it’s tormenting, it’s been tormenting for the second day, i thought i ate something, that it was her, that she’s feeling sick, a common thing, you ate onions in the morning, why shouldn’t i eat onions now or something, she’s heavy, what a blessing, son.

well, what are we going to do, wife, you’re wearing a bear’s bastard, but do whatever you want, you can kill him, you can drive him away, it’s such a shame, for the whole village, who to tell that he never slept with his wife . and if i send you away, will you go to mishka? i don’t know, he brought another one, you won’t believe that they won’t believe him. let's go to the house,

don't say anything to your parents, they won't understand, let him think that it's mine, you'll regret it, nazar, i'm carrying myself take it, maybe i’ll regret it, we’ll see, but for now we have no choice. there's a big game on the air. yesterday russia suffered two terrorist attacks: one was a terrorist attack on crimea, which was allegedly carried out by ukraine. of course,

by the united states using american weapons and american intelligence information. the second terrorist attack took place in dagestan, which, unfortunately, was also quite bloody, and allegedly, at the moment, our ill-wishers in the west and in washington, some think tanks. have already established that this is all the work of islamic extremists, but there is, of course, an involuntary suspicion that the united states could also have a hand in this, under all conditions, these are two serious, very, i would say, vile attacks, with heavy losses in primarily among civilians. and although

appropriate measures were taken, in general , more or less normal life was restored in sevastopol, in dagestan, nevertheless, of course, this is a serious warning to russia about the kind of world we live in, with what enemies we face, what threats we must be prepared to deal with, general buzhinsky, your opinion, you know, well... that these are terrorist attacks, there is no doubt, well, i’ll start with sevastopol, because sevastopol is , well, we very often say that the americans are there, and not only the americans , allowed ukraine to strike, well, i think it’s time to get rid of these illusions, because all these strikes and missiles, attacks with american ones, and stormshadow and scalps are all. ..they are applied by specialists who,

so to speak, they represent countries and suppliers; moreover, they are based on american intelligence data, mainly satellite intelligence. guidance is carried out either by an american drone, which was hovering there global hock, or by english or french reconnaissance aircraft, which also regularly hover over the black sea, so they allow themselves, no, so to speak, they did not allow ukraine there, only 100 km , all of these are, of course, fairy tales for the uninitiated public; as for dagestan, well, here of course we are we can assume that...

i never said that the father is not responsible for his son, among the militants who were liquidated are two sons of this local leader, one nephew, and as far as i know, he has already been detained, interrogations are being carried out, searches are being carried out and so on , of course, it is difficult

to imagine that all this preparation took place completely underground, so much so that the closest people could not even... under the pretext of the arrival of a plane from israel, searching for zionists there, then they reacted to this, but at the same time there were voices about , that it is impossible to overestimate what happened at all, you need to understand that this is such a spontaneous expression of feelings against the background of what is happening

in the middle east, at least what happened in dagestan now is an attempt to transfer the disputes of someone else’s conflict to russian soil, because the attacks. .. was subjected to the synagogue and the orthodox church, well, the synagogue, because those who attacked, as i understand it, wanted to emphasize their hostility towards the jews, but the orthodox church is already direct...

or in schools, in kindergartens, in educational institutions, against youth, against children, they must know that they who take the lives of others should also be deprived of life, all the objections about what this to say, that does not suit us according to the constitution for som, in my opinion, are simply a reflection of the former an approach that was formed in completely different conditions and which, in fact , does not even stand up to comparison with our constitution, because our constitution... says that in exceptional cases, in the presence of a jury trial, it is permissible to use

an exceptional penalty, death, we just put a moratorium on it, including because at one time we went to the council of europe, but now we have left it, so we need to do this, people who allow this should know that they, uh, are death they will be overtaken if they cause death to others. well, first of all, i completely agree with you, and it seems to me that you said two important things that are closely interrelated: first, that you need to be prepared to use the death penalty, but second, that this should be associated with clear procedures, such as a jury trial, maybe some also not for any reason, not for any reason, no, when i speak, i am commenting on what you said about the execution of the death penalty, that it requires special procedures, that is , not like under khruchov, when... the currency traders were taken retroactively, then convicted, shot, this is absolutely, people did not deprive anyone of their life, they could not be deprived of life, but

it was, and well, besides, the russian judicial system, it has made great progress, but we all admit, that it, well, let’s say, could also be improved, here is the introduction of mortal executions, it seems to me, should be combined with the improvement of at least that part of the judicial system. ethnic, religious situation in the caucasus, of course, this is absolutely obvious, this is

absolutely obvious, moreover, we have messages worthy of attention that the decision to use all our, here is internal interethnic relations, problems associated with migration, in order to shake up the situation in russia, they were adopted last year with the participation, of course, of western patrons and sponsors,

but look at dagestan, and maybe indeed, these relationships are quite harmonious, and what we saw is a tragic, but isolated phenomenon, but i think we need to figure it out, we need to figure it out. now i want to ask you a question, andrei ivanovich, about what happened in crimea. let's see what the presidential press secretary, dmitry peskov, said about this. we see, on the one hand...

that is, in these words, this is the clear position of the russian authorities, if this is so, what conclusions, practical conclusions can be drawn from this? conclusions will have to be drawn, here in which is why the complexity and tragedy of the situation: what

you referred to, what the presidential press secretary said, is not new, in fact, he said it. that is, as if collateral damage or collateral victims, we were talking about murder, let's call a spade a spade, the murder of civilians during the nato bombing of yugoslavia, now essentially the same thing is happening, so you can probably, this is of course not an excuse, and not even explanation, but to say that someone tried to

attack a military facility, but something like this they missed there. but here in this case it is absolutely obvious that it was a purposeful action with the same purpose, whether it had a connection with the dagestan, this dagestan tragedy or not, we don’t know, but what a demonstrative action in order to sow panic among the population, this is quite obvious, i looked very carefully at the statements on this matter in washington and kiev, let's start with washington, do you know what they say? you don’t know, but you know that this is not russia, this is not at all, no, you know, why don’t you know, they don’t say anything, but in such a situation, in such a situation, the press secretary of the president of the united states, or the press representative of the state department,

for them to say something, for me this speaks for itself. who, by the way, they say in kiev are ukrainian citizens, they are civilians, civilian occupiers, whom

it is absolutely normal to destroy like this. let's see what the russian ministry of defense said about this. while repelling a missile attack , air defense forces on duty intercepted four american missiles. atakoms detonation of the fragmentation warhead of the fifth american missile in the air led to numerous casualties among civilians in sevastopol. all flight missions for the american atacoms operational-tactical missiles are entered by american specialists based on their own us satellite reconnaissance data. therefore, responsibility for the deliberate missile strike on civilians in sevastopol lies primarily with washington, which supplied these weapons to ukraine, as well as the kiev regime from whose territory this the blow was struck. such actions will not remain.

in fact, i have long held the point of view that since the americans are aiming these missiles, since they, so to speak, launch them on the basis of their satellite reconnaissance data, it’s time, it’s time to simply restore order over the equator of the black sea, i say again that when the americans bombed yugoslavia, they did not declare the adriatic. zone, so to speak, no-fly zone, there was no such official, but they warned everyone publicly that it was unsafe to fly there, because

that nato aircraft are operating there, conducting military operations against yugoslavia. i think we should have done the same thing a long time ago , to warn everyone that flying over the black sea, but with the exception of the territorial airspace of bulgaria, romania and turkey, it is unsafe that... they expose themselves, so to speak, there is a danger of being shot down, and it is necessary to shoot down all these, so to speak, means, there are american drones and french reconnaissance aircraft, british reconnaissance aircraft, all of them are involved not only in the introduction of reconnaissance, but in the guidance of missiles, and the fact that these are attacks, missile attacks ms, and in equipment. in cluster munitions, this is generally prohibited, just in case, the use of cluster munitions, they are no longer embarrassed at all. i'm right, general, that if the intent was to strike

a military target, a cluster warhead would be far from optimal. well, of course not, well , cluster, cluster, cluster munition, it is designed to destroy manpower enemy, it is not intended to destroy any objects. well, the only thing... can, so to speak, be used, with a sufficient degree of effectiveness, uh, if an attack is made on airfields, the airfield and the planes are located, and the helicopters are in open parking lots, but here, well, if there is a message there, it seems like they were planning to strike at bilbek, in our opinion, but it is located aside, so to speak, indeed the missile should have turned away from this target to strike at the resort area on the black sea coast, apparently, they they were going to strike at the headquarters, one of the units that are located, well, in a certain

proximity to this beach in uchkuevka, but the question is not that they were there in the wrong place, the question is the fundamental choice of target crimea and sevastopol, and this was done absolutely deliberately, this was done with the blessing of the americans, who for a long time...

to crimea, sevastopol, which occur constantly, continuously, and so on, in this case led to such tragic victims among children and civilians . we after all, they had already splashed down an american drone once, and they did it very masterfully, without touching it or striking it, but at the same time in this virtuosity there was also some kind of bashfulness, we seemed to make excuses later and said, well, what can they be? claims, it just fell, yes, well... andrei ivanovich, there was a ripper back then , after all, we can’t get the global hock like that, considering that it flies at an altitude of 18 km, only the s-400 can reach it. absolutely true, but what you are talking about here is more or more is spreading in our public opinion, because i think thousands, millions of people are asking themselves the question, of course, of course, then we must either do this, or answer why we don’t do it, because while all this is hanging in

the air, it has now appeared. well, i was told that russia has a lot of things like that, worse than something like that, then the question arises, generals, if they want to destroy normal life in crimea, and we can stop all grain exports from odessa, dmitry, you just as they say, the words were taken out of my mouth, i believe that this is our answer. it was

said that without an answer this will not be left unanswered, it seems to me that there is no need, so to speak, perhaps, since this is the position of the president, not to hit civilian targets, not to allow large casualties among the civilian population, but these unmanned boats are known , where they are, so to speak , manufactured, based, all this is the coastal strip, this is ochakov, this is odessa, so destroy the entire port, port infrastructure. in odessa, in nikolaev, in ochakov, in my opinion, it would be the most a reasonable answer, these are not civilian purposes, these are purely, so to speak, well, at least dual-use objects, otherwise shipping is going on, ports are working, cranes are loading something, containers, and we look at it, sort of, unmanned boats do, i have only

one addition, you said that these unmanned sea drones, or boats, they caused certain damage, indeed, certain damage to the black sea fleet, we are deprived of the opportunity to incur similar damage to the ukrainian fleet, because it does not exist, it no, yes, but at the same time there is, i spoke about the ships that carry ukrainian goods, but as for ships, maybe it will come to that, but as for the actual port infrastructure, especially...

if this is the case , then what you say also has every reason for these juice cargoes, if this is established, to be sunk completely calmly, i, despite the very competent group at this table, will not try to recommend to the command, what exactly to do and against the united states, and against ukraine, but one thing is clear to me: that when the ministry of defense says that something will not go unanswered, it is not the ministry of foreign affairs, but the ministry of defense, when everyone says that the responsibility for this attack lies with washington on the biden administration, then it is obvious to me that there must be some kind of answer that will be understandable, which will relate, if you like, to

a sense of security, and perhaps to their electoral popularity, precisely for those who make such decisions, and such decisions we all said they accept. not in kiev, now the answer to this is my statement, it is very good, rather than do you want to provoke an escalation of confrontation with nato? answer: i categorically do not want to, and i understand perfectly well the responsibility that lies with the supreme leader, not to make decisions that could, to use his expression, really bring us all to the point.

and warn that it is unsafe to fly there, either piloted or unmanned, but in my opinion, no, in any case, dmitry, you are absolutely they are right, they are escalating, and the fact that we, our

very restrained position, it is really perceived as weakness, i really, i ’m waiting for the first ones to arrive there in the sixteenth, where they will be based, if god forbid they will be based on... by the way, two air bases have been identified in five territories of neighboring countries, and there are already countries, there are poland, slovakia, romania, hungary, bulgaria, one, one air base in moldova and nine jump airfields on the territory of ukraine, if that happens so, then, well, we just have to strike at these air bases, regardless of what it leads to. thank you, we're leaving for advertising, we'll be back in just a few minutes. let's talk about a very serious topic, about the topic of president putin's visit to korea, north korea and vietnam, before it was northern vietnam, now it is one vietnam, a topic that

is naturally very important and also provokes very different reactions in the region and especially in west, i will naturally turn to you, andrey ivanovich, let's go to advertising.

i say, guys, what will happen will be, and it cannot be avoided, exclusive with dmitry borisov, premiere on saturday on the first, the big game is on the air, now on skype with us from the united states, famous military analyst scott ritter, we welcome you, thank you for taking the time, yes, hello, thank you for wanting to know your reaction what just happened, the attack on

sevastopol, where many civilians were killed , do you think the united states is responsible for this? 100% this is a shameful, shameful act, a criminal act committed by ukraine with the complicity of the united states. if the us did not want such attacks occurred, they could ensure this, because such attacks without the assistance of the united states are impossible, it is the united states that provides intelligence information, it is the united states that provides coordinates, america participates directly, not only at the technical, but at the political level, this was done directly in order to ... provoke an excessive reaction from russia, i want to draw your

attention to the fact that in july there is a nato summit in washington and they are now in a panic because russia is winning on the battlefield, therefore, if it is not possible to change the military-political situation, provoking russia to take some irresponsible measures. in response to which nato could take an even tougher position, if this is not done, they understand that the war will be lost, so they are desperately trying to come up with something now, something and this leads to donald trump with more more likely to become the next president of the united states, so nato is now in a panic, they are afraid. that the conflict will last, trump will eventually intervene and

ruin the whole game for them, so they are trying now to mix the cards and provoke russia into some drastic actions, well, of course , sometimes overreacting is just as bad as under-reacting, but i don’t fully understand, if only russia, like you...

russia acts, that’s what their calculation is , but

in fact they are behaving absolutely irresponsibly, neither the american people nor the peoples of european countries will support this kind of terrorist actions, and what happened in sevastopel is certainly a terrorist attack, a terrorist attack. what are they trying to achieve? they're pushing for expansion conflict with russia. they don't want a nuclear war, but they want it to be a more intense war to justify all the military spending. scott with us now is konstantin zatulin, deputy chairman of the duma committee on the cis, and he would like to ask you a question, if you don't mind.

i would probably say this: if such an attack were committed against the united states, then we would use all means at our disposal to destroy those who carried out such an attack, so that such an attack could never happen again, and we

would use all the means available to us to achieve this, for example, when the events of september 11, 2001 occurred, we acted precisely.

this may make north korea more assertive, and accordingly, there may be conflicts that are not beneficial to china, and this can also be used to portray china as a friend of russia and say that china is responsible for this, and this may not be liked some countries in the region, is this empty speculation or behind this there is something, you know, this is more than...

i mean china and us, our border is only 16 km along the foggy river, there is a railway bridge over which trains can run, but only trains, next to the station , with the khasan station, we don’t even have a road connection; as for china, it has a fairly long border, well-established infrastructure, and in general china is, well, to a certain extent, a country that ensures the survival of north korea. i mean quite material in terms of supply of resources and so on, although china, just like us, is forced to weigh its actions against un sanctions and council sanctions. security, for which china, just like us, voted at one time, well, in a completely different situation, nevertheless china naturally finds

opportunities, because without this , north korea simply will not, as i said, not survive. now, as for, as you said to that side of the matter, that maybe this will somehow spur some kind of, well , i didn’t say that, that’s it, yes, that was said for you, yeah, well, you know, here we are we can... only just guess, but i have a feeling that generally speaking, if we are now talking about greater coordination between our capitals, then probably, not probably, for sure, i ’m sure of it, and this issue will be sort of resolved , and these kinds of difficulties, if they exist at all, i think that they really don’t exist, i have the feeling that they in beijing know how to voice their own. concerns when necessary, and if they wanted, they would find some acceptable formula to voice these concerns,

this is not happening, fortunately there are as many opportunities for this as possible, in may there was a visit of our president to beijing, and i would consider all these three visits to beijing, philyan to vietnam together, secondly, soon, very soon, in early july we will have another opportunity for dialogue at the highest level. level of the shanghai cooperation organization summit, so if there is a need to dot some issues, this will be done, but in my opinion, in my opinion, we have a fairly well-functioning mechanism of diplomatic interaction and diplomatic support of political actions. thank you, but now general, i have to ask you, since this is already in your area, and do you know that there was a terrible threat about this?

there is, because we absolutely, this information, in general, it was not already voiced, when the americans, when they needed to supply 155mm shells, they ran out in europe , the american warehouses were empty, they simply bought a million of these shells from south korea , who then went to ukraine, and south korea knew very well where, they didn’t hide it, they practically announced it publicly, so yes, south korea

also has good tanks there, which they supply, again to poland, well, you know, i don’t believe in the generosity of the poles, the poles can give ukraine, so to speak, soviet tanks, soviet aircraft, but as for western equipment or south korean tanks, they will not give it to ukraine, they even when the americans said that they... rocket shells for the patriot system will be transferred to ukraine to the detriment of their allies, the first one who was upset was the president of poland duda, who said, how can this be, here on the front line we seem to be defending nato, and the missiles are being given to some ukraine, so i don’t know, so to speak, how our cooperation with north korea, but it will happen.

the world media is full of headlines that

the head of meath great britain became the victim of an unknown person who called him on behalf of peter.'

a guest of your program from the united states, scott ritter. indeed, emotions always overwhelm us with just indignation that occurs when civilians die, when attacks are carried out on crimea and sevastopol or the belgorod region. but the best answer, the best, in this case , strategic answer to this is, of course.

in those territories that are today formally or officially subject to the kiev regime. the kyiv regime is in a very difficult situation. the fact that in switzerland zelensky looked like a president is completely unconvincing for the masses of the population in ukraine, which, of course, raises the question of who this zelensky is, why does he control our lives, all

the borders of ukraine are not in the east. where there is a fight with russia, in the west they are mined so that people cannot escape from ukraine, those who should or can be mobilized, therefore it is necessary to offer not only strikes on the territory of ukraine, but palmo inflict on those who are ready with us cooperate, work, and so on, such people exist, they are at risk today, they are in prison, they are repressed, and so on, but they still exist, such people exist for outside of ukraine, ukrainians who...

then at least prevent russia from winning, at least in the foreseeable future and at an acceptable price, so you think, this is all this pumping ukraine up with weapons, we can somehow relate to this, but i don’t want to say complacently, but without extreme concern, no, we must take this into account, well, there are shortcomings in these supplies, i talked a lot about them, and this is a very large, so to speak, variety, uh.

and there are signs of such fractures, here is one of such signs, which manifested itself especially in recently, units have begun to surrender in platoons and even companies; there, the ninety-second brigade , almost a battalion there, surrendered, simply raised their hands, so to speak, and went over to the side of the russian federation. 6.00 people are , according to official data, already in camps on the territory of the russian federation and... a significant part of whom simply voluntarily surrendered, this is one of the signs that not only are the personnel not motivated, but they are already on the entire line

of contact, combat contact, on the entire front line, there simply aren’t enough people, so this frantic transfer of reserves from sub-hours to yarov, kharkov and back, of course, will not bring the ukrainian army to any good, will you agree or disagree with my statement? that in order for the west to become more cautious about the supply of weapons to ukraine, especially long-range weapons, and especially so that they do not send their contingents to ukraine, it is important that they understand that by doing this they are not only helping ukraine, but they are setting up to ourselves, whether it matters or not, i i think it's important, but if you don't agree,