story about kazakhstan, my son agreed to help me. we really wanted to forget everything. and then this irina appeared here, her parents who saw me. everything went to hell. he knitted antique diamonds for them. it's not me, shamos. son, why did you poison? emil was going to tell irina everything. fool, it would have ruined me and would not have saved him, stupid fool, we had a fight in the morning, he gave me until the evening to leave, i agreed, and then, and then i mixed poison in his tea.

kotka, no one has made such connections before me did, it’s strange that you discovered him, found something to be proud of, bastard, what were you going to do next, run away, seamus worked at the airfield, stole fuel additives for the forest brothers, and i helped him counterfeit them so that no one would suspect anything, forest they promised to give us fake documents in return.

did you also make incendiary bombs for firewood? i think science stankus will lose nothing without you. get up, go out. well, guys. you went through fire and water together, all that remains are copper pipes, what’s new? rank, i don’t know about the rank, but there should be a wedding march, look. lana petrovna, oshentnikov and my

debt donated. wow, well, half the job is already done. so, peterush, come on, let's go, where? go-go. where to go? let's go to. a large part of the earth's crust that is not covered by water, and the margin is below the ocean. who remembers how many continents there are? yes. come on, answer. there are six continents. north and south america, australia, eurasia, africa and antarctica. yes everything is correct. okay, and the continents, who can tell me about the continents? in

broadcast a big game. today vladimir putin took office as president of the russian federation. frankly speaking, in the collective west, they were not very happy about this event, but there is good news, alexander dugin. state department representative miller said that although washington does not like the way the russian elections were conducted, nevertheless, they proceed from the fact that president putin is the president of russia, well, you see, they agreed, they could disagree, they agreed and agreed, that’s how you it seems that this year stage of russian development,

this is not challenging putin, this is simply completely destroying your image in the eyes of an entire civilization, i think it’s just stupid when they still, with gritting teeth , recognize the right, which we are absolutely not cold about this recognition ,

not hotly, but when they admit, they simply save their own, because if they continued this stubborn and completely self-destructive, self-discrediting... countries, i would be embarrassed if i were them, a few minutes ago, i received a message, text message from former president donald trump, who writes to me, please,

please support me immediately, i need it now more than ever because i am currently going through my trial, and to be clear.

so they, so that they can go home to elderly voters and help them fill out ballots, but imagine that in russia they allowed some party to go to voters themselves and fill out ballots without the slightest control from election

commissions, well finally, when all means mass media, probably, to be precise, i will say, almost everyone, was only engaged in...

will be on, as they say, on the right side of history, these countries are shying away from this, this is probably the first, second, you know , today, in front of the entrance to the alexander hall, already inside the large kremlin palace, before the start of the ceremony, a correspondent of the chinese news agency xinhua was waiting for me with his

questions, well, in general, it’s clear who else should ask these questions...

this is the first visit of the head of state after his taking office, yes, this will be exactly like this, and this is a kind of response to the same gesture of the chinese leader last year, when literally in a very short time, about a week or maybe 10 days after taking office, the chairman of the republic paid a visit , a state visit, again, to our country, so this is already becoming a tradition, we will definitely talk about what’s coming.

it will be possible to somehow influence him, macron spoke about this openly, but washington did not hide this either. will you be able to influence him? well, you know, the answer here is completely clear. of course, china's policy, china's foreign policy, formed with active participation under the leadership of chairman xijenping, it primarily meets the national and state interests of china, and these interests are broad, diverse and important for the modern world, but... mm, it can be to persuade, force, persuade something, well, in my opinion, this is completely, completely excluded. let's listen to what sizempin said in response to western criticism. we oppose the use of ukrainian crisis to incite war, discredit

third countries and incite a new cold war. history has repeatedly proven that any conflict. we call on all parties to resume contacts and dialogue and gradually build mutual trust. we support the timely convening of an international peace conference, recognized by both russia and ukraine, with equal participation of all parties and a fair discussion of all options for a peaceful settlement and support the construction.

the three of us will do everything possible to counteract, and i literally quote, to countering the side effects of the ukrainian conflict, then he listed two or three side effects there, the main one being extreme, at the very end: let's maintain the stability of industrial chains and chains.

in the western press, as they predicted the course of the visit of the head of china to europe, it talked about how great china’s trade is with the united states and the european union, how china and the west need each other, but for some reason so much was discussed at the same time as the west may affect china, but has not been discussed. but even the theoretical possibility that china could influence the west, they proceeded from the fact that after all,

china needs the west more than china needs the west, do you agree with this assessment? well, you know, there is a certain political inertia, but what can i say, the west is used to talking like this and gives up its habits with difficulty, but it does, so i noticed... such an inconspicuous, perhaps, aspect of this visit, you know, which there was no, there was absolutely no conversation of such pressure, impudently on china, as it was always, regarding human rights, well, always, it seemed to me that there wasn’t at all, there wasn’t at all, because always western leaders, there was always some uyghur there, there was democracy, some human rights activists, they always raised it, it was just like, you know, here, here, here, here is a gesture. to do this so that, as they say, it is said, apparently, now it has become clear, at least they understood that you can’t talk to china like that, you can’t

have conversations with the chinese leader in that tone, so something is changing, thank you, andrei andreevich sashentsov, dean of the mgimo school of international relations, when you look at the modern world, but this is understandable. that serious changes are taking place in the world, that this work has already begun, but is far from finished, how would you define the structure of the world in the current conditions, is it just a transitional period, or is it already clear not only from what, but to what? dmitry, your question contains great chronological depth, and i would like to link mine. with the words of andrei ivanovich, who mentioned that the first state visit chinese leader was in our country, i will remind you how this visit ended, saying goodbye

on... on the steps of the kremlin palace, shaking hands, the chinese leader, addressing our president, said: “you and i are promoting changes that have not happened for 100 years ". and the process of forming a new order is extremely fundamental and has great inertia, requiring painstakingness, and at the same time a great density of action, i use this metaphor. process, it consists firstly in defining the key principles, rules, norms that are mutually acceptable in a circle of large states that respect each other, probably an exhaustive list of these principles was first set out in a publication by evgeny maksimovich primakov in 1996, in the journal international life, the publication was devoted to the concept of

multipolarity, polycentricity. it is symptomatic that for the first time in our doctrinal practice in a document, an international document, the panetian apparatus of multipolarity was recorded in the russian-chinese declaration on multipolar world and the new world order of 1997, despite the fact that this period of the mid-nineties was still a rather intense period of experiments in the field of foreign policy, russia was looking for itself as the second... support of the west, our leader, and the president at that time moment still hoped that this process could be effective, but even then, seeing the failure of these attempts, russian diplomacy, russian strategic thought laid the foundations for what we now see as an emerging multipolarity, the same the principles that guide russian-chinese relations, non -interference, mutual respect for the interests

of... are not an obstacle to constructive, friendly interaction between states, they are in solidarity with the principles on which, for example, indian foreign policy is based, the five key principles of punch force, i believe that this is a consensus on the key norms and principles on which multipolarity, polycentricity, and that circumstance are built. that russian strategic thought came to them earlier than others now proposes them as universal, truly universal, in a sense, if this analytical conclusion is that the principles proposed by russia work like conditional laws of physics in international relations, then perhaps history will be on the russian side in the 21st century. andrey, in addition to being the dean of moscow state medical university,

you are also a program scientist. director of the valdai discussion club. i always follow the valdai club with interest. unfortunately, i was only able to attend one session, when i was invited to receive participation 10 years ago in a session with vladimir putin, but the very format of the club, when you basically need to come for a whole week, was unrealistic from the point of view of my duties in washington. but nevertheless, i got the impression

that voices from china, india, from the arab states, and i believe that the discussion that has been developing for the second decade at the site club, as part of its expert network,

and the leading intellectuals of these countries take part in these conferences regions, and the russian voice, the voice of russian experts, russian strategic thought can always be heard loudly, and they are looking for it, they are waiting for it, this was well shown by the results, for example, at the middle east conference of the volday club in february of this year, we discussed with you on the air the big game, its results, addressed to the minister of foreign affairs of our country sergei viktorovich lavrov, on the part of arab experts and representatives.

are beginning to deeply realize, perhaps are just beginning to realize, our sovereignty, our independence, our freedom, our reliance on our own strengths, on our own path, after all, until some last moment , to say that russia has its own path

meant to exclude oneself from any acceptable discussion, now it is almost a self-evident truth, but here we are faced with a very interesting moment, the president certainly understands this, this certainly feels... which is permeated behind the presence of the west, deeper, stronger and more fully, this is what, in my opinion, we will face in the near future, we need to enjoy our own russian path, the president is talking about this, we need to follow it follow, we must cultivate it, we must restore, revive russian philosophy, russian logos, russian science, russian culture in the full sense of the word, deep, fundamental, we must create our own...

connected, we cannot defeat ukraine, much less the west, purely technical means, here are more missiles, more shells, and we are already taking kiev there, this will not happen until we defeat inertia, until we defeat ourselves, we will not achieve victory at the front, but military victory is also necessary for our revival, these things are inextricably linked connected, i think that this is the term of the presidential term of the victory that we entered into today with our president and the people, the president agrees... he also spoke very clearly about this,

we’re leaving for advertising, we’ll be back in just a few minutes, we’ll talk first of all with senator denisov about president putin's upcoming visit to china. on the day of victory on the first. so, it’s clear what’s new on the music front, the blue handkerchief. dugout, smuklyanka, comrade commander. what have these boys done for us? the same fields,

roads, bodies, uh, no, the air is different, and the sky bluer and the earth is greener, we will live, we will live, as long as we remember, only old men go into battle, may 9, after the program, time, and if they give you a motto, where is the balalaika, we will get enough, several times... i have never felt or felt myself

an old man, i always felt like a man, for the birthday of vladimir etush, on saturday on the first. there's a big game on the air, a senator, and president putin's upcoming visit to china. i understand that the date has not yet been announced, that we do not know and cannot know many details. on the other hand, you know, as usual the preparation process is working, you have repeatedly been involved in... as an ambassador in beijing, what do you expect russia will do to prepare for this important visit, and what main parameters, from your point of view , will be discussed there? well, you know, in my current capacity i naturally have nothing to do with the practical preparation of the visit,

but this to some extent makes my task easier, because if i had, i would simply be silent like a fish and not say anything, otherwise i can. at least makes assumptions that are largely based based on what you are talking about, there really have been quite a lot of such visits, about forty over the past 10 years, starting from uh march 2013, the first visit of chairman xidzenping as the head of the chinese state to us, so count in 11 years, about 40 , of which, uh, most of them, probably 2/3, are... after all, at venues in third countries, on the sidelines of various kinds of international forums, but these were never protocol meetings, these were always serious negotiations between delegations, and issues were raised there , well, maybe more like this in a condensed context, all the main issues and the international situation of our bilateral

relations, but the main role is played, of course , by mutual visits, here as a rule...

leaking into the open information space, the content of this strictly closed conversation between the two leaders, therefore, as some say, as they say, i don’t know the sources, but this time the french side offered the same conversation, one on one plus translators, the chinese guests categorically refused, remembering exactly that the very case, and supposedly, supposedly... again with a candle, as they say, did not stand, supposedly macron managed to negotiate during a trip somewhere in the province, walks in the mountains, somehow to communicate, well , we don’t know what happened, and we probably won’t know, after all, the french must learn a lesson, but in our relations between our leaders

this cannot happen, they are tuned in to the same wavelength, they imagine the situation in the modern world in approximately the same way, they are equally or at least up to... national and state interests their countries, and their region, as they say, quite closely understand the essence of the coincidence, there will be a conversation around this, in any case, in any case, this visit should lead to very serious, primarily political results, i hope, economic ones too, well let’s not forget about the humanitarian side of the matter; after all, we already started on january 1. the implementation of a two-year exchange program in the field of culture, education, humanitarian and so on has begun, but we have not yet officially opened these years of exchange. maybe here i can only to assume that during the visit there will be an opening ceremony of these years, well , i would like to hope that vladimir vladimirovich,

besides beijing, will be able to visit some other one, for example, well, let’s not guess, because here, but in china, there are cities associated with our common history, including the history within china, yes, of course, but in our... states george washington, as you probably know, warned america against interference in european affairs, especially warned against any kind of permanent ones.

it saves me the trouble of talking about the specific chronology of the end of this crisis, while talking about the difference in our approaches to

what constitutes the content of this crisis. americans, anglo-saxons, and scandinavian religious traditions that inherited them still look at any confrontation as a conflict of high intensity, but at its core containing religious content. the lord must determine whose side he is on. borrowed by the americans, their method of conflict, which manifests itself in civil life, in the political life of the united states itself, it is acute, intense, it is public, he sometimes...

the peculiarity of this anglo-saxon approach is that they offer a conflict of high intensity, but they quickly switch attention to something else that appears on the agenda that seems more significant to them, this turning of the page allows them to go out, well relatively unscathed from rather shameful situations, you yourself know very well, dmitry, the content and circumstances of the preparation of nixon’s guam speech.

before the withdrawal of troops from afghanistan, several years ago, the american commander celebrated a great victory for american democracy, the american way of life in this country, in general, what i mean is that americans know how to quickly forget, turn the page, switch attention, and i believe that for them, when it becomes obvious that this is a ukrainian instrument, their politics, their strategy towards us, it has finally

fallen into disrepair, they will be of little concern about the geography of ukraine or in general,

the blow, but at the same time the russian people and the russian society, in which they deeply understand our worldview is now under differs from the west, he sees even in the opponent, even in the enemy, the image of the lord, he tries to understand how it happened that the lord loves me and him at the same time, this is an amazing depth that we have adopted from eastern orthodoxy. from the byzantine image, understanding of the world, in my opinion, she still guides us, despite the fact that our society is mainly secular, but this is the content of our cooperation, and the content of our conflicts, which are often non-public in nature, in contrast from american spicy conflict, public conflict, our conflicts are often not of a public nature,

which allows the opponent to save face, that very image of the gentleman. and i think that this is our deep inner understanding, it does not allow us to become deeply bitter towards our opponents. thank you, we are leaving for advertising, and after advertising, i hope that you will respond to what andrei andreevich said, it would be, it seems to me, a very interesting conversation between you, we are leaving for advertising. on the day of victory on the first. this year we celebrate seventy ninth anniversary of the great victory. let's talk about songs of the war years. i remember the infantry. for me , the most heartfelt songs are those that were heard in our films. death is not scary. a great song that alexander vasilyevich alexandrov wrote when

the most terrible battles took place. and of course, this song is a symbol of our army.

this is a war, a war against the people of donbass, the donetsk people's republic will answer the challenge. the key leitmotif of the maidan was the denial of us, and how... as a community as people, as citizens, to recognize that the heroes of ukraine are this is stepan bendera, henchmen of the fascists, well , we would definitely never admit this, this is exactly what we rose up against, we became free from the kiev junta, we only wanted one thing back to russia faster, everyone believed that it should be the way it happened in crimea , what has just happened, there is no way back, there is nowhere to retreat further, we are not aggressive, but we will tear anyone for ours, so we will bite our teeth into it. in our premiere on sunday on the first, they wanted a future for their child without war, liberated territory, a life line, we will defend the land anyway, no matter

what big game is on the air, i ask you, alexander, your opinion on what we talked about before... from morality in morality, this is impossible, evil cannot become good, good is evil, because good and evil are absolute things, friend is not an absolute enemy, in this war of forms there is also fury of confrontation, respect

for the laws of war, for example, do not touch civilians, these are wars waged by professional armies against each other, actually it’s similar , that's what i want to say that this is a war of forms, which presupposes... forgiveness, an agreement, cessation, some kind of coordination of positions, these wars, military forms, are waged rationally, between understandable states, they allow us to come to a post-war model, just then some kind of then another war or some period of peace, then what we are dealing with today in ukraine, in the confrontation with the west, by the way in the middle east and there for the uneven now in the pacific ocean, is a total war.

well, yes, different states with different interests collided, they did not divide ukraine, now there will be a war, we’ll see, we’ll divide who will win, and then we’ll negotiate, this is a war of forms, everything we are dealing with is a total war, everything is included in it, there are no borders in it, there are no rules in it , it simply goes towards destruction, and here the whole, the entire future of humanity depends on the victory of us or them, if we win, or in the case... when we win, the world will be, as you correctly noted, multipolar, this means so much, it means that we will have different value systems, each society, every civilization can protect them, we will recognize them, this is a completely new

map of the world, and if we don’t even imagine that in the event of their victory , the civilization with which we are at war, in fact , freedom will be completely abolished for all humanity, it will be imposed on everyone this is an unconventional agenda. everyone will be obliged to follow it, this war, in fact, is for the rule of the world, for the map of government, for the content, will we have one system of universally binding values, a unipolar world and domination, will the hegemony of the west be preserved, or it will be collapsed, so i think that, of course, if we win everything, after that on our terms, on the terms of our victory, we will say that you will look at western civilization just fine, like you, just don’t interfere with us anymore , we will have it traditionally.

biden, who prohibits everything, choose this, please, but the choice will be, if they win, no one will have a choice, not only us, so russia in this total war is fighting for all of great humanity, this great humanity is partly like you they said,

or this is unrealistic, because the enemy will strangle, so in order to survive, you need to carry out a revolution throughout the world , impose your form of government everywhere, these trotskyists, they were defeated, they were defeated by stalin, they were defeated in spain, and in general the second world war made them... irrelevant, then suddenly, suddenly , in the sixties, new trotzkyites appeared, a new generation of tratzkyites, which were called neo-conservatives, they first appeared, as you know, in the democratic party, because they after all, they were leftists by origin, then they did not like the american defeat in vietnam. they did not like the detente with

the soviet union, which was natural for trotskyists, they migrated to the republican party, and became the most inveterate american hawks, for many years, although there were very few of them in number, there were almost no followers among normal people, but they a number of reasons have managed to play a dominant role in defining american. foreign policy, and the main idea was the glubotskyist idea, we we cannot allow others to be different from us, here we are, well, if you want, world communism, here we have come to the stage when it cannot be better, when if someone does not accept our model of development, then they are either idiots or scoundrels , or both and...