oh styopa, styop, what are you doing, are you crazy? he’s gone, lol, i love you, so don’t make things up, and i don’t dare approach you, i’ll hit you, but the bear doesn’t value you at all, i can see, and i’ll carry you around in my arms, blow away the dust, what nonsense are you talking about? then you say, look at yourself, you’re very small, but i’m already sixteen years old, what? sixteenth year, styopa, you're laughing, i'm not at you, styop, styopa, okay, forget it, no, ferry, styopa,

come on, step aside, let's go, let's go, where are you climbing under the tree? didn't hear that shouted? i heard everything is fine, dad, what should i load? well, get off, i’ll go to the plot myself, i’ll see that it worked, stay here with the bear, the two of you can chop, great!

styopka, stop, styopka!

why do you want a pie for nazar and varya, why do you care who this is your half a year, oh, really half a year, how did you remember it, thank you, mom, tell it. i

’ll be baking this week too, i’ll give you some batrushkas, yeah, oh. it’s some kind of holiday, but you forgot, we’ve been feeling sad for six months today, and the neighbors reminded us, it’s funky, hmm, some kind of weed, what an interesting taste, deniska, after all, i had to tear myself away from her, can you eat my share? if you want, uh-huh, yes, i won’t refuse, that’s all, we’ll leave this to the parents, they’ll come from the field to eat, uh-huh, son, you want some milk,

and uh, some steamed milk, oh, son, are you, are you being a fool? i ate wolfberry, i told you not to eat wolfberry, remember, remember, i said, i remember, i just made a pie, nothing more, drink, drink,

waka, boiling, cooking! there's a big game on the air, when i look at the latest statements from washington, london, paris, brussels, and, well, berlin, i have the question arises, this is how you can deal with these people, there is an attack on crimea, during this attack.

to come precisely from, if you will, from a scientific point of view, there is such a direction in science, international relations, international relations, in it there are two types of the largest groups of theories: the first theory is called positivist, which is believed

that the reality of international relations is, well, for example, there is terrorism, there is an act of aggression, there are parties to the conflict, their description and understanding. and their interpretation actions, this is a question of schools, there are liberal schools, realism, there is also an english club, but they are all called positivist theory, because they recognize the reality of both economics and politics, and there is the so-called. to verify, because there is no reality, it seems to us like some kind of madness, but i see that over the last 30 or 40 years,

this theoretical model, the post-positivist theory of international relations, which is based on a principle that is very difficult for us to understand, that reality doesn't exist it is created, that the world in which we live is made by our discourses, our projects, our advertising, our media, our blogs, our culture, but there is no reality. in this case , even one of these classical post-positivist works is called the world that we make ourselves, the world of our making, anufa, the idea is that they create a world in which putin is a villain, russia lost, trump no longer participates in the elections , because he is a nonentity, populist forces are failing, globalism is coming, ukrainians are beautiful victims, tender unfortunates.

international relations, so shouldn't we make it out of this? some very radical conclusion that if this is so, and no fact-checking, no evidence, no

examples, no evidence, no appeals to international law, we are nothing to these people who create actively, boldly, brazenly, regardless of anything world, we won’t be able to prove it to them, maybe we should create our own world, maybe multipolarity should be turned into our positivist theory and assert, in fact, addressing, say, not to them, but over their heads. to the masses, to various opposition groups in the west, to all participants, as we are doing now, in africa, in north korea, in the islamic world, in china, in india, that is, to build our own world, in fact, without waiting, how the west evaluates this or that action, how they themselves evaluate it, we are dealing with a completely impenetrable wall, which is simply deaf to any arguments. it is deaf to reality and this is systemic, this is where philosophy should be, because if we

carefully engaged in philosophical processes, we would see that this is happening, gradually this is from the theories that were formulated by post-positivist theories 30-40 years ago, we have now come to this post-positivist practice, what we see in modern politics in the west is that , which can be considered post-positivism, there is no reality, pure nihilism, so maybe we can give them a fight on...

somehow it didn’t occur to me that they actively suggested that you repent, somehow it didn’t occur to me that i can them ignore, they clearly didn’t think in these terms, and it didn’t occur to me that i could convince them, and it didn’t occur to me that i could then appeal to world and even village public opinion, in general

i had to do this , what they are doing -

they took and stole billions of russian money from us, so they took and stole billions of russian money from us, they are also trying to give a significant part of this money to ukraine, so that with the help of this money they can kill russian people, just like that, exactly like that, so are we

we are developing, the ministry of finance is developing...

in this sense, maybe a little more down-to-earth, perhaps due to the fact that as a graduate of the soviet education system, i still remained under the strong impression of marxism, i never forget this sacramental phrase , to which marx is vague, but of course you remember, by the way, as it turned out, it was not marx, someone before him said, but she came out of it, when we are talking about one hundred percent profit, there is no such crime that capital will not be used for, in my opinion look, it's all about money here, then, what they do, and it’s very pragmatic, it ’s this, it’s just business, as i gave you an example recently, i liked the phrase “hero brad pitt” in some action movie, but the phrase is good, the action movie is not so-so, he says, america is not a country, it is a business, we

are talking about bringing russia down, bringing it in. to a state where it can be robbed, when it comes to this profit, they absolutely do not care, in this sense, marx is absolutely right, and lenin was right in his famous book, imperialism as the highest stage, when he said that financial capital, now we are dealing specifically with financial capital, it will never stop, it needs the whole world, this is the nature of financial capital, that’s all, and there are no lyrics here, so the main thing i agree with is that it doesn’t even make sense to us to be upset about this topic, we just need to accept this fact, understand who we are dealing with , they will not stop, they cannot stop, this is...

intuitively, unfortunately, most western people support this, so there are no protests, and doesn't even scare me anymore and there is a nuclear war, because internally the western man in the street understands that we are talking about money, about big money that can either be won or lost, so it seems to me that this system needs to be struck here. it is necessary, she understands, unfortunately, she only understands force, she, she doesn’t understand the other conversation, of course, to strike, it’s obvious to me that it’s not so

easy, let’s say, it’s not easy at all, but i understand something else, that this is a question , you have talked about this many times, alexander, this is a question your mental attitudes, it is very important how you formulate. a different mental approach, when i hear about how difficult it is to do something, on the one hand i agree, on the other, i

think all the time, what i read in the reports of the rend corporation, the center for strategic international studies in washington, about all these measures that they feared russia might take against the united states, and many of these measures in general could be taken. i don’t know, effective, let’s say, effective, what worries me is that at least in the open literature in moscow, i don’t see anything like that, i don’t see a discussion of this, so i see a discussion of how to avoid escalation, i don’t see a discussion of how to demonstrate to another country our capabilities, our determination, when our ruthlessness is necessary, why is this what happens? because, excuse me, two words, you are absolutely right, different goals, different tasks, different methods, because it’s one thing when you set yourself the goal of

defeating the enemy, it’s a completely different thing when you set yourself a goal, somehow... that how, as they say, to resist his blows, these are different things, even sometimes, even the goal seems impossible, but when it is somehow. way she, so they set a goal for themselves, but we don’t set such a goal, it seems to me, there is here, i completely agree with this, this, but we just found ourselves on a mental, just an intellectual level, we are not ready for a head-on, head-on collision with the west, the west over the past 30-odd years, has actually formed within russia that expert layer that is fundamentally does not work in the mode of confrontation with the west and does not... cannot imagine, cannot set this goal that georgievich is talking about, you are talking about victory, that is, this is the category of experts who with the west can

only see peace or an annoying conflict that it is immediately necessary to extinguish at any cost, that is, go for a de-escalation for peace negotiations, they dream of restoring relations with the west, why, because this layer, their own...

no one touched them, they are just adults, for 30 years - this half my life, these people, which were formed in the western model, today we are at war with it, we need to set a goal, a clear goal, how to defeat the west, when we imagine these experts, our average statistical ones, then i can’t imagine almost any of them , they come out, let's think about how we can defeat the west, not at any, not even in the security council, no, they will talk about how to avoid escalation, how... to make it, soften it, what, in the strategic game, in theory igor what actions can we take? we can sacrifice, what we can stop at, only such a discourse, but a discourse that, how can we win, let’s see what needs to be done for this, how can we respond to the escalation that we are not raising, on the other side and in no way, we are just using spells about peace or its desire to reduce this

escalation, we cannot influence them, but it is obvious.

and how comprador capitalism can fight the west, it depends entirely on it, comprador capitalism implies not only capitalism, not only the bourgeoisie, it it means culture, it means experts, it means the whole system, in my opinion, our president began to change this in an evolutionary way back in the 2000s, so to speak, in the 10s, most likely in these years, but

the problem is that he is trying to do it. to do it in an evolutionary way, in principle, in conditions, in conditions, in other conditions, this is absolutely the right path, but today everything is becoming more simplified, so in fact, in fact , the basis for this comprador capitalism, it has objectively disappeared, because the west itself he cut it off, but as they say, this one was cut off there, but the head of the professor doule exists, there is no body, but it exists and continues, and here already...

we need a different mentality, we need a new generation of experts, as you know, several generations were required russian people, so that after ivan kolyta, the collector of russian lands, a golden label from the mongol khan, in order to prepare for this those people who came out with dmitry donskoy, this...

well, what are we going to do, wife, you carry mishka’s bastard, you can kill, you can drive away who there, boy, give it to where you took him, your boy died, how he died, and he was crying, i heard, it seemed to you, boy, take it to the house, two banks, premiere. before the serial film. tomorrow, after the program time. many years ago, my son brought you a child. he's alive. the big game is on air. and now with us from

the united states, columbia university professor jeffrey sachs, one of the most respected economists. world and a man who was not afraid to raise his voice in the united states, discussing, well, let's put it this way, some inaccuracies in how the biden administration and more broadly the american political elite see the world. jeffrey, thank you for your time. yes, dmitry, i’m always glad to be on your show. for us in moscow the most relevant, you know what happened in crimea, you know about the tragedy in sevastopol, you know that in other russian cities, missiles

produced in the united states often land now, nevertheless, president biden and his advisers , they say that america is not participating in the war.

resting, many people died, much more people were injured, and this american missile, which was clearly guided by the american military, was clear from the very beginning that it was the united states that provided personnel, coordinates, and intelligence information. and so on, so yes, we do have to admit that this is a war in which the united states is irresponsibly involved. as

an american, i understand what is happening with our foreign policy. we have a president about whom we don’t even understand what’s going on in his head. let's look from the point of view of the united states, we have a war in ukraine, we have a monstrous

war in the middle east, and the united states is an accomplice in this war. our relations with china are worsening, and a crisis is flaring up in our relations with iran, that is, externally. us politics is in a terrible state, there is no sign of diplomacy, it is in flux. secretary of state and national security adviser to the president. we do not see on the part of the united states any respect, no serious attitude towards the red lines that russia has outlined. no no limiting factors.

what amazes me is when in moscow, more broadly in russia, they understand the danger of escalation, they talk about the danger of escalation, but when i look at washington, at new york, at the american political and business elite, i have the feeling that for them the main issue is , how to put more pressure on russia and how to punish putin, but there is no understanding of how... you know, i see that

the us place in the world is in a state of free fall, so to speak. there are, of course, nato countries and several countries in asia, japan, south korea, australia, new zealand, if you don’t take these countries, and this, in my opinion, is 12% of the world’s population, the rest of the world is looking at what is happening now, they are in shock, people in africa , in latin america. western asia, south asia, china, of course, everyone is in shock. in

some countries in southeast asia too, because no one understands what is happening with american diplomacy? perhaps everything is explained very simply, there are just a few people who decide, and there are incompetent president. governs, and so far it is not visible

what happened is that no one really has any prospects for improvement in the country, because we know that mr. trump is also, to put it mildly, an unsystematic person, yes, he has, of course, some advisers, but people like john bolton wrote memoirs, i personally think that he is an absolutely irresponsible person, so here they are... he tells in his memoirs how trump was manipulated when he was president from the very first day. his assistants only thought how to deceive him, fool him, because he is an inexperienced person, does not understand foreign policy, and so on. personally, i have consistently said over the years that the united states needs to sit down with russia. because when you sit with

a person at the table, it creates a certain atmosphere, it involuntarily forces you to be more responsible, more rational, maybe it will sound naive, but i personally believe in the power of such meetings, when you sit down with a person at the table, i want them to sit down negotiation table with... russian minister lavrov, we talked, because for now, when they talk about the ukraine project. i have never heard them tell the truth when there is talk about sending american troops to ukraine and so on, it doesn’t matter, the americans can say whatever they want, but let the two foreign ministers meet as quickly as possible and let

they will talk. i read in the press that a conversation took place yesterday between russians.

it all started with the fact that in the usa in the fourteenth year they staged a coup ukraine, these are absolutely shameful things that the united states is doing in countries neighboring russia. for them these are some kind of games, but this is not a game. we have two countries. 6 thousand nuclear warheads, so these are not games, they are talking about game theory, these are not games, these are not toys, they are playing with people's lives. jeffrey is, of course, to put it mildly, not a very optimistic analysis of the situation, but nevertheless absolutely necessary. as for

attacks using american missiles, so far, fortunately, these... did it, they can get away with it, and if they didn’t succeed, then they can start crying publicly and saying, you didn’t allow us something, you didn’t give us something, it seems to me that this is a very dangerous situation, unfortunately, i completely agree with you; in

moscow, i repeat, they are seriously talking about the danger of escalation, discussing it not only publicly, but in analytical circles. what can be done about this, but i have the impression that such discussions are not in fashion in washington now. the american president's job is to don’t let other people manipulate you, don’t let countries like ukraine and israel manipulate you. and now it turns out that both israel and ukraine are manipulating the united states.

the world's media is full of headlines that the head of meath great britain became a victim of an unknown person who called him on behalf of petro poroshenko. in this conversation he revealed many secrets of western politics, what did trump answer about the situation in ukraine? he said that

in his opinion putin only wants crimea and donbass, and i said that this is not so, but he allowed to allocate money, some trump, the secret master of the world, trump has all the money, if we can make sure that by november ukraine will be on the front line, then he will want to support the winning side, he essentially said that the next president will be trump. and he influenced the speaker, that is, this interference in internal affairs, from now on cameron can be considered a political dwarf, the prime minister, the vavan and lexus show, today on the first, a big game is on the air, when we hear ritual spells from washington and brussels.

he is accused of publicly supporting the military operation of the russian federation against kiev. karen, maybe we don’t know something, they led a detachment of volunteers, carried out secret operations in ukraine, you know, this, of course, on the one hand is clinical stupidity, like many things, especially, i don’t even know how legally.

so to speak, here we are too, here, come on, this will probably have an effect on someone, i hope that the majority will understand that, in general, you have to choose a side, i chose my side, she very clear, my father was a front-line soldier, i cannot allow the existence of nazism, and the fact that ukraine is an absolutely nazi state, there is no longer any doubt about it, they demonstrate this in your case,

write it in favor of ukraine, because the minsk agreements, in fact in fact, they were mainly in favor of ukraine, they assumed, if you remember, so to speak, the status there, first some kind of autonomy, then the border was closed, it is clear that then the border would be closed and they would do whatever they wanted, that’s even, to be honest, i probably would was accompanied by the eviction and emigration of hundreds of thousands of ukrainians from these territories. but this was a chance in order not to prevent war, no, he deliberately went to war, why? he

is in a state, so to speak, of feeling, feeling the role that he plays, the whole world needs him, but i must say, this role, in my opinion, will probably have a bad end, such people, or ukrainians, will solve this issue, or he is on... the owners, so, as they say, in this sense i adhere to the point of view that people at some point we must choose our position, it can be difficult, but it is sometimes necessary, i chose mine, i repeat, i can’t, i can’t, as they say, i would betray the memory of my father if i didn’t fight, as best i can, with nazism, which in my opinion - i naturally completely agree with you, i am sure the vast majority of people in russia are in solidarity with you, i also hope that

this will not bring you any benefit.

this is all true, symmetrical things, but it seems to me that there is a thing, there is a significant number of people, here we have the remaining ones who have not yet been re-educated, karen georgivich said correctly, in peacetime they can be re-educated for decades, that is, little by little, explaining, arguing, in wartime there are no resources at all for this, but we have a significant amount of that same fifth column up to now, from which terrorists are recruited, from which accomplices of the drg are recruited, they

are here, this is also at the level of ideas, it all begins. our president, and these networks, they are in opposition, left or right, it doesn’t matter if they are against solidarity with ukraine, either there is no war, or ours is under our control, and not on our territory, and the intelligence services probably and the public know the most prominent figures, at least, we try to respond to the most extreme cases, when all borders come, to this, announce them. modest foreign agents, but foreign agents are still not a criminal sentence, this is not some kind of public condemnation, it is simply, strictly speaking, the status of a person living at the expense of another unfriendly country that is hostile to us, but there is a significant group of people who are in our department, who have not yet escaped and who, in general, are the bearers

of this completely destructive ideology, it seems to me in this regard. if someone who supports russia appears in ukraine or even in the west, or even in the west, even some european, i have an acquaintance, yes, an acquaintance , geopolitician emrik shaprat, he says: i lost everything in france, he is a major geopolitician, a french student of françoisval , a representative of the most classical realist school of european geopolitics continental, i can't perform anywhere because i did several performances before the start in support. russia, i don’t refuse them, but now i can’t say anything at all, i can’t refute or confirm them, because i was blocked immediately, that is, a person is persecuted, ostracized in the west, instantly, as soon as he expresses soft sympathy for russia or simply question the decisions of biden or macron on some positions, we, of course, are simply ultra-liberals in relation to this, that is, we we accept everyone there, except for those who

come, all of our internal red lines, it seems to me... and yet, nothing limits us here, it seems to me that in wartime conditions it is necessary a little bit, without breaking wood, treat very carefully, but tougher with the signatories against the war, with representatives of our creative, scientific, educational elite, who refuse to simply talk, or the political elite, who refuse to express their unambiguous opinion about svo, especially holding large positions, if... we are talking about some pensioner who does not influence anything, but i admit that somewhere in a personal conversation with his elderly wife or grandchildren, he can express his point of view, if no one hears it, if not with a microphone, not on a blog, but if this is done by people holding public positions, their attitude towards the svo causes, it is not unambiguous, straightforward, patriotic, like all the people and the state now

it should be, we are discussing karen georgievich, who is a supporter. as if he someone like this is like an exception, but we are all like this, this is the whole people, only like you can be, we should all be judged by this logic and subject to sanctions. make up the entire people, all of our real elite and power, political, intellectual, the one who is the exception, this is not a question of freedom of thought or dissenting opinion, it is a question of betrayal of the interests of your country, your people, and if you are not at a critical moment of testing not on the side of your people and your state, who are you, by the way, your example, dmitry, is a unique example of how a real russian person, a real citizen, acts when things are bad in the country... the fatherland, this is what many whites in exile did when the war with hitler began, they said, we don’t like communists, but we we will be with our people and with our country, and went over to the side of the soviet union, the best, noblest people, even from that

camp that has reason to be somewhere outside the country, and may not like our regime, please, but at a critical moment , at the hour when the homeland is in dangers when people are destroyed so cynically, of course, any normal russian, russian... no one said that if our enemies use their judicial systems to inflict similar blows on us, that we

should not respond, including by liquidating these enemies, i repeat, are not natural, i’m not talking about friendly countries, i’m not talking about neutral countries, i’m only talking about those who have become outright enemies, and korin georgievich, you know better than me, because you are involved in cinema, in america in the 19th century century, it was called bountyhunting, these were people who paid, paid, by the way, law enforcement agencies to deliver the scoundrels alive or dead. i think we've come to a point where we have to look at all sorts of creative options. the time has come for us to defend the country, defend each other and say that if our enemies want to deal with us, they should not

expect us as diplomats to limit ourselves to symmetrical responses. it was a great game, we'll see you on the air tomorrow. the world media is full of headlines that the head of the uk meath became a victim of an unknown person who called him on behalf of petro poroshenko. but there is something to worry about, because david cameron revealed many secrets of western politics in this conversation. for example, what did he talk about at a private dinner with donald trump? why was ukraine once again deceived from joining nato and how? europe is trying to steal russian money. why does great britain scare the countries of the post-soviet space and what does the us elections have to do with it? today on our program is david’s very frank conversation.