and i will not stop now. it's clear to me that a majority of republican primary voters want to give donald trump another chance. nikki haley, nikki haley, nikki haley... do you know they destroyed all the information, all the evidence, everything, they deleted and destroyed all of it. when you're 80, that's - what happens, you're just not as sharp as you used to be. this is not personal. you all know i voted for him twice. the first in the nation primary in new hampshire. our panel tonight ron christie, former senior advisor to president george w. bush and tim allan, former downing street press secretary under tony blair. also sumi somaskanda. first though, the latest bbc news. a us media outlet is reporting israel has given hamas a proposal via mediators that includes an up

to two month pause in fighting. axios news says the multi—phase deal would include the release of all remaining hostages held in gaza. its report cites two unnamed israeli officials. injerusalem, family members of some of the hostages still being held broke through security at the knesset to disrupt a finance meeting. the house of lords has dealt a blow to rishi sunak�*s plan to send some illegal migrants to rwanda. the move was backed by 43 votes to deliver treat with the african nation which paves the way for the scheme to go ahead. legislation was passed in the commons last week, despite threats from some conservative mps to oppose it. two people have died in the high winds brought by storm isha. an 84—year—old man was killed when a car in which he was a passenger was hit by a fallen tree in grangemouth. police in northern ireland say a man in his 60s died in similar circumstances in limavady. the us military says two navy seals

who went missing during a special forces operation to seize iranian weapons from houthi rebels in yemen have been declared dead. they were boarding a vessel when one fell into the water in eight—foot swells and the otherjumped in after him. but we start tonight in new hampshire. just under eight hours until polls open for the republican primary, in what is now officially a head—to—head. here's the weekend polling, which suggests donald trump has stretched his lead over nikki haley to 19 points in the suffolk university poll. ron desantis of course pulling out last night. it's a little bit tighter in the cnn poll, but a seven point gap that we were looking at in this poll last week, is now 11. let's go straight to concorde, new hampshire where our colleague sumi somaskanda has been watching final campaiging. and it really feels like do or die for nikki haley?

it absolutely does, kris jenner. that is the message we have seen from many of his supporters who we met on the campaign trail. she has been holding several events across the state. her campaign says that she has actually planned more than 30 events in just she has actually planned more than 30 events injust this past she has actually planned more than 30 events in just this past week ahead of the primary that is held tomorrow. this is the state where nikki haley has to make a big splash after donald trump had that mammoth victory in iowa. it is interesting that you mention a few polls there, christian. there was a washington poll that said that 52% of potential primary voter support donald trump with 34% backing nikki haley. you can see that why her campaign is really barnstorming for this past week and through today as well. she is holding several events today. another big rally in just a few hours. donald trump will also be holding another rally tonight. a lot is on the line here for nikki haley. she needs to perform well here in order to then move on to south

carolina after this. and have any chance of to korean republican nomination. what is really interesting is the feeling we are getting here from voters we are speaking to is a feeling of inevitability that donald trump will be the nominee, and in fact i asked the question to converters and supporters of nikki haley, that if donald trump is on the ticket after all this is said and done would you vote for him? and was either no are definitely not. vote for him? and was either no are definitely not-— definitely not. that enthusiasm gap is something _ definitely not. that enthusiasm gap is something we _ definitely not. that enthusiasm gap is something we need _ definitely not. that enthusiasm gap is something we need to _ definitely not. that enthusiasm gap is something we need to look - definitely not. that enthusiasm gap is something we need to look at. i is something we need to look at. let's have a quick look at the number of registered voters in new hampshire and how that splits down. around 40% of them are declared independence. so if nikki haley wants to do well tomorrow night, then she needs to probably win an overwhelming share of that independent ballot and a decent slice of the base. it seems to be that she is struggling with the base. that is where her problem lies. ., , base. that is where her problem lies. . , ., , , ., lies. that is absolutely right. that

is what we — lies. that is absolutely right. that is what we heard _ lies. that is absolutely right. that is what we heard from _ lies. that is absolutely right. that is what we heard from analysts i lies. that is absolutely right. that | is what we heard from analysts say on the ground in new hampshire as well. nikki haley is not performing well. nikki haley is not performing well amongst registered republicans in the state. the place where she can gain a lot is amongst those independent voters. new hampshire is famous for this independent streak. we should say that it is somewhere where independent voters have handed candidates in the past some big surprises. you will remember bill clinton in 1992 alsojohn mccain in 2000. there used new hampshire to kick—start campaigns and then secure with respected nominations. that is what nikki haley is hoping to do here. if you look at those polls, what she needs is for a large amount of those independent voters to turn out. that is why she has been on the road so much. before the new hampshire primary in the weeks leading up to this and of course in the past week as well. it is something that is going to be make or breakfor something that is going to be make or break for her. some of the analysts that we have spoken to say there is still very little chance, but if she gets those independent voters to turn out in mass she could possibly cut it to a single digit

lead. very unlikely however that she could best donald trump ear. i5 lead. very unlikely however that she could best donald trump ear. is it a little bit warmer _ could best donald trump ear. is it a little bit warmer there _ could best donald trump ear. is it a little bit warmer there in _ could best donald trump ear. is it a little bit warmer there in new - little bit warmer there in new hampshire when it was in iowa? i think compared to iowa you could consider this ball me. it is not nearly as cold as it was in iowa. we had some very cold days and we were out at a lobster shack with nikki haley yesterday and the entire lake was completely frozen over. we have dealt with some cold weather here as well. indie dealt with some cold weather here as well. ~ ., dealt with some cold weather here as well. ~ . ., h, ., ., well. we have never had it so good, ron. i did well. we have never had it so good, ron- i did not— well. we have never had it so good, ron. i did not think _ well. we have never had it so good, ron. i did not think that _ well. we have never had it so good, ron. | did not thinkthat 33c- ron. i did not think that bbc expenses went to the lobster shack, but maybe they do. i was looking at a poll last that regardless of who you support in this race, who do you think will win the election? 84% think will win the election? 84% think it is trump. i don't think nikki haley has done enough in this campaign to disavow them of that belief, do you? ida. campaign to disavow them of that belief. do you?— belief, do you? no, i don't. good evenina. belief, do you? no, i don't. good evening- happy— belief, do you? no, i don't. good evening. happy new— belief, do you? no, i don't. good evening. happy new year, - belief, do you? no, i don't. good evening. happy new year, my i belief, do you? no, i don't. good- evening. happy new year, my friend, liy evening. happy new year, my friend, by the _ evening. happy new year, my friend, by the way _ evening. happy new year, my friend, by the way. this is going to be a very— by the way. this is going to be a very interesting contest that we see tomorrow — very interesting contest that we see

tomorrow. you look back to 2000, governor_ tomorrow. you look back to 2000, governor george w bush lost new hampshire and that turned south carolina — hampshire and that turned south carolina into his make or break. so many— carolina into his make or break. so many republicans are saying it is the sense — many republicans are saying it is the sense of nape ability that donald — the sense of nape ability that donald trump is going to win. i believe — donald trump is going to win. i believe that if nikki haley can get that 40% — believe that if nikki haley can get that 40% independent or unaffiliated voters _ that 40% independent or unaffiliated voters to _ that 40% independent or unaffiliated voters to change their registration to vote _ voters to change their registration to vote for— voters to change their registration to vote for republicans, a republican candidate other than trump, — republican candidate other than trump, that can give her a republican candidate other than trump, that can give hera bounce ahead _ trump, that can give hera bounce ahead of— trump, that can give hera bounce ahead of south carolina. i have been in politics _ ahead of south carolina. i have been in politics for too long to say that it is over~ — in politics for too long to say that it is over~ it— in politics for too long to say that it is over. it is not over until the last— it is over. it is not over until the last ballot— it is over. it is not over until the last ballot is _ it is over. it is not over until the last ballot is counted. tim it is over. it is not over until the last ballot is counted.— last ballot is counted. tim allen has been involved _ last ballot is counted. tim allen has been involved in _ last ballot is counted. tim allen has been involved in one - last ballot is counted. tim allen has been involved in one or- last ballot is counted. tim allen has been involved in one or two| has been involved in one or two campaigns and he may well be involved in one just around the corner here in the uk. i don't know, tim, neighbouryou corner here in the uk. i don't know, tim, neighbour you will tell us. that change message that she was offering in her concession speech in iowa saying that you do not want these two, 70% of americans say they don't want that race again, would you put that motor the fall of the campaign and perhaps she has? weill.

campaign and perhaps she has? well, i think it campaign and perhaps she has? well, i think it has — campaign and perhaps she has? well, i think it has to _ campaign and perhaps she has? well, i think it has to be _ campaign and perhaps she has? well, i think it has to be the _ campaign and perhaps she has? well, i think it has to be the message if you are _ i think it has to be the message if you are going _ i think it has to be the message if you are going to _ i think it has to be the message if you are going to be _ i think it has to be the message if you are going to be running - i think it has to be the message if you are going to be running a - i think it has to be the message if. you are going to be running a hedge against _ you are going to be running a hedge against the — you are going to be running a hedge against the established _ you are going to be running a hedge against the established canada. - you are going to be running a hedge against the established canada. a l against the established canada. a message — against the established canada. a message of— against the established canada. a message of change _ against the established canada. a message of change is _ against the established canada. a message of change is likely - against the established canada. a message of change is likely to - against the established canada. a message of change is likely to be| message of change is likely to be the one _ message of change is likely to be the one to — message of change is likely to be the one to go _ message of change is likely to be the one to go for. _ message of change is likely to be the one to go for.— the one to go for. that is an interesting _ the one to go for. that is an interesting point. _ the one to go for. that is an interesting point. do - the one to go for. that is an interesting point. do you i the one to go for. that is an i interesting point. do you think the one to go for. that is an - interesting point. do you think she is running against an incumbent in actualfact, because it has never happened in 100 years this? it actual fact, because it has never happened in 100 years this? it feels that all of the _ happened in 100 years this? it feels that all of the polls _ happened in 100 years this? it feels that all of the polls and _ happened in 100 years this? it feels that all of the polls and all - happened in 100 years this? it feels that all of the polls and all of - happened in 100 years this? it feels that all of the polls and all of the i that all of the polls and all of the betting _ that all of the polls and all of the betting seems— that all of the polls and all of the betting seems to _ that all of the polls and all of the betting seems to be _ that all of the polls and all of the betting seems to be saying - that all of the polls and all of the betting seems to be saying that. that all of the polls and all of the . betting seems to be saying that the nomination— betting seems to be saying that the nomination is— betting seems to be saying that the nomination is already _ betting seems to be saying that the nomination is already sewn - betting seems to be saying that the nomination is already sewn up. - betting seems to be saying that the nomination is already sewn up. she j nomination is already sewn up. she needs— nomination is already sewn up. she needs to _ nomination is already sewn up. she needs to do — nomination is already sewn up. she needs to do something _ nomination is already sewn up. she needs to do something dramatic. . needs to do something dramatic. there _ needs to do something dramatic. there is— needs to do something dramatic. there is was— needs to do something dramatic. there is was a _ needs to do something dramatic. there is was a piece _ needs to do something dramatic. there is was a piece in— needs to do something dramatic. there is was a piece in the - needs to do something dramatic. there is was a piece in the new. needs to do something dramatic. i there is was a piece in the new york times— there is was a piece in the new york times last _ there is was a piece in the new york times last week— there is was a piece in the new york times last week which _ there is was a piece in the new york times last week which interested . there is was a piece in the new york| times last week which interested me where _ times last week which interested me where she _ times last week which interested me where she was— times last week which interested me where she was saying _ times last week which interested me where she was saying that _ times last week which interested me where she was saying that the - where she was saying that the problem — where she was saying that the problem is _ where she was saying that the problem is the _ where she was saying that the problem is the republican - where she was saying that the. problem is the republican base because — problem is the republican base because a — problem is the republican base because a lot _ problem is the republican base because a lot of _ problem is the republican base because a lot of the _ problem is the republican base because a lot of the republicanj problem is the republican base - because a lot of the republican base is motivated — because a lot of the republican base is motivated by— because a lot of the republican base is motivated by giving _ because a lot of the republican base is motivated by giving liberal- is motivated by giving liberal opinions _ is motivated by giving liberal opinions a _ is motivated by giving liberal opinions a poke _ is motivated by giving liberal opinions a poke in— is motivated by giving liberal opinions a poke in the - is motivated by giving liberal opinions a poke in the eye. l is motivated by giving liberal- opinions a poke in the eye. donald trump _ opinions a poke in the eye. donald trump does — opinions a poke in the eye. donald trump does that _ opinions a poke in the eye. donald trump does that in _ opinions a poke in the eye. donald trump does that in a _ opinions a poke in the eye. donald trump does that in a way- opinions a poke in the eye. donald trump does that in a way that - opinions a poke in the eye. donaldl trump does that in a way that nikki haley— trump does that in a way that nikki haley does — trump does that in a way that nikki haley does not _ trump does that in a way that nikki haley does not. so _ trump does that in a way that nikki haley does not. so if— trump does that in a way that nikki haley does not. so if you _ trump does that in a way that nikki haley does not. so if you really- haley does not. so if you really want _ haley does not. so if you really want to — haley does not. so if you really want to be _ haley does not. so if you really want to be a _ haley does not. so if you really want to be a republican - haley does not. so if you really want to be a republican voter. haley does not. so if you reallyl want to be a republican voter to cause _ want to be a republican voter to cause a — want to be a republican voter to cause a real— want to be a republican voter to cause a real headache _ want to be a republican voter to cause a real headache for- want to be a republican voter to i cause a real headache for election day, then—

cause a real headache for election day, then donald _ cause a real headache for election day, then donald trump— cause a real headache for election day, then donald trump is- cause a real headache for election day, then donald trump is going i cause a real headache for electionl day, then donald trump is going to annoy— day, then donald trump is going to annoy the — day, then donald trump is going to annoy the people _ day, then donald trump is going to annoy the people that _ day, then donald trump is going to annoy the people that you - day, then donald trump is going to annoy the people that you dislike l annoy the people that you dislike more _ annoy the people that you dislike more than — annoy the people that you dislike more than nikki _ annoy the people that you dislike more than nikki haley— annoy the people that you dislike more than nikki haley is- annoy the people that you dislike more than nikki haley is going i annoy the people that you dislike l more than nikki haley is going to. that is— more than nikki haley is going to. that is driving _ more than nikki haley is going to. that is driving a _ more than nikki haley is going to. that is driving a lot _ more than nikki haley is going to. that is driving a lot of _ more than nikki haley is going to. that is driving a lot of people - more than nikki haley is going to. that is driving a lot of people to l that is driving a lot of people to re-up _ that is driving a lot of people to re-up their— that is driving a lot of people to re—up their support— that is driving a lot of people to re—up their support of _ that is driving a lot of people to re—up their support of donald . that is driving a lot of people to - re—up their support of donald trump. in re—up their support of donald trump. in one _ re—up their support of donald trump. in one sense — re—up their support of donald trump. in one sense she _ re—up their support of donald trump. in one sense she has _ re—up their support of donald trump. in one sense she has got _ re—up their support of donald trump. in one sense she has got to- re—up their support of donald trump. in one sense she has got to the - in one sense she has got to the place _ in one sense she has got to the place where _ in one sense she has got to the place where she _ in one sense she has got to the place where she wanted - in one sense she has got to the place where she wanted to - in one sense she has got to the place where she wanted to be, | in one sense she has got to the - place where she wanted to be, which is a two _ place where she wanted to be, which is a two horse — place where she wanted to be, which is a two horse race, _ place where she wanted to be, which is a two horse race, all— place where she wanted to be, which is a two horse race, all of— place where she wanted to be, which is a two horse race, all of the - is a two horse race, all of the other— is a two horse race, all of the other candidates— is a two horse race, all of the other candidates have - is a two horse race, all of the other candidates have gone l is a two horse race, all of the . other candidates have gone and is a two horse race, all of the - other candidates have gone and she has tried _ other candidates have gone and she has tried to — other candidates have gone and she has tried to engineer— other candidates have gone and she has tried to engineer that. - other candidates have gone and she has tried to engineer that. on- other candidates have gone and she has tried to engineer that. on the l has tried to engineer that. on the other— has tried to engineer that. on the other hand. — has tried to engineer that. on the other hand, some _ has tried to engineer that. on the other hand, some of— has tried to engineer that. on the other hand, some of the - has tried to engineer that. on the other hand, some of the polling l other hand, some of the polling showed — other hand, some of the polling showed that— other hand, some of the polling showed that ron _ other hand, some of the polling showed that ron desantis - other hand, some of the pollingi showed that ron desantis voters other hand, some of the polling - showed that ron desantis voters seem to be breaking — showed that ron desantis voters seem to be breaking more _ showed that ron desantis voters seem to be breaking more towards _ showed that ron desantis voters seem to be breaking more towards trump i to be breaking more towards trump than hayley, — to be breaking more towards trump than hayley, so— to be breaking more towards trump than hayley, so it _ to be breaking more towards trump than hayley, so it has _ to be breaking more towards trump than hayley, so it has made - to be breaking more towards trump than hayley, so it has made the - to be breaking more towards trump| than hayley, so it has made the gap worse _ than hayley, so it has made the gap worse for— than hayley, so it has made the gap worse for her — than hayley, so it has made the gap worse for her. at _ than hayley, so it has made the gap worse for her. at the _ than hayley, so it has made the gap worse for her. at the moment - than hayley, so it has made the gap worse for her. at the moment it - worse for her. at the moment it certainly— worse for her. at the moment it certainly looks— worse for her. at the moment it certainly looks like _ worse for her. at the moment it certainly looks like a _ worse for her. at the moment it certainly looks like a very - worse for her. at the moment it certainly looks like a very uphill| certainly looks like a very uphill struggle — certainly looks like a very uphill struggle for— certainly looks like a very uphill struggle for her. _ certainly looks like a very uphill struggle for her. but _ certainly looks like a very uphill struggle for her. but primariesl certainly looks like a very uphill i struggle for her. but primaries are weird _ struggle for her. but primaries are weird things — struggle for her. but primaries are weird things and _ struggle for her. but primaries are weird things and weird _ struggle for her. but primaries are weird things and weird things - struggle for her. but primaries are weird things and weird things can. weird things and weird things can happen— weird things and weird things can happenand— weird things and weird things can happen and momentum - weird things and weird things can happen and momentum can - weird things and weird things can happen and momentum can shift| happen and momentum can shift quickly — happen and momentum can shift quickly. she _ happen and momentum can shift quickly. she is _ happen and momentum can shift quickly. she is going _ happen and momentum can shift quickly. she is going to - happen and momentum can shift quickly. she is going to need - happen and momentum can shift quickly. she is going to need to. quickly. she is going to need to happen— quickly. she is going to need to happen very— quickly. she is going to need to happen very quickly, _ quickly. she is going to need to happen very quickly, otherwise| quickly. she is going to need to. happen very quickly, otherwise it quickly. she is going to need to- happen very quickly, otherwise it is going _ happen very quickly, otherwise it is going be _ happen very quickly, otherwise it is going be a — happen very quickly, otherwise it is going be a foregone _ happen very quickly, otherwise it is going be a foregone conclusion- going be a foregone conclusion pretty— going be a foregone conclusion pretty soon _ going be a foregone conclusion pretty soon. she _ going be a foregone conclusion pretty soon-— going be a foregone conclusion pretty soon. going be a foregone conclusion re soon. ,, , ., ., , pretty soon. she has been on a blitz toda and pretty soon. she has been on a blitz today and i— pretty soon. she has been on a blitz today and i think _ pretty soon. she has been on a blitz today and i think she _ pretty soon. she has been on a blitz today and i think she has _ pretty soon. she has been on a blitz today and i think she has done - pretty soon. she has been on a blitz today and i think she has done five l today and i think she has done five campaigns. she is obviously out and about today and has been pretty pointed in her attacks in recent days. she was given a gift by the former president this week and i seem to confuse it with nancy

pelosi. let's listen to that and nikki haley's responds to it. hikki nikki haley's responds to it. nikki hale is in nikki haley's responds to it. nikki haley is in charge _ nikki haley's responds to it. nikki haley is in charge of— nikki haley's responds to it. ii haley is in charge of security, we offered her 10,000 people, soldiers, national guard, whatever they wanted, that she turned it down. they do not want to talk about that. these are very dishonest people. these are very dishonest people. these things happen because, guess what, _ these things happen because, guess what, when you are 80, that is what happens _ what, when you are 80, that is what happens. you are not as sharp as you used _ happens. you are not as sharp as you used to— happens. you are not as sharp as you used to be _ happens. you are not as sharp as you used to be. this is not personal. you _ used to be. this is not personal. you all— used to be. this is not personal. you all know— used to be. this is not personal. you all know that i voted for him twice _ you all know that i voted for him twice i— you all know that i voted for him twice i was _ you all know that i voted for him twice. i was proud to serve in his administration. this is the fact that— administration. this is the fact that we — administration. this is the fact that we have a country in disarray and a _ that we have a country in disarray and a world — that we have a country in disarray and a world on fire and we need to know— and a world on fire and we need to know that — and a world on fire and we need to know that we are not giving our kids options _ know that we are not giving our kids options of— know that we are not giving our kids options of 280—year—olds going into a presidency. just options of 280-year-olds going into a presidency-— a presidency. just looking at the governor there _ a presidency. just looking at the governor there over _ a presidency. just looking at the governor there over her - a presidency. just looking at the governor there over her right. governor there over her right shoulder who was telling a souljust a few weeks ago, sumi, that she was going to win in new hampshire and now he saying that a close second would be a respectable result. talking about fundraisers in new york next week. what does that tell you? does that say to you that they have done some internal polling that does not look pretty good? i

have done some internal polling that does not look pretty good?— does not look pretty good? i think the are does not look pretty good? i think they are just _ does not look pretty good? i think they are just looking _ does not look pretty good? i think they are just looking at _ does not look pretty good? i think they are just looking at the - does not look pretty good? i think l they are just looking at the numbers that we are looking at. if you look at the polls after iowa, it is clear that donald trump has a pretty solid lead. at least in the policy in hampshire. that is why we have seen the downgrading of expectations. the governor of new hampshire was asked about this in several of the torch as he and the us and he said that she could still win but i think that we would be very happy with a clear second. we would then also want a south carolina advocates of the game are mad. it is clear that the governor trying to put a spin on what is the reality on the ground. i will add to the clip that you played from nikki haley, dialling up the pressure a little bit or at least dialling up her attacks on the president donald trump, that is interesting to note that she has really changed that in the last week of campaigning. we saw that when she was on the stage in a location about one hourfrom here on was on the stage in a location about one hour from here on saturday night, she was questioning donald trump's mental acuity and his ties on foreign policy. calling what she

said was a bromance with vladimir putin. his love letters, she said, to kimjong—un. she putin. his love letters, she said, to kim jong—un. she also voted to his legal trouble saying that we have heard this time and again, rightly or wrongly, chaos follows him. the question is whether this is too little too late. and that is something that the nikki haley campaign might have to deal with. maybe they should have started a little bit earlier and facing the president, the former president, faison on and directly confronting him. as i said, it might be a little too late. ~ ., ., ., ., too late. we are told that donald trump wants _ too late. we are told that donald trump wants a — too late. we are told that donald trump wants a knockout - too late. we are told that donald trump wants a knockout punch . trump wants a knockout punch tomorrow and they have spent money in new hampshire in the past week. this was the attack added a put out the other day on msnbc. americans were promised _ the other day on msnbc. americans were promised to _ the other day on msnbc. americans were promised to secure _ the other day on msnbc. americans i were promised to secure retirements. nikki haley's plan ends that. social securi , nikki haley's plan ends that. social security, medicare, _ nikki haley's plan ends that. social security, medicare, how— nikki haley's plan ends that. social security, medicare, how would - nikki haley's plan ends that. social security, medicare, how would you manage _ security, medicare, how would you manage the entitlements? we security, medicare, how would you manage the entitlements?- security, medicare, how would you manage the entitlements? we set the rules have changed. _ manage the entitlements? we set the rules have changed. we _ manage the entitlements? we set the rules have changed. we have - manage the entitlements? we set the rules have changed. we have changed j rules have changed. we have changed the retirement age to reflect life expectancy. we know that 65 is too low and we need to increase that.

nikki haley's plan could cut benefits for americans. trump will never— benefits for americans. trump will never let _ benefits for americans. trump will never let that happen. i am donald trump and — never let that happen. i am donald trump and i _ never let that happen. i am donald trump and i approve _ never let that happen. i am donald trump and i approve this _ never let that happen. i am donald| trump and i approve this message. that is— trump and i approve this message. that is not— trump and i approve this message. that is not particularly— trump and i approve this message. that is not particularly good - trump and i approve this message. that is not particularly good if- that is not particularly good if when you are one of the working class voters in the republican party. there are any more these days. just on that point, how do you feel about msnbc taking the ad and not running the victory speech that donald trump gave in iowa? weill. not running the victory speech that donald trump gave in iowa? well, i have to say — donald trump gave in iowa? well, i have to say that _ donald trump gave in iowa? well, i have to say that donald _ donald trump gave in iowa? well, i have to say that donald trump - donald trump gave in iowa? well, i have to say that donald trump is i donald trump gave in iowa? well, i | have to say that donald trump is the .ift have to say that donald trump is the gift that _ have to say that donald trump is the gift that keeps on giving for broadcast television here in the united — broadcast television here in the united states. and certainly msnbc, they were _ united states. and certainly msnbc, they were going to run with that, demonise — they were going to run with that, demonise one of the republican candidates. what i find interesting about— candidates. what i find interesting about the — candidates. what i find interesting about the clip that you ran is that that is— about the clip that you ran is that that is alienating a lot of conservatives, saying that we have entire _ conservatives, saying that we have entire meant spending that is way out of— entire meant spending that is way out of hand here in the states and if donald — out of hand here in the states and if donald trump is going to not only protect— if donald trump is going to not only protect the — if donald trump is going to not only protect the promise that has been given— protect the promise that has been given but— protect the promise that has been given but how many more trillions of dollars—

given but how many more trillions of dollars is— given but how many more trillions of dollars is this going to cost, there are a _ dollars is this going to cost, there are a lot _ dollars is this going to cost, there are a lot of— dollars is this going to cost, there are a lot of conservatives saying why are — are a lot of conservatives saying why are you beating up on her when we can't _ why are you beating up on her when we can't afford this very expensive entitlement? why aren't you reining in government than seeking to expand it? ., , , in government than seeking to expand it? ., y , ., ., ~ it? really interesting. can we talk about ron desantis? _ it? really interesting. can we talk about ron desantis? he _ it? really interesting. can we talk about ron desantis? he is- it? really interesting. can we talk about ron desantis? he is out, i it? really interesting. can we talk| about ron desantis? he is out, he was pulling around 6% in new hampshire. this was his concession speech last night. tim, i will get you to comment on it. really disappointing performance in iowa and this is what he said. if there was anything i could do to produce a favourable outcome, more campaign stops, more interviews, i would do it. but i can't ask our supporters to volunteer their time and donate their resources if we don't have a clear path to victory. accordingly, i am today suspending my campaign. trump is superior to the current incumbent, joe biden. that is clear. i signed a pledge to support the republican nominee and i will honour that pledge. he has my endorsement because we can't go back to the old republican guard of yesteryear, a repackaged formed of warmed over corporatism that nikki haley represents.

he never backed down. he is back after race one. in fact he backed down when he talked about donald trump. he never really took a swing at him. . . ~ trump. he never really took a swing at him. , ., ,, ., , at him. yes, and i think voters were robabl at him. yes, and i think voters were probably left — at him. yes, and i think voters were probably left thinking _ at him. yes, and i think voters were probably left thinking if— at him. yes, and i think voters were probably left thinking if he - at him. yes, and i think voters were probably left thinking if he is - probably left thinking if he is going — probably left thinking if he is going to _ probably left thinking if he is going to be _ probably left thinking if he is going to be like _ probably left thinking if he is going to be like donald - probably left thinking if he is. going to be like donald trump without— going to be like donald trump without being _ going to be like donald trump without being donald - going to be like donald trump without being donald trump l going to be like donald trump. without being donald trump we going to be like donald trump - without being donald trump we may as well vote _ without being donald trump we may as well vote for _ without being donald trump we may as well vote for the _ without being donald trump we may as well vote for the person _ without being donald trump we may as well vote for the person who _ without being donald trump we may as well vote for the person who is - well vote for the person who is actually — well vote for the person who is actually donald _ well vote for the person who is actually donald trump. - well vote for the person who is actually donald trump. i- well vote for the person who is actually donald trump. i don'tl well vote for the person who is - actually donald trump. i don't think he had _ actually donald trump. i don't think he had enough _ actually donald trump. idon't think he had enough of— actually donald trump. i don't think he had enough of a _ actually donald trump. i don't think he had enough of a distance - actually donald trump. i don't think. he had enough of a distance between him and _ he had enough of a distance between him and a _ he had enough of a distance between him and a trump _ he had enough of a distance between him and a trump to— he had enough of a distance between him and a trump to really— he had enough of a distance between him and a trump to really carve - he had enough of a distance between him and a trump to really carve out. him and a trump to really carve out a niche _ him and a trump to really carve out a niche that— him and a trump to really carve out a niche that was _ him and a trump to really carve out a niche that was going _ him and a trump to really carve out a niche that was going to _ him and a trump to really carve out a niche that was going to be - a niche that was going to be effective _ a niche that was going to be effective i_ a niche that was going to be effective. ithink— a niche that was going to be effective. i think nikki - a niche that was going to be| effective. i think nikki haley a niche that was going to be i effective. i think nikki haley is trying — effective. i think nikki haley is trying to— effective. i think nikki haley is trying to do— effective. i think nikki haley is trying to do that _ effective. i think nikki haley is trying to do that and _ effective. i think nikki haley is trying to do that and certainlyl effective. i think nikki haley is i trying to do that and certainly on issues _ trying to do that and certainly on issues like — trying to do that and certainly on issues like foreign _ trying to do that and certainly on issues like foreign policy, - trying to do that and certainly on issues like foreign policy, she i issues like foreign policy, she seems — issues like foreign policy, she seems very— issues like foreign policy, she seems very affluent - issues like foreign policy, she seems very affluent and - issues like foreign policy, she seems very affluent and has i issues like foreign policy, shej seems very affluent and has a issues like foreign policy, she - seems very affluent and has a great track— seems very affluent and has a great track record — seems very affluent and has a great track record of— seems very affluent and has a great track record of delivery— seems very affluent and has a great track record of delivery as _ seems very affluent and has a great track record of delivery as the - track record of delivery as the ambassador— track record of delivery as the ambassador to _ track record of delivery as the ambassador to the _ track record of delivery as the ambassador to the un. - track record of delivery as the ambassadorto the un. i- track record of delivery as the ambassador to the un. i wasl track record of delivery as the - ambassador to the un. i was living in new— ambassador to the un. i was living in new york— ambassador to the un. i was living in new york at _ ambassador to the un. i was living in new york at the _ ambassador to the un. i was living in new york at the time _ ambassador to the un. i was living in new york at the time when - ambassador to the un. i was living in new york at the time when shel ambassador to the un. i was living. in new york at the time when she was there _ in new york at the time when she was there and _ in new york at the time when she was there and she — in new york at the time when she was there and she had _ in new york at the time when she was there and she had a _ in new york at the time when she was there and she had a very— in new york at the time when she was there and she had a very good - there and she had a very good reputation _ there and she had a very good reputation of _ there and she had a very good reputation of being _ there and she had a very good reputation of being very - there and she had a very good reputation of being very muchj there and she had a very good i reputation of being very much on there and she had a very good - reputation of being very much on top of her— reputation of being very much on top of her brief— reputation of being very much on top of her brief and _ reputation of being very much on top of her brief and across _ reputation of being very much on top of her brief and across the _ reputation of being very much on top of her brief and across the detail. - of her brief and across the detail. in of her brief and across the detail. in some — of her brief and across the detail. in some of— of her brief and across the detail. in some of the _ of her brief and across the detail. in some of the interventions - of her brief and across the detail. in some of the interventions shel of her brief and across the detail. i in some of the interventions she has made _ in some of the interventions she has made on _ in some of the interventions she has made on foreign _ in some of the interventions she has made on foreign policy, _ in some of the interventions she has made on foreign policy, it— in some of the interventions she has made on foreign policy, it has- in some of the interventions she has made on foreign policy, it has beenl made on foreign policy, it has been effective _ made on foreign policy, it has been effective it — made on foreign policy, it has been

effective. it is _ made on foreign policy, it has been effective. it isjust_ made on foreign policy, it has been effective. it is just that _ made on foreign policy, it has been effective. it is just that you - effective. it is just that you mentioned _ effective. it is just that you mentioned msnbc- effective. it is just that you mentioned msnbc not- effective. it is just that you i mentioned msnbc not taking effective. it is just that you - mentioned msnbc not taking the effective. it is just that you _ mentioned msnbc not taking the trump speech— mentioned msnbc not taking the trump speech and. _ mentioned msnbc not taking the trump speech and. which— mentioned msnbc not taking the trump speech and, which i— mentioned msnbc not taking the trump speech and, which i think— mentioned msnbc not taking the trump speech and, which i think is _ mentioned msnbc not taking the trump speech and, which i think is an- speech and, which i think is an indication— speech and, which i think is an indication about _ speech and, which i think is an indication about how— speech and, which i think is an indication about how there - speech and, which i think is an indication about how there is l speech and, which i think is an. indication about how there is this liberat— indication about how there is this liberal media _ indication about how there is this liberal media view _ indication about how there is this liberal media view of _ indication about how there is this liberal media view of trump - indication about how there is this liberal media view of trump that| indication about how there is this i liberal media view of trump that is so antagonistic— liberal media view of trump that is so antagonistic that _ liberal media view of trump that is so antagonistic that they— liberal media view of trump that is so antagonistic that they can't - liberal media view of trump that is| so antagonistic that they can't even broadcast _ so antagonistic that they can't even broadcast him _ so antagonistic that they can't even broadcast him. i— so antagonistic that they can't even broadcast him. i think— so antagonistic that they can't even broadcast him. i think for— so antagonistic that they can't even broadcast him. i think for a - so antagonistic that they can't even broadcast him. i think for a lot- so antagonistic that they can't even broadcast him. i think for a lot of. broadcast him. i think for a lot of republicans _ broadcast him. i think for a lot of republicans that— broadcast him. i think for a lot of republicans that is _ broadcast him. i think for a lot of republicans that is quite - republicans that is quite attractive. _ republicans that is quite attractive. to— republicans that is quite attractive. to have - republicans that is quite - attractive. to have somebody who republicans that is quite _ attractive. to have somebody who is going _ attractive. to have somebody who is going to _ attractive. to have somebody who is going to really — attractive. to have somebody who is going to really annoy _ attractive. to have somebody who is going to really annoy msnbc - attractive. to have somebody who is going to really annoy msnbc so - attractive. to have somebody who is. going to really annoy msnbc so much that they— going to really annoy msnbc so much that they can — going to really annoy msnbc so much that they can put— going to really annoy msnbc so much that they can put him _ going to really annoy msnbc so much that they can put him on _ going to really annoy msnbc so much that they can put him on the - going to really annoy msnbc so much that they can put him on the tv. - going to really annoy msnbc so much that they can put him on the tv. he l that they can put him on the tv. he is that they can put him on the tv. is fighting against the liberal media and it sort of works. tbtiiii is fighting against the liberal media and it sort of works. all that hels in media and it sort of works. all that helps in and _ media and it sort of works. all that helps in and she _ media and it sort of works. all that helps in and she does _ media and it sort of works. all that helps in and she does not - media and it sort of works. all that helps in and she does not sort - media and it sort of works. all that helps in and she does not sort of. helps in and she does not sort of have _ helps in and she does not sort of have that — helps in and she does not sort of have that. therefore, _ helps in and she does not sort of have that. therefore, i— helps in and she does not sort of have that. therefore, i think- helps in and she does not sort of| have that. therefore, i think that looks— have that. therefore, i think that looks like — have that. therefore, i think that looks like it — have that. therefore, i think that looks like it is _ have that. therefore, i think that looks like it is going _ have that. therefore, i think that looks like it is going to _ have that. therefore, i think that looks like it is going to get - have that. therefore, i think that looks like it is going to get him i looks like it is going to get him over— looks like it is going to get him over the — looks like it is going to get him overthe line. _ looks like it is going to get him overthe line. i— looks like it is going to get him over the line. i think— looks like it is going to get him over the line. i think she - looks like it is going to get him over the line. i think she is- looks like it is going to get him i over the line. i think she is doing herself— over the line. i think she is doing herself a — over the line. i think she is doing herself a lot _ over the line. i think she is doing herself a lot of _ over the line. i think she is doing herself a lot of good _ over the line. i think she is doing herself a lot of good in _ over the line. i think she is doing herself a lot of good in terms - over the line. i think she is doing herself a lot of good in terms ofi herself a lot of good in terms of being _ herself a lot of good in terms of being an — herself a lot of good in terms of being an effective _ herself a lot of good in terms of being an effective candidate. i. being an effective candidate. i don't — being an effective candidate. i don't think— being an effective candidate. i don't think that _ being an effective candidate. i don't think that ron _ being an effective candidate. i don't think that ron desantisl being an effective candidate. i. don't think that ron desantis did really— don't think that ron desantis did really break _ don't think that ron desantis did really break through _ don't think that ron desantis did really break through into - don't think that ron desantis did really break through into the - don't think that ron desantis did i really break through into the public conscious— really break through into the public conscious as — really break through into the public conscious as much _ really break through into the public conscious as much and _ really break through into the public conscious as much and did - really break through into the public conscious as much and did not - really break through into the public. conscious as much and did not seem to have _ conscious as much and did not seem to have as— conscious as much and did not seem to have as much— conscious as much and did not seem to have as much differentiation. - conscious as much and did not seem to have as much differentiation. shej to have as much differentiation. she does seem _ to have as much differentiation. she does seem to — to have as much differentiation. she does seem to have _ to have as much differentiation. she does seem to have a _ to have as much differentiation. she does seem to have a much- to have as much differentiation. she does seem to have a much more - to have as much differentiation. she i does seem to have a much more fluent delivery— does seem to have a much more fluent delivery style _ does seem to have a much more fluent delivery style and — does seem to have a much more fluent delivery style and a _ does seem to have a much more fluent delivery style and a very _ does seem to have a much more fluent delivery style and a very good - delivery style and a very good communication— delivery style and a very good communication skill— delivery style and a very good communication skill and - delivery style and a very good communication skill and has. delivery style and a very good j communication skill and has a delivery style and a very good - communication skill and has a good track— communication skill and has a good track record — communication skill and has a good track record of— communication skill and has a good track record of delivery— communication skill and has a good track record of delivery in _ communication skill and has a good track record of delivery in her-

track record of delivery in her previous— track record of delivery in her previous role. _ track record of delivery in her previous role. whether- track record of delivery in her previous role. whether she i track record of delivery in her. previous role. whether she can actually — previous role. whether she can actually get _ previous role. whether she can actually get this _ previous role. whether she can actually get this done, - previous role. whether she can actually get this done, it - previous role. whether she can actually get this done, it looksl actually get this done, it looks unlikely— actually get this done, it looks unlikely at— actually get this done, it looks unlikely at the _ actually get this done, it looks unlikely at the moment - actually get this done, it looks unlikely at the moment and i i actually get this done, it looks - unlikely at the moment and i think she has— unlikely at the moment and i think she has done — unlikely at the moment and i think she has done herself— unlikely at the moment and i think she has done herself a _ unlikely at the moment and i think she has done herself a lot- unlikely at the moment and i think she has done herself a lot of- unlikely at the moment and i think she has done herself a lot of good| she has done herself a lot of good in terms _ she has done herself a lot of good in terms of— she has done herself a lot of good in terms of her— she has done herself a lot of good in terms of her future _ she has done herself a lot of good in terms of her future career- she has done herself a lot of good in terms of her future career and i in terms of her future career and potential— in terms of her future career and potential future _ in terms of her future career and potential future bids— in terms of her future career and potential future bids if— in terms of her future career and potential future bids if this - in terms of her future career and potential future bids if this one i potential future bids if this one does _ potential future bids if this one does not — potential future bids if this one does not work _ potential future bids if this one does not work out. _ potential future bids if this one does not work out. in - potential future bids if this one does not work out.— potential future bids if this one does not work out. in respect of ron desantis.--- — marc caputo wrote a piece for the messenger last week "the inside story of how ron desantis got crushed by donald trump." and it is full of quotes from people within the campaign, in fact it is dripping with venom from people who would appear to have thrown in the towel well before he did. there was this stand out quote in this piece. "desantis was told by advisers that interactions with voters "were crucial, that he needed to seem more relatable to voters." the advice was dismissed. people don t care about that stuff, he told one republican. that is really eight. he is not a retail politician, is he? he was not one of those guys was going to go out and find some warmth with the voter, a connection with the voter that tim has just talked about trump obviously having. i

that tim has just talked about trump obviously having.— obviously having. i think tim is absolutely _ obviously having. i think tim is absolutely right. _ obviously having. i think tim is absolutely right. if— obviously having. i think tim is absolutely right. if you - obviously having. i think tim is absolutely right. if you look i obviously having. i think tim is absolutely right. if you look at | obviously having. i think tim is i absolutely right. if you look at the president— absolutely right. if you look at the president who won two terms of late, bill clinton. _ president who won two terms of late, bill clinton, george w bush, barack 0bama. _ bill clinton, george w bush, barack obama, they had the eight. they had the charisma, the connection, they wanted _ the charisma, the connection, they wanted to— the charisma, the connection, they wanted to hug everybody. try getting george _ wanted to hug everybody. try getting george bush out of a campaign event and you _ george bush out of a campaign event and you had — george bush out of a campaign event and you had to down the drag him out of there _ and you had to down the drag him out of there. same with clinton. ron desantis — of there. same with clinton. ron desantis by reputation does not like shaking _ desantis by reputation does not like shaking hands. does not like spreading the love around, so to speak _ spreading the love around, so to speak he — spreading the love around, so to speak. he thought that his record and accomplishments would speak for themselves, that i have to tell you, in iowa. _ themselves, that i have to tell you, in iowa, new hampshire, south carolina. — in iowa, new hampshire, south carolina, they want to feel you, touch _ carolina, they want to feel you, touch you. _ carolina, they want to feel you, touch you, and i feel bad for sumi, this is— touch you, and i feel bad for sumi, this is one — touch you, and i feel bad for sumi, this is one of— touch you, and i feel bad for sumi, this is one of the few cycles that i have _ this is one of the few cycles that i have not— this is one of the few cycles that i have not been in both iowa and new hampshire _ have not been in both iowa and new hampshire because no matter how old you are _ hampshire because no matter how old you are people stand in line for hours _ you are people stand in line for hours to— you are people stand in line for hours to talk to you. | you are people stand in line for hours to talk to you.— you are people stand in line for hours to talk to you. i thought you were going — hours to talk to you. i thought you were going to _ hours to talk to you. i thought you were going to say _ hours to talk to you. i thought you were going to say standing - hours to talk to you. i thought you were going to say standing in - hours to talk to you. i thought you were going to say standing in line | were going to say standing in line for hours to talk to sumi. they do,

she's that popular. let me just talk quickly about labour, since you are here. patrick mcguire ran the rule over labour operations for a potential trump administration this weekend in his let's face it, he could be at a general election day one by tomorrow night. he says that it could upset the rhythm of labour's campaign plan. an interesting fear because when you consider trump's impact worldwide, there is a risk is there not? i consider trump's impact worldwide, there is a risk is there not?- there is a risk is there not? i have not read the _ there is a risk is there not? i have not read the piece _ there is a risk is there not? i have not read the piece but _ there is a risk is there not? i have not read the piece but i _ there is a risk is there not? i have not read the piece but i think- there is a risk is there not? i have not read the piece but i think it i there is a risk is there not? i have not read the piece but i think it is| not read the piece but i think it is going _ not read the piece but i think it is going to — not read the piece but i think it is going to be — not read the piece but i think it is going to be interesting _ not read the piece but i think it is going to be interesting next - not read the piece but i think it is going to be interesting next yearl going to be interesting next year about— going to be interesting next year about how — going to be interesting next year about how the _ going to be interesting next year about how the two _ going to be interesting next year about how the two election - going to be interesting next yearl about how the two election cycles into play — about how the two election cycles into play. there _ about how the two election cycles into play. there will— about how the two election cycles into play. there will be _ about how the two election cycles into play. there will be a - about how the two election cycles into play. there will be a huge - into play. there will be a huge amount— into play. there will be a huge amount of— into play. there will be a huge amount of focus _ into play. there will be a huge amount of focus on _ into play. there will be a huge amount of focus on an - into play. there will be a huge i amount of focus on an american election— amount of focus on an american election around _ amount of focus on an american election around the _ amount of focus on an american election around the world - amount of focus on an american election around the world and i election around the world and definitely— election around the world and definitely in _ election around the world and definitely in the _ election around the world and definitely in the uk, - election around the world and definitely in the uk, but - election around the world and definitely in the uk, but for. election around the world and i definitely in the uk, but for that to coincide — definitely in the uk, but for that to coincide with _ definitely in the uk, but for that to coincide with the _ definitely in the uk, but for that to coincide with the uk - definitely in the uk, but for that to coincide with the uk generall to coincide with the uk general election— to coincide with the uk general election which— to coincide with the uk general election which looks _ to coincide with the uk general. election which looks increasingly likely. _ election which looks increasingly likely. in— election which looks increasingly likely. in the— election which looks increasingly likely, in the autumn, _ election which looks increasingly likely, in the autumn, i- election which looks increasingly likely, in the autumn, ithink- election which looks increasinglyl likely, in the autumn, i think that will be _ likely, in the autumn, i think that will be an— likely, in the autumn, i think that will be an issue. _ likely, in the autumn, i think that will be an issue. you _

likely, in the autumn, i think that will be an issue. you already - likely, in the autumn, i think that will be an issue. you already seel will be an issue. you already see some _ will be an issue. you already see some people _ will be an issue. you already see some people on _ will be an issue. you already see some people on the _ will be an issue. you already see| some people on the conservative party— some people on the conservative party coming _ some people on the conservative party coming out _ some people on the conservative party coming out very _ some people on the conservative party coming out very clearly - some people on the conservativej party coming out very clearly that they are pro—trump. _ party coming out very clearly that they are pro—trump. boris - party coming out very clearly that. they are pro—trump. borisjohnson who is— they are pro—trump. borisjohnson who is no— they are pro—trump. borisjohnson who is no longer— they are pro—trump. borisjohnson who is no longer an _ they are pro—trump. borisjohnson who is no longer an mp— they are pro—trump. borisjohnson who is no longer an mp but- they are pro—trump. boris johnson. who is no longer an mp but certainly is influential— who is no longer an mp but certainly is influential in— who is no longer an mp but certainly is influential in saying _ who is no longer an mp but certainly is influential in saying that _ who is no longer an mp but certainly is influential in saying that an - is influential in saying that an jacob — is influential in saying that an jacob rees—mogg _ is influential in saying that an jacob rees—mogg say- is influential in saying that an jacob rees—mogg say that . is influential in saying that an jacob rees—mogg say that as| is influential in saying that an - jacob rees—mogg say that as well. that will— jacob rees—mogg say that as well. that will become _ jacob rees—mogg say that as well. that will become an _ jacob rees—mogg say that as well. that will become an issue - jacob rees—mogg say that as well. that will become an issue because j that will become an issue because not everybody _ that will become an issue because not everybody in _ that will become an issue because not everybody in the _ that will become an issue because not everybody in the conservative i not everybody in the conservative party— not everybody in the conservative party feels — not everybody in the conservative party feels that _ not everybody in the conservative party feels that way _ not everybody in the conservative party feels that way and - not everybody in the conservative party feels that way and they- not everybody in the conservative party feels that way and they will| party feels that way and they will end up— party feels that way and they will end up saying _ party feels that way and they will end up saying that— party feels that way and they will end up saying that they - party feels that way and they will end up saying that they will - party feels that way and they will end up saying that they will have| end up saying that they will have different — end up saying that they will have different people _ end up saying that they will have different people say— end up saying that they will have different people say different - different people say different things— different people say different things about _ different people say different things about that. _ different people say different things about that. that - different people say different things about that. that is - different people say different things about that. that is the different people say different - things about that. that is the issue they are _ things about that. that is the issue they are going _ things about that. that is the issue they are going to _ things about that. that is the issue they are going to have _ things about that. that is the issue they are going to have to _ things about that. that is the issue they are going to have to manage i they are going to have to manage about— they are going to have to manage about whether— they are going to have to manage about whether there _ they are going to have to manage about whether there are - they are going to have to manage i about whether there are pro—trump are not— about whether there are pro—trump are not as _ about whether there are pro—trump are not as a — about whether there are pro—trump are not as a party _ about whether there are pro—trump are not as a party. they _ about whether there are pro—trump are not as a party. they are - about whether there are pro—trump are not as a party. they are going i are not as a party. they are going to have _ are not as a party. they are going to have different _ are not as a party. they are going to have different views _ are not as a party. they are going to have different views on - are not as a party. they are going to have different views on that. i are not as a party. they are going i to have different views on that. for labour. _ to have different views on that. for labour. it— to have different views on that. for labour. it is— to have different views on that. for labour, it is going _ to have different views on that. for labour, it is going to— to have different views on that. for labour, it is going to be _ labour, it is going to be challenging _ labour, it is going to be challenging as - labour, it is going to be challenging as well. - labour, it is going to be i challenging as well. there labour, it is going to be - challenging as well. there are plenty — challenging as well. there are plenty of _ challenging as well. there are plenty of people _ challenging as well. there are plenty of people who - challenging as well. there are plenty of people who have - challenging as well. there are i plenty of people who have active problems — plenty of people who have active problems in _ plenty of people who have active problems in the _ plenty of people who have active problems in the labour- plenty of people who have active problems in the labour party- plenty of people who have active i problems in the labour party who have _ problems in the labour party who have already _ problems in the labour party who have already on _ problems in the labour party who have already on the _ problems in the labour party who have already on the record - problems in the labour party who have already on the record set. have already on the record set things— have already on the record set things about _ have already on the record set things about trump _ have already on the record set things about trump which - have already on the record set things about trump which are i have already on the record set - things about trump which are pretty spicy _ things about trump which are pretty spicy. negligent— things about trump which are pretty spicy. negligent as— things about trump which are pretty spicy. negligent as well. _ things about trump which are pretty spicy. negligent as well. they- things about trump which are pretty spicy. negligent as well. they are i spicy. negligent as well. they are people _ spicy. negligent as well. they are people who — spicy. negligent as well. they are people who will _ spicy. negligent as well. they are people who will be _ spicy. negligent as well. they are people who will be running - spicy. negligent as well. they are people who will be running for - people who will be running for office — people who will be running for office and _ people who will be running for office and i_ people who will be running for office and i going _ people who will be running for office and i going to— people who will be running for office and i going to have - people who will be running for office and i going to have to. people who will be running for| office and i going to have to be answering _ office and i going to have to be answering questions— office and i going to have to be answering questions about - office and i going to have to be| answering questions about how office and i going to have to be - answering questions about how they are going _ answering questions about how they are going to— answering questions about how they are going to deal— answering questions about how they are going to deal with _ answering questions about how they are going to deal with trump. - answering questions about how they are going to deal with trump. therej are going to deal with trump. there is a quote. — are going to deal with trump. there is a quote. tim- _ are going to deal with trump. there is a quote, tim. but _ are going to deal with trump. there is a quote, tim. but i _ are going to deal with trump. there is a quote, tim. but i think- are going to deal with trump. there is a quote, tim. but i think there i is a quote, tim. but i think there are quotes from all side on this when it comes to donald trump, which some are going to have to take back, may have to take back may depend how the election goes. sumi, we must say

goodbye to you. we will let you return to the warmth of a thank you very much and we will catch up with you tomorrow. sumi will be here with world news america later this evening. rough focus on a different part of the election on the other side of the break. he wore a work which will be part of the election both in the united states and the uk. keir starmerweighing in today on the conservatives stoking a culture. is bbc news. let's take a quick look at some of the making news in uk today. the government has said it would not support royal mail scrapping deliveries on saturdays. there have been reports that this could be one option put forward by the regulator, ofcom, in a review about future services. royal mail said it was not sustainable to maintain a delivery network built for twenty billion letters, when only seven billion are delivered. the nhs has launched a new campaign to encourage more people in england to get their children vaccinated against measles. cases are on the rise and new figures show more than three million children under the age of sixteen have not received their jabs. areas with low uptake of the vaccine are being targetted first.

uk households are on track for cheaper energy bills in april — according to a new report by a leading forecaster. cornwall insight say the annual bill for the average household is expected to fall by around 16 percent — or three hundred pounds. energy prices have been a centralfactor in the uk's high inflation rate. you're live with bbc news. president donald trump told a rally in new hampshire on friday night that voting for him would "stop an invasion of millions of people from parts unknown. " it forms a key part of the re—election campaign, the need to "preserve the american culture and way of life." that political battle over certain kinds of cultural issues, be it abortion, sexuality, church—state issues, and so on is the "culture war". and really it is about politics. it is about the mobilisation of political resources, of people, of voters, around certain positions on cultural issues. and we have it here in the uk.

it's a theme that was picked up today by the labour leader sir keir starmer. the tories seem set on sabotaging civil society to save their own skins. they've got themselves so tangled up in culture wars of their own making that instead of working with royal national lifeboat institution — an organisation the late queen was patron of for 70 years — to find real solutions to stop the small boats, their rhetoric has helped demonise them. instead of working with the national trust so more people can learn about and celebrate the culture and our history, they've managed to demean their work in its desperation to cling onto power at all costs. lets keep it swift. if you were to

focus on the culture wars, tim, and which site has benefited most, is it's not the right? is its mad for keir starmer to weigh in on this issue? i keir starmer to weigh in on this issue? ~ . keir starmer to weigh in on this issue? ~' ., ., , .., issue? i think we have to be careful of terminology _ issue? i think we have to be careful of terminology here. _ issue? i think we have to be careful of terminology here. work - issue? i think we have to be careful of terminology here. work can - issue? i think we have to be carefull of terminology here. work can mean different _ of terminology here. work can mean different things to different people. i actually read the speech and i_ people. i actually read the speech and i thought it was very conservative, focusing on the great little platoons of social society of people _ little platoons of social society of people working in their communities. it people working in their communities. it was _ people working in their communities. it was quite... it was not really an anti-or— it was quite... it was not really an anti—or pro—work speech. the examples _ anti—or pro—work speech. the examples he used i thought was very -ood examples he used i thought was very good political rhetoric saying that the tories are against lifeboats and against _ the tories are against lifeboats and against the national trust. | the tories are against lifeboats and against the national trust. i am the tories are against lifeboats and against the national trust. against the nationaltrust. i am not sure if they — against the nationaltrust. i am not sure if they are. _ against the nationaltrust. i am not sure if they are, i _ against the nationaltrust. i am not sure if they are, i don't _ against the nationaltrust. i am not sure if they are, i don't know - against the nationaltrust. i am not sure if they are, i don't know if - sure if they are, i don't know if they have ever spoke about the rnli. it is nigel farage who talks about the birds. i it is nigel farage who talks about the birds. ~ , ., , ., the birds. i think the people who criticise the _ the birds. i think the people who criticise the national— the birds. i think the people who criticise the national trust - the birds. i think the people who criticise the national trust have l criticise the national trust have criticised — criticise the national trust have criticised them for getting too involved — criticised them for getting too involved in politics, not actually for being —

involved in politics, not actually for being the national trust. i think— for being the national trust. i think the _ for being the national trust. i think the issue he brought up is very— think the issue he brought up is very different in america where there _ very different in america where there is— very different in america where there is much more of a focus about there is much more of a focus about the impact _ there is much more of a focus about the impact that identity aryan politics— the impact that identity aryan politics have had on universities and how— politics have had on universities and how that has gone through various— and how that has gone through various different institutions in america — various different institutions in america and has led to policies that are no— america and has led to policies that are no longer universalists but are really _ are no longer universalists but are really focused on people's racial, social. _ really focused on people's racial, social, sexual, gender, sexuality identity. — social, sexual, gender, sexuality identity. the impact of that politics _ identity. the impact of that politics has been clear in america and is _ politics has been clear in america and is a _ politics has been clear in america and is a matter of big debate. i don't _ and is a matter of big debate. i don't think— and is a matter of big debate. i don't think that we quite have the same _ don't think that we quite have the same type — don't think that we quite have the same type of debate in the uk. but i thought— same type of debate in the uk. but i thought it _ same type of debate in the uk. but i thought it was a very effective political — thought it was a very effective political speech today. we will never tet political speech today. we will never get into _ political speech today. we will never get into a _ political speech today. we will never get into a little - political speech today. we will never get into a little bit - political speech today. we will never get into a little bit more political speech today. we will i never get into a little bit more of that in the programme. we are just up that in the programme. we are just up against the break, sorry not to renew in on that, ron. do stay with us, plenty more to come. just to say goodbye to our worldview is ahead of the break but our uk viewers are

staying with us. i want to talk about the storms. isha is behind us, jocelyn is on its way. live now to matt taylor, our weather presenter. have we not suffered enough? what is coming now?— coming now? another storm, incredibly _ coming now? another storm, incredibly lively _ coming now? another storm, incredibly lively winter - coming now? another storm, incredibly lively winter here i coming now? another storm, | incredibly lively winter here in coming now? another storm, - incredibly lively winter here in the uk. lots of storms over the christmas period because of high pressure across scandinavia diverting low pressure away from us. the next name storm is coming as well. this was storm isha early run which has now pushed off into scandinavia and is not as much of feature as it was in the uk. but stepping back out we have got that next one brewing. storm jocelyn. on the face of it it looks like it is a bigger storm, the face of it it looks like it is a biggerstorm, but the face of it it looks like it is a bigger storm, but it is a more mature storm. it is past its peak so it won't have the same impact as storm isha. that is the good news of it, but it still will bring some destruction. if ijust run the chart through we will show how the low pressure system centred will push to the north of scotland. we still have widespread gale set to develop

across the country. it is going to be fit two feature storm. rain across many parts of the uk which could cause flooding across parts of scotland and north and west england and north—west wales. and then the strengthening of winds which will hit widespread gale force. a met office and the warning issue in place. not to the extent that we saw with stormy shadow. that place. not to the extent that we saw with stormy shadow.— with stormy shadow. that is good news that storm _ with stormy shadow. that is good news that storm jocelyn - with stormy shadow. that is good news that storm jocelyn is - with stormy shadow. that is good news that storm jocelyn is past i with stormy shadow. that is good | news that storm jocelyn is past its peak. i have some sympathy with that. what about the storms though? are they stronger than they were is the question a lot of people are asking. the question a lot of people are askint. , . , asking. they are indeed, it is difficult to — asking. they are indeed, it is difficult to quantify. - asking. they are indeed, it is difficult to quantify. last - asking. they are indeed, it is| difficult to quantify. last year asking. they are indeed, it is - difficult to quantify. last year we had no storms at all during the entirety of autumn, winter, spring. this year a little bit of an anomaly in that we have seen a lot more. there is no real evidence to show the storms are getting stronger but with the climate warming up it does show that they have more in the way of rainfall and that is going to have a greater impact for flooding in the years ahead.— have a greater impact for flooding in the years ahead. obviously when eo - le talk in the years ahead. obviously when people talk about _ in the years ahead. obviously when people talk about this, _ in the years ahead. obviously when people talk about this, we - in the years ahead. obviously when people talk about this, we always i people talk about this, we always characterise it in the debate about

climate change. but we also have to think of other things that are going on at this moment as well. where would you... how would you explain this to people generally? this would you. .. how would you explain this to people generally?— this to people generally? this year is robabl this to people generally? this year is probably a _ this to people generally? this year is probably a little _ this to people generally? this year is probably a little bit _ this to people generally? this year is probably a little bit of— this to people generally? this year is probably a little bit of an - is probably a little bit of an anomaly in some respects in that we have bigger climate things going on. the effect that is affecting weather patterns around the world. we are stuck in a bit of a route in which we have seen low pressure systems come our way. as i said, well we have no hard and fast evidence that follows the storms will get any stronger, there is evidence that we will see more flooding in the uk. i was having a senior moment and i could not remember the el nino effect. that is what i was driving at. obviously lots of people are out today repairing and putting fences back up, shed roofs back on. how should they prepare for what is coming over the next few weeks? that is the problem- _ coming over the next few weeks? trust is the problem. the effects of storm isha has reconstructed and brought things down. weakened trees as well. there is the chance that even though

the winds would be quite a strong with storm jocelyn and we don't expect the same impact, it could still have more of an impact than it perhaps would have done if we had notjust in such a vicious storm work its way through. anything that is loose around the house or garden, make sure that is put away and of course anything that looks a little bit unsafe at the moment, ensure thatis bit unsafe at the moment, ensure that is hold—up ready for the approaching of the storm which is going to come in stages through tuesday. rain first of all and then of course we have to mention the rain because we saw so much flooding over the christmas period. the rain is focused on a different area this time. here we could see those river levels rise. the wins again are probably enough for most of us and there is further wet and windy river through the rest of the week but not quite as bad as we started. matt through the rest of the week but not quite as bad as we started.— quite as bad as we started. matt at the weather _ quite as bad as we started. matt at the weather centre. _ quite as bad as we started. matt at the weather centre. thank - quite as bad as we started. matt at the weather centre. thank you - quite as bad as we started. matt at| the weather centre. thank you very much for that. we will keep our eye on the weather. hello, i'm christian fraser.

you're watching the context on bbc news. a us news outlet is reporting israel has given hamas a proposal through qatari and egyptian mediators which includes a two—month fighting pause in gaza for the release of all hostages. welcome back. reports tonight from axios news that israel has given hamas a proposal through qatari and egyptian mediators that includes up to two months of a pause in the fighting as part of a multi—phase deal that would include the release of all remaining hostages held in gaza. the report cites two unnamed israeli officials. the bbc hasn't yet been able to verify this report. this is happening as the us, egypt and qatar have been pushing israel and hamas to join a phased diplomatic process that would start with the release of hostages, all hostages, and eventually lead

to a withdrawal of israeli forces and an end to the war in gaza.