with democrats, happening right now with democrats, a lot of— happening right now with democrats, a lot of very— happening right now with democrats, a lot of very pro — happening right now with democrats, a lot of very pro israel— happening right now with democrats, a lot of very pro israel democrats - a lot of very pro israel democrats have _ a lot of very pro israel democrats have come — a lot of very pro israel democrats have come out— a lot of very pro israel democrats have come out and _ a lot of very pro israel democrats have come out and said - a lot of very pro israel democrats have come out and said that- a lot of very pro israel democrats have come out and said that theyi a lot of very pro israel democrats - have come out and said that they are going _ have come out and said that they are going to _ have come out and said that they are going to oppose _ have come out and said that they are going to oppose it. _ have come out and said that they are going to oppose it. try— have come out and said that they are going to oppose it, try to— have come out and said that they are going to oppose it, try to keep the l going to oppose it, try to keep the democratic— going to oppose it, try to keep the democratic party— going to oppose it, try to keep the democratic party together. - going to oppose it, try to keep the democratic party together. and i democratic party together. and so israel. _ democratic party together. and so israel. most— democratic party together. and so israel, most members _ democratic party together. and so israel, most members of- democratic party together. and sol israel, most members of congress want _ israel, most members of congress want this_ israel, most members of congress want this israel— israel, most members of congress want this israel aid _ israel, most members of congress want this israel aid to _ israel, most members of congress want this israel aid to pass- israel, most members of congress want this israel aid to pass but- israel, most members of congress want this israel aid to pass but thei want this israel aid to pass but the question— want this israel aid to pass but the question is— want this israel aid to pass but the question is how— want this israel aid to pass but the question is how is _ want this israel aid to pass but the question is how is it— want this israel aid to pass but the question is how is it going - want this israel aid to pass but the question is how is it going to- question is how is it going to pass and what — question is how is it going to pass and what are _ question is how is it going to pass and what are the _ question is how is it going to pass and what are the conditions - question is how is it going to pass and what are the conditions for. question is how is it going to pass and what are the conditions for it| and what are the conditions for it to pass? — and what are the conditions for it to pass? and _ and what are the conditions for it to pass? and that's _ and what are the conditions for it to pass? and that's very- and what are the conditions for it - to pass? and that's very complicated yeah _ to pass? and that's very complicated ear. ,, , . , ., . , year. seen pictures of donald trump and i really — year. seen pictures of donald trump and i really tonight _ year. seen pictures of donald trump and i really tonight in _ year. seen pictures of donald trump and i really tonight in washington, l and i really tonight in washington, is it, oh, he is in houston, i'm being told. and obviously not a fan of the irs. the issue of how to fund israel spending taking $14 billion out of the irs budget, i must say i don't understand that because if you are fiscally conservative, you want people to pay their taxes and want the irs to collect taxes initially that the quickest way to reduce the

deficit? knew the way they want to reduce the deficit is to reduce government spending. deficit is to reduce government sendina. . ~ , , deficit is to reduce government sendina. . ~' , spending. there are scorekeepers of concress spending. there are scorekeepers of congress who _ spending. there are scorekeepers of congress who analyse _ spending. there are scorekeepers of congress who analyse how _ spending. there are scorekeepers of congress who analyse how much - spending. there are scorekeepers of. congress who analyse how much each piece of— congress who analyse how much each piece of legislation— congress who analyse how much each piece of legislation is— congress who analyse how much each piece of legislation is going _ congress who analyse how much each piece of legislation is going to- piece of legislation is going to cost, — piece of legislation is going to cost, they— piece of legislation is going to cost, they actually— piece of legislation is going to cost, they actually say- piece of legislation is going to cost, they actually say it's - piece of legislation is going to. cost, they actually say it's going to add _ cost, they actually say it's going to add $12 — cost, they actually say it's going to add $12 billion _ cost, they actually say it's going to add $12 billion to _ cost, they actually say it's going to add $12 billion to the - cost, they actually say it's going to add $12 billion to the deficit l to add $12 billion to the deficit over— to add $12 billion to the deficit over the — to add $12 billion to the deficit over the next— to add $12 billion to the deficit over the next decade, - to add $12 billion to the deficit over the next decade, and - to add $12 billion to the deficit over the next decade, and sol to add $12 billion to the deficit. over the next decade, and so it's actually— over the next decade, and so it's actually not _ over the next decade, and so it's actually not going _ over the next decade, and so it's actually not going to _ over the next decade, and so it's actually not going to save - over the next decade, and so it's actually not going to save any. actually not going to save any money — actually not going to save any money and _ actually not going to save any money. and so, _ actually not going to save any money. and so, you - actually not going to save any money. and so, you know, i actually not going to save any. money. and so, you know, this actually not going to save any- money. and so, you know, this isn't really— money. and so, you know, this isn't really a _ money. and so, you know, this isn't really a cost — money. and so, you know, this isn't really a cost savings _ money. and so, you know, this isn't really a cost savings measure, - money. and so, you know, this isn't really a cost savings measure, this. really a cost savings measure, this is more _ really a cost savings measure, this is more of— really a cost savings measure, this is more of a — really a cost savings measure, this is more of a political— really a cost savings measure, this is more of a political measure - really a cost savings measure, this is more of a political measure and| is more of a political measure and it's not— is more of a political measure and it's not really— is more of a political measure and it's not really a _ is more of a political measure and it's not really a serious— is more of a political measure and it's not really a serious effort - is more of a political measure and it's not really a serious effort to l it's not really a serious effort to pass _ it's not really a serious effort to pass for— it's not really a serious effort to pass for israel. _ it's not really a serious effort to pass for israel.— pass for israel. when it's bill makes it _ pass for israel. when it's bill makes it way _ pass for israel. when it's bill makes it way through - pass for israel. when it's bill makes it way through and i pass for israel. when it's bill. makes it way through and gets vetoed, is there a majority

bipartisan majority that would get eventually ukraine funding through? yet, there absolutely is. and that's still the _ yet, there absolutely is. and that's still the challenge, _ yet, there absolutely is. and that's still the challenge, is— yet, there absolutely is. and that's still the challenge, is that - yet, there absolutely is. and that's still the challenge, is that there - still the challenge, is that there is a minority— still the challenge, is that there is a minority in— still the challenge, is that there is a minority in the _ still the challenge, is that there is a minority in the republican . is a minority in the republican majority— is a minority in the republican majority in _ is a minority in the republican majority in the _ is a minority in the republican majority in the house - is a minority in the republican majority in the house of - majority in the house of representatives- majority in the house of representatives who . majority in the house of. representatives who don't majority in the house of - representatives who don't want majority in the house of _ representatives who don't want this ukraine _ representatives who don't want this ukraine funding _ representatives who don't want this ukraine funding. so— representatives who don't want this ukraine funding. so they— representatives who don't want this ukraine funding. so they are - representatives who don't want this ukraine funding. so they are really. ukraine funding. so they are really dictating _ ukraine funding. so they are really dictating the — ukraine funding. so they are really dictating the terms _ ukraine funding. so they are really dictating the terms here. - ukraine funding. so they are really dictating the terms here. the - dictating the terms here. the i"and-new— dictating the terms here. the brand—new speaker— dictating the terms here. the brand—new speaker of- dictating the terms here. the brand—new speaker of the - dictating the terms here. the . brand—new speaker of the house dictating the terms here. the - brand—new speaker of the house who has been _ brand—new speaker of the house who has been on — brand—new speaker of the house who has been on the — brand—new speaker of the house who has been on the job _ brand—new speaker of the house who has been on the job for— brand—new speaker of the house who has been on the job for six _ brand—new speaker of the house who has been on the job for six days nowi has been on the job for six days now doesn't _ has been on the job for six days now doesn't want — has been on the job for six days now doesn't want to _ has been on the job for six days now doesn't want to upset _ has been on the job for six days now doesn't want to upset the _ has been on the job for six days now doesn't want to upset the people . has been on the job for six days now. doesn't want to upset the people who have but— doesn't want to upset the people who have put him — doesn't want to upset the people who have put him in— doesn't want to upset the people who have put him in power. _ doesn't want to upset the people who have put him in power. and _ doesn't want to upset the people who have put him in power. and passing l have put him in power. and passing legislation— have put him in power. and passing legislation with _ have put him in power. and passing legislation with the _ have put him in power. and passing legislation with the support - legislation with the support of democrats _ legislation with the support of democrats is _ legislation with the support of democrats is a _ legislation with the support of democrats is a good - legislation with the support of democrats is a good way - legislation with the support of democrats is a good way to i legislation with the support of. democrats is a good way to upset republicans _ democrats is a good way to upset republicans. and _ democrats is a good way to upset republicans. and so _ democrats is a good way to upset republicans. and so it— democrats is a good way to upset republicans. and so it will- democrats is a good way to upset republicans. and so it will have l republicans. and so it will have to id republicans. and so it will have to go through— republicans. and so it will have to go through these _ republicans. and so it will have to go through these semantics - republicans. and so it will have to| go through these semantics before there _ go through these semantics before there is— go through these semantics before there is a _ go through these semantics before there is a final— go through these semantics before there is a final resolution. - go through these semantics before there is a final resolution.- there is a final resolution. yeah, we shouldn't _ there is a final resolution. yeah, we shouldn't forget, _ there is a final resolution. yeah, we shouldn't forget, justin, - there is a final resolution. yeah, we shouldn't forget, justin, that | there is a final resolution. yeah, l we shouldn't forget, justin, that in we shouldn't forget, justin, that in a couple weeks' time they are going to keep government open and approve a federal budget. there is a political process and a dance going on here which will delay israel and ukraine funding, but we heard as i

said from the ukrainian mp who said, we need this money now. and there are signs aren't there, on the battlefield, that there is now another russian push on the way. and the ability to fight that is being hampered. l the ability to fight that is being ham ered. ., the ability to fight that is being hamered. ., _ the ability to fight that is being hampered-— the ability to fight that is being hamered. ., . ,, . hampered. i would say, that russian ush has hampered. i would say, that russian push has been _ hampered. i would say, that russian push has been one _ hampered. i would say, that russian push has been one of— hampered. i would say, that russian push has been one of the _ hampered. i would say, that russian push has been one of the worst - push has been one of the worst operations by the russians so far, in terms of losses, if you look at the horrific nature of the way they've undertaken that. but ukraine, ultimately, using the word today, but they are in a stalemate with russia. it's interesting, it's a word that western backers of ukraine have been avoiding but ukraine have been avoiding but ukraine itself used it today. of course russia is very much emboldened. short of ukrainian breakthrough that looks remote now, very much emboldened to hang on because from the rush from point of view if you're in their shoes, ukraine's biggest backer isn't even unable to pass its budget and

confirm there will be money and supplies, there will be a future commitment to ukraine. of course western backers of ukraine while they are externally extremely positive that support will continue for your ukraine, you have to consider of course if the us was to stall or pull out they would essentially be quite nervous about continuing this, certainly very least increase pressure for talks for some sort of settlement to renew the problem. especially when israel is going on and the third part of that unholy trinity of that crises, that unholy trinity of that crises, that china and taiwan signing, the light behind all this. there is certainly an eye on notjust ukraine is a crisis but israel and everything else all tied up with this and the lack of progress, we understand the political dance in dc around this, we always have this fear that it will come right at the last minute and it will be ok, but what if it's not? and certainly the

us' adversaries are looking at this very closely, at this significant time of us failure and weakness. yeah, we know what donald trump's position on ukraine is, because he's made that pretty clear in recent weeks. donald trump not in new york, instead in texas, we'll talk about him perhaps a little later,. there we have donald trump in houston on the campaign trailand we have donald trump in houston on the campaign trail and looking for all the world like he will be the republican candidate come the summit next year. in the last few minutes, the british prime minister rishi sunak has wrapped up a two day ai summit at bletchley park, with an in depth discussion with the billionaire and tech investor elon musk. we are told it was a wide ranging discussion in front of a very select audience, an interview that will be

released on twitter. and we are very pleased to say we can speak to ai entrepreneur priya lakhani who hosted that event. i can't get used to calling it x. do you ask or do you treat now, i don't know, who exes? do tell us what you heard, is it everything that you expected? it’s heard, is it everything that you exnected?_ expected? it's my favourite programme- _ expected? it's my favourite programme. but _ expected? it's my favourite programme. but yes, - expected? it's my favourite programme. but yes, no i expected? it's my favourite programme. but yes, no it| expected? it's my favourite - programme. but yes, no it wasn't expected? it's my favourite _ programme. but yes, no it wasn't him it was much more balanced, christian, then i was expecting a little more doom and gloom from elon musk but he was very balanced about the opportunities as well as the potential threats. the opportunities as well as the potentialthreats. it the opportunities as well as the potential threats. it was particularly interesting when the first time that elon musk likened the situation of regulation to a sports game, he said he actually agreed with most of regulation, he said silicon valley tends not to but

having a referee is a good thing. and he said in a sports game, you don't say, there is a referee there to ensure every player is acting with sports and like good conduct. and the second thing i think he said that was really interesting was he said that we are seeing the most disruptive force in human history in terms of this technology. there will come a point that no job is come a point that nojob is needed, and i don't know if that makes people uncomfortable or if it makes them comfortable and the whole room laughed. i can tell you right now the state laugh was uneasy and uncomfortable. and the other thing he did is he likened to a value to a magic gina. but there is no three wish nonsense limit, you can ask for anything you like in the future. the debate will not be about being a universal basic income, it will be about you having a universal high income. and the prime minister picked up on a very interesting

phrase. the prime minister himself said that the passive aip's he is most excited about is education, elon musk talked about education a few times himself, he'll have the world's best patient tutor elon musk said and again that got a few laughs. finally musk said the two best places in the world where ai development is taking place is number one, silicon valley, and number one, silicon valley, and number two, number one, silicon valley, and numbertwo, london. he said number one, silicon valley, and number two, london. he said that several times so it there was a bit of celebration, i think the prime minister said... of celebration, i think the prime minister said. . ._ minister said... that will be the floors the _ minister said... that will be the floors the prime _ minister said... that will be the floors the prime minister - minister said... that will be the floors the prime minister was i minister said... that will be the - floors the prime minister was hoping for. the worst of the concerns that number ten should have been costing up number ten should have been costing up to x, and particularly how elon musk was running it. yes, he's invested a lot in technology and of course he has some links to chat gpt but was he the right person to close it? i

but was he the right person to close it? ., ., , ., , , it? i would answer, the answer is es, the it? i would answer, the answer is yes. the simple _ it? i would answer, the answer is yes, the simple reason _ it? i would answer, the answer is yes, the simple reason is - it? i would answer, the answer is| yes, the simple reason is because it? i would answer, the answer is l yes, the simple reason is because i think the best way to mitigate risk with artificial intelligence is to ensure that everyone of us, every consumer, is a better consumer of artificial intelligence. if we understand it a bit more we don't need to learn the maths and how to code, if we understand it we will be better consumers, ask the right questions about data, about bias, about disinformation, about determination, because we need to do that. regulation is always catching up that. regulation is always catching up with innovation. someone with such a big draw like elon musk you are going to have the wider public interested in that conversation and i think we're going to see that when it does stream on 10 to in terms of the lot number of followers. sparking that conversation between the regular public i think is the most important thing, sol the regular public i think is the most important thing, so i think that was a good decision. you'll see this when you watch the stream, is the prime minister was very comfortable. he was very very comfortable. he was very very comfortable speaking on this agenda, and i think number ten was obviously

very confident that would be the case, not only was it deter serious conversation and elon musk to talk about, he addressed this information, you talked about open communities and community notes, but the prime minister was very comfortable leading on that agenda and i think number ten is important to say, you know, here's a prime minister who is able to leave on something that could create an existential threat in the future. leanne caldwell, that is interesting, he is geeky when it comes to ai, and he is quite a bit younger than president biden. i had of this summit they put the executive order out about how they were going to pretest some of the ai systems as they were being developed. ijust systems as they were being developed. i just wonder, systems as they were being developed. ijust wonder, when this starts playing tomorrow on twitter, inevitably will, it will be picked up inevitably will, it will be picked up widely. whether politically that becomes a bit difficult forjoe biden. i becomes a bit difficult forjoe biden. ., �* ~ .,

becomes a bit difficult forjoe biden. ~ ., , , biden. i don't know if it becomes difficult for _ biden. i don't know if it becomes difficult forjoe _ biden. i don't know if it becomes difficult forjoe biden, _ biden. i don't know if it becomes difficult forjoe biden, this - biden. i don't know if it becomes difficult forjoe biden, this is - difficult forjoe biden, this is obviously not an issue that he is necessarily— obviously not an issue that he is necessarily leading on, the united states— necessarily leading on, the united states is— necessarily leading on, the united states is quite behind on this issue of al _ states is quite behind on this issue of al the — states is quite behind on this issue of al. the senate majority, chuck schumer— of al. the senate majority, chuck schumer of— of al. the senate majority, chuck schumer of new york, he compiled a similar— schumer of new york, he compiled a similar form — schumer of new york, he compiled a similar form a couple months ago, elon similar form a couple months ago, eton musk— similar form a couple months ago, elon musk with darker mics zuckerberg was there, it was behind closed _ zuckerberg was there, it was behind closed doors and it was these leaders — closed doors and it was these leaders talking about al. it's funny because _ leaders talking about al. it's funny because what elon musk said there is very similar— because what elon musk said there is very similar i — because what elon musk said there is very similar i was told, he said in the middle — very similar i was told, he said in the middle of the room, he is kind of doomsday on the issue. so now the united _ of doomsday on the issue. so now the united states is trying to like catch — united states is trying to like catch up— united states is trying to like catch up not only on the regulation component — catch up not only on the regulation component of it but also on the investment component as well. congress — investment component as well. congress and the white house, i'm told, _ congress and the white house, i'm told, understand the need for the united _ told, understand the need for the united states to invest and not to fall behind on this, but then there's. _ fall behind on this, but then there's, like i said, the regulation

component, too, and the united states— component, too, and the united states congress has been very bad at regulating _ states congress has been very bad at regulating technology. they are trying, — regulating technology. they are trying, there in the very beginning stages _ trying, there in the very beginning stages right now, but it's going to be a big _ stages right now, but it's going to be a big challenge for them. yeah, and an immediate _ be a big challenge for them. yeah, and an immediate challenge - be a big challenge for them. yeah, and an immediate challenge for. be a big challenge for them. yeah, and an immediate challenge for allj and an immediate challenge for all the governments that are concerned. it was part of remarkable i thought that we had the chinese vice premier on the same stage having a commitment together, but i noticed today as they started to talk about national security and defence in the ai realm suddenly the chinese were excluded, and i guess from a defence perspective which you are most interested in it that's where it gets quite scary. yes interested in it that's where it gets quite scary-— interested in it that's where it gets quite scary. yes it does, and any amount _ gets quite scary. yes it does, and any amount of— gets quite scary. yes it does, and any amount of regulation - gets quite scary. yes it does, and any amount of regulation or - gets quite scary. yes it does, and - any amount of regulation or consumer application _ any amount of regulation or consumer application is — any amount of regulation or consumer application is one _ any amount of regulation or consumer application is one thing, _ any amount of regulation or consumer application is one thing, of— any amount of regulation or consumer application is one thing, of course - application is one thing, of course the super— application is one thing, of course the super applications— application is one thing, of course the super applications to - application is one thing, of course the super applications to which i the super applications to which these — the super applications to which these powerful— the super applications to which these powerful tools— the super applications to which these powerful tools will- the super applications to which these powerful tools will be . the super applications to which| these powerful tools will be put the super applications to which - these powerful tools will be put and we've _ these powerful tools will be put and we've also _ these powerful tools will be put and we've also gotten _

these powerful tools will be put and we've also gotten quantum - these powerful tools will be put and - we've also gotten quantum community, quantum _ we've also gotten quantum community, quantum communications _ we've also gotten quantum community, quantum communications and - we've also gotten quantum community, quantum communications and of - we've also gotten quantum community, quantum communications and of the . quantum communications and of the things— quantum communications and of the things like _ quantum communications and of the things like that — quantum communications and of the things like that and _ quantum communications and of the things like that and that _ quantum communications and of the things like that and that high—tech . things like that and that high—tech emerging — things like that and that high—tech emerging so — things like that and that high—tech emerging so rapidly— things like that and that high—tech emerging so rapidly and _ things like that and that high—tech emerging so rapidly and is - things like that and that high—tech emerging so rapidly and is nice - things like that and that high—tech emerging so rapidly and is nice to| emerging so rapidly and is nice to see corporations _ emerging so rapidly and is nice to see corporations these _ emerging so rapidly and is nice to see corporations these biggest i emerging so rapidly and is nice to i see corporations these biggest fears and it's— see corporations these biggest fears and it's always — see corporations these biggest fears and it's always this _ see corporations these biggest fears and it's always this biggest - and it's always this biggest question— and it's always this biggest question about _ and it's always this biggest question about how- and it's always this biggest question about how we - and it's always this biggest. question about how we would and it's always this biggest - question about how we would handle it, in question about how we would handle it. in fact _ question about how we would handle it. in fact i _ question about how we would handle it. infact i did— question about how we would handle it, in fact i did work for— question about how we would handle it, in fact i did work for their- it, in fact i did work for their development _ it, in fact i did work for their development concepts- it, in fact i did work for their development concepts and i it, in fact i did work for their- development concepts and doctrines centre _ development concepts and doctrines centre within — development concepts and doctrines centre within the _ development concepts and doctrines centre within the uk _ development concepts and doctrines centre within the uk staff— development concepts and doctrines centre within the uk staff college i centre within the uk staff college on how— centre within the uk staff college on how at — centre within the uk staff college on how ai would _ centre within the uk staff college on how ai would develop - centre within the uk staff college| on how ai would develop between centre within the uk staff college - on how ai would develop between now and 2050 _ on how ai would develop between now and 2050 there — on how ai would develop between now and 2050. there are _ on how ai would develop between now and 2050. there are so _ on how ai would develop between now and 2050. there are so many- and 2050. there are so many branching _ and 2050. there are so many branching points— and 2050. there are so many branching points about - and 2050. there are so many branching points about how. and 2050. there are so many. branching points about how you and 2050. there are so many- branching points about how you need to make _ branching points about how you need to make decisions, _ branching points about how you need to make decisions, deregulate - to make decisions, deregulate nationally. _ to make decisions, deregulate nationally, other— to make decisions, deregulate nationally, other countries - to make decisions, deregulate i nationally, other countries don't regulate. — nationally, other countries don't regulate. they— nationally, other countries don't regulate, theyjump _ nationally, other countries don't regulate, theyjump ahead, - nationally, other countries don't regulate, theyjump ahead, and| nationally, other countries don't - regulate, theyjump ahead, and they invent— regulate, theyjump ahead, and they invent things — regulate, theyjump ahead, and they invent things that _ regulate, theyjump ahead, and they invent things that you _ regulate, theyjump ahead, and they invent things that you can't - regulate, theyjump ahead, and they invent things that you can't protect l invent things that you can't protect yourself— invent things that you can't protect yourself against _ invent things that you can't protect yourself against. we _ invent things that you can't protect yourself against. we can't - invent things that you can't protect yourself against. we can't stop - yourself against. we can't stop ai from _ yourself against. we can't stop ai from reaching _ yourself against. we can't stop ai from reaching here, _ yourself against. we can't stop ai from reaching here, it's— yourself against. we can't stop ai from reaching here, it's not- yourself against. we can't stop ai from reaching here, it's not a - from reaching here, it's not a physical— from reaching here, it's not a physical product— from reaching here, it's not a physical product you - from reaching here, it's not a physical product you can - from reaching here, it's not a physical product you can stop from reaching here, it's not a . physical product you can stop at customs — physical product you can stop at customs its— physical product you can stop at customs. it's great _ physical product you can stop at customs. it's great to _ physical product you can stop at customs. it's great to see - physical product you can stop at customs. it's great to see world efforts — customs. it's great to see world efforts but — customs. it's great to see world efforts but nations _ customs. it's great to see world efforts but nations will- customs. it's great to see world efforts but nations will push - efforts but nations will push boundaries _ efforts but nations will push boundaries on _ efforts but nations will push boundaries on to _ efforts but nations will push boundaries on to what - efforts but nations will push boundaries on to what has l boundaries on to what has acceptable _ boundaries on to what has acceptable. that - boundaries on to what has acceptable. that is - boundaries on to what has acceptable. that is the - boundaries on to what has . acceptable. that is the world boundaries on to what has - acceptable. that is the world we're entering _ acceptable. that is the world we're entering in — acceptable. that is the world we're entering in and _ acceptable. that is the world we're entering in and i— acceptable. that is the world we're entering in and i think— acceptable. that is the world we're entering in and i think that - acceptable. that is the world we're entering in and i think that very- entering in and i think that very much _ entering in and i think that very much underpins _ entering in and i think that very much underpins these - entering in and i think that very- much underpins these conversations and we _ much underpins these conversations and we did _ much underpins these conversations and we did get— much underpins these conversations and we did get it— much underpins these conversations and we did get it wrong _ much underpins these conversations and we did get it wrong on - much underpins these conversations and we did get it wrong on social- and we did get it wrong on social media _ and we did get it wrong on social media we — and we did get it wrong on social media we didn't _ and we did get it wrong on social media we didn't think— and we did get it wrong on social media we didn't think about - and we did get it wrong on social media we didn't think about the i media we didn't think about the regulation — media we didn't think about the regulation we _ media we didn't think about the regulation we didn't _ media we didn't think about the regulation we didn't think -

media we didn't think about the regulation we didn't think about media we didn't think about the - regulation we didn't think about the harms _ regulation we didn't think about the harms to— regulation we didn't think about the harms to which _ regulation we didn't think about the harms to which some _ regulation we didn't think about the harms to which some of _ regulation we didn't think about the harms to which some of this - harms to which some of this technology— harms to which some of this technology could _ harms to which some of this technology could be - harms to which some of this technology could be put - harms to which some of this technology could be put and harms to which some of this - technology could be put and we're playing _ technology could be put and we're playing catch _ technology could be put and we're playing catch up _ technology could be put and we're playing catch up now. _ technology could be put and we're playing catch up now. regulation. playing catch up now. regulation exactly _ playing catch up now. regulation exactly not — playing catch up now. regulation exactly not enough _ playing catch up now. regulation exactly not enough great - playing catch up now. regulation exactly not enough great that - playing catch up now. regulation. exactly not enough great that we've -ot exactly not enough great that we've got to _ exactly not enough great that we've got to sumer — exactly not enough great that we've got to sumer education _ exactly not enough great that we've got to sumer education i'd - exactly not enough great that we've got to sumer education i'd like - exactly not enough great that we've got to sumer education i'd like to. got to sumer education i'd like to believe _ got to sumer education i'd like to believe we — got to sumer education i'd like to believe we will— got to sumer education i'd like to believe we will get _ got to sumer education i'd like to believe we will get ahead - got to sumer education i'd like to believe we will get ahead of- got to sumer education i'd like to believe we will get ahead of that| believe we will get ahead of that but i believe we will get ahead of that but i think— believe we will get ahead of that but i think that _ believe we will get ahead of that but i think that will— believe we will get ahead of that but i think that will be _ believe we will get ahead of that but i think that will be a - but i think that will be a struggle in itself— but i think that will be a struggle in itself and _ but i think that will be a struggle in itself and of _ but i think that will be a struggle in itself and of course _ but i think that will be a struggle in itself and of course we - but i think that will be a struggle in itself and of course we have i in itself and of course we have hostile — in itself and of course we have hostile action _ in itself and of course we have hostile action using _ in itself and of course we have hostile action using these - in itself and of course we have l hostile action using these tools, in itself and of course we have - hostile action using these tools, so a very— hostile action using these tools, so a very completed _ hostile action using these tools, so a very completed landscape. - hostile action using these tools, so a very completed landscape. his i a very completed landscape. his white a very completed landscape. white rishi sunak said at a very completed landscape. i—iiii: white rishi sunak said at the a very completed landscape.- white rishi sunak said at the 620 white rishi sunak said at the g20 recently come if they are going to be such a big player in this, china, we need to keep talking. so you can have your trade barriers and what have your trade barriers and what have your trade barriers and what have you but on this area or in this area, you need to keep the communication channels working. the beauty of ai is you can bring people back to life. and today we have been treated to the last beatles song. paul and ringo — plus the others. have a listen. # now and then i miss you # 0h, now and then

# i want you to be there for me.# before i ask you who your bringing back to life on al, which really interesting about that is how the audio has been cleaned up, how clean it is. , �* audio has been cleaned up, how clean itis. , �* . it is. sorry i couldn't quite catch the question. _ it is. sorry i couldn't quite catch the question. how _ it is. sorry i couldn't quite catch the question. how clean - it is. sorry i couldn't quite catch the question. how clean the - it is. sorry i couldn't quite catch i the question. how clean the audio is, the question. how clean the audio is. obviously _ the question. how clean the audio is, obviously this _ the question. how clean the audio is, obviously this music _ the question. how clean the audio is, obviously this music was - the question. how clean the audio | is, obviously this music was written some time ago but the fact they cleaned it all up using ai, that's the beauty of it right?— cleaned it all up using ai, that's the beauty of it right? that's the beau of the beauty of it right? that's the beauty of artificial _ the beauty of it right? that's the beauty of artificial intelligent - the beauty of it right? that's the| beauty of artificial intelligent and this is what musk was trying to make the point about. it's about having

that ability to basically do anything, whatever you wish for, whatever you want to see,... the genie in a bottle thing. absolutely. we can think of all sorts of wonderful ways that are fun and useful that we might use the technology but you know at the same time, i don't know, but we want to think about all the ethics. in terms of what's right and what's not right, using images and etc. it's a fascinating moment we are living in. who are you bringing back to life? that's her i'm going to say, i'm going to have to think about that i'm afraid, and come back next week. i'll give you a pass, you can come back on our new thursday segment that she will be on this week, will be excited about that, thank you so much for your time this evening. 10 one will be with us next week.

we're going to talk about donjunior being in court in new york but you want to talk about a hearing in colorado. 0n the basis of the 14th amendment�*s opponents want to strike donald trump from the ballot in colorado, where is that going? there's a case that's been happening all week— there's a case that's been happening all week long to take him off the ballot _ all week long to take him off the ballot because of the 14th amendment which in _ ballot because of the 14th amendment which i'm going to read a portion of it, which i'm going to read a portion of it. why— which i'm going to read a portion of it. why it— which i'm going to read a portion of it, why it would matter. real quickly— it, why it would matter. real quickly if— it, why it would matter. real quickly if i can get to it. it says that— quickly if i can get to it. it says that any— quickly if i can get to it. it says that any officeholder essentially takes _ that any officeholder essentially takes an— that any officeholder essentially takes an oath, member of congress, etc. takes an oath, member of congress, etc must— takes an oath, member of congress, etc. must support the constitution of the _ etc. must support the constitution of the united states and not engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the government. and so that is why this case _ the government. and so that is why this case for— the government. and so that is why this case for colorado, there are citizens— this case for colorado, there are citizens that want donald trump removed from the ballot, the presidential ballot in colorado because — presidential ballot in colorado

because of his role onjanuary six. and so— because of his role onjanuary six. and so that — because of his role onjanuary six. and so that has been happening all week _ and so that has been happening all week it _ and so that has been happening all week. it might be a long shot, we will see. — week. it might be a long shot, we will see, but if this case is successful, you can expect that to p0p successful, you can expect that to pop up— successful, you can expect that to pop up in— successful, you can expect that to pop up in other states as well. well two things. — pop up in other states as well. well two things, would _ pop up in other states as well. all two things, would he need colour pop up in other states as well. ,ll two things, would he need colour out of? because republicans don't hold colorado in the presidential election any more, we need colorado to become president if he wasn't on the ballot there? and secondly, from all the court cases that we've seen, obviously the case that we're talking about today, it doesn't seem to have any effect does it? he's just going up and up and up in the polls. just going up and up and up in the olls. , ., .., polls. there will this one could actually have _ polls. there will this one could actually have a _ polls. there will this one could actually have a practical- polls. there will this one could actually have a practical effect| polls. there will this one could l actually have a practical effect if it takes — actually have a practical effect if it takes him off the ballot, colorado is a blue state, is becoming more blue, it used to be swing. _ becoming more blue, it used to be swing, purplish. joe biden will likely— swing, purplish. joe biden will likely wind colorado so probably it will not _

likely wind colorado so probably it will not impact donald trump's chances — will not impact donald trump's chances at winning in 2024. but if this expands to other states it could — this expands to other states it could very well have a... like where, michigan? _ could very well have a... like where, michigan? yeah, - could very well have a... like where, michigan? yeah, it. could very well have a... like - where, michigan? yeah, it michigan, --erhas in where, michigan? yeah, it michigan, perhaps in north _ where, michigan? yeah, it michigan, perhaps in north carolina _ where, michigan? yeah, it michigan, perhaps in north carolina 14th - perhaps in north carolina 14th amendment, it could happen, this is amendment, it could happen, this is a federal— amendment, it could happen, this is a federal law that they are bringing this up— a federal law that they are bringing this up and they could, regardless if there _ this up and they could, regardless if there are — this up and they could, regardless if there are any challengers in that state _ if there are any challengers in that state in _ if there are any challengers in that state in 2020, this could be brought up state in 2020, this could be brought up in _ state in 2020, this could be brought up in any— state in 2020, this could be brought up in any of— state in 2020, this could be brought up in any of the states. | state in 2020, this could be brought up in any of the states.— up in any of the states. i really want to watch, _ up in any of the states. i really want to watch, when _ up in any of the states. i really want to watch, when do - up in any of the states. i really want to watch, when do we - up in any of the states. i really| want to watch, when do we get a result? filth want to watch, when do we get a result? . �* . . want to watch, when do we get a result? . �* , . ., ., , ., result? oh that's a good question. i don't know. — result? oh that's a good question. i don't know. i'll _ result? oh that's a good question. i don't know, i'll get _ result? oh that's a good question. i don't know, i'll get back— result? oh that's a good question. i don't know, i'll get back to - result? oh that's a good question. i don't know, i'll get back to you. - don't know, i'll get back to you. i'm don't know, i'll get back to you. in putting _ don't know, i'll get back to you. i'm putting you all on the spot today. i'll come back to you with the answer. it certainly one that will watch. justin, whatever people, whichever side you stand on on the conflict in the middle east. men and women going bravely into harms way

and doing everything to protect israel and what they believe in, do you think there is the same respect, i know you want to talk about this, is there the same respect in our country for the military? lt’s is there the same respect in our country for the military?- country for the military? it's a very emboldened _ country for the military? it's a very emboldened time - country for the military? it's a very emboldened time to - country for the military? it's a very emboldened time to talk| country for the military? it's a very emboldened time to talk about this for— very emboldened time to talk about this for a _ very emboldened time to talk about this fora number— very emboldened time to talk about this fora number of— very emboldened time to talk about this for a number of reason, - very emboldened time to talk about this for a number of reason, first i this for a number of reason, first of all— this for a number of reason, first of all when — this for a number of reason, first of all when we _ this for a number of reason, first of all when we make _ this for a number of reason, first of all when we make particular . of all when we make particular acts of all when we make particular acts of remembrance, _ of all when we make particular acts of remembrance, but— of all when we make particular acts of remembrance, but we _ of all when we make particular acts of remembrance, but we spend - of all when we make particular acts of remembrance, but we spend a l of all when we make particular acts. of remembrance, but we spend a lot of remembrance, but we spend a lot of time _ of remembrance, but we spend a lot of time and — of remembrance, but we spend a lot of time and you _ of remembrance, but we spend a lot of time and you and _ of remembrance, but we spend a lot of time and you and i— of remembrance, but we spend a lot of time and you and i have _ of remembrance, but we spend a lot of time and you and i have talked i of remembrance, but we spend a lot of time and you and i have talked on air and _ of time and you and i have talked on air and off— of time and you and i have talked on air and off arrow _ of time and you and i have talked on air and off arrow a _ of time and you and i have talked on air and off arrow a lot _ of time and you and i have talked on air and off arrow a lot about - of time and you and i have talked on air and off arrow a lot about the - air and off arrow a lot about the state _ air and off arrow a lot about the state of — air and off arrow a lot about the state of the _ air and off arrow a lot about the state of the world _ air and off arrow a lot about the state of the world and - state of the world and concerns about _ state of the world and concerns about the — state of the world and concerns about the evolution _ state of the world and concerns about the evolution of - state of the world and concerns about the evolution of global. about the evolution of global threats — about the evolution of global threats and _ about the evolution of global threats and the _ about the evolution of global threats and the risks, - about the evolution of global- threats and the risks, sentiment between — threats and the risks, sentiment between nations, _ threats and the risks, sentiment between nations, we _ threats and the risks, sentiment between nations, we don't- threats and the risks, sentiment between nations, we don't yet. threats and the risks, sentiment - between nations, we don't yet know how far— between nations, we don't yet know how far that— between nations, we don't yet know how far that will— between nations, we don't yet know how far that will go _ between nations, we don't yet know how far that will go and _ between nations, we don't yet know how far that will go and of— between nations, we don't yet know how far that will go and of course i how far that will go and of course the 20 _ how far that will go and of course the 20 years— how far that will go and of course the 20 years we've _ how far that will go and of course the 20 years we've had _ how far that will go and of course the 20 years we've had as - how far that will go and of course the 20 years we've had as well of war and _ the 20 years we've had as well of war and iraq _ the 20 years we've had as well of war and iraq and _ the 20 years we've had as well of war and iraq and afghanistan, . war and iraq and afghanistan, obviously— war and iraq and afghanistan, obviously there _ war and iraq and afghanistan, obviously there was _ war and iraq and afghanistan, obviously there was a - war and iraq and afghanistan, obviously there was a lot - war and iraq and afghanistan, obviously there was a lot then war and iraq and afghanistan, - obviously there was a lot then but it now— obviously there was a lot then but it now greatly— obviously there was a lot then but it now greatly feels _ obviously there was a lot then but it now greatly feels like _ obviously there was a lot then but it now greatly feels like the - it now greatly feels like the military— it now greatly feels like the military is _ it now greatly feels like the military is the _ it now greatly feels like the military is the back - it now greatly feels like the military is the back of - it now greatly feels like the - military is the back of the pecking order— military is the back of the pecking order a _ military is the back of the pecking order a little _ military is the back of the pecking order a little bit, _ military is the back of the pecking order a little bit, and _ military is the back of the pecking order a little bit, and a _ military is the back of the pecking order a little bit, and a lot - military is the back of the pecking order a little bit, and a lot of- order a little bit, and a lot of people — order a little bit, and a lot of people think _ order a little bit, and a lot of people think that _ order a little bit, and a lot of people think that the uk - order a little bit, and a lot of people think that the uk is l order a little bit, and a lot of. people think that the uk is sure

order a little bit, and a lot of- people think that the uk is sure to be investing — people think that the uk is sure to be investing in _ people think that the uk is sure to be investing in its _ people think that the uk is sure to be investing in its defence. - people think that the uk is sure to be investing in its defence. the i be investing in its defence. the prioritising _ be investing in its defence. the prioritising our— be investing in its defence. the prioritising our service - be investing in its defence. the. prioritising our service personnel and i_ prioritising our service personnel and i do — prioritising our service personnel and i do think— prioritising our service personnel and i do think that's _ prioritising our service personnel and i do think that's a _ prioritising our service personnel and i do think that's a shame, i prioritising our service personnel. and i do think that's a shame, once that i_ and i do think that's a shame, once that l will— and i do think that's a shame, once that i will give _ and i do think that's a shame, once that i will give you _ and i do think that's a shame, once that i will give you there _ and i do think that's a shame, once that i will give you there is- and i do think that's a shame, once that i will give you there is 95,000 | that i will give you there is 95,000 in uk _ that i will give you there is 95,000 in uk prisons — that i will give you there is 95,000 in uk prisons and _ that i will give you there is 95,000 in uk prisons and 75,000 - that i will give you there is 95,000 in uk prisons and 75,000 in - that i will give you there is 95,000 in uk prisons and 75,000 in the i in uk prisons and 75,000 in the british— in uk prisons and 75,000 in the british army. _ in uk prisons and 75,000 in the british army. i— in uk prisons and 75,000 in the british army, i think _ in uk prisons and 75,000 in the british army, i think that's - in uk prisons and 75,000 in the british army, i think that's a - british army, i think that's a pretty— british army, i think that's a pretty sad _ british army, i think that's a pretty sad point _ british army, i think that's a pretty sad point for- british army, i think that's a pretty sad point for the - british army, i think that's a - pretty sad point for the country. something — pretty sad point for the country. something to _ pretty sad point for the country. something to ponder— pretty sad point for the country. something to ponder on- pretty sad point for the country. - something to ponder on remembrance day which is ahead of us, it's a really good point you raise, we are out of time, leon caldwell, justin, thank you very much indeed for being with us on the programme this evening. i'm away tomorrow but someone will be sitting here, i don't quite know who it is but i hope you willjoin us for that, i will be back on monday, thank you so much for watching, good night. hello from the bbc sport centre. i'm 0llie foster. india are the first team through to the semifinals at the cricket world cup.

the hosts beat sri lanka by an enormous 302 runs in mumbai. india lost the toss and were put into bat, but with big knocks from kohli, gill and iyer, they set sri lanka 358 to win. that would have been a record chase had they suceeded, but they crumbled, losing a wicket off the very first ball. they were four down in the fourth over and were eventualy bowled out for forjust 55, the fourth—lowest total in world cup history. mohammed shami took five wickets forjust 18 runs. india storming into the last four with seven wins out of seven. a great space at the moment, players arejudging each other�*s performance. a great space at the moment, players are cherishing each other�*s performance. that is very important when you come in such a big stage. i was just playing every ball in the minute, the wicket was awesome to bat on. grateful to get this bowl today.

we've got only a few guys that have played _ we've got only a few guys that have played 140 in this group, so i think it's a _ played 140 in this group, so i think it's a rebuilding state that we are of new— it's a rebuilding state that we are of new players, still learning the trade _ of new players, still learning the trade i_ of new players, still learning the trade i would say. so the hosts are into the semis. australia are in a fairly strong position, third in the table, but they'l be without mitchell marsh for the next game against but they'll be without mitchell marsh for the next game against england on saturday. the all—rounder returning home for personal reasons. england are all but out, but they have vowed to go down fighting. whenever you play, friend, - there's always things to play for. you know, you're playing for your country. - that's a huge motivator. and, you know, it's an extreme. privilege to get that opportunity. every game means a huge amount to this group of players, _ all desperate to do well- and understand the responsibility

he that comes with the opportunities and this is no different. _ the situation we find ourselves in. we might not be able to go and win the tournament, i but we're desperate to win every game we play and do everything | we can to get that right and turn that around and get back - to where we expect to be. south africa have started a four—day victory parade after their triumph at the rugby world cup. thousands of fans lined the streets in the capital city pretoria to get a glimpse of the team and the webb ellis trophy. the springboks are the first nation to win the world cup four times. they will also take the trophy to cape town, durban and nelson mandela bay over the next three days. we as a team, we chose to dedicate this world cup to you because you, honestly, you are the reason

we are where we are today. the way that you don't give up, with how hard you work. the things that you went through to be what you are in life, your support really kept us going. wales head coach warren gatland says he understands why there's been criticism of the timing of their match against the barbarians in cardiff on saturday. it's on the same day as key domestic games involving the four welsh regions, who are providing all 23 of the players in the wales matchday squad. i understand the issues involved. i'm conscious of that. it is why i was doing everything i could to help support the regions.

0nly picking 23 players, it would have taken another seven or eight players out, or nine players out of the regions in terms of them being available for that week. jon rahm has had a change of heart and now won't take part in a new golf venture being launched by tiger woods and rory mcilroy in the new year. the masters champion says, "it would require a level of commitment i can't offer." the 24—player league will be staged indoors in florida and played partly on high—tech golf simulators. other backers include serena and venus williams, nba star steph curry and liverpool owners the fenway sports group. lots more of course on the bbc sport web for website but that's all for me for now. hello there. good evening. damage and plenty of disruption following on in the wake

of storm ciaran, which has been sweeping eastwards, affecting mainly southern areas of the uk today with record low pressure for november, coastal overtopping, very large waves. strong gusts of wind, too, particularly for the channel islands. 93 mph gusts recorded earlier on this morning atjersey airport. 78 mph gusts of wind in dover and kent. but, of course, the storm has now eased, and the centre of the low pressure associated with it will be out into the north sea as we head through tonight. but still bands of showers, longer spells of rain swirl around this low pressure. still strong, gusty winds for a time, too, for eastern scotland and north—east england. here, we will see some more showers throughout the night. elsewhere, a few showers, particularly for northern ireland, but some clear spells as well. temperatures down to between 4—8 degrees celsius. now, tomorrow will be a calmer—looking day. the low continues to spin its way further northwards and eastwards, but there's another area of low pressure that's going to be with us from the south—west on friday night into saturday. but for most of us, it's a calmer—looking day on friday. still strong, gusty winds, gusting as high as 45—50 mph

for eastern scotland, north—east england. perhaps still some more showers here falling on saturated ground could cause some more issues, perhaps as the totals start to mount up. another rash of showers, too, for northern ireland, western wales and for south—west england. elsewhere, largely dry with some sunny spells. temperatures 10—14 degrees celsius north to south. now, on friday night into saturday, we look out towards the south—west again, with another deep area of low pressure approaching. again, it's set to affect mostly southern areas of the uk, southern england and parts of south wales with heavy downpours of rain on saturday morning. pushing northwards, weakening, but some more showers following on in its wake. across northern england, northern ireland and for much of scotland away from the far north, it should be largely dry. and the winds are set to pick up towards channel coasts, but not as windy as it was earlier on today with the storm. now, as we head through saturday night, that area of low pressure again pushes out into the north sea. we develop more of a north—westerly wind, so the focus of the showers on sunday will tend to be out towards the north and the west.

and for most of us, it should feel a little drier, a little cooler and there'll be some sunshine, i think, for much of the second half of the weekend, so a calmer picture. bye— bye. tonight at 10... israel intensifies its ground war in gaza. military footage shows the ground troops advancing. israel's prime minister says they are now at the "height of the battle". an israeli air strike on a refugee camp in central gaza in the supposed safe zone reduced residential

blocks to rubble. also on the programme... wind gusts of more than 100mph as storm ciaran sweeps in across the channel and onto the south coast of england. this hotel in salcombe lost its doors and windows as sea water poured in. charged with murder and attempted murder — a woman in australia accused of poisoning her former in—laws and two others with deadly mushroom at a family lunch. and the prime minister sits down with elon musk to discuss the dangers of humanoid robots and what ai could means forjobs. the mp andy mcdonald accused of using the loaded phrase the river to the sea, telling this programme his language wasn't provocative, but a call for peace.