hello, i'm christian fraser. you're watching the context on bbc news. a court of appeals decides donald trump wil not be given presidential immunity for his role in the january 6th capitol riots, and must face a civil lawsuit. welcome back.

at the cop climate summit in dubai today, the brazilian president, lula da silva, addressed the elephant in the room. "we have a collective problem," he said, "a lack of ambition," "our current targets," he added, "don't go anywhere near far enough." the evidence suggests he is right. today, the world meteorological organisation told us, with a month to go in 2023, the average global temperature is on track to be 1.4 degrees celsius above pre—industrial levels. that is 2.5 fahrenheit. you might recall that the agreement in 2015, in paris, was to limit global warming to "well below" 2 degrees celsius and to "pursue efforts" to keep warming within the much safer limit of 1.5. few believe that that can now be achieved. and so, a lot of the focus at this cop is about finance. finance to speed up the transition to cleaner energies in the developing world, and finance to pay for the loss and damage that the biggest nations have wreaked on the weakest. the summit agreed on thursday that the fund should be set at $100 billion by 2030.

the hosts, the uae, together with germany, pledged $100 million each, the uk $76 million, the us $17.5 million. it is a token gesture from the white house and the smallest countries would say in keeping with the way this issue is dealt with by the biggest polluters. the reason it is so low, joe, is because, of course, congress cannot agree who bears responsibility for the climate change we see around the world. white house has an offering, which is way, way below what is needed when you're looking at a pop to the size of $100 billion. weill. to the size of $100 billion. well, ou to the size of $100 billion. well, you know. — to the size of $100 billion. well, you know. i _ to the size of $100 billion. well, you know, i think— to the size of $100 billion. well, you know, i think at _ to the size of $100 billion. well, you know, i think at this - to the size of $100 billion. well, you know, i think at this point, i to the size of $100 billion. well, | you know, i think at this point, it is fair— you know, i think at this point, it is fair to— you know, i think at this point, it is fair to say— you know, i think at this point, it is fair to say among the american folks— is fair to say among the american folks that — is fair to say among the american folks that most people will acknowledge climate change, most people _ acknowledge climate change, most people acknowledge the temperatures are rising. _ people acknowledge the temperatures are rising, there is too much air

pollution — are rising, there is too much air pollution i_ are rising, there is too much air pollution. i think what sets us back a little _ pollution. i think what sets us back a little bit — pollution. i think what sets us back a little bit here, though, is the more _ a little bit here, though, is the more hysterical kinds of claims, the idea is— more hysterical kinds of claims, the idea is that — more hysterical kinds of claims, the idea is that the world is only five or ten— idea is that the world is only five or ten years away from ending because — or ten years away from ending because of climate change and i think— because of climate change and i think when those things don't happen, — think when those things don't happen, americans tend to tune it out and _ happen, americans tend to tune it out and so — happen, americans tend to tune it out and so i — happen, americans tend to tune it out and so i think what we need is a more _ out and so i think what we need is a more realistic discussion about what is going _ more realistic discussion about what is going to _ more realistic discussion about what is going to happen and what we can do about— is going to happen and what we can do about it. — is going to happen and what we can do about it, and then i think we will get — do about it, and then i think we will get to— do about it, and then i think we will get to taxpayer funding and congressional funding that is realistic _ congressional funding that is realistic. as i think we just have to turn— realistic. as i think we just have to turn it — realistic. as i think we just have to turn it down, i understand the argument — to turn it down, i understand the argument that people only take things— argument that people only take things seriously if you kind of scare — things seriously if you kind of scare them, it is frankly howl govern— scare them, it is frankly howl govern my— scare them, it is frankly howl govern my children, but i think people — govern my children, but i think people need a more realistic debate and then— people need a more realistic debate and then they will take it seriously. and then they will take it seriously-— and then they will take it seriously. well, it is really interesting, _ seriously. well, it is really interesting, i— seriously. well, it is really interesting, i hear - seriously. well, it is really interesting, i hear what i seriously. well, it is really. interesting, i hear what you seriously. well, it is really - interesting, i hear what you are saying about it does give a perspective into what a lot of people in republican circles think, joe, but are you not scared by what you are seeing, the flooding in kentucky, the wildfires in california, the heat dome that sits over texas, the hurricane strengths we have seen in florida? does that

not, to you, suggest climate change is here, it is real? . it not, to you, suggest climate change is here, it is real?— is here, it is real? , it sure doesn't — is here, it is real? , it sure doesn't think— is here, it is real? , it sure doesn't think most - is here, it is real? , it sure doesn't think most people | is here, it is real? , it sure - doesn't think most people would agree _ doesn't think most people would agree with that. the question is, what _ agree with that. the question is, what to— agree with that. the question is, what to do— agree with that. the question is, what to do about it and how many americahs— what to do about it and how many americans are willing to go out of pocket? _ americans are willing to go out of pocket? i— americans are willing to go out of pocket? i can tell you, electric vehicles — pocket? i can tell you, electric vehicles are not popular here and so people _ vehicles are not popular here and so people are _ vehicles are not popular here and so people are not thrilled with the idea that — people are not thrilled with the idea that at some point they are going _ idea that at some point they are going to — idea that at some point they are going to have to give up their gas combustion cars, sol going to have to give up their gas combustion cars, so i think again if you explain— combustion cars, so i think again if you explain to people that there are reasonable things they can do to impact _ reasonable things they can do to impact and stop these unpleasant developments, then i think they will do it, _ developments, then i think they will do it. ttut— developments, then i think they will do it. but i_ developments, then i think they will do it, but i think if you try to scare — do it, but i think if you try to scare them, then people kind of tune it out, _ scare them, then people kind of tune it out, so— scare them, then people kind of tune it out, so you — scare them, then people kind of tune it out, so you just have to be realistic _ it out, so you just have to be realistic with folks and be honest with them. job realistic with folks and be honest with them. , w ., ~ , realistic with folks and be honest with them. g .,, ., ~ , ., realistic with folks and be honest with them-— realistic with folks and be honest with them. , .,, . ~ , ., ., , with them. job makes a really good oint, with them. job makes a really good point. annabel. _ with them. job makes a really good point, annabel, there _ with them. job makes a really good point, annabel, there are _ with them. job makes a really good point, annabel, there are only - with them. job makes a really good point, annabel, there are only so i point, annabel, there are only so many times you can say, the end is near, apocalypse now, due scare people so much that eventually they just turn off. do you think that the british public is in a different place, as serious as the issue is, and as dangerous as the temperature rises are, do you think the british

public is similar in the way it use this issue?— this issue? certainly conley the british public _ this issue? certainly conley the british public has _ this issue? certainly conley the british public has proven - this issue? certainly conley the british public has proven itselfl british public has proven itself very sympathetic towards climate fanatical groups or at least that is how i would view them like extinction rebellion and just stop lawal, people have really been very patient with some of the stance that these sorts of organisations have been pulling. ——just these sorts of organisations have been pulling. —— just stop oil. you're right, there has been too much of a narrative that the apocalypse is just around the corner and yet it never seems to arrive. at cop26 restaurant is that we are at one minutes to midnight, so i don't know how me seconds we have left on the clock. today king charles said the clock. today king charles said the time is running out to tackle climate change. i suspect that many members of the population here in britain are fully aware that we need to decarbonise and slightly nervous about the costs of net zero, about which the politicians have not been wholly honest, at least not until recently and perhaps some are wondering whether we need to be

looking at adaptation at the same time as mitigation and wondering whether 70,000 delegates descending on dubai is really the best way of tackling climate change, many of them arriving byjet. qm. tackling climate change, many of them arriving byjet.— them arriving by 'et. 0k, well, there is always _ them arriving by jet. 0k, well, there is always that _ them arriving by jet. 0k, well, there is always that issue, - them arriving by jet. 0k, well, | there is always that issue, yes. right, we will leave that there, people will have their thoughts about it, it scares people more than others and some would say we need to take it much more seriously than currently is being taken by several governments around the world, but let's on. —— let's move on. there is a lot going on in trump world right now, in relation to his many legal problems. yesterday, an ny appeals court reinstated the gag order that prevents donald trump and his team from criticising the court personnel in his ongoing civil fraud trial in new york. today in washington, a separate appeals court ruled that he can be sued in civil lawsuits relating to the january 6th capitol riot. he has no presidential immunity. that decision will have significant implications for lawsuits brought by capitol police officers and democrats in congress. seperate to all that, in georgia,

where the former president is charged with multiple counts of racketeering, a pre—trial hearing got underway in which mr trump's lawyers were fighting to have it thrown out. that is just one day, one snapshot of a day in the life of donald trump, joe, and that for many people is the problem. i hate to think what his legal bills must be like. i can his legal bills must be like. i can onl , i his legal bills must be like. i can only. i mean. — his legal bills must be like. i can only, i mean, when _ his legal bills must be like. i can only, i mean, when i— his legal bills must be like. i can only, i mean, when i was- his legal bills must be like. i can only, i mean, when i was on - his legal bills must be like. i can only, i mean, when i was on the| his legal bills must be like. i can only, i mean, when i was on the lost law firm _ only, i mean, when i was on the lost law firm side — only, i mean, when i was on the lost law firm side i— only, i mean, when i was on the lost law firm side i would have salivated, right, all his dollars. yes, _ salivated, right, all his dollars. yes. took. _ salivated, right, all his dollars. yes. took. i_ salivated, right, all his dollars. yes, look, ithink salivated, right, all his dollars. yes, look, i think donald trump is in a tough — yes, look, i think donald trump is in a tough spot. i do think that his opponents — in a tough spot. i do think that his opponents have to be a little careful— opponents have to be a little careful of the idea of sort of piling — careful of the idea of sort of piling on— careful of the idea of sort of piling on because in my assessment, some _ piling on because in my assessment, some of— piling on because in my assessment, some of these cases are stronger than _ some of these cases are stronger than others. as far as the immunity, that is— than others. as far as the immunity, that is not— than others. as far as the immunity, that is not surprising. i mean, a president — that is not surprising. i mean, a president receives immunity for officiat— president receives immunity for official acts so he or she cannot be sued _ official acts so he or she cannot be sued for— official acts so he or she cannot be sued for whatever decision they make officially— sued for whatever decision they make officially during the course of

their— officially during the course of their duty. president trump's post 2020 _ their duty. president trump's post 2020 election activities were purely poiiticai~ _ 2020 election activities were purely political. all of his rantings about whether— political. all of his rantings about whether the fact that he actually won the — whether the fact that he actually won the election and that the congressional certification should not take — congressional certification should not take place, those were not official, — not take place, those were not official, so— not take place, those were not official, so really i am not surprised by this ruling one bit. you don't — surprised by this ruling one bit. you don't think, then, the appeal court decision in washington will open the floodgates to plenty more people coming forward to sue him for what went on onjanuary six? trio. people coming forward to sue him for what went on onjanuary six? tie. it what went on on january six? no, it robabl what went on on january six? no, it probably will. _ what went on on january six? no, it probably will, and _ what went on on january six? no, it probably will, and so _ what went on on january six? no, it probably will, and so i _ what went on on january six? no, it probably will, and so i imagine - probably will, and so i imagine those — probably will, and so i imagine those legal bills willjust mount. i think— those legal bills willjust mount. i think trump's real concerns are the four criminal— think trump's real concerns are the four criminal cases that he is facing. — four criminal cases that he is facing. so _ four criminal cases that he is facing, so i think staying out of all facing, so i think staying out of jail is _ facing, so i think staying out of jail is probably his top priority, but sure. — jail is probably his top priority, but sure. i_ jail is probably his top priority, but sure, i mean, he is looking at a really. _ but sure, i mean, he is looking at a really. really — but sure, i mean, he is looking at a really, really rough year in terms of legal— really, really rough year in terms of legal actions next year. just se arate of legal actions next year. just separate to — of legal actions next year. just separate to what _ of legal actions next year. just separate to what is _ of legal actions next year. jut separate to what is going on with his legal problems, annabel, the comments from jamie diamond, ceo of jp morgan, really struck me this week. he is obviously supporting nikki haley, who is running against

donald trump, and he has called on liberal democrats in open primaries around the country to come out in support of her to see off donald trump. now, people don't follow the primary season, they are about half, i think that is right, about half the states have open primaries around the country, joe? in other states you have to be a party ticket holder in order to vote, but can you see a scenario, annabel, were actually some momentum could start to build around nikki haley's campaign, may be driven by the other side? ~ ., , , campaign, may be driven by the other side? ., , campaign, may be driven by the other side? ., ~ side? well, anything is possible. a ear is a side? well, anything is possible. a year is a very _ side? well, anything is possible. a year is a very long _ side? well, anything is possible. a year is a very long time _ side? well, anything is possible. a year is a very long time in - year is a very long time in politics, christian, but itjust seems like donald trump has pulled so far away in the republican nomination race and i struggle to see how many billie any of the other candidates in what is still a pretty large pool are going to be able to catch up with him. and it seems that the larger the circus gets, the more oxygen he is able to absorb, the

more robust the support from grassroots republicans appears to be behind him, so you can understand the incentive for perhaps appealing to some liberal democrats to throw their support behind other contenders in that race because there is so little chance of breaking the hold that donald trump has over his most fierce supporters. yes. just one line from manny willis, the district attorney in fulton county said today she wants a trial. they are in pre—trial motions at the moment, she said she wants a trial in august 2024, which of course would be two or three months before the vote in november, so there will be plenty going on right up there will be plenty going on right up until the vote. around the world and across the uk, this is bbc news. bbc news, bringing you different stories from across the uk. that stories from across the uk. git national star college in cheltenham, students living with conditions that

affect their speech often use aac, augmentative and alternative communication devices, to help them talk. 21—year—old shannon was hit by a car when she was 11, affecting her ability to speak. mt; a car when she was 11, affecting her ability to speak-— ability to speak. my ipad is my voice and _ ability to speak. my ipad is my voice and without _ ability to speak. my ipad is my voice and without it _ ability to speak. my ipad is my voice and without it i - ability to speak. my ipad is my voice and without it i would . ability to speak. my ipad is my l voice and without it i would have ability to speak. my ipad is my - voice and without it i would have no independence at college. in voice and without it i would have no independence at college.— independence at college. in wales the are independence at college. in wales they are not _ independence at college. in wales they are not yet — independence at college. in wales they are not yet any _ independence at college. in wales they are not yet any voices - independence at college. in wales they are not yet any voices the - they are not yet any voices the young people with welsh accents or that can speak the welsh language. j that can speak the welsh language. i am from wales and i would like a welsh _ am from wales and i would like a welsh voice. but am from wales and i would like a welsh voice-— am from wales and i would like a welsh voice. �* ., ., ., welsh voice. but the national centre for electronic — welsh voice. but the national centre for electronic assistive _ welsh voice. but the national centre for electronic assistive technology i for electronic assistive technology at rookwood hospital in cardiff is working to improve the diversity of voices that their young aac users can access. 50 voices that their young aac users can access-— can access. so we have got eight voices and _ can access. so we have got eight voices and they _ can access. so we have got eight voices and they are _ can access. so we have got eight voices and they are broken - can access. so we have got eight voices and they are broken down| can access. so we have got eight - voices and they are broken down into north— voices and they are broken down into north and _ voices and they are broken down into north and south— voices and they are broken down into north and south wales. _ voices and they are broken down into north and south wales. young - voices and they are broken down into north and south wales. young and i voices and they are broken down intol north and south wales. young and old child, _ north and south wales. young and old child, male _ north and south wales. young and old child, male or— north and south wales. young and old child, male or female, _ north and south wales. young and old child, male or female, and _ north and south wales. young and old child, male or female, and then- north and south wales. young and old child, male or female, and then eachl child, male or female, and then each of those _ child, male or female, and then each of those eight — child, male or female, and then each of those eight voices _ child, male or female, and then each of those eight voices is _ child, male or female, and then each of those eight voices is bilingual. i of those eight voices is bilingual. for more — of those eight voices is bilingual. for more stories _ of those eight voices is bilingual. for more stories from _ of those eight voices is bilingual. for more stories from across i of those eight voices is bilingual. for more stories from across the| of those eight voices is bilingual. i for more stories from across the uk, head to the bbc news website. welcome back. i hesitate to bring

you this next story, given whatjoe has already told us about his views on electric cars, but the cybertruck is rolling off the production line at tesla. and surely a welcome distraction for the embattled owner elon musk. on thursday the first of these stainless steel pick—ups were delivered at a typically high octane event at tesla headquarters, in texas. there were videos of the electric truck resisting bullets, racing sports cars, pulling huge loads — one us magazine called it an "adolescent video game fantasy". the company has invested a lot in the cybertruck — they boast they have 2 million pre—orders, which is quite something — 15% of that would equal the annual unit sales of toyota. but it is late off the line, and there has been a 10k dollar price bump on the 2019 pre—order price, and we must see whether that proves to be a drag on demand. certainly, musk needs this to work. if only to remind people what a genius he is, which some would rightly be questioning right now.

particularly after that profanity—laced interview in new york on wednesday in which he called out the advertisers who are boycotting his other company, x, formerly known as twitter. you're gonna try to _ blackmail me with advertising, blackmail me with money? go bleep yourself. silence but... go bleep yourself - is that clear? laughter is that clear? yes, pretty clear. this is the _ is that clear? yes, pretty clear. this is the dichotomy _ is that clear? yes, pretty clear. this is the dichotomy of - is that clear? yes, pretty clear. this is the dichotomy of elon i is that clear? yes, pretty clear. i this is the dichotomy of elon musk, brilliant in some areas, spacex, tesla, the support he gave to ai, transformative and revolutionary and then this onstage in new york. what do you make of where his head is at the moment? it do you make of where his head is at the moment?— do you make of where his head is at the moment? it certainly sounds like it is all over — the moment? it certainly sounds like it is all over the _ the moment? it certainly sounds like it is all over the place. _ the moment? it certainly sounds like it is all over the place. look, - the moment? it certainly sounds like it is all over the place. look, he i it is all over the place. look, he is an innovator, an entrepreneur, he is an innovator, an entrepreneur, he is an innovator, an entrepreneur, he is a maverick, he is not out there to make friends, he is there to try to make friends, he is there to try to transform the world in which we live and a couple of months ago we

had an ai summit here in the uk and there wasa had an ai summit here in the uk and there was a rather strange scene of our prime minister, rishi sunak, interviewing elon musk and a lot of commentators here in britain were asking, should not be the other way around? which led to a debate over actually, who is the more powerful and important individual in the world in which we live today, the uk prime minister or elon the world's wealthiest man? but to the cybertruck, as a brit i don't really understand the pick—up appeal, i know they are the most popular vehicles over in the us and particularly not one that looks like this inspired by thejoint billie james bond movie, i believe, the spy who loved me,, but as you say, this is something tesla is staking its future on and really elon musk is staking his future on, given that under his leadership, you know, x, formerly known as twitter, has seen its value half and he has burned so many...

its value half and he has burned so man ~ ., , its value half and he has burned so man ,_,~ its value half and he has burned so man ...~ ., , many... well, i was looking at, this is money market _ many... well, i was looking at, this is money market intelligence i is money market intelligence company, sensortower, is money market intelligence company, sensor tower, and they reckon half of twitter�*s top 100 advertisers have stopped advertising on the site and that list of brand names that remain, which does include amazon and one delay, growing shorter by the day, so penny for the forts of twitter chief executive lynn, who is trying to turn this around. he goes on stage and pulled a stunt like that. i don't suppose you are, you are one the preorders for the cybertruck, no? ~ ., the preorders for the cybertruck, no? ~ . ., ~ no? mean, it looks cool and i think electric vehicles _ no? mean, it looks cool and i think electric vehicles are _ no? mean, it looks cool and i think electric vehicles are properly i no? mean, it looks cool and i think electric vehicles are properly our. electric vehicles are properly our future _ electric vehicles are properly our future i— electric vehicles are properly our future. i think people's problem, though. — future. i think people's problem, though. is— future. i think people's problem, though, is they are really expensive that it _ though, is they are really expensive that it requires right now large government subsidies in order to make _ government subsidies in order to make living close to being affordable and they still cost a lot of money — affordable and they still cost a lot of money. the other problem is the charging _ of money. the other problem is the charging stations, they don't have a great _ charging stations, they don't have a great history here in the us and so that makes— great history here in the us and so that makes anything other than local driving _ that makes anything other than local driving pretty stressful for people. i driving pretty stressful for people. i expect _ driving pretty stressful for people. i expect they will get those things under— i expect they will get those things under control at some point, but right— under control at some point, but right now— under control at some point, but right now it— under control at some point, but right now it is still kind of a

tough — right now it is still kind of a tough sell for a lot of people. | tough sell for a lot of people. i can subscribe to that, i am an electric owner, the range anxiety is a problem. if you don't have a tesla, if you have one of the other car that doesn't plug into the tesla range, you wouldn't take it far, although i reckon i could get about 300 miles out of mine at the moment, so that is pretty good. right, we are tight for time. now it's time for the panel. joe, let's start with you. you actually want to take on board what we have been discussing with donald trump, the love number of legal challenges within the realm of politics. challenges within the realm of olitics. ~ , ., , challenges within the realm of olitics. ~ , . , ., politics. well, christian, it is a bit broader— politics. well, christian, it is a bit broader than _ politics. well, christian, it is a bit broader than that, - politics. well, christian, it is a i bit broader than that, historically in america — bit broader than that, historically in america we have done a really good _ in america we have done a really good job— in america we have done a really good job at— in america we have done a really good job at separating law and politics. — good job at separating law and politics, and whether you think donald — politics, and whether you think donald trump is a really bad guy and deserve _ donald trump is a really bad guy and deserve to— donald trump is a really bad guy and deserve to go to jail, the fact is that all— deserve to go to jail, the fact is that all five cases against him right— that all five cases against him right now— that all five cases against him right now for criminal cases and a civil case — right now for criminal cases and a civil case are _ right now for criminal cases and a civil case are all being brought by elected _ civil case are all being brought by elected democrats. on the other side, _ elected democrats. on the other side, you — elected democrats. on the other side, you have a republican house of

representatives that has started impeachment inquiries and is trying to drag _ impeachment inquiries and is trying to drag in— impeachment inquiries and is trying to drag in the present's son to testify — to drag in the present's son to testify. now, that is not to say these — testify. now, that is not to say these are _ testify. now, that is not to say these are not righteous cases, but there _ these are not righteous cases, but there is— these are not righteous cases, but there is a — these are not righteous cases, but there is a growing feeling in america _ there is a growing feeling in america that the law is being used as a political tool. so in my opinion— as a political tool. so in my opinion i_ as a political tool. so in my opinion i would say, look, if a case is strong, — opinion i would say, look, if a case is strong, bring it, but make sure it is strong — is strong, bring it, but make sure it is strong and does not rely on very— it is strong and does not rely on very creative legal theories. and i would _ very creative legal theories. and i would predict that if one or more of these _ would predict that if one or more of these cases— would predict that if one or more of these cases against donald trump fall apart, — these cases against donald trump fall apart, as these cases against donald trump fallapart, as i these cases against donald trump fall apart, as i predict they will, people — fall apart, as i predict they will, people willjust feel like this was a political stunt and of course if it is brought by one party, it can be bought— it is brought by one party, it can be bought by the other when they are in power _ be bought by the other when they are in power. just be bought by the other when they are in ower., , w' , be bought by the other when they are in ower. , ., in power. just quickly, both of them are at it, in power. just quickly, both of them are at it. lets _ in power. just quickly, both of them are at it, let's face _ in power. just quickly, both of them are at it, let's face it, _ in power. just quickly, both of them are at it, let's face it, both - are at it, let's face it, both parties, they have issued a subpoena forjoe biden, hunter biden, joe biden's son, and they don't want it held in public, he has said, i will come and talk, but let's have it open so the public can watch it and they don't want that, which does suggest it is a political stunt. j suggest it is a political stunt. i think it is largely theatre, frankly, _ think it is largely theatre, frankly, i think it is a terrible

idea — frankly, i think it is a terrible idea and _ frankly, i think it is a terrible idea and i_ frankly, i think it is a terrible idea and i think the republicans are doing _ idea and i think the republicans are doing it. _ idea and i think the republicans are doing it, they didn't even vote properly— doing it, they didn't even vote properly to make this an impeachment inquiry, _ properly to make this an impeachment inquiry, this— properly to make this an impeachment inquiry, this is nothing more than a house _ inquiry, this is nothing more than a house oversight committee being called _ house oversight committee being called something else and i think it is theatre _ called something else and i think it is theatre in order to distract from trump's _ is theatre in order to distract from trump's legal problems, sol is theatre in order to distract from trump's legal problems, so i think both parties are equally at issue here _ both parties are equally at issue here and — both parties are equally at issue here and i— both parties are equally at issue here and i would say, look, if you are going — here and i would say, look, if you are going to— here and i would say, look, if you are going to do this against a political— are going to do this against a political opponent, please make sure you have _ political opponent, please make sure you have a _ political opponent, please make sure you have a solid case and not something that is not sensible. it something that is not sensible. comes something that is not sensible. it comes back to annabel's point comes back to annabel�*s point earlier that when people see this, thatis earlier that when people see this, that is why they are apathetic about the politicians and the people we elect. let's turn to your story, annabel, a lot of us are familiar with this amazing sphere in las vegas in which they project extraordinary images. are we going to get one here?— to get one here? well, that really de ends. to get one here? well, that really depends- so _ to get one here? well, that really depends. so there _ to get one here? well, that really depends. so there is _ to get one here? well, that really depends. so there is this - to get one here? well, that really depends. so there is this clash i to get one here? well, that really. depends. so there is this clash that is brewing between are levelling up secretary, michael gove, and sadiq khan, the mayor of london, over whether this is the venue should be built in stratford in east london. sadiq khan has blocked the plans,

but he may have his decision now overturned by michael gove, who seems to perhaps be in favour of it. now, the levelling up secretary does have a right to call in certain planning projects, but when he has wielded that in the past it has been to block, rather than to wave through developments. now, i think this really speaks to a wider problem we have in the uk when it comes to building and that is not just about housing and a high housing crisis, it is about shop fronts and spheres and economic growth, creating growth and jobs and saying yes to investment or to quote keir starmer, it is about being a builder and not a blocker. so actually, i understand there are concerns, particularly from local residents, but i think there is something the uk should press ahead with. ., , , something the uk should press ahead with. . , , , something the uk should press ahead with. .y , with. really interesting. maybe pick u . with. really interesting. maybe pick u- on that, they are talking about stratford—upon—avon, aren't they? we are out of time, annabel denham and joe moreno, lovely to have your company on the programme this evening, thank you forjoining us, we will of course be back on monday,

same time, same place, join then, goodbye! hello from the bbc sport centre. england lionesses have produced a stirring comeback to beat the netherlands in the women's nations league, but it's a victory that leaves their two destinies out of their hands. they won the game 3—2 to at least keep hopes alive of both progressing to the tournament's finals and qualifying for the olympics on behalf of team gb. england knew they needed a victory by 2 clear goals to go top of their group, but lineth beerensteyn scored twice to make it 2—0 to the dutch at half—time. england now had a mountain to climb, but georgia stanway pulled a goal back after the break. just two minutes later they had another,

this time from lauren hemp as she made it all square. it was to be a thrilling finish and ella toone made it 3—2 with a goal in injury time. but there were no more goals. if england beat scotland and the netherlands fail to beat belgium on tuesday... then those twin achievements are secured. scotland had to win in belgium tonight and beat england on tuesday to avoid relegation. but could only draw. marie detruyer put the belgians ahead before erin cuthbert scored a superb equaliser and h it finished. scotland will drop down to nations league b. wales are also heading for the nations league's second tier after a 2—1 defeat against iceland in cardiff. they needed a win to avoid being relegated with a game to spare, but iceland's second goal from substitute dilja zomers sealed wales' fifth defeat out of five group games. it all means that northern ireland provided the only home provided the earliest home

nations win of the evening. their 4—0 win in albania means they can still be promoted out of the nations league b. aston villa's simone magill got two of their goals. the fa cup has lost one of the 10 non—league teams that had made round two, with york losing 1—0 to wigan. the only goal of the game played in fog almost dense enough for it to be injeopardy right up until kick—off came from stephen humphreys. york had a couple of chances, but didn't manage to find the crucial goal. notts county were the other team looking for an upset tonight, but league two couldn't beat league one as they lost 3—2 at home to shrewsbury. striker ryan bowman came away with a hattrick. two of england's world cup winners, as well as two former wales stars, are among 295 ex—players suing the rugby authorities over brain injuries. phil vickery and mark regan were part of the victorious 2003 squad, while gavin henson and colin charvis are also listed in the legal case. charvis played 94 times for wales

and also captained them during an 11—year career. the high court heard today that an application for the cases to be heard collectively would be made next year. it would allow all the lawsuits against world rugby, the rugby football union and the welsh rugby union to be managed together. harlequins are up to second in rugby union's premiership after a comprehensive 36—3 win over leaders sale. quins ran in five tries, the pick of them this great effort by danny care just after half time. it means sale could lose top spot if saracens beat northampton tomorrow. in the united rugby championship munster beat glasgow 40—29. ronnie o'sullivan got himself out of a jam to reach the semi—finals of the uk snooker championship, winning his last eight match on a deciding frame in york. the seven time winner was 4—1 up against zhou yuelong of china, needing just two more frames to win, but lost four in a row to trail 5—4. but zhou couldn't get over the line, with o'sullivan finishing off with a century break. despite claiming afterwards he'd been "awful," the world number one

will play hossein vafai of iran in the semi—finals. i still love playing and, you know, with pool, billiards, i love all cue sports and sometimes you think it is about making the right decision at the right time, but i love the game, i love snooker, i always play snooker, but when you are out playing these young guys, they are really hungry, i have another one tomorrow, he is really up for it, it just doesn't stop. if i were playing steve, i would be feeling great, but i'm feeling the kids, i am playing these kids, they are like grandchildren to me, you know? tiger woods had a better second day at the pga tour's hero world challenge after admitting he felt 'rusty�* on thursday, having not played since april. woods made a two under par 70. at one point it looked as if it could be even better

because he was four under through the first 12 holes, but three late birdies rather ruined his card. he's one over par overall. scottie scheffler and jordan spieth share the lead on 9 under par overall. and that's all the sport for now. hello there. the big freeze is set to continue throughout the weekend ahead and well into next week as well. on friday, we did have some fresh snowfall around, but many of us had blue skies and sunshine. it was a day where temperatures didn't get above freezing all day in places. and we're going to see temperatures drop like a stone overnight. now, these showers heading into dumfries and galloway could be quite interesting, bringing up to three centimetres of snow, eventually working into cumbria. and we'll also have some snow showers for northern and eastern scotland, eastern england that could bring an odd centimetre or two. ice the main hazard, a really cold night. lowest temperatures probably getting down to about —10. on to saturday's forecast, any mist patches tending to clear away. a lot of dry weather with sunshine. showers this time focused across western areas. these are likely to come in as rain or sleet through the day on saturday. temperatures really struggling. there'll be some places that stay

well below freezing once again. now, saturday night could bring some areas of localised disruption across england and wales. clumps of showers are going to start to push eastwards. now, some of them could well fall as snow, but i think mixed in with this, we may well have a spell of freezing rain, really dangerous stuff, this. it's liquid rain that's got a temperature below zero and it turns to ice on any surface it touch. surface it touches. so we could well see roads and pavements turn to ice rinks across parts of england and wales from this feature. further northwards, we've got clearer skies, drier weather. and another bitterly cold night, with temperatures again plunging, plumbing the depths and probably getting down to about —10, again, in the coldest areas. sunday, any wintriness will clear away from eastern areas. in the south, we'll be threatened with bits and pieces of rain, maybe a bit of sleet or hail, snow on the northern edge of this. away from that, though, we've got a few mist patches. otherwise, it's dry with sunshine. it stays very cold, and it could be another day where temperatures stay below freezing.

or in other words, there will be some of you that have temperatures throughout the whole of the weekend below freezing. on monday, an area of low pressure is forecast to move to the south of the uk. now, this could well have some snow on its northern edge, but the exact amount of snow that we'll get in places depends entirely on the track of that area of low pressure and there's a bit of uncertainty. but away from that, a lot of sunshine, some showers affecting eastern coasts. and for most, it stays really cold again. bye for now.

tonight at ten... fighting resumes in gaza as the ceasefire between israel and hamas comes to an end. a child says goodbye to his father — one of dozens of people killed in israeli strikes. rishi sunak tells the dubai climate summit that the uk is a leader in tackling climate change. expelled — the us congressman accused of fraud, lying and stealing. george santos is kicked out by the house of representatives.