in new york for a second day. we will be live at the core in manhattan in the moment. sport, and for a full round—up from the bbc sport centre, here's gavin. thank you very much indeed. to the french open, and novak djokovic is looking in ominous form as he seeks to defend the men's title at roland—garros. he beat roberto carballes baena in straight sets. question marks had surrounded the three—time champion and his form, but he went through the gears to take the first two sets 6—4, 6—1. the third set was wrapped up 6—2 to ensure the world—number—one stayed on course for a record—extending 25th grand slam.

well, there is always that kind of conviction and belief inside of me that i can win at slam. i mean, that's the reason why i'm still competing at this level. that's why i'm here at this age. i would not be really competing at the slams and continuing to play professional tennis if i did not believe that i possess a quality to go all the way to the title match. alex zverev proved why he's one of the favourites this year. he breezed past david goffin in straight sets to reach the third round. zverev has reached the semifinals in his last three appearances at roland—garros. and in the women's draw, the second—seed aryna sabalenka powered through to the third round after beating moyuka uchijima in straight sets. the belarusian hasn't gone beyond the semifinals at roland garros, but is into the third round without dropping a set so far. she plays paula badosa next, one of her best friends on the tour. it's always tough to play your friend, your best friend on tour. it's always tough, but we know how

to manage that, we know how to separate court and life. so it's always great to fight against her, and i always enjoy playing against her. so we are good to separate things. the fourth—seed elena rybakina is also through after a solid straight—sets win over arantxa rus. the kazakh came through 6—3, 6—4 and will play elise mertens in the third round. england's men are just getting under way in their chase against pakistan, in the final t20 taking place at the oval and will be confident of clinching an outright series win. england won the toss and chose to bowl, with rain affecting the match a little in south london. they bowled pakistan all out for 157 just inside their 20 overs. jofra archer among the wickets as england chase a 2—0 series win. they're 1—0 up in the four—match series. the t20 world cup starts this weekend in the usa and west indies. the us women's open is under way,

and it's been a disastrous start for world—number—one nelly korda. the american was the red—hot favourite going into the second major of the year. she'd won six of her last seven tournaments but carded a ten on the par—three 12th hole leading to a round of 80, which is ten shots over par! this is the leaderboard. former amateur world—number—one andrea lee has the clubhouse lead at i—under, with tough conditions in pennsylvania catching plenty of players out so far. the new bayern munich head coach, vincent kompany, says he's isn't worried about not being the club's first choice to take charge. kompany�*s move from burnley, who got relegated from the premier league, to take over at one of the biggest clubs in the world football shocked many, but not the man himself. the aspect of being surprised is because you assume that it was the only club that called and you assume that it was the only interest i had. and you only assume that because i'm very private.

by that time, i was not surprised. i live myjob honestly too intense to speculate too much or to make any decisions whatsoever. the opportunity there was to work with great people, that's why i signed. cristiano ronaldo added yet another record to his collection as he set a new high for goals scored in a saudi pro league season. the 39—year—old struck twice in al—nassr�*s 4—2 victory over al—ittihad to take his total to 35, eclipsing abderrazak hamdallah's 3a from 2018—19. before playing his football in saudi arabia, ronaldo was named world player of the year five times. and that's all the sport for now. back with more later on. we will see you then. thanks very much, gavin. the waiting game continues for a verdict in the hush money trial of donald trump. after a short return to the courtroom earlier to rehear some clarifications on some key testimony, the jury has continued its deliberations.

in court, thejurors were read testimony from two key witnesses about meetings with mr trump — his ex—lawyer and fixer michael cohen and the former publisher of a tabloid newspaper, david pecker. the tesimonies of both are seen as key parts of the prosecution's case. just five months away from the presidential election, mr trump is facing 3a counts of falsifying business records allegedly to cover up a hush money payment to adult film star stormy daniels in the final weeks of the 2016 election. he denies the charges. this is one of a number of cases he is facing. let's hear some of what he had to say as he arrived. it's a disgrace the millions and millions of dollars they've spent daily on this case. outside it looks like it's fort knox, like they're guarding this... i've never seen so many policemen.

there he is with his daily address to the media. our north america correspondent nada tawfikjoins us now from new york. she is therefore as dutifully every day. just tell us a bit more about what happened today also and we spoke yesterday, we had the development of the jury wanted to rehear some of that testimony. just bring us up—to—date on where we are now. bring us up-to-date on where we are now. . ., ., , now. yeah, the morning was spent with the judge _ now. yeah, the morning was spent with the judge having _ now. yeah, the morning was spent with the judge having to _ now. yeah, the morning was spent with the judge having to read - now. yeah, the morning was spent with the judge having to read back| with the judge having to read back the instructions he gave earlier because — the instructions he gave earlier because the jury wanted to hear a little _ because the jury wanted to hear a little bit _ because the jury wanted to hear a little bit more about his instructions regarding what they can infer from _ instructions regarding what they can infer from certain bits of evidence. many— infer from certain bits of evidence. many referring to it as the rain metaphor, _ many referring to it as the rain metaphor, the even if you did not see the _ metaphor, the even if you did not see the rain, you could see signs that it _ see the rain, you could see signs that it had — see the rain, you could see signs that it had rained. and because jurors _ that it had rained. and because jurors are — that it had rained. and because jurors are not able to have the kind

of hard _ jurors are not able to have the kind of hard copies of those instructions, that took some time. instructions, that took sometime. equally— instructions, that took sometime. equally it— instructions, that took some time. equally it took some time to read back the — equally it took some time to read back the testimony that we spoke about— back the testimony that we spoke about irr— back the testimony that we spoke about in their questions, so quite literally— about in their questions, so quite literally court reporters re—enacted being _ literally court reporters re—enacted being the _ literally court reporters re—enacted being the witness and the prosecution in the defence as they read back— prosecution in the defence as they read back those bits of testimony. butiurors — read back those bits of testimony. but jurors now read back those bits of testimony. butjurors now for the last read back those bits of testimony. but jurors now for the last few hours — but jurors now for the last few hours have gone back into deliberations. they had a lunch break. — deliberations. they had a lunch break. but _ deliberations. they had a lunch break, but they are right back down to business. — break, but they are right back down to business, trying to decide if the prosecution prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt. find prosecution prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt.— prosecution prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt. and as we await their verdict, — a reasonable doubt. and as we await their verdict, and _ a reasonable doubt. and as we await their verdict, and they _ a reasonable doubt. and as we await their verdict, and they have - a reasonable doubt. and as we await their verdict, and they have to - a reasonable doubt. and as we await their verdict, and they have to be . their verdict, and they have to be unanimous i understand, how crazy is the us media going for this as a story at the moment? we the us media going for this as a story at the moment?— the us media going for this as a story at the moment? we are in full speculation — story at the moment? we are in full speculation mode. _ story at the moment? we are in full speculation mode. these _ story at the moment? we are in full| speculation mode. these notes from thatjurors_ speculation mode. these notes from thatjurors are really speculation mode. these notes from that jurors are really the only sign, — that jurors are really the only sign, hit _ that jurors are really the only sign, bit of reading tea leaves really— sign, bit of reading tea leaves really about what jurors may be

thinking — really about what jurors may be thinking. but of course it's only the 12_ thinking. but of course it's only the 12 individuals, the seven men and five _ the 12 individuals, the seven men and five women, regular new yorkers, in fact— and five women, regular new yorkers, in fact regular manhattanites, who know— in fact regular manhattanites, who know what — in fact regular manhattanites, who know what is happening and what they're _ know what is happening and what they're thinking. but that has not stopped — they're thinking. but that has not stopped cable news and even the network — stopped cable news and even the network from getting on legal experts — network from getting on legal experts to try to help them go through— experts to try to help them go through these questions and see perhaps— through these questions and see perhaps which side it benefits. but ithink— perhaps which side it benefits. but i think what you were here and across— i think what you were here and across the _ i think what you were here and across the board is that we are only on date _ across the board is that we are only on date two. — across the board is that we are only on date two, and it is far, far too early— on date two, and it is far, far too early to— on date two, and it is far, far too early to even _ on date two, and it is far, far too early to even read into these questions byjurors. sure, these are key hits— questions byjurors. sure, these are key hits of— questions byjurors. sure, these are key bits of testimony. sure, it relates— key bits of testimony. sure, it relates to _ key bits of testimony. sure, it relates to the larger conspiracy part rather than the covert cover apart— part rather than the covert cover apart or— part rather than the covert cover apart or falsifying business records and shall— apart or falsifying business records and shall he go to the intent question— and shall he go to the intent question here, what donald trump intended, — question here, what donald trump intended, but other than that it's really— intended, but other than that it's really hard — intended, but other than that it's really hard to guess what the jury is thinking. really hard to guess what the “ury is thinkina. , is thinking. indeed it is. live in the courtroom _ is thinking. indeed it is. live in the courtroom in _ is thinking. indeed it is. live in the courtroom in manhattan, l is thinking. indeed it is. live in l the courtroom in manhattan, but nonetheless here on the programme we will continue to speculate and chew

things over with a legal expert. we have one now. john quinn, who is a criminal lawyer, chairman and founder of the firm quinn emanuel. wish tojoin in wish to join in with everybody else and trying to understand and work out what might be happening. what do you think, what did you read into the fact that the jury had the request to hear some of the testimony again? does that give us an indication of how soon they might come back with the decision? realize come back with the decision? really inter-uretin come back with the decision? really interpreting these _ come back with the decision? really interpreting these jury _ come back with the decision? really interpreting these jury notes - come back with the decision? really interpreting these jury notes is - interpreting these jury notes is speculation _ interpreting these jury notes is speculation. you _ interpreting these jury notes is speculation. you can— interpreting these jury notes is speculation. you can drive - interpreting these jury notes is - speculation. you can drive yourself crazy— speculation. you can drive yourself crazy trying — speculation. you can drive yourself crazy trying to _ speculation. you can drive yourself crazy trying to figure _ speculation. you can drive yourself crazy trying to figure out _ speculation. you can drive yourself crazy trying to figure out what - speculation. you can drive yourself crazy trying to figure out what the i crazy trying to figure out what the jurors _ crazy trying to figure out what the jurors are — crazy trying to figure out what the jurors are thinking, _ crazy trying to figure out what the jurors are thinking, what - crazy trying to figure out what the jurors are thinking, what are - crazy trying to figure out what the jurors are thinking, what are they| jurors are thinking, what are they not asked — jurors are thinking, what are they not asked for— jurors are thinking, what are they not asked for this _ jurors are thinking, what are they not asked for this piece _ jurors are thinking, what are they not asked for this piece of- jurors are thinking, what are they. not asked for this piece of evidence and not _ not asked for this piece of evidence and not that— not asked for this piece of evidence and not that piece _ not asked for this piece of evidence and not that piece of— not asked for this piece of evidence and not that piece of evidence. - not asked for this piece of evidence and not that piece of evidence. it's| and not that piece of evidence. it's very common _ and not that piece of evidence. it's very common that _ and not that piece of evidence. it's very common that the _ and not that piece of evidence. it's very common that the jurors - and not that piece of evidence. it's very common that the jurors will. very common that the jurors will send _ very common that the jurors will send out — very common that the jurors will send out a — very common that the jurors will send out a note. _ very common that the jurors will send out a note. they— very common that the jurors will send out a note. they can - very common that the jurors will send out a note. they can do - send out a note. they can do that for the _ send out a note. they can do that for the bailiff— send out a note. they can do that for the bailiff to _ send out a note. they can do that for the bailiff to the _ send out a note. they can do that for the bailiff to the judge - send out a note. they can do that for the bailiff to the judge saying i for the bailiff to the judge saying we would — for the bailiff to the judge saying we would love _ for the bailiff to the judge saying we would love to _ for the bailiff to the judge saying we would love to hear _ for the bailiff to the judge saying we would love to hear this - for the bailiff to the judge saying we would love to hear this is- for the bailiff to the judge saying we would love to hear this is a l we would love to hear this is a money or— we would love to hear this is a money or that _ we would love to hear this is a money or that testimony - we would love to hear this is a money or that testimony in i we would love to hear this is al money or that testimony in the lawyers — money or that testimony in the lawyers to— money or that testimony in the lawyers to bait _ money or that testimony in the lawyers to bait the _ money or that testimony in the lawyers to bait the judge - money or that testimony in the lawyers to bait the judge whatl money or that testimony in the i lawyers to bait the judge what is it they really— lawyers to bait the judge what is it they really want _ lawyers to bait the judge what is it they really want to _ lawyers to bait the judge what is it they really want to hear _ lawyers to bait the judge what is it they really want to hear and - lawyers to bait the judge what is it they really want to hear and they. they really want to hear and they come _ they really want to hear and they come to— they really want to hear and they come to a — they really want to hear and they come to a conclusion _ they really want to hear and they come to a conclusion and - they really want to hear and they come to a conclusion and the - they really want to hear and they. come to a conclusion and the jurors are brought — come to a conclusion and the jurors are brought out _ come to a conclusion and the jurors are brought out in _ come to a conclusion and the jurors are brought out in the _ come to a conclusion and the jurors are brought out in the testimony is| are brought out in the testimony is

reread _ are brought out in the testimony is reread most— are brought out in the testimony is reread most of— are brought out in the testimony is reread most of i— are brought out in the testimony is reread most of i think— are brought out in the testimony is reread most of i think it's- are brought out in the testimony is reread most of i think it's very - reread most of i think it's very hard _ reread most of i think it's very hard to— reread most of i think it's very hard to form _ reread most of i think it's very hard to form any— reread most of i think it's very hard to form any conclusions i reread most of i think it's very . hard to form any conclusions but let me just _ hard to form any conclusions but let me just say— hard to form any conclusions but let me just say this, _ hard to form any conclusions but let me just say this, i_ hard to form any conclusions but let me just say this, i think it's- me just say this, i think it's possible _ me just say this, i think it's possible that _ me just say this, i think it's possible that the _ me just say this, i think it's possible that the trump - me just say this, i think it's. possible that the trump camp me just say this, i think it's- possible that the trump camp might be a little _ possible that the trump camp might be a little bit — possible that the trump camp might be a little bit nervous _ possible that the trump camp might be a little bit nervous that _ be a little bit nervous that the 'ury be a little bit nervous that the jury has— be a little bit nervous that the jury has asked _ be a little bit nervous that the jury has asked to _ be a little bit nervous that the jury has asked to read - be a little bit nervous that the jury has asked to read back i be a little bit nervous that the i jury has asked to read back three sessions — jury has asked to read back three sessions of— jury has asked to read back three sessions of david _ jury has asked to read back three sessions of david pecker's - jury has asked to read back three - sessions of david pecker's testimony in only— sessions of david pecker's testimony in only one _ sessions of david pecker's testimony in only one part— sessions of david pecker's testimony in only one part of— sessions of david pecker's testimony in only one part of michael— sessions of david pecker's testimony in only one part of michael cohen's. i in only one part of michael cohen's. now david _ in only one part of michael cohen's. now david pecker's _ in only one part of michael cohen's. now david pecker's testimony, - in only one part of michael cohen's. now david pecker's testimony, he l now david pecker's testimony, he canna _ now david pecker's testimony, he canna provided _ now david pecker's testimony, he canna provided the _ now david pecker's testimony, he canna provided the framework- now david pecker's testimony, he canna provided the framework for| now david pecker's testimony, he . canna provided the framework for the trump _ canna provided the framework for the trump cohen — canna provided the framework for the trump cohen scheme _ canna provided the framework for the trump cohen scheme to _ canna provided the framework for the trump cohen scheme to kill- canna provided the framework for the trump cohen scheme to kill negative | trump cohen scheme to kill negative stories— trump cohen scheme to kill negative stories which — trump cohen scheme to kill negative stories which is _ trump cohen scheme to kill negative stories which is a _ trump cohen scheme to kill negative stories which is a critical— trump cohen scheme to kill negative stories which is a critical part - trump cohen scheme to kill negative stories which is a critical part of - stories which is a critical part of establishing _ stories which is a critical part of establishing the _ stories which is a critical part of establishing the attent - stories which is a critical part of establishing the attent however that's _ establishing the attent however that's defined. _ establishing the attent however that's defined. pepper- establishing the attent however that's defined. pepper was- establishing the attent however that's defined. pepper was a i establishing the attent however- that's defined. pepper was a trump ally and _ that's defined. pepper was a trump ally and friend _ that's defined. pepper was a trump ally and friend to _ that's defined. pepper was a trump ally and friend to his _ that's defined. pepper was a trump ally and friend to his testimony - that's defined. pepper was a trump| ally and friend to his testimony was not impeached _ ally and friend to his testimony was not impeached the _ ally and friend to his testimony was not impeached the way _ ally and friend to his testimony was not impeached the way cohen's - ally and friend to his testimony was i not impeached the way cohen's was. so to— not impeached the way cohen's was. so to the _ not impeached the way cohen's was. so to the extent _ not impeached the way cohen's was. so to the extent the _ not impeached the way cohen's was. so to the extent the jury— not impeached the way cohen's was. so to the extent the jury views - not impeached the way cohen's was. so to the extent the jury views him i so to the extent the jury views him as sniffing — so to the extent the jury views him as sniffing as — so to the extent the jury views him as sniffing as cohen _ so to the extent the jury views him as sniffing as cohen in _ as sniffing as cohen in deliberations, - as sniffing as cohen in deliberations, that. as sniffing as cohen inl deliberations, that may as sniffing as cohen in - deliberations, that may not be a good _ deliberations, that may not be a good sign — deliberations, that may not be a good sign for— deliberations, that may not be a good sign for trump _ deliberations, that may not be a good sign for trump but - deliberations, that may not be a good sign for trump but again . deliberations, that may not be ai good sign for trump but again we deliberations, that may not be a - good sign for trump but again we are speculate and — good sign for trump but again we are speculate and hear— good sign for trump but again we are speculate and hear about _ good sign for trump but again we are speculate and hear about with the - speculate and hear about with the 'ury speculate and hear about with the jury might — speculate and hear about with the jury might be _ speculate and hear about with the jury might be thinking _ speculate and hear about with the jury might be thinking and - speculate and hear about with the . jury might be thinking and what they might— jury might be thinking and what they might be _ jury might be thinking and what they might be asking _ jury might be thinking and what they might be asking for— jury might be thinking and what they might be asking for in that _ might be asking for in that testimony _ might be asking for in that testimony-— might be asking for in that testimon . ., ~ might be asking for in that testimon . ., ,, ., testimony. indeed, and i think one auestion testimony. indeed, and i think one question remains. _ testimony. indeed, and i think one question remains. if— testimony. indeed, and i think one question remains. if mr _ testimony. indeed, and i think one question remains. if mr trump - testimony. indeed, and i think one question remains. if mr trump is l question remains. if mr trump is found guilty, what are the likely penalties that he could face? weill.

penalties that he could face? well, there is a wide _ penalties that he could face? well, there is a wide range _ penalties that he could face? well, there is a wide range of _ there is a wide range of potential penalties — there is a wide range of potential penalties he _ there is a wide range of potential penalties. he is— there is a wide range of potential penalties. he is facing _ there is a wide range of potential penalties. he is facing 34 - there is a wide range of potential penalties. he is facing 34 felonyl penalties. he is facing 34 felony counts — penalties. he is facing 34 felony counts they— penalties. he is facing 34 felony counts. they could _ penalties. he is facing 34 felony counts. they could be _ penalties. he is facing 34 felony counts. they could be acquitted | penalties. he is facing 34 felony. counts. they could be acquitted on all of _ counts. they could be acquitted on all of them — counts. they could be acquitted on all ofthem~ it— counts. they could be acquitted on all of them. it could _ counts. they could be acquitted on all of them. it could be _ counts. they could be acquitted on all of them. it could be convicted l all of them. it could be convicted on all— all of them. it could be convicted on all of— all of them. it could be convicted on all of them. _ all of them. it could be convicted on all of them. you _ all of them. it could be convicted on all of them. you could - all of them. it could be convicted on all of them. you could have i all of them. it could be convicted on all of them. you could have a| on all of them. you could have a mixed _ on all of them. you could have a mixed verdict. _ on all of them. you could have a mixed verdict. or— on all of them. you could have a mixed verdict. or you _ on all of them. you could have a mixed verdict. or you could - on all of them. you could have a| mixed verdict. or you could have on all of them. you could have a . mixed verdict. or you could have a hung _ mixed verdict. or you could have a hung jury — mixed verdict. or you could have a hungjury so— mixed verdict. or you could have a hung jury so the _ mixed verdict. or you could have a hung jury. so the judge _ mixed verdict. or you could have a hung jury. so the judge is- mixed verdict. or you could have a . hung jury. so the judge is dependent on what _ hung jury. so the judge is dependent on what he _ hung jury. so the judge is dependent on what he is — hung jury. so the judge is dependent on what he is committed _ hung jury. so the judge is dependent on what he is committed on - hung jury. so the judge is dependent on what he is committed on exactly. on what he is committed on exactly in the _ on what he is committed on exactly in the judge — on what he is committed on exactly in the judge has— on what he is committed on exactly in the judge has a _ on what he is committed on exactly in the judge has a lot _ on what he is committed on exactly in the judge has a lot of _ on what he is committed on exactly in the judge has a lot of discretion i in the judge has a lot of discretion whether— in the judge has a lot of discretion whether there _ in the judge has a lot of discretion whether there could _ in the judge has a lot of discretion whether there could be _ in the judge has a lot of discretion whether there could be jail- in the judge has a lot of discretion whether there could be jail time . whether there could be jail time or no jail— whether there could be jail time or no jail time — whether there could be jail time or no jailtime or— whether there could be jail time or no jailtime or if— whether there could be jail time or no jail time or if i or— whether there could be jail time or no jail time or if i orjust_ no jail time or if i orjust probation _ no jail time or if i orjust probation. we _ no jail time or if i orjust probation. we will- no jail time or if i orjust probation. we will have | no jail time or if i orjust. probation. we will have to no jail time or if i orjust- probation. we will have to wait no jail time or if i orjust_ probation. we will have to wait and see. probation. we will have to wait and see i_ probation. we will have to wait and see ithink— probation. we will have to wait and see. i think given _ probation. we will have to wait and see. i think given the _ probation. we will have to wait and see. i think given the political- see. i think given the political divide — see. i think given the political divide in — see. i think given the political divide in this _ see. i think given the political divide in this country, - see. i think given the political divide in this country, this - see. i think given the political. divide in this country, this case carries— divide in this country, this case carries a — divide in this country, this case carries a far _ divide in this country, this case carries a far greater— divide in this country, this case carries a far greater chance - divide in this country, this case carries a far greater chance of. carries a far greater chance of ending — carries a far greater chance of ending in _ carries a far greater chance of ending in a _ carries a far greater chance of ending ina hung— carries a far greater chance of ending in a hungjury- carries a far greater chance of ending in a hungjury than. carries a far greater chance of ending in a hung jury than a l carries a far greater chance of - ending in a hung jury than a typical criminal— ending in a hung jury than a typical criminal prosecution. _ ending in a hung jury than a typical criminal prosecution. but - ending in a hung jury than a typical criminal prosecution. but again - ending in a hung jury than a typical criminal prosecution. but again we| criminal prosecution. but again we will see _ criminal prosecution. but again we will see if— criminal prosecution. but again we will see if the _ criminal prosecution. but again we will see. if the case _ criminal prosecution. but again we will see. if the case follows - criminal prosecution. but again we will see. if the case follows a - will see. if the case follows a general— will see. if the case follows a general pattern _ will see. if the case follows a general pattern of— will see. if the case follows a general pattern of criminal. general pattern of criminal prosecutions, _ general pattern of criminal prosecutions, i— general pattern of criminal prosecutions, i would - general pattern of criminal prosecutions, i would look| general pattern of criminal. prosecutions, i would look for general pattern of criminal - prosecutions, i would look for the verdict _ prosecutions, i would look for the verdict to— prosecutions, i would look for the verdict to be _ prosecutions, i would look for the verdict to be rendered _ prosecutions, i would look for the verdict to be rendered after- prosecutions, i would look for the verdict to be rendered after lunchj verdict to be rendered after lunch tomorrow — verdict to be rendered after lunch tomorrow. ., ., ., verdict to be rendered after lunch tomorrow._ yeah, - verdict to be rendered after lunch | tomorrow._ yeah, after tomorrow. tomorrow? yeah, after lunch tomorrow. _ tomorrow. tomorrow? yeah, after lunch tomorrow. jurors, _ tomorrow. tomorrow? yeah, after lunch tomorrow. jurors, to - tomorrow. tomorrow? yeah, after lunch tomorrow. jurors, to be - lunch tomorrow. jurors, to be candid, — lunch tomorrow. jurors, to be candid, they— lunch tomorrow. jurors, to be candid, they like _ lunch tomorrow. jurors, to be candid, they like a _ lunch tomorrow. jurors, to be candid, they like a free - lunch tomorrow. jurors, to be candid, they like a free lunch| lunch tomorrow. jurors, to be - candid, they like a free lunch but i don't _ candid, they like a free lunch but i don't want — candid, they like a free lunch but i don't want to _ candid, they like a free lunch but i don't want to come _ candid, they like a free lunch but i don't want to come back - candid, they like a free lunch but i don't want to come back for - candid, they like a free lunch but i don't want to come back for the l candid, they like a free lunch but i. don't want to come back for the next week _ don't want to come back for the next week... , , .,, . .,

week... sorry but to be clear here it is to be — week... sorry but to be clear here it is to be a _ week... sorry but to be clear here it is to be a tradition _ week... sorry but to be clear here it is to be a tradition we _ week. .. sorry but to be clear here it is to be a tradition we will- it is to be a tradition we will record if you are right. you are say that your prediction is we could get a verdict 24 hours from now, because it's less time in the us where you are? i it's less time in the us where you are? ~ ., . it's less time in the us where you are? ,, . . ., ., ., are? i think after lunch tomorrow and before _ are? i think after lunch tomorrow and before the _ are? i think after lunch tomorrow and before the weekend, - are? i think after lunch tomorrow and before the weekend, jurors l are? i think after lunch tomorrow. and before the weekend, jurors are not crazy— and before the weekend, jurors are not crazy about _ and before the weekend, jurors are not crazy about coming _ and before the weekend, jurors are not crazy about coming back- and before the weekend, jurors are not crazy about coming back for- not crazy about coming back for a second _ not crazy about coming back for a second week, _ not crazy about coming back for a second week, but _ not crazy about coming back for a second week, but i'm _ not crazy about coming back for a second week, but i'm just... - not crazy about coming back for a i second week, but i'm just... these are the _ second week, but i'm just... these are the odds — second week, but i'm just... these are the odds. this— second week, but i'm just... these are the odds. this is— second week, but i'm just... these are the odds. this is what- second week, but i'm just... these are the odds. this is what the - are the odds. this is what the general— are the odds. this is what the general pattern— are the odds. this is what the general pattern of— are the odds. this is what the general pattern of criminal i general pattern of criminal prosecutions— general pattern of criminal prosecutions and - general pattern of criminal prosecutions and this - general pattern of criminal prosecutions and this is i general pattern of criminal - prosecutions and this is obviously not a _ prosecutions and this is obviously not a typical— prosecutions and this is obviously not a typical criminal— prosecutions and this is obviously not a typical criminal prosecution| not a typical criminal prosecution so i not a typical criminal prosecution so i could — not a typical criminal prosecution so i could be _ not a typical criminal prosecution so i could be totally— not a typical criminal prosecution so i could be totally wrong. - not a typical criminal prosecution so i could be totally wrong. i- not a typical criminal prosecution so i could be totally wrong. ijustj so i could be totally wrong. ijust put a _ so i could be totally wrong. ijust put a get — so i could be totally wrong. ijust put a get out _ so i could be totally wrong. ijust put a get out there. _ so i could be totally wrong. i 'ust put a get out therei put a get out there. well, if you are right. you — put a get out there. well, if you are right, you heard _ put a get out there. well, if you are right, you heard it— put a get out there. well, if you l are right, you heard it here first. of course in this case the jury has to have a unanimous decision so they will have to agree, correct? thea;r will have to agree, correct? they all have to _ will have to agree, correct? they all have to agree, _ will have to agree, correct? they all have to agree, they _ will have to agree, correct? they all have to agree, they all - will have to agree, correct? they all have to agree, they all have to agree _ all have to agree, they all have to agree one — all have to agree, they all have to agree onejuror— all have to agree, they all have to agree. onejuror can— all have to agree, they all have to agree. one juror can hold - all have to agree, they all have to agree. one juror can hold out - all have to agree, they all have to agree. one juror can hold out andj agree. one juror can hold out and that can _ agree. one juror can hold out and that can result _ agree. one juror can hold out and that can result in— agree. one juror can hold out and that can result in a _ agree. one juror can hold out and that can result in a hung - agree. one juror can hold out and that can result in a hung jury. - agree. one juror can hold out and| that can result in a hung jury. find that can result in a hung 'ury. and another question h that can result in a hung jury. another question in terms that can result in a hung jury. 2in another question in terms of procedure, if mr trump is found guilty, housley with the sentencing then come? ~

guilty, housley with the sentencing then come?— then come? well, if it follows a ical then come? well, if it follows a typical pattern. _ then come? well, if it follows a typical pattern, the _ then come? well, if it follows a typical pattern, the judge - then come? well, if it follows a typical pattern, the judge will. then come? well, if it follows a l typical pattern, the judge will ask for a probation _ typical pattern, the judge will ask for a probation report— typical pattern, the judge will ask for a probation report to - typical pattern, the judge will ask for a probation report to be - for a probation report to be prepared _ for a probation report to be prepared. there _ for a probation report to be prepared. there will- for a probation report to be prepared. there will be - prepared. there will be investigators— prepared. there will be investigators who - prepared. there will be investigators who lookl prepared. there will be - investigators who look into the events — investigators who look into the events in — investigators who look into the events in the _ investigators who look into the events in the background - investigators who look into the events in the background of. investigators who look into thei events in the background of the defendant — events in the background of the defendant and _ events in the background of the defendant and i— events in the background of the defendant and i would - events in the background of the defendant and i would say- events in the background of the defendant and i would say thisl defendant and i would say this defendant— defendant and i would say this defendant is— defendant and i would say this defendant is very _ defendant and i would say this defendant is very well— knownl defendant and i would say this i defendant is very well— known but still that's — defendant is very well— known but still that's the — defendant is very well— known but still that's the procedure. - defendant is very well— known but still that's the procedure. they. still that's the procedure. they investigate _ still that's the procedure. they investigate defendant- still that's the procedure. they investigate defendant and - still that's the procedure. they| investigate defendant and their background _ investigate defendant and their background. their— investigate defendant and their background. their social- investigate defendant and their . background. their social situation and they — background. their social situation and they give _ background. their social situation and they give that _ background. their social situation and they give that information - background. their social situation and they give that information to| and they give that information to the judge, — and they give that information to the judge, and _ and they give that information to the judge, and that's _ and they give that information to the judge, and that's supposed l and they give that information toi the judge, and that's supposed to inform _ the judge, and that's supposed to inform the — the judge, and that's supposed to inform the judge _ the judge, and that's supposed to inform the judge popped - the judge, and that's supposed to inform the judge popped my- the judge, and that's supposed to. inform the judge popped my decision about— inform the judge popped my decision about whether — inform the judge popped my decision about whether an— inform the judge popped my decision about whether an appropriate - about whether an appropriate sentence _ about whether an appropriate sentence and _ about whether an appropriate sentence and what _ about whether an appropriate sentence and what it - about whether an appropriate sentence and what it will- about whether an appropriate sentence and what it will be. | about whether an appropriate . sentence and what it will be. so that process _ sentence and what it will be. so that process can _ sentence and what it will be. so that process can take _ sentence and what it will be. so that process can take a - sentence and what it will be. so that process can take a month l sentence and what it will be. sol that process can take a month or it could _ that process can take a month or it could take — that process can take a month or it could take two _ that process can take a month or it could take two or— that process can take a month or it could take two or three _ that process can take a month or it could take two or three months. i that process can take a month or it l could take two or three months. and then after— could take two or three months. and then after that, _ could take two or three months. and then after that, the _ could take two or three months. and then after that, the judge _ could take two or three months. and then after that, the judge will- could take two or three months. and then after that, the judge will sign i then after that, the judge will sign a sentencing — then after that, the judge will sign a sentencing date _ then after that, the judge will sign a sentencing date and _ then after that, the judge will sign a sentencing date and mr- then after that, the judge will sign a sentencing date and mr trump. then after that, the judge will sign l a sentencing date and mr trump will be ordered _ a sentencing date and mr trump will be ordered to — a sentencing date and mr trump will be ordered to report— a sentencing date and mr trump will be ordered to report to _ a sentencing date and mr trump will be ordered to report to the - be ordered to report to the court for a _ be ordered to report to the court for a sentencing. _ be ordered to report to the court for a sentencing. 0k, _ be ordered to report to the court for a sentencing. 0k. it- be ordered to report to the court for a sentencing. 0k. it could bej for a sentencing. 0k. it could be two or three _ for a sentencing. it could be two or three or four for a sentencing.“ it could be two or three or four months. - for a sentencing. 0k. it could be | two or three or four months. lots for a sentencing. 0k. it could be - two or three or four months. lots of speculation — two or three or four months. lots of speculation but _ two or three or four months. lots of speculation but there _ two or three or four months. lots of speculation but there are _ two or three or four months. lots of speculation but there are lots - two or three or four months. lots of speculation but there are lots of- speculation but there are lots of unknowns which do not know the answers to but we do of course know the jury is continuing its deliberations. john quinn, thinks he could come back 24 hours from now. you have your back on the 24 hours

if you're right. for the moment, though, thank you very much. thank ou for around the world and across the uk, this is bbc news.

this is the context. if you're a social media user, you might have seen this image in your feeds this week. it's an ai—generated image with the words "all eyes on rafah". the image depicts densely—packed rows of tents stretching endlessly across a desert landscape overshadowed by mountains, alluding to the hundreds of thousands of palestinians who fled there during israel's military campaign against hamas. it's designed to raise awareness of what happened after a deadly israeli strike at a camp for displaced palestinians in rafah at the weekend and to highlight the tens of thousands who've been killed in gaza and the continued suffering hundreds of thousands of others.

so far, the post has shared by more than 44 million instagram accounts since monday. in response to the "all eyes on rafah" viral post, pro—israeli supporters have released this image. it reads "where were your eyes on october 7th?", referencing the hamas attack and the hostages who were killed or have been held since that day. hopefully we will be able to show you that second image as well in a moment. we can now speak to taylor lorenz, who's a columnist for the washington post covering technology and online culture. there is a huge, huge number of people who have shared this all eyes

on rafah post. what is fascinating is it is a i generated and when our colleagues who shares these kind of trends belief system of shared ai image ever. trends belief system of shared ai image ever-— trends belief system of shared ai image ever. yeah, that is right. it is the image ever. yeah, that is right. it is the fist — image ever. yeah, that is right. it is the first mass, _ image ever. yeah, that is right. it is the first mass, globally - image ever. yeah, that is right. it is the first mass, globally viral- image ever. yeah, that is right. it is the first mass, globally viral al | is the first mass, globally viral ai image that has reached this level of sharing. and i think with a little concerning is so people don't even realise it's ai. find concerning is so people don't even realise it's ai.— realise it's ai. and what is your take on that? _ realise it's ai. and what is your take on that? because - realise it's ai. and what is your take on that? because there i realise it's ai. and what is yourl take on that? because there are realise it's ai. and what is your - take on that? because there are some people who say, who support this campaign and say it's really important because it's raising awareness of what is happening in rafah and there are others who say it is in a i generated image and if you really want to raise awareness to show some pictures of the aftermath of what happened on sunday? aftermath of what happened on sunda ? ., aftermath of what happened on sunda ? . .. , aftermath of what happened on sunda ? ., .. , ~ aftermath of what happened on sunda ? . , ~ �*, sunday? yeah, exactly. ithink it's kind of the — sunday? yeah, exactly. ithink it's kind of the equivalent _ sunday? yeah, exactly. ithink it's kind of the equivalent of _ sunday? yeah, exactly. ithink it's kind of the equivalent of the - sunday? yeah, exactly. ithink it's kind of the equivalent of the black| kind of the equivalent of the black square from 2020 which of when people posted a black, solid black square to their fee the kind of indicates sympathy or support with the black lives matter movement. of course that was also accused of

being performative and what is concerning especially for those who care about getting images and information out about what's actually going on in rafah and gaza is that this image is crowding out images and information from actual journalists on the ground. but at the same time, it is a lot of people that he felt uncomfortable weighing in maybe don't want to post something graphic on their own feet away to voice their support. band away to voice their support. and so would ou away to voice their support. and so would you say _ away to voice their support. and so would you say this _ away to voice their support. and so would you say this is _ away to voice their support. and so would you say this is overall a - away to voice their support. and so would you say this is overall a wayl would you say this is overall a way of raising awareness or would you say this is a way of sort of desensitizing people to what is happening on the ground? i think it's both. happening on the ground? i think it's both- l— happening on the ground? i think it's both. | think _ happening on the ground? i think it's both. | think it's _ happening on the ground? i think it's both. i think it's really - it's both. i think it's really important to talk about the horrific events that happened. it's honestly just a horrible tragedy was of the footage from the ground is largely graphic but there are less graphic imagery that could be used. i do think it's sanitising and confusing

everyone. people are saying is this what gaza looks like? what is this weird snowy mountain range? what is happening and again so we cannot evenif happening and again so we cannot even if with this is al. meta has not labelled it is al. so proactively it's a bit of a mix. band proactively it's a bit of a mix. and that is proactively it's a bit of a mix. and that is the — proactively it's a bit of a mix. and that is the concern _ proactively it's a bit of a mix. and that is the concern more broadly with al and we talk about it a lot here on the programme is that it has the ability to make things that are not real look real?— the ability to make things that are not real look real? exactly. i mean i 'ust not real look real? exactly. i mean ljust found — not real look real? exactly. i mean ljust found in _ not real look real? exactly. i mean ijust found in a _ not real look real? exactly. i mean ijust found in a i _ not real look real? exactly. i mean i just found in a i generated - not real look real? exactly. i mean ijust found in a i generated image| ijust found in a i generated image of princess diana earlier. things look very realistic and when he risked a to your feet super quickly, you are not always aware of looking twice, examining the image and being that that is not quite add up. so i think we need these platforms to take better steps to proactively label this content. {lilia take better steps to proactively label this content.— take better steps to proactively label this content. 0k, thank you so much, label this content. 0k, thank you so much. taylor. _ label this content. 0k, thank you so much, taylor, putting _ label this content. ok, thank you so much, taylor, putting us— label this content. 0k, thank you so much, taylor, putting us through i much, taylor, putting us through that and as we were saying their it's the most shared ai generated

image there. and of course those behind it hope it raises awareness to what is happening in rafah. as we have been saying throughout the week here on the programme... this is the year of elections it seems, and there's another one we're watching here on the context. that's the vote for the european parliament. campaigning is under way across europe, with new meps being chosen between the 6th—9th ofjune. all 27 of the member states of the european union will vote for the 720 seats that are up for grabs. far—right parties are expected to make big gains, having already won an election in the netherlands and a stake in the governments of finland and slovakia. in italy, prime minister giorgia meloni is topping the polls. the ruling party brothers of italy has roots in postwar fascism, but has moderated in office. our rome correspondent mark lowen reports. chanting.

milan 2024, not 1924. a rally for a far—right student killed almost 50 years ago by the far left. the violence between the two sides has ended, but in italy, the birthplace of fascism, symbols, slogans, supporters live on. this might seem extraordinary, but the thing is, in italy it isn't. these kinds of demonstrations with the fascist salutes happen across the country year in, year out. some of the images associated with the dark chapters of italy's past still infuse the present. from a funeral, to a birthday party, fringe extreme groups like forza nuova operate here. they often blend with

die—hard football fans. a senior member at this celebration shouts, "who paid for this evening? who gave it to us?" adolf hitler! prompting the chant, "we're a beautiful team in the shape of a swastika. how great it is to be trained by deputy fuhrer rudolf hess." the party's leader denies nazi sympathies, but... are you a fascist? if you ask me like that, i probably would say yes. but i have to complete the term and say i'm a revolutionary. this was a regime that deported jews to death camps, that outlawed the opposition, that put political opponents in internment camps. are you denying that the fascist regime was violent and criminal? yes, absolutely, i deny it. the internment camps are things that happened with the war. the americans did it, the germans did it,

the italians did it, and so on. no government has cracked down, but some think giorgia meloni is even less likely to. she began in the neo—fascist youth... ..calling wartime dictator benito mussolini a good politician. she's now moved her party away from the far right and is set to make sweeping gains in the european elections, a figurehead for europe's other right—wingers. but critics say she still winks at her roots. journalist paolo berizzi has lived under police protection for the past five years after neofascist threats. translation: the far-right - and neofascist groups felt validated with the meloni government - because battles and slogans that had been kept on the political sidelines for years- suddenly became legitimised. giorgia meloni doesn't define herself as anti—fascist. - when you cannot do so in a republic born from anti—fascism, _

it means you have a problem. her supporters say the destruction wrought by the anti—fascist movement over the decades is why she won't use that label. being anti—fascist during the fascism was a very brave act, brave of freedom, brave for democracy. but after the falling of the fascism, being anti—fascist means violence, means a lot of young students killed. we condemn the fascism, but more than this is an obsession. so italy's past echoes into its modern day. the line between historical tribute and glorification of crimes blurred. and some fear what was once considered extreme is now mainstream. mark lowen, bbc news, rome.

you can watch mark's full documentary out of the shadows — awakening italy's past on the bbc news channel, and here in the uk, it'll be on iplayer from saturday. to bit a development we want to bring you up—to—date with. we are hearing the ap siding american officials sayjoe biden has partially lifted a ban on ukraine using us arms and strikes on russian territory to defend kharkiv. more on that and the next hour. also hearing the prime minister of slovakia has been released from the hospital and he had been of course recovering from an assassination attempt on the 15th of may. more on those stories in the next hour. this is the context. hello there. today, we've seen a mixture of sunshine and showers, a familiar mix, but fewer showers

are mostly focused on south—eastern parts of england. other eastern areas of england, though, seeing a spell of rain just for a while. that may well tend to move away temporarily. and it is going to be turning drier over the next few days as high pressure noses in from the atlantic, but we've still got that northerly wind overnight. it will bring more cloud to eastern parts of england and we'll see a bit more rain arriving later on in the night as well. further west, though, we're going to have clearer skies and lighter winds, a few short lived mist and fog patches by the end of the night and a little bit cooler where we have the clearer skies. temperatures in scotland could be down to six or seven degrees. still some cloud, though, coming in on that northerly breeze for eastern england into the midlands and may well bring with it some rain or some showers. those becoming confined to the southeast of england in the afternoon. other areas may brighten up a bit, but it's further west and further north that will have the best of the sunshine light winds as well — a very pleasant day. if anything, it's going to be a bit warmer than today. so we'll see temperatures in the sunshine getting up to 20 or 21 celsius.

again, a bit coolerfor some eastern areas of england, perhaps as it will be for saturday. there's our area of high pressure. the winds are falling lighter. even across eastern parts of england, still a northerly breeze, so maybe one or two showers here. not very many, many places will be dry, and again, we've got the sunnier skies closer to the high to the north and west of the uk, and those temperatures again reaching 20 or 21 celsius, a little bit cooler around some eastern parts of england. but temperatures are going to rise here the second half of the weekend — a change of fortunes to come. the high pressure is never quite making it to the uk. it's getting squeezed on sunday and all this cloud is coming in from the atlantic around the top of the high that will be working its way into much of scotland. northern ireland eventually bring a little rain into the far northwest, but we've still got some sunshine for england and wales and a sunny a day with lighter winds across east anglia in the south east means it's going to be warmer here as well. temperatures are going to peak at 22 or 23 degrees. still quite warm in the sunshine for eastern scotland, cooler in western scotland

with the cloud and things are going to change a bit as we head into next week. there's some rain in the forecast mainly for northern areas of the uk. further south, it's looking generally dry still and, if anything, still quite warm as well.

hello, i'm rajini vaidyanathan. you're watching the context on bbc news.

it's a disgrace the millions and millions of dollars they've spent daily on this case. outside, it looks like it's fort knox, like they guarding this... i've never seen so many policemen. it's anyone's guess how long it will take for the jury of seven men and five women, ordinary new yorkers of diverse backgrounds, to potentially reach a verdict. the complexity really- is more a matter of trying to connect the dots factually, . and trying to understand what it means to know about something, what it means to intend to do- something, particularly| when there is this other crime floating out there. joining us this week is mary—anne marsh, democratic strategist and lanhee chen, republican former domestic and foreign policy adviser to governor mitt romney