for example, all scooters of kick-sharing services are limited in speed. plus, if you enter an area where there are a lot of pedestrians, where people are relaxing, in a park, in a square, then the scooter itself automatically slows down. we are now testing technology that will allow the scooter to independently determine that there are two or more passengers riding on it, and accordingly prevent such a violation. so far, only rental services insure, some exclusively for the client, others for third parties. for example, passers-by. so, if you a scooter driver has run over you, try to remember the color of his vehicle. time and place of the incident, then there is a chance to receive monetary compensation. by the way, pay attention that in many cities there are already so -called slow zones, where the permitted speed for scooters is even lower than stated in the road rules. territories and streets have appeared where the local authorities have completely banned riding sims. in return , they promise to build special paths so that owners and tenants of scooters, unicycles and bicycles do not interfere with pedestrians and motorists. dmitry orekhov, maryana soboleva. first channel.

may weather will arrive in the capital with the start of the new working week. forecasters promise about 20°. against this background , many are worried about what the coming summer will be like. thus, climatologists believe that it may become the hottest in the history of observations. there is reason to think so. global warming, and it in turn threatens humanity with many troubles. the doomsday glacier in antarctica from pauline is the size of britain. his tanya, scientists say, can raise the level of the world's oceans by more than half a meter, then large-scale flooding cannot be avoided, but is everything as clear as possible, how accurate can a forecast for the long term be? pyotr deryagin found out. the worst flood in tanzania, almost 30,000 hectares of corn fields. during a storm, lightning strikes

the statue of liberty, and a un meeting is briefly interrupted by an earthquake. i i can continue. summer is coming, climatologists are sounding the alarm. if 2023 was the hottest year on record, there is a risk that 2024 will continue to heat up the situation, writes bloomberg. the elneño effect heats up the equatorial pacific ocean, causing cataclysms around the world, and the polar ice caps continue to rapidly melt. the tueets glacier , the size of great britain, is depleting before our eyes and has even been nicknamed the doomsday glacier . and scientists are developing a project for a giant underwater curtain that would divert warm water from it. we are worried that it could get out of control, causing sea levels to rise by 65 cm. the

biggest danger is that if the glacier retreats, it could cause movement colossal oil of ice in antarctica, which it now holds back like a cork, the level of the world's oceans will begin to rise meter by meter, flooding the cities and countries of london, new york, the maldives, tokyo and st. petersburg risk being under water, but they may not be , or it will happen in hundreds of years, russian climatologists say, in the west they like to embellish the situation for show.

summer will be in 2 months, forecasts for 2 months have practically no, well, real practical meaning, so we we can’t say that next summer will really be terribly warm there, the antarctic glacier, like the greenland glacier, they are melting slowly, especially the greenland glacier, because of this the ocean level is rising, yes, but it’s happening, as i say ...

hydrocarbon footprint, everything possible is being done to reduce the use of fossil fuels in the global energy sector, to replace them with renewable energy sources, what we are observing is that it is beneficial for the purchasers of all this policy, the beneficiaries are the owners those same green technologies and financiers who provide so-called green loans in quotes so that countries can replace... conventional electricity generation with green ones. the same electric cars turned out to be much dirtier during production than gasoline cars, how much ore is mined for batteries and how many harmful substances are released at enterprises. the environmental damage is one and a half times higher, and for some industries, the energy

of solar panels, for example, is simply not suitable, however, it is being actively introduced, although after the refusal of russian energy resources. the german economy, for example, is in recession, and this example seems to have cooled the... new trend water recommendations on quotas, duties and control of global water resources are already being developed, and what we are hearing from think tanks in western countries turns out that those industries , which feed a significant number of the population of developing countries, well , first of all, agriculture, provide income, including export, this is mineral extraction, the mining sector, textile production and energy production. it turns out that this is a negative factor for the water balance, accordingly, it is supposed to develop tools for controlling the use of water, it is proposed to come up with some kind of duties - to charge for the so-called water-intensive

technologies for the fact that goods will be marked with how much water was spent on them production, and thus the goal is to control up to 30%. use of press water, all this against the backdrop of realistically possible droughts in different regions of our planet due to global warming, and meanwhile, if you don’t pour trillions of dollars into the financial bubbles of stock exchanges, it would be possible to launch a program to cool the atmosphere right now, for example, using geoengineering there are projects, including in russia, to spray special aerosols into the atmosphere, which would reduce the heat entering the earth, and thus cool the earth, to new climate conditions for humanity. one way or another we will have to adapt, as it was before: periods of heat and cold alternated over millions of years, it is quite possible that suddenly global warming will simply stop due to natural causes, then it will be necessary to think about how to keep warm. pyotr deryagin, irina bliznyuk, mikhail fedorov,

dmitry bilov, anastasia berestenko, channel one. that’s all for now, we are monitoring the developments, well, now on the first, watch the “big history” program. the russian national samba team returns in triumph from yerevan from the world cup, in which more than 100 athletes from 14 countries took part. our sambo wrestlers won 12 gold awards out of fourteen possible, while five finals at once turned out to be purely russian. let's note the successes of world champions stanislav scriabin and david ogonisyan. debut victories at the international level were won by harun tlishev, vladimir mnatsakyan, ivan agafonov, oksana kobeleva, elizaveta khatchikova and. daria kazantseva. now russian sambo wrestlers will prepare for the european championships, which will be held from may 9 to 12 in serbia. today in yekaterinburg the third match of the semi-final series of the gagarin cup will take place between the motorist and metallurgist. the duel between these teams is still 1:1. in the previous meeting, which

ended with a score of 4:2, nikolai zavarokhin’s team found the key to success during the majority play. she took advantage of her numerical superiority three times. stefan dacosta, who opened the scoring, crossed the 50-point mark. during his career in the khl, the frenchman has a double goal. and the most productive hockey player of the match was the leader of the motorist, anatoly goloshev, who scored four points using the goal plus pass system. this happened to him for only the second time in his career in the new experience round. the debut was january 1, 2018 in an away game with boris. zenit basketball players defeated unix in the central match of the vtb united league game week. in the first half, the st. petersburg team had the initiative, and shortly before the big break, airtel helped the hosts organize. a significant advantage of 45-35, but nenat dimitrievich did not lag behind in the duel of playmakers, his productive period allowed the kazan team to finish the second quarter with a gap of only minus two. in the debut of the third ten-minute period , mikhail, who was on loan from unix from nizhny novgorod, showed himself brightly belenitsky, his four points in a row and

dimitrievic's long-range hit forced javier puscual to take a timeout with the score 57:51 in favor of the guests. the pause helped zenit; two hits from behind the arc from kyle kuric returned his team to the status of leaders. the beginning of the decisive period 66-65 by the middle of the final quarter the distance between the teams remained minimal, then rtel turned on again. in a short time he scored in the pass, then with a long throw and intercepted the ball from... 2 minutes before the end the difference was already noticeable 87:78 in favor of the st. petersburgers last attempt eric green attempted to turn the tide of the game, but the most that kazan managed to do was get within four points. result 91:87. pascual celebrated his 100th success in the vtb united league, and his zenit came within one victory of the leaders of the second stage of the regular championship, cska iniks. former cska basketball player will clyburn was recognized as the most valuable player of the thirty-third. euroleague tour. the american forward helped his current club andal efes win the istanbul fenerbahce derby. 82:80.

clyburn had 21 points, five rebounds and four gears. this is his sixth personal award in the main club tournament of the old world and the first this season. in the last round on april 11, it will be decided whether anadalu fs will get into the play round. the turkish team, currently occupying the coveted tenth place, will host cervena star on its site. as for the winner of the regular season. then he has been known for a long time. real madrid secured first place ahead of schedule and clearly slowed down, losing to the house of bosconia. 91:95. real madrid playmaker sergio rodriguez became the third player to reach 400 matches in the euroleague. his teammate sergio lul has just one more. the record holder is ex-csk basketball player kyle hines, currently playing for milan. he has 424 matches under his belt. former footballer denito malcom took alhilal one step further.

1:00 let's add that in the remaining seven matches alhilal needs to score only nine points and

he will become unattainable for al-nasr. by the way, tomorrow in abu dhabi these teams will meet in the semi-finals of the saudi arabian super cup. dmitry terekhov, sports news, channel one. good evening, there is a big story on air, a program for those who want to know the past in order to understand the present and see the future. 75 years ago, on april 4, 1949, it was created. organization, the only purpose, the only goal, which is the destruction

of our country. north atlantic treaty organization, north atlantic treaty organization, nato. the main instrument of global dominance of the united states and the west, the most powerful military bloc, which accounts for up to 80% of military spending on the planet. all these decades of nato expanded to include more and more countries. gon is an instrument of war against russia. a war has been declared on us, and not just

a hybrid one. nato weapons, nato soldiers are killing our soldiers and civilians, destroying russian cities. the goal is stated: the strategic defeat of russia, the destruction of us as a state, each of us. for this they are preparing and threatening to throw their troops at us. will they quit? will we fight with nato, who will win if we do? where did it all start and what is nato today? dmitry olegovich ragozin, senator of the russian federation from the zaporozhye region, during. he was our ambassador to nato for almost 4 years, now he is in berdyansk. dmitry olegovich, what is nato today and what is nato from the inside, as you saw it? any successful international organization is, first of all, a fairly united, successful team of staff. in nato, of course, the most important thing is the apparatus,

which has become, as they say, 700 people, now it may be even more, it is very motivated. people focused on a specific goal, you have already outlined it, this is in general expansion of the zone of military influence of the west, suppression of all those who resist, and of course, as a king, they always had russia, this is the formula that is in everyone’s head, so the general secretaries can change there, i found several of them, i remember when i was still a boy, i was 20 something years old there, i worked on the committee of youth organizations, we had a delegation, we went to brussels, i met with manched and europe, we talked in an informal setting, we talked in a formal setting, but when they gather together, it's collective a structure sharpened against us. as for

current events, we can say that well... we, at least at the front, understand that nato is already participating in this war, participating precisely not as a coalition of the willing, as they participated, for example, in the events of the same war. syria or, say, in liwa, and here it is fully, that is, it is extremely important for them that everyone signs in blood that they are all participating in the fight against russia, what they have done to ukraine over the past few years is a monstrous situation , they in fact, they got involved in the civil war as an external force.

training personnel, in particular, i myself interrogated last summer, when the so-called counter-offensive was just here on the zaporozhye front in the rabotin, verbovoe area, i had the opportunity to interrogate captured ukrainian officers, all of them were trained either in holland or in britain or germany, a huge amount of photos and videos on their phones, a large number of instructors, listen. yes, i myself came under fire in december twenty-second years ago, for me then, my hotel comrades were hit by an american howitzer, three sevens with an american with an american, as it has now been established, which means this crew and the combat crew of the americans, i think that they are frantically getting into this war, but in my opinion they

no longer feel the shores of their special forces for a long time here are the photographs that we... belgorod is constantly under fire, attacks on the rostov region and this is not only against military targets, it is against civilian targets, this is already an undeclared war, you just need to understand this, really an undeclared war is going on, but now the nato countries are raising the question of becoming officially a party to the conflict. the question arises

of whether it is possible to invoke the fifth article of the treaty establishing nato, the washington treaty, which was... just signed on april 4, 1949. i will remind you of the contents of this fifth article. let's listen. the contracting parties agree that an armed attack on one or more of them in europe or north america will be considered an attack on them as a whole. and therefore they agree provided that in the event of such an armed attack, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defense recognized in article 50.1 of the charter of the united nations, will provide assistance to the contracting country attacked or contracting parties subjected to such attack attack, by immediately taking such individual or joint action as is deemed necessary, including the use of armed force for the purpose of restoration and subsequent preservation of security in the north atlantic region. any such armed attack and all

measures taken as a result shall be immediately reported to the security council. such measures will cease when the security council takes the measures necessary to restore international peace and security. do you think they'll get to the point where they want to apply it in a relational way. collective backing vocals, but in reality they can get into this mess, deadly for everyone the most desperate russophobes can get into the mess, well, the same french, the british,

of course, the poles, i think that most likely it will be a group of provocateurs that will try to drag out the entire nato, naturally, we cannot carry out target selection, you know, just physically this is impossible, if they fire at us, we also fire at us, which means... the problem is that the west is escalating the conflict, and this escalation does not have any brakes, it’s just a train flying down, and

if suddenly in some at a certain point we according to our nuclear doctrine, we understand that the balance of power on the battlefield is such that our ground forces, our economic capabilities, our human capabilities are incomparable with the collective capabilities... of all this collective west, then we will simply be forced to resort to the great equalizer , but this is obviously completely spelled out in our doctrine, this is what, strictly speaking, provocateurs from the west, from nato, are rushing, they just, you know, they haven’t fought for a long time, this whole europe, yes, it fought, paris surrendered without a fight, they don’t understand what colossal destruction is, they don’t understand what it’s like to receive coffins, not just a couple. coffins from mercenaries, when the coffins arrive en masse, they haven’t felt it yet, they have this excitement, this adrenaline overwhelms them and pushes them into this carnage, but what can happen, it will be

a disaster, because the fifth article will work, or there will be no one to even accept it, this fifth article will be considered at the nato council, because simply the situation can very develop quickly, yes, thank you very much, dmitry olegovich, dmitry rogozin, senator. zaporozhye, the nato concept, it was adopted last in 2022, and it defines, in fact, the main rivals, russia and china, but russia is in first place, and in such formulations that, in general, in my opinion, do not leave no room for compromise or dialogue, let's honor the nato concept. authoritarian regimes challenge our interests, values ​​and democratic way of life. russian federation poses the most significant and immediate threat to the security

of allies and to the peace and stability of the euro-atlantic region. it seeks to establish areas of direct control through coercion, subversion, aggression and annexation. it uses conventional cybernetic and hybrid means against us and our partners. her aggressive military stance, rhetoric and proven willingness to apply. undermine the rules-based international order to achieve their political goals. the russian federation is modernizing its nuclear forces, expanding its new destructive dual-use systems, they are aimed at destabilizing countries to the east and south of us, the ability to prevent the transfer of reinforcements to our allies in the far north and the violation of freedom of navigation across the north atlantic is a strategic challenge for the alliance , moscow’s buildup of military power, including in the baltic regions. the black and mediterranean seas, along with its military integration with belarus, challenge our security and interests. in general, one gets the impression that we are approaching their borders, and not

ours. to keep the russians on the sidelines, the americans inside, and the germans under, then, in general, the british were in charge of this whole thing, but gradually, gradually, the entire leadership in nato went, naturally to the united states, they never particularly liked this anti-soviet, anti-russian position they hid it, which is typical, remember when they created this so-called bloc, because the soviet

union proposed... clearly called it - we are creating this alliance undermining the un, because at the yalter meeting at the post-dan meeting, the leaders of the winning countries agreed that everything would be decided by the un and the security council, naturally this newly created bloc, it absolutely worked as a counterweight, and the ability to apply

double standards are, in general, theirs... on april 4, a bloc was created; already in december of the same forty-ninth year, the dropo plan appeared, a well-known plan, which means striking targets of the soviet union, and here that characteristically, it’s not even that they planned to use 300 atomic bombs, about 250,000 conventional... bombs they were going to drop, something else is interesting there, for the first time in this regard the term dissidents appears, and the bet, in general, was made precisely to undermine the soviet union from within, it must be said that the dropshot plan was not the first plan for a nuclear attack on our country, and the first plans began to be developed back in september 1945, but more on that after the advertisement. this is my friend alyosha, just recently

his arm was completely paralyzed and he could not worked, and now, and now i can move in different ways, and the kids at school like it, like this, it’s clear, now in all directions, a unique development of russian scientists, exoskeletons, and not only in the program, live healthy, tomorrow on the first . manmencher whiskey is a product of the stellar group, gin сnop, a product of the stellar group, monte chococa cognac, a product of the stellar group, rom castro, a product of the stellar group, veta vodka, a product of the stellar group.

called five times, now explain to me why you call him several times a day, including at night, the taxi is under cover, premiere, tomorrow after the program time, cool, cool, i feel out of place as the chairman of the jury, perhaps all the most famous

actors and directors were sitting at this table. i'd like to have lunch please, but this is pasadena, we don't have restaurants. how did you feel in a film where all the actors played themselves and only you had a role? tell me you like my hat? you don't have a hat, do you? i would like to say in the future that i did everything i could in my life. chanson, it’s not just for you to do it

necessary. it was so festive and i wanted to go out and dance, but i couldn’t.

there is a big story on the air, after the end of the great patriotic war, the leadership of the soviet union had hopes of continuing allied relations with the usa and great britain. hope, i didn’t want it for long. the victorious soviet union stood in the way of anglo-saxon global hegemony plans. already in may 1945, by order.

on april 4, 1949, i stood next to secretary of state dean atchison as he signed the treaty on behalf of the united states, which became the first peacetime military alliance entered into with the united states since the adoption of the constitution, earlier in our history, before the constitution was written, the colonies... a historic meeting held in the assembly hall of the department of labor in washington, dc. well, why, why was this necessary from the same memoirs.

the meeting noted that although there was no evidence that the soviets had a plan for armed aggression, there was a constant danger of causing incidents. international tensions, it was part of the soviet strategy to apply pressure wherever an advantage could be gained. then the continuation of a minor incident could easily lead to war and the soviet conquest of the european continent. this was the key moment. the marshall plan brought some relief, but the constant threat of unpredictable action from the soviets created an atmosphere of uncertainty and fear among the peoples of western europe. something had to be done in order to neutralize the fear of the peoples of europe that their countries would be captured by the soviet army before effective help arrived, only a comprehensive security system could dispel such fears, yes, well, about fear, if we speak about it, it was deliberately whipped up then in the western world in the united states states of america,

this fear against the soviet union, remember mccarthyism, is very reminiscent of today’s situation in front of the now russian threat, and if we talk about plans, indeed, in september it was just the ashes over kheroshima nagasaki did not settle, they began... to develop a plan to strike twenty, so far twenty soviet cities, the largest cities with the destruction of the population, namely with nuclear weapons. so, at the beginning we have totalite 20-30. then we have pinchers, which is about 50 nuclear warheads that were supposed to be used. august 1947: 34 atomic bombs in 24 cities of the soviet union. december 1948 sisal 133 atomic bombs on 70 cities of the soviet union. november '49 of tackle 220 on 123 targets. dropshot mentioned.

american and polish emigrant forces, and german forces were to be used in the war against the soviet union, then this number only increased, that is, the goal that was set in cannon’s long telegram, then in the speech of churchel, fulton, and then in the truman doctrine in terms of the marshal, in the end, the unification of western europe under the economic dictate of the united states of america, and then the bussels forty -eighth year.

purposes of this agreement, and regarding that the north atlantic treaty

is in conflict with the principles and purposes of the united nations, of the great powers, only the soviet union is excluded from among the parties to this treaty, which can only be explained by the fact that this treaty is directed against the soviet union, implemented by the united states in cooperation with great britain and france in the current peaceful environment of extensive military activities, including an increase in all branches of the armed forces, the development of a plan for the use of atomic weapons, stockpiles atomic bombs, which are purely offensive weapons, the construction of a network of air and naval bases, and so on, are by no means defensive in nature. the north atlantic treaty is intended to intimidate states that do not agree to submit to the dictates of the anglo-american group of powers that claim world domination. after all, in principle , nothing has changed except geography, that is, then it was a small group of countries, now it is already 32 states, and indeed the sequence is of malicious purposes western countries in relation to the soviet union,

and then russia, have, well, this sequence is clear to trace, in the quote from truman that you cited from the memoirs, there is an appeal to the mood of the people, the mood of the people then after the war was exactly the opposite in europe, and not only in europe, in the middle east in asia there were not only moods. peace, because the war was very difficult, but there was also admiration for the soviet union, which was demonized so much, scolded so much, lied to so much in his address, it was the soviet union that was not disputed by anyone at that time; it made a decisive contribution to the victory in the second world war; peoples , especially in europe, showed great sympathy for the soviet union, for the soviet union, precisely in order to silence their own peoples too. so that they do not bring to power

forces friendly to the soviet union within their countries, this is all the escalation, the demonization of the soviet union, macarthyism, the persecution of forces friendly to the soviet union, the intelligentsia, workers, this all happened, and there are parallels with the present time, when they keep a group of supposedly such an elite, which is in counter in their own...

officially this will be done a little later, but i think the first serious response to nato expansion was what happened on august 30, 1949, the report of beria and kurchatov stalin. on august 29, 1949 at 4:00 am moscow time and at 7 am local time in a remote steppe region of the kazakh ussr, 170 km west of the city. in semipalatinsk, at a specially built and equipped experimental site , the first explosion of an atomic bomb was obtained in the ussr exceptional in its destructive destructive power. moreover, it is very interesting, because we have never officially confirmed that we have nuclear weapons, there was a statement from tas on september 27

, 1949, with very interesting content, let’s listen. on september 23, us president truman announced that, according to the us government, in one of the last... weeks , an atomic explosion occurred in the ussr. in this regard, tas is authorized to state the following: in the soviet union, as is known, construction work is carried out on a large scale: construction hydroelectric power stations, mines, canals, roads, which necessitate large-scale blasting operations using the latest technical means. since these blasting operations occurred and occur quite often in different parts of the country, it is possible that this could attract attention outside the soviet union. as for the production of atomic energy, tas considers it necessary to recall that on november 6, 1947 , ussr foreign minister vyacheslav mikhailovich molotov made a statement regarding the secret atomic bomb, saying that this secret no longer exists. this statement meant that the soviet union had already discovered the secret of atomic weapons, and it had these weapons at its disposal. the scientific community

of the united states of america accepted this statement of molotov as puke, believing that the russians could master atomic weapons no earlier than 1952, but they were mistaken. since the soviet union mastered the secret of atomic weapons back in 1947, well, in fact, it was an element of our bluff, but we didn’t, we still aged our nuclear program, meaning to show that we already have a lot of nuclear bombs, when in fact there were very few of them, but naturally, because as soon as the united states realized that they had lost hegemony in the possession of nuclear weapons, their uh changed radically accordingly. politics position in relation to the soviet union, all these plans, there really are a lot of them, the number of bombs has increased, moreover, studies immediately appear on acceptable damage there, then it all transforms into unacceptable damage, but such calculations were carried out

as much as the united states can lose percent of the industrial potential there is up to 25%, how many can they...

they have existed for a long time, now they are already turning into some kind of forces of unimaginable sizes, up to 300,000 people, but nevertheless, returning to history, i must say that. ..

states have always been left out of brackets, it has always been 70% of nato’s military potential, but european countries in terms of military, well , especially, of course, not in the forties, not in the fifties, but in the sixties, seventies, early eighties, it was really a military force, the same bundeswehr 450,000 people, the same armed forces of great britain. france has always had a special position regarding nato, but even without france, the armed forces of western

europe were a decent force, but i repeat once again, in general -purpose forces, they were vastly inferior to us, hence this concept of the use of non-strategic nuclear weapons , which was first born in the united states, and not here, they are now reproaching us for the fact that we mainly pushed for nuclear weapons here. but we press on because it really exists imbalances in general purpose forces. well, it must be said that atomic weapons were not our country’s only response to the creation of nato. for example, i believe that such responses were our asymmetrical actions in asia and the decision to force the chinese revolution, providing it with decisive assistance, which it won in the fall of 1949, and the decision to drag the americans into the war in korea. this too. was done quite consciously, that is, plus a sharp increase in our military spending, building up nuclear

potential, that is, the answer was from the very beginning was so complex and multifaceted, of course, the soviet leadership clearly understood that nothing good could be expected from nato, i remember my years as a lieutenant, after graduating from school this... year i came to the second guards tank army in the city of schwerin in germany , the official commander of the reconnaissance platoon and the chief of reconnaissance of the regiment took me to the place of my observation post on the combat mission, the very border, this is the north-west of the gdr at that time, i still remember this concrete ditch, so concreted, rows of prickly wire, and there, somewhere about a kilometer away, that means our potential enemy was located. by the way, in these eighties we had absolutely no doubt that we would complete the combat mission that

stood before the companies, battalions, regiments, divisions, in fact, the entire group of soviet troops in germany, and we were able to reach lomanche, including perhaps not in 24 or 48 hours, but a little longer, but this did not change the situation. and the point is not only that - we surpassed them in composition - and the number of troops of general importance, the point is the fact that we were superior to them in organizing the combat training of these same troops, in the ability to use them, because there were still a lot of front-line soldiers who remembered, understood and knew how to fight, and not pretend that we were fighting, of course. .. and the warsaw pact, which appeared a little later, which also became such a very worthy answer, i

took part in many exercises of the then warsaw pact, i remember the poles well, and the guys, comrade of the gdr, i remember very well, it’s their founding day was, people's army. they were ready to understand that if necessary, they would complete these tasks. this, by the way, is a continuation of the mood of the people. in fact,

this is the berlin wall, which they keep telling us is there. and what happened then, of course, it was, well, you know, such a very terrible shock, the understanding that this was the calm future that was visible, it was over , uncertainty began, uncertainty began, but then a new challenge followed from

our countries, creating your own military-political bloc, warsaw pact. a bipolar confrontation has begun, about this after the advertisement, the snow is still white in the fields, and in the spring the waters are noisy, they are running, waking up the sleepy shore, they are running, shining and shouting, they are shouting to all ends, spring is coming, spring is coming, we are the young spring's messengers, she is us sent ahead what, where, when, spring series of games, look after the program for the time. kiev propagandists distorted bulgakov's biography so much that they instantly turned him into

an enemy of ukraine. since kiev is the mother of russian cities, these are these. crazy people, they are from they will refuse kiev, the sharikovs gave birth to offspring, now they are taking revenge on bulgakov, now he has been declared a ukrainophobe and they did the right thing, of course, because they finally started reading books, as well as an exclusive, in our studio the fighters who captured the german marder, outdated equipment, are sending written off here, given to ukranazis and a tale about how ukrainian civilization appeared in the second millennium bc, anti-fake, premiere, tomorrow on the first. as the chairman of the jury i feel out of place, behind this perhaps all the most famous actors and directors in the world were sitting at the table. i'd like to have lunch please, but this is pasadena, we don't have restaurants. how did you feel in a film where all the actors played themselves and only you had a role? is golbert a policeman? does the local

public accept our paintings? they are waiting for some other turn. we are again together with those who love good music with all their souls. volodya, well, you hooked me so much that i swam, singing swing in russian is another task, you know, it’s not the gears always match. you were still

a boss, there is no rumor. three chords, new season from april 14 on the first. there's a big story on the air. for 35 years, from the mid-fifties to the end of the nineties, the main content of international relations was the tough bipolar confrontation between

the north atlantic alliance, led by the united states, and the organization. treaty of shaw, led by the soviet union. the watershed between the two states passed through germany, divided into the federal republic of germany and the german democratic republic, between nato countries and the warsaw organization agreement. soviet american allies and partners in asia, africa and even latin america. at some point it seemed that the soviet bloc was stronger. i remember my grandfather, vyacheslav mikhailovich molotov, told me that at the time of stalin’s death we controlled 70% of humanity, then nikita came and ruined everything. and we, despite everything, were ready for dialogue with nato. moreover, the ussr. was ready to join nato before creating the warsaw pact organization, this is exactly the proposal put forward by foreign minister molotov in 1954, here is his

note, khrushchev and molenkov. most likely, the organizers of the north atlantic bloc will react negatively to this step of the soviet government and put forward many different objections. in this case, the governments of the three powers will again show themselves as organizers of a military bloc against others. and this will strengthen the position of the socialist forces fighting against the formation of a european defense community. of course, if the statement of the soviet government is met with positive relations from the three western powers, this will mean great the success of the soviet union, since the ussr joining the north atlantic pact under certain conditions, would radically change the nature of this pact. the ussr's entry into the north atlantic pact, simultaneously with the conclusion of a pan-european agreement on a system of collective security in europe, disrupts plans to create a european defense community and rearm western germany. after 5 days, having received the consent of the then president of the central committee, molotov invited the ambassadors of the three great powers and

made a statement. march 31, 1954 molotov invited bolin, the hater and the french ambassador to read a note to them with a draft collective security treaty, further noting that the north atlantic treaty cannot ... be considered aggressive by the soviet government, molotov added, it is quite obvious that the organization of the north atlantic treaty could, under appropriate conditions, lose its aggressive nature, if all the great powers that were part of the anti-hitler coalition became its participants. accordingly , guided by the unchanging principles its peace-loving policy, the soviet government expresses its readiness to consider jointly with interested governments the question of the participation of the ussr in the north atlantic treaty. the answer was silence, a silence that continued further, although this question in 1955 was raised directly at

the geneva conference at the summit of the four great powers, gromyk’s memoirs. gromyka recalled that noticeable excitement was caused by bulganin’s reminder of the ussr’s initiative to join nato. within a few minutes none of the western delegations uttered a word in response to... the question posed, esenhower’s neck stretched out and became even longer, he leaned towards dulles to privately discuss what was happening with him, the smile characteristic of him disappeared from the president’s face, as if there was none, but neither then nor later did we receive any formal response to our proposal in geneva, mikhail grivich, but there was such an interesting diplomatic very interesting diplomatic, you know, it reminds us of today’s question from our diplomats, our minister of foreign affairs to western, let's say, and... colleagues in quotation marks about the security of russia today, either ignoring or silence, exactly the same situation was then, but the fact is that then it was the western countries in the head of the united states who were already

purposefully led not only to confrontation and, of course, ultimately to the destruction of the soviet union, but what especially frightened us was that they were actively dragging germany into the western union into the western bloc, because there really was a watershed in europe. by and large, both through berlin and through germany, and look, the second world war had not yet ended, and already at the american headquarters there was a special historical committee, a military historical commission, and a department that attracted the german section, german generals, so that they taught the americans how to fight the soviet union, moreover, and write the history of the second world war, 70 volumes at the beginning, that is, they wrote 1500 texts, but... the important thing is that then we see, after germany joins, western germany joins nato, 136 generals of the wehrmacht and the sss were not only in the bundesphere, they were in nato structures. let us remember

adolf heusinger, who headed the nato military committee, this is a wehrmacht general who fought against us, what could the soviet union think when it’s not just the anglo-saxons who are coming at it, but the germans, with whom we...

are part of it allocated a certain number of troops, which are subordinate to the main command of the warsaw pact. a headquarters was created under the commander-in-chief, when we discussed who to appoint, everyone was in favor of it becoming the military commander from soviet union. it was agreed that the defense ministers of the countries belonging to the warsaw organization are deputy commanders-in-chief. by creating this pact, we wanted to put pressure on the west to show that it is impossible to talk with socialist countries in the language of force. such times are long gone. if you created. nato military bloc, then in response we are creating the warsaw pact organization, but we did not stop our struggle for detente and peaceful coexistence, emphasizing that we created the warsaw pact organization in defensive purposes only in response to the creation of nato, they proposed many times in conversations with western statesmen and in official documents to liquidate our warsaw pact if the west liquidates nato. in fact, the creation of nato was not even in response, but in response to germany's admission to nato. germany

was recognized by everyone, that although it was defeated, it is still a military force with its own history, traditions, even heusinger, general hosenger, is the head of the operational department of the wehrmacht, this is a key figure who, so to speak, was engaged in development, which was engaged in the development of almost all operations, especially in the final stage of the war, even if they were, so to speak, lost, but nevertheless. german military thought, it still existed and no one disputed it, as for the confrontation between the warsaw pact and nato, i repeat once again that yes, two united military forces began to confront each other in europe, the americans, i repeat again, dominated in nato, their... uh presence in europe at its peak

reached about 200,000 people, plus refordger-type exercises were regularly held, once every 2 years, when a massive transfer of settlement forces to europe was carried out, involving not only military transport aviation, but also civil aviation, civilian ships, that is, these were very large-scale exercises, which they stopped only in ninety first year after the collapse of the soviet union, but the warsaw pact... such, i would say, the dominant soviet tanks were feared, right up to the conclusion of the treaty on conventional armed forces in europe, where we actually 12.00 tanks were cut. this confrontation continued until the collapse of the soviet union. the confrontation was quite tough.

the answer was six, eight at the most, then we really hinted that we could use nuclear weapons in defense of egypt. then, of course, the cuban missile crisis, when our medium-range weapons with nuclear warheads were delivered to cuba, and president kennedy brought his nuclear forces to full combat readiness, and so it was.

that during the cuban missile crisis everyone realized risks of nuclear war, so they say they decided that these risks need to be reduced, but i want to remind you that after all. it seems that everyone realized the risks, but from the moment of the caribbean crisis, say, until the conclusion of the start-1 treaty, strategic weapons during this period increased significantly, the number of missiles, the introduction of multiple warheads, individually targeted multiple warheads in

the seventies, eighties, significantly increased strategic arsenals, in the majority, you can probably have three rounds of this nuclear competition... the initiator of a new round of the arms race was the united states, and in fact we had a situation where the united states was constantly looking for an opportunity to win a nuclear war, and the soviet union was constantly again leading all this into a nuclear impasse, creating a counterbalance, a nuclear balance, and depriving the united states. hopes to win a nuclear, nuclear war, so the risk existed, but this risk was leveled, then there was no other possibility only by increasing the quantitative and qualitative strategic nuclear

weapons, but nevertheless, despite all the efforts to control arms, détente in the seventies, we came... to the period of gorbachev's presidency, in a state when, in general, it was believed that the threat of nuclear war was as great as never, and nato was seen as the most serious adversary. gorbachev spoke about this, not yet being president, in his report to the twenty -seventh congress of the cpsu, that’s what he said then. perhaps never in the post-war decades has the situation in the world been so bad. explosive, and therefore complex and unfavorable, as in the first half of the eighties: the right-wing group that came to power in the united states, their main fellow travelers in nato, turned sharply from détente to military-power politics, they adopted doctrines that reject good neighborly cooperation as principles of world development, but as a political

philosophy of international relations. it must be said that nato has never changed its strategic concept, never changed its treaty, but our view of nato, for some reason it suddenly changed. 3-4 years after this speech by gorbachev, the same gorbachev said that it turns out that this is our best friend, more about this after the advertisement, this is my friend alyosha, just recently his arm was completely paralyzed and did not work, and now, and now i can move it in different ways, and the kids at school love it. like this, of course, now in all directions, a unique development of russian scientists, exoskeletons, and not only in the program it’s healthy to live, tomorrow on the first day, old barrel cognac, stellar product

group, stirsman bourbon, product of stellor group. mancacher listings are a product of the stellar group. cnop gin is a product of stellar group. cognac monte shock. product of stellar group. a month and a half ago, the parents of lieutenant alexei turbin were killed. from this moment on, we have many questions that still have no answer. we'll have to keep an eye on him. in management. no one should know that we are dating, handsome, our build has ripened everywhere, it’s better to explain how you manage to appear everywhere first, that the mentee is inflamed, investigators are coming to me today they came and asked all sorts of nonsense, why don’t you pick up the phone, i called you five times,

now explain to me why you call him several times a day, including at night, undercover taxi, premiere, tomorrow after the program. figulbert is a policeman, but how do the local public perceive our paintings? they are expecting some other turn of russian cinema. are we from the clinic? what? are you criticizing the american dream? no, i'm trying to tell the story of banks and laura

palmer's last seven days. matador on friday on the first. tell, what do you like about my hat? you don't have a hat. i would like to say in the future that i did everything i could in my life.

the soviet union withdrew troops from germany and eastern europe, they were often withdrawn into open fields. the ussr dissolved the warsaw pact and the council for mutual economic assistance, breaking up into 15 states, each of which was inherited. russia disarmed, lost half of its economy , western consultants and inspectors were installed in every ministry and every military enterprise. spies, it began to expand rapidly, a promise

gorbachev, well, they misunderstood us, there were no written obligations, they began to openly, furiously wipe their feet on russia, they simply imprisoned their nazi puppets in ukraine as a result of a coup. we warned how this would end, they didn’t believe us, well, it’s a promise. do not expand nato. well, actually, the united states itself published transcripts of baker’s negotiations with mikhail sergeevich gorbachev and we can read his statement there. let's listen. we understand that countries in the east need guarantees. if we save presence in germany, which is part of nato, nato jurisdiction will not be extended to an inch of the east. in the end, if it is acceptable to everyone, we could have a discussion in a 2+4 format, which. could have led to such a result, when nato began to expand,

yevgeny primakov became the minister of foreign affairs of our country, and the first thing he did was to ask for the actual protocols of all negotiations, let’s read his memoirs, he asked to give me these archival materials, they belonged to the period the unification of germany, and then the collapse of the warsaw pact, the leaders of all the leading western nato member states then assured the soviet leaders that they had no idea of ​​expansion on their minds.

let's listen, from what i have heard , some people still doubt our intentions, i would like to state very clearly that we need stability or some kind of stabilizing element for the world. we are not going to interfere in the internal affairs of russia, as well as in the internal affairs of other sovereign countries. states, members of the cis. we would like to establish the most friendly relations with all former soviet republics. mikhailovich, they lie like

they breathe? yes, gorbachev was simply dismissed as inexperienced. enough of a person in foreign policy, if in 1986 he spoke through the mouth of our foreign ministry, even then gromyk’s foreign ministry, our military-industrial complex, everything that was developed then, then meeting with reagan, then with bush, negotiating, but obviously he was fascinated, let's say, by the western way of life and decided well, everything in the world has changed now, for some reason he thought that the west and we have the same things. values, that’s what’s amazing, how this can be, but gorbachev, it would seem, put on rose-colored glasses, appointed shvardnadze as minister of foreign affairs, i think, and here there are certain impulses that said that it is necessary to concede to the west as much as possible, to concede the eastern european countries , to give up berlin, to give up germany, the gdr, and so on,

but that diplomacy and policy that was acceptable to us. after the collapse of the soviet union, already under yeltsin and kozyrev’s policy, but this is mr. yes, who said that yes, you better tell us what kind of foreign policy we should have, he addressed directly to the american representatives, what it is, that is, we were not just in limited sovereignty, in fact we were losing by leaps and bounds then we ceded sovereignty to the west this territory, what they could promise us, they of course had to , out of... out of their interests, promise us anything, the main thing is to achieve their goals, the main thing to get nato expansion at the expense of those territories that belonged to the warsaw pact, and then to go directly to our territory, to the former republics of the soviet union, this is the goal, i probably think, they set even then, no matter what they say today, it was a purposeful goal that they achieved.

after the collapse of the soviet union, the united states became the sole superpower. noticed all over the world, except for the ministry of foreign affairs of the russian federation, where andrei kozyrev was sitting, that’s what he was then said. the hegemony of the united states, which scares us, and talk about the only superpower, all these are narrow-minded stereotypes, there is no single superpower, so the goal was, in fact, integration into the western club, joining nato, if accepted, the european union, if accepted. it is still possible to at least somehow understand the reduction of general-purpose forces, we experienced something similar

, in general, under the same khrushchev, but when nuclear weapons carriers were destroyed completely... justifiably and incomprehensibly for what purpose, when they cut our nuclear -powered submarine cruisers under the supervision of american specialists, in quotes, but this still defies any logical explanation; in principle, with such kozuri in our hands, we could bargain with them for anything we wanted. then, but we did not do this, it was our unilateral disarmament that led to the fact that the united states became the only superpower, in general, the americans, and the europeans, they are not stupid people, they study history, they analyze the situation, they we saw clearly

well, europe, united europe , failed to win twice. it didn’t work out for russia led by napoleon, it didn’t work out for hitler, who basically did almost the same thing, the americans then thought it was good that europe couldn’t cope alone, which means it was in order to win.

iskander’s predecessor, but he did not fall under any restrictions, but secretary of state baker said: “if you want a treaty, destroy this complex, why? too mobile, so to speak, in a nuclear version, generally too good to exist, they destroyed, moreover, i later talked once with the chief designer of his kingdom of heaven, they destroyed all the design documentation, even the copy that is stored forever on

armored vehicles, and before the treaty came into force, we did a completely normal thing, that the americans did, they took their tanks to nivada and put them in

storage, we took them beyond the urals, although even then it was clear that they would rot there, because there were, so to speak, no shelters, no prepared sites, the americans insisted, so that we would untie these tanks from beyond the urals, transport them to a camp in the krasnodar region, well...

it was felt that he would remove the warheads from all russian missiles aimed at nato countries. nato members applauded, sitting next to each other, primakov and presidential press secretary sergei yastarzhamsky looked at each other. the latter had to give public explanations. the president did not mean removing warheads, but not targeting missiles at nato facilities. well , he could, he could have taken it off, in fact, it would have happened to him, but - the meaning of the then fundamental act was expressed in three formulas: no nuclear weapons.

politicians that there will be no nato expansion. moreover, the issue of nato expansion and , or rather, that it will not expand, was linked to the 2+4 agreement regarding the unification of germany, precisely because we can further say to what extent these obligations were enshrined, indeed they were enshrined not enough, but even in this form, when primakov, you

rightly say in january. in ninety- six he became minister of foreign affairs and even collected these statements, it seems weak assurances, just a promise, the westerners were very excited, already in february of 1996 telbat sent out a telegram to everyone saying it was terrible, pryamakov collected all the quotes of what we promised, in general gave instructions on how to now distort all this and refuse these promises , and since this is... the question is, it seems that these obligations were received, yes, weak obligations, why was it not possible to defend, because we have eternal problems with the westerners, we not only need to agree with them, honestly, this is already it’s difficult, and then you have to force them to fulfill what they promised, and for this you need to have full sovereignty, with sovereignty we sometimes had problems not only with economic opportunities, but with self-perception, for example,

the year ninety-five arrived - clinton in may, at the celebration of the fiftieth anniversary of the victory, she and yeltsen discussed, among other things, the issue of nato expansion. and for some reason, in the context of the issue of nato expansion, the issue of elections next year arises. and boris nikolaevich says: i wish there were better yet, nato should not expand before the elections. and as you rightly say, clinton told him exactly the opposite, and i, too , will have elections soon; in order for the elections, i need to expand. well, what does this have to do with elections, right? these are your elections, your people, win this regardless of the foreign policy positions that professionals must defend, in these most difficult conditions the priority for russian diplomats and for specialists from the ministry of defense has become the following: yes, it is clear that the westerners will still somehow expand nato politically. as far as i understand, the priority for

pryamakov was not to give. expand the infrastructure, like, you are expanding it with declarations, you are adopting, maybe distributing the fourth article, but not the fifth, such options also arose in the discussions of the nineties, but the main thing is not to expand the military infrastructure, don’t bring it closer, as a result of the most difficult negotiations we came to this founding act of ninety-seven, where it was recorded, another thing is that later they again could not insist that...

this is a great blessing, since this is the expansion of the zone of democracy, this was also, i would like to say one word about the fundamental one, that ’s what ivan said, i i’ll tell you this: we negotiated only with the americans, salana was there, so we negotiated with the americans, the americans leave, then he comes to salana with his delegation and highlights what we agreed on, we had one such point on regarding nuclear weapons, we believed that this

it is indisputable that the americans will not place nuclear weapons on the territory of the new members, but even in this they did not meet us halfway, they came up with this crafty formula, there are no plans, no need for intentions, no intentions, they didn’t go any further, well, i must say, that decisions in the north atlantic bloc are really made by the united states of america, i was also a member of parliamentary groups there for relations with nato that operated in the nineties, i was in brussels then, but at some point i simply stopped doing this, because there is no point not there was, there was a reinforced concrete position of the nato countries, once upon a time. i came there, talked to them about something, but is it possible to go here or a little here, they said, no, you can only go here, why? because this was the decision of the states, members of nato, and this conversation was absolutely meaningless, especially since they

declared that now they had saved the world, finally from the threat of the soviet union, communism was destroyed, and then, it seems, an era of peace , yes, let's see, the glorious journey, nato after it collapsed the soviet union and the warsaw pact. in the ninety-second, ninety-fifth years, this was a deliberate force operation in bosnia and herzegovina. ninety-nine, operation allied force against yugoslavia. 2001 - operation enduring freedom in afghanistan. 2008 - decision to admit georgia and ukraine to the alliance. operation unified defender in libya. creation of a high -readiness task force, 2015-2021 operation freedom guardian in afghanistan. 2016 deployment of four enhanced forward presence battle groups nato in poland, latvia, lithuania and estonia.

2019-2020 - approval of the nato military space strategy, opening of the nato space center. 2020, recognition of ukraine as a partner of the program.

i am happy when i develop every day, when i wake up and know that something new awaits me during the day, when we get together with the whole family and make dumplings with potatoes, cook, this is heaven for me, one might say, my hobbies. this is a journey, this is my favorite ice hockey, i have a dacha that has turned into paradise, a flower garden, i am proud of it, i started going to drawing classes, and i put my paintings at an exhibition, do music, do art, it’s very cool, i love you all, i love fishing very much, because there is a volga in rybensk, be happy, find good in everyone. second of your life, rom, castro, stellar group product, veda vodka, stellar group product,

old barrel cognac, stellar group product, burbon stirsman, stellar group product, wiski. mancatcher is a product of stellor group. kyiv propagandists have so distorted biography of bulgakov, which instantly turned him into an enemy of ukraine. since kiev is the mother of russian cities, these crazy people will abandon kiev. the sharikovs gave birth to offspring and are now taking revenge on bulgakov. now he has been declared a ukrainophobe and rightly so, of course, because they have finally started reading books. and also exclusive. in our studio there are fighters who captured the german marder, outdated equipment. sent here as a write-off, given to the ukronazis and a story about how ukrainian civilization appeared in the second millennium bc. antifake, premiere, tomorrow on the first. i feel

out of place as the chairman of the jury. perhaps all the most famous actors and directors in the world sat at this table. i'd like to have lunch please, but this is pasadena, we don't have restaurants. how did you feel in the film where everyone is? the actors played themselves and only you had a role, but whoopi goldbert is a policeman? how do the local public perceive our films? are they expecting some other round of russian cinema, a clinic? you criticize the american dream? no, i'm trying to tell the story of trisa banks and the last seven days of laura palmer, are you laura palmer? matador! on friday on the first, say that you like my hat, you don’t have a hat, i would like in the future to say that i did everything that...

there are all the things, three chords, the new season from

april 14 on the first. there's a big story on the air. recently, nato circles have been increasingly talking about war with russia. the military budgets of nato countries are growing like crazy. the prospect of ukraine's defeat is perceived as unacceptable. money. the press openly discusses the conditions under which the use of nuclear weapons is possible. will nato members dare to go to war against russia? and if they dare, how could it end? nato concept. involves all possible

assistance to ukraine, and moreover, nato is a party to the conflict. let's first read nato's strategic concept. the aggressive war of the russian federation against ukraine has disrupted the peace and seriously changed the conditions of our security, its brutal and illegal invasion, repeated violation international humanitarian law, heinous attacks and atrocities have caused untold suffering and destruction. a strong, independent ukraine is vital for stability. euro-atlantic space, moscow's behavior reflects a pattern of russian aggressive actions against its neighbors and the wider transatlantic community. we also face the constant threat of terrorism in all its forms and manifestations, widespread instability, increasing strategic competition, increasing authoritarianism challenge the interests and values ​​of the alliance. that is, russia is an existential enemy. well, for us, nato and... western countries are certainly a party to

the conflict in ukraine, as the secretary of the security council padrushev says. the north atlantic alliance is de facto a party to the ukrainian conflict, is actively involved in organizing the shelling of russian territories by neo-nazis, within its framework collective decisions are made on new supplies of weapons with an increase in their technical and long-range capabilities, nato instructors in several countries are training mercenaries and saboteurs for their participation in anti-russian operations. the plans of the united states and nato include preserving ukraine, or at least part of it, as an anti-russian territory entirely under their control, completely dedicated to serving the interests of the north atlantic bloc. in this regard , the tasks of demilitarizing ukraine remain relevant. as we see, there are directly opposing interests, colliding; how far can this clash go? well, everything will depend on how the situation will develop on the battlefield. they can talk as much as they want.

they can do a lot, but in my opinion they most likely won’t actually use their armed forces on a nato scale, why? because they, although very hard, but steadily and inexorably, understand that, as mr. bush said, he is younger, the world is changing,

and russia is also watching how it changes and reacts to these changes, and if before they were under... mr. yeltsin they could force anything on us, but now they won’t force it on us nothing, and they understand perfectly well that the determination of our supreme commander-in-chief is not limited by anything except the interests of the russian people and the russian state, it is these interests that now underlie our policy, and a special military operation is one of the elements.

contracting parties includes an armed attack on the territory of any of the contracting parties in europe or north america, the algerian department of france, the territory of turkey or the islands located in the north atlantic zone north of the tropic cancers under the jurisdiction of any of the contracting parties, on the armed forces of the vessels or aircraft of any of the contracting parties, if these armed forces of the vessels or aircraft were located in or over these territories or in or over another area of ​​europe , if...

there are no such conditions either in modern conditions or historically, it was used once and then for some very tense reason in connection with the events of september 11.

remnants of the kyiv regime in order to pump it up too, pump up the baltic states as well, it seems to me that they are now more inclined to take a pause, but they are very afraid, because this pause could work against them in some way, there is no unity within their countries, no agreement, there is obvious discord

between public sentiments and where the transatlantic elites are heading, so they are not only... afraid of us, so to speak, they are salivating, they are of their own population too, people certainly need peace everywhere, and this is a very serious deterrent for western governments. but nato now sees the main prospect of its strengthening, this is in ukraine, in fact, there is now a really powerful army, plus a state that is ready to fight, moreover, against russia, against their main enemy, unlike, by the way, all nato states, where there is not much -they are ready to do this, well, the question of ukraine’s membership in nato is always on the table, moreover, it is written down in their concept. nato, as actually already decided, let’s honor it. security of countries aspiring to become members of the north atlantic alliance is inextricably linked with our own. we

strongly support their independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity. we will strengthen political dialogue and cooperation with those who seek to join the alliance, helping to strengthen their resilience to malicious interference. we will build their capabilities and strengthen our practical support to advance their euro-atlantic aspirations. we will continue. develop our partnerships relations with bosnia and herzegovina, georgia and ukraine to advance our common interests in the euro-atlantic world, stability and security. we confirm the decisions we made at the 2008 bucharest summit and all subsequent decisions regarding georgia and ukraine. at the bucharest summit there were decisions on the admission of ukraine and georgia to nato. and this week, in connection with the celebration of his seventy-fifth birthday, antony blinken, secretary of state. confirmed, listen, we really talked a lot about joining ukraine at the nato summit in vilnius and we will

talk about this in much more detail in brussels at the meeting of the foreign ministers of nato member countries. as our allies said in vilnius, ukraine will be a member of nato. it is important for us to have a clear road map to get to this decision, and i believe that the nato 75th anniversary summit will be deeply and very specifically focused on exactly how to organize this road map. or, to put it more figuratively, this bridge, the very bridge that will allow ukraine to become a member nato. yes, indeed, it is constantly confirmed that ukraine, georgia, they will eventually become members of nato. moreover, a decision has just been made to organize a permanent nato mission directly in kiev together with nato, and, above all, american officers. and what this means is that yes, nato is preparing for war with russia, of course. a question of time, well, judging by the number of shells they supply to ukraine, missiles that are missing from

the armed reforms announced in germany forces that should last several years, it is clear that they want to lie timeout, but look, for the seventy-fifth anniversary of nato they published such special tables along with information leaks, in these tables, well, they give such terrible figures, where are nato troops by aircraft , tanks... russia, its sovereignty, of course, russia, will use in a crisis situation, yes, these are weapons, this is written in our concept, because the question

is, how can nato today, based on historical experience, also act today, first of all, the united states of america, based on the entry of new countries, this is finland, this is sweden, let us recall that when finland stepped 1300 kilometers, the border between russia more than doubled and...

what will this lead to such pressure, such a provocation on the part of the united states of america, here the other day stoltenberg confirmed the determination of the nato states to...

for membership, germany and france blocked, i remember how rai was swept away like a tigress, persuading, i demand to include at least this this formulation that georgia and ukraine will become members of nato, when it was not determined there, will now be reconfirmed, but i think that they understand that until ukraine declares its, so to speak,

neutral status, that it will not will join nato.

well, that’s the answer to the whole question, and if ukraine ever joins nato, then most likely it will be a polish province led by the city of lemberg, this could be, they have no other choice, and even then it’s unlikely , if they are very lucky, then maybe and this option is when another contender for world domination appears in the world, be it napoleon, hitler or modern america. he inevitably wants to do away with us, because it is russia that finds itself in the path of the newly-minted hegemon, he was pushed against russia, russia was broken. the west and nato are no longer the same, they do not have dominance in the economy, the brix countries produce more than the g7, their sanctions make us stronger, they are weaker, they do not have military superiority, their

weapons are of high quality, and in many ways parameters already and quantitatively. russian strategic deterrence forces have the potential to repeatedly destroy all nato countries combined, which serves as an absolute guarantor of our security. no nato formations on ukrainian soil will help resist the nazi regime in kiev; our country has a global majority, and the zone of their neocolonial domination is shrinking like shagreen leather, because the truth is on our side. we are winning, we will defeat this new reich, just as we defeated the third reich, so it was and so it will be, because our cause is just, the enemy will be defeated, there will be victory... behind us, all the best to you, see you in the big story on the first.

hello, the sunday time program is about the events of this day.