well, you’re just like nabokov, who says that i’m a writer, i even write love for a stool, yes, but that’s how it works, that is, it’s impossible, well, in a good way, it’s clear that there are different situations and sometimes it doesn’t work out, but this it’s just that the reader feels when the author lives as a hero, or does not live as a hero, when the author feels what the hero experiences, when the author simply sketched out some, i don’t know, formulaic image and left it like that, but let it go, this is on the one hand, on the other hand, if we talk about... specifically about the novel, the black principle, there basically there are no reliable narrators, that's the game itself, it's a murdock game, a name game, uh-huh, there we don't know if we can trust bradley with his story, because we have four more afterwords, where each minor character tells his own version, rachel says, that in fact bradley is crazy, and that means he harassed her in every possible way, in general, it was really he who was pursuing her, and the ex-wife also says, which means

that there are references to hamlet, but there are also references to myths and clato, absolutely, and murdoch as once i really loved and studied plato and eros, yes this question, and that is , there is a lot of darkness here, namely, talk about the connection between creativity and eros, but still , i think creativity wins, that is , in the end there is no love as such, and there is no truth there, there is just... wait, well, let's figure it out, this hero bradley, we first see him as so boring, he grumbles all the time, he is dissatisfied all the time, he is an introvert who really wants to be left alone, all people irritate him, he says they are constantly rude, i don’t want to see you, go away, leave me alone, and he seems cynical, he seems callous, suddenly, when he awakens to fall in love with this girl, who is younger than him by 38 years old, he suddenly becomes super romantic, that is , he... begins to talk about love as something,

almost a temple, almost god, in which he believes, yes, that is, there is a very strong intensity of emotions, but during this period, and we stop recognizing him, in this sense, this novel is dark, it is a little upside down, because at first we think that he such a person, and then suddenly it turns out that he so gentle and he believes, as you correctly noted, even in prison, that julian still loves him, and he even almost takes on... this murder of arnold is simple because he feels guilty for he destroyed and somehow destroyed the psyche of this poor girl, but at the same time it turns out that the event because of which all this started is not worth what you think such a reaction is, because well , well, well, the girl, well, got carried away, maybe she’s a teacher institute, which is older, this is a popular story, why suddenly this climbs into sidelines, yes, or... faustianism,

even, yes, some kind of black beginnings, dark eros, here on the one hand, again, i don’t think we can talk about true love on his part, he fell in love again the same image, you and i said that before that he knew julienne, he did not see this beauty in her, but a certain moment happened, these lectures about hamlet, and something turned upside down in him, and he saw her from a completely different side , he saw a certain image, he fell in love with the image, and through it he realized himself. your own - creative beginning creative beginning, yes, where does this darkness of nabokovism come from, well, it’s about impossible love, and why is it so impossible, it’s not very clear, it’s impossible, it seems to me, on the one hand it’s understandable, if you think about it logically, it’s possible, but with that intensity with that madness, what is happening there for the character is even some kind of absurdity, that is, this very situation is intensified to the point of absurdity, and there is logic in the actions of the characters.

no, listen, why is murdoch so cool, that is, why do we respect her at all, why do we still read about her? are we talking? murdoch is a very great, it seems to me, a literary philosopher, cool, by the way, i agree... that is, she has so many meanings built into her novels, so many layers, so many subtexts, in each of them, you can talk about each of them talk endlessly, and pulls out an infinite number of meanings, plus different forms, different tools and forms, for example, how she builds the narrative itself, how it was done, it was very, well, it remains very cool and so unique and did a great job on it truly classic literature in general, although it can be mistaken for a detective story, for fiction, but in the end there is an intensity of passions, there is seduction, there is murder, that is, we can say that it operates with rather pop genre techniques, no, but due to this we ...