of the scandal. it is so disappointing that he's provided — it is so disappointing that he's provided made up antidotes and leaks to discussions held in confidence. this merely confirms that i made the correct _ this merely confirms that i made the correct decision in dismissing him. second. _ correct decision in dismissing him. second. mr— correct decision in dismissing him. second, mr staunton claimed i told him if_ second, mr staunton claimed i told him if someone has to take the rap for the _ him if someone has to take the rap for the horizon sandal, that was the reason _ for the horizon sandal, that was the reason for— for the horizon sandal, that was the reason for his dismissal. that was not the _ reason for his dismissal. that was not the reason at all. i dismissed him because there were serious concerns— him because there were serious concerns about his behaviour as chair. _ concerns about his behaviour as chair, including those raised from other— chair, including those raised from other directors on the board. joining me now is our political correspondent iain watson. ian, that row between mr staunton and kemi badenoch seems to be

deepening. it and kemi badenoch seems to be deepening-— deepening. it sure is. this spat between the — deepening. it sure is. this spat between the former _ deepening. it sure is. this spat between the former chairman i deepening. it sure is. this spat i between the former chairman and deepening. it sure is. this spat - between the former chairman and the secretary of state for business seems to be continuing. you hurt her there in the house of commons effectively refuted what he said. now he's hit back again tonight, and he's standing by the comments he made. someone like him had to take the rap for the state of the post office and that he had been talking about a senior unnamed person in government that he should stall on the compensation payment. he's also saying this allegation of mixed conduct and bullying has not been raised by him by kemi badenoch. he is a released a statement saying this idea that he was coming up with

false allegations, he suggested a blatant attempts to seek revenge. effectively saying no, he is the one thing the truth. what labour mps are calling for is for all the correspondence between the chairman, as he was, and the government to be made public. we also had a readout of the telephone conversation that kemi badenoch had with henry staunton went effectively, he was removed from his post. that is not a transcript of that telephone call, but she did say she was raising these serious concerns about effectively how the post office was being run. the government issues, she calls them. so far, the government resisted providing even more orfurther government resisted providing even more or further information, but i think as far as the opposition are concerned, they are being accused by

the government of trying to play politics. some people on the labour side of the house of commons are long—standing campaigners for sub—postmasters and mistresses, some of whom were wrongfully convicted. from their point of view, they're calling for transparency so they can try to get to the bottom of who really is telling the truth in what is a pretty unseemly aspect of this long—running saga. i is a pretty unseemly aspect of this long-running saga.— long-running saga. i guess the ruestion long-running saga. i guess the question i _ long-running saga. i guess the question i might _ long-running saga. i guess the question i might be _ long-running saga. i guess the question i might be tricky - long-running saga. i guess the question i might be tricky to i long-running saga. i guess the - question i might be tricky to answer is where does it go now? kemi badenoch stood in the house of commons, said that he wasn't telling the truth. he's now said he was. what next? i the truth. he's now said he was. what next?— what next? i think it's very difficult to _ what next? i think it's very difficult to stir _ what next? i think it's very difficult to stir this - what next? i think it's very difficult to stir this one - what next? i think it's veryi difficult to stir this one way what next? i think it's very i difficult to stir this one way or another. usually, you should take what mr is say at face value, otherwise misleading would be seen as very serious —— what ministers say. pretty seriously for the former prime minister, borisjohnson, prime minister, boris johnson, didn't it?

prime minister, borisjohnson, didn't it? ithink prime minister, borisjohnson, didn't it? i think the difficulty is seeing any hard evidence. from mr staunton's point of view, he said this comment, or allege that kemi badenoch, he made a note in the post office, a system that he can't access now. i think that's why labour mps are calling for all the transcripts to be made available so people can get to the bottom of this. but kemi badenoch believes that shouldn't necessarily have to be the case because from her point of view, she says she's telling the truth and he isn't. we're in this ping—pong battle between chairman who was removed amid allegations of providing over a poor governance and a secretary of state... it's her reputation who will not really tolerate a great deal of dissent and

fights back when attacked. jain fights back when attacked. iain watson, thank _ fights back when attacked. iain watson, thank you very much. let's rejoin the panel. justine, what do you make of how the government handled all of this? i government handled all of this? i think it's hard to really know exactly — think it's hard to really know exactly what's going on, but i do think— exactly what's going on, but i do think the — exactly what's going on, but i do think the longer this spat goes on, the more _ think the longer this spat goes on, the more it— think the longer this spat goes on, the more it develops, the more damaging — the more it develops, the more damaging it is for the government. i think— damaging it is for the government. i think what— damaging it is for the government. i think what kemi badenoch had in mind was that— think what kemi badenoch had in mind was that she would fire henry staunton, he would go off and things will move _ staunton, he would go off and things will move on. but actually, what's happening — will move on. but actually, what's happening is he's really picked her up happening is he's really picked her up on _ happening is he's really picked her up on some of those accusations she's— up on some of those accusations she's nrade _ up on some of those accusations she's made against him, and they seem _ she's made against him, and they seem to _ she's made against him, and they seem to have very different versions of the _ seem to have very different versions of the truth, — seem to have very different versions of the truth, and it feels like both can't _ of the truth, and it feels like both can't be _ of the truth, and it feels like both can't be right. so, i expect we will have _ can't be right. so, i expect we will have to _ can't be right. so, i expect we will have to have — can't be right. so, i expect we will have to have some more transparency in relation _ have to have some more transparency in relation to _ have to have some more transparency in relation to what actually

happened. i think the most important thing. _ happened. i think the most important thing. the _ happened. i think the most important thing, the sub—postmasters, and getting _ thing, the sub—postmasters, and getting the right compensation, they had to— getting the right compensation, they had to wait far too long. i think it is unseemly— had to wait far too long. i think it is unseemly this tit—for—tat argument that's going on, but the way to— argument that's going on, but the way to get— argument that's going on, but the way to get through i think is if kemi — way to get through i think is if kemi badenoch has all the evidence, ithink— kemi badenoch has all the evidence, i think she _ kemi badenoch has all the evidence, i think she would be better offjust setting _ i think she would be better offjust setting out in public and allowing people _ setting out in public and allowing people tojudge for setting out in public and allowing people to judge for themselves. let's _ people to judge for themselves. let's see — people to judge for themselves. let's see whether that information is released either from let's see whether that information is released eitherfrom kemi badenoch or from is released eitherfrom kemi badenoch orfrom henry is released eitherfrom kemi badenoch or from henry staunton. is released eitherfrom kemi badenoch orfrom henry staunton. i course, the real issue we mustn't forget is the plight of all the sub—postmasters. willis, you're based in new york and cover the us. how has not been received? i paras

how has not been received? i was surrised how has not been received? i was surprised a _ how has not been received? i was surprised a story _ how has not been received? i was surprised a story about _ how has not been received? i was surprised a story about the post office _ surprised a story about the post office reaches _ surprised a story about the post office reaches his _ surprised a story about the post office reaches his side - surprised a story about the post office reaches his side of- surprised a story about the post office reaches his side of the i surprised a story about the post i office reaches his side of the pond, but it— office reaches his side of the pond, but it wasn't — office reaches his side of the pond, but it wasn't warranted _ office reaches his side of the pond, but it wasn't warranted and - office reaches his side of the pond, but it wasn't warranted and it i office reaches his side of the pond, but it wasn't warranted and it was i but it wasn't warranted and it was deserved — but it wasn't warranted and it was deserved to — but it wasn't warranted and it was deserved to get _ but it wasn't warranted and it was deserved to get international- deserved to get international coverage, _ deserved to get international coverage, because _ deserved to get international coverage, because it- deserved to get international coverage, because it was i deserved to get international coverage, because it was sol coverage, because it was so shocking _ coverage, because it was so shocking at _ coverage, because it was so shocking. at the _ coverage, because it was so shocking. at the end - coverage, because it was so shocking. at the end of- coverage, because it was so shocking. at the end of thei coverage, because it was so i shocking. at the end of the day, coverage, because it was so - shocking. at the end of the day, it revoived _ shocking. at the end of the day, it revolved around _ shocking. at the end of the day, it revolved around human _ shocking. at the end of the day, it revolved around human beings, i shocking. at the end of the day, it i revolved around human beings, around middle-class— revolved around human beings, around middle—class people _ revolved around human beings, around middle—class people who _ revolved around human beings, around middle—class people who were - revolved around human beings, around middle—class people who were really i middle—class people who were really victims _ middle—class people who were really victims of— middle—class people who were really victims of a — middle—class people who were really victims of a really _ middle—class people who were really victims of a really quite _ middle—class people who were really victims of a really quite horrific- victims of a really quite horrific scheme — victims of a really quite horrific scheme in _ victims of a really quite horrific scheme. in looking _ victims of a really quite horrific scheme. in looking at- victims of a really quite horrific scheme. in looking at this i scheme. in looking at this tit-for-tat, _ scheme. in looking at this tit—for—tat, the _ scheme. in looking at this tit—for—tat, the correction| scheme. in looking at this l tit—for—tat, the correction is scheme. in looking at this - tit—for—tat, the correction is who exactly— tit—for—tat, the correction is who exactly is — tit—for—tat, the correction is who exactly is telling _ tit—for—tat, the correction is who exactly is telling the _ tit—for—tat, the correction is who exactly is telling the truth. i tit—for—tat, the correction is who exactly is telling the truth. a i exactly is telling the truth. a going — exactly is telling the truth. a going forward, _ exactly is telling the truth. a going forward, i— exactly is telling the truth. a going forward, i guess - exactly is telling the truth. a going forward, i guess it's. exactly is telling the truth. a| going forward, i guess it's an opportunity— going forward, i guess it's an opportunity for— going forward, i guess it's an opportunity for labour- going forward, i guess it's an opportunity for labour to i going forward, i guess it's an i opportunity for labour to muddy going forward, i guess it's an - opportunity for labour to muddy the waters— opportunity for labour to muddy the waters try— opportunity for labour to muddy the waters by demanding _ opportunity for labour to muddy the waters by demanding the _ opportunity for labour to muddy the | waters by demanding the documents and dragging — waters by demanding the documents and dragging the _ waters by demanding the documents and dragging the issue _ waters by demanding the documents and dragging the issue out— waters by demanding the documents and dragging the issue out for- waters by demanding the documents and dragging the issue out for as i and dragging the issue out for as lon- and dragging the issue out for as long as _ and dragging the issue out for as long as possible. _ and dragging the issue out for as long as possible. if— and dragging the issue out for as long as possible. if we _ and dragging the issue out for as long as possible. if we use - and dragging the issue out for as long as possible. if we use the i and dragging the issue out for asl long as possible. if we use the us example. — long as possible. if we use the us example. it's— long as possible. if we use the us example, it's the _ long as possible. if we use the us example, it's the impeachment i example, it's the impeachment investigation _ example, it's the impeachment investigation of— example, it's the impeachment investigation of biden. - example, it's the impeachment investigation of biden. the i investigation of biden. the republicans _ investigation of biden. the republicans have - investigation of biden. the republicans have been- investigation of biden. the i republicans have been dragging investigation of biden. the - republicans have been dragging this on. republicans have been dragging this on thev've — republicans have been dragging this on. thev've treen— republicans have been dragging this on. they've been demanding - republicans have been dragging this i on. they've been demanding documents and interviews, — on. they've been demanding documents and interviews, so _ on. they've been demanding documents and interviews, so if— on. they've been demanding documents and interviews, so if they— on. they've been demanding documents and interviews, so if they can _ on. they've been demanding documents and interviews, so if they can keep- and interviews, so if they can keep pushing _ and interviews, so if they can keep pushing it — and interviews, so if they can keep pushing it on. _ and interviews, so if they can keep pushing it on. it— and interviews, so if they can keep pushing it on, it could _ and interviews, so if they can keep pushing it on, it could become i and interviews, so if they can keep pushing it on, it could become an. pushing it on, it could become an election— pushing it on, it could become an election issue. _

pushing it on, it could become an election issue. but— pushing it on, it could become an election issue. but the _ pushing it on, it could become an election issue. but the post i pushing it on, it could become an| election issue. but the post office story— election issue. but the post office storv reachedm _ election issue. but the post office story reached... people _ election issue. but the post office story reached... people are - election issue. but the post officei story reached... people are asking me. story reached... people are asking me it _ story reached... people are asking me it was — story reached... people are asking me it was so _ story reached... people are asking me. it was so shocking _ story reached... people are asking me. it was so shocking and - story reached... people are asking me. it was so shocking and it- story reached... people are asking me. it was so shocking and it is. me. it was so shocking and it is something _ me. it was so shocking and it is something that _ me. it was so shocking and it is something that could _ me. it was so shocking and it is something that could have i me. it was so shocking and it is something that could have real| something that could have real damaging _ something that could have real damaging impacts. _ something that could have real damaging impacts. [— something that could have real damaging impacts.— something that could have real damaging impacts. i “ust want to cuickl damaging impacts. i “ust want to quickly ask * damaging impacts. i “ust want to quickly ask you. _ damaging impacts. i 'ust want to quickly ask you. was]— damaging impacts. i just want to quickly ask you. was it _ damaging impacts. i just want to quickly ask you. was it covered l damaging impacts. i just want to l quickly ask you. was it covered on the us networks or on the us newspapers? how was it picked up in america? ., ., , , america? networks and different news website covering _ america? networks and different news website covering as _ america? networks and different news website covering as well. _ america? networks and different news website covering as well. i _ america? networks and different news website covering as well. i think- website covering as well. i think they managed _ website covering as well. i think they managed to _ website covering as well. i think they managed to translate i website covering as well. i think they managed to translate it i website covering as well. i thinki they managed to translate it into they managed to translate it into the case — they managed to translate it into the case that— they managed to translate it into the case that was _ they managed to translate it into the case that was the _ they managed to translate it into the case that was the little - they managed to translate it into the case that was the little manl the case that was the little man that was— the case that was the little man that was really— the case that was the little man that was really hurt _ the case that was the little man that was really hurt by this. i the case that was the little man that was really hurt by this. the similar— that was really hurt by this. the similar communities _ that was really hurt by this. the similar communities in - that was really hurt by this. the similar communities in the i that was really hurt by this. the similar communities in the us l that was really hurt by this. the i similar communities in the us rally around _ similar communities in the us rally around rural— similar communities in the us rally around rural areas... _ similar communities in the us rally around ruralareas... you're - similar communities in the us rallyi around rural areas... you're looking at 50 _ around rural areas... you're looking at 50 mites — around rural areas... you're looking at 50 mites away— around rural areas... you're looking at 50 miles away from _ around rural areas... you're looking at 50 miles away from the - around rural areas... you're looking at 50 miles away from the nearest i at 50 miles away from the nearest towns. _ at 50 miles away from the nearest towns. and — at 50 miles away from the nearest towns. and they— at 50 miles away from the nearest towns, and they rely— at 50 miles away from the nearest towns, and they rely on _ at 50 miles away from the nearest towns, and they rely on these i at 50 miles away from the nearest| towns, and they rely on these post office _ towns, and they rely on these post office is, _ towns, and they rely on these post office is, community— towns, and they rely on these post office is, community stores, - office is, community stores, whatever— office is, community stores, whatever it _ office is, community stores, whatever it may— office is, community stores, whatever it may be. - office is, community stores, whatever it may be. they. office is, community stores, - whatever it may be. they resonated with that _ whatever it may be. they resonated with that the — whatever it may be. they resonated with that. the fact _ whatever it may be. they resonated with that. the fact that _ whatever it may be. they resonated with that. the fact that they - whatever it may be. they resonated with that. the fact that they were, i with that. the fact that they were, for lack— with that. the fact that they were, for tack of— with that. the fact that they were, for lack of better— with that. the fact that they were, for lack of better phrase, - with that. the fact that they were, for lack of better phrase, screwed | for lack of better phrase, screwed over so _ for lack of better phrase, screwed over so hadtv, _ for lack of better phrase, screwed over so badly, people _ for lack of better phrase, screwed over so badly, people affected i for lack of better phrase, screwed . over so badly, people affected that. that's_ over so badly, people affected that. that's why _ over so badly, people affected that. that's why it —

over so badly, people affected that. that's why it was _ over so badly, people affected that. that's why it was covered _ over so badly, people affected that. that's why it was covered in - over so badly, people affected that. that's why it was covered in the us. tit-for-tat _ that's why it was covered in the us. tit—for—tat might _ that's why it was covered in the us. tit—for—tat might be _ that's why it was covered in the us. tit—for—tat might be as— that's why it was covered in the us. tit—for—tat might be as much! - let us not forget that drama on itv. tireless reporting from a number of journalists, including nick wallace. justine and wills, will be back to discuss. around the world and across the uk, this is bbc news. bbc news, bringing you different stories from across the uk. alexandra moved into her parents�* former home in st day a year ago, and in that time, it's been damaged by vehicles four times. and this is the damage from the most recent, and i havejust had this house completely refurbished. and this is what happened. three of those times, she says it's been buses reversing into the bollard her mum had installed 15 years ago because the house kept being damaged even then. so, i'm in a constant anxiety state. i'm constantlyjust sitting there waiting for it to happen again. i can't relax.

neighbours we spoke to say they saw this recent damage happening when a bus backed up to try and get round the corner. go cornwall bus have said they could find no evidence of this from their cctv. cornwall council told us it's open to discussing any potential practical solutions beyond the measures that are already in place here. for more stories from across the uk, head to the bbc news website. you're live with bbc news. this is the context. it's a federal holiday in the us, but the republican presidential candidate nikki haley is attending a private campaign fundraiser reception in greenville in south carolina. it's less than a week until her home state prepares to vote on saturday. donald trump's 2016 primary win helped cement his frontrunner status there. make sure you go tell everybody you know that they need -

to vote in this primary. you'd be surprised at how- many of your family and friends just vote in general elections. in a general election, we're given a choice. | m a primary, - we make our choice. two i'm still with wills and justine. she says in a primary, we make our choice, but so far, most people have not been making the choice for nikki haley. henge people have not been making the choice for nikki haley.— choice for nikki haley. have not, and it's been _ choice for nikki haley. have not, and it's been resounding, - choice for nikki haley. have not, and it's been resounding, he - choice for nikki haley. have not, l and it's been resounding, he really has. nikki haley has been campaigning nightand has. nikki haley has been campaigning night and day, especially since the new hampshire primary. she's been making the case that trump is spending more time in court room then on the campaign trail. she's also been really taking up trail. she's also been really taking up —— stepping up her attacks and saying he has in adoration for putin and inviting russia to nato last

week. it's been tough for her. it's been tough for her to breakthrough to the independent voters. she just hasn't managed to chip away at the leads. recent polls have trump still 30 points ahead. she goes into saturday facing a very tough task. she could be heading for a very big to defeat in her home state. mb? she could be heading for a very big to defeat in her home state. why has it been so tough _ to defeat in her home state. why has it been so tough for— to defeat in her home state. why has it been so tough for her, _ to defeat in her home state. why has it been so tough for her, wills? - it been so tough for her, wills? home support in his base is immovable. for better or for worse, for haley, trump has been in the headlights constantly. now we see trump with that verdict on friday. there's a sense of people, members of the republican party, seeing him as a victim. he is being aggressively targeted by the court system, by the democrats, by the left. that is energising his base,

which is just followed left. that is energising his base, which isjust followed him everywhere. as the candidates in the republican party have fallen away, you would've thought more of them would move to haley. but itjust hasn't materialised. a lot of people see trump as being someone who could easily beat biden in november 2020 as well. it’s easily beat biden in november 2020 as well. �* , . , easily beat biden in november 2020 as well. �*, . , ., . easily beat biden in november 2020 aswell. �*, . , ., . , . as well. it's a bit of an elephant in the room- — as well. it's a bit of an elephant in the room. i've _ as well. it's a bit of an elephant in the room. i've covered - as well. it's a bit of an elephant. in the room. i've covered a number of presidential elections in the us in my time. how much do you think sexism has played into the reaction that nikki haley is getting? i sexism has played into the reaction that nikki haley is getting?- that nikki haley is getting? i think trump certainly — that nikki haley is getting? i think trump certainly has _ that nikki haley is getting? i think trump certainly has been - that nikki haley is getting? i think trump certainly has been sexist i trump certainly has been sexist against — trump certainly has been sexist against nikki haley, but i alsojust feel she's — against nikki haley, but i alsojust feel she's trapped by this two party system _ feel she's trapped by this two party system that america has. when you look at _ system that america has. when you look at her— system that america has. when you look at her talking about, sheila sounds — look at her talking about, sheila sounds like an independent. 70% don't _ sounds like an independent. 70% don't want — sounds like an independent. 70%

don't want biden or trump, she says. many— don't want biden or trump, she says. many think_ don't want biden or trump, she says. many think both are too old to run for president. she's stuck, but she's— for president. she's stuck, but she's a — for president. she's stuck, but she's a republican up against trump. it's a _ she's a republican up against trump. it's a great _ she's a republican up against trump. it's a great problem for nikki haley. — it's a great problem for nikki haley, but also for american democracy, because you have her unhappiness across the united states that people are faced with later this yeah — that people are faced with later this year. i'm afraid that is the reality— this year. i'm afraid that is the reality that everybody has to face. nikki _ reality that everybody has to face. nikki haley clearly isn't planning to get— nikki haley clearly isn't planning to get up— nikki haley clearly isn't planning to get up yet. you have to admire her for— to get up yet. you have to admire her for that — to get up yet. you have to admire her for that-— to get up yet. you have to admire her for that. some people say they don't rive her for that. some people say they don't give up _ her for that. some people say they don't give up until— her for that. some people say they don't give up until they _ her for that. some people say they don't give up until they run - her for that. some people say they don't give up until they run out - her for that. some people say they don't give up until they run out of. don't give up until they run out of money. we are in february, i even lost the month! what do you do in the middle of february? let's assume

donald trump is the republican candidate. who do you think he will pick as his vp? it’s candidate. who do you think he will pick as his vp?— pick as his vp? it's a great question- i _ pick as his vp? it's a great question. i think— pick as his vp? it's a great question. i think it - pick as his vp? it's a great question. i think it could i pick as his vp? it's a great| question. i think it could be somebody that possibly, for a wider world, _ somebody that possibly, for a wider world, there are a number of contenders. a number of them are women, _ contenders. a number of them are women, probably in the trump mould. being _ women, probably in the trump mould. being quite _ women, probably in the trump mould. being quite reactionary innocence. there _ being quite reactionary innocence. there are — being quite reactionary innocence. there are a — being quite reactionary innocence. there are a number of names firing. you didnt— there are a number of names firing. you didn't give me a name! will, maybe you will give me a name. this maybe you will give me a name. is justine said, maybe you will give me a name. 23 justine said, there maybe you will give me a name. 2.3 justine said, there are lots maybe you will give me a name. 23 justine said, there are lots of names floating around, and the trump criteria is i guess changing a lot and quite frequently. it will be an opportunity to take an approach. a name personally that i've seen and thought maybe a good... i guess opportunity for him would be christie known, the governor of

south dakota, who is relatively unknown. she is very staunchly conservative state and she is a woman, which does help trump especially. but he could also pick somebody like tim scott, african american man and a republican, and also ramaswamy —— vivek ramaswamy. at least you said a name, unlike justine. i rememberwhen at least you said a name, unlike justine. i remember when sarah palin came out at that convention, and that was a big surprise when she joined john mccain. who knows? there could be a complete surprise this year. that's assuming that mr trump is indeed republican nominee. now it's time for the panel. this is the part of the show where we let our panel decide what we talk about. let me start with wills. what

would you like to discuss? i’m would you like to discuss? i'm talkin: would you like to discuss? i'm talking about _ would you like to discuss? i�*m! talking about how biden is getting through the day and how aides are protecting him. we know the special report said that biden had been memories problems and diminished faculties. now we get a deeper look from the west wing from different reporting. how they are essentially bubble wrapping him throughout the day, and as we get close the campaign, this will be very important. he's going to be on tv a lot more. we're looking at him going up lot more. we're looking at him going up the stairs of airport one —— air force one. he has tripped and fallen a few times, so they have put an agent of the bottom of the stairs to make sure that he doesn't fall over. we'll see more picture of him wearing trainers or sneakers to help

his balance. it's very stage—managed. his aides are very much... they fear if they fall —— he falls over or stumbles or slips up again, it could be very devastating for his reelection campaign, especially on the back of this report last week. the white house were furious at this report, but ultimately, it really resonated with the voters. his age is a huge factor going forward, and it's going to be want to keep an eye on. the white house staff have their work cut out for them. , , . , u, for them. justine, a brief comment before he moved _ for them. justine, a brief comment before he moved your _ for them. justine, a brief comment before he moved your topic? - for them. justine, a brief comment before he moved your topic? i- for them. justine, a brief comment| before he moved your topic? i think it's actually — before he moved your topic? i think it's actually really _ before he moved your topic? i think it's actually really important - it's actually really important because _ it's actually really important because it goes back to this concern people _ because it goes back to this concern people have about how old biden is and whether he's physically capable of being _ and whether he's physically capable of being us president for another term _ of being us president for another term it's — of being us president for another term. it's why the conversation on whos— term. it's why the conversation on who's running as their vice president candidates is so important. it might matter. i�*m

president candidates is so important. it might matter. i'm 'ust auoin to important. it might matter. i'm 'ust going to let— important. it might matter. i'm 'ust going to let you fl important. it might matter. i'm 'ust going to ioi you get i important. it might matter. i'm 'ust going to let you get your * important. it might matter. i'm 'ust going to let you get your topic h important. it might matter. i'mjust going to let you get your topic that l going to let you get your topic that you wanted us to discuss. off you go? you wanted us to discuss. off you ro? , ., �*, you wanted us to discuss. off you ro? , ., �* , ., you wanted us to discuss. off you no? , ., you wanted us to discuss. off you go? news that's out today showing there's a new _ go? news that's out today showing there's a new dog _ go? news that's out today showing there's a new dog in _ go? news that's out today showing there's a new dog in town. - go? news that's out today showing there's a new dog in town. it - there's a new dog in town. it tappled _ there's a new dog in town. it toppled the dog pots. it is the goldendoodle. research by a rehoming company— goldendoodle. research by a rehoming company for pets as looked at which less popular breed, it's a goldendoodle. move over, cockatoos, i'm goldendoodle. move over, cockatoos, i'rn afraid _ goldendoodle. move over, cockatoos, i'm afraid yourtime goldendoodle. move over, cockatoos, i'm afraid your time in the sun is now— i'm afraid your time in the sun is now over — i'm afraid your time in the sun is now over "— i'm afraid your time in the sun is now over. —— cockapoos. i�*m i'm afraid your time in the sun is now over. -- cockapoos. i'm very lad now over. -- cockapoos. i'm very glad you _ now over. -- cockapoos. i'm very glad you mentioned _ now over. -- cockapoos. i'm very glad you mentioned this, - now over. -- cockapoos. i'm very| glad you mentioned this, because now over. -- cockapoos. i'm very - glad you mentioned this, because i'm going to show you my dog. she is a rescue from india. she was found in lodi garland —— lodi garden in delhi. i've never had a dog in my life. my mum and the rest of my family are furious, but isn't she cute? she's called bivvy, which means god is, and she's quite a diva. i'm all for rescue dogs ——

goddess. her breed is an indian pariah, so there you go. that's very much. that's it for the context welcome to the bbc sport centre. crystal palace's new manager oliver glasner watched on from the stands as his side drew i—i against everton at goodison park. the home side came into this 5 points below palace, sitting in the relegation zone — both sides struggling with form and in desperate need of three points. the 49—year—old austrian replaces roy hodgson, who stepped down on monday. and after everton missed a big chance — with james tarkowski's header well saved. palace opened the scoring from almost nowhere,

thanks tojordan ayew and this lovely strike. at the back post. before amadou onana found the equaliser from a header at the back post. a draw would take everton out of the bottom three on goal difference, while palace would remain five points off the drop zone. former entract frankfurt boss oliver glasner was announced a few hours before kick—off after roy hogdson stepped down earlier on monday. hodgson, who's 76, was taken ill during training on thursday last week, amid reports he was going to be sacked. the club say that he is now out of hospital and doing well, but in the same statement announced that his second managerial spell at the club had come to an end. glasner�*s first game in charge will be on saturday against burnley. manchester united have made an official approach to newcastle united for their sporting director dan ashworth. earlier on monday, newcastle confirmed that ashworth had been placed on gardening leave after requesting his release. the newcastle chief, regarded as one of the best sporting directors in the game, is at the top of sirjim ratcliffe's

list to front up his new football operation at old trafford. harry kane says there can be "no hiding from a tough week" with bayern munich's performances, "well below the level they expect of themselves". they've lost three games in a row for the first time in nine years. it started with that chastening defeat to league leaders bayer leverkusen, then a first leg loss to lazio in the champions league before going down 3—2 at mid—table bochum on sunday. here's the german football writer and broadcaster rafael honigstein. to lose three games in a row is a bayern code is usually curtains. the fact that he's still there is i think testament for bayern not having a ready—made replacement for thomas tuchel to come in as emergency caretaker. but they are desperate to finish the season with him, and then to probably make a new start. of the question is with the way that bayern are devoid of form and confidence, no cohesion and the

team, still unpredictable even within games. they had good and terrible spells. it's hard to see how the season's going to come to any sort of happy ending at this point. freya colbert claimed gold in the women's 400 metres medley on the final day of the world aquatics championships in doha. the 19—year—old produced a strong final freestyle leg to earn her first global title in a time of four minutes, 37.14 seconds. she's been speaking to five live breakfast and explained how the last stages unfolded. it was very close. i could see the lii'l it was very close. i could see the girl next — it was very close. i could see the girl next to— it was very close. i could see the girl next to me and i wasjust trying — girl next to me and i wasjust trying to— girl next to me and i wasjust trying to catch her up. i don't have the best— trying to catch her up. i don't have the best history with close finishes, so i wasn't sure. i coutdrfl— finishes, so i wasn't sure. i couldn't see the scoreboard. the camera _ couldn't see the scoreboard. the camera was in my face. it was all 'ust camera was in my face. it was all just guite — camera was in my face. it was all just quite a — camera was in my face. it was all just quite a lot.— just quite a lot. you have to talk about the _ just quite a lot. you have to talk about the paris _ just quite a lot. you have to talk about the paris olympics. - just quite a lot. you have to talk about the paris olympics. only | just quite a lot. you have to talk. about the paris olympics. only five months away, which seems rapid. where are you in your programme.

that's how i felt. we got olympic in april. so, it was kind of a weird time. go back into the olympics. parents will be your first olympics, what board to present i think it's the environment in tokyo, but ijust think it's the environment in tokyo, but ijust think its root reminder of it not being farfrom britain. ijust think that whole environment of how the olympics in our sport brings together is of you can't get anywhere else.

just to confirm, it has finished i—i between everton and crystal palace in the premier league and you can read all about it on the bbc sport website. from me, it is all this but for now, goodbye. —— all the sport. hello there. it's staying mild for the time of year for the first half of this week, but towards the end of the week, things are set to turn colder as we pick up north—westerly winds, with increasing chance of wintry showers on hills in the north. tomorrow, though, it's going to be another mild day, and we'll see a band of rain spreading southwards across the country. but tonight, many places will be dry, variable cloud, some clear spells. most of the cloud in northern and western areas, and then we'll start to see that weather front pushing into western scotland, northern ireland, bringing outbreaks of rain here and strengthening winds. so, temperatures lifting here, but some chillier spots further south and east under the clear skies. so, for tuesday then, here's this weather front moving its way southwards and eastwards gradually through the course of the day. ahead of it, it stays mild, rather cloudy,

some glimmers of brightness here and there. but the rain, heavy at times, will spread across scotland and northern ireland through the morning period, and then start to spread southwards and eastwards across england and wales as we head into the afternoon. but behind it, it brightens up for scotland and northern ireland. sunshine, some blustery showers — a few of these could be heavy — hail and thunder across north—west scotland. ahead of the rain band, it's going to be another largely cloudy day, but very mild — 13—14 degrees here. something a bit cooler further north. that weather front moves southwards, fizzles out. it's dry, clear and chilly for a while for the first part of the night. but then the next low pressure system hurtles in off the atlantic, and the increasing cloud, wind and rain will lift those temperatures, certainly across southern and western areas. so, here it is, then — a more active system to move through for wednesday. more isobars on the charts, so it will be windy. we're looking at gales around coastal areas, particularly across northern areas, and a very wet start. some of this rain could be quite heavy, and in fact, it's falling on saturated ground, we could see some issues with localised flooding.

but the rain mostly clears out into the north sea into the afternoon. skies brighten up, although obviously there'll be some blustery showers to clear across northern and western areas. bit of a hangback of cloud for eastern england and the south—east. fairly mild again, 8—12 or 13 degrees, but that's the last of the mild days through this week. from thursday onwards, we open the floodgates to a north—westerly wind. you can see the blue colours taking over, so it will be turning chillier for all areas. and because low pressure will be nearby, it will tend to remain fairly unsettled, so temperatures dipping for all areas closer to the seasonal norm. some of the showers in the north could have a wintry element to them.

tonight at ten, a war of words between the business secretary

and the former chair of the post office about compensation for sub—postmasters. kemi badenoch says henry staunton wants revenge for being sacked, after he claimed he'd been told to delay payments to branch managers wrongly accused of fraud. alexei navalny�*s widow says her husband was killed because the kremlin couldn't break him and that she will carry on his work. translation: i will continue the work of alexei navalny, l continue to fight for our country. the crew of a british—registered cargo vessel have abandoned ship, after it was attacked by houthi fighters in the red sea. roy hodgson quits as manager of crystal palace afterfalling ill during training last week. the remarkable story behind this shot from the sea bed — we hearfrom the underwater photographer of the year.

and is this the fastest goal ever?