how it gets dark, my, still mine, nazarrushka, come to me quickly! for what? it hurts, it hurts, back, stop what you said to varka, it’s poor, but nothing like that, really, don’t give it to me, she told me to give it to her if she doesn’t love her, she said: take it, “remember, i

love varka more than my life, if you do some nasty things to her, i’ll tear out your legs, i’ll regret that the world was born, don’t come up to catch up, if you see her on the street, go to the other side, it’s clear why back, she doesn’t need you, i need you, by christ god, i pray! " get away from varka, i will love you so much, you will forget the light,

she was running around at night, so she ran into trouble, i told you that this wouldn’t end well, dad, she’s barely alive, tomorrow you’ll raise her, tomorrow i’d have no one to raise, misha, get out of here, we’re on our own, let’s, let’s, uh-huh,

well, that's it, go, everything will be fine, you're my beauty, my smart girl, my good one, well, well, you cry, cry, it will be easier, there is no such trouble as to get into a noose for it, there is, there is a big game on the air, today, addressing the participants in the primakov readings, russian president vladimir putin said: that the question of

negotiations with the west remains very relevant, but he recalled that russia has put forward very specific proposals on this matter.

on the ukrainian crisis, proposed a specific formula that is of a completely detailed legal nature, our president, addressing the diplomatic corps of our country at an extended meeting of the board, outlined the russian vision of how the ukrainian crisis could not only be suspended, but completed, resolved deeply, this statement, this proposal was made the day before. conferences in switzerland, which many mistakenly call a peace conference on ukraine, according to the content of the discussion that we heard there, it was rather a conference about the continuation of the war, a conference about the continuation of this conflict for the next year, since the central thesis of our opponents

is still the thesis about inflicting a strategic defeat on russia, creating conditions in which our country would abandon its goals in... in this polyphony, in which the central american voice was nevertheless visible, one can see the fact that neither the united states nor their allies in western europe will be ready for meaningful negotiations in the near future, despite individual statements appearing in the public space, quite chaotic, including from, say, the french president, who intended to send french troops six months ago to ukraine. this is a statement where he was open to resuming dialogue with our country, these statements should rather be interpreted as the reaction of western elites to the surprising results of the electoral processes, in fact, in western countries, there is a growing wave of discontent not only in

the united states itself, where the republican party has made one of the sore points for the administration of the current president - criticism of the company in ukraine, but in large western, western european countries, in germany, there is a growing wave of discontent along this line, unilateral, exalted government lines to support ukraine, in france, the president, who believed that his sudden decision to hold early elections would give him some new trump card, also completely paradoxically, surprisingly for him, it gives a negative result. britain has a conservative government. apparently living out his last weeks and months, expecting a historic defeat in the next parliamentary elections, all these circumstances do not give confidence to western leaders, and in order to give some kind of pass, and to demonstrate to potential voters

that those restrictions are economic, including which western countries are facing as a result of the ukrainian crisis , they will someday be completed, at the end of this there is light in the tunnel. the head of the foreign policy bloc of our country , the president himself, has repeatedly testified that no real progress, no steps towards substantive meaningful negotiations are coming from the west. andronik mavsyasovich, i was at a meeting in the kremlin with the media, where the president spoke. he spoke about this proposal there immediately after meade’s expanded board, where this proposal was put forward, i had the clear impression that the president took this seriously without illusions, i mean,

not that he expected that it would be taken and immediately accepted, with applause or even without it, but that he had a strong feeling that... that it makes sense to try, so i have a question for you: you can try by -different, you can try, you can try. bringing new analytical arguments, you can try by appealing to the common sense of the american and other western elites, but you can try using forceful methods, be it on the battlefield in ukraine itself or some kind of military response to those who actually strike russia. i say: the united states, its allies, or at least are funding and sponsoring these

strikes. you became famous in russia at the end, and not only in russia, at the end of the eighties , when you wrote your article: “ an iron hand is needed.” and this concerned russian domestic politics. i am interested in your opinion now about russian foreign policy.

are changing not in favor of the kiev regime and its owners, therefore, well, anyone who has any prudence should analyze this chain of situations, when every new the proposal was rejected, the situation for the ukrainian regime became worse and worse. we said, we will always be ready for peaceful negotiations, but...

therefore, while there is an opportunity, we must come to terms with this, but then they must understand that

the defeat of ukraine is inevitable, but in washington today, at least until november, no one not ready to accept, because biden has tied himself so strongly to ukrainian affairs that a defeat in ukraine is like a defeat for biden and his defeat during the presidential elections, which is why they are not ready for...

the usa was also hurt, but even more than that, i will say, today, well, i had to think especially about the last 2 weeks when i heard that the americans, the western powers, gave permission to strike deep into russian territory with new missiles there and

so on and so on, and i thought about one very important... because what is happening, in fact, if earlier they simply supplied weapons, supplied advisers, and so on, but today the united states is really, especially this was shown by the events, the last one strike on sevastopol, that american intelligence officers, satellites, they program, they direct, they strike with these

missiles that are on the ground.

honestly, over the years they have changed right before our eyes, we respected them for so long, even loved them, but it turned out that there was nothing to love them for. because now they are in such a rage, they so want to finish off russia, i think that all the origins go back to the last century, the fact that we defeated nazism then,

they knocked it out, but in general these seeds of nazism were not able to reach the end hit, more moreover, they sprouted, the time has come, and as it turned out, it was no coincidence that all european countries were afraid, this is the most terrible thing, before they were afraid of our nuclear weapons, tactical, strategic, now they are not afraid, because the americans say :

don’t be afraid, nothing will happen to you, the most important thing is that the americans don’t care who dies there, ukrainians, russians or someone, poles over time, the main thing for them is that russia weakens, i think that sergeevich lavrov is absolutely you're right, you have to be patient, everyone’s hands are itching after the next one... for the neo-nazis from kiev, for people like budanov, a scoundrel, and it’s too painful to list them, these are all candidates for the

bench of a new international tribunal, we haven’t come up with a name yet, but sooner or later it will be, i think that if they are leading to a world war, a third world war, they must understand that there will simply be no one left there, i think that the americans understand this, they are the only one who understands, and the europeans have simply gone crazy, but when i i look at these, excuse me, funny armies, french, there polish, especially the estonian army has become very dangerous, i think you should use your brains, we are not threatening anyone, our president has said more than once, we don’t need new territories, god willing, let him develop his own, but what we belongs historically, i mean the lands of new russia, we must return, so we must be patient. it is clear that it is easy to talk, but hard to do all this and wait for our victory. i agree that we need to wait for our

victory, but before uh, victory happens, we must win. and the problem is that, uh, uh, the enemies of russia, that they don’t just strike the beaches, this is a tragedy. this is disgusting, but it does not change the balance of forces, but they are very seriously engaged in striking russian rear areas, weapons depots, command and control points. now, could this give them a chance to win? no, because ukraine, they use ukrainian cannon fodder, and this meat is arriving now.

i'm afraid to say that emotions should not guide us, but they should play a role in our specific decisions, the second thing that needs to be taken into account, it seems to me, is that the entire collective west is now arming itself against russia, here we need to remember the time factor, they are now talking in germany, in the nato command. that russia will attack them in 27-29, that russia will be ready to attack, my opinion is analytical and at the level of intuition. what do they

mean, that they will be ready, that they will be ready, to start a full-scale war against russia, what are we waiting for? no, we won't wait, moreover, i think we we are preparing to strike back, i have no doubts, but we have learned to do more, talk less, please note, yesterday there was a message that a drone was shot down over the black sea.

heard uja sudi napolitano scott ritter, who said that here, who said that i just, judge, i was just on the program. on the russian program with dmitry simes, they asked me a question, well, he listed there what he said and so on, but something else is important, when judge napolitana asked how russia would answer, because here he is in he said on air, america, if something like this happened to them, they would use all their power, this, they would use all their power to punish those who did this to them, but...

the states in war games, i know very well that in war... games the result largely depends on how you formulate your question, the question to which experts react, so if, for example, in 1962, president kennedy would have told his advisers, during the cuban missile attack crisis, if he told them how they could find a way? to avoid escalation, then i assume that the result would be very different than if his real question was never answered: how do we achieve the results we need, the removal of

soviet missiles, without causing a world war. do you agree that we need, if you will, to orient our approach to all of these... situations, without, of course, losing common sense and reasonable precautions, but to develop a mentality where we are focused on winning, and not only at the level of rhetoric, but also to subordinate to necessity winning our specific analysis ultimately results in our desired results. dmitry, you are a historian by training, so the metaphor that i will offer you will be quite familiar to you. the russian expert strategic community is rich and generous in talent, different points of view are heard and different opinions are expressed behind closed doors and in public, and the discussion that is now taking place in russia, in moscow, is somewhat

reminiscent of the discussion of the russian headquarters during the patriotic war of the twelfth years when there were two large groups of generals, intellectuals who... both intended to win, but one of them, led by bagration, considered the line of the general staff of barclayda tolya, and then kutuzov, erroneous retreats of concentration.

to moscow, he realized that this was a dead end, that this was

a defeat, that he did not have the resources to continue the campaign, he could not extend it for another cycle, for at least another six months, and then it began, first organized, and then less and less organized flight, which we observed in different circumstances, for russia this strategy is a positional strategy, it is classic, we often use it, it allows, even if at a certain stage leaving... very figuratively presented as unconditionally

effective, with great impudence, mobilizing forces, to quickly inflict defeats, using emotional metaphors, intimidating, this is a classic strategy of destruction that the united states did not always help , and in general we can’t find many examples in history when this very resource-intensive strategy worked brilliantly, andrey, everything you said is not only the honest truth, i i subscribe to each one. and of course, there was a great influence of

the self-government that you spoke about, about which president putin recently spoke very positively. if there had been no battle of borodino, no battle of borodino, then of course napoleon would have occupied moscow, but he would have occupied it with his entire army. and he would have a greater opportunity, he would have a greater opportunity to control.

literally in a few minutes. the world media is full of headlines that the head of meath great britain has become a victim of the unknown.

he essentially said that the next president will be trump, and he influenced the speaker, that is, this is interference in internal affairs, he is convinced that putin wants part of the north of kazakhstan, you told them that putin wants to seize their state, which means they are scared, because humanly substitutes both trump and the minister of foreign affairs of kazakhstan, this will not be forgiven, from now on cameron can be considered a political dwarf, prime minister. vavan and lexus show, tomorrow on the first. the big game is on air. we just talked about grand strategy, about that very difficult

the choice to be made in moscow, first of all, by the supreme commander-in-chief, of course, with the support of the general staff and the ministry.

today, unfortunately, it is not personal qualities and bright personalities, but political parties and the financial structures behind them that decide the fate of elections, so today, this morning, i just watched all the programs that are naturally dedicated only to debates, only american, only debates, after that everything is already, i don’t know, popcorn is like fried corn in our country, or what is it?

danabashki, yes, the moderators of this debate, but you can imagine, that’s why, here i am, by the way, they thought if he didn’t agree, but then they were afraid that biden wouldn’t agree either, but this is called the lesser evil, trump chose , that is, there is or no debate at all.

trump decided that this was a lesser evil, and everyone advised him not to start it, but dmitry and i discussed trump’s behavior many times.

americans believe that biden should not run for office because he is not fit psychologically, physically and cognitively, with my thinking abilities, i understood.

supposedly didn’t even read it, so we have to understand that this is trump’s style of decisions,

he talks to someone, probably listens to someone, makes a decision at the last moment, and of course, what will he, say, say at the republican congress party, it will depend not only on what he believes is in the interests of america, but also what he believes will be in the interests of his company, in these conditions he knows so...

all these symptoms, all these scenarios will be for american allies, for large group countries they have signed up to be participants in this ukrainian crisis will be a symptom that... the disruption of the american political process threatens not just american goals and interests in different parts of the world, but threatens the main asset that the united states still holds in the eyes of their allies, an asset of trust, many actions of american allies are not described by common sense and logic, they rely on trust, they believe that the united states knows better how... in these conditions to behave, what resources need to be spent to achieve this strategic goal, and how long this company

can last, and if these elections are given -

what russia does should be determined by practical considerations, and not by some abstract concepts. we are leaving for advertising, we will be back in just a few minutes, and we will talk with general dzhabarov about the enemies are no longer external, but internal enemies, which, as we will see, are also not asleep.

for the sale of real estate, mutual reproaches from dmitry shepelev and zhanna’s father vladimir friske. if we had not trusted this person, she might have lived for at least another six months. our exclusive life after life, zhanna. i always say, guys, what will happen will be. and this cannot be avoided. exclusive with dmitry borisov. premiere on saturday. on the first.

they go over to the side of the enemy, i emphasize, they openly go over to the side of the enemy and wish russia, almost death, almost... non-disappearance from the map of the world, here it seems to me, here it seems to me that sentimentality is inappropriate, so let’s listen to what russia wants, a person like alexander galdfarb, who left the soviet union a very long time ago, but came to russia more than once, was very active with soros, whom he helped in russia, with berezovsky and now... appears very actively on youtube, where he expresses his political preferences, let's listen to what he hopes for, what the future of russia will be like, if, as

we would like to hope, russia will be severely, well, damaged both politically and economically as a result of this... he appeared there at the very end soviet period and even posed as an adviser and almost a representative of boris yeltsin.

he also lives in washington for quite a long time, but when i asked people who worked for boris yeltsen, andronik knows for sure even who, they said, who is this person? let's listen to mr. piantkovsky. it’s not clear now that for the real, for the use of aircraft that will change the rules of the game in general, will allow ukraine to win, and we are talking about victory, about the defeat of russia, we don’t need dozens, we need hundreds, at least two hundred aircraft, we must abandon the dogma that they should be flown only by ukrainian crews, well, this one is already known, i am sure to our viewer, a person like ilya ponomarev.