but his side are yet to beat celtic this season. it's always more than a trophy in this country. we need to focus now on the now, on this moment, and to grab the moment. tomorrow, both sets of supporters will fill scotland's national stadium. one half, wishing for green ribbons to adorn this trophy, the other for blue. jane dougal, bbc news, hampden. time for a look at the weather. here's stav.

dozen ges of conservative mps now joined by one of the biggest tory beasts of all. housing secretary michael gove. handshakes and hugs in parliament tonight, as more and more mps bid farewell, and andrea leadsom the latest big beast to go. we hearfrom our election panel. and live from a sunak loyalist who is standing. labour's ahead in the polls but is there danger from the left, asjeremy corbyn says he'll stand against the party he led? we talk to a member of the shadow cabinet. also tonight. with policing being stretched now more than ever, could live facial recognition help? and what impact could it have

on people who get misidentified? i'm just focussed on, you know, getting through. and then all of a sudden that's when i felt the nudge on the shoulder, saying, oh, at that time i'm wanted. you could call it the big goodbye, the great resignation — perhaps a giant surrender even. tonight, as parliament is prorogued, the number of conservative mps standing down continues to grow. joe pike is here. is this all a coincidence? its is not, i is this all a coincidence? its is not. i was _ is this all a coincidence? its is not. i was in _ is this all a coincidence? its is not, i was in parliament- is this all a coincidence? its is| not, i was in parliament earlier today, not that many people were there but those who were, looked some of them downhearted, a lot of mps carrying big bags out of their offices as they go back to their constituencies for now at least, what has been remarkable today is one we have passed the 1977 levels of conservatives quitting parliament we have reached the number of 80. partly is because there are loads of conservative mps because they are in

power, they have a majority but there are a whole host of other reasons but of course it is a big factor that there are some conservatives who don't want to run, and lose, or run and win and be in a parliament where they are no longer in power, we haven't even got to the meat of the campaign, all of that could change, but this stage all the polls are pointing in one pretty clear direction. michael gove as you mentioned tonight, a big beast leaving the politicaljungle. a fascinating character, because he didn't reach one of the four great offices of state but he has outlasted many of his contemporaries like david cameron, borisjohnson, theresa may, a legacy he would argue in terms of brexit, free schools and some housing policy but if we take a step back, what we are seeing is a loss of conservative experience in parliament, but also, a generational

change in the party, the conservatives after selection will look a lot younger. lats conservatives after selection will look a lot younger.— conservatives after selection will look a lot younger. lots more people like clark. look a lot younger. lots more people like clark- let — look a lot younger. lots more people like clark. let us _ look a lot younger. lots more people like clark. let us talk— look a lot younger. lots more people like clark. let us talk to _ look a lot younger. lots more people like clark. let us talk to the - like clark. let us talk to the panel. let's hear from our panel: sienna rodgers, senior writer at the house magazine, james heale, political correspondent at the spectator, and luke tryl, uk director of more in common. now, do you, what do you think is driving this james? what are they telling you the mps? on the ground? well i think as a mix of factors as joe was saying there, i think it is about personalities and people deciding look, if you are going to go any way, they made a snap decision which brought forward, and i think that for them it is about that but a lot are thinking i am not going to keep my seat next time and really some are thinking about will we enjoy ten years of opposition, the thing about michael gove he is someone who was not onlyjust great sort of person in government, etc,

but a great thinking in the party and would have reformed think—tank he was someone would play a big part in shaping the future hoff the party and a great parliamentary performer, he could have been great in opposition, he is probably only one of two parliamentary speakers we can remember of the last ten years, that and hilary benn in the air strikes. he is a big loss.— he is a big loss. how are labour viewin: he is a big loss. how are labour viewing the _ he is a big loss. how are labour viewing the opening _ he is a big loss. how are labour viewing the opening salvos - he is a big loss. how are labour viewing the opening salvos of i he is a big loss. how are labour. viewing the opening salvos of the campaign, what is going on in the conservative party? i campaign, what is going on in the conservative party?— campaign, what is going on in the conservative party? i think they are deliahted. conservative party? i think they are delighted- i — conservative party? i think they are delighted. i mean _ conservative party? i think they are delighted. i mean the _ conservative party? i think they are delighted. i mean the fact - conservative party? i think they are delighted. i mean the fact that - conservative party? i think they are delighted. i mean the fact that so l delighted. i mean the fact that so many— delighted. i mean the fact that so many conservative mps are announcing they are _ many conservative mps are announcing they are not — many conservative mps are announcing they are not going to be standing is bad for— they are not going to be standing is bad for morale in the conservative party. _ bad for morale in the conservative party. it _ bad for morale in the conservative party, it means the more mps announce _ party, it means the more mps announce the more mps follow and someone _ announce the more mps follow and someone like michael gove asjames was saying. — someone like michael gove asjames was saying, he is such a good speaker. _ was saying, he is such a good speaker, he is so, he is so intelligent and so confident when he is doing _ intelligent and so confident when he is doing interview, he speaks so fluidly— is doing interview, he speaks so fluidly and — is doing interview, he speaks so fluidly and giving his honest

opinion— fluidly and giving his honest opinion in a way that they really lack those — opinion in a way that they really lack those media performer, so i think_ lack those media performer, so i think people in the labour party are pretty— think people in the labour party are pretty pleased about how it is going. — pretty pleased about how it is going, especially afterthat pretty pleased about how it is going, especially after that pretty dreadfui— going, especially after that pretty dreadful start in terms of the launch— dreadful start in terms of the launch of— dreadful start in terms of the launch of the campaign in the rain. yes, _ launch of the campaign in the rain. yes. yes — launch of the campaign in the rain. yes, yes. any response in any, in the polls? we yes, yes. any response in any, in the polls?— yes, yes. any response in any, in the olls? . ., ., , ., the polls? we asked voters for their reaction to keir— the polls? we asked voters for their reaction to keir starmer _ the polls? we asked voters for their reaction to keir starmer and - the polls? we asked voters for their reaction to keir starmer and rishi . reaction to keir starmer and rishi sunak's_ reaction to keir starmer and rishi sunak's speeches, _ reaction to keir starmer and rishi sunak's speeches, we _ reaction to keir starmer and rishi sunak's speeches, we did - reaction to keir starmer and rishi sunak's speeches, we did a - reaction to keir starmer and rishi sunak's speeches, we did a word i sunak's speeches, we did a word cloud _ sunak's speeches, we did a word cloud of— sunak's speeches, we did a word cloud of them, _ sunak's speeches, we did a word cloud of them, and _ sunak's speeches, we did a word cloud of them, and it _ sunak's speeches, we did a word cloud of them, and it won't - sunak's speeches, we did a word i cloud of them, and it won't surprise you to _ cloud of them, and it won't surprise you to know— cloud of them, and it won't surprise you to know the _ cloud of them, and it won't surprise you to know the word _ cloud of them, and it won't surprise you to know the word in the - cloud of them, and it won't surprise you to know the word in the centrel you to know the word in the centre of rishi _ you to know the word in the centre of rishi sunak's _ you to know the word in the centre of rishi sunak's cloud _ you to know the word in the centre of rishi sunak's cloud was - you to know the word in the centre of rishi sunak's cloud was wet. - you to know the word in the centre. of rishi sunak's cloud was wet. that was what — of rishi sunak's cloud was wet. that was what- - -— was what... it has different meanings- _ was what... it has different meanings. in _ was what... it has different meanings. in this _ was what... it has different meanings. in this case - was what... it has different meanings. in this case it i was what... it has different - meanings. in this case it meant fizzily wet- _ meanings. in this case it meant fizzily wet. keir _ meanings. in this case it meant fizzily wet. keir starmer's - meanings. in this case it meant| fizzily wet. keir starmer's wasn't all complimentary— fizzily wet. keir starmer's wasn't all complimentary buzz- fizzily wet. keir starmer's wasn't all complimentary buzz the - fizzily wet. keir starmer's wasn't i all complimentary buzz the biggest word was— all complimentary buzz the biggest word was change, _ all complimentary buzz the biggest word was change, when _ all complimentary buzz the biggest word was change, when we - all complimentary buzz the biggest word was change, when we have i all complimentary buzz the biggest. word was change, when we have done focus _ word was change, when we have done focus group _ word was change, when we have done focus group that — word was change, when we have done focus group that is _ word was change, when we have done focus group that is what _ word was change, when we have done focus group that is what we _ word was change, when we have done focus group that is what we are - focus group that is what we are hear. _ focus group that is what we are hear. it— focus group that is what we are hear. it is— focus group that is what we are hear. it is not— focus group that is what we are hear, it is not people _ focus group that is what we are hear, it is not people are - hear, it is not people are necessarily— hear, it is not people are necessarily in— hear, it is not people are necessarily in love - hear, it is not people are necessarily in love with l hear, it is not people are - necessarily in love with labour but they are _ necessarily in love with labour but they are say — necessarily in love with labour but they are say say _ necessarily in love with labour but they are say say after _ necessarily in love with labour but they are say say after 14 _ necessarily in love with labour but they are say say after 14 years - necessarily in love with labour but they are say say after 14 years it . they are say say after 14 years it is time — they are say say after 14 years it is time for— they are say say after 14 years it is time for a _ they are say say after 14 years it is time for a change _ they are say say after 14 years it is time for a change and - they are say say after 14 years it is time for a change and i- they are say say after 14 years it is time for a change and i thinkl is time for a change and i think that— is time for a change and i think that is— is time for a change and i think that is the _ is time for a change and i think that is the biggest _ is time for a change and i think that is the biggest head - is time for a change and i think that is the biggest head wind l is time for a change and i think. that is the biggest head wind the conservatives— that is the biggest head wind the

conservatives are _ that is the biggest head wind the conservatives are facing, - that is the biggest head wind the conservatives are facing, people| conservatives are facing, people 'ust conservatives are facing, people just want— conservatives are facing, people just want to. _ conservatives are facing, people just want to, even _ conservatives are facing, people just want to, even if _ conservatives are facing, people just want to, even if it _ conservatives are facing, people just want to, even if it is- conservatives are facing, people just want to, even if it is rollingl just want to, even if it is rolling the dice. — just want to, even if it is rolling the dice, take _ just want to, even if it is rolling the dice, take a _ just want to, even if it is rolling the dice, take a go _ just want to, even if it is rolling the dice, take a go with- just want to, even if it is rolling l the dice, take a go with someone else _ the dice, take a go with someone else so — the dice, take a go with someone else, ., , the dice, take a go with someone else. ., , i the dice, take a go with someone else._ i thought - the dice, take a go with someone else._ i thought you l else. so james. .. i thought you were auoin to else. so james. .. i thought you were going to say — else. so james. .. i thought you were going to say dry. _ else. so james. .. i thought you were going to say dry, luke. _ else. so james. .. i thought you were going to say dry, luke. he _ else. so james. .. i thought you were going to say dry, luke. he is - going to say dry, luke. he is accused _ going to say dry, luke. he is accused of— going to say dry, luke. he is accused of being boring. it is caettin accused of being boring. it is getting the _ accused of being boring. it is getting the right _ accused of being boring. it 3 getting the right number of candidates in place in time. absolutely, think that there a story tonight about all the thousands of pounds that have gone to michael gove's seat in surrey heath. he has a majority of round 18,000. the liberal democrats did quite well there recently and now they have to find a new candidate to go in there. it is ensuring which seats do you save? and i think right now there are very few conservatives who are really said to be safe seats across the country and i think a lot people will be wondering whether they ought to have declared, whether they were going sooner or not. it's a tough fight and as luke said the prevailing mood seems to be one of change, what is striking on labour's left is the party that are offering change which is striking... we will aet change which is striking... we will net on change which is striking... we will get on that _ change which is striking... we will get on that later, _ change which is striking... we will get on that later, stay _ change which is striking... we will get on that later, stay there - change which is striking... we will get on that later, stay there for. get on that later, stay there for

now but we will put some of this... ok, let's put some of this to kevin hollinrake, the business minister, and sunak loyalist. you are not standing down? no i am lookin: you are not standing down? no i am looking forward _ you are not standing down? no i am looking forward to _ you are not standing down? no i am looking forward to the _ you are not standing down? no i am looking forward to the general - looking forward to the general election and the campaign. what election and the campaign. what messaue election and the campaign. what message do _ election and the campaign. what message do your _ election and the campaign. what message do your think _ election and the campaign. what message do your think it - election and the campaign. what message do your think it stands out some of the biggs beasts are fleeing the ship, have you, knot bothering to fight the election?— to fight the election? i think we have a lot _ to fight the election? i think we have a lot of — to fight the election? i think we have a lot of members - to fight the election? i think we have a lot of members of- to fight the election? i think we - have a lot of members of parliament. some are bound to stand down. michael gove has been round for 20 years, i was his pps forfive year, john redwood 27 year, there is life after politics and people have different reasons for stepping down but we will have candidate, good candidates as michael said, there be new blood entering parliament and thatis new blood entering parliament and that is a good thing for parliament and we are very confident we can fight a good campaign and close that gap and get past labour, that is our objective. to gap and get past labour, that is our ob'ective. ., .

gap and get past labour, that is our ob'ective. ., , ., , ., , , objective. to begin with, obviously we wrapped _ objective. to begin with, obviously we wrapped op _ objective. to begin with, obviously we wrapped up parliamentary - objective. to begin with, obviously i we wrapped up parliamentary activity today, postalservices we wrapped up parliamentary activity today, postal services ministry got through that compensation given what happened to the sub—postmaster but the football, martins law, all dropped? i the football, martins law, all dro ed? . . the football, martins law, all dropped?— the football, martins law, all droued? the football, martins law, all dro-ned? dropped? i was delighted as you said the convictions _ dropped? i was delighted as you said the convictions were _ dropped? i was delighted as you said the convictions were overturned - the convictions were overturned today which is a monumental thing for hundreds of people, so, that was the biggest priority, it is very difficult to get in what we call wash up. you have two days to do everything and there is lots of legislation that were not progressed enough to take them through sadly but that is the way things go. they are all there to be reintroduced if we win the next election, if we don't the opposition can choose what they want to do, but, those things, it is not we have lost ambition for these things it is just, they live to fight another day. fik. these things it isjust, they live to fight another day.— these things it isjust, they live to fight another day. 0k. well, let us talk about _ to fight another day. 0k. well, let us talk about the _ to fight another day. 0k. well, let us talk about the campaign, - to fight another day. 0k. well, let us talk about the campaign, i - us talk about the campaign, i mean, do you think is working?— do you think is working? yes, i do.

i think lit work, _ do you think is working? yes, i do. i think lit work, because _ do you think is working? yes, i do. i think lit work, because i - do you think is working? yes, i do. i think lit work, because i think - i think lit work, because i think the first time, you the media as you do, the thing you will do, the things you do best, which is put both leaders under scrutiny and rishi has had a lot of that our prime minister. a lot of scrutiny, thatis prime minister. a lot of scrutiny, that is what you are there for understandably but there has been precious little scrutiny of keir starmer and lit will become evident that all he does is stand on the sidelines and criticise, he doesn't have a plan. if we have a plan. if you cast your mind back 18 months inflation was 18%, now it is 2%, the economy was forecast to go into deep recession, it is now growing faster than any other in the g7, things are turning round, people can take a risk of course and i hear the word cloud you referred to about change, but, be careful what you wish for, because keir starmer could really take us back a long way, after we have made a lot of progress. right we can see — have made a lot of progress. right

we can see that _ have made a lot of progress. right we can see that is _ have made a lot of progress. right we can see that is the _ have made a lot of progress. right we can see that is the central message but the metaphorical mishaps, it is ruth davidson who said is there a double agent in, our candidates deserve better after the sort of the remarkable introduction to the campaign with a, no umbrella, we have the titanic today, doesn't seem to be as slick as we are used to from cp h0. seem to be as slick as we are used to from cp hq— seem to be as slick as we are used to from cp hq. there are substantive ruestions to from cp hq. there are substantive questions that _ to from cp hq. there are substantive questions that people _ to from cp hq. there are substantive questions that people want _ to from cp hq. there are substantive questions that people want to - questions that people want to answer, how will we deal with the economy, how will we build on the progress of last few years? we have a clear plan, how we deal with the small boat, people coming across the channel, making the dangerous journey, we have a clear plan for that, rwanda, which will prove a massive deterrent. it that, rwanda, which will prove a massive deterrent.— that, rwanda, which will prove a massive deterrent. it hasn't proved an hint massive deterrent. it hasn't proved anything so — massive deterrent. it hasn't proved anything so far. _ massive deterrent. it hasn't proved anything so far, has _ massive deterrent. it hasn't proved anything so far, has it. _ massive deterrent. it hasn't proved anything so far, has it. you - massive deterrent. it hasn't proved anything so far, has it. you had - massive deterrent. it hasn't proved anything so far, has it. you had to l anything so far, has it. you had to pay the one person who went. i don't arree pay the one person who went. i don't a . ree with pay the one person who went. i don't agree with that. _ pay the one person who went. i don't agree with that, you _ pay the one person who went. i don't agree with that, you read, _ pay the one person who went. i don't agree with that, you read, i - pay the one person who went. i don't agree with that, you read, i am - pay the one person who went. i don't agree with that, you read, i am sure| agree with that, you read, i am sure you reported on people going to ireland rather than coming to the uk, it is having an effect. and it

will have a greater effect as it gets off the ground. so people can choose, if people want more illegal migration they can vote labourf choose, if people want more illegal migration they can vote labour f you want less, vote conservative. i get the message. _ want less, vote conservative. i get the message, labour— want less, vote conservative. i get the message, labour say - want less, vote conservative. i get the message, labour say they have a plan, we will talk to them later. later. the timing was a gamble from rishi sunak, he has taken this turn in the economy, and he has taken the timing of the flights and gone for it but he seemed to catch his own party on the hop. it but he seemed to catch his own party on the hop-— party on the hop. well, if, if you are going _ party on the hop. well, if, if you are going to _ party on the hop. well, if, if you are going to call— party on the hop. well, if, if you are going to call an _ party on the hop. well, if, if you are going to call an election - party on the hop. well, if, if you are going to call an election you | are going to call an election you have to be careful who you tell, because that can leaks out, you know the world of politics so it was very bold but he is very decisive, that is what people want in a leergesd they want somebody who takes bold decision, he done that through covid, the cost of living crisis, he turned the economy round, he will deal with the nhs, the small boats crisis, we know what he stands for, people do not know what keir starmer stands for and it would be worse than we have got now and i think it will be. fade than we have got now and i think it will be. ~ . than we have got now and i think it will be. ~ , ., .,

will be. we must leave that there. thank ou will be. we must leave that there. thank you for— will be. we must leave that there. thank you forjoining _ will be. we must leave that there. thank you forjoining us. - this might leave the labour party feeling up beat, about the general situation in the election campaign, joe pike isjust going to situation in the election campaign, joe pike is just going to talk to us now, because obviously this has been a big move in terms ofjeremy corbyn deciding to stand against the party he led only a few years back. how is labour feeling about the threat from the left and how does thisjeremy corbyn decision feed into that? it is a distraction first of all and it could take a lot of labour resource, because ideally they want to win and win clearly in this seat, but some in the party also argue that it could be the best example of how keir starmer at least would argue that his party has changed. the last general electionjeremy corbyn was labour's candidate to be prime minister although keir starmer was backing him at the time, at this time he is no longer in the party, standing against the party, so

perhaps the optics, keir starmer will use to argue the party's changed, but, there could be activists to the left of the labour party, who use that constituency as a focal point, some argue it could be a pretty messy campaign, and clear list it is one that the labour party want to win. fiic clear list it is one that the labour party want to win.— clear list it is one that the labour party want to win. 0k. well, let us seak to party want to win. 0k. well, let us speak to the _ party want to win. 0k. well, let us speak to the shadow _ party want to win. 0k. well, let us speak to the shadow transport - speak to the shadow transport secretary louise haigh, he is joining us from sheffield. thanks forjoining us, you were on jeremy corbyn's front bench, you must be sad to see this. well, look, it's, it is must be sad to see this. well, look, it's. it is far— must be sad to see this. well, look, it's, it is far from _ must be sad to see this. well, look, it's, it is far from ideal, _ must be sad to see this. well, look, it's, it is far from ideal, the - it's, it is farfrom ideal, the situation thatjeremy has landed himself in over several years how but keir starmer was absolutely right to remove him, as a labour mp, several years ago now, after he refused to apologise for his role and his leadership in the way he handled the anti—semitism crisis in the labour party, and the response

to the inquiry by the ehrc, but look, we will fight islington north just as we will fight every constituency and fight for every vote any this general election, and we are confident that with our credible but radical programme for change across the country that we can win votes across the coalition we need to build.— can win votes across the coalition we need to build. so, i can see that keir starmer— we need to build. so, i can see that keir starmer is _ we need to build. so, i can see that keir starmer is trying _ we need to build. so, i can see that keir starmer is trying to _ we need to build. so, i can see that keir starmer is trying to define - keir starmer is trying to define himself againstjeremy corbyn's labour, but in 201710 million people voted forjeremy corbyn's labour, what are you saying to those people who backed him, what are you saying to those people?— to those people? absolutely, and in, but in 2019. — to those people? absolutely, and in, but in 2019. we — to those people? absolutely, and in, but in 2019, we suffered _ to those people? absolutely, and in, but in 2019, we suffered the - to those people? absolutely, and in, but in 2019, we suffered the worst i but in 2019, we suffered the worst election defeat in our history, so, we have had to change our party, from top to bottom and keir has made no apologies for that, we have had to look out to the country, and provide a different offer at this general election. but what i would say is that it is built on the rock

of economic stability as you will have heard rachel reeves say but that doesn't mean it doesn't offer hope or change, i was proud to set out our plans last money on how we will bring railways back into public ownership, here he and ed miliband have been talking about establishing publicly owned great british energy. angela rayner has been working to set out our expansion of workers' rights, i do think there is a really credible but ambitious programme for change that we are setting out, that i believe will attract voters from across the political spectrum and as i say we will fight for every vote in every constituency. one of the issues where you may be losing voters to the left is what happened in gaza. the international court ofjustice, a development today. would a labour government agree with thejudgment

today. would a labour government agree with the judgment that israel should halt incursions into rafah? we support the international institutions that are there to uphold international humanitarian law. when we talk about states abiding by international law, there has to be a system and processes which are there to judge and uphold those laws and structures. so, keir starmer has been clear that we support the icj and the icc and we have said for a long time now that we do not support any incursion into rafah by the israeli government. there is already a humanitarian crisis on the ground. it's quite clear now that a full—scale offensive would breach international law. ., , offensive would breach international law. , ., offensive would breach international law. 0k, do you recognise that you are losin: law. 0k, do you recognise that you are losing votes _ law. 0k, do you recognise that you are losing votes on _ law. 0k, do you recognise that you are losing votes on the _ law. 0k, do you recognise that you are losing votes on the left - law. 0k, do you recognise that you are losing votes on the left to - law. 0k, do you recognise that you are losing votes on the left to the i are losing votes on the left to the greens and independents? is that ok because you are gaining votes in the

centre? fade because you are gaining votes in the centre? ~ ., because you are gaining votes in the centre? ~ . ., .,. centre? we never want to lose votes, obviousl , centre? we never want to lose votes, obviously, we don't _ centre? we never want to lose votes, obviously, we don't play fast - obviously, we don't play fast and loose with any vote. there were issues in certain constituencies and areas with the greens and independents and we have been working hard at a local and national level to rebuild trust in some of those communities and some of the people who feel very passionately and reasonably about the war in gaza. i have campaigned on the issue of palestine for many years and for recognition for many years of palestine, so i understand why people feel so passionately about this. we are working to rebuild trust. the circumstances have changed dramatically over the last few as well and that's why our position in upholding the international institutions, the icc and icj, are a crystal—clear, now. thank you. live facial recognition is being used on our streets more and more. the metropolitan police has ramped

up its use and has told newsnight it's arrested 192 people so far this year using the technology. but its use in real—time means there's very little room for error. here's james clayton. this is policing with a difference, in bethnal green, in east london. what's going on here looks to be pretty innocuous, but in fact, this is one of the most controversial uses of tech in modern policing. as people walk by this van, their faces are being scanned, checked to see if they're wanted for questioning by the police. they could be arrested on the spot. it's called live facial recognition, but questions have been raised about its accuracy. that's when i felt the nudge on the shoulder. saying, oh, at that time i wanted. and whether using it is even lawful. i think it absolutely is a wild west at the moment. that's what creates this legal uncertainty. facial recognition has become

incredibly powerful. last year, i filmed with a us company called clearview that provides facial recognition systems for us law enforcement. i gave them this photo and out pops images of me from the web. it can be astonishingly accurate. in east london, the day we filmed, the metropolitan police told the bbc that six people were arrested as a result of the tech, some for serious crimes. we spoke to people who'd been flagged by police, who confirmed that the id was correct. but that doesn't mean the system is perfect. sean is an anti—knife campaigner and works for the youth advocacy group street fathers. you're good? on his way back home in london bridge in february, he was stopped by the police. as i'm walking through, i saw a van. it wasn't plated with all the police stickers. it was a plain white van. i walked past that. i'm not really...

i'm just focused on getting to where i'm going, getting through. and then all of a sudden, that's when i felt the nudge on the shoulder, saying, oh, at that time, i'm wanted. they asked if i had id. i said no, i got my bank card. but they start asking me about fingerprints. i said no. i don't give you no fingerprints. he was held for around 20 minutes, only being let go when he provided a copy of his passport. it wasn't him. how did it make you feel? very angry. i'm doing something good. so you're guilty before proven innocent? that's how it looks to me. the bbc understands the mistake may have been due to a family resemblance. the met didn't want to comment on the stop. big brother watch, a group that campaigns against the use of facial recognition,

filmed the stop. orwell would be rolling in his grave to think about live facial recognition cameras across the streets of london. in real time, you have thousands or hundreds of thousands of people walking down the street, minding their own business who are effectively part of a police line—up. the sensible thing to do is to proactively seek people out if they're wanted by the police. the metropolitan police didn't want to be interviewed as part of this piece, but they did tell the bbc that the vast majority of its stops are correct, that only one in 33,000 people walking by its cameras are mis—id�*d. but for the people who triggered an alert, the figure is far less. according to the met�*s own figures, about one in 40 people flagged this year by the technology is a false alert. it's notjust the police, though, that uses live facial recognition. with shoplifting becoming an increasing problem, retailers have also begun using it.

sara was out shopping in a home bargains store. she's asked to remain anonymous, because she doesn't want to be associated with the crime that she was inaccurately accused of. within less than a minute, i'm approached by a store worker who is...comes up to me and he says, "you're a thief. "you need to leave the store." so he accused you of being a thief? yeah. "you've been identified as, like, someone who's stolen before. "you're banned from all home bargains, all co—op, "all sports direct. "you can never go in these shops anywhere in the uk." and i was like, "what? "why? "like, how can i fix this? sara had been flagged by a facial recognition system run by a company called facewatch. i kind of thought like, oh, will my life be the same? like, am i going to be looked at as like a shoplifter, when i've never stolen? and i was just crying and crying like the entire journey home. after challenging the match, facewatch eventually accepted

that the match was a case of mistaken identity. facewatch told the bbc. home bargains declined to comment. this technology is new and the laws governing the tech are unclear. michael birtwhistle works at the ada lovelace institute, and he's looked into the legality of this tech. we need primary legislation in order to achieve a sort of sufficient legal framework for this. in practice, that means someone being put in charge, either an existing regulator or a new regulator. it would mean someone that's setting the standards of how these technologies are used, to make sure that they are held to scientifically—validated

levels of accuracy. there are other concerns, too, that the technology misidentifies people of colour more often — an accusation that the metropolitan police disputes. people we spoke to in diverse bethnal green were broadly positive about the tech. we're advancing as humans. that's clearly a sign of advancement. so bring it on. i think it's a little bit scary. i think it represents the proliferation of surveillance into kind of every day. yeah. this is a smart technique. it's a very smart technique to get people who are not... _ who think they've gotten away - with a crime that they committed. but for how long will this technology be effective? won't criminals begin avoiding these vans? and won't shoplifters get better at concealing their identities? the question for this tech is where does it go then? fascinating film. back to the panel now. it is worth looking at the papers, something interesting going on. one story

dominating, michael gove waits, shock exit rocking tories. the daily mirror, and also the same story in the times and i. but in the daily mail, shadow chancellor makes a pledge to daily mail as, rachel reeves, i'll never play fast and loose with your money. probably more of a story if she'd said the opposite but there is a bit of ftse going on between the labour party in the daily mail, which is it not? very interesting. i wouldn't have run that as an exclusive myself. there's nothing there part from i will be a good chancellor.- there's nothing there part from i will be a good chancellor. there was a warm editorial _ will be a good chancellor. there was a warm editorial on _ will be a good chancellor. there was a warm editorial on thursday - will be a good chancellor. there was a warm editorial on thursday too. i a warm editorial on thursday too. interesting that there is such positive coverage and i've heard shadow cabinet members talking about the grey wall, another big thing. if they can get those kind of voters on board, that's a huge coup. ila

board, that's a huge coup. no paper has caused — board, that's a huge coup. no paper has caused more _ board, that's a huge coup. no paper has caused more headaches for - board, that's a huge coup. no paper. has caused more headaches for angela rayner— has caused more headaches for angela rayner and _ has caused more headaches for angela rayner and keir starmer than the daiiy— rayner and keir starmer than the daily mail, the things that they have _ daily mail, the things that they have let — daily mail, the things that they have let on. to come out on this on the front— have let on. to come out on this on the front page on the first day of the front page on the first day of the election campaign. labour are going _ the election campaign. labour are going to _ the election campaign. labour are going to be celebrating and the tories — going to be celebrating and the tories are asking how they can run these _ tories are asking how they can run these front— tories are asking how they can run these front pages. is it tories are asking how they can run these front pages.— these front pages. is it true that labour are _ these front pages. is it true that labour are making _ these front pages. is it true that labour are making gains - these front pages. is it true that labour are making gains with i these front pages. is it true that| labour are making gains with the older voters too, which we have considered an axiom of british voting that they are going to the right? voting that they are going to the riuht? ~ , ,., , voting that they are going to the riht? , ., right? absolutely. if you look at the olls, right? absolutely. if you look at the polls. the — right? absolutely. if you look at the polls, the average - right? absolutely. if you look at the polls, the average age at i right? absolutely. if you look at. the polls, the average age at which somebody— the polls, the average age at which somebody flipped _ the polls, the average age at which somebody flipped from _ the polls, the average age at which somebody flipped from voting - the polls, the average age at which i somebody flipped from voting labour to voting _ somebody flipped from voting labour to voting conservative _ somebody flipped from voting labour to voting conservative in _ somebody flipped from voting labour to voting conservative in 2019 - somebody flipped from voting labour to voting conservative in 2019 was i to voting conservative in 2019 was somewhere — to voting conservative in 2019 was somewhere in— to voting conservative in 2019 was somewhere in the _ to voting conservative in 2019 was somewhere in the mid _ to voting conservative in 2019 was somewhere in the mid 40s. - to voting conservative in 2019 was somewhere in the mid 40s. it- to voting conservative in 2019 was somewhere in the mid 40s. it is. to voting conservative in 2019 was i somewhere in the mid 40s. it is now over 65. _ somewhere in the mid 40s. it is now over 65. over— somewhere in the mid 40s. it is now over 65, over retirement age - over 65, over retirement age when you start _

over 65, over retirement age when you start saying _ over 65, over retirement age when you start saying you _ over 65, over retirement age when you start saying you are _ you start saying you are voting conservative. _ you start saying you are voting conservative. i— you start saying you are voting conservative. i think _ you start saying you are voting conservative. i think they- you start saying you are voting conservative. i think they willl you start saying you are voting l conservative. i think they will be pleased — conservative. i think they will be pleased. another— conservative. i think they will be pleased. another reason, - conservative. i think they will be pleased. another reason, the i pleased. another reason, the electorate _ pleased. another reason, the electorate are _ pleased. another reason, the electorate are most - pleased. another reason, the electorate are most fed - pleased. another reason, the electorate are most fed up i pleased. another reason, the electorate are most fed up ofj pleased. another reason, the - electorate are most fed up of chaos. they want _ electorate are most fed up of chaos. they want somebody _ electorate are most fed up of chaos. they want somebody who _ electorate are most fed up of chaos. they want somebody who will - electorate are most fed up of chaos. i they want somebody who will make the news guietened — they want somebody who will make the news quietened down, _ they want somebody who will make the news quietened down, steady— they want somebody who will make the news quietened down, steady the - they want somebody who will make the news quietened down, steady the ship. news quietened down, steady the ship and that— news quietened down, steady the ship and that kind — news quietened down, steady the ship and that kind of— news quietened down, steady the ship and that kind of headline _ news quietened down, steady the ship and that kind of headline in _ news quietened down, steady the ship and that kind of headline in the - and that kind of headline in the daily— and that kind of headline in the daily mail— and that kind of headline in the daily mail projects _ and that kind of headline in the daily mail projects that - and that kind of headline in the daily mail projects that image. | and that kind of headline in thel daily mail projects that image. i won't _ daily mail projects that image. i won't be — daily mail projects that image. i won't be fast _ daily mail projects that image. i won't be fast and _ daily mail projects that image. i won't be fast and loose, - daily mail projects that image. i| won't be fast and loose, you can trust _ won't be fast and loose, you can trust me. — won't be fast and loose, you can trust me. and _ won't be fast and loose, you can trust me, and it _ won't be fast and loose, you can trust me, and it will— won't be fast and loose, you can trust me, and it will be - won't be fast and loose, you can trust me, and it will be going. won't be fast and loose, you can l trust me, and it will be going back to quieter— trust me, and it will be going back to quieter politics. _ trust me, and it will be going back to quieter politics. it _ trust me, and it will be going back to quieter politics.— to quieter politics. it goes back to what we were _ to quieter politics. it goes back to what we were talking _ to quieter politics. it goes back to what we were talking about - to quieter politics. it goes back to i what we were talking about before, the jeremy corbyn what we were talking about before, thejeremy corbyn return as an independent, trying to take on his own party. how damaging will that be? �* . . �* . own party. how damaging will that be? �* , , �* , ., be? it's interesting, i've been on this story following _ be? it's interesting, i've been on this story following what - be? it's interesting, i've been on l this story following what happened in islington north and they will be some drama. i revealed that one islington councillor has already been suspended from the labour group because they have endorsed jeremy corbyn and promoted his campaign materials and activist sessions. clearly there will be splits within labour, people choosing actually that they have to supportjeremy corbyn because they have known him for so long, the local area. that's

a big bruising but on the other hand the labour leadership might say, well, it really defines the keir starmer project so far in opposition, which is the changed party, the changed labour party that he likes talking about. on the one hand, labourwould he likes talking about. on the one hand, labour would like to project a changed party but on the other it has that tension. it would like that efficiency of votes across the country but does that make it vulnerable in places like islington north, and thangam debbonaire's seat in bristol? pare north, and thangam debbonaire's seat in bristol? �* , , ., in bristol? are they underestimating the dancer in bristol? are they underestimating the danger of _ in bristol? are they underestimating the danger of less _ in bristol? are they underestimating the danger of less enthusiasm - the danger of less enthusiasm amongst left leaning, green leaning? no political party wants to lose voters — no political party wants to lose voters and _ no political party wants to lose voters and it _ no political party wants to lose voters and it is _ no political party wants to lose voters and it is true _ no political party wants to lose voters and it is true that - no political party wants to lose| voters and it is true that labour have _ voters and it is true that labour have had — voters and it is true that labour have had a _ voters and it is true that labour have had a dip— voters and it is true that labour have had a dip amongst - voters and it is true that labour have had a dip amongst the - voters and it is true that labour. have had a dip amongst the most progressive — have had a dip amongst the most progressive segment _ have had a dip amongst the most progressive segment of - have had a dip amongst the most progressive segment of the - progressive segment of the electorate _ progressive segment of the electorate but _ progressive segment of the electorate but it— progressive segment of the electorate but it is- progressive segment of the electorate but it is a - progressive segment of the electorate but it is a dip - progressive segment of the i electorate but it is a dip from around — electorate but it is a dip from around 67% _ electorate but it is a dip from around 67% of _ electorate but it is a dip from around 67% of the _ electorate but it is a dip from around 67% of the vote, - electorate but it is a dip from around 67% of the vote, to i electorate but it is a dip from - around 67% of the vote, to 60%. those _ around 67% of the vote, to 60%. those progressive _ around 67% of the vote, to 60%. those progressive voters - around 67% of the vote, to 60%. those progressive voters tend i around 67% of the vote, to 60%. those progressive voters tend toj around 67% of the vote, to 60%. i those progressive voters tend to be in the _ those progressive voters tend to be in the safest — those progressive voters tend to be in the safest labour— those progressive voters tend to be

in the safest labour seats. - those progressive voters tend to be in the safest labour seats. we - those progressive voters tend to bel in the safest labour seats. we might see the _ in the safest labour seats. we might see the odd — in the safest labour seats. we might see the odd couple _ in the safest labour seats. we might see the odd couple of— in the safest labour seats. we might see the odd couple of problems- in the safest labour seats. we might see the odd couple of problems in. see the odd couple of problems in places— see the odd couple of problems in places like — see the odd couple of problems in places like bristol— see the odd couple of problems in places like bristol central- see the odd couple of problems in places like bristol central and - places like bristol central and islingtom _ places like bristol central and islingtom we _ places like bristol central and islington. we spoke - places like bristol central and islington. we spoke to - places like bristol central and islington. we spoke to green| places like bristol central and - islington. we spoke to green voters in bristol. it— islington. we spoke to green voters in bristol, it was _ islington. we spoke to green voters in bristol, it was nothing _ islington. we spoke to green voters in bristol, it was nothing to - islington. we spoke to green voters in bristol, it was nothing to do - in bristol, it was nothing to do with— in bristol, it was nothing to do with gaza _ in bristol, it was nothing to do with gaza and _ in bristol, it was nothing to do with gaza and the _ in bristol, it was nothing to do. with gaza and the environment, in bristol, it was nothing to do . with gaza and the environment, it was because — with gaza and the environment, it was because they _ with gaza and the environment, it was because they don't _ with gaza and the environment, it was because they don't like - was because they don't like politics. _ was because they don't like politics. what _ was because they don't like politics. what will- was because they don't like politics. what will be - was because they don't like - politics. what will be interesting is if labour — politics. what will be interesting is if labour win— politics. what will be interesting is if labour win the election, - politics. what will be interesting is if labour win the election, dol is if labour win the election, do the greens— is if labour win the election, do the greens start _ is if labour win the election, do the greens start to _ is if labour win the election, do the greens start to cause - is if labour win the election, do the greens start to cause the i is if labour win the election, do - the greens start to cause the same problems— the greens start to cause the same problems that _ the greens start to cause the same problems that we've _ the greens start to cause the same problems that we've seen - the greens start to cause the same problems that we've seen reform i the greens start to cause the same l problems that we've seen reform uk causing _ problems that we've seen reform uk causing the _ problems that we've seen reform uk causing the tories? _ problems that we've seen reform uk causing the tories? that _ problems that we've seen reform uk causing the tories? that is _ problems that we've seen reform uk causing the tories? that is a - problems that we've seen reform uk causing the tories? that is a risk- causing the tories? that is a risk in office. — causing the tories? that is a risk in office. i— causing the tories? that is a risk in office. ~ . causing the tories? that is a risk in office. ~' ., ., causing the tories? that is a risk in office. ~' . ., . , ., in office. i think we have a clip of rishi sunak _ in office. i think we have a clip of rishi sunak from _ in office. i think we have a clip of rishi sunak from northern - in office. i think we have a clip of i rishi sunak from northern ireland. rishi sunakfrom northern ireland. let's just play that from this morning. let's just play that from this morninu. let's just play that from this morning-— let's just play that from this morninu. ~ . let's just play that from this morninu. ~ , ., morning. prime minister, we are ards morning. prime minister, we are yards away _ morning. prime minister, we are yards away from _ morning. prime minister, we are yards away from where - morning. prime minister, we are yards away from where the - morning. prime minister, we are. yards away from where the titanic was built— yards away from where the titanic was built and _ yards away from where the titanic was built and designed. _ yards away from where the titanic was built and designed. is- yards away from where the titanic was built and designed. is this - yards away from where the titanic was built and designed. is this a l was built and designed. is this a sinking — was built and designed. is this a sinking ship _ was built and designed. is this a sinking ship going _ was built and designed. is this a sinking ship going into - was built and designed. is this a sinking ship going into the - sinking ship going into the election? _ sinking ship going into the election?— sinking ship going into the election? ., ., ~ ., ., , election? looking at the last few weeks you _ election? looking at the last few weeks you can — election? looking at the last few weeks you can see _ election? looking at the last few weeks you can see that - election? looking at the last few weeks you can see that our - election? looking at the last few weeks you can see that our plan | election? looking at the last few i weeks you can see that our plan is working, inflation has returned to normal, energy bills, just today we had welcome news that they are falling, wages have been growing faster than prices and our