sign here, i fully admit my guilt, i wanted to kill and it’s a pity if i didn’t finish the shot, you think that’s what you’re talking about, right, you don’t throw around words like that? my advice to you: tell him that he didn’t remember himself, he recognized himself, he caught fire like a match, we couldn’t hold him, so tell him how much he faces, if skolshchin dies, then 15 years, otherwise the tower, but skolshchin should be judged for murder and arson. write a statement, if

you prove that he is guilty, then mikhail zakharovich, you will get a lighter sentence, write, write, son, hello, i want to know how it’s going consequence. “my son is sitting in a pre-trial detention center, and you are still marking time, your son, he admitted to attempted murder, there are witnesses, so from our side everything is clear, the case has been transferred to court. wait, as in court, but according to our statement , when will you look into it? the prosecutor’s office refused to initiate a criminal case against kolchin. that is, how did he refuse? he killed a woman and set the house on fire. ” not enough, oh, well

, she told everything in such detail, well, the girl was sick, delirious, with a high temperature, well, who will figure out what she really saw there and what she fantasized about, well, think for yourself how you can build accusations on such testimony. “could you, varvara, as a deputy, help so that a case is opened against denis, for attempted murder, with denis’s kolchin, ermakov and mikhail zakharovich are sentenced to 5 years in prison, how is this so, conditionally, taking into account mitigating circumstances and the state of a strong ".

and there we will settle accounts with ermak, not without me and i will not return, like this, like this, work in the city i’ll find it, it wasn’t enough for this molochol to finish shooting me to the end, they didn’t put him in prison, well, yes, i understand you, only...

it will be hard for me, son, of course, you hear, but tanka keeps talking about me, people believe, but no, since the case was not opened, it means the investigator did not believe her, that’s all the demand, but what do you care about people, today they will lie, and tomorrow they will forget, that’s true. you’re thinking right, avarka, i’ll go, come in, hello, the main thing is to get better, son, yes, come on, i cooked you a chicken here, eggs, here’s some broth have a drink. zoyka, will you go to the city with me? well

, get over it, i won’t get married. but i don’t care, marriage is a mischievous prejudice, that’s how i like you, zoyka, zoyka, you called, you called, yes. what are you doing, ermakov, you are disgracing the party,

there cannot be criminal elements in our ranks, you want to say by the resolution of the district committee bureau, you are expelled from the ranks of the cpsu. on the table, that's it, i can go, from the management of the collective farm, we are also removing you, today you will be taken to an extraordinary meeting and elect a new chairman. now that's it, that's it, go, nowhere to go me.

what's wrong with you, you feel bad, man, be patient, there's a special analytical edition of the big game on the air, we'll talk today with professor jeffrey sachs, professor sachs, a professor at columbia university, one of the most authoritative, if not the most... international economist in the world, okay well-known russian audience, and professor sachs, i always learn a lot from you, but today i especially want to learn from you, because

i sincerely do not understand what happened in washington at the nato summit. i don't understand why this document was adopted. adopted at the nato summit - this is a classic example of those who came to power in us foreign policy 30 years ago, subjugated everything , they proceed from the fact that the united states should rule the world, and the united states should be the world

hegemon, that the united states should dominate around the world in all areas. course, it is supported by ideologists and representatives of the military industry, when this foreign policy course was proclaimed, dikcheni, who was then the minister

of defense, and then became, as we know, the vice president, it was he who called for invasion of iraq, so... what do we see in this document? this is an uncompromising statement in the spirit of neoconservatism. the document says that the process of ukraine's accession to nato is irreversible, and it says that nato will play an increasingly increasing role essentially throughout the world, because it mentions the western balkans and the middle east and africa, and what now. in the united states it is customary to call the indo-pacific region, what

is usually called the asia-pacific regions maritime trade routes. all this, of course, cannot but be alarming, it means that the neoconservatives did not learn from themselves and did not draw any conclusions. and this document does not say a word at all about diplomatic efforts to end the war in ukraine.

tracists who believe that that system they are not aimed at defense, these are the descendants of the government, whatever it is called, which the neocons represent, control that they cannot be safe unless they establish their hegemony over the whole world, this is already it’s not about defense, it’s about attack.

that all these wars that the usa started and nato countries, afghanistan, iraq, syria, libya,

ukraine, all these wars that they started, which ended unsuccessfully, the group that started all these wars, it still controls the foreign policy of the united states, this is quite obvious to me, yesterday interesting material appeared in the washington post newspaper, you of course know that the washington post often. will become a member of nato, and this is actually the

reason why the whole war in ukraine began. and here in this kamenikka it is repeated once again that the process of joining ukraine's entry into nato is irreversible. so, the washington post wrote that biden was very much against such wording. and biden suggested writing something else. he said: let's write that ukraine will definitely integrate. western institutions, let's not mention nato, or let's mention nato, but let's not say that this is an irreversible process. this is a very interesting detail, because no one talks about it openly, but apparently biden still tried to resist, but then jake solevan, his national security adviser, told biden: no, it needs

to be said just like that, the process of ukraine joining nato is irreversible. and then biden agreed. of course, i don't know how much we can trust this story. biden has been having a hard time thinking lately. he does not belong in the presidential chair. he already looks like the late brezhny. i would say so. maybe. but in any case, in essence, biden is doing what his advisers tell him. that is, everything in the usa is run by a secret unofficial the government, what i mean, is the intelligence services of the cia, the pentagon, large military concerns, hardliners, these are the people who really decide everything in the united states, and

biden is forced to follow their instructions. the united states has already exhausted all its reserves, the shells have run out, there is nothing left in the warehouses, the patriot systems have also all been used up, because they are actively being destroyed in ukraine. again in our

press, this time the wall street journal recently had a very interesting article saying. it’s hard to stop and turn around, maybe maybe because some countries in europe behave particularly aggressively, i’m talking now primarily about the baltic countries and poland, which have taken an absolutely anti-russian position, maybe they are also pushing this agenda, for one reason or another it turned out to be so tough an uncompromising

document, precisely at a time when we should be looking for some compromises.

trump has only two options, but he definitely won’t be president next year. his foreign policy team is absolutely unprofessional people who make completely unrealistic plans. again, i don’t know whether they are guided by some political considerations, the main thing is not to show any weakness in the run-up to the elections, or maybe. these are neoconservatives, and representatives of the secret government continue to pursue their line, i don’t know what ’s going on there, i don’t completely rule out the possibility.

in fact, he will leave earlier, because he and this means before january, although he may be in very bad physical shape now, and it is absolutely obvious that he simply does not have opportunity to perform the duties of the president , i understand what they in the american white house are counting on if you...

the soviet union in the eighties, and he mentioned that then the soviet union spent 13% of its national product, and

the russian president added, but now we could reach 8.5%, that is, while 8.5% is definitely not being spent, and i’m not sure that there are plans to spend such amounts, but at the same time it is obvious that... there are opportunities to spend more on defense, and , given the price structure in russia for the same money, russia can acquire more weapons than the united states. so i want to understand, when they think, when they talk about victory over russia, do they say this at the level of rhetoric, or do they really believe in the possibility of such a victory, if it is as they imagine? when they talk about victory, i think this

is done at the level of rhetoric, because it is impossible to imagine any other explanation, only if the person has completely gone crazy, so of course i don’t know. in my head that this is rhetoric or already insanity, i hope that it’s just rhetoric, but to understand what's going on here, you can go back to the time of the vietnam war, one of the best articles on this topic was written by daniel ellsberg, i think in the seventies, so it turns out to be more than 50 years ago, so here we go. and ellsberg talked about this, called it the myth of the quagmire, and said, he asked, how did the united states get involved in

this story, in this terrible war in vietnam? the usual explanation is that it was a kind of swamp, that is , a swamp is such a thing where it is easy to step on, then it sucks you deeper and deeper and deeper. so, elsberg carefully analyzed the whole story. turned into such an eternal story that lasted for more than 10 years, due to the fact that not a single american politician wanted to

jeopardize his... chances of re-election. for americans, the most important thing is the next election. here you go, a completely plausible explanation. perhaps everything can be explained by the internal political situation in the united states and the desire to win the next elections. and not geostrategy. they don't want ukraine to be defeated before the elections. november that's all. everything is very simple. but the fact is that ukraine is not just running out of weapons, the worst thing is that ukraine is running out of people. and we see that ukraine is suffering huge losses. ukraine may have lost 500,000 people killed and another half a million wounded. and ukraine. loses

55,000 people every month, from a human point of view this is a catastrophe, this is a tragedy, but this, among other things, is a logistics problem. ukraine cannot afford to continue the war at this rate. ukraine is losing its population. and even if nato is send their weapons to ukraine, who will use these weapons? same? ukrainian soldiers will die using these weapons, and these soldiers will run out sooner or later. ukrainians are now trying to escape from ukraine by hook or by crook, so that they are not sent to a training camp for several weeks, and then straight to the front, so that they are immediately killed there. this is a disaster, all this was not discussed for a single minute.

china and the soviet union, what china and the soviet union had with each other, and there were two approaches to relations with moscow, kisinger and brzuzinski, brjuzinski was significantly more assertive against russia than

kisinger. but they agreed on one thing: the united states cannot, should not have a situation where moscow and beijing unite against washington. do i understand correctly that the administration, for one reason or another , decided to discard this approach, believes that it can simultaneously attack china on... yes, you know, it turns out very interesting, in ninety-seven, dzhezinski wrote about the strategic importance of ukraine, and he said that ukraine with over time he will end up in the western camp, i think that’s how he put it, and he said that

there is only one thing that can prevent this. if us policy leads to a rapprochement between russia and china, but then zhuzinsky said, but this is such an unlikely scenario, it would be such a catastrophic mistake, i just can’t imagine that the us would ever allow this. and yet, now the united states and the neoconservatives are deliberately pursuing such a course, because they call the countries their enemies, they are enemies for the neoconservatives. russia and china. and so, by calling these two countries their enemies, they thereby led to the rapprochement of these countries. it is clear that the united states has other enemies: north korea, of course, which now has very close

strategic relations. russia and iran, iran has also now moved towards rapprochement with russia, so the us foreign policy is in fact. led to the whole world uniting against the united states. the united states has isolated itself and other countries from the rest of the world. we see this in particular with regard to the situation in gas. but the most important thing, the most the main thing is that the neoconservatives, in their vision of the world, proceed from the completely wrong idea that the united states has enough resources to...

conservatives cannot even imagine that anyone else in the world would ever dare to throw challenge to the united states. they completely missed the moment when china began to strengthen, they missed the strengthening of china, they missed the economic and technological growth in russia too. so it turned out that both of these countries became a big surprise for... what does this mean? this this means that their naive position, they stubbornly continue to cling to it, this has been going on for five administrations, it all started with clinton,

then there was bush jr., then there was obama, who naturally despised russia, but he started it. biden's foreign policy, it's getting worse and worse. let's go to advertising. our studio has wonderful artists who

gave their voices to their favorite characters. go ahead, stab him with a mustache. kostya raikin agreed to star in this film only because i voiced it. i tried to play in such a way that it was convenient in the frame. vanya, i am yours forever. i myself didn’t know that it was me, yes, it’s not me, i refused, then i realized, yes, that it was me, but that was a very, very long time ago, say something in that beautiful voice, you don’t have enough funds to call , i voiced the cars, i gave the fans a show, chow, i am speed, children will immediately recognize me by this, call me, call me, i have covered so many quails, but everyone knows that i just call, call me, well, because it’s brilliant . the route has been built, don’t forget to give us rating in the app, i’m arriving somehow nataite, in fact, you could

n’t do anything else, go and ask everyone if you’ve been to nataite, tonight with nikolayets on the first, what do you know about... this is one of the most prosperous and developed countries in latin america. i also know that there are more cows living here than people. the national meat of the uruguayans is beef; it is almost a religion for us. what a model of a beautiful woman in montevida. for our women , comfort comes first; some feel comfortable without makeup, some won’t go to the supermarket without full makeup. what are you drinking this mote? yes, these are special leaves from a tree, and also different herbs. mate is not sold in coffee shops and restaurants; everyone makes it for themselves only at home. do you often come to dance? i come here not only to dance, but also to find a gentleman, you know, i’m already

at such an age that i want to meet my love. the lives of others. premiere. sunday on the first. will you be bored? well, when i get there, don’t forget your hat, it’s cold there, goodbye, thank you very much!

well, china made a very harsh statement just a couple of hours ago. china categorically objects to the wording that we saw in this stone. i’m not even talking now about the fact that ukraine’s entry into nato is an irreversible process. there are also a lot of bad things being said about china.

was created for the purpose of defense, defense against you yourself just said that it was the soviet union in the north atlantic region. the soviet union no longer exists. and yet we see this kind of kamenikke. where it is written in black and white that nato will play an important role in the region they call the indo-pacific. it is america, of course, that insists on speaking specifically indo-pacific in order to relegate china to the background. and now it turns out that nato will play an increasingly active role in containing china and surrounding it with military bases. but again, this is complete madness.

i think it's just the opposite, the us is more dependent on china than china is dependent on the us. you know, an article was published just recently, i still i didn’t have time to read it, but this article just shows that the us military industry is very strong. the united states is very dependent on components from china, and this article clearly shows this; the fact is that the chinese industry has now gained very high momentum and produces at fairly low prices.

will simply begin to supply its goods to other countries around the world, but supplies from china to the usa are decreasing every year, they have not only slowed down their growth, but now exports are actually declining, i checked for several months back to the statistics, and there was a decline of about 20% compared to the previous year, 20% for the year is very serious, on the other hand, supplies from china...

a loan, but china has such an opportunity, naturally, -then they will have to sell in they can afford to sell some things on credit, so if the us continues to pursue this protectionist policy, i think china will simply diversify its export route perhaps. in some intermediate position, because europe will not be able to introduce the same protectionist measures in relation to china, because europe is absolutely dependent on supplies from china, otherwise the entire european economy will collapse, so europe cannot afford to act as tough as the us does, so

europe will remain somewhere in the middle, and the european market china will rather won't lose everything. because it will probably lose the american market, but in short, what i want to say is this, i don't think that the us can force china to do something that it doesn't want to do, force china to break off trade relations or break strategic partnership with russia. china understands everything perfectly well, china knows that if it is given to the americans now...

both between the president of russia and the prime minister of india and much more broadly between these two very important countries, but the united states still hopes that if it does not succeed, how if you should put pressure on china, then you will be able to put pressure and maybe somehow seduce.

to get something from each of these countries, when indians communicate with the usa, from them, indians need military technologies, it seems to me that this is the main thing for india in relations usa. india has joined such a quad organization; it is the united states that is trying to create such a bloc. india, japan, some other countries, and to oppose this bloc to china, this, by the way, is another crazy project of the neoconservatives, they think that. india will become an ally of the united states in the fight against china. this is , of course, nonsense, but the indians would not mind

receiving advanced weapons systems, advanced technologies, and so on from the americans, but if anyone thinks that india will follow the lead and become a puppet of the united states, they are deeply mistaken. let's not forget that india is still the most populous country in the world, with almost one and a half billion people, they have overtaken japan and are in third place in terms of economic indicators. india is not a country that will be at anyone's beck and call. india maintains long-term relations with russia, both trade and military-technical cooperation. well, as

for relations with china, this is a complex issue. indian-chinese relations are quite a big problem; there are territorial disputes that have been going on for about 70 years, this concerns the border.

that the americans asked them to do this, no, the americans do not have such leverage on these countries, they expect that they can put pressure on india, but this is certainly not the case, india is a huge independent country, it is an influential power, so india will support good relations with china and russia. a very sensitive question, and i apologize in advance for this, but the question is important for russia, russia, as you know, went on a special military operation, it seems that

in america this is called aggression, unprovoked, it seemed that it should have show russia’s determination, the seriousness of russian intentions. russia has increased its military production very substantially, and russia has strengthened its armed forces. nevertheless. use ukraine in order to use western weapons, western money, western intelligence information, to strike targets in russia, and russia will not respond to the sponsors.

russia naturally perceives this war as

a war that affects basic russian interests. danger, so russia will fight, it will not be that russia is in at some point he will say, okay, well, let ukraine join its nato. in addition, i think that russia will advance on the battlefield, yes, of course, while suffering heavy losses, but on the ukrainian side, the losses will be even greater, i think this will continue and... i think that as a result , ukraine will run out of young people, and this, of course, is a tragedy. ukraine will continue to lose territory, at some point, sooner or later, to someone, i don’t know who, maybe it will be europe, but someone influential, or maybe be in the usa, the president or representatives of this

secret government will say: that’s it, it’s time to end this, that’s enough. fought, then when the united states says enough is enough, then nato, as they say, will irreversibly leave ukraine, then the united states will sit down at the table, then many serious issues related to security from russia will be discussed , where the systems can be deployed will be discussed aegis, and where not. the architecture of security treaties in the field of nuclear weapons will be discussed, these are all the most important issues, which must definitely be discussed, the american president will have to discuss these issues with president putin, this will definitely happen, i don’t know when, but until this happens, this terrible war will continue, first of all

, ukraine will suffer. it is ukraine that is the main victim of this war. what could happen next? there are several scenarios: either russia will win a decisive victory. second option: it may turn out that the war will drag on, russia will gradually suffer losses, but nevertheless advance forward.

france, italy, germany. why do they act contrary to their national interests? why have they brought the european economy to the point where it is suffering greatly?

he, as a representative of the european union, met with them and now he is telling the truth, so there are countries like hungary, there is slovakia, there is fitso, there are people who tell the truth, maybe someone else will join them, finally, finally, europe will find its own identity and will do something to put an end to this terrible situation,

because there are several european countries who said it clearly. that's it, it's over, we don't want this anymore, let's finish it, let's start negotiations, this option is also possible, the war can end like this, even if the us. then little happened between moscow and washington under donald trump; in some respects, the situation even worsened. do you think there is real reason to think that

trump may begin to pursue a more constructive, more pragmatic line towards russia. well, you know, trump is so unstable and unpredictable man, i think we need to admit it. of course, a lot will depend on his advisers. we know that trump's advisers deceived him. we know what john bolton wrote in his memoirs. and i consider it absolutely irresponsible behavior when a person who was not elected is some kind of adviser. deliberately deceives his president, deliberately leads him by the nose, slips him some information in order to force him to make the decisions that this adviser likes. over

the past few weeks, trump has done some interesting statements, if i understand correctly, he said that it was nato that provoked this war, and he said if in the usa. if there had been a smart president, then there would not have been this enmity with russia and china. sounds good, i wouldn't, of course, completely trust what he says now, because we know that this man is very unstable, it is unclear what he wants, and his actions when he was president did not lead to solution to the ukrainian crisis, in fact, with it the situation, for example, in relations with china, it was even worse, then under biden, of course, things went even further, but nevertheless, maybe it will get better, but still , about trump, i’m absolutely not sure, it’s difficult

to predict anything, i wouldn’t definitely do it now to say that when trump comes to power everything will be fine, but i would like to add a couple more words, if trump becomes president, then there is hope that europe will come to its senses faster. if trump becomes president, then the europeans will understand that they need to end this war at the negotiating table. because this war is possible finish it either if the us decides to finish it or if europe decides to finish it. someone, either the us or europe, needs to say, let's come to the negotiating table. let's find some acceptable solution. thank you very much, professor sachs. "we always learn a lot from you, and of course, this is a very difficult situation for russia and for the world, it is very important to have, well, an analysis that is not optimistic, radio optimism, but

which shows that the situation, although very complex, is not hopeless. thank you very much , we hope to see you again soon in our air. thank you bye. thank you, dmitry, for the four seas, for the four suns, the summer rains, and it’s good that he doesn’t know about this, i still won’t leave him, because he’s good, good, of course,

tomorrow on the first, it seems to me that this it’s not a sin, after all, this is love, which i already had at 25.

incompatible, he is an incredible man, i realized, my god, this man also loves the camera, it’s interesting to watch him, he holds the frame, you haven’t thought of changing your profession yet, no, he filled the entire frame - with his human power, he could do so much for cinema, for his country, on that shore where i had never been, he left traces of my feet. so you dream, you dream, sergei puskipalis, when i’m not there, on sunday at the first, in the mid-nineties, as far as i remember, it was 1995, i was.

to yeltsin's political advisers, varantsov believed in a great russia, and like many russians, it seemed to him that the soviet union no longer existed, that communism had been abandoned by russia, and now a new pro-western democratic russia could become natural partner of the united states. this, of course, turned out to be the case. an illusion, and talbat

clearly made it clear that from his point of view, with the collapse of the soviet union, with russian economic difficulties, with the actual weakening of the russian armed forces, strop talbat made it clear that, in general, russia needs to know its place, and there is nothing for the russian ambassador to act as if russia was still a great... power to be reckoned with, and of course, given that russia had a completely different perspective, that said that serious disagreements... and even conflict became inevitable, but at this dinner something more concrete happened that i always remembered, the evening was very fun, i was sitting next to the wife of the famous american diplomat paul nitze, and my wife

was sitting in another corner of the table next to paul nitsa, they were laughing very animatedly, then it turned out that paul, who was already nearly 90, enthusiastically told how he played with his little sister, she offended him, and he took her and out of anger bitten, and although for this his parents punished him, he liked it so much that he could do it, that even until his old age he could not forget it, when dinner was over and we went out, the floor, whom i had known for many years, and we communicated with the houses, told me : listen, there is one thing that i would like to discuss with you, let's call tomorrow, and we called, and we met, and he told me that you are hearing from the clinton administration, then the clinton administration was in power,

regarding the expansion of nato , i told him what was the official position of the administration, what are they... how to conduct, if you like, competition with the soviet union in the late forties, to

what extent to perceive the soviet union as an adversary? kennen was more cautious, nitsa was more determined in his desire to go into confrontation. with the stalinist soviet union and nitsa later organized a committee on the existing danger, which became, well, if you like, the main lobbying organization for a tougher line towards moscow, then, when he was already serving in the reagan administration, it was he who was the head delegation that negotiated... medium-range nuclear weapons, it was he who agreed with the soviet delegation, naturally, the soviet leadership, that these weapons would be eliminated, this happened in 1987, and this became, if you like, the most significant most

significant victory of joint soviet american diplomacy, now nitsa was concerned because... he heard from the state department, as i understand it, from strobe talbot himself, that they decided that it was impossible to refuse to involve countries, who were part of the soviet union, it is impossible to refuse to...