in general, i never thought about the fact that an impostor, he does not feel that he is an impostor, and about the fact that if you expect some kind of assessment or approval from someone, then you definitely won’t get it, just get used to the idea, that you will never get anything from these people, the main thing is that you will be in such a stupid position when you will put your whole life on the fact that - this conditional classmate sees this, someday faints, but she either doesn’t see it. or it won’t fall and you’ll just end up with the feeling that you’ve lived your life, for someone? you know, i remember, for example, myself in childhood, when i was at school, some students came to our teachers, there, well, who graduated from school 10 years ago, and these are some guys, yes, we are conditionally 12, and he is 22, he came back from the army in uniform, i’m conditionally visiting, i then dreamed of being a military man. a sailor and i, of course

, imagined that one day i would also come to my home school, which means in the uniform, of course, always a captain of the first rank, and how beautiful it would be in full dress uniform, with a dagger there with everyone affairs, life has turned out completely differently, firstly, i’m not a sailor, secondly, i can’t come to my school, thirdly, these teachers are no longer there, yes, but this is the feeling that i will definitely take my steps there along the school corridor when some guy comes in, it will be me, who do i say something to? “i won’t be in the class at this moment, there will be some other children sitting there who will look at me and say who this is, maybe, of course, they will somehow admire it, but it won’t do any good , that's when you suddenly realize that the goals that you set for yourself, they should simply be interesting to you, they should inspire you, and they should be truly yours, because they should realize your values, yes, for example, inspiration - this means that you know for the sake of why are you going to do this, well, for example, i would create

something that i don’t understand, whatever, that is, success is a bonus that no one will appreciate, no one needs it except us, that’s it, there, there, full stop, one day, many years ago , a girl came to me, whom i had known for a long time i knew, she came to me for a session, and i asked how you were doing, she says it’s bad, i say, listen, i saw you recently on a social network, yes, i say, you’re doing well there, she says: have you seen anyone

who is feeling bad there? that’s when it came to my consciousness, i suddenly realized that it’s true, this is such a czeslavia fair, where everyone shows that supposedly everything is fine, here in front of me sits a person for whom everything is bad, but on this social network he is everyone tells you how to build relationships, for example, there with men, let’s assume, and before that i had never thought about the fact that all these social networks are needed in order to speculate, this is also possible, well, this must be clearly understood, i am there with the help of... i sell social networks, then what i sell is one thing, i sell my services, another thing, i sell an idea, the fact that successful success is very important, well, that is, it’s such a mule bubble that is still somehow works, but in general the context is already clear, well, in general you need to understand that this is only a tool to achieve some goal , use it for its intended purpose, exclusively, and most importantly, you know, i often, for example, recommend it to people who come to me for training or work with the words that they want, for example, to earn money there.. 20 times more than they

earn now, great, then i ask accordingly, where are the people who earn as much as you want to earn, well , suppose this person says, well, they hang out there in expensive restaurants. , i speak, ok, go to a couple of these expensive restaurants, then you will come and tell me how you felt, uh-huh, yes, well , it happens in different ways, i myself also kind of did this once, then a person comes and says: listen, what i didn’t like it there, but what didn’t i like? well, i didn’t like it, because everything there, everyone is kind of pompous, everyone there is kind of dimensional, everyone there is kind of, i say, so it turns out that you don’t like the people you strive for, well, it turns out like this, so well, it seemed to you that they were pompous, but that means you don’t like them, but how do you turn out to be the same person, you already don’t like yourself in all this, and for me this is a very important mental material that needs to be worked with. because

a person must first accept that they will say exactly the same thing about him when he gets there, this work takes a lot of a person’s time, so when you look, for example, at the people who are there bigger, better, like -it's different, right? and some time ago i even wrote a video , i had some kind of content about when we want to be, it is now fashionable to say from point to point b, we do not have enough faith in point b for one simple reason: i am the one in whom i believe here,

now, today, here i am, sergei, there is such and such - yes, i don’t believe that i can be the way i will be there at this point b, i don’t believe in this money, i don’t believe in success, i don’t believe in myself. which may be there, and this is a very difficult job too, so if you are looking at someone, just to see how you will look with your eyes people who have never been there, yeah, this is important, you can track your reactions, yes, because it’s these reactions that will stop you, well, i think that they stop me to some extent, that well , it turns out that everything is going there over the heads, or as they once told me... that’s why i say that now there are diametrically different paths, i have in my head what to choose and what to choose, and such a split occurs, because once it hurt me very much, i was told that i felt like a man, and i felt this way

it was wildly unpleasant at that moment, right now i’m thinking about the fact that maybe it’s really there in big business and conditionally there that’s where i want to be. it ’s like this, that is, these are not women, in fact, they have more masculine energy than feminine, and then why do i want to go there, if i’m offended by the fact that they called me that, it feels like you don’t need to get there somewhere there, on the contrary, return and figure out who you really are, and what this race is for, for what prize, yeah. and to whom you bring this prize, you take it to your grandmother, who won’t appreciate it, keep it with you, you’ll be fine with it, that’s the answer , well, i guess it’s the other way around, now after talking with you, i have the feeling that now i’m there after 8

years in business, on the contrary, i want to be a mother, for some reason i want to be that mother who takes care of her children, well... at the same time, i can’t say that this can greatly harm some kind of implementation, but maybe to make it easier, to somehow reset some internal ballast, which greatly interferes with movement, well, it turns out, that everything happens through some kind of constant resistance, you also have to understand that your children need you as a mother until they are 12 years old, so i understand this moment, that now my son is seven, my daughter is five, well, even now . he’ll tell me, mom, close the door, come out, and this moment really really scares me - not that it scares me, but i actually think about the fact that i have very little time left, in fact, that is, i had 7 years that i haven’t used, now, well, i used it, but not as

effectively as i would like, as if yes, but it’s important that there’s also a trap here so that you don’t knock on their door when they tell you this, they didn’t say, i ’ve put so many years on you here, yes, i gave it to you, this... what’s wrong with my eldest son it seems that i missed out on some kind of pleasure, probably motherhood, because i didn’t really enjoy it, honestly, i think why, why, well, i was 22 years old, and i’m kind of like a child here in business, all this

somehow at the same time, in the end now i want a third one in order to enjoy it, with each subsequent child there will of course be more pleasure, that’s for sure, but still, you know, even this needs to be done, as tatyana rightly said, you need to do it for yourself in this sense, and then you will find a balance, then there really will be a balance, i know successful ones. come, this will be very valuable, i thank you very much for today’s meeting, for

the conversation, and there are a lot of, let’s say, a fashionable word, insights that you really want to directly note yourself somewhere in a prominent place, so as not to forget, but you it’s very important to look at this algorithm for yourself, write it down directly, yes, thank you, i think it was an interesting conversation, you looked at it. you can fill out a form on the website of the first channel 1tv.ru.

hello, this is the popular science podcast schrödinger’s cat and i am its host grigory tarasevich, editor-in-chief of the magazine, which is also called schrödinger’s cat. and we talk. today about pushkin, our guests today are two doctors of philological sciences: maria valerievna ivanova, dean of the scientific faculty of the gorky literary institute, and alexander viktorovich markov, professor at the russian state university of humanities, also a doctor of philology, i have a simple everyday question, is it comfortable for you to sit, comfortable? yes, quite, thank you, the chair is comfortable and so on, but this question was, of course, dictated by sincere concern for your comfort, but... also by talking about pushkin and his language, because, if i understand correctly, the word comfort was in the early 19th century centuries,

few would have understood, i understand correctly, that this word was then foreign, rare and somehow incomprehensible, yes, because, of course, in french there is the word confort, but it very rare in comparison with other french words for convenience, ease, so the word comfort was clearly perceived as english, as an anglicism, not belonging... a pipe in every hut, glass replaced a stretched bubble, in general more frequency, convenience of what the english call comfort, this is pushkin, travels from moscow to st. petersburg, when i re-read about this work, it seemed absolutely amazing to me how similar the language is to the one we speak now, if you pull up quotes, you can insert it into the block to say that i... wrote in 2024, but i want to draw attention to this word comfort, that is, pushkin

does not hesitate to introduce into the russian language, english, french, well, i think, with latin sources of the word, how typical was it for pushkin to use borrowings from other languages, it is typical, moreover, in an era when many writers abandoned non-language vocabulary, when sumarokov wrote articles about the extermination of other people's words,

poetry, that is, poetry got rid of grandiloquence and accommodated our everyday thoughts, that is, approximately the way we think, hence pushkin’s craving for englishisms, he...

the word comfort becomes a characteristic of the bourgeois way of life, therefore, of course, pushkin was very sensitive to modernity, very sensitive to the development of capitalism, to the comforts that are usually provided in museums display goose feathers, which pushkin was supposed to write with, but pushkin, of course , also wrote with goose feathers, but if he had the opportunity to purchase silver feathers, he

bought silver feathers, that is, now he would work on the most expensive laptop, because that he was, but not to his role as a legislator of language, no one blamed him for not having a rich enough stylistic palette or that certain borrowings were not justified, but early pushkin had to pay a lot for his vernacular, as they scolded him ruslana and lyudmila, for both colloquial words, for the combination of incompatible

styles of high and low, for the destruction of the entire previous system. nevertheless, here he establishes his norm as a reformer of the possible use of borrowing, if this is a good word, it necessary for the author, but let us note, by the way, that the word snapshot, that is, copy, is a very technical word, it is an engineering word of that time and it also looked like barbarism, no less than any anglicisms or golicisms in

the russian text, that is, here for us the word filming is customary to mean photography, then of course it meant, for example, engineering...

of the russian literary language, and it speaks of the spirit of the russian people, who are very crafty, cunning and inherent...

poetry of the troubadours, poetic novels are required medieval and says that romantic poetry, the only thing that was missing were dictionaries and grammars, that is , some ordering, that it was necessary to order not only the ancient tradition, but this barbaric foreign tradition, that is, here pushkin, of course, ironizing over in fact, it does not serve as an academic dictionary built on the classicist model, a pure and correct language. for the anarchy of tribal words, which can be taken from anywhere and in any way, on the contrary, for a certain order, so that just compile a dictionary for half a coupon of a tailcoat and a vest, compile a dictionary of anglicisms, a dictionary

of galicianisms, a dictionary of italianisms, and simply create additional canons alternative to the ancient one, it’s not at all easy to use all the first foreign words that come to mind, listen, well, if pushkin had lived in our time, let’s assume such a thought experiment, i understand how you... philological sciences, such an experiment would probably not be taken very seriously, but suppose pushkin lives in 24, he would used his poetry, for example, the words like, podcast, this is where we are sitting now, of course, i think that he would have been a hooligan and would have used all these words. pushkin has a very interesting paradox here: for him, turning to nonlingual contexts is not borrowing words, but to some extent borrowing a language. i'll remember one note. short, but very key for our topic, this is pushkin’s note about the translation carried out by prince vyazimsky, his friend, he translated a novel by benjamin

castan from french, adolf, in fact, is one of these the first novels about a demonic man, to some extent the prototype of anegin, pechorin of all demonic personalities that we know, and of course pushkin welcomed this translation, because as a result onegin has a french brother. and says that vyazimsky’s main merit is that he was able to cope with the difficulty of metaphysical language. but what is metaphysical language? this is a very interesting thing, why? because pushkin, vyazimsky, and many of his contemporaries read french, they did not need translate constant's novel, i read it in french, it was written quite simply, but there was something else that was missing in the russian language , this way of looking at a scoundrel with a distance, not getting emotionally involved, but... he's like this, oh he's like that , but to describe as they describe from what, as if from another planet, to describe in a seemingly neutral language, but behind which there is truly merciless

analytics, pushkin said that prince vyazimsky coped with this task, with this main task of creating not too much emotional language, because the russian language is very emotional, if you praise it, it’s without measure, if you scold it, then it’s also in the last words, that’s when the frenchman says in seemingly neutral words... without asking at all whether he wants to eat or not, premiere, mikhail zadornov, on

the first day of russia, an endoscopic examination of the nasal cavity takes place in our program, we see everything on the screen, this is the most modern ent method of examining a patient, and of course, we will tell you a lot of important, interesting things, because the program to live healthy, educates and ... helps on thursday on the first, this is the schrödinger's cat podcast, i am its host, the editor-in-chief of the schrödinger's cat magazine grigory tarasevich, and we talk about pushkin from the point of view of language, how alexander sergeevich will influence the russian language. pushkin was reproached for mixing different styles, well lumanosov taught to eat high, medium, low calm. there are reinforced concrete boundaries between them, god forbid someone breaks them, well, not so reinforced concrete, and most importantly, lomanosov’s concept, which he outlined in the preface about pose...

the slavic lexical fund, is not church slavonicisms are those words that are in the church slavonic language, in russian, that is, hand, foot, god, glory, and so on, the second style, calm, like average, mediocre, as lomonosov wrote, this is actually churchly -slavicisms, but not too outdated, and the third is a low style, but a literary form of language use, this is

actually russian vocabulary, that is, it has already arisen in the russian language itself, and then it distributes these lexical layers into genres. and it must be said that among the genres that lomanosov indicates, there is no, say, well, neither a novel, nor a story, in principle there are no prose genres there, there are only friendly letters in prose, descriptions of ordinary affairs, and of course, pushkin is the creator of russian realistic prose.

in fact, in the french dispute between the ancient and the new, it was the new ones, such as charles perrault, who was the leader of the new ones, who argued that in antiquity there were no, for example, fairy tales, so i’m composing a fairy tale about the sleeping beauty, so i’m creating a certain genre that does not fit into this system of three styles, but let it exist, in general, pushkin he completely repeated the experience of charles perot; in fact, when he created ruslan and lyudmila, he did not protest against classicism. he greatly respected lomanosov in the already quoted journey from moscow to st. petersburg, he defends lomanosov from radishchi, but another thing is that he acted as a new classicist, at least in his early period. well, here are ruslan and lyudmila, be quiet, empty head, i have heard the truth sometimes, even though the fishing is wide, but my brain is not enough, i go, go, i don’t shine, but when i get enough, i don’t let go,

it’s rude, no. colloquialism is not even low style, because lomonosov’s low style is a literary low style, and this just doesn’t fit into one of these three styles, it’s just an imitation of popular vernacular, that’s what it is.

speeches of educated nobles or nobles or courtiers, when he carried out the reform of the russian literary language, he turned to the language of the russian people, then chernyshevsky will say that the discussion or war or dispute between shishkov and koromzin is a storm in a teacup, because one was for the old days, for church slavonic with shishkov, yes, there was a second one. for the newness, a new syllable, of course, the brilliant nikolai mikhailovich koramzin, he created a new syllable, he greatly simplified the russian language, he greatly enriched the vocabulary, etc., etc., but they did not see the main national source, who just saw pushkin, to

whom he turned , native sources, a living, popular language, which became the basis of a new literary language, maybe i’m wrong, but pushkin still rather focused not... on the language of the serf peasant, but how he expressed himself on the language spoken educated people, or i’m mistaken, or just went to the people like, but with pushkin and practically sometimes went to the people, at least when he lived in mikhailovskoye, he studied the people’s language carefully, because for him the task was not only to write in the language, but to some extent construct a language, to some extent create those models that subsequent authors will follow, that is, how to write: a fairy tale, how to write a novel in verse, how to write something, this completely, in fact , fit into the then literary request, and it is characteristic, for example, that pushkin’s teacher at the lyceum kashansky, who taught rhetoric,

seemed to be a classicist, but he welcomed all the works of pushkin, and ruslan and lyudmila, and eugene onegin, in subsequent editions of his rhetoric included these works in the canon of rhetoric, that is ... imagine, he teaches classicist rhetoric, includes examples from evgeny negin, ruslan and lyudmila, prisoner of the caucasus and everything else, so he loved his student, because pushkin creates examples, this is what a romantic poem should look like, this is what a novel about a modern man should look like, look, creating models is rather a somewhat classicist task, well, look, the expression is not enough for the brain, it’s still not a peasant expression, i’m not sure that the word “brain” at all existed in the vocabulary of a peasant, this... well , i don’t know, it’s not too rude, but the brain is not enough, imagine that in an essay a schoolboy writes, but these people have little brain, well

, it’s normal, this is swearing, this is swearing, most likely not swearing is a tradition, you know, in lavrentsevo chronicle, a note from the scribe, he asks him not to scold him, not to reproach him, if somewhere... he didn’t finish, described, or made a mistake, the mind of a hammer, the book is a rag, he didn’t get to it, this is from the same series, well, after all, to i thought of a very modern expression that could be completely, so pushkin’s language, it is modern, the thing is that we still live in pushkin’s language, in pushkin’s style in pushkin’s norm. pushkin created, unlike everyone else who wanted to create a literary language and a norm of literary language, because the literary language is precisely... different in norm from all other variants of the use of language, by creating the norm, he made it expanded, that is, if everyone in his time and earlier made norms prohibitive, trying to create

a literary language, one or the other is impossible new or old is not allowed and vernacular is not allowed or the servant of business clerical is not allowed, then pushkin allows everything, he has it... journalism, you said that we live the pushkin norm, well look, pushkin is a free borrowing of words from different languages, this is the inclusion of oral speech, or rather elements of oral speech in written speech, and oral speech from different levels, this is irony over everything, over friends, over power, over officials, over generals, over admirals, like shashkov, if we take a high school student, even a humanities student. or a junior student shrufak, this

will be an anti-pushkin norm, you need to write in written, high language. we won’t write something rude, like, when will the devil take you, like in evgeniy anegeni. we will express negative emotions about bad things. uncle's fortune. in a school essay, the liberties that pushkin allowed himself would have been completely unacceptable. well, pushkin has artistic speech, in artistic speech anything is possible. and in the essay. we have a multifunctional stylistic system of the literary language, we have styles, in styles there is no such concept in stylistics as right or wrong, there is a concept of appropriate or inappropriate, precisely because one is appropriate in one style, and the other is appropriate in another style, this is here the division of literary language into style allows school essay, write in the same style, contact...

our famous bibliographer abram elich reid bluth, how pushkin came out in genius, where he explains what pushkin’s main strategy was, this strategy can be designated as regular production, in contrast to the previous production or court, or commercial, but uncalled for, that is, books for the people, or amateurish, something that was practiced by aristocrats who either write or don’t write for years, pushkin was the first to declare that virtually every year he would publish poem. each poem is quite exotic, it is obviously sensational, but

imagine, a stream from a gypsy tavern or a stream from how robbers lead, walk under escort and escape, or a stream from caucasian captivity, that is, this is what will now collect millions views, and pushkin essentially creates this new standard of the poem, that is, a poem that essentially turns out to be a tv report or a window into a completely exotic life.

organism, and then you will move on to some legal concepts and philosophical concepts ethics, the teacher will tell you these concepts, already for the fifth time your text will be constructed correctly, and indeed you will not say that raskolnikov is so bad there, but let’s assume that from the very beginning

, so to speak, raskolnikov was based on contradictory premises, there the problem of writing is not in that they are written in literary language, in that they are written specifically. slang language, which combines journalistic phrases, phrases from a textbook, officialdom, and so on, the literary language should still be like times more monolithic, for example, the language of a lawyer is an exemplary literary language, but if you talk about raskolnikov in the language of a lawyer or prosecutor, which porfiry petrovich speaks of raskolnikov, this is, in general, a literary language, well, look, pushkin quite calmly jumps out of language there turning to antiquity to the language.

cool thing, and often this complex official style makes it difficult to understand, and by the way, there is a very good book by afanasy selishchy from 1928, the language of the revolutionary era, where he writes exactly how the soviet language arose clerk, he attributes this to the fact that a huge number of people who had not previously created any texts entered the elite, that is, they became soviet managers, journalists, heads of collective farms, enterprises, trusts, and accordingly...