our economy can live and well, in many different, including practical, senses of the word, because we have a rather difficult confrontation, an existential confrontation for us, and also for our opponents from nato, from the american-centric west, when we ask each other a question when this ends, we must understand that we have not even entered the toughest phase of this confrontation, it’s even where... it’s more of a stage of assessing each other. yes, there are very heavy battles, yes, at the front it sometimes seems, so to speak, like a branch of mada on the ground, but in fact, it is still necessary to understand that in a global sense this is still only such a mutual assessment of the real potential capabilities of the opponents. they evaluate us, no matter what they write in the press or speak at press conferences, they evaluate us, we evaluate them and... it depends on what

conclusions, how correct conclusions they draw about us, and we about them, and depends on how events will develop in many ways, because, well, how you assess your opponent, right, wrong, adequate, inadequate, a lot depends on your behavior, in the end result, precisely in this sense, in my opinion, despite the fact that, of course, a lot of fun and exciting things happen there, like at a children's party, but nevertheless for... me the nato summit, which is such a big deal today a big place in the current agenda, he occupies it justifiably precisely because looking at what is happening, listening to what these people say, trying to understand what is hidden behind these words, these statements, these puffed cheeks, this so to speak, rhetorical influence, in the halls meetings where the owners are sitting in the dressing rooms, where something like that is happening, their slaves are quacking... with which they

are fighting right here, looking at all this, we are trying and should try to understand the actual state of our current potential enemy, in principle, here - to this anniversary nato summit, seventy-five years old, they come in such a state that can be viewed, well, from different sides, on the one hand, it is still a very strong and powerful military-technical ... military bloc, on the other hand, this is a block, opportunities and the power that will break the back of anyone who opposes them, over the past two- plus years, well, let’s say, they have been called into question, not yet removed from the agenda, but they have been called into question, these are some external signs of what may be happening there, but i don’t know whether this is an erroneous impression or not, they can complement this picture with the fact that in general and

at the front they failed to break russia, to break it neither with 15 thousand sanctions, nor with the weapons that they give and so on, a certain external problem is added this decrepitude and not only the bloc and not so much the bloc, but the leader, today is grandfather biden, who, well, in theory, is such a, well, wedding general, if you consider this a wedding, but it’s true that they decided not to take the bride yet, the bride. somewhere else she’s sitting and waiting, they’ll take her, they won’t take her and they’ll either let her go in a circle, or something will happen to her, grandfather biden once again declared loudly about his powerfulness, he once again showed that he’s powerful , of course, the old man, because this is his pre-selected program, yesterday he stated that if he is elected for another 4 years, he will see them out to the end, not everyone will decide to do this, but a politician, yes, to say that you elect me and i will see it to the end is a powerful statement. for leadership, but today he

announced that there is one more point in his program, well, i don’t know, i would be upset if i were trump, because trump, biden said that he, well, actually, listen, what he said is very revealing. putin wants nothing less than to completely subjugate ukraine, to put an end to the ukrainian democracy, destroy the culture of uranus, uranus. yes, i understand, this is a reservation, of course, it is just a funny reservation, but you understand, when at such an event, speaking from a prompter, the person who heads the leading country, the strongest and richest in this bloc, makes such reservations, that is, he looks once again it’s a pity, giving us reasons to troll him, and so on and so forth, this inevitably raises the question, is the entire bloc in approximately... condition, given

the leadership of the leader, or is it just external side, everything is different inside, this is an important question for assessing our enemy. misha, stop it, don’t you think it’s time for her to tell the truth about her son, but she needs it, it’s the truth, but i hate them all, i can’t stand them. sometimes you have to shout about love to be heard. two shores, premiere

of the serial film, watch after the program time. this is a city whose coat of arms depicts the most powerful beast. we are in a nice city. we need a thin, thin straw, we are trying, but if you were 10 years old, you could join the corps of young cosmonauts, a child’s dream has come true, technology is something girls and women are quite capable of. let's go, the premiere is on saturday, on the first, you need to get married once and for all, i think you love me, oh,

on behalf of the peredaliks, hello, don't worry, have a fun wedding. the condition is serious, the spine is hurt, everything will be fine, die, take it away, kollekko, now you can understand this, hello, seryozha, why did you let her in, mom, we don’t need guests, be a man, be a man, free her, like you do you think if i... yes, just think for yourself, i can’t say goodbye, on saturday at the first, leather coat, hat, wide gait, this is klyuev, this is klyuev, of course, that i’m a dude, we are from

the state security committee, do all the objects in the room belong to you, 575 horses, it’s called herd, called dad, a wonderful artist who left a big mark on the stage of theater and cinema, on the eightieth anniversary of the birth of boris klyuev, on saturday at the first, i didn’t learn to rest, when i tried to do this, i

almost went crazy, you’re bored you will, well, how will i. don't forget your hat, it's cold there, goodbye, thank you very much, everything was very tasty, come on, that's it, come on, bye, see you in touch, well, we inspected the attics, the roofs, everything was clean, the owner of the taxi says that she had no conflicts, no one threatened, got tired of the variniki, missed the poplov. and in our yard on sunday on the first, and you know how we met him, we had a train in the septic tank, well, i was there, while i was collecting bed linen, he fell into a hollow, drunk, not standing on his feet, he looks at me with his eyes, let's go to tashkent,

let's go to tashkent, i say, men, what a tashkent, we are at the kiev station. time will tell the program, we continue to work live . so, the nato summit, and the 75th anniversary summit, washington. the same summit, the expectations for which a year ago, against the backdrop of the vilnius summit, were very high, but because at that time it was not yet clear how the ukrainian offensive would end, and, well, it seems like over a year there was something there, and i remember these are the moods that, well, in a year, something like that, they’re right there, well, for their seventy-fifth birthday, they built something there, a year has passed, what is the state of biden, well, we already... talked at the beginning, but still nato is in many ways the united states, but not only the united states, and especially not only

biden, but what else can be said and what conclusions can be drawn looking at how this summit is going, and in general, by the way, is it necessary to draw any conclusions about the state of the bloc, and the state of minds, moods and prospects, given that well, in general, this is quite a formal, albeit pretentious, event. i... don't know what words to say again ukraine, that they will not take it, but it is approaching nato. let me remind you that the svo began

after repeated warnings that there was no need to bring ukraine closer to nato, because there would be a tough military technical response. everyone sitting in this room understands perfectly well that the talk about ukraine’s approach to nato is not so that the idiot zelensky does not babble, it is not so that the idiot kuleba blabs something like that.

and they themselves decide or do not solve some of their problems, but something more indicative is that even regarding the victory over russia, they have no unity even at the level of statements, which probably indicates that they have no understanding at all of where they are regarding the victory over russia, here’s the same stoltenberg talking about this. the biggest threat to nato would be a russian victory in ukraine.

i know how to end the war, if we stop supporting ukraine, the war will quickly end because ukraine cannot

defend itself without our support. we certainly regret that people are dying, but ukrainian soldiers are fighting and dying because they are defending their country. somehow he himself in my opinion, he is confused about who they are defending, for whom they are dying and for what they are dying, although, of course, he is very sad, but also like let them fight and die, but what is important here, what... from fixes that ukraine itself can’t do anything, that is, it actually confirms our thesis that on the battlefield we are also fighting nato, without nato there is no military conflict, and it would be impossible.

especially with our full and collective support, let no one be mistaken, russia is losing in this war. that is , people who are in a slightly more sane state condition, they somehow neatly say, well, you know, if russia wins, it won’t be very good, the moralist says: russia is losing this war, which is also quite indicative of what is going on. he, well, has already won, as it were, over ukraine, since russia is losing, what is grandfather going to provide to it, this is what they really expected from the summit in ukraine, understanding that there will be no membership, but even yesterday i quoted some figure from the rada, who says: we all understand that we will not be accepted into nato, the question is, what will we get in return, well, that is,

what will they get in return, listen, today i am announcing... the historic transfer of air defense equipment for ukraine. the united states, germany, the netherlands, romania and italy will provide ukraine with equipment for five additional strategic defense systems; in the coming months, our us partners intend to provide ukraine with dozens of additional tactical air defense systems. again, yes, this is an event at which all statements sound loudly pathetic, but in fact, like me i understand, maybe i don’t understand everything. well , five air defense systems are better than not a single air defense system, but this is nothing against the backdrop of a conflict in such a territory, taking into account the density of mining in this territory, again it is not clear whether the grandfather is selling air, or the grandfather no longer understands anything, or he expects that they don’t understand anything here anymore and will be happy with everything, because they’ve been begging for a very long time? this is

an important question, but again here we are dealing with a senile person, here is a statement from whom... and this is to an expert, an analyst, probably, first of all, a military analyst, although not only, since the us secretary of state speaks, he really speaks at a formal anniversary event, but he speaks about airplanes and not in the conditional future tense in the subjunctive mood, that’s how... i’m glad to announce that the transfer of f-16 fighters from denmark and the netherlands, and these fighters will fly in the ukrainian skies this summer. like this. here, in fact, is the question that i have already asked, from what is happening there, what is being said, what is being said, and so on, how can we evaluate and is it generally worth should we assess the state of nato and the prospects

for nato, well, against this background, here is this statement, because for the first time concrete ones are being made. deadlines until the end of the summer, i remind everyone, today is july 10, there are literally just 52 days left until the end of the summer, and he says that in the skies over ukraine, that is, not somewhere out there, there will be a training mission in romania, in the skies over ukraine there will be f-16 within 52 days. i'll start with stoltenberg, who said that the outcome of this conflict will determine the future, this is really so, one cannot but agree with him, this is really so, because what. the xir countries, china, north korea, which means iran, russia, how they actually united us into one bloc, really oppose the collective west, 32 nato countries, everything is fine, the whole other global south, which is not part of any of these blocs, which they call countries at a crossroads, they are watching this conflict , they understand how the future will really be built, nato will turn into

a global hegemon, that is where they are striving, i remind you that nato has already decided that... up to 300, that the countries of europe are already transit for the movement of nato troops, the so-called military schengen, that nato will expand, although we see, he says, no, in no case will nato go to the southeast, the asia-pacific region will not go, that’s exactly what they won’t do it, here miley in argentina already said that i want to join nato, well, my dear, although he is young, he is also a morasmatic person, in my opinion, he is still the same, nevertheless we will understand. the americans are building a global policeman who will control the country so as not to only they had the financial burden of intimidating the country into resolving its economic interests, and this, by the way, always happens.

a fight in their understanding, a big big offensive means in the ukrainian theater of military operations before the elections means before the main us elections,

airplanes are being transferred for this purpose, personal weapons are now being transferred for this purpose to 14 brigades zelensky, which zelensky has now folded into a heap, and these are just two army corps, exactly 70,000 were then preparing to target the takmak nuts with precision. to happen, this is the only fork in the road, these actions will begin during the olympics or after or they will not focus on it at all, but it was just planned after the nato summit, because here they must

reactivate their warehouses with air defense systems, because they need a separate theater of combat actions to isolate from our aviation, the main thing they cannot take is our large -caliber gliding bombs, they really can’t do anything about it, they are trying to separate the complexes. launchers with commands bring vehicles to the front line, we destroy them there, you just said today, again there are many or few complexes, and complexes with a radius of 180 km, here we present a map of ukraine, how many points are 180 km each, where to place them around kiev or somewhere it’s not, it ’s really very difficult to cover very small airfields, why f16 aircraft, because they themselves perform a function , including air defense, they are lifted into the air and air-to-air missiles from external target designation radars. long-range radar aircraft detection, they feel the destruction of targets, as by the way, it was around israel when iran struck, the planes actually circled there in different directions, identified targets,

launched strikes, but they won’t have an easy walk, to really have an impact, these need numbers that will be measured in hundreds, that is, 200 aircraft, so that there are and so on, and the complexes should be in the same quantity, because it should be at least comparable to us, here. it's about hundreds of each unit, so create isolated some sector in which they will go, remember, when there was an offensive, even before the offensive in the spring of last year, i told you that the americans were working out the technology for the offensive of heavy breakthrough divisions, that they had a concept before the year twenty-seven, what if they fight with russia or china, layered defense, but without the use of nuclear weapons, how to overcome it, so a massive strike, helicopters hover in the air, destroy everything that rises, then cars come...

together, but we have also changed over the year, and we have already studied their weak and strong points, and we also act differently, so, well, about us, well, firstly, to the fact that now they have him there he said that they were transmitting, who is the netherlands, someone else is transmitting there, he did not say how many planes, well, most likely they are talking about, there are 14 planes, 14 planes that will be in the sky, however, belgian, that means an activist, immediately, he said that the prime minister of belgium stated that belgium does not allow ukraine use f-16 fighters outside the country, i didn’t really understand right away, but he didn’t

explain. the plane cannot be used outside the country, this means it cannot fly beyond its borders, or the missiles it uses cannot operate outside the country, this is not yet clear, but about us, i remind everyone, i reminded myself today, i checked myself, wrote about it in a telegram, when the news about blinkin appeared in my home, i wrote that it is clear that we will not react to statements, but to practical actions.

and so on, it seems to me that out of everything that i see so far at the nato summit, the only thing that can be discussed, really seriously from the point of view of the military confrontation with this bloc, is this. there are two points here that i want to draw attention to, the escalation they are pursuing, well, in some part , does not frighten us to a certain extent, that is, if we listen to what orban says, he openly says that i agreed rutte has only one thing.

or is he still such a figure who can do this in game mode to bluff, watch our reaction, check whether we ourselves remember what we said in may, how we will react, or we will say, well, that’s for now... forced to take a walk where there is no need to walk. blinkin's words today, i would take them seriously for one simple reason: they don't need f-16s for the sake of f-16s. this is purely diplomatic blackmail. oh, he's blackmailing us. and he talks about the second thing very

diplomatically. diplomatically for now. the second thing is the transition to the so-called terrorist war. what americans don’t like to talk about, but they now talk about it on almost every talk show. they write about it.

today they are working on several things to make russia a nuclear aggressor, and to use russia’s nuclear aggression to destroy brix, destroy the highway, and make sure that the same xir that exists today ceases to exist. i ’ll give you a simple example, there are a lot of sanctions against iran, a lot, so any person who was in tehran, at the airport, head like that raise the board, flight to new york, flight to paris, flight to london, nothing bothers you, yeah, there are a lot of them at our airports too. signs and sanctions are so good, it’s me or somehow they play by double, triple, quadruple standards, of course, why can you fly from tehran to paris directly, and they tell you: iran is from chadya hell, this is horror, from russia, no, yes, and russia

is even worse in this regard, well, let me answer you as the devil's advocate, what will they tell you about this, but because iran can attack on israel, but has not yet attacked, they seem to be holding it everywhere, and russia, from their point of view...

was now staring at the anniversary summit, if we send troops now, if we make a breakthrough such as we have never made, at least we someone will fly in, they all smile in washington and say: the entire area of ​​responsibility will be here, they will fly in, that is, by and large , all the experts that exist are the same most harmful rend corporation, they say: listen, we understand that the russians should beat exclusively regarding ukraine, we give weapons, we can say as much as we want that it is a party to the conflict. and legally they are a party to the conflict, of course, but, by the way, regarding the fact that legally they are a party to the conflict, and the main thing is that even the people here - idiots - understand this, when i said that there are adults sitting there, that means in in the meeting room, it’s like serfs

are clowns, that means in the waiting room, but in the waiting room they also gather around them people with reduced social activity, and perform in front of them, what a moron, that means kyiv spoke. the problem with the f-16 is numbers and dates. let's be honest, we had a solution with the f-16. russia uses 300 aircraft against ukraine every day. they have more, but they use 300. we had a solution of 10-20. even if we had 50, it’s nothing. they have three hundred. we are defending ourselves, so we need 128 aircraft. our partners have all these figures. until we have 128 aircraft, we will not be able to compete with them in the skies. in any case, it will be difficult. understand yes to to the question of what they say about some

few in the sky in 52 days, this one says in advance that no, no, no, this 10-20 and even 50 doesn’t work, that is, if you want to achieve something , then it’s like 128 minimum and like further think, yes, he says this unofficially, because he is in the dressing room and he is not a member of nato, and certainly not the brain of nato, and he was not invited there, and he says this at a certain ronald reagan institute.

borders from 150 km to a thousand, but in most, which is very important, this zone is from 150 to 500 km, which means that if we to have these weapons and we already have something, we will be able to use them on russian territory, especially in relation to these objects, if we can do this, then of course we will be able to protect civilians, hospitals, schools, children, we can do this, now look, regarding blackmail, overton windows, bluffs, non-bluffs, and so on. kievsky speaks unofficially at a certain reagan institute and

certain people gathered there who really like what he says, they really clap for him very unanimously, now i ask what he says and proposes all this, and some people present there clap and sympathize with this, from this moment until the moment of making certain decisions, given that you understand how this all works, the distances are enormous. as a classic wrote or not, because in fact he proposes to start a war, well, in general, a nuclear one, because a strike on military airfields of the russian federation at a distance of 500 and even more so 1,000 km from the border with nato weapons, well , it seems to me that even the most important ones are here lovers of red lines that are then erased, well they won’t be able to pretend that it’s nonsense, we’re still going according to plan, vladikovich, but the justification is very simple, everything needs to be done. in order for any victory scenario to be worked out before

september 5, that is, from september 5 it will be absolutely absolutely correct, these 2 months before the elections, they must come with a certain gain, that is, on a plate, with a blue cot, something is needed show exactly what andrei was talking about, these are the time limits, but now there is practically no solution if they are voiced in connected states of america, in terms of permission, have a multi-stage decision-making system.

with the applause behind the scenes and his wishes and wet dreams, or the fact that he says this, it can, can somehow fit into...

so i’m asking you about this, after all, this is an animal , which speaks to experts, analysts, or is it an animal that speaks with superimposed laughter in order to give someone in the media a basis for some, this is a fundamentally important question, here is a very important point, if these were serious analysts, they would have gathered at a small round table, with a maximum of 10-15 people, and said, my friend, tell me, well, just tell me how ready you are, what you will lead us to, that would be serious, when those who are sitting are sitting. there will be two or three good analysts sitting there, they will look at it for a long time, that is, we should not react to this yet, do not react, this was done exclusively for a litmus test, then the media will drive it away, the americans will say: look, how good idea, let's take our congressmen and say, you know, america approves, america supports, we recently conducted a public opinion survey,

everyone says, listen, it's a good idea, besides, it needs to be a point, a point to an analytical center, when you say it means someone needs it. in america, so that there is such a point, so that there is such a media support, that is, there are people who, knowing that he will say this or something like this, promote it, this is the most important thing, these are the people who within the biden team do not want him re-election, because these are the rats that are drowning him, yeah, it’s interesting, again everything revolves around addiction, but here ’s the question, it’s very good that you trashed this institute regina, i’m talking about this when i’m at home today wrote, that is, on the one hand, he says monstrous things, someone claps there. another one, i’ve already lost count,

to be honest, i haven’t yet remembered what this british prime minister’s name is, the last name, in my opinion, is starmer, starver, starmer, you never know in brazil. pedorov, we’ll just get used to it, this one too, i didn’t have time to remember his last name, but he’s already saying this. keir starmer has hinted that ukraine could use british stormshadow missiles to strike military targets in russia, confirming he would continue the policies of the previous uk government. the missiles must be used in accordance with international humanitarian law. for defensive purposes, but ukraine itself must decide how to use them, so i have a question accordingly: after all, this is the nezel who sits in in a not very clear institution, with not very clear people and so on, this is the prime minister of a nuclear power that is part of nato, which is a special, special partner of the united states

of america, and he says this. now the question is, he says this because he has not yet really understood at all where he finds himself and what responsibility he has, and there is a certain in, there is... a certain inertia, or in your opinion, is this a manifestation of the fact that nato is really is gaining some, some energy for the next level of escalation, which i described here andrei klintsevich is quite vivid, here’s how to relate to this, how to react to it, how to perceive it, i think andrei is absolutely true and also, firstly, in the american you are like, i don’t really remember, as an americanist, there is the concept of november . before the elections, how they have a syndrome or something starts, they don’t necessarily organize some kind of event before the elections in favor of one candidate or another, i’m talking about the possibility of everything else happening, yes, that is, they have this concept in the political spectrum , what before the elections, what the last step, when there is agitation to do something in favor of a certain thing, what they call a rally, well, yes, but

about our starmer, who said, well , yes, okay, i noticed. on one thing: humanitarian law, international humanitarian law, i just want to remember where the concept of humanitarian wars came from, it appeared after the iraq war of desert storm, when the americans created a humanitarian catastrophe in the north of iraq, in fact, then they sent troops to the north of iraq and they said it was good humanistic creation of protection there, we have the right to fight, that is, it was codified at the level of action auto this concept was such robert huney, an american journalist, he was in somalia, he was in yugoslavia during the war, an undercover intelligence officer, we know these journalists . journalist, his head was publicly cut off when he arrived in afghanistan, that is, the taliban

cut it off in front of the camera and showed it to the americans, we know why he came here, because he always came where wars began, that is, for us in yugoslavia, for example, he when sarajevo was besieged there and these snipers did not allow them to approach the water, they had to surrender, suddenly an american journalist says that there have been catacombs under sarajevo since the times of the roman empire, where there is water, which...

will be a member of nato, we now agree, i don’t i want to warn you, but we are currently agreeing on the final text, which, well, is a statement that will happen, so i won’t, but what does ukraine mean in nato, it means war to the bitter end, because for russia this is an unacceptable option, moreover, we remember that ukraine, like ukraine, is the budapest agreement or there is a consensus, but there a neutral status is prescribed, that is, there is no neutral status, there are no budapest agreements, there is no ukraine. well, look at exactly what you are talking about now, sijart, in general sijart , last week, this week, well

, it seemed that something like that, some kind of drive appeared in hungarian politics, i don’t know, just is it a hungarian drive or is it some kind of symbiosis of different drives from different shores of the ocean, well, listen, siyart exactly on this occasion, nato is trying to describe ukraine’s rapprochement with nato in such a way that all... thinking people know that the country’s membership in the alliance is simply out of the question. if ukraine were accepted into nato, we would practically live under the constant open and extremely dangerous threat of war, since ukraine's membership in nato would foreshadow direct confrontation between nato and russia. it was foreshadowed, this means their question, but now the question, szijarta understands this from what orban is doing, it is clear that hungary doesn't want to go there. but now the question is: the rest of the stoltenbergs, the starmers. the bidens, the schmaidens and so on, they understand this and only puff out their cheeks that they will bring it closer,

risking it, or do they really go for it consciously, realizing that from the series they have the option of a terrorist war, there is nuclear blackmail, and so on , that’s what we need to understand, their real message, not words, but a message, well, there is such a strong brake as nuclear parity, yes nuclear... they benefit from the continuation of the war of bloodshed, because hatred of the russians not only in ukraine, but also in europe, it provokes a further split in well, cutting off

russia, as they say, from the civilized world, yes, so yes, for them it is fundamentally important that this war continues, for them, well, there is that same logic , i can’t get into their heads, of course, that what you outline, these step-by-step ones, they really constantly step over the lines, which, if you remember what it started with, and the statement, anyone who intervenes in this war... i our president , i quote, will be harmed by incompatibility with his statehood, yes, well, we see that a lot of countries have already become involved and the militants are fighting and supplying weapons, that is, when the aggressor does not receive an answer, a tough answer, well, i always formulate this, impunity gives rise to a feeling of permissiveness, they move along this path, but they push this aside that same market is a world of rules that speaks against us, which means a world, a world based on rules, and a world based on these rules all the time.

in this warlike story, how realistic, negotiation-diplomatic, summit and so on, it also exists, even by the way, inside nato against the backdrop of this summit, now we’ll talk about it, how to treat it, what are its prospects, a short advertisement, don’t switch gears, we’ve had so many events, well at most they will break dishes, break furniture, punch each other in the face to kill, beautiful. work, guys, work, lusch, but it’s true that you dreamed of a dragon with three heads, but not with three, with two and not heads, but with faces, i don’t understand what’s happening, we’re working, fortune teller, today on first, you and nadya argue constantly, i rush at me like, we’ll survive,

i think i have someone. gin сnop product of stellar group, cognac monte shococa, product of stellar group, rom kastro, product of stellar group, pechora vodka, product of stellar group, vodka veda, product. this, friends, is how the brain works, this is how, in the literal sense of the word, sleeping pills turn it off. why does addiction develop to sleeping pills, like those who have trouble sleeping? we will answer this and other questions in the live healthy program, tomorrow on the first. my real name is me

i won’t call them. “do you remember rudolf abel, my friend, we worked together during the war, the center knows that we were friends, you will smile elsewhere, colonel, i will call myself rudolf abel, then they will understand that i, rudolf ivanovich abel, have been arrested , citizen of the ussr, he is an illegal resident throughout america, put pressure on him, scare him, information on atomic weapons, you face the death penalty, silence will not help, the only way out is to start cooperating with us, hear me, you can think whatever you want, but we have to save you, you are in prison if they kill you, my beloved, they won’t succeed, they won’t break you, then tell your superiors that i was terribly scared, we agreed, for the birthday of the legendary

intelligence officer, the us government. against rudolf abel on saturday in the first, it seems to me that this is not a sin, because this is love. the great vera vasilyeva, already at 25, had two stalin prizes, the girl with dimples was adored in the ussr, she turned into the queen of the satire theater, she went and played, and was dressed up, i was taken aback when she walked in with heels and shoes after.

gifts, gifts, gifts, who will now have the incredible inheritance of the great vasilyeva, who will get her jewelry, we lay out these jewelry so that everyone chooses what they want. i want, our exclusive, the last interview is the last will of the great vera vasilyeva, exclusive with dmitry borisov, on saturday on the first, in the new season on the first, a woman was killed, and we are talking about the devil and our hearts didn’t break, do you know how she is it’s torn, so only the shoulder gives away and the elbow pulls, well, okay, let’s think about it, let’s say you have moles? are you in search, there are targets for you in all parts of the soviet union, and no matter how good your preparation is, sooner or later you will still be identified, and this is a mortal danger, or you have a second very

well thought out option of escaping abroad, well of course, i would run in to pick out the moles, that's the question, be careful, i'm always careful, major. hello, colonel kostenko. the confrontation of the prime minister based on the legendary book by yulian semyonov. time will tell the program,

we continue to work live. an interesting story that actually discusses today's world realities. we must admit that there is more than one of these realities, there are at least several of them, sometimes they seem to be parallel, perhaps this is where some conspiracy theories, scammers, contract brokers and so on and so forth are born, i don’t know, is this so, or in general, big politics is structured in such a way that seemingly incompatible things can exist in parallel in it, on the one hand, everything that we talked about in the first part programs, nato summit, plane.

new peace negotiations will take place between ukraine and russia by the end of the year. europe must come up with a peace initiative without waiting for the us, because in the next 2 months the situation on the battlefield will be more dramatic than ever. during a trip to china, i discussed with xijen ping possible scenarios for the development of the conflict after the us presidential elections. the new administration will be expected to achieve quick political results even before taking office. but the chinese leader did not comments on the possibility of such a scenario. you know, rockets.

moreover, not only orban speaks about this, kuleba, the minister of foreign affairs, well, the acting minister of foreign affairs, speaks about this, they are all not real there now in ukrorekh, but nevertheless, kuleba of all kuleba, please, met with my hungarian colleague peter szijjártó, i informed petór about the situation on the front line, as well as preparations for the second peace summit, what is this, what is this about? are these some?

future president, because what now happens, america is not unified, not monolithic, there are deep states , transnational corporations, military-industrial complexes that control the white house. who expect to win the presidential race, who expect to earn trillions of dollars in armaments in 2026 to 2020, supplying them to europe and other countries, perhaps some small conflict in their understanding that will not affect the territory of the united states will happen there, that’s all meets their interests. trump is different design, this focus on interests within america, these are other groups, and orbán represents his interest, but i want to recall the words of orbán when he spoke about the '.

in an operational movement that constrains such a movement at the front, its task is to hold the front line until the twenty-fifth year, and nato military analysts say that in the year 25 we reach parity in military industrial products with russia, and in the year 26, we are ahead of it, from the point of view of mathematics this is perhaps because they really have a collective nato, after all there are more resources there in terms of people and money and everything else, right now nato military experts said, listen to... there is

a fifth article, yes, but what does it say? that we will begin the procedure, if someone hits us, we will begin to consult on what to do, let’s imagine that the russians have already struck, let’s immediately write down what we are doing, who is going where, who is taking what, that is, they they are already preparing for this, why? yes, because they understand that we are constantly provoked, sooner or later we responded, because like the world it looks like, relatively speaking, the americans hit the iranian general sulaymaniyah, iran said, we will respond, oops, after some time they hit the americans. the world ticked the box, look, the guys said, they did it, so, israel struck, ran said, we will strike, it doesn’t matter there without losses, neatly, but the tick was delivered, in this situation we need to carefully show that pushing the red lines constantly it’s impossible, britain acts in this regard as well as possible, well, as an intermediate stage in order to not immediately hit the americans, but means british base. i don’t know in cyprus

, there’s a random rocket from syria, ours will fly and land somewhere, well, it also seems normal, who launched it, it’s not clear, some guys there pierced the system, well, in general, if i understand correctly, i even i published this on my telegram some time ago, a long time ago, in my opinion, under sakharov , a concept was developed that even you need to hit not at britain, but somewhere in the north sea, and you need to throw dozens of these tons there, having formed it. washing away coastal cities, all american british industry is on the shores, posidon, in fact, is his brainchild, which was later embodied in metal, moreover, remember when you and i were there where lancets are made, but very curious people told us, i just forgot how... how it

’s called, you should have it saved somewhere, but now you keep talking, and i ’ll look for it, i don’t even know what it means, we said something there, so what, what if we have the same person there something he stood aside, like methane hydrates in the gulf of mexico, like methane hydrates, hydrates, a man just calmly stood somewhere in the country and listened to what we were saying, then he said guys, neutral waters, methane hydrates in the gulf of mexico, and so he fell silent, and we were like, he says, well , they know that they know what's there.

therefore, the most possible option is the capitulation of the kiev regime, this is more realistic, you said it interestingly, i thought you would say now, the most realistic option is that aliens will arrive.

to save people, the state, we are not a member of the understanding that first of all we need nato, we don’t have such an umbrella, so we when you talk about territories, you need putin to lose, we don’t want him to be on our territory, because in any case then it’s a frozen conflict, then for several years he will prepare and come back again, he will do it, well, as i understand it, he slowly left the borders of the ninety-first year.

god willing, or maybe god willing, they find out what war is, they will change their behavior for a long time, but also negotiations, american patronage, and so on and so forth, like these two tracks generally intersect, this is a very simple track, let’s imagine, we keep talking about 32 nato countries, just like a metaphor definition, imagine that half of them were invited to play hockey,

others play football, and the third are golfers, so they were gathered 32 of these super players, some are just powerful hockey players, others are football players, others are golfers, they are told: listen, now we have... the fifth article of nato, then we are transported 10 years ago to turkey, when turkey thought, when there were attacks in turkey, we remember these were against erdogan sent, all newspapers wrote that turkey would now apply the fifth article of nato. i remember the reaction in the media, how many, primarily european countries, said: “we don’t need this, we don’t need a word at all, so america will say, let america fight.” when the hungarian prime minister now talks about the need to somehow establish peace, he speaks. about himself, he is an egoist, and he is an egoist, in the good sense of the word, he is, of course, not a negative egoist, he says that trump will come, money will be given exclusively for maintaining of this fire, the main money will be collected by europe, europe will become the main

player if trump wins, and trump does not hide it, he says, guys, i will bring you all to your knees, and you will all pay for what we need, taking into account what you have already said, and many have done. they say: listen, we, we are in nato, but the fifth article is not about us, all the decisions that are made, we were behind closed doors, you came up with this idea that if you need to vote with us, we are asked to leave the room , this is a good story about hungary, and you know, how a bad example is contagious, the small countries of europe are now just talking about it: listen,

if a real clash starts, maybe we will also leave the room where the decisions will be made, but these are small, this is what not to the emirates, these countries, which are now supplying as...

may not see that everything in this world is already pumping up the military industry, but they are not based on rules, it’s not going quite as they imagined, and on the basis of what they themselves have been leading in recent years, because from what struck me, we always consider the military components, that is , we talk all the time, this is understandable, these are global conflicts, these are different rules, different architecture, in general, financial, and so on and so forth, but we still discuss the military there industry, military operations, and so on, here’s a different story for you. front, which at first glance is not connected with this, in my opinion, is directly connected, saudi arabia, a recent ally of the united states

of america, suddenly makes a statement, or rather hints, bloomberg writes about this, that if the big seven continues to seize russian assets, they may sell european debts, in my opinion, this is true. into the same picture that the world, based on the idea of ​​which and their place in it, they behave the way they do, it may no longer be like that. this statement from saudi arabia also shows this, well, the hint that bloomberg writes about, it is clear that all this is so very vague and so on. and their reaction to mode’s visit to russia, a kind of surprise, was not understood, but what happened to isolation and so on and so forth. maybe we have more to do with this. pay attention than to a purely military track from the point of view of why they might really need

negotiations, well, peripheral news is often more important than military news, here you are absolutely right, if we return to orban, i drew attention from those personnel, in addition to hermetocracy, which you paid attention to, orban in all the frames, he stands at the very edge, like this, that is, he has contempt for everything that is happening, or a misunderstanding of the meaning, or he wants to pull away, that is. this says more than statements of words, because words, they are always diplomatic, here a person simply cannot restrain himself, here he is, this is all, it ’s unpleasant for him, where you showed the footage, when biden comes out, when he stands right there in the corner just like that, look at him right now, here’s the big one, when he shows the general one, also on the right, he also puts his head up, you see now he’s dadada, he doesn’t accept, that’s what, to besides that

i have already cited it, there is a brilliant book, by an organ author, called the accounting of war, so they tell, they describe

mainly two authors there, that the cause of wars is not a violation of collective forms of security, when one dominant power tries to maintain its positions, there are instead she has another contender for dominance, well , in this case, it’s clear china, yes, yeah, they say that they write about it, they prove that victory in the war is the sky. actions, what you just said is not specific, and which project, whose national project, the state one, will receive expansion after this, they say that nuclear parity does not change these principles, because the defeat of the soviet union in the cold war, no matter how they said it, the defeat led to , that we accepted someone else’s format of relations, that is, they expanded their zone of influence, we curtailed ours, it was a defeat, they say that you cannot judge the war, that’s what he said, yes, that this is first of all .. . competition, as it is called, political mobilization, in my opinion, the ability of a nation

to concentrate on achieving goals is what determines victory, not combat resources, not only there, everywhere in the rear. this is what you said, by the way, about methane hydrants, since i work a little on hydrocarbons, i can say that these are methane reserves compressed to the level of ice, which are located at depth, if you explode them, well, imagine, yes, if the methane begins to bubble and there will be colossal emissions, the interlocutor said, so in my opinion, let that model remove the corporate world that was imposed on us, yes, political peace is returning.

of that parallel reality that is replacing the previous one, how this world will look, where america will be forced to collapse, to what extent it will collapse its zone of influence, it is clear that the backyard of latin america, it is fundamentally important for them to keep europe in theirs, because only in this optionally , i’ll milk it by holding it or hold it by holding it, for them it’s the same thing for the americans, because they’ve always acted that way, well, actually. friends, this is just a small incident to understand what is really happening, at the heart of this, of course, is the war on the battlefield, but you understand what this confrontation is really about, what the stakes are in this war, but what will happen, time will tell, but for now advertising, you just like you became a stranger, well, you

’re not my own, there’s nothing connecting us with you. lyoshka, he scared me, how grateful i am to you, for the pies, why did you marry him? misha, stop it, don’t you think it’s time for her to tell the truth about her son, but she needs this truth, but i hate them all, i can’t stand the breath. sometimes you have to shout about love to you were heard. two shores, the premiere of the serial film, watch after. program time. this, friends, is how the brain works, this is how, in the literal sense of the word, sleeping pills turn it off. why addiction develops to sleeping pills, as if for those who have trouble sleeping. we will answer this and other questions in the program to live healthy.

tomorrow on the first. i need to get married once and for all, i think you love me, oh, and you’re a leader, i’m a loser, i’m a loser, a fun wedding, a serious condition, my spine is hurt, everything will be fine, miles, eh... guests, be a man, be a man, free her, what do you think, if i, and this is you, think for yourself, i can’t why did you let her in, mom, we don’t need to be told, goodbye, on saturday in the first place, a leather

cloak. hello, my boy, one hundred percent fit into the character, any role where boris vladimirovich appeared, i believe that this was a decoration for any movie, we had the full feeling that we were an ordinary family, this is a loss, the loss of the head of the family, that we everyone called him dad, a wonderful artist who left a big mark on the stage of theater and cinema, to

the eightieth anniversary of the birth of boris klyuev, on saturday. first, i didn’t learn to rest, when i tried to do this, i almost went crazy, in our studio there are artists like... who gave their voices to their favorite characters, go ahead, if he has a mustache, kostya raikin only agreed to star in this film because i did the voice acting, i tried to act in a way that would fit comfortably in the frame. vanya, i am yours forever, i myself didn’t know that it was me, yes, it ’s not me, i refused, then i realized, yes, that it was me, but it was a very, very long time ago, tell me something in that beautiful voice, you don’t have enough money to call, i voiced the cars, i made a big deal. chick of spectacles, i call me, call me, i have so much speed, children will immediately recognize me by this, quail, but everyone knows that i just call

me call me, well, because it’s brilliant, just recover from the shock, and then answer to my question, of course, only i can do this, no one else, the route has been built, don’t forget to give us a rating in the app, i arrive somehow in secret. there was nothing more to be done, go ask everyone if you’ve been to nataite, tonight with nikolai siskaridze at the first one, you’ll be bored, well, i’ll be there, don’t forget your hat, it’s cold there, goodbye, thank you very much, everything was very tasty, cheers, come on! well, that's it, bye, before we get in touch, well, we inspected the attics, the roofs, everything is clean, the owner of the taxi says that

she had no conflicts, no one threatened, that varenik was tired, the poplov fell off, and we have courtyard on sunday on the first. today, when we talked about those difficult global events that are taking place in the world, a phrase was said: that this process or these processes, among other things, they demonstrate or test the will of nations to resist, their readiness to resist, strengthen, unite, and of course, on this path, each a nation that is capable of this... every nation that is ready for this, its own symbols appear. for us, magomed

nurbagandov became such a symbol, today is 8 years from the day when he uttered the last words in his life, work, brothers, and... now these words familiar to each of those who fight for our homeland, for our country, for our understanding of who we should be, and die, just the other day the guys from the front wrote to me that the commander of one of the moscow regiments, mobilized with the call sign phoenix, died, because how many people wrote to me, he was a worthy man, an officer, eternal memory to him, and his

comrades, now in memory of him and of all their dead, will move forward with the words that magomed left us all, work, liars!

anya, are you sleeping or something, i'm bored. rum, grab your boob.

is marina already there? marinach is there, where have you been? squirrel in the park stern, what are you doing, i even came earlier, but what happened? a woman was killed at a corporate party in a boarding house. come with us, there is a forest, we will work, you will feed the squirrels. mom, there’s a car just like

uncle max’s, you never know how many cars like that in moscow, let’s go, it’s his car, you thought, let ’s go, come on, let’s be late. hello, antonina sergeevna, hello, antonina sergeevna, hello, so run , that's it, bye, bye, goodbye, goodbye.