divorces, finnish social welfare authorities took away my beloved son, social services, they took him away from me, i was accused of suffocating maternal love, now her only hope is oleg, should i kneel in front of you , let me get up, please, she is a girl of a very controversial character, she is she is really very lively, she fights for her life, for her happiness, she wants a better life for herself and for her child, but every time she makes mistakes, she takes risks. oleg, of course, agrees to help his first love, but he does not yet suspect her plan to uproot the boy, but there is one more secret: nine-year-old voita, although he has a finnish name, actually never knew his real father, oleg, i need you to come with me to finland, claim your rights to your son, why, voita son, the son of the main character voight is played by thirteen-year-old mark malik murashkin, despite his young age, this is his twentieth film role...

he approaches every scene thoughtfully in an adult way, everything, everything, everything, everything, calm down, i’ll hold on, everything is fine, after all, weeded, everything is fine, i hold it, mom, mom, this kind of subconscious connection with my father is revealed, that is, they are completely different people in terms of upbringing, but in the course of the film they somehow still find contact with each other, because they, he initially exists, they are a son father, mother, they are catching up. there are a lot of adventures in the plot of the film, what is adventure, it's an action scene, when there is danger, when there are chases, fires, yes, we had many such scenes in the film that we had to film, especially the fire scene, it was very dangerous, we filmed in a dilapidated house, abandoned, which was under reconstruction, we will have a few seconds to pick up our son, she stole him, this russian takes everything she wants, a crazy chase in which each of the heroes will have to get to know each other again, forget their obi.

hello, live on channel one, time will tell the program, i’m artyom sheinin, today, as always, we will talk about important current events in the program, we will discuss or at least try to understand the motivations of the west, which continues.

they recognize the russian federation, that is they are hitting us, all this is covered up by talk that in the kharkov region russia , that is, they are hitting those territories that are advancing somewhere, despite the fact that russia has repeatedly, including through the mouth of its president, said that military operations in the kharkov region, caused by the ongoing shelling of belgorod, the need to create a sanitary zone and...

as confirmation of this, against the backdrop of this crying about kharkov, we must help, if it weren’t for kharkov, we would not allow them anything, but we are allowing , because kharkov this weekend 140 times per day and the ukrainian armed forces shelled the belgorod region 140 times. fortunately, as governor glotkov reports, there were no casualties, but the fact itself, that is, they did the belgorod region.

in the kherson region in the village of sadovaya, where even in these frames it is clear that it is absolutely obvious what has flown to where. and where people died, many people died, 22 people died in this village, that a french guided bomb flew there, hymers flew there. then the question arises, what kind of strategic military was it necessary to hit this village with western weapons? the question hangs in the air, therefore, because a conversation about strategic necessity can arise when we are dealing with those who think rationally. ukroreich does not think. rationally, so to speak, he adapts to the circumstances, that’s what those who give him these weapons do, on the same day, by the way, lugansk was shelled, six people died in lugansk, 60 people were injured, official statements that flew to

lugansk no, but in general it has been in lugansk for a long time nothing like that arrived, and therefore we can assume that, of course, it was something also western. and something very long-range, as you see in these frames, is the entrance to a house, that is, quite obviously, no non-military object, and there are none nearby. so this is what is guided by those who continue to arm the ukrainians, those who continue to support it, hiding behind all sorts of, so to speak, reasons and explanations, in my opinion, completely unconvincing, we will talk now after... short advertisement, do not switch , happiness, this is home, these are loved ones, relatives,

a synonym for the word harmony, oh, this is communication with children, their energy, i am recharged, it’s definitely great, we are often confused, if someone sees us, everyone says, oh... twins, protect your children, raise them with dignity, honesty, nobility, and be an example to them. our main family values ​​are to tell each other the truth, be sure to always listen to each other, always understand, we were raised so that we would always help people, our life is more comfortable because we are kinder. we want to confess our love to our native country. country, we love you. founder of the world economic forum in davos klaus schwab. without agreement with this person, not a single european politician wins an election or makes a single management decision. we need to use zelensky to tell him that he will get what he wants.

this process needs to continue, this donkey needs to keep going after the carrot. ukraine, at the cost of its own self-destruction, brings dividends. the game is going big.

so i can see, on your knees, hands behind your head, put your hands behind your head, i told you not to stick your head out, it’s true my friend, one chance for three, premiere, watch the time after the program, please be quiet, what kind of relationship are you planning to restore?

union of salvation, film premiere on russian day on the first, my system is intended for practical use. using it during sports competitions, well, it can be dangerous, but this is exactly what we need, victorich, well, how can i make fighters out of these dubolons in 3 weeks, you victor, are driving me into a corner, i have there’s only one guy, he’s sitting there, bro, should i shoot, are you here or what, i’m walking, but where i learned to fight, and somehow, we have several pain zones, now i’ll show you some options, i want to punch you in the face , i think here or outside, well, hit me

while no one is there, well, mercy, that’s it, that’s it, you can put me back in prison, i don’t care about your self-inflicted pain, the legend of samba, the premiere on friday on the first, why have you been silent for so many years that i have a son, but would you believe me with this russian? one chance for three. premiere. watch after

program time. time will tell the program, we continue to work live. and now we will continue, try to understand the agenda, understand the motivation of our opponents. and when i talk about our opponents, i don’t mean ukrorey, although it is clear that, well, the former ukraine. is opposing us on the battlefield, but it is clear that these are only ukrainian infantry, ukrainian, so to speak, these are living, still living people who are already fully armed and are being sent by the west as part of some kind of game, i must immediately make a reservation that since i i started this program with the words that civilians are dying from shelling at the front , the situation is also difficult, words about the game do not mean conversation. about something very cheerful, carefree, and so on, that is , not in this sense, not in the childish sense of the word

games, but games in the sense of certain combinations that are designed to influence the enemy in one way or another, to provide oneself with a solution to some then tasks, or interfere with the solution of the enemy’s problems, the word game is mentioned exclusively in this way, we have been discussing and... they are trying to solve a problem, or a certain military component, then what military political or information-political

component, but they continue to talk about it, here you go, salevan, being in paris, talks with an american studio, discusses this issue, listen to what he says . president biden recently approved ukraine's use of us-provided weapons to fire across the russian border. this is a new political step. did this affect the situation on the battlefield? from the president's point of view, this made common sense. what occurred in the kharkov area, which became the main news of recent months, was a russian offensive. it simply did not make sense not to allow the ukrainian armed forces to fire across the border in order to hit russian equipment and gun emplacements that were hitting the ukrainians. that's why the president gave permission for this. the ukrainians have already taken advantage of this permission on the battlefield. and here again, listening to salevon, i think about how he really says something

about, because she asks him how the situation on the battlefield has changed, he is talking about the situation in general doesn’t speak much on the battlefield, he says that biden is common sense, we further, they have already taken advantage, that is, by and large, he generally talks a little about something else, in contrast to what she asks, despite the fact that there are many experts in the united states itself, including writing and... talking about, well, people who, as they say, study the issue more or less appliedly, say that this is permission to use weapons in a military sense on situation on the battlefield. will not be able to have a critical impact, yes, it will create additional difficulties, yes, will lead to additional casualties, but just answering this question, which salevan did not answer, no, the answer from this expert sounds, the situation on the battlefield, it cannot critically influence, at the same time, but another one appeared, such an interesting

nuance appeared that official representatives of the armed forces of the ukroreich... began to say that they would soon have their own guided bombs. listen, we are currently working on re-equipping the creation of our own adjustable aerial bombs based on ordinary. there are some design nuances there. you need to select a wing, a gps module, and a control module. in a few weeks, we should begin the first tests of the first batches of such bombs, already ukrainian. it's amazing how they somehow... all this coincided with the creation of these bombs very, so to speak, they came close to testing, exactly after the west began to emphasize that they were allowed to use weapons on the territory of the russian federation, which makes me assume, not to say, but to assume that i approximately i represent whose will these guided bombs be, where will the gps modules come from, everything else, here we

come to the very question with which i started, is this all, what is it doing now? to grind down this ukrainian defense, the ukrainians, the ukrainians had to stand in , it was necessary to swap the russians' blind defenses, the russians should start , but by this moment the russians already had full-fledged aviation, that is, bombs appeared,

missiles appeared in sufficient quantities, a tool appeared with which in general, we continued and... not only defended ourselves, but move forward, causing completely unacceptable damage to ukraine. somewhere around december, it became clear that this strategy, which was based on the fact that the russians should lose three times more than the ukrainians, did not work out at all, and accordingly, it again became clear that by the spring, as planned, americans, the ukrainian army will not be able to rest and replenish its reserves, and first of all because of losses, because the losses were huge, simply catastrophic, secondly, because... to collect the same amount of equipment and weapons, how much was no longer possible, at that moment he was replaced by the chairman of the committee of chiefs of staff, a now famous black comrade by the name of brown appeared, who proclaimed with the nickname swamp creature, and swamp creature, who in general proclaimed a clarification of this directive, that is, it was still the same the same, but now the task is the following:

to destroy russians wherever possible, everyone possible, in fact, i will remind you that indiscriminate attacks on... our territories began precisely with the arrival of this handsome guy in january '24, because according to his plan , any killed russian is counted, this puts psychological pressure on putin, this psychologically puts pressure on the russian leadership, and then, as a pilot himself, he started this whole topic, well, so accelerate in a modern way, that is, in this case they began to study the history of the f-16s a lot, they attached planes to these f-16s. derlo, which naturally improve the quality of their use, and accordingly, then he began to hang everything there that could be somehow aviation component. the idea is, the current idea of ​​a war of attrition, at this stage, is two things: the first main military task is to win the summer from the russians, to prevent the russians from attacking successfully in the summer, for this the attacks must

be constant, the attacks must be to the full depth , first of all, not even in cities, this is already... accordingly, a certain speed is maintained, a certain direction, and they have to fly at low altitudes, now they have to fly at low altitudes, because that our air defense has pinned them all down, now they have a task, they have been actively fighting

our air defense for a month now, they are putting everything they can into it, the attack aircraft are flying every day, the task in this case is to push back, that is, russian air defense from front and give them the opportunity to move closer and begin what is called a fight with our second echelons and stopping us. intelligence, reconnaissance means, of course, the west and nato are superior to us, well, let’s be honest, many times over, these are hundreds of satellite systems there and uavs, reconnaissance aircraft and... communication centers, reconnaissance centers, that is, this is a huge machine that allows them, in principle, to have complete information, and our deployments, at least that which they can quickly open, yeah, their main

problem is that the means of destruction, then there are implementations of this reconnaissance, they have very little, this is about 50 of all high-precision rszzo, mars and khaimars for the whole of ukraine, and accordingly, in this case, again, which is necessary, at least if... uh, any technology, which now appears in front line, if we do not successfully use rap, if we successfully, no matter how our entire system is not used, then of course

we are suffering losses, it’s like there is nothing to hide and there is nothing to lie, so i say again, the global task is not to let us to carry out a summer offensive, they are trying to solve it in exactly this way, vulnerability, as i already said, is a fairly small number and storm shadow. in vietnam, our s-75s, our anti-aircraft gunners wrapped them in bundles of bamboo, which they protected from exactly the same cassette guns,

which are arriving now, only now they are called atakomsa, before they were simply dropped from great heights there by attack aircraft and there were exactly the same bombs, that is, this is a fragmentation grenade, in fact there are only hundreds and thousands of them there, that is, if we were doing this then, then who is stopping us today from reserving our air defense systems, shelter... again, not standing on the cables, as you often see, even on ours, which you watch our filming, which is on the news and the systems of our denite-missile systems are standing on the cables , that is there are cables, there are 80-90 m per cable, the ideal area covers the entire division, who is preventing us from now turning on the mode that we have, the digital mode, digital control, when there is the same one there , relatively speaking, the launcher can be dragged for 400-500 m, do you understand? that is, the question is not about their strength, the question is about us, how we will react to this and how we will give it to them, we have every opportunity to disrupt this so-called

strategy, but it must be done, here’s how times in development of what you are talking about, regarding our actions, our responses, correctly calculated, so to speak, correctly calculated reaction, and maybe not only reaction, here is the same representative of... just about those same planes, please. not all f-16 aircraft that will be transferred to ukraine will now arrive in ukraine; some of them will remain in the centers where our aviation personnel are trained as pilots. there is a certain number of aircraft that will be stored at safe air bases, not in ukraine, so that they will not be targets here, and this will be ours reserve if necessary to replace faulty aircraft during routine maintenance. well, as always, in one bottle with conversations about the possible provision of f-16s, although i don’t know about you, i noticed how it was purely

theoretical, then simple. theoretical, then possible, possible, now all this is already being discussed not as, so to speak, yes or no, but is being discussed, i emphasize, the truth is the word, is being discussed, as if it were reality, they are already discussing where they will place them, what we have, what we don’t have and so on, and as always, in the same bottle with this there is a discussion of pilot training, that’s what’s wrong with this, and at least, as the politico describes it, ukrainian officials are demanding from the united states. and other countries to intensify training for f-16 pilots. kiev says there are 30 pilots who are eligible to immediately begin training in the united states. however, according to three people with direct knowledge of the matter, the biden administration has told kiev that its varezone center does not have enough space to accommodate more than twelve interns. simultaneously. two other institutions in denmark and romania have similar problems with training places. a total of 20 ukrainian

pilots are expected by the end of this year. will complete training to fly the f-16, this is only half of the required number of specialists. again, you listen to this news and, well, taking into account the scale of hostilities, the duration of the front, and so on, you seem to think that, well, the conversation there is 10-12, and so on and so forth. in general, these aircraft in the quantities in which we are now talking, especially moreover, they are already discussing that some of them will be based at airfields.

soviet times, there are more than 80 concrete bunkers, for each plane, so they sit out there well, why don’t we still have them, this is not a rhetorical question, however, i repeat, at the moment they have 12 left, they are a factor in combat actions, yes, if we remember everything that happened with the help of these missiles, we were hit one way or another, then of course this is a factor, is this a factor that affects the course

war, no, but unconditional. so that i say again, first try to push ours away from the front line, and then , with the help of these 16, start hunting for our su-34 aircraft, to which they have nothing at all to oppose, because the problem of the current ukrainian armed forces is that they have been unable to do anything for a year to oppose our aviation means of destruction, and accordingly they lose a huge number of people, this is not the essence of the heaviest loss, aviation perfectly paves

the way forward for us, when this... is very much formulated like this: to put russia in front of the impossibility of winning the war, that is, to turn this war into an iran-iraq war, in which you can fight for 10 years, but you will fight endlessly, bear the burden, so to speak, but i will remind you that no matter how it sounds, but when iraq was finally able to figure out what needed to be done, then within a year they changed the course and outcome of the war, uh-huh, simply because in this case they formed the same

famous republican guard corps that changed all this, well, let's hope that we will do something much earlier too, let’s hope that we will also do something, by the way, you were talking about these capanirs, i read an article in... bloomberg today, which means that it’s basically about something else, but there’s an interesting nuance there, that a certain, that means , a man from nato, assistant secretary general of nato, david vanville, says that they use artificial intelligence to process satellite images to calculate the refueling stations available to the russian federation, that is, they proceed from the fact that no one built any compositors, does not build and for some reason does not i'm going to, well, because actually. they load pictures there, based on the fact that in the pictures the planes were still standing and still standing, this is such an interesting nuance, now we’re just moving on to the political aspects, which, of course, i don’t share, war politics, i’m fine i understand that

political problems are solved by military means, some political statements and moves are a way to influence military actions in one way or another, but nevertheless, in your opinion, this new, well, it’s still a new stage in some way resisting.

in them, as for them, the cavalry guards have been measured and their number is also clear, which means, plus everything, i want to note, this is what accompanies everything, this, of course,

is on the f-35, as far as i remember, these are these planes, so to speak, used, they will deliver the decisive blow, in just 4 years, at least at the moment they are going to deliver 85 aircraft, four european countries, stretched over 4 years, well, any person who pays any attention to the scale what is happening will tell you that with such a conflict stretching for such a number of kilometers... 85 aircraft in 4 years, they solve the problem radically, but they want to demonstrate , including to themselves, self-excitation, so we will deliver, here we will now offer, and so on and so forth, this is of a twofold nature for internal use and so that ukraine and ukrainians believe that they will be helped abroad, that not today is tomorrow, victory is close, we still need...

that any lesser, sober-minded or

simply cunning resident of the territory of the former ukraine, well and even more so in more than two years everyone somehow more or less started something, understands that this is not enough for any victory, but at the same time they continue, that is , they, you know, as in this russian proverb, they won’t feed you, they won’t let you die of hunger , by the way, i’ll intervene, well, intervene, just the last offensive, they gave everything and even more, that is, they really did that moment... they believed that they were capable of something, well, okay, at that moment they believed, but in such quantity guns, aircraft shells, you can defeat russia, but since a year ago, a year and a half years ago it turned out that it was impossible to win, well, we must come to the following conclusions, they now say, well, now there will be f16s, well, that’s all, well, you just said that any mentally healthy person understands that there can be trouble from these f16s , but he can’t change anything critically on the battlefield, which means, well... they’re still the same, well, there are 30 planes, 12 pilots, and

the conversation begins that there are no places for everyone, so in fact, this is a strategy, if it’s possible call it a strategy, is different, to make border territories, preferably as far as possible from the immediate battlefield of the territory, which is actually a target for attacks in order to set in motion the russian population, which of course is experiencing difficulties because of this. he won’t say this, because he needs to give out

completely different information, he needs to turn everything on its head and thus convince him that he’s right. well, by the way, in the conversation about who is doing what against the backdrop of this conflict, why certain statements are being made and what problems are actually solved by those who do them, here’s another new one, well it’s not like it’s a movement, but this interesting nuance appeared from macron, that is, that’s all. we still have the same philosophy: we help ukrainians, but we don’t want an escalation of the war. we are in no way at war with russia and its people. in practical terms, what are you going to give to the ukrainians? we are going to start a new cooperation and are announcing the transfer of the mirage 2000. these are french combat aircraft that will allow

ukraine to protect its land, its airspace . starting tomorrow we are starting a pilot training program. this. while that even the western media write that, firstly, they can give no more than six of these same mirages, because they have only 26 of them, and in order to have at least some combat left, which means one, they can only give six, moreover, the western media write that this is not the best aircraft and it is not suitable for these tasks and so on, again the same question, they are throwing dust in the eyes, throwing dust in the eyes of someone, the ukrainians or french voters or someone else...

it seems to me that for a moment he felt an urge, it seemed to him that due to the fact that biden could not even sit on a chair during the events that took place in normandy, he had a chance to come forward as the leader of a united europe, which pursues its own independent policy.

they said, this is some kind of another reason around which you can build some of your own structures, it is around her, well, or , as it were, around her that macron has been building for more than a week now, and probably not even the first month, this story, that in some form, not just a carcass for stuffed animals, but there

should be some western military personnel, well, let’s listen to him himself, regarding the sending of military instructors to ukraine, how are your negotiations progressing with other european allies and the united states, and whether france is actually ready to send its instructors if other countries refuse. it is much more effective and practical to train soldiers on the territory of ukraine. this is a legitimate request. we are not in state of war with russia. we don't want escalation, but we want to do everything in our power to help ukraine survive. is training mobilized soldiers on the sovereign territory of ukraine an escalation? no.

a coalition is not a coalition, he comes out with this, well , this is how many times, not for the first month, he continues to move forward in these initiatives, and even well... his own conditional ones, but somehow from him, it means that it distances itself, well let's listen to who, the germans, let's listen, the governments

of germany, italy and spain are against the idea of ​​french president emmanul macron to send military instructors to ukraine. the french authorities sent an invitation to dozens of western countries to join mr. macron’s idea; even before macron announced his intention to form a coalition, the chief of staff of the french armed forces, pieri burghart, sent the united states. a letter to european countries in which he invited them to join a coalition of the willing, which would organize a training mission in ukraine. why am i asking these questions about macron, as if - this is in development these latest ideas of his? to be honest, i don’t fully understand whether it is necessary to discuss all these initiatives of macron as part of a discussion of the confrontation with the west, the conflict in the territory of the former ukraine, but that is, this kind of relates to the general history of the conflict and the disease. or is this some separate daddy with a history of macron’s illness, who at the same time lives somewhere in some kind of his own reality, solves some of his own problems and

so on, because well, i repeat again, every time everyone looks at him a little how on fool, although at one time we discussed that maybe he was chosen like that, because he is such a rooster, well, in the political sense of the word, and he likes feathers, that means fluffing them up, so they are through him , the overton window, behind the overton window is like a roll-in there. in your opinion, what is this about? and is it necessary to pay attention to this at all if you are not interested in the internal politics of france? no, well, of course, you need to pay attention to this, i would say that there is a multi-volume criminal case, well, and there is this one somewhere the bird is on macron, but it is part of the whole process, as for his personality, of course the gali rooster is a symbol of france, but because of the way macron behaves, i would say that he is a peacock, he likes to spread his tail, peacock feathers.

the product called the kiev regime is perishable, so vladislav used a wonderful term, freezing, they add some kind of military substance in order to freeze it, to add cold, so that the kiev regime, well, does not go rotten and does not deteriorate, does not fall apart, so that they turn on the refrigerator of war at a higher temperature, because it is getting hotter.

a military conflict was needed, why? in order to influence russia with this conflict, to what extent? in order to subjugate russia. they think in global categories. please note that now, when each time either trump or biden speaks, it doesn’t matter, the essence of what they say is always the same. we will not allow an alternative to be created. we are a hegemon, we want to control world

processes. within the framework of this desire. they are not can allow not only the sovereign position of russia, which they do not want to allow, they want to use russia as a tool, they only have tools, they think of themselves as such a demiurge, who has ukraine, south korea on his table, germany lies there, germany needs to hit someone blew up the nord streams, ukraine needs to hit russia, they hit, that for this, we need to make a new handle, but then the tool breaks, they throw it away, they want russia.

well, we don’t break this game and don’t start influencing them ourselves, but adapt to, then we say this, if you do this, we will then do this, well, but if you don’t do it, we won’t do it, well then it turns out that we continue, wittingly or unwittingly , to be in their plan, which you just described, and it depends on which side you look at, i’m always with ours, and i also look with ours, but our position, it’s reasonable,

is not to voice all our plans. in this sense, we are much smarter than the kiev regime, we are even smarter than western politicians who try to voice everything they do, so let’s look at their actions this way are a reaction to our actions, they are forced to provide more and more serious weapons, because you can’t stop us with less serious ones, well, what konstantin fetovich was talking about, everything is clear, now we’ll rush into advertising, then we’ll continue, i would like to know why? the traitor of the ants has not yet been stopped by you, after the sad events in the capital, some impressionable people will see in them almost heroes, not you, our goals are right, our methods are criminal, i

dream of getting an answer tomorrow morning in the senate of nikolaich. will reveal himself as emperor, history is happening in st. petersburg, here she is dying, tomorrow everything will change, you have a senator, you have wealth, service, what do you need to change, let’s elect a dictator among us, we’ll enter into negotiations, what kind of negotiations, we just shot at them, if he if we don’t decide, we’ll weigh it ourselves. in france, aristocrats were hanged from lanterns. if it’s like in france, then everyone present here should hang. they won't dare shoot at us. we did not shed a drop of their vile blood. yell! well, a match that will light

everything and burn itself out. union of salvation, film premiere on russia day first. cnop gin is a product of stellar group. cognac monte chococa, a product of the stellar group. rum castra is a product of stellar group. product of steller group. product of stellar group.

founder of the world economic forum in davos, klaus schwab. without agreement with this person, not a single european politician wins an election or makes a single management decision. in favor of the golden billion, the main super-idea of ​​the globalists is opposed to traditional values. russia gave organized political and military resistance to this doctrine. appeared visible alternative. klaus schwab. mopping and

their conduit. dolls of the heir tutti. today is the first one. you are at the dacha, and we are at the dacha, anything can happen at the dacha. special edition of the program to live healthy, we will plant, sow, treat pain and generally understand the charms and problems of success, tomorrow on the first, my system is intended for practical use, using it during sports competitions, well, it can be dangerous, that ’s exactly what it is what we need, well, how can i make fighters out of these blockheads in 3 weeks, you victor for...

"you can put me back in prison, she spat on you for your self-pain, the legend of samba, the premiere on friday on the first, i love you, i beg you!" the hands of your daughter, the union of salvation, the film premiere on the day of russia on the first,

the program time will tell, we continue to work live, here we are, talking about what is happening on the battlefield around the battlefield on the territory of the former ukraine, and... we went to conversation about the fact that, well , it seems more or less clear what they are doing, they are prolonging the conflict, solving their problems in one way or another, and we just talked about that as long as we, well, one way or another adapt to their step, it is not very clear how we can break out of their game or their strategy, and nikolai starikov quite rightly said that we certainly do not have all our capabilities we voice, not all of them... we show our capabilities, that’s it, but it seems to me that some of these possibilities or options for the development of events, and we, too, not loudly, as they like, but so with

a clear hint, just literally now, exactly we are talking about the fact that admiral gorshkov, the newest russian frigate, which is capable of carrying, which does not mean that it is carrying hypersonic missiles at this moment. he arrived in the capital of cuba, located just 180 km from the us coast. i won’t develop it further, because for those who follow the agenda, including political history, here it is right away.

many here are many reactions that we would like to receive from them. let's listen to rubio. there have been no russian submarines with nuclear missiles in the caribbean for more than 30 years. if the cuban authorities allow one to enter a port just 150 km from our shores, then the biden administration must enforce real consequences for them. that is, in a sense, we are launching one, as if we are not threatening anyone, well, we’ve kind of gone there. but i see behind this, i say again, i don’t want to go any further, this is the same parallel asymmetric response that we discussed here last week, which here says: so, if you hit some other with a rocket, then we ’ll hit you with a nuclear weapon, or if you have some kind of planes there, then we’ll use some polish language, no, it’s like there’s another polyana, how would you like this, friends, if you could talk about being ukrainian...

how romantically idealistic would that be? well, of course, this brings up such a well-known term that we remember from the beginning of the 20th century, gunboat diplomacy, it really meant a little differently, but in the sense that the ships sailed far away, and there, so to speak, they meant not only the flag, but also represented strength. of course, the entry of our ships into cuba is, first of all, like a final break with that long period...

well, in general, there would definitely be nothing superfluous in this, that is, we are starting to return our, or at least demonstrate our military infrastructure where, in general, we once were and where we specifically created threats for the same americans, we say, that today we came there to rattle weapons, but we really don’t know what’s on board, except for hypersound, because in principle this ship is a carrier of nuclear weapons, sorry, because it’s already been announced that... well, i’m talking about , what are they

are one way or another some kind of symbols, they are such because in general you understand, and if, say, in the fields in poland there is talk of deploying nuclear weapons, then it is quite possible that there are other options, it’s another matter whether kubo will go for it, because we again we simply lost a large amount of time in vain, as well as our own positions, but how can i say it, nothing can be returned back if you really want to.

what happened after the bombers flew there, our advisers appeared there when the americans tried make a small coup there, but nothing came of it. by the way, who remembers the name of the new president of venezuela?

that we will be here, we will help, and we will be the force on which you can rely is fair, but i’m talking about the fact that all these demonstrations there with venezuela and so on, it was a slightly different situation, you understand , this is a very good a, but the question is what b may be required for this, if we continue along this path, in your opinion, this is generally, well, let’s say this in general, a promising move, well, firstly, i am sure that within the framework of plausible deniability... in cuba, here in russia, all these memories can be answered, we had plans, we had before, without any operation, which is taking place now in ukraine, we planned to make visits to cuba, they

came to us, but if we say that we achieved the goal, we achieved it, because senators rubio are all sorts of other senators, or else... he talks about a topic that he well known, and well known to their voters, is the cuban missile crisis in the sixties, and although yes, there are no missiles here, on these ships that we are going to leave to cuba, there are no nuclear weapons, which apparently was the condition for their coming to cuba, but still the image of the caribbean crisis arises, which, unlike what is happening in ukraine americans, at least the older ones. generation is much more understandable, in this this goal has been achieved, but when generally speaking, the president said that if, through the hands of the ukrainians, they are trying to cause damage to us by supplying long-range missiles, then why not in other ways, then

why don’t we also try to harm them with someone else’s hands? here we were talking about nothing more, we were talking about the possibility of supplying our weapons to dangerous... areas that are the subject of constant conflicts, that’s what we were talking about, and i think that this is a very promising idea that has no at the moment, after the missiles, american or foreign, have arrived, there are absolutely no moral restrictions, because if they do it, then we have the right to do the same, finding enemies of this western world anywhere in the world, they are there, based on...

the fact is that we, of course, have become smaller, but at the same time, unlike the ussr, we have good relations with china, they will develop, too option, firstly, i wanted to correct the surname of this very impostor, izusezuela, from six letters, it begins with g, ends with o, but from six letters, not from five, but this does not change the essence of the fact that he is an impostor, it depends it varies depending on the transcription, yes, but it seems to me that we’ll have six, well, we ’ll have one.

the question is that after this or maybe other b. here is ruby, he seems to be simpler, someone more cunning will say, oh, okay, they came, they will leave, and then what, well, this is about what was, now a few words about what is, but... first, the entry of our ships into cuban ports is certainly creating a threat to the united states of america, this is exactly how the united states perceives it, this is exactly how we need them to perceive it, of course, a nuclear orgy. no, we are people of good will, but as soon as we entered havana, they immediately rang the bell: cuban missile crisis, nuclear weapons, russians

rockets. what is the difference: when khrushchev placed russian and soviet missiles in cuba, they were soviet missiles and were not transferred to the control of the cubans. what the president voiced the other day is a completely different approach, but this approach is unscrupulous, the spare former partners, they essentially... well, i don’t know, they even imposed it, because helping the enemy, one’s enemy, is an old diplomatic practice for centuries, but this was always done veiledly, through third parties, if they said anything, we don’t know who it is does, but these rules are americans, they abolished these rules, they say: yes, we supplied the weapons, but we are not fighting with you, moreover, we are trying not to fight with you, so we too, what we tell them, and we we are not at war with you either, but we supply our weapons, we can supply them to yours. enemies, this will not be our weapon, it will cease to be ours, as you taught us at the time of the transfer, that’s it, this is

now someone else’s weapon, so here, i think, cuba is in this case a bell, such a warning that, like there are options, that there are options, and there is another important point, americans always need to be brought back to reality, this is how they think now, they think about ukraine, who don’t feel sorry for them at all, poland, europe, yes, as they say, they don’t feel sorry for them either. what will happen, but nearby, and there nearby, there is a bell, guys, it’s not ringing for poland, it’s ringing for you, that’s the difference in the situation after the arrival of our ships, i tell you what it’s called, your boosts smoke to drink, i i just want to add here, within the framework of objectivism, that at the same time you should always think about what the one who takes this weapon from you can get from this , who is born with the americans, the british and the french, so the soviet union has such leverage and...

the united states, so a hint, i think that they understand very well, oh, oh, this is very important, that they understand hints very well, now the question is how they will react to these hints or not, that is, will they pretend that it doesn’t matter, or will they somehow, well, time will tell, but we’ll discuss it in this studio, now advertising. i am happy

when i develop every day, when i wake up and know that something new is waiting for me during the day, when we get together. be happy and find good in every second of your life. the founder of the world fishing, because there is a volga in rybinsk. economic forum in davos, klaus schwab. without agreement with this person, not a single european politician wins an election or makes a single management decision.

we need to use zelensky to tell him what he will get. who wants what, it is necessary that this process continued, this donkey needs to continue to follow the carrot. ukraine is paying dividends at the cost of its own self-destruction. the game is big and long, it was created by henry kissinger and the rockfielders. they are truly building a new world order. the future is created by us. famine, pandemic, war. this year they are discussing disease x and giving up everything material in favor of the golden billion. the main super idea of ​​the globalist. traditional values ​​are opposed, russia has given organized political and military resistance to this doctrine, a visible alternative has appeared, klaus schwab, mopping their conduit, dolls of the heir tutti, today on the first, damn, yes, why are you disgracing yourself, housekeeping, tommy,

who is this? my groom, who? finn, who am i? i'll go there and wait. who am i? and you are a friend, a very close friend. what about the wedding? what wedding? i agreed stupidly. well, it happens, sorry. listen, i'm leaving for finland. i'll return the ring to you. one chance for three. premiere. watch the time after the program. i want to talk to him. and i won’t let you ruin his life again, well hello, oleshka, you are at the dacha and we are at the dacha, anything can happen at the dacha, a special edition of the program to live healthy, we will plant, sow, treat pain and generally understand the delights and problems of the dacha, tomorrow at the first,

it seems, we will have to say the word, if we perform here in st. petersburg without preparation, there will be no success, i defeated nikolaych, i changed russia forever, the union of salvation, the film premiere on russia day on the first, would you like to help your country, how, excuse me, you have something, what i need. comrade peredonov, our chief ussr sambo trainer. that means i’m knocking down, vasily oshchepkov is invited to replace him for a friendly match, now there is a more interesting frag and who, the germans, want to learn this, an effective technique against firearms does not yet exist, and comrade oshchepkov

showed, the army has made its choice to train the national team, it will be a frag, you lost more? without starting, with such an attitude you can’t win the battle, you want to kill my students, yes, if i write about him, they will put him in jail, where is he, they took him according to a denunciation, your denunciation, consider it mine, the legend of samba, premiere on friday at the first, we wish all the athletes good luck, may the best one win, one chance for three, leave him alone, it’s clear, we love each other, let’s mind your own business, oleg, i need you to go with me to finland, he claimed his rights to his son, why, this is your son, the premiere, watch the time after the program, and the end

of the program is... back to the conversation that we had in the previous part, about what, well, when you were somewhere, you had influence, and then you left there and want to return, based on the fact that you... have previous influence, you need to understand that life is changing, and the way you imagined, well , the structure of the world, it may no longer be so in the eyes of these people, but we when we say, there is the caribbean crisis, we remember those cubans there, these are the patriumte, patriolibertat and so on and so forth, they were like that, in many ways they remained like that, but of course they partly changed, because they had ninety years of experience second year when we said goodbye. "well, now we're like

we’ll come back, we’ll show everyone, yes, god willing , we’ll show you back, but life is a little more complicated, i was in uzbekistan for the weekend, which i’ve talked about many times, how well i really love this country, well, in general, somehow i became directly related to her, because i started serving there, and just for a completely non-work reason.” it was connected, so i once said on the air that it’s been 40 years since we took the oath, well, in general, we went with friends, so in many conversations, i have many acquaintances there with people who have a great attitude towards russia, who are very they want us to resume our closer cooperation and so on, they quite sincerely, in my opinion justified, told me the following: friends, well, it’s like this is such a world now that in order for someone to do something, you need to understand what will he get out of it? this is the idea, well, in other words, who can offer what? they offer investments, you offer friendship, as much money as they don’t have,

which means you need to offer something else, and i insist that this is an absolutely uncynical way of posing the question, you need to proceed from the fact that that the world works like this, the question of what we will become is the question of how much we will learn to offer something that people... will be interested in, and not talk about what you know, let’s talk about past friendship, brotherhood and so on, unfortunately, we must proceed from the fact that the world has become much more complicated, and we have accepted this world, we lived in this world for 30 years, you ran bases, and did a lot of other things, sometimes leaving is much easier, than to return, well, god willing, we will return, doll of the heir to tuti.