and i bring everything to a compromise, with this, with this everything should end, but this is not a question of one year, this is a question of many years, i agree, but i think that his main concern, probably his whole life or his political life was, to prevent... that was the reason why he opened up the us to china 50 years ago, over 40 years ago, and i think he meant it again, he didn't want this war in ukraine to lead to strengthening

russia, but on the other hand, this also leads in contradiction, yes, this seems to strengthen the alliance between russia and china, precisely the same alliance that many globalists in the west do not like so much, well, not only the globalists, the same yastrem there, that is, they are ready to sacrifice ukraine, you know, i i think that they are not ready here, they are sacrificing, they are sacrificing in principle, this is true, but we remember that kissinger had many such projects that let’s somehow divide it up, we will include the rest of ukraine in nato and td tp, here i am i think that klaus schwab tried somehow coherently something. to say in this spirit, but

it didn’t work out, that is, he believes that he can determine the relations of russia with ukraine, russia with china, that is, this is the ideology of globalism, that is, he, he really understands himself as a superman, and he even you see, he speaks with some regret about kisinger, what do you see, this man looks at things much more clearly, he serves his american government, and i am much higher than them, i am a globalist, i serve this globalist elite, and he really thinks that yes, this is in his capabilities, in his ability. everyone and for some reason, apparently, because he considers himself smarter than everyone else, well, he is obliged and should and can do this, precisely because this is the biggest thing that the alliance between russia and china is preventing them from directly, let’s start anyway from the fact that it is not the first alliance that irritates both the globalists and the hawks, the first alliance that irritated very much is the alliance of schröder, chirac and putin, oh yes, this alliance is yes, it was called the worst nightmare of the american government. they did, pay attention

to what they did, so the second alliance, which , so to speak, is terribly annoying, is, so to speak, an alliance - the russian federation, the people's republic of china, which , in fact, is being done today, an attempt to destroy this alliance, that is, in their own words, in fact, the ideas that kisinger pursued, pay attention, because at the end of his life, when he was asked several times about the ukrainian conflict, he changed his position in a diametrically opposite way, then he said that russia should win, then it’s like the next day, when there was an article in the newspaper, they said: he’s gone crazy, everyone fell on him, everyone called him, he’s a poor hundred-year-old child, he didn’t know where to go, he, he, he’s here he said, guys, i generally renounce everything, i have a completely opposite point of view, then you called him, he seemed to have chosen some kind of middle position, this once again shows that in reality , uh, people who think, they have, of course, their own vision, naturally, a strategic vision, another thing is that there is political situation, within the framework of which they are forced to bend their position in some way, are forced. this speaks once again

that they do not actually control, but intellectually they direct this thought, because after all they listened to kisinjru, despite the fact that he changed his position three times. interesting from an economic point of view, because many western politicians called russia the tsar’s appendages, a gas station, and they themselves eventually lost access to normal energy resources, the nord stream, that’s because we are now talking about henry kessinger, because he... then admitted to us in a conversation that he believes that nord stream 2 was blown up by ukraine, it was a very scandalous statement, let's see, we called him then on behalf of zelensky, and he said in his face, what do you think, is russia behind the undermining of nord stream 2, what do you think, who do you think is behind the bombing of nord stream 2? who is to blame, do

you think, to be honest, i thought it was you, really, you thought it was us, no, no, no. but i didn’t blame you for that, it’s wonderful, i would n’t say that he was a critic, you could clearly see how he was thinking straight, his brain was exploding, the story about ukraine, it’s just such a politically correct answer, yes, considering how many rumors we see in the western press that supposedly the ukrainians, without the knowledge of the west, are there through poland, that there is a special unit of gur one way or another.

i recently saw a statement from sweden, which closed this issue legally, we don’t know, but it could be plausible, it could would be a plausible explanation. provided that ukraine did not trust germany and wanted to create a situation that, say, would force germany to physically, if i may

say so, become independent of russian gas. this is good news, unconvincing, but the key word is believable, it’s just his expression on his face when he was telling this, it feels like he really knows what to talk about and is thinking how to tell the world now that he really wants to, no, guys, he didn’t split it, well, it hasn’t been possible yet one politician, that’s why the chip is still there, he ’s not yet a superman, it’s funny how he reacts, what’s funny to him, that when he thinks that well, he told the truth, it was beneficial for ukraine, i’ll support this version, that’s for ordinary people, but many read the news, and are being investigated, if hypothetically they found the culprit

there or put a label on someone, which has already been put on the ukrainians, in the ukraine, what is the risk for the culprit, this is between nalma , he would be sentenced to 10 billion years of compensation for the ukrainian who is there... it seems that military intelligence officers were planning this very operation; he was already put in kiev and in prison, though on a different matter, that is , they had already covered up their tracks there; what you see were ordinary apparatchiks, zelensky , in the opinion of the west, did not know about this, but zaluzhny knew, and zaluzhny where he is no longer head vysu, what schwab thinks about how the conflict in ukraine will end and what he personally thinks about zelensky, we will find out immediately after the advertisement. for the anniversary. poet's command of the russian language in pushkin is some kind of witchcraft, this is magic, it feels like despite the fact that everything is ours, but everyone has some kind of personal relationship with him, he continues to help each of us out, support him, here are your favorite works, i love you, although i'm mad, i adore this

poem, a little strange, maybe an image of pushkin, this is just an example of such folk love, folk art, children really like it, podcast lab is on the first day. the final episode is tomorrow after program time, this is the show of vavan and lexus, and we continue, but we’ll see what schwab thinks about how the situation in ukraine can be resolved in the next video. and my question is: the situation in ukraine now, your position is that we must find some solution, since it is clear that any military operation fails.

i have to say, off the record, i have to say that on my last trip,

before the coronavirus hit, i went to st. petersburg, and i've known putin since 1993, when i met him for the first time in st. petersburg . where he was deputy mayor, i talked with him for 75 minutes, he to some extent already talked about the history of russia, as he did in an interview with tucker carlos, he told me that russia is not europe, russia, are you mistaken, klavst? russia has its own identity, its own soul, its own history, and so on. i have a feeling that maybe he really felt who he was talking to,

because, because it’s like he ’s leaking behind-the-scenes information, that’s what they say on the sidelines, i’ve talked with europeans a lot, really, there’s no difference, swiss, the british, they sometimes had such a relatively disgusting attitude towards russia, that is, it’s as if he takes a magnifying glass and begins to examine what kind of insect it is, and if he says, listen, insects in general, we are a civilization, then they really don’t they understand, for him it’s like a discovery, any globalist, he doesn’t believe in the existence of some unique culture that he cannot grind into powder, it doesn’t matter if it’s russian culture, chinese and so on, it ’s important for him that a new formation is formed people without their own culture, mentality, identity, history and everything else. the globalists, yes, from the very beginning they took a rather non-hawkish position, but now they have begun to change it, yes, against the backdrop of russia’s successes, they are afraid that russia will win.

in its purest form, schwab, at some point there was a discussion between how management should exist in the future, administrative, national, supranational, and schwab is precisely one of those who believes that the government should only slightly control, but in principle the whole life, starting from society, ending with the consumption of products, they are still controlled by corporations, he cannot think like a political elite, he still thinks like a corporate party, like a hatch fund that should invest in ukraine, he also said the following phrase: therefore, we we have to wait until something happens that will force us to agree, some kind of event, what kind

of event it could be, when negotiations can begin, i think that some kind of radical change on the battlefield, which will most likely force those there suddenly the westerners run to offer us some kind of negotiations, well, the point is that russia’s victory, relatively speaking, is big, well, he wants, wait, he wants a korean model, so that this works out, i think it’s more likely to change in kiev. this doesn’t suit him, let’s see what henry kissinger thought about it, how

the conflict in ukraine will end, and what do you think, is it possible to return crimea, are there any good forecasts for us, no, i think you, i think so, the return of crimea will lead to escalation. i was convinced that we had everything there were some public ones at the time.

there is a tendency in america to establish a ceasefire, but not right this minute. i think that our people think that you will not be completely successful in returning the territories, that you will be able to return some of the territories, but not all of them.

i think that here in europe the eu plays an important role in influencing it. i mean, we need to use zelensky to tell him that he will get what he wants, which is weapons. but as you now know, it is not possible to accept it into the eu and nato? no, this is understandable, but the prospects for this still need to be preserved. you have met him

many times and he still believes that it is possible to do this within this year, but as i see it, it is not possible. no, i agree, we need to use zelensky, promise him, as it were, but it is clear that we will not give anything, but not to fulfill these promises, everyone understands this very well, yes, that somehow this is all propaganda, on the one hand, and supposedly inclusion ukraine in nato or the european union, and at the same time even the apparatchiks there of the same brussels, and in the person of charles michel, say that that we will consider this issue somewhere after the thirtieth year, it is quite possible that we could never restrain ours, well , yes, yes, well, obviously, listen, as if...

but for the fact that they allegedly have children will have a european future, which of course will not happen. schwab is about the economy, about globalization, not about war, but schwab will look at ukraine globally only in one context, how much still needs to be invested in this country and for what. this is his main goal, under his jurisdiction; by the way, he should no longer understand why there else invest at least something. the americans are the first , that is, they have already fucked all their hogs. ukraine was interesting because of the land and the fact that it could feed half a planet. as a project, and we see the resistance in europe that there is today to the ukrainian agricultural sector, it is no longer interesting to invest everything, ukrainians are constantly striving for delivery, they always want to send their delegations there, they are there, they always believe that they will be among some european elites, but here he speaks directly, but the main thing is it’s impossible to promise them, we

won’t take them anywhere, that is, kesinger said there that in the belderberg club it’s ukraine. the ukrainian oligarch, who spent hundreds of millions of dollars to become one of the liberal atlantic elite, poured this money into the clinton foundation, and the clinton foundation, and what did he get in return? but he received, well, i think that of course a certain kind of, you know, indulgence, but no one is taking away his assets, and it will also be difficult to imprison him now in ukraine. although i i know that he had some problems in europe, well, yes, yes, well, if we look at others, for example, yes, ukrainian oligarchs, yes, how many problems does some firtash have, for example, and pinchuk, in principle, relative to others... relatively normal, but again, this does not mean that it will be normal in the future, but for him, you know, this investment project, to join the world elite, it’s like some kind of worked, so we have a question, what

future awaits the delivery and directly those people who are coming there now, what are your forecasts? i can only say that switzerland lost its status as neutrality in this case and economic neutrality, this was very important, because it was a miracle, i was brought up on the fact that... in the second world war to maintain economic neutrality, today they they lost it, and therefore trust, and this will have a greater influence on the forum fading away, but i don’t think it will fade away, well , listen, look, it’s clear that of course the pre-vost forum retains its influence in the west, but even here the positions are already shaky, and today we mentioned switzerland, but not so long ago elections were held there, the right-wing populist won, and those guys who criticize just such globalist institutions, if we let's see, let's ask a typical westerner who knows something about politics regarding klaus. the attitude would be more likely to be negative, yes, because there, regardless of conspiracy theories, not conspiracy theories, those people who play god, they are usually they're flirting, yes, in general society doesn't like it, yes, yes, that's exactly it, so

of course, the global south is on it, the pressure of the argumentative forum and there this whole agenda already has less influence, china sends its delegation, not so large, so , but even in the west, i honestly don’t think that at the moment he is as influential as he was maybe 10-15 years ago. precisely because, firstly, the split in society is very serious, cultural wars, everything else, and now dovoz is perceived as cut off from everyone, from of the entire society, liberal globalists, these are already such relics, probably of the past, yes, globalization, the era of globalization, its peak, which came in 2007, dovoz has influence in the west, great influence, dovoz’s attempt to influence the rest of the world, failed, no chance no, this is a split in western society, this is very good.

in 2024, russia celebrates a special date: 225 years since the birth of pushkin. the most beloved poet for many of our compatriots. when i was little, they read pushkin's fairy tales to me, and now that i have grown up, i read pushkin's fairy tales to his son. kalmyk is dear to us because in his novel, the captain’s daughter, he used an ancient kolmyt language. over the crow, every phrase, every line entered people’s hearts, then it’s necessary, a palace, then something else, we wish all families to always

read the works of alexander sergeevich pushkin. pushkin is our everything. hello, dear friends, this is the podcast life of the remarkable, with you i am its host, writer, alexey varlamov. this year we are celebrating a significant date: 225 years since the birth of alexander sergeevich pushkin. and it is about pushkin, about his role in the history of russia, russian culture, that we will talk with the general director. all-russian state museum and exhibition center ros and zolactionova. hello.

hello olga. an exhibition dedicated to alexander sergeevich pushkin opened at the state museum and exhibition center ros-izo. more precisely, this is an exhibition about how our people love pushkin and what gifts, what offerings they give to pushkin, the way he knows how, the way he believes. what is needed are these works done in the primitive genre, boxes, portraits, paintings, that’s how you managed to collect it, and what can you tell us about it? we have an exhibition in rossio, on petroviksky lane in the lower halls, which we really loved, which we did with tenderness and joy, the principle is that pushkin is our everything, that is, how the people in their...

are represented , this is a famous artist who worked in a naive style, it is known that she is all things, she died at the age of 17, unfortunately, leaving about 10 thousand works, she basically created some drawings, her echoed pushkin’s drawings, she has a lot of works dedicated to pushkin, and this is such a rather intimate exhibition, and we, i can say that we, for example,

show this type of naive art through the prism of pushkin, through the prism of this naive art and this people’s love, in addition, we pursued another goal, children really like it, and the boxes, this is naive art, they understand it, it is close to them, they are interested, and through this we can tell and instill love, because after all it seems to me that our task is to sow.

you have a clear, understandable genre or an understandable target audience, oddly enough, it expands, because you don’t pretend to be anything, and it attracts more than other audiences, that is, people go, that is , well, it’s understandable, but this is childish , i’ll go for children’s, and this is a lost cause, that is, it does not pretend to be any kind of complexity , high-mindedness, and this immediately inspires trust, that is, when you stop, when you don’t pretend to be anything, don’t try... art, we’re talking about people's love, that is, we are not engaged in some kind of complex research, we don’t pretend to do it, we don’t know how to do it, we have

wonderful colleagues in the pushkin museums, and a huge number of researchers who do this work, and if you ever need to organize some kind of inter-museum, interdisciplinary...

it’s language elements, maybe that’s why pushkin becomes a hero, it seems to me that there is some kind of connection here, and i think that absolutely there is one, it’s not for nothing that they say that a person of the nationality in whose language he thinks, pushkin’s command of the russian language , it's even not possession, it’s true, it’s some kind of thing, it’s witchcraft, it’s magic, i was recently at another event that took place in tsarina, there is sergei mikhailovich nekrasov, he is the director of the pushkin museum in st. petersburg, yes, this famous apartment .

i’m talking absolutely magical, transcendental, which, it seems to me, no other russian writer has been able to express. you know, i have - my personal, not so much tradition, i have a free day on january 1, and i sort out some things, well, this is preparation for next year, for the coming year, and i’m somehow sorting things out, there are some documents, remember, such a volume of publication of all the works of pushkin came out, such a big book. there was this, and it was around 12 noon when i picked it up, and then around 7:00 i woke up, sitting on the floor, i couldn’t tear myself away, what was i there, what didn’t i read there, well, that’s what i didn’t read , it’s you

who are really immersed in this, this is some kind of divine - divine providence, the way he mastered the language and how true this is, ours, how much this is about us, everything is about and about sensations, about dna, it’s probably not about, it’s not about mentality, it’s not about some other complex things, this is what we are made of, it seems to me that pushkin is what we are made of, and let’s say , now it’s the 22nd anniversary, and we were doing, not just an anniversary exhibition, a report, but i don’t want to do a report about him, i want to do something about him with love, this is some kind of amazing feeling, you know, something else... now i’ve come to head, there it is, do you love dostoevsky, no, i love tolstoy more, but i love chekhov more, no, but i haven’t grown up to chekhov, and pushkin is some kind of unconditional givenness and love, that is, you cannot say that you don’t love pushkin, or that you love pushkin, because this is our everything, well,

because well, this is where everything comes from begins in the love of language, and then we develop further, somewhat depending on our own preferences, there we already love bunin. or chekhov, again dostoevsky, tolstoy, and for world literature, unfortunately, this is a loss that cannot be translated, really, well... what is this, and then you translate it back, but so what? yes, someone told me that the famous pushkin poem, i loved you, love may still be, was translated into french, in the same place, it doesn’t sound french at all, it’s as if a schoolboy took it and wrote something, but in russian, here’s some kind of music, a mystery, something absolutely amazing, you know, language is generally such a story, for example, i really love, i don’t like it when

american musicals, classic, legendary, are translated into russian, the feeling is also lost, that is, our language intended for another, as if, and the english language for another, french, again there are beautiful french and elements and songs, which, when translated into russian, also lose something, that is, there is something that unconditionally... belongs nation, nation in the great, great sense of the word, but on the other hand there is lomonosov, remember, we also taught everything at school, where he said that you should speak in this language with friends, in this with enemies, in this about love , in russian you can talk about everything at once, and i indeed, i can simply sincerely say that the longer i live, the more i admire the russian language, the more it amazes me with what was given to you as a given in childhood, and you are simply there from mom, dad, grandparents . you live and live, and then you suddenly begin to understand

some kind of miracle, but really this language, as through pushkin, we actually feel it best of all, maybe even pushkin structured it somewhat, that is, he collected it into some something into a single form, from which we start from, because because of pushkin, i think, the language has changed in many ways, well, yes, he actually gave the standard, because this is really the most. oh, how nice for you,

you can wear such an earring even now, be at the mercy of the lord, come to me, now we’re not just quarreling, we’ll call our own mother, here’s your grandfathers, a new commander, well, are you silent, or don’t believe it, that i am a great sovereign? god knows you, sergei makovetsky, you will still be my wife. vladimir mashkov, forgive me, orthodox people, forgive me, in the film russian riot, on friday first, it will be hot, what, where? when the summer series of games is on

sunday on the first. dear friends, we continue, this is the podcast life of the remarkable, i am with you, its leading writer alexey varlamov, and today we are talking about pushkin and talking with the general director of the museum and exhibition center ros-izo olga galaktionova. you know, what’s very interesting to me is that it’s clear that pushkin was involved in the phenomenon of literature. many wonderful literature-vedas, but besides them, how many great poets, writers wrote about pushkin, and even remember the twentieth century, yes and verisaev pushkin in life, and marina tsvitaeva is my pushkin, and akhmatova wrote about pushkin, and andrei platonov wrote, and it’s interesting, but marina tsvetaeva has my pushkin, andrei platonov has pushkin our comrade, one work was written in paris, another work was written in moscow, and one can imagine a divided russian world. and yet, in soviet schools, where portraits of lenin and stalin hung,

they read pushkin, in some russian schools abroad, where portraits of nicholas or some others hung, they also read pushkin the same fairy tales, this is truly a figure who brought together the russians of the world, not only the russian language, but this russian world, without any cliches, clichés, without everything, this is a fact that was embodied in pushkin, this is of course terrible interesting, yes, it’s interesting, everyone has their own, that is, this...

a sense of humor is important, a good sense of humor, not laughing, what they call it, this is a witty attitude to life, to oneself, to everything, but what- then it immediately gives a feeling of life, he has an amazing feeling of life in all his works, i really love, or rather i say, it’s even so strange to say, i love pushkin, well, that, well, yes, well, yes, i love mom, dad, the sun, light, water, light, i love to breathe air , well, it’s like, well, this is from the same order of things, despite the fact that russian literature is the greatest in the world, in my opinion, with the love for a huge amount

of foreign literature, but russian literature is the peak, but this peak has a peak. pushkin in my opinion, yes, in fact, it’s very interesting, i really love talk about pushkin, yes, why is it not necessary to talk with specialists, because truly everyone has their own pushkin and here you can just exchange some phrases, impressions, works, so you just started talking about ruslan and lyudmila, i caught about humor , and there, what’s also very interesting, on the one hand, it’s like such a girlish work, we studied it at school in the fourth and fifth grade, on the other hand, pushkin very unobtrusively introduces such adult things that a child may not understand. then you begin to understand what we are talking about, but when chernomor kidnapped lyudmila and ruslan was there in horror, the author says through i don’t remember which of his characters, this poor ruslan, don’t be afraid, chernomor will not do anything to her, he is omnipotent, but he can’t do exactly what you’re afraid of, but the child doesn’t understand what he can’t do, but some kind of secret, some kind of

enticement, attraction, you understand, here’s the child, he doesn’t understand, but then, when he grows up, he understands what it can be, this is, you know, just pedagogical , this is such a normal introduction to adult life, yes, normal, as it were , preparation for the fact that in turn you will find out what we are talking about, but now in the most tactful, delicate form , as if they are starting to prepare you, in this sense pushkin is for all ages, as a child you begin to join his fairy tales, then really throughout your life, now i love reading pushkin’s letters there, his biography is terribly interesting to me in all its details, right now... just about at the tsarsko-rural lyceum there will be an exhibition there , pushkin’s power and pushkin and the state are really interesting, but these three kings who were in his life, the first scolded nanny for not taking off his hat, the second sent him away, which means he wanted to send him to siberia , but he went somewhere else, and i don’t want to change the third one, although we know that the drama of the relationship was very

complex, but what’s also interesting, because this is how bizarre pushkin’s fate was, at first he just took off, and young pushkin, it was absolutely cult figure. all of them read, then there was a feeling that pushkin had somehow outgrown his time, had outgrown the then russian society, which began to become disillusioned with the late pushkin, and he felt this bitterness, the cooling of the public’s attention to himself, but he himself did not change to please her , yes, he as if he knew his destiny, he went his own way, then subsequent generations began to catch up with him, as if they understood that the late pushkin was really such a height. this is precisely the late pushkin, but the cult of pushkin is curious how it developed, yes, it’s not right away, so we started talking about these works, i actually think that in the 19th century they might not have existed, because in the middle of the 19th century , pushkin seemed to be a little forgotten, he seemed to go into the shadows a little, only now he’s closer.