yes, if we remember who he could play, what was practically created for him, this is also what was considered the main role, the role played by gaft in the film, the garage of uldar ryazanov, well, in general , he was on very good terms with rezanov close friendly relations, rezanov without auditions, that he thinks that shervint really liked it, very often called him in his films, even in those films that ultimately did not happen, for example, one of these, well, not the main, but secondary roles of ryazanov .

yes, but i really want you to play it. shirvin later wrote that it’s very cool to play episodes with your friends, and directors, good directors. it is important here that two qualities are combined: your friends and good directors, because they are terribly grateful to you that you are saving them, yes, you also have the feeling that you are saving them, you can for a small role, for a few minutes in the frame , it may be more likely that your performance will be remembered by the audience than if you play some long series there, the main thing is

that something is somehow, perhaps, more profitable for you somehow, in general, this role helps you in life, sometimes it really doesn’t help, sometimes drunk people constantly come up to you and ask in which bathhouse this most famous episode was filmed, where lukashin’s wife was sent to leningrad, anatolyich, they called him on the street , all sorts of different comrades offered to drink, yeah, and this is a well-known story, of course, but that doesn’t make it any less funny and what...

was this filmed at night in the mosfilm pavilions? why at night? because the actors are involved in this scene, and there are whole of them four, playing in different theaters, terribly busy, yes, well, imagine: mikhkov, murkov, belyasky and shirvent, well, how, how to collect them, only at night, so they had to film two nights in a row, because on the first night they decided to delay filming real alcohol, and rezanov was terribly angry, and he was quite happy during the filming... even with friends he forced them to come and play it again and they played it for the second time, but according to shirvint’s version, ryazanov took what we see on the screen - this is the very first night where wonderful actors play not quite professionally, but more realistically , it’s probably felt, probably for the viewer it’s also some kind of environment for the role according to stanislavsky’s system, yes, yes, yes, by this moment, by the end of the seventies to the beginning

of the eighties, shirvin was really a star, he is famous, despite the fact that those main roles that we named, maybe not hamlet and not astap bender, yes, not everything is given to him, not everything is given to him so that he wants, well, i must say that here we are in this studio recorded a separate episode about gleb panfilov and recently, when studying the archive on linfilm, you remember, we got acquainted with the transcript of the discussion of the acting auditions for the film “i have the floor,” where ina chyurikova played the main role, the role of the leader of a small provincial town, and shirvent also auditioned for one of the roles in this film, but they didn’t approve. the point is that shirvint may have already become - too great an artist to play in a photoactive role, but for episodes, yes, he seemed to shine, like from... one of the audience's favorite films

irina muravyova plays the main role of a girl who should already be getting married, but something, something doesn’t work out, yes, by chance she meets her old friend, played by tatyana vasilyeva, that psychologist who deals with these very problems of relationships between men and women, according to the scientific method, she is going to help her friend find a husband, and vasilyeva is playing her husband, respectively, her friend...

arkady, i completely forgot, i interrupted the rehearsal, she forgot, let's go, smile at me, as i told you so, let's go to the car, he's a genius after all, they noticed us, they were looking at us, several people were standing there, as if paralyzed. maybe wave at them? did susanna allow it? no, then there is no need for any amateur performances, after all, this is science, sit down, quite a lot on

the screen, so we see him in such roles, sometimes creators, well, it’s difficult to call them directly creators. yes, but people associated with art, at least sometimes, however, these people move more towards some kind of art leaders, yes, as in another painting by ildar ryazanov, a forgotten melody for flutes, there he plays along with the main character, who is played by leonid felatov, and he is such an official there, yes, and even among the old robbers, he is also an official, these are the kind of leaders on the screen from... this category, perhaps the most famous his role is a film performance based on the famous performance of the satire theater zheniba figaron, where he plays count almaviva, actually, yes, here he is, that’s where, much higher, much more, again, with andrei mironov, yes, this is their replacement duet , the replacement ensemble,

in principle, which we can still do fortunate to see him on the screen, but, by the way, he also could not have played this role, initially the performances. she was played by valentin gaft, so they somehow changed sometimes, yes, shirvin could play in the garage, gaft played, gaft started here, then shirvent came, and if gavt had this role it was really like the second male lead, they uh with the same dynamics, whether they competed with mironov on stage, then count almaviva performed by shirvint is a man already quite tired of some kind of intrigue, this is really a man from... who, in general , doesn’t care about all this anymore, and this is on the screen, even in this film, the performance is felt like this, it’s felt like this, again, some kind of psychophysics of the actor, yes, to put it in serious words, and self-irony, the gap between the actor and

the role, it is really impossible to imagine that we would forget at some point that in front of us is not just a hero, but alexander shirvint, but our pleasure from this very often is just... just like a skit, very often these are even aphorisms that are mounted like this, and yes, about they told him that, again, even as a director, there are people who make one big piece of work, and it’s just monolithic, but there are talents who know how to put together something

sparkling, cheerful, diverse from different pieces , never boring, this was precisely shirvint’s talent, he was a person who was talented in a small form. talent, what favorite films with sherdent’s participation would you remember? well, for me , all those films that we mentioned are actually my favorites, i i don’t even know what else to mention, outside of this series, but for me the role of felix is ​​once again about love, it’s really very interesting, and in general, here he comes on the screen, as if we were opening a door of some kind of window, well, it seems to me that the main thing... maybe his function or, in general , the edge of his talent is that he

instantly attracts all the attention, you don’t see what’s standing there in the background, well, in my favorite film with with the participation of shirvand, come tomorrow, belov is standing in the background, too quite a big actor who was famous, you forget about frosya borlakova, you make fun of everything, there is only shirvina, who seems to concentrate all the attention on himself in the image of stanislavsky, and we saw the same effect in the film, self-conscious and attractive in this short passage, everything everyone is looking... looking at him, and he doesn’t seem to be doing anything special, yes, maybe he’s not even playing, but just getting into the car, but how does he do it, and this was a podcast of witnesses from einstein and its leading film historians, natalya ryabchikova and stanislav didinsky, we talk about who and how created our favorite, perhaps half-forgotten or completely unknown soviet films, about how to watch them now and how to enjoy them even more, and today we talked about a wonderful one and one of our favorite actors, alexandra shirvente. who could turn 90 years old, goodbye,

there are periods in our history that, well , are created for adventure literature, ala, alexandre dumas, for example, and... conspiracies, intrigues, alcove secrets, thunder of drums, well this, of course, is the history of palace coups, first of all, of course, it is not without reason that they are very loved by our creators of such costume series, god be with him, but the trouble is that too often these series are used to judge the true history, this is what always confuses me very much , that’s for sure, or based on

the novels of valentin pikul, which are not only very far from the principle of historicism, but also simply contain a lot of historical errors, facts, he generally handled the facts , to put it mildly, freely. in general, for a long time this the period was considered such a period of timelessness between peter and catherine, and this is absolutely not true, and this is another reason in this time to understand how. hello, this is a historical podcast: russia and the west on the swing of history. pyotr romanov and sergey soloviev are with you. today we will deal with the era of palace coups. klyuchevsky dates the era of palace coups to the period from the death of peter the great to the accession to the throne of catherine the great. decree of peter i of 1722. which allowed the monarch to have

an heir, well, i don’t know, there is theoretically own will to appoint anyone, it was absolutely possible there was something in this, that is, he could choose the best, but as history itself has proven, he worked poorly, because even the same peter himself, he had to choose the best of the worst, and in the end he did so , did not leave an heir, as a matter of fact . from these times began the era of, so to speak, palace coups, well, actually immediately from the death of peter, and indeed this time, in no case should be considered without time, there are a lot of paradoxical things, klyuchevsky wrote all the time that during his reign, he loved aphorisms, and during his reign, the germans fell into russia like rubbish from a leaky bag. it seems that the germans are really beron, there is asterman, minich, many others, many really came,

so to speak, hunting, as we would say, for a long ruble, but on the other hand, it was under anna that the salaries of foreign specialists in the russian service were equalized, and russians, because there were already enough of our own, even ship captains, out of twenty ships 13 fleets, respectively, were already russian , while under peter the ratio was completely different...

they are overthrown through intrigue, yes, long-armed, long-armed, yes, there was an intrigue of its own, so to speak, god bless it, which means he sits on the throne , finally, peter’s grandson peter ii, he dies very quickly, again there is a problem, so to speak, with the inheritance of the throne, and here the so-called...

returns, breaks these conditions, and again, with the help of the guard, reigns, after anna ioannovna, if my memory serves me right, which means that anna ioanovna, dying, leaves power is formally in the hands of his distant relative anna leopoldovna, ivan vi,

after all, therefore, leaves power formally, as if in her hands, but at the same time, as if legally, the then infant ioan antonovich should become legitimate under the regency of beron, that is, biron has real power, biron has real power, not for long, not for long, minikh overthrows him, and after some time, that means, a new coup elizaveta petrovna and minikh goes to prison, which he himself, and he was an engineer.

only after catherine's death does paul come to power and he is also killed, that is , this whole chain demonstrates how turbulently lawless that era was in essence. yes, i would still take the coup against paul i out of the equation, because unlike this, we will now talk about this of the clan nature of the palace coups that have been going on since 1725.

he is german, which means osterman, in russia he was called andrei ivanovich, and also the son of a pastor from westphalia, heinrich osterman. this means that he, he had a very long career under a number of our rulers, he was valued and how

a diplomat and as a person versed in internal affairs, a very interesting episode to characterize starman himself, when there was a vacuum of power, at the same time, which means this was an application, when the figure of peter’s grandson loomed, so to speak, looming, but he was not proclaimed sovereign, which means that asterman was looking for different options, finally he suggested the option of marrying this peter to the future empress elizabeth petrovna, who was his aunt, the age difference there was more than significant, a teenager peter already an adult. that is, a person devoid of any special boundaries in general, well, for that time, especially for the german principalities , a normal story for those of course everything,

so this same osterman, it means that he was present at this meeting of the supreme leaders, he supported dmitry galitsin when he proposed the candidacy of anna ianovna, when they began to discuss the... conditions limiting the power of the future empress, he, under the pretext that his aggro had played out, he ran away from this council, but at the same time, it means as you write, witnesses write, he went to bed, was covered with plasters and lotions on all sides, but at the same time developed vigorous activity, with a pen in his hand, which means he... assured in all his letters, persuaded everyone to what needed to be preserved the autocracy is absolutely in complete integrity, well , first of all, he naturally wrote

to anna iannovna herself in mitava, but he, in fact, contributed, so to speak, to the guardsmen supporting anna iannovna, therefore anna iannovna, even having signed all these conditions, returning to russia, she knew very well that her... and according to osterman’s thoughts, a cabinet of ministers was established, in which all the initiative belonged to him, and his opinion almost always

prevailed, so osterman should be entirely credited with the actions of the cabinet at that time, this is not oberon , and the ostermans, and here again there is such a paradox, in my opinion, it means that this is how america was discovered... by columbus, and the name of america was given by ameriga vispucci, which means that it turns out here, if you believe the encyclopedic dictionary, it means that everyone says about beronovschina, but ruled russia, well, if you believe this osterman dictionary, well, beron was still the closest person to the chkanna, and osterman, a clever intriguer, then without this it was impossible to stay in power, he still... received all the sanctions for his actions from biron, as for the cabinet of ministers, it was actually the restored supreme privy council, it was just

that anna dissolved it for an attempt with conditions, but there should have been some kind of authority of such a central government, and accordingly this role began to be played by the cabinet of ministers created , accordingly, already under her, and especially since anna herself was not very interested in state affairs; it was not ruled by other people, primarily beron, after all. as minich's son ernst wrote, you will leave very interesting memories, her heart, that is, anna, was filled with generosity, generosity and condolences, but her will almost always depended more on others than on herself. the duke of kurlyansky retained supreme power, and it was not weakened even until his death. uh, to please him, the strongest monarch in christian lands, she deprived herself of her freedom to the point that not only did she most subtly direct all of her actions according to his thoughts, but she also could not do a single moment without him. it must be said that she had this inability to exist without a man next to her before; before biron, she had with her pyotr bestuzhev, ambassador to mitau, father

of famous diplomats. the story, of course, with anna leopoldovna with the elimination of beroon. anna leopoldovna was in russia from the age of five, from 1723, she was raised generally in russia, a woman was, in general, quite simple-minded, unlike anna, completely non-cruel, who generally appreciated and apparently loved her husband anton ulrich of brunswick; in august of the fortieth year she gave birth to a son , ivan, who was proclaimed

anna ivanovna’s heir. the throne, accordingly, as you already said, was appointed regent under her, and of course, the young emperor, who was not yet a year old, accordingly, a political struggle inevitably broke out, and here, of course, the figure of minich, the talented an engineer, an associate of peter, although in later years, in my opinion, from the twenty-first year he was in russian service, he played a large role in the construction of the ladazh canal, more importantly.

history, he later called himself the pillar of the russian empire, this is the pillar of the russian empire, in the end, in general, he put in vain a huge number of soldiers during his campaigns in the crimea, during the wars with turkey, the war with turkey, respectively, in the moldavian principalities, in in general, the commander is clearly unlucky, and we continue, today our topic is palace coups in russia. minyukh was a careerist, certainly a scandalous person, he quarreled with everyone he could. and of course, he decided to trick beron, he persuaded anna leopoldovna, who , one might say, was subjected to apale from beron, crept into their confidence, although it was he and storman who petitioned for the appointment of berona as regent under the young ivan, and accordingly on november 9, 1940 spoke out against beron, beron was sent to the very prison that you already mentioned, well, it’s interesting that many people regarded

this coup as... minich over beron very many regarded osterman as an intrigue, that is, he already had such a reputation , an already established reputation, so the russian ambassador in constantinople rumyantsev, having received news of the coup, wrote to the same astarman: “not only i am here, but everyone in color had a heartfelt parade , knowing that this is your wisdom."

already the coup of 1741 by elizaveta petrovna, here already a trace, so to speak, of influence from outside can be traced very clearly. among the main persons who influenced the event. uh, there was the frenchman listok, elizabeth's personal physician petrovna. by the way, he came to us during the reign of peter the great, and so he had a very...

friend and in general she is not a very decisive person, which is true, which was true, but she did not take into account the energy of lestocq, who, well, memory according to the stories, he came to elizaveta petrovna, who was still hesitating, and brought her two drawings. one depicted elizabeth in the crown, in another drawing she was depicted in a cell in a monastic robe, and he told her, in general, choose, either you are on the throne, or you will be there, all your associates and gentlemen.

he was then chancellor, but in the end, after much effort, he managed to intercept one of the dispatches, so to speak, shitardi, when he read this dispatch while off duty, he immediately grabbed it. naturally he showed it, brought it, showed it to elizabeth, there was a very unforgiving description of the empress herself, but the most important thing was that in this dispatch shitardi wrote about the bribes that were given to people from elizabeth’s entourage, he wrote that here is a piece of paper, a piece of paper is needed raise the salary, i don’t know what was more important.

a large party is ready to take up arms for the enthronement of the grand duchess elizabeth petrovna, that this plan, conceived , was finally settled between them by the agents of the grand duchess with the help of the french ambassador marquis delacherdi, and that all negotiations between them and the grand duchess were conducted through the french surgeon, the leaflet, yes,

the english ambassador finch, who had been with her since childhood, handed it all over to astermann and anton ulrich, they agreed, nodded their heads, did nothing, and in general it should be noted that in that '. well, relatively speaking, a whistle in a steam boiler, that is, uh, they somehow corrected after all, uh, if not the relationship between the power of the people, this is an exaggeration, then at least the power

of the noble class, klyuchevsky writes that the noble class had the opportunity to dispose of the throne several times and began to turn from simple government. he emphasizes that the nobility acquired all its privileges through not entirely legal means, through revolutionary means. ultimately, the nobility got the opportunity to live for themselves, guided by class or personal interests. here coups in that period, according to a number of these researchers, became a kind of instrument for adjusting the political system. i agree with this, but probably only.

this is a historical podcast russia-west on

the swing of history, we are dealing with the era of palace coups. the sacredness of royal power was violated during these palace coups. well, listen, what kind of sacredness of royal power can we talk about when the guards stand at the royal bedchamber, in the royal palace, they see all these intrigues, they see the favorites, they see, in general, the bed secrets of the empress. ekaterinsky, well, here, too, the influence is absolutely foreign. english, just in this case, she closely communicated with

the english envoy henbury williamson, and received money, and he gave her advice, she thanked him for this advice, for his help, that’s the only thing that the result of catherine’s reign as a whole was a plus our national history is assessed, therefore, in general, they prefer not to remember how she came to power, she also came to power with foreign assistance, so to speak, not without outside influence. catherine’s coup, of course, there can be found a lot of arguments that it was natural, because peter ii was a person of little popularity and little sympathy for the russian people in general and especially for... the army and the nobility, especially

here , catherine’s personality was also of great importance, and because, well, yes, the orlovs, dashkova, so to speak, they are undoubtedly important participants in all these events, but first of all, this is, of course, the personality of catherine herself, there is one little-known episode of this whole revolutionary story, which means before the coup, when... the conspiracy was already being prepared, everything was being prepared, which means that catherine was living in peterhof at that time, literally a few days before the coup, she generally moved from the palace to one of the pavilions, which i was on the outskirts, there was an ideal position, it was formally so, seemingly removed from political life, although she received all the information necessary, and then this place was so ideal.