in company with derzhavin and derzhavin, such a duet about... which, as it were, like tropunka and shtepsel, was always known on television in the eighties and before, of course, by the way, shirvin also staged numbers for doropunka and shtepsel, and now we are talking about stand-up when -they called it conference, well, that is, a stand-up is a person who, as it were, holds the whole act on himself, and a conference is the one who talks in the audience between numbers, yes, but there are simply legends of such a entertainer - with whom

shirvend is included communicated, worked, maybe to say that at some moments raikin acted as an entertainer, utes, yes, that same same trap and plug, and shirvent, by the way, even came up with some characters like these comic ones, comic old women, comic old women who in others they continue to live in other guises, even in childhood i had a record, veronika mavrikievna and nikitishna, i forgot how complex their names are. incredibly memorable, but shirment, he came up with it, yes, this conversation with the audience, again, influenced our perception of him, for him it was always quite difficult to transform, he did not like to thunder, for example, for roles, yes, the nose does something, he said, yes, yes. it

’s organically easier for him to be himself, he said that there are just different types of actors, that’s how he is, once in his youth on stage he portrayed some kind of performance about going to lenin, something with a beard, that’s it . this was said by him at the very pinnacle of his transformation, in principle in his career, always a little wider, always a little this ironic attitude towards his own. yes, here he is i said, there is such a wonderful actor as anatoly popanov, and so he spends many, many hours in the dressing room, doing complex makeup, and after that the scene comes out, i’m not like that, i’m always about the same, shirvint in the proposed circumstances, but in general - we really see him on the screen in about the same way we see shirvint, who is put in some conditions, then he somehow gets out of it, well, he comes up with a character, but plus or minus it’s always like it’s basically the same. the same actor, no matter

what role he plays in the film adaptation, three boats, i don’t think dogs are either self-charming and attractive, we remember that this is really our beloved alexander shervin, once again, i’ll steal it, if theft is your thing, once again i’m flying to moscow, odessa, again they won’t let me out on my own. and even quails with quails, you spin in infinity, the years rise for centuries, slowly, go, a little slower, in memory of vladimir.

this is witnessstein's podcast, its leading film historians natalya ryabchikova and stanislav dyadinsky, we continue the conversation about alexander shirvind, who is now would have turned 90 years old. we mentioned mikhail derzhavin, with whom he created a wonderful duet, they have known each other since their youth, they were born in the same place.

blessed, but did not go to the coffin, they had no equal in the duet, derzhavin went to the tavern, meaning 13 chairs, but shirvent survived the separation, he has peace. extended his diamond hand, it was known, and their ability to work together, the three of them appear on the screen, just in three boats, not counting the dog, a film that, well, is a little nonsense in the soviet history of cinema, naun birman decided to make a film adaptation of jerome ka jerome, everything should be like real englishmen, real london, filmed in the kaliningrad region, make-up done.

please, sir, sir, this is a comic couplet: a comic couplet, stop, do you really think that you can listen to comic couplets, with

such a sad, lean face, i beg you, go out into the garden with him, with whom, sir? with a face. yes, but it would like to listen to the end, to the garden, all to the garden, all to the garden, in general, it has become such an absolutely popular expression, these are comic couplets, haha, which no one really listened to. it must be said that shirvin himself was also a master of comic impromptu, improvisation and even the author of feuilletons, because at that very moment, by the end of the 60s, when he had already become famous, he was entrenched in the role of such a supporting king and king and...

180 see, well, a roughly similar description of shirvint himself, no, the thing is that it’s not similar, blue eyes, blond, five languages, i can swim, shoot, he means that it’s like each actor comes up with something special, in order to better present yourself profitably, to sell yourself profitably, at some point, when such a questionnaire is taken out of the caches, the call rings somewhere at 8 am, and maybe even earlier than 7 am, the call from the acting assistant, and actor by last name. woke up, answers this phone call, they tell him: the square director really wants to see you, please come, he wants to try you in his role, so the actor trudges to the studio, cancels the rehearsal in the theater, and this is always very difficult, he disrupts, disrupts the performance, here in

in the end, he tries out, it doesn’t matter whether he’s a big actor, or a small one, it turns out that his photo, which in the card no longer matches his appearance, everyone has forgotten who he is, and yet even him. ivanov, sidrova’s appearance, as shervent himself concludes this veliton, in general, he

bears little resemblance to any of these types of soviet cinema, yes, he doesn’t seem to fit into the same niche of such a heroic communist, for example, yes, he doesn’t fit , some kind of reflective intellectual, well, somehow he is too ironic to seriously indulge in some kind of reflection, well , at least outwardly this type, as if none of the established roles, even... he doesn’t quite fall into the category of a scientist, because he kind of feels a little, a little bit somehow about it not serious, you can see straight away, but that’s why his heroes work in the translation department or whatever he does there, they do serious work, like botalov, in 9 days of one year or here, here’s lazarev, once again about love, and he’s also a physicist , although it seems not a nuclear scientist, quite a lot of roles there are ones about which we know that he could have played them, but he didn’t, and probably his dream itself, that’s what, the type that he really would have fit, if that’s the type, of course,

is ostapender , and even he wrote that gaida subsequently told him, it’s a pity, it’s a pity that you and i didn’t work in gaidaev’s version, and in zakharov’s version it’s his partner andrei mironov who plays, and he plays this role with shirvint’s personal pipe, and like mironov said shirvint with his dull sparkle in his eyes, this really was movie dream. he could also play in the film a girl with a guitar with gurchenko back in the fifties, with whom he was friends all his life, despite the absolute opposite of temperaments, well, the opposite is not the opposite, but they were both people who could act in comedies, but actually quite often they did this and worked together in gurchenko’s benefit performances, and worked together creating the roles of even shirant himself, and if we remember who he could play. what was practically created for him is also what was considered the main role, the role played by

gaft in the film garage of uuldar ryazanov, well , in general, he had very close friendly relations with rezanov, rezanov, without auditioning, which he thinks shervint really liked, very often called him in his films, even in those films that ultimately did not happen, for example, one of these, well, not the main, but secondary roles, and rezanov offered him when he was preparing the film. robbers a small role i keep remembering ryazanov and maybe a very noticeable although small role in the station for two, and in fact , shirvin even cites ryazanov’s letter in one of his books. i ’m writing to you because i’m afraid to tell you this in person. i have a very small role for you. i ’m retelling it freely now, but i really want you to play it. shirin then wrote: it’s very cool to play episodes with your friends, and directors, good directors, it’s important

that two qualities are combined, your friends and good directors, because they are terribly grateful to you that you save them, and you also have the feeling that you you save them for a small role, for a few minutes in the frame, or maybe you can play a more memorable role for the audience than if you play a long series there, the main thing is to do it successfully, well, in general... for shirvint this is a role in the irony of fate , how he again ranked it all, so he said,

i have five episodes, i could play one main role, i auditioned for two more, quite significant ones, but i didn’t play it all , so that’s the main thing when you play a role , especially a small one to get you the people fell in love, yes, so that you feel this people’s love, the way you feel it, so a traffic cop stops you and lets you go, or something is somehow possible for you.

how to assemble them only at night, so we had to film two nights in a row, because on the first night they decided to sneak real alcohol into the filming, and ryazanov got terribly angry, and he was quite cruel during the filming, even with friends, forced them to come and play it again , and they played it a second time, but according to shirvint’s version, rezanov did take what we see on the screen - this is the same the first night, where wonderful actors play not with... everything professionally, but more realistically, you probably feel it, probably for the viewer it’s also some kind of immersion in the role according to stanislavsky’s system, yes, by this moment, to by the end of the seventies, by the beginning of the eighties, shirvin was really a star, he was famous, despite the fact that those main roles that we

called, maybe not hamlet and not ostap bender, yes, not everything for him, not everything for him. but they didn’t approve it, the point is that shirvint may have already become too big an artist in order to play minor roles, for episodes, yes, he seemed to flash like a star and then went about his business, what is called comeo, that is, when he appears already at this time in the seventies, eighties on the screen , this is an absolute comeo, as in

the film she is self-conscious and attractive, yes, again one of the audience’s favorite films... irina muravyova plays the main role of a girl who should already be getting married, but something, something doesn’t work out , yes, he accidentally meets his old friend, played by tatyana vasilyeva, a psychologist who deals with these very problems of relationships between men and women, according to the scientific method, she is going to help her friend find, which means she has a husband, and the husband, respectively, vasilyeva’s friend is played by shirvint, so shirvint is involved in this scheme.

“i interrupted the rehearsal, she forgot, let’s go, smile at me, just like i told you, susanna told us to, let’s go to the car, susanna is a genius after all, they noticed us, they’re looking at us, there are several people standing there as if paralyzed, and... " wave at them, but susanna allowed, no, then there is no need for any amateur performances, after all, this is science, sit down, quite a lot on the screen, so we see him in such roles,

sometimes creators, well, it’s difficult to call them directly creators, yes, but people associated with '. his famous role is a film performance based on the famous performance of the satire theater zhenib figaron, where he plays count almaviva, actually, yes, here he is, that’s where, much higher, much more.

you self-irony, the gap between the actor and the role, it is really impossible to imagine that we would forget at some point that in front of we are not just a hero, but alexander shirvint, but

from this our pleasure very often increases, yes, it decreases, even in shirvint’s memories of his work in cinema, all the time we see some kind of funny humorous sketches, well as he himself called his memoirs, multiple sclerosis throughout life, yes it is... such a collection of old, well, on the one hand, interviews that he gave in previous years, pieces that he wrote for various press, it’s not like such a coherent story monumental, no, it’s like such a compendium of everything, everything, everything, like a skit, very often even these are aphorisms that are mounted like this, and yes, they said about him that again, even as a director, there is people who make one big piece of work, but it’s just so monolithic, and... there are talents who know how to assemble from different pieces something sparkling, cheerful, varied, never boring, this was precisely

shirvint’s talent , he was a man who was talented in a small form, this means that this was his form, that is, for him, for his acting, directing, authoring talent, those same episodes were the ideal embodiment of his talent, what are your favorite films with his participation? you would remember, well, for me all those films that we mentioned are actually favorites, i don’t even know what else to mention, outside of this series, but for me the role of felix is ​​once again about love, it’s well really very interesting, and in general, here he comes on the screen, as if we were opening a door of some kind of window, but it seems to me that the main function may not be his or...

he doesn’t do anything special, and maybe he doesn’t even play, but just gets into the car, but how does he does this do? and it was a podcast of witnesses from einstein and his leading film historians, natalya ryabchikova and stanislav didinsky. we talk about who and how created our favorite, perhaps half-forgotten or completely unknown soviet films, about how to watch them now and how to get more from them more pleasure. and today we talked about the wonderful and one of our favorite actors, alexander shirvent, who could have turned 90 years old. dvidaniya!

this podcast is a must-read, i’m glana batnikova, this year marks the 105th anniversary of the classic of english literature, writer arya smerdok. today we will talk about her novel "the black prince". the plot at first glance is very simple, there is a hero. an elderly fifty-eight-year-old writer who also worked as a former tax inspector, he dreams of writing a book, is looking for solitude, but at this time - his friends begin to bother his familiar married couple, mm, he begins to understand their relationship and quite unexpectedly falls in love with their twenty-year-old daughter, tries to, well , let's say, seduce her, but at the same time with a serious approach , but his girlfriend leaves him and he ends up in prison. with the accusation of murdering her father, and we are trying to figure out what is behind this relationship, this family system, the writer bogdanova,

hello, hello! please tell me why it is the black prince that is considered a landmark work by murdoch, what is so important about it, what themes are open there, but in my opinion, this is not considered a landmark work by murdoch, because it was a kind of turning point, i would say, a turning point work, a turning point novel in her career, it was very difficult for her, and it is quite unconventional and not similar to her other novels, but in what way it is different, it is different, firstly, it seems to me

that in principle shakespeare loves hamlet , he makes out with his beloved with julian, that is, julian asks him to sort it out, well , how would she be the daughter of his friends, she is the daughter of his very good, bosom friend, that is, it can be said, on the one hand, a friend, a sworn friend, a sworn friend, because on the one hand he is a friend arnold, on the other hand, is a fellow writer and rival, a successful writer in contrast to the protagonist .

in arnold's works, the main character is bradley pearson, and this is exactly how he treats this , so he thinks that this is some kind of nonsense, on the other hand, he envies arnold, and his it’s very captivating that arnold’s daughter says just the opposite: i want to write books similar to your novels, that is, he buys it with a good assessment, well, let’s put it bluntly, with flattery, and

that is, for her. i really want to listen to a lecture about hamlet, plus she herself played hamlet in the production, in fact, hamlet runs like this thread throughout the entire novel, but hamley appears here as a kind of black eros, that is, we see many references in the text to the phrase black eros, then there is kamli coming like black eros into this relationship, it turns out that it is eros that destroys them, or tell me how the plot is built around the karotic.

destructive energy, but also intensity, that is, murdoch also meant intensity, that is, it is so thick, so dense, this is an all-consuming passion and... on the one hand it destroys, on the other hand it gives just the strength for creativity , that is, bradley pearson finally begins to have some kind of inspiration, that is, he begins to write, this is an inextricable part of the destruction of creativity, wait, he starts writing already in prison, when he supposedly killed this arnold, actually killed him rachel, but everything is so confused in this family that in the end it turns out that for some reason this bradley is to blame, he doesn’t even

deny it. especially his guilt, and but, but this whole situation, this whole dark eros, it led him to the fact that he finally sat down to write, what a paradox, he is the whole novel, i laughed a lot at this, of course terrible situation, but i... really laughed, he was ours from the very beginning of the novel, bradley pearson, i wanted a place for solitude to write, i also laughed, i was also re-reading it now, i noticed that all this time a person wants to write a novel, someone always bothers him, some people come all the time, some event in in the end, this is love unexpectedly falling on his head, in the end only in prison, he is finally left alone and can write a book, he and he finally gets a place of solitude, so that where no one disturbs him, and he finally writes this book , yes, that is, after all, his dark eros...

he is such a conscious loner, there he is next to him friends, these rachel and arnold, who seem to be in a wonderful relationship, but at the same time they constantly beat each other, beat each other and eventually kill there, and they say: and we are so happy, we are a happy couple, a happy couple, everything is fine, but at the same

time he gets in from behind the scenes, yes, because he captures their daughter in some kind of relationship that they oppose, it turns out that he gets in on them, one might say, just on a sore spot. jumps in this pair, it looks like it’s a girl, she’s 20 years old, she’s an adult, yes, but for some reason everyone is running around her like a child, in general everyone there has very big problems with responsibility, in fact, the relationship between arnold and rachel is not the only example of some kind of strange marriage in the book, there is also a marriage - the bradley sisters , and her husband roger, who, in general , didn’t want to marry her 20 years ago, but that means ... it happened to him too, he was forced to marry her, and it was a very unhappy marriage, from which priscila keeps running away , in general it ends very badly, so what kind of marriage we don’t take - in this book, it ’s terrible, it’s terrible, it’s destructive, it’s

perverted in its own, in its own, in its own way, in its own way, and even the last marriage - bradley with christian, with christian, yes, he was also not ideal at all, that is, bradley is not happy with him in general... since it ended in nothing, and despite the fact that christian is trying to get him back, somehow bradley himself is not very keen on this relationship, and there is no good heroes, listen, this bradley, look, rache is trying to hook up with him, and mom, this young julian, then him this julian falls in love, well, conventionally, she says, at least, that i love you, then we see that his wife, ex, christian also wants him back, we even read at some point: some kind of analysis, but that’s it this random character francis, who constantly gets in the way there, is some unfortunate brother of his ex-wife, we even see how he hints at some kind of passion, almost arnold for bradley, that

is, we understand what this bradley is like -he’s just a hero-lover in every way, although he’s a tax inspector and an unlucky writer, why would this man seem so boring, in general, according to the description, not handsome, why does he... so stir the souls of all the characters, it seems to me that he does not stir the souls, these are all some kind of fictitious feelings that are attributed to him after the fact. if we take the friend's wife, rachel, i don't think she was in love with him, with bradley. i don’t think there was love there, there was a desire for revenge, there was a desire to somehow make up for this emotional lack, the ex-wife too, she rather wanted attention and something like that.