go of this bird, which flies away, well, this may be too much even for torkovsky, such a direct symbol, and the holy spirit, but he speaks almost inaudibly , i several times - when i looked at the picture for the first time several times, i did not notice these words at all. he says, everything will be, he opens a new life, what arseny torkovsky in his poem, which sounds in this film, life, life, is exactly what he says about that there is still life, life, not only life, but shukshin’s hero ran into life, he didn’t feel this life, life, didn’t discover it for himself, this is his tragedy, because

, well, let’s say, like this, yes, here the classic picture of gadar at the last breath, there is a famous dialogue with patricia, which is conducted by the hero puacar, played by belmando, she asks him, what do you choose, sadness or death, he says: i choose death, sadness is a compromise, that is... that’s all that matters for prokudin, and this is an existential choice, quite, i choose myself, there is no god, let's go, but here an existential choice is impossible, because for him death is a compromise, he is a losing hero, yeah. that's the thing, he was maximalist, and there 's an amazing episode when he goes on a hydrofoil, no, he says, maybe.

cannot fit this breadth into some kind of internal message, into a spiritual movement, he tries to do it nevertheless, but at the same time these are his words of repentance, yes, when god forgive me, right there when he says: give me time, this this it sounds somehow crazy, he says: at least let my hair grow back, but what does your hair have to do with it, well, it’s like... suddenly the same student writes to me, says, remember, we watched the film kalina krasnaya, i just rewatched what amazing movie, recommend me something else from

soviet films, well, films of the soviet era, yes, so that, and i, you know, i wanted to ask you in conclusion, let’s recommend something, from non-soviet, soviet, to our very students , there are 20... 1 2 3 what would you now end up with as a result our conversation, they could advise them to look at torkovsky’s mirror, i don’t know how much it won’t frighten, let’s say, a twenty-twenty one-year-old person, but in my opinion it’s worth at least trying to look at something from herman alexei sr. accordingly, i would recommend it, because again, it will probably make you think about what soviet cinema is, and expand these... so i would at least start with this, and then we’ll see, and then we’ll see, ref maryvich, and since we're talking about students, i i would recommend pedagogical cinema

, because the mirror and herman, i think , will be watched one way or another, because these are basic paintings that, one way or another, people touch them sooner or later, and there is a wonderful painting by ilya werbach, other people’s letters , about a teacher who can't understand.

hello, this is a psychic podcast and we continue to put together the puzzles of our lives, trying to find the formula for happiness that everyone dreams of, or at least try to do it. our today's heroine anastasia lived quite happily and a prosperous life. she was, well , a hired office worker, she had a stable salary, but an annual bonus is all that is due to those who work for hire,

stable, good, constantly, with moderate nerves, but in any case predictable, but this turned out to be the case for our heroine not enough, at some point she decided to change her quiet, calm office life to freelancing. many of us actually dream about this, it seems to us that my god, what freedom, how cool, how great everything is, all fate, everything our decisions are in our hands, but anastasia faced challenges that she generally didn’t think about, let’s try to figure out whether she was psychologically ready for a change in this format, whether each of us, well, according to our own structure, according to... psychotype ready for what is called freelancing. hello anastasia, good afternoon. and our expert today, psychologist, professor, doctor

of cultural studies, andrey. izberovsky will help you and me, why did you even decide to leave your homes, there were several of them, as i understand, everything was fine, stable, suddenly there’s such a sharp turn, yes, and i’ve worked for more than half my life in hiring, in very large companies, and these are world-class companies, on a federal scale, and my work was connected not only with some mass positions, let’s say, but i grew in my career. i became an expert, developed, and the growth was, of course, in income , in principle, i was happy with everything, and i changed industries, i changed companies, the growth was very cool, yeah, gradually, of course , i wanted an increase in income and just some kind of there will be more examination in the future, because i adapt quite well , i study very well, in particular, when covid started and we switched to a remote work format, i even

moved. for a year in dagestan, that is, i worked and lived in another region and everything worked out, everything was great, probably the apotheosis of my career was the transfer to a moscow company and the move to moscow, and i myself was born in a small town in the tver region, and it was something like this, wow, i’m in moscow, in a large company, in a great position, i was already working with managers, that is, this is such a significant growth. but i realized that there seemed to be less freedom, that is, i was moving to another region and i really liked this regime, the opportunity to move around, that is, not always sit in the office, in moscow there was this need to be at work, as if 24x7, yeah, and i’m not ready to pay that price for that position, the functionality that i received, but it ended up that at the end... in

september last year i went to freelance project work, but that’s exactly where i was at first euphoria, as you said, freedom, sleep until lunch, some kind of free movement around cities, and exhibitions and so on, but it turned out that it was as if they weren’t waiting for me there, that is, when you have a hired job, a structured regime, and structured tasks .

before going out on this freelancing, it was necessary to gather people, consult there with producers, coaches, i don’t know, psychologists, sketch out a plan, a budget, little by little, perhaps already switch from hiring to freelancing, well, that is, as if taking responsibility for yourself, and from those bosses who you they told you to be at work by nine, submit your report on time, yes, but how did you move on , tell me before andrey starts analyzing your situation, a little more details, this is how you woke up in the morning and i don’t go to work, when i worked in moscow, i went to work on one project, and this project was suddenly closed, that is, they literally told me that tomorrow we would finish work, and then i also joked that i did not go freelance, but the work itself left me, that is, you can say everything happened without me, here are your conditions

stay at this job? just this project, yes, that is, there is no project, which means your position does not exist, that is, after all, it was not your spontaneous decision, yes, you just thought about it, and then so, well, how often does this happen, yes , that fate gives a magic kick , and we fly, that’s another thing, in which direction we fly, how much time we have, the company was specially put together by several people who were thinking about freelancing and optimal starting conditions were created for them, most often, so to speak, there such a typical mistake freelancing. it is connected with the fact that a person either continues his expertise, that is , the expertise that he accumulated in his previous work or works, or the person completely changes his expertise, that’s what your idea of ​​​​your freelancing was, you are in a new expertise, then is in a new skin, which requires quite serious, of course, well, changes in your life, or you continue that recruitment, so not so long ago i worked, say, with a girl

who was in large companies. worked as a personnel officer and, in fact, there and how mor and continued on freelancing, in general, everything worked out for her, because the expertise is the same when a person is a career consultant for me, for example, right? yes, when expertise changes, this is exactly the same, this is a high-risk situation, so what was your plan for expertise, let’s start with this? well, honestly, come on, there was no plan, i’m now thinking, perhaps, my activity, it’s almost the same as what i did in companies, but i ’m thinking about how to formulate it, i probably took a step, not that to the side, but expanded, that is, i was engaged, for example

, to carry out, maybe test them there , well, that is, let’s fix it, that is , the first level of expertise is the same, i understand correctly, if a person is 80% the same, if a person retains most of that same expertise, then the second important, most important step is to dramatically increase your recognition, to dramatically become a brand, because if before that you worked, say, in a company, and the company attracted people to you with its name, now you are working for yourself, so when we come to me... let's say the same experts can consult there whether it is possible to go into freelancing and guys, first you need to invest in the name, who you are, that is , in order for you to leave, that is, when you separate, when you leave the wall of your company, from its brand, you should become a brand, well, no less, maybe even bigger

, so was there any preparatory work to expand your brand, there was no special work, the only thing i can probably note is that i began to be more active in social networks, and show my life, show yourself as a person show cases, some work with clients, well, everything that i can cover, for example, show what i do and tell what i can do that is useful to others, yes, but if the question is the volume of these actions, because in the market , unfortunately, you are not alone, for sure, yes, they too , these people also show something on social networks, so as a rule, we say, guys, until you have dispersed your brand while still sitting in your company, please don’t move on uh huh.

there was a large margin of financial strength to promote oneself in order to become a brand safety margin or not, it was not calculated, well, the transition turned out to be spontaneous, there was no plan, so i’m just flailing like a frog.

think it through, but here you haven’t thought it through, it seems to me that two important sides of this, this situation have touched us, i want you to help us figure out both, the first side is generally psychological readiness for drastic changes, because very often we become successful or get some kind of unknown prize, contrary to all rational laws, simply out of fear, yes here is the same frog that we have known since childhood, which beats with its legs, yes, i understand.

for which people usually pay, and you need to understand that freelancing is a way out of your comfort zone, and such a way out is tough, sometimes you have to work two or three times more, as if at a stage, i always say, people, that’s if you go into freelancing, you are about to be thirty years old or 35 or forty, no matter how old, that is, to the point where there is zero, and the beginning of a new life, if you are already tired of working, you have worked enough, you are definitely in for freelancing don't, because you'll have to work harder there. but if you feel that i want to work, i want, i want, i want, i want, then

of course you can, so what was it, what is it, what is your relationship with work, with your willingness to work, come on, what are your expectations, what were , except for exhibitions and sleep , nothing, i’m just beautiful, money, money, money, they somehow come to you, they just come to you, yes, in fact, you were right about the plan, there was no plan, and - i’m thinking now , it would be great to start with you, just like that... with this dialogue is moving to friends, before you are going to do anything in life, please come to the podcast as a psychic, okay? this is a psyche podcast, today , together with psychologist andrei sberovsky, we are analyzing the case of anastasia, who left a stable job for freelancing, didn’t get exactly what she wanted, what traits should a person have like this in nastya’s self-diagnosis mode? from other people who watch us, who will tell you, friends, you can go

freelance, because it most likely can you can’t become your success story at all, firstly, this is the most notorious hard work, that is, this willingness to work very hard, is it basic or not, let ’s start with a simple thing, it’s basic, it’s basic, yes, that is, no , that is, if you can, if you answer yourself honestly. so, i made conclusions, i realized that we need to work directly, i repeat, we lay down, we ask the second question, is there communication skills, and communication skills are obvious, yes, but communication skills are, so to speak, in working background mode, and there is such additional communication skills, which , well, with which money actually arises there, yes, because this is the ability to communicate there without stopping for 10-12 hours, there is just such a communication ability, yes, i would even you know, as i said, you asked a question.

you need to turn over like an hourglass to understand that: