well, how cool.

and that you are starting to communicate normally, i just fed you, my mother always told me that people can only be good when they need something from you, and that you need to look at people very carefully, and i look at you very carefully i’m taking a closer look, well, tell your mom that you shouldn’t judge other people by yourself, i’ll tell you, so tell me, tell me, and tell me that not everyone is like her, well, she’s known that for a long time, my mom is the best, well, of course, you don’t think that because of the mushrooms and the fire i’ll suddenly consider you my father, where there, maximum biological material, quiet, so, dear friends, the best drinks for the heat, we are preparing a special type of iced coffee with

orange, why? about this about much more in the program: great, great, tomorrow on the first, in memory of anastasia zavorotnyuk. we remember a wonderful person, an amazing woman, a colleague, a friend, anastasiak, born in her seventy-first year, she did not feel very well.

didn’t pour out anywhere, i wanted to come up and say, this can’t be, get up, when - the next morning creepy, monstrous, blatant publications about a lot of makeup, i wanted to make a face at something that didn’t exist at all, a person can live after death only in art, only it can defeat death, on saturday, on the first, the most famous graduate of our childhood home...

life to every man, i did it. in memory of yuri shatunov, on sunday on the first. beauty, what a misha you are. it’s all the same, you’re more beautiful. here you go, bear. i ’ll never get along with eermakov again, understand? hands. mish, you are so touchy. we'll get married anyway. i won’t go for nazar, i want the bear lyub. varka, make up your mind, you need to start a new life, i ’ll get a job at a factory, we’ll rent a room somewhere for you too, the rapids are ahead, mom, misha, where, they didn’t find him var, father said, you’re on the rapids, you crashed, hold her, jump, i said , otherwise i’ll shoot now, i don’t care that he killed, father, you somehow ended up on the shore, you me... two shores, the premiere

of a multi-part film on june 24, on the first, you’re crazy, don’t touch me, i won’t sleep with you, i’d rather not live at all, i’m a nakerton.

if they recognized you, then 100% have already called the police, i can’t go without my husband and son, you say so, then we’ll wind down, we don’t need problems with the police, wait. that’s it, it’s time, we’ll be late, do you hear, let’s go , what are you doing, i see, you feel bad, or something, yes,

your head hurts, where, where, where, you ’re hot, vit, vit, do you hear me, vit? oh my, vitya, vitka, now he’s gone, now, i feel bad, but what are you saying? you, you, talk to me, okay, you, talk, my head hurts, but i feel bad, dad,

be patient, san. now it’s neat, we’ve already arrived, now it’s stubble, come here, just like that.

"i've been sitting here for an hour, no one has done anything to me. he says, does anyone here speak russian at all, i can’t let you in there, the doctor will come out soon, he will explain everything to you, excuse me, 90, prednisone bolusna and drop a liter of crystalloids, what ’s the name of that russian nurse, marina, she is on duty today, yes, can you call her down to the emergency room? "hello, hello,

my name is marina, i will translate for you, we need to ask you a few questions, yes, what’s wrong with him, you are the father, yes, miss, where were you when the boy became ill, and what difference does it make where we are were, you can..." tell what happened to him, to understand this, you need to find out what you ate, mushrooms, yes, but they are non-poisonous, i'm sure, i'm a mushroom picker, mushrooms, what do you mean, why your son in a dress, and what kind of question are we playing with him, you know, this is our game, sana, this is...

normal, sorry, it’s clear, he doesn’t have any documents, take him to the boy’s room and tell him, what’s wrong with him, your son was poisoned by mushrooms, but you brought him on time, we washed out his stomach, now he’s on a drip, let’s go, let’s go, venla, security was called, yes, yes, of course, great, hi,

when will we be discharged? no, i don’t solve such questions. well, how long are they, do you usually have such patients? in your case, a week of hospitalization. we don’t have a week and...

well, if you don’t let go of your hand now, i’ll scream, well, help, you’re russian, i’m not russian, i’m finnish, and if you don’t let go, i ’ll scratch your face, i understand, what are you doing, let me at least finish the infusion, it will drip for half an hour, the rest doesn’t concern me.

we arrived an hour ago, a boy on a drip, a russian-speaking man, russian, i it seemed suspicious that it was a boy. the cadet is like a girl.

a big game is on the air; today russian president vladimir putin arrived in korea.

specifically, we are talking about three points: the first is concern about the fate of the zaporozhye nuclear power plant and the desire for it to be under ukrainian jurisdiction, and today it is located on the territory that we control, while a categorical judgment on the topic of nuclear war and nuclear rhetoric, i will be obliged to then

come back to it because the ink wasn't dry until the day after they voted for it.

the swing was big, but the result was no. there was another, apparently, hidden, side goal - to demonstrate zelensky, who ceased to be president on may 21, and the fact that they communicate and talk with him, as if to certify that the countries gathered still continue to consider him the legitimate leader ukraine. no one, of course, signed any declarations on this matter, they can always refuse this, but this is how they will... show, this is how they will present, they are already presenting in media, that’s all, that’s all, but there were a lot of very funny ones, to say the least.

restore its defense capability, the ability to resist it, and so on. they hastened to do this so as not to look, in general, in the eyes of civilized europe, the european union, as some kind of outsiders, after their resignation. next, let’s say, an episode that happened everywhere, with how the ukrainian media interpreted what happened. the christian version is with a speech by prime minister milo.

what they discussed after putin spoke, they, firstly, were forced to react to it, and secondly, everyone who wanted all this to be taken seriously

was forced to make a reservation that, of course, without russia we if we can’t make peace, next time we will, of course, invite her. i would like to say here that we are not in any queue for such conferences, it’s great, not entirely great, from my point of view, this is that several countries... about this, but their logic was something like this: if only a child would not be amused, if only he would not cry, they put pressure on us to take part in this, we have much

more serious issues when we need to show our position, but in the end, here is that document, nothing not worthwhile, which is offered to us, well, let us sign it, of course there is still room for manipulation to say, well, that’s all, including hungary, slovakia, and turkey. and serbia signed everything, but in fact, in fact, it seems to me that these countries are in this way they are maneuvering, with the exception of serbia they are all members of the same nato, and they are forced, of course, they are obliged to simply take this into account, they thus, well, as they say, got off with little blood, it seems to me that this is the meaning of their behavior , definitely on a different level.

and the chicken also wants to live, in this case, i’m mainly talking about serbia, which is really in a difficult situation and wants to understandably sit on two chairs, on the other hand, it seems to me that every cloud has a silver lining, and for me this is useful, but if do you want a reminder, not only, not only, who is ready to take a special position different from the united states, but which of the countries with which... russia is trying to build friendly relations, that these relations have their limitations, what do you think about this aleksandrovi, well, i think it really is.

in another situation, i think, the turks, and the hungarians, especially the serbs, and slovakia, they can turn out to be very decisive in our favor, just like the saudis and the indians, and yet, of course, russia will once again time, well, you can’t help but notice that our position depends only on our own, our own strength, our power, being friends with the strong, unconditionally following those who have...

unconditional superiority and advantage, and i think that we need to understand that in order to to truly take our rightful place on the world stage, in which our country, our people, our state, our history fully provide and guarantee us, we still need to make efforts, the stronger we are inside, the more consistently convincing we will move towards our victory, the more i think people will look at china, look, china has done. the stakes of friendship, does not bend under the pressure of the global west, and acts correctly, russia wins, russia becomes strong, relations, strong relations with china with our real allies are strengthened, and this will be rewarded, but if we are strong, it seems to me , now there is no need to go into these little details, here konstantin zatulin is right, this is not such a fundamental document to make from

him... we highly appreciate the dprk's strong support for the russian special military operation in ukraine. solidarity with us on key international issues. willingness to defend common priorities and views at the united nations. and further. pyongyang remains our staunch like-minded person and supporter, ready to resolutely resist the extermination of the collective west, to prevent the formation of a multipolar world order based on justice, mutual respect

for sovereignty, and accounting. each other's interests. the united states of america is trying its best to impose on the world a so-called rules-based order, which in essence is nothing more than a global neo-colonial dictatorship based on double standards, countries that do not agree with this approach and pursue independent policies are faced with with increasingly severe external pressure. the us leadership views such a natural, legitimate desire for independence and autonomy as a threat to its dominance in the world. the united states, and north korea is ready support russia in what it

is for russia now. secondly, despite all these horrors that are told about north korea, that there is a poor country there, that people wander around there at all, there are no cars, everyone rides bicycles, dresses in the same suit and they are given a cup of rice per day, all this is not true, north korea, north korea has not been the same for a long time, north korea, moreover, in technological terms, the fact

that... north korea managed, but not without help, but with the use of some seroschemes, but managed to acquire nuclear potential, not only nuclear. but also missiles on their own, yes, not to mention the fact that they were manufactured a long time ago, at one time the soviet union built certain facilities for the production of certain types of weapons and ammunition, but they managed to, so to speak, develop, modernize, and today they, in principle , produce the entire range, including artillery shells, which... uh, well, not 155 mm, of course, not to the west, but 152 mm, for example, they produce mines, which, so to speak, is suitable for all our modern systems, that is , military-technical cooperation is more likely

to have practical benefits for us, i generally believe that yes, uh, at one time, well, in the nineties, at the beginning of 2000, we - played along with the americans, agreed to all these sanctions that they imposed against north korea, but times have changed, an absolutely unlimited number of sanctions have been introduced against us, there are 18 or 20, i don’t remember how many thousands of these sanctions, but we we continue, so to speak, to remain in the mode, in the sanctions regime against north korea, well, there are several ways, of course, you can simply not comply with them. or maybe, i don’t think so, by the way, the americans used it, i don’t remember for what reason, but they once said that this decision, so to speak, does not apply to us, we, so to speak, are not

blocking this decision, but we will not comply with it, so we can leave the sanctions regime, especially if it concerns non -nuclear weapons, for example, korean workers, we have always had korean workers in the far east. i still can’t help but say what konstantin fetovich touched on regarding nuclear weapons, that stoltenberg is just saying so, but the russian president at the st. petersburg forum seemed to draw the line that there will be no demonstration,

prophylactic, preemptive strikes , do not mention nuclear weapons in the sui, that is, if necessary, we will use it, but all decisions have been made, there is political will, here is stoltenberg, you understand, here is his statement itself, konstantin fedovich very competently said, a ghost, so to speak, of an increased degree readiness of nuclear forces, but the table is not what you said, he said bringing nuclear weapons to an increased level, that’s how you can, this makes no sense at all, as if it were ammunition, it doesn’t make a weapon, it doesn’t make a difference between ammunition, it probably doesn’t , in general, it seems to me that he doesn’t even know a little about what he’s talking about. moreover, nato, although they proclaim themselves a nuclear union, in fact nato does not have its own nuclear weapons as an organization. the americans, the french and the british control nuclear weapons. french people, by the way, despite the fact that they have, well

, a pretty decent nuclear potential, it is not an integral part of the nuclear potential. we are only talking about these 150 gravity bombs that are under. control of the americans, that is, there is deployed and not deployed, these are the concepts we use when we talk about nuclear weapons, so i want to ask you, vitaly vyacheslavovich naumkin, what is happening in another, well, i would say, not even an explosive region , and there an explosion is already happening, of course i’m talking about the middle east and gas, it would be especially interesting to hear your opinion. about a new turn in the american approach to this conflict, suddenly, after all the statements by biden and his advisers that israel is behaving inappropriately, does not comply with humanitarian norms, ignores

un security council resolutions, suddenly an unprecedented, huge package of american military assistance to israel, and how i i understand, without any conditions of restrictions, that... the address of the israeli leadership, which has never called this policy complete , so to speak, with such a vague cloud of criticism in 100% support for israel, including military support, and these are some attempts to wag a finger.

iraq and jordan, and it is quite obvious that the middle east is needed, and even states are needed that do not seem to be in the position of supporting the united states, but are trying to wave this bait.

this split between this group

of right-wingers, i believe that netanyahu himself can be considered a supporter of these ultra-radical, far-right thoughts, which he clearly shares with these two who filled askomin, here are ministers, on the other hand, people who were in the military cabinet, and not members of the government, these are former chiefs of the general staff and...

it’s not for nothing that he says that i don’t want hamastan in gas, it would change fathastan. that is, for the fatah movement, the palestinian authority to govern gaza, well, who will govern it, then this is the israeli occupation, so i think that this split that we have today...

it may be unfair to consider that there is such this is the byzantine style when you speak one thing, you do another, at the same time you take mutually contradictory steps, and so on and so on, in any case , they demonize the image of the eastern roman empire, its opponents, who still exist in historiography, but as regards israel specifically, in which does it manifest?

new people came and so on. netanyahu manipulated the united states more than once or twice during this conflict and before. and this, of course, creates problems, problems for the top of the democratic party, for joe biden himself. therefore, we provide assistance, but at the same time, we intrigue against the one who

receives this help. if i can say a few words about the fact that there is no need to downplay this criticism of israel, because there are enough people. the united states, which categorically does not like him, as one american political scientist recently wrote, he wrote that if you asked netanyahu who he would prefer to get rid of smotrich, this is the far-right minister, or the leader of hamas, he would prefer to get rid of smotrich, and not from the leader of hamas. you know, the most criticism of israel i've seen is heard in israel itself, well, yes, because. at least many people had the feeling until recently that if you are not just a jew, but an israeli, you can disagree with israeli policies without being accused of anti-semitism, i must say that israel has already reached the point where they they calmly accuse each other

of anti-semitism, they have become less tolerant in israel, but no, i would not say, i would say that - just passports, these four released ones, where is one of them, some goats - this is ours, our compatriot, who has both an israeli and a russian passport, well, god bless him, i have nothing against it, but we must not forget that in order to free this small group of people, the israelis during the operation,

when special forces were hiding there in a truck with humanitarian aid, they provided 274 palestinians, we are leaving for advertising, we will return to literally in a few minutes, i would like to see our life reflected in literature with maximum truthfulness. bekov writes that how lieutenant ivanovsky died, in ultimately played a huge role in the victory over nazi germany, because there were millions of such unknown soldiers. literature is a selective art; i may read it, or i may not know about the existence of this book.

people on the centenary of the birth of vasil bykov, the prime minister, today at the first, a doctor at one of the northern hospitals drew attention to a suspicious man: try to guess who it is? hurry up, otherwise ilmari from the cavalry is already leaving for the hospital, it’s great, with you, yes, and that you even you can’t assign security to me, why should you run away? nowhere but to the finnish prison, one chance for three, premiere, tomorrow after

the program time, the bay in this place is only 70 km, but it’s at most 5 hours on a boat, now i realize, tan, why are you, i’m not on the list, it seems there will never be, listen, you will not be in my turn to sew, well, if i get a job for... your eyes, the people behind this door sew haute couture and work with imports, it’s disgusting, it’s not about the suit, it’s about you, when you they took us into the section and warned us that we have special clients here and that the attitude towards it should also be special. kanyusha, do not refuse the courtesy of having dinner with me, i came here to work, not to wag my tail. what are you doing?

but i love it, it seems different, there’s a big game on the air, general, i hear and read a lot about western, especially american military assistance to ukraine, in general there is a universal reaction among russian experts... that there seems to be a lot of help, but it’s nothing fundamental on the battlefield in does not

change the fate of military operations, and to a certain extent i agree with this, because a country like russia, a great nuclear power, a country that has demonstrated the capabilities of its economy with a leader who has a combination of restraint and will of steel, no, if by fundamental result we mean that ukraine will not have a victory, but russia will have a victory, with that i agree 100% well, there are some things that are significant, even if they are not fundamental, for example, prolongation of the conflict, for example, president putin himself said that if the united states wants to stop this war,

it will not bring him victory, will not bring him glory, well, this is a very serious threat to russia, excuse the expression, we will not forget and will not forgive, where am i wrong? no, you are right, but you see, i have such a very firm conviction that the united states is their allies, the same goes for the europeans, for some reason they can’t get rid of it. from the thought that how can it be, here is a country with a gdp

equal, as they say, to italian, the west outnumbers them. many at the beginning of the conflict, many political scientists, even military ones, said that defeating a nuclear power is what they want it is impossible to defeat it, in principle, but nevertheless, they are waging this war of attrition, believing that sooner or later we will surrender anyway, we do not have enough resources, so they act this way so that china does not help us, hence it all these tales about

washing machine chips made from irons and whatever else is possible.

now you understand what you are looking at, general, what you are saying, it is impossible not to agree with you, a decisive contribution, not a decisive one, well, not a decisive one, you understand, so i want to continue, now to my favorite topic all, so to speak, experts, commentators, journalists, these are the same f-16s, now mirages have already appeared, for me, the

longer this lasts, the more mysteries there are. the americans do not supply their equipment, they do not supply their allies with their equipment, which is intended for the american armed forces, because before they have export options, an option for themselves, in order to supply ukraine with its aircraft from warehouses, they have to do a lot of work there, that's more than removing uranium armor from tanks, so

the main problem for the pilots, and the pilots, is... what kind of lack of knowledge of the english language, i’m not even talking about the technicians, but these young ukrainian guys just can’t learn english, now we’re talking about a mirage, about mirages, and then everything is in french, and uh, so to speak, all the documentation is in french, all these plates on airplanes are all in french, which means you need to learn french, and this too, this is also in dutch , and you also know everything, here everything you say is the absolute truth. well, i ’ll finish, dmitry, here’s what, what, what needs to be done, in order to bring them to their senses a little, we need to go for a certain escalation, there were two raids on crimea, 12 missiles each, and so ms, there our 31st division did a good job, intercepted everything, but they were hanging on the black sea,

an american high-altitude drone, a french one. french reconnaissance avax british arcee 135 reconnaissance aircraft, so i would start with the french, you just need to land in... structures, let’s see, then the british are next in line, and then we can move on to the americans, i’m sure that because of this there won’t be a third world war, we’ve already

splashed down one american drone, but it’s true through maneuvers of our plane there , but nevertheless they grumbled, they grumbled, they washed themselves, after that, so to speak, they began to use drones that fly there at 1800 to 18 km, although in our country...

that is, they don’t just act, as if spontaneously, on a whim, let’s let's supply these types of weapons, give us these missiles, these airplanes, but they have a general idea

of ​​how to enter into this controlled escalation, what limits to reach and how to get out of it if necessary, when we land someone and do something else drastic, how to get out of it, that’s all . these are not some individual considerations of american generals, this is science, this is a system, they are just like the system of network wars, they have developed many strategies, sometimes it seems to me that the war with the war that we are playing is a little behind the one in which we, or rather we are in, in which we are participating, it lags a little behind the war that is being waged against us, that is, when we respond to this controlled escalation. spontaneous decisions, practical reactions, sometimes right, sometimes wrong, we go through trial and error, probably differently, in some circumstances, during war it does not happen differently, but we are dealing with a systemic

phenomenon, controlled escalation.