also have cases of parties. we also have cases of attempts made to other members of parliament, the newly elected chairperson of the traditional council has already received threats. journalists have received threats. journalists have received threats and all of this will be investigated. and my messages to everyone, especially those who are keyboard heroes, we will act without compromise. this is the main message. about using strong words, wishing death to someone at the keyboard from the safety of your home or publicly approving an assassination attempt of the leader of the slovak republic. also allow me to clearly refute all lies, all half truths and misinformation that are being spread by some of the media also. i would like to ask you all to stop giving public arenas to

conspiracy theories, hoax spreaders or different candidates into the european elections who are trying to abuse this tragic situation for political gains. let us all refrain from lies and i would like to publicly declare that the security situation in the government meeting, the security measures are at a maximum possible level. i would like to thank the slovak intelligence service for an excellent cooperation. also, iwould service for an excellent cooperation. also, i would like to state that we have adopted stricter measures only during the meeting of the slovak ukrainian government meeting. i was strongly stating this because part of the media, part of the political scene are trying to blame the security forces, the law enforcement forces for the situation. i'm stating this very

clearly, i am addressing certain media, some media, you know very well whom i am talking about, you are giving place to desperate politicians for them to spread their lies, stop doing this. in this way, you are contributing to polarising the society. also in the context of the society. also in the context of the situation, you are contributing to the fact that those who wish death to the prime minister are also wishing death to representatives of the law enforcement authorities so stop giving public space to people who are abusing this situation and trying to use it for political gains. i would like to follow up on what the deputy prime minister said, that the media need to understand that the media need to understand that today, this is no place for arguments between different political parties. also, the different political debates need to

be changed. we need to bring the society together, we need to call down and we really need to stay far from what we are slowly leaning towards. we really need to stay far from a civil warjust because we are unable to tolerate different opinions. so, the response to hate cannot be hate. this is something which we all need to understand. also, representatives of opposition and coalition parties and, last but not least, the journalists, it and coalition parties and, last but not least, thejournalists, it is and coalition parties and, last but not least, the journalists, it is a plea to you as well. i would like to assure everyone that the police force, together with the intelligence services are doing everything possible to make sure that safety and security for our elected representatives is guaranteed, also security of the

media together with the police units, we have strengthened the protection of all groups wherever there is certain threat present and we will do our utmost not to see a repetition of something that have seen yesterday. so, i would like to say very clearly that the minister of interior, the police force and all law enforcement authorities are here to guarantee safety and security because without security, there is no democracy and what happened yesterday, the attack on a prime minister of the slovak republic, is an attack on democracy and we will do our utmost to protect democracy for sub thank you very much and no space for your questions. translate mac i would like to first

of regarding the information in bago, how is_ regarding the information in bago, how is it _ regarding the information in bago, how is it possible that yesterday evening — how is it possible that yesterday evening there was a leaked video of the perpetrator where he talks about his crime _ the perpetrator where he talks about his crime. ., ., , the perpetrator where he talks about his crime. ., .,, , , ., his crime. how was it possible that this video made _ his crime. how was it possible that this video made it _ his crime. how was it possible that this video made it to _ his crime. how was it possible that this video made it to social - this video made it to social networks? i this video made it to social networks?— this video made it to social networks? ~ , ., , , networks? i think this only deep into the hate _ networks? i think this only deep into the hate because _ networks? i think this only deep into the hate because he - networks? i think this only deep into the hate because he is - networks? i think this only deep l into the hate because he is talking about_ into the hate because he is talking about his — into the hate because he is talking about his motives there. just one short— about his motives there. just one short comment.— about his motives there. just one short comment. this is exactly the an . le short comment. this is exactly the angle through _ short comment. this is exactly the angle through which _ short comment. this is exactly the angle through which you _ short comment. this is exactly the angle through which you look- short comment. this is exactly the angle through which you look at i short comment. this is exactly the | angle through which you look at the different problems, this is the first question of a press conference where we are talking about the most

serious crisis of democracy in slovakia and for you, this seems to be the biggest problem. well, also the medical documentation of the prime minister was leaked, also something that is illegal so once again, at a critical moment for us, the fact that we need to deal with the fact that we need to deal with the causes of what has happened and where this evil has grown, has hatched. i'm not going to go through all the details. we won't have so much time to answer all your questions sojust make much time to answer all your questions so just make it a point. i'm also sorry for the video to be leaked, — i'm also sorry for the video to be leaked, the _ i'm also sorry for the video to be leaked, the medical documentation of the prime _ leaked, the medical documentation of the prime minister to leak and i'm really— the prime minister to leak and i'm really sorry — the prime minister to leak and i'm really sorry that public tv is interested in this act. i would just like to— interested in this act. i would just like to explain that the police investigation, i

like to explain that the police investigation,— like to explain that the police investiaation, . , ., investigation, i have multiple other auestions investigation, i have multiple other questions but _ investigation, i have multiple other questions but i'm _ investigation, i have multiple other questions but i'm trying _ investigation, i have multiple other questions but i'm trying to - investigation, i have multiple other questions but i'm trying to get - investigation, i have multiple other questions but i'm trying to get my. questions but i'm trying to get my answers — questions but i'm trying to get my answers the _ questions but i'm trying to get my answers. the second _ questions but i'm trying to get my answers. the second question - questions but i'm trying to get my answers. the second question i i questions but i'm trying to get my. answers. the second question i have, probably— answers. the second question i have, probably at— answers. the second question i have, probably at the — answers. the second question i have, probably at the national— answers. the second question i have, probably at the national security - probably at the national security council _ probably at the national security council you — probably at the national security council you have _ probably at the national security council you have already- probably at the national security l council you have already discussed that the _ council you have already discussed that the interim _ council you have already discussed that the interim government - council you have already discussed that the interim government has l council you have already discussed - that the interim government has been set up. _ that the interim government has been set up. who— that the interim government has been set up. who will— that the interim government has been set up, who will now _ that the interim government has been set up, who will now be _ that the interim government has been set up, who will now be the _ that the interim government has been set up, who will now be the acting - set up, who will now be the acting prime _ set up, who will now be the acting prime minister— set up, who will now be the acting prime ministerand _ set up, who will now be the acting prime minister and how— set up, who will now be the acting prime minister and how the - set up, who will now be the acting. prime minister and how the situation function? _ prime minister and how the situation function? ihis— prime minister and how the situation function? , ., , ., prime minister and how the situation function? , .,, ., , prime minister and how the situation function? , ., , ., , ., function? this has not been a sub'ect function? this has not been a subject of _ function? this has not been a subject of the _ function? this has not been a subject of the national- function? this has not been a i subject of the national security council. we have discussed this with the president, the government continues to operate in a standard regime. we have our standard portfolios and when we will be in the situation where things will need to be adapted, we will do that, this is not for the first time where we are in a situation like this and we will follow the rules which have been established, at least eight years ago had similar situation, thank you. i years ago had similar situation, thank yon-— years ago had similar situation, thank you. i would be grateful if ou could thank you. i would be grateful if you could take _ thank you. i would be grateful if you could take a _ thank you. i would be grateful if you could take a question - thank you. i would be grateful if you could take a question in - you could take a question in english _ you could take a question in english you _ you could take a question in english. you seem - you could take a question in english. you seem to- you could take a question in english. you seem to be - you could take a question in - english. you seem to be pointing fairly— english. you seem to be pointing

fairly cieariy _ english. you seem to be pointing fairly clearly here _ english. you seem to be pointing fairly clearly here the _ english. you seem to be pointing fairly clearly here the blame - english. you seem to be pointing fairly clearly here the blame at. english. you seem to be pointing. fairly clearly here the blame at the media _ fairly clearly here the blame at the media and — fairly clearly here the blame at the media and at— fairly clearly here the blame at the media and at reporting _ fairly clearly here the blame at the media and at reporting that - fairly clearly here the blame at the . media and at reporting that preceded this event _ media and at reporting that preceded this event. will— media and at reporting that preceded this event. will these _ media and at reporting that preceded this event. will these tragic - media and at reporting that preceded this event. will these tragic events i this event. will these tragic events therefore _ this event. will these tragic events therefore prompt— this event. will these tragic events therefore prompt more _ this event. will these tragic events therefore prompt more action - this event. will these tragic events i therefore prompt more action against therefore prompt more action against the media _ therefore prompt more action against the media and — therefore prompt more action against the media and against— therefore prompt more action against the media and against the _ therefore prompt more action against the media and against the type - therefore prompt more action against the media and against the type of. the media and against the type of reporting — the media and against the type of reporting that _ the media and against the type of reporting that you _ the media and against the type of reporting that you have _ the media and against the type of reporting that you have been - reporting that you have been complaining _ reporting that you have been complaining about? - first of all, i would like to perhaps explain in broader terms, i'm not going to discuss internal political situation in slovakia and i'm trying to refrain from deepening the political divide but for many years, it has been the reality in slovakia that a certain part of the political spectrum, after they have left the government, they have lost their natural leaders and their place has often been felled by media

or ngos. they have been doing this especially because of their failures in elections and the frustration from multiple failures in elections which are quite visible over the last 20 years and they have brought us here. as you have heard, the radicalisation of the perpetrator has also been linked to the result of the last presidential elections which did not come to the wishes of the perpetrator but the main message applies to all of us including to me, let us now return to technical discussions, not to excessive hyperbolic situation and not scoring cheap political points by using demagoguery and populism when confronted with my political adversary. this is the main

challenge and the reason why we talk about media is that at a certain point in time, the media replaced the political opposition because political opposition was unable to argue so the media stepped in. just rel on argue so the media stepped in. just reply on my — argue so the media stepped in. just reply on my behalf, we are not biaming — reply on my behalf, we are not blaming everyone. ijust stated the facts _ blaming everyone. ijust stated the facts i_ blaming everyone. ijust stated the facts. i summed up what was reported by the _ facts. i summed up what was reported by the suspect, the perpetrator, that he — by the suspect, the perpetrator, that he is— by the suspect, the perpetrator, that he is dissatisfied with the current— that he is dissatisfied with the current government. this is the reason — current government. this is the reason why— current government. this is the reason why he decided to act and he was against — reason why he decided to act and he was against the abolition of the special— was against the abolition of the special prosecution forces, he was against _ special prosecution forces, he was against the — special prosecution forces, he was against the suspension of military aid to— against the suspension of military aid to ukraine, he was against changes— aid to ukraine, he was against changes in— aid to ukraine, he was against changes in the public tv, he was against _ changes in the public tv, he was against changes in the judiciary. this is— against changes in the judiciary. this is not— against changes in the judiciary. this is not our motive, this is information— this is not our motive, this is information from the perpetrator and i'm information from the perpetrator and i'm not— information from the perpetrator and i'm not blaming everyone. if someone feels i'm not blaming everyone. if someone feeis guiity, _ i'm not blaming everyone. if someone feels guilty, well, we are just

saying — feels guilty, well, we are just saying that this also has been publicly— saying that this also has been publicly vocalised by the opposition. by different media. you should _ opposition. by different media. you should now— opposition. by different media. you should now think twice but the information you have been provided has been _ information you have been provided has been objective and if you haven't— has been objective and if you haven't contributed to the situation which _ haven't contributed to the situation whichjust— haven't contributed to the situation whichjust merely haven't contributed to the situation which just merely disagreeing with something actually leads to taking a weapon— something actually leads to taking a weapon and shooting a person. i can wholeheartedly disagree with you and probably— wholeheartedly disagree with you and probably i do disagree with you, with many— probably i do disagree with you, with many of you, but i respect your opinion— with many of you, but i respect your opinion and — with many of you, but i respect your opinion and would never cross my mind _ opinion and would never cross my mind to _ opinion and would never cross my mind to decide that an argument should _ mind to decide that an argument should evolve to an act of attempted murder~ _ should evolve to an act of attempted murder~ so _ should evolve to an act of attempted murder. so perhaps also you in the bbc or— murder. so perhaps also you in the bbc or any— murder. so perhaps also you in the bbc or any other broadcasting service, — bbc or any other broadcasting service, you should verify the facts — service, you should verify the facts we _ service, you should verify the facts. we are just wishing for objective _ facts. we are just wishing for objective information in order to prevent— objective information in order to prevent further radicalisation of

such— prevent further radicalisation of such that — prevent further radicalisation of such that we have seen who will believe — such that we have seen who will believe that the abolition of special— believe that the abolition of special prosecution service is a sufficient — special prosecution service is a sufficient reason to shoot a man. any further— sufficient reason to shoot a man. any further questions? is sufficient reason to shoot a man. any further questions? is slovakia a safe country? _ any further questions? is slovakia a safe country? was _ any further questions? is slovakia a safe country? was it _ any further questions? is slovakia a safe country? was it possible - any further questions? is slovakia a safe country? was it possible for. safe country? was it possible for intelligence _ safe country? was it possible for intelligence services _ safe country? was it possible for intelligence services to - safe country? was it possible for intelligence services to catch - safe country? was it possible forl intelligence services to catch such a tone _ intelligence services to catch such a tone wotf — intelligence services to catch such a lone wolf and _ intelligence services to catch such a lone wolf and also, _ intelligence services to catch such a lone wolf and also, interior- a lone wolf and also, interior minister. _ a lone wolf and also, interior minister, from _ a lone wolf and also, interior minister, from the _ a lone wolf and also, interior minister, from the 20 - a lone wolf and also, interiorl minister, from the 20 second a lone wolf and also, interior- minister, from the 20 second video, can we _ minister, from the 20 second video, can we deduct— minister, from the 20 second video, can we deduct what _ minister, from the 20 second video, can we deduct what were _ minister, from the 20 second video, can we deduct what were the - minister, from the 20 second video,| can we deduct what were the reasons for acting _ can we deduct what were the reasons for acting for— can we deduct what were the reasons for acting for this _ can we deduct what were the reasons for acting for this perpetrator, - can we deduct what were the reasons for acting for this perpetrator, is- for acting for this perpetrator, is that enough. _ for acting for this perpetrator, is that enough, shouldn't - for acting for this perpetrator, is that enough, shouldn't this - for acting for this perpetrator, is that enough, shouldn't this be . for acting for this perpetrator, is that enough, shouldn't this be a| for acting for this perpetrator, is. that enough, shouldn't this be a job of the _ that enough, shouldn't this be a job of the investigator? _ that enough, shouldn't this be a “0b of the investigator?�* that enough, shouldn't this be a “0b of the investigator? when informing about reasons, _ of the investigator? when informing about reasons, i _ of the investigator? when informing about reasons, i am _ of the investigator? when informing about reasons, i am not _ of the investigator? when informing about reasons, i am not basing - of the investigator? when informing about reasons, i am not basing myl about reasons, i am not basing my information— about reasons, i am not basing my information on that 20 second video. secondly, _ information on that 20 second video. secondly, i— information on that 20 second video. secondly, i have said quite clearly that the _ secondly, i have said quite clearly that the cooperation between law

enforcement agencies is on a significantly higher level than we had in _ significantly higher level than we had in the previous government. we had in the previous government. we had information on of the national security— had information on of the national security council that this was a lone _ security council that this was a lone wolf— security council that this was a lone wolf who was radicalised in the most _ lone wolf who was radicalised in the most recent period of the presidential elections, he hasn't been _ presidential elections, he hasn't been active on social media and such cases, _ been active on social media and such cases. it _ been active on social media and such cases. it is _ been active on social media and such cases, it is very difficult to predict _ cases, it is very difficult to predict attacks... studio: that is the slovakian interior minister speaking. also we had from the deputy prime minister and defence minister about the attack yesterday on roberto fico, the slovakian prime minister. his deputy prime ministers saying that there had been a maximum effort by medical staff to stabilise his condition. in his words, he said his colleague was stabilised but not beyond a risk to life. he said one of the biggest tragedies of yesterday was that we see how

disagreements with other political opinions can translate into a murder attempt. there was an interesting discussion with the interior minister who was talking about the role of various people and organisations. he talked about individuals, 32 suspects who had shed opinions on social media who are being investigated by police, people who had shed opinions supporting the attack on the prime minister. he said police would apprehend and interrogate them. he called on all in society to calm down and to not be keyboard warriors and there was that question which you will have heard asking the interior minister if this would prompt more action against the media. the interior minister replied to that saying it was important that people could disagree but respect different opinions. so, that is the latest from bratislava on the attack

yesterday on roberto fico, the prime minister who remains in hospital seriously ill with multiple gunshot wounds and what we were told were extensive injuries as a result of that gun attack and a response as well from his cabinet to the implications of this attack. we will bring you more details from slovakia as we get them. but now we are going to the united states... lawyers will resume their cross—examination of his former lawyer and fixer michael cohen at mr trump's criminal trial in new york. in court on tuesday, mr trump's lawyers tried to portray mr cohen as being bitter and untruthful. donald trump's former fixer, who made the payment to a porn star, stormy daniels, at the centre of the case, will be cross—examined for a third day. meanwhile donald trump has accepted president biden's challenge, to hold two debates before november's presidential election. the two front runners for the white house will go head—to—head on the 27th ofjune

and on september 10th. let's go live to new york now and speak to cbs news correspondent jarred hill. good to see you, let's talk about the court first of all and as we mentioned, further cross—examination of michael cohen by donald trump's defence team. what can we expect? so, we are expecting again for the defence forformer so, we are expecting again for the defence for former president trump to continue going after michael cohen's credibility full stop and remember, he in a lot of ways is the prosecution's key witness in this case which centres around the allegation of the form of hasn't been involved in this scheme to falsify business records, that he says were written down, to say that they were legal fees to pay michael cohen. michael cohen and the prosecutors say those were actually reimbursements the payments to stormy daniels. all of this wrapped up stormy daniels. all of this wrapped up again in the allegation that this was done to sway the election. so we are expecting for the defence to continue chipping away at michael

cohen's credibility, saying that he is someone who is not only a habitual liar but also a convicted lyre, has lied under oath. as well as someone who has a personal vendetta against former president trump and just wants to see him go to jail. so, again, we have to wait and see whether or not the jury believes michael cohen enough to convict once this case is handed over to them.— convict once this case is handed over to them. and let's talk about those debates _ over to them. and let's talk about those debates which _ over to them. and let's talk about those debates which have - over to them. and let's talk about those debates which have been i those debates which have been scheduled as well stop for those of us especially outside the united states, think it feels a little bit like a parallel universe there, you have donald trump embroiled in this criminal trial while at the same time, these debates ahead of the present or election are being set up. present or election are being set u . _ ., ., present or election are being set u . . ., ., , present or election are being set u l , ., ., , " ., up. yeah, and it is kind of interesting _ up. yeah, and it is kind of interesting because - up. yeah, and it is kind of interesting because the i up. yeah, and it is kind of. interesting because the trial actually is playing a part in the debates in a way. yesterday, in this video that president biden put out on social media, he said let's find a date to schedule, how about wednesdays, i hear you are free? that is reference to wednesday being the day that traditionally court is

not in session. we know this debate has been scheduled, the first at least, for late june has been scheduled, the first at least, for latejune which is expected to be after this trial has wrapped up. meanwhile, again as you mentioned, we have these two debates which are now set. a couple of things that are different with these, though. one, there is not going to be a studio audience, there is not going to be that ability the supporters or detractors from either side to boo or cheer, influencing the way this thing flows. we are hearing, at least from the biden administration or campaign, they would like to see the ability for the moderators at these debates to turn off the microphone of the person whose time has run out, again an effort to try and stop some of the over talking that we see often time in these and really get to the brass tacks, the facts of these two arguments we'll be hearing from these individuals. former president trump has said he wanted to see two additional debates, the biden team has so far rejected that notion.

these are also notably happening significantly earlier than usual, september and june. the reason for thatis september and june. the reason for that is that early voting here in the united states, although the election itself isn't until november, early voting opens as early as september so making sure these debates have as much of an impact as they will on voters who seem to be pretty entrenched with their respective candidates. jarred hill, thank their respective candidates. jarred hill. thank you — their respective candidates. jarred hill, thank you very _ their respective candidates. jarred hill, thank you very much. - their respective candidates. jarred hill, thank you very much. around the world and across the uk, this is bbc news.

president volodymyr zelensky visits kharkiv, ukraine's second—largest city that has come under relentless russian missile attacks over the past weeks and the administrative capital of the region targeted by a russian ground offensive. writing on social media, president zelensky said the situation in the area "remained extremely difficult" and ukraine was moving reinforcement to kharkiv

region to repel russian attacks. while in kharkiv, president zelensky said he chaired a meeting with top military commanders. let's speak to vitaliy shevchenko from bbc monitoring. tell us more about this visit by president zelensky to kharkiv along with members of his war cabinet? that is correct and it is a pretty brave thing to do given the intensity of russian attacks on this very important ukrainian city and what volodymyr zelensky said about the situation being extremely difficult but under control currently, just tells us how carefully he is trying to word his statements to the public. but the public in ukraine will know that kharkiv, the current focus of russian attacks, and when it comes

to what has been going on there, we have heard reports about russian forces making marginal but important gains across the border and kharkiv is just one hour's drive away from the russian border. currently, the most intensive fighting centres on a town called off chance, to the north—east of kharkiv —— vovchansk. russian forces have captured parts of it, the hospital possibly and ukrainian interior minister has said there is evidence, reports of russian troops in vovchansk executing civilians who are desperate to escape, desperate to fully. i desperate to escape, desperate to full . ., desperate to escape, desperate to full . . ., ., ., ., fully. i wanted to ask about that, vitali , fully. i wanted to ask about that, vitaliy. about _ fully. i wanted to ask about that, vitaliy, about those _ fully. i wanted to ask about that, vitaliy, about those reports - vitaliy, about those reports specifically. has there been any verification of those reports of the

killing of civilians fleeing the area? ., . , ., killing of civilians fleeing the area? ., ., , ., ., area? not really. on the one hand, liven how area? not really. on the one hand, given how dangerous _ area? not really. on the one hand, given how dangerous the _ area? not really. on the one hand, given how dangerous the situation l area? not really. on the one hand, l given how dangerous the situation is in vovchansk, it is difficult to expect any credible evidence or reports to emerge from there. but of course, we have seen russian forces do something like that before in other parts of ukraine. one example that the ukrainian interior minister gave was allegedly a civilian from vovchansk trying to escape on foot, disobeying russian forces' orders and he was apparently shot according to the ukrainian official and that is the kind of story we have heard before. what happens next is going to be crucial because on the one hand, russian troops are going to be very keen to continue advancing in the kharkiv region until american

armaments reach ukrainian forces there. but on the other hand, ukraine will be fighting desperately to hold this advance. that's partly the reason why volodymyr zelensky visited kharkiv to give reassurance, both to troops defending kharkiv and also to reassure civilians still in the city. and it is a huge city, almost 1.5 million people live there before the war.— before the war. vitaliy, thank you very much — before the war. vitaliy, thank you very much that — scientists in britain say they have proved the theory of einstein's about the way matter plunges into black holes. they have identified for the first time the plunging region, the scientists say it is an exciting development which shows

matter responding to gravity in its strongest possible form. it also settles a long running debate among astrophysicists. let's take you back to bratislava where that news conference is continuing. that is the slovak interior minister that you are looking at there, we heard from him earlier as well as the slovakian deputy prime minister talking about the latest on the condition of slovakian prime minister roberto fico who was shot yesterday multiple times. the deputy prime minister saying the injuries caused by the bullets extensive while the prime minister was in a stable condition, he wasn't beyond risk. hello again. low pressure has been in charge of our weather as we've gone through this week, and today, once again, it's going to do the same. in fact, for the next few days, we are looking at spells of warm sunshine. but there'll be some rain around, some heavy showers

which have the potential to be thundery. so this is the low pressure driving our weather. we've got this weather front wrapped all the way around it and, currently, it's producing some rain. rain especially across parts of the south—east, east anglia, into the midlands. and it's drifting westwards into wales through the day. now, to the south of that, we're looking at some bright spells, some sunshine, but heavy showers. to the north of it, a lot of dry weather, a fair bit of sunshine, but you could still catch the odd sharp shower across north—west england, in through parts of northern ireland and western scotland. temperatures, widely, 13 to about 20, 21 degrees. but we could well see 23 or 2a somewhere in the highlands. now, through this evening and overnight, the rain will continue to push through wales and clear. more low cloud, mist and murk will come in from the north sea and we'll have some clear skies. so here, too, you could see some patchy fog form. temperatures falling away between seven and about ten degrees. so for some, slightly lower than last night. so a fresher start to the day tomorrow. tomorrow, essentially, is going to be a day of sunshine and some showers.

not all of us, of course, will see the showers. and at times, we'll have some haar and also some fret coming in from the north sea just lapping onshore. temperatures tomorrow, not too dissimilar to today. again, we could see a 23 somewhere in the highlands, 21 in london, 22 in glasgow. so then as we head on into saturday, well, we've got rain coming into the south, and through the day, that's going to be drifting westwards. it will turn more showery, but it could still be heavy, with some thunder in it. further north, we're looking at some brighter skies. still some low cloud, mist and murk coming in from the north sea. some sunshine as well. temperatures — 12 to about 22 degrees. then as we move on into sunday, we've got more of a north—easterly flow and that's going to drag in more low cloud, mist and murk from the north sea. but it will be largely dry. you could catch the odd shower across southern england at times. there'll be some sunshine as well. and these are our temperatures.

so coming down in the north—west. we're looking at a range, 11 to 20.

today at one... labour's six pledges — the party lays out key steps it would take if it wins the general election. sir keir starmer�*s promises include more teachers and shorter nhs waiting lists. these are our first steps.

they enable us, if you like, to look the public in the eye and say, "this is our down payment on change." a man is charged with attempted murder after the shooting of slovakia's prime minister, who is still in a serious condition in hospital. here in devon, growing anger about the outbreak of a sickness bug caused by drinking contaminated water. and the royal photos that tell the story of 100 years — we visit a new exhibition. and coming up on bbc news, it's the 12th title in 13 seasons for celtic. they beat kilmarnock to seal the scottish premiership in some style.

hello, welcome to the bbc news at one.