anfiicipafiion and campaign. here, the anticipation and the excitement is building up - campaign. here, the anticipation and the excitement is building up ahead i the excitement is building up ahead of that clash between mr sunak and mr starmer. televised debates can be a blessing and a curse. tefits mr starmer. televised debates can be a blessing and a curse.— a blessing and a curse. tests have revealed a — a blessing and a curse. tests have revealed a newborn _ a blessing and a curse. tests have revealed a newborn baby - discovered in a park earlier this year is the sister of two other children abandoned by the same parents. india's prime minister is claiming election victory and a third term, but the results are yet to be confirmed. i'm kylie pinto low. we will bring you all the latest on the general election shortly, but first, several major hospitals in london have declared a critical incident because of a cyberattack. some operations have been cancelled and there been problems with blood transfusions.

helen and wilkinson has this report. operations have had to be cancelled. blood transfusions and test results have been particularly affected. as have other radio ten tests. guy's and st thomas' hospital in the heart of the capital is one of the nhs trusts affected by the major it incident. king's college hospital, the royal brompton, and the evelina london children's hospital as well as other services have been affected. about 6.50 last night, i received an e—mail and a text that both had exactly the same information on, confirming that due to circumstances beyond their control, blood tests had been cancelled for the foreseeable future. nhs england describe the impact as significant, adding that emergency care continued on the available. it is is thought the incident happened yesterday, some departments were unable to connect to the main server. the it service partner has said sorry to patients impacted by the disruption, recognising the upset it has caused.

it is not clear how long the disruption to patients and services will last. helena wilkinson, bbc news. a newborn baby girl was found abandoned on a freezing cold night injanuary is the third child to be left by the same parents. the test revealed baby also is the same sibling of a boy and a girl found 2018 to 19. it was a bitterly cold day

injanuary when a baby girl, less than an hour old, was found here in east london. hospital staff called her elsa, after the frozen character. the bbc can now report that elsa has two full siblings, harry and roman. all three babies were abandoned in similar circumstances within two two miles of each other. harry was found in plaistow in september 2017, abandoned shortly after he was born. newborn roman came 16 months later, injanuary 2019, in a park close to the roman road, after which she was named. and elsa, also newborn, was discovered this year, a few hundred yards away. all three children's names have since been changed. this is where baby harry was found back in 2017. since then, two of his siblings have been abandoned in very similar circumstances, just hours after they were born. judge carol atkinson said it was very, very unusual for one baby to be abandoned in modern britain. for three babies to be left in this way, by the same parents,

was, she said, of enormous interest. i asked one of the leading experts whether she'd come across a similar case. well, i've done research in various ways for over 20 years and the answer is absolutely no. but i personally have never come across three brand—new newborns from the same parents, both parents, it seems. the three children are safe — adopted or in care. their mother has not come forward, despite multiple appeals over nearly seven years by the metropolitan police. they said today their investigation continues. sanchia berg, bbc news. the world's biggest collection was nearly a billion people registered to vote is looking likely tonight that narendra modi will win a rare third consecutive term as india's prime minister. results so far shows bjp party is falling well short of the landslide. our correspondent

reports. a widely expected moment and an historic one. a widely expected moment and a historic one. it's only the second time that an incumbent prime minister has won a third term. "it is the winner of our commitment to a developed india," mr modi told his supporters. but it isn't the victory he wanted — winning fewer seats than the last election — it will damage the air of invincibility that has surrounded him and the bjp over the past ten years. perhaps the biggest shock came from here where prime minister narendra modi inaugurated a grand hindu temple injanuary at a site that had been disputed by hindus and muslims. expected to galvanise hindu voters, but the ruling party was defeated this is how the opposition congress took in the results,

with an almost equal fervour. it's rare to see this kind ofjubilation amid the losing side, but that's because over the past ten years the congress party has has suffered humiliating election defeats. and hat that has resulted in is a party whose confidence was so low that they didn't believe they could actually launch a proper challenge. so this is a celebration for being significantly back in the game. "long live rahul gandhi," supporters chanted the name of the leader, from india's most prominent political dynasty, capabilities and future were under question. today will mark a point of resurgence.

the country has unanimously said they do not like the rule of nnaamm under modi's country. so that is a huge message to mr narendra modi. so that is a huge message to mr narendra modi. it is a bittersweet victory for the bjp. with the numbers they have got they cannot pass laws unilaterally. they will need to take others on board. some will see this as a win for indian democracy. some of the last second world war veterans are in normandy to marry 80 years since the day. it was a turning point as troops landed on the coast of northern france began liberation from nazi occupation. john maguire has this report.

for many of these veterans, their departure from the shores 80 80 years ago, all as very young man, was their first venture overseas. turne to commemoration. stan ford survived as his ship was sunk by a mini submarine, but many other members of the group were killed. as you know, john, i have 32 reasons for going back, 32 guys who never came home. i made that promise to myself that every opportunity i would go back and pay my respects and honours those guys. back and pay my respects and honours those guys. as they left portsmouth, their modern day counterparts flew overhead in a royal air force transport plane and stood to attention, saluting on the deck of the aircraft carrier hms prince ofwales, respect between the generations. john dennis has been back to normandy before but never to the british memorial.

it was very emotional and i am afraid that will probably be a bit emotional when we get there, to see the actual thing. we will rememberthem. as the ferry approached the french coastline, the engine slowed and the veterans paid tribute. so, a short, poignant, but highly symbolic ceremony as the reefs were thrown over the side of the ferry. the idea is to pay tribute to those who died before even reaching the french shores and beaches they had come here to liberate. and so to france and two full days of ceremonies and commemorations for those who can tell the story of what happened here eight years ago first—hand. the number may be dwindling, but their commitment today, as it was then, remains immense. john maguire, bbc news, normandy.

the first live campaign takes place this evening in front of the studio audience it's offered. it comes at the end of the day of campaigning dominated by the issue of migration as our political respondent alex forsyth reports. the home secretary touring a company that transports things around the uk and europe, though today, he's more concerned about the movement of people.

the conservatives might point to last year's fall in net migration — the difference between the amount of people arriving in the uk and leaving — but on their watch numbers have reached a record high. now they are saying they would cap family and work visas, though haven't put figures on it. we recognise that companies like this will, of course, need some levels of migration, but we also recognise that migration puts pressure on public services, and getting the balance right is a conversation that is long overdue. thanks for coming, everybody. part of the pressure on the tories has come from this party. they have opened up the borders to mass immigration like we have never seen before. reform uk's attracted attention, with bold promises on reducing legal immigration levels and stopping small boat crossings. for all the support... ..it seems not everyone's a fan of their approach.

nigel farage was covered in milkshake on the campaign trail. police said a woman was arrested on suspicion of assault. a messy startjust a day after taking over as party leader. earlier he had seemed to adjust his party's policy on processing asylum seekers in british overseas territories while he was on air. i don't think it's terribly practical. what, the policy you have put forward? i think it's a very difficult policy and i haven't put it forward by the way. why is it on your website? well, i took over yesterday so give me more than 12 hours for labour, immigration is another issue where keir starmer�*s keen to prove his party has changed. he says training british workers to plug skills gaps will bring immigration levels down, though again, no numbers. we can't wish them down, that's what the tories are doing, just plucking numbers and wishing and hoping for the best. you have to understand why they're high. the skills strategy isn't here, we need to fix that, and we need to bear down on bad bosses who are undercutting labour standards. there is every chance the issue will come up here tonight, when the labour and conservative leaders meet for their first head—to—head debate.

you might wonder why there can be a lot of hype around tv debates, but they can really matter. they can produce pivotal moments in an election campaign, they can set the mood and tone, and of course they provide an important opportunity of scrutiny of both policy and position, and don't forget, standing at to podiums behind me later will be the two men who are vying to become the next prime minister of the uk. the stage is set and the stakes are high. they will have just over an hour to prove themselves. alex forsyth, bbc news. all eyes on salford, where receipts are not an keir starmer head—to—head. my colleague is there for us. listen to ours to iam in i am in the so—called spin room. it

is already buzzing the journalist, but we've also seen politicians turn up but we've also seen politicians turn up as well because the purpose of this is also for the politicians, surrogates, representing either candidate to defend and protect their candidate as the one who's come out best. they're doing that for the debate and it will get even more intense win that debate is over. this is a relatively new, you may remember on what it was david cameron. it prompted a phrase from the number of mps they won this is in middle ways —— many ways an american style of television. in some ways, they can be a blessing, or they could be a curse. i'm joined by vicki young, deputy political

editor. blessing or curse? what you think both keir starmer and rishi sunak need to keep in mind tonight? i think it's important to emphasise they're coming from very different places. you have rishi sunak who's been prime minister, part of the conservative government for 14 years. he's got a record to defend. it's a catchy record, some would say, that makes it a little bit harder. he is also a very long way backin harder. he is also a very long way back in the opinion polls. loss of tory mps gloomy about it all. they need a bit of a boost, i want to give us something to cheer about, they want to see movement in the opinion polls. that's what he's going to be able to do. first keir starmer, they are aiming different. he's got to show he's notjust criticising. might be easier to oppose things. he asked to give a clear idea about what labour would

do. and people trust him? to people know about him? i think people will introduce himself of the first time for many people in this kind of format. also people may be tuning into the first time for turning in for the man who wants to be prime minister. i5 for the man who wants to be prime minister. , , ., , minister. is quite small, can see the cameras _ minister. is quite small, can see the cameras there. _ minister. is quite small, can see the cameras there. let's - minister. is quite small, can see the cameras there. let's move l the cameras there. let's move through here. this is going to be packed with politicians. you seen a home already. —— you have seen some. this is where all the print journalists it. it's notjust about an hour and ten minutes, but how the debates are written. this is the team from the sun newspaper. brian and sophia, what do your readers want from this group don't activate?

—— want from this debate? -- want from this debate? the cost of livin: -- want from this debate? the cost of living crisis, _ -- want from this debate? the cost of living crisis, what _ -- want from this debate? the cost of living crisis, what the _ -- want from this debate? the cost of living crisis, what the leaders - of living crisis, what the leaders are going — of living crisis, what the leaders are going to do about the nhs waiting — are going to do about the nhs waiting list times, and also migration. both leaders will have to come _ migration. both leaders will have to come up _ migration. both leaders will have to come up with clear answers said that to try— come up with clear answers said that to try and _ come up with clear answers said that to try and win the vote. and come up with clear answers said that to try and win the vote.— to try and win the vote. and do your readership follow _ to try and win the vote. and do your readership follow these _ to try and win the vote. and do your readership follow these political - readership follow these political debates or are they seen as a big of a turn—off? i5 debates or are they seen as a big of a turn-off?— a turn-off? is seen as a big... when the vote a turn-off? is seen as a big... when they vote later— a turn-off? is seen as a big... when they vote later on _ a turn-off? is seen as a big... when they vote later on in _ a turn-off? is seen as a big... when they vote later on in a _ they vote later on in a month's time — they vote later on in a month's time they— they vote later on in a month's time. they will be tuning in. they are really— time. they will be tuning in. they are really engaged in all the big debates — are really engaged in all the big debates. whether it's how much money in their— debates. whether it's how much money in their pocket, whether theirjobs are being — in their pocket, whether theirjobs are being affected, etc. they are really— are being affected, etc. they are really thinking about how they are going _ really thinking about how they are going to _ really thinking about how they are going to vote and they'll be tuned in to watch to see who can win. into watch to see who can win. thank— in to watch to see who can win. thank you _ in to watch to see who can win. thank you very much, ryan. sophia, let's take you back over here. the debate is an hour and ten minutes

long. it's forecast on itv. it's one of a series of debates that will be happening through the election. there will be one with the seven parties on friday. that will be on bbc news. the key about this one is the that is a head—to—head. rishi sunak and keir starmer do go head—to—head every wednesday and prime minister's questions. but as ryan was saying, this is an entirely different audience, and vicki. and it's one that could sway some underfunded voters. now it's time to look a bit more into details about how one might win. hello, we are bringing you another campaign. it's going to be in the northwest and will be quite a clash. there he

loads of cliches because even though tv debates are quite a new thing this country, they do have quite a format. so we will dig into what's going to go on, but other challenges, and yes, what cliches you can expect we are going to give you can expect we are going to give you the tools to be able to watch this debate like a pro. hello, it's adam in the studio, and joining me is henry's fn. hello, it's adam in the studio, and joining me is henry's fm.— joining me is henry's pm. great to be with yom _ joining me is henry's pm. great to be with yom is — joining me is henry's pm. great to be with you. is strange _ joining me is henry's pm. great to be with you. is strange hear - joining me is henry's pm. great to be with you. is strange hear your| be with you. is strange hear your voice on a _ be with you. is strange hear your voice on a weekday. _ be with you. is strange hear your voice on a weekday. i'm - be with you. is strange hear your voice on a weekday. i'm a - be with you. is strange hear your- voice on a weekday. i'm a seven-day o erative. voice on a weekday. i'm a seven-day operative. elections. _ voice on a weekday. i'm a seven-day operative. elections. everyone- voice on a weekday. i'm a seven-day operative. elections. everyone in! i operative. elections. everyone in! are we allowed _ operative. elections. everyone in! are we allowed to _

operative. elections. everyone in! are we allowed to reveal - operative. elections. everyone in! i are we allowed to reveal saturday? no, let's leave that as a tease. if invited, i would no, let's leave that as a tease. if invited, iwould happily no, let's leave that as a tease. if invited, i would happily accept. fin invited, iwould happily accept. on mostly impressed that you went invited, iwould happily accept. q�*t mostly impressed that you went for a run, which is something i lasted in the 2010s. there you go. my back you have to make a dash for salford soon. ~ . �* , have to make a dash for salford soon. . . �* , , have to make a dash for salford soon. , soon. what's the big political icture. soon. what's the big political picture- was _ soon. what's the big political picture. was the _ soon. what's the big political picture. was the biggest - soon. what's the big political - picture. was the biggest moment so far. picture. was the biggest moment so far- debates — picture. was the biggest moment so far. debates often _ picture. was the biggest moment so far. debates often don't _ picture. was the biggest moment so far. debates often don't change - picture. was the biggest moment so far. debates often don't change the | far. debates often don't change the course of general election campaigns. sometimes, they have done. untilthe campaigns. sometimes, they have done. until the debate happens, there is the possibility that it might alter the course of the general election. i think it's an hour or so where in a very stage—managed environment of a general election campaign, suddenly the two men who might become prime minister onjuly the 5th are not in

control. and that, i think is a really fascinating moment that put you on the spot. also it's a new way of seeing the two interact because we've seen rishi sunak and keir starmer trade blows for two years. but you don't need to tell you the house of commons is quite an artificial environment. you've got people sitting behind them making that sort of weird noise that's not quite a hackle and not by age year. and you have lindsay hoyle... ughii this sometimes doesn't come across on screen, but actually being there, the atmosphere is electric because you've got loads of those in journos and is often that alljournalists covering politics are in exactly the same place. people are normally bit or spread out. it's alsojust

same place. people are normally bit or spread out. it's also just a same place. people are normally bit or spread out. it's alsojust a big tv production. that flows of energy. then you've got huge of entourages from the parties, including advisers, some of whom you've never really see in public and what you see wondering corridors of the tv studios. plus you get the members of the cabinet you are there to spin. so much of the time and politics, we and journalists all know what's going to happen. find and journalists all know what's going to happen-— going to happen. and this is general election. i think— going to happen. and this is general election. i think so _ going to happen. and this is general election. i think so far _ going to happen. and this is general election. i think so far it's _ going to happen. and this is general election. i think so far it's been - election. i think so far it's been much news here that the first campaigns —— it's been much newsier. what has is any sort of shift the overall picture where rishi sunak was desperate to spend the first couple weeks of this campaign trying to find a way to narrow the polls. to find a way to change the

environment they face. if anything, the polls have nudged slightly towards the labour party. that adds the extra kind of edge to tonight. getting pretty late. it's also rare that a politician can flip on election in the head on one moment. it's quite high—sta kes it's quite high—stakes for keir starmer because he really has everything to lose here, find a way to hang tight and keep his lead

going. i5 to hang tight and keep his lead anoin. , , .,, to hang tight and keep his lead oiiin_ , , .,, ., going. is interesting to see some of the policies — going. is interesting to see some of the policies ahead _ going. is interesting to see some of the policies ahead of— going. is interesting to see some of the policies ahead of it. _ going. is interesting to see some of the policies ahead of it. you - going. is interesting to see some of the policies ahead of it. you have i the policies ahead of it. you have the policies ahead of it. you have the tories saying let's have a cap on the number of work and family visas that we issue. and you've got labour saying let's up to be energy. it will contribute to energy security and keeping energy bills out. they've gone for core messages to start the message off. i out. they've gone for core messages to start the message off.— to start the message off. i think it also tells you _ to start the message off. i think it also tells you which _ to start the message off. i think it also tells you which parts of- also tells you which parts of support they think are soft. for the conservatives, and this being clear throughout the first couple couple weeks, the conservatives are anxious — and will be especially after yesterday — that they might lose votes as well as the loads they are losing to labour, to the right. they are clearly is pursuing a strategy where they want to sure of that

flank. talking about immigration, this would be a policy, voted on parliament annually. that would be a big move. of course, the political risk the conservatives — and we say this on so many issues but it doesn't make it less true — they are running on a 14 year record. if you are a voter who is eager to see immigration reduced, the conservatives have a record that will not appeal to you. you can see why they might question why they should believe rishi sunak and james cleverly. should believe rishi sunak and james cleverl . ~ ., ., cleverly. what i found intriguing - it is 'ust cleverly. what i found intriguing - it is just the _ cleverly. what i found intriguing - it is just the word _ cleverly. what i found intriguing - it isjust the word change, - cleverly. what i found intriguing - it isjust the word change, is - cleverly. what i found intriguing - it is just the word change, is that l it is just the word change, is that it is just the word change, is that it appeal to how the country works. when you talk about change, we will then start to go, change to what?

then you go change from what? we start asking questions about your starmer supporting jeremy corbyn. so the change to and from becomes just as important as the idea. the change to and from becomes 'ust as important as the ideai as important as the idea. totally. you will hear _ as important as the idea. totally. you will hear is _ as important as the idea. totally. you will hear is rishi _ as important as the idea. totally. you will hear is rishi sunak in - as important as the idea. totally. | you will hear is rishi sunak in this debate. i would you will hear is rishi sunak in this debate. iwould be you will hear is rishi sunak in this debate. i would be stunned if he doesn't twice, three or four times, getting there. get in there that keir starmer tried to makejeremy keir starmer tried to make jeremy corbyn keir starmer tried to makejeremy corbyn prime minister twice because thatis corbyn prime minister twice because that is a big hitch for a labour leader who has pursued an energetic quality of anti—jeremy corbin. that has been one of the key planks of his leadership. it's an ongoing process as we've seen with some of the rows over labour selections. so,

you will hear us rishi sunak make that point and make the point for two reasons. i think the conservatives think it's a way of reminding people about the labour party that they would object to in 2019. but also a way of hitting a broader argument they make to hit a keir starmer, which is he is a bit shifty. his 2020 leadership election, he is unequivocally a banded. ,. election, he is unequivocally a banded. ., , ., , banded. safe travels and see you soon. banded. safe travels and see you soon- see _ banded. safe travels and see you soon- see you — banded. safe travels and see you soon. see you soon. _ banded. safe travels and see you soon. see you soon. let's - banded. safe travels and see you soon. see you soon. let's pick i banded. safe travels and see you . soon. see you soon. let's pick up on some of those _ soon. see you soon. let's pick up on some of those themes _ soon. see you soon. let's pick up on some of those themes with - soon. see you soon. let's pick up on some of those themes with some . some of those themes with some political professionals. not that he is not professional! we arejoined by strategists and former adviser to borisjohnsonjoe by strategists and former adviser to boris johnson joe tanner. happy birthday. boris johnson joe tanner. happy birthda . ., ~ boris johnson joe tanner. happy birthday-_ and - boris johnson joe tanner. happy birthday._ and thankl boris johnson joe tanner. happy i birthday._ and thank you birthday. thank you. and thank you for being me _ birthday. thank you. and thank you for being me a _ birthday. thank you. and thank you for being me a cake. _ birthday. thank you. and thank you for being me a cake. i _ birthday. thank you. and thank you for being me a cake. i thought - birthday. thank you. and thank you for being me a cake. i thought it i for being me a cake. i thought it seemed appropriate. _ for being me a cake. i thought it seemed appropriate. and - for being me a cake. i thought it seemed appropriate. and the i for being me a cake. i thought it i seemed appropriate. and the best. just to et seemed appropriate. and the best. just to get the _ seemed appropriate. and the best. just to get the excitement - seemed appropriate. and the best. just to get the excitement up. i seemed appropriate. and the best. just to get the excitement up. and | just to get the excitement up. and former labour _ just to get the excitement up. jifuc former labour adviser tom

just to get the excitement up. a"i:c former labour adviser tom hamilton. sir tom, you advise ed miliband. i sirtom, you advise ed miliband. i would start of the team then and i was pretending to be david cameron, and then later printed to be nigel farage. and then later printed to be nigel faraie. �* ., farage. i'm intrigued about the advisers have _ farage. i'm intrigued about the advisers have to _ farage. i'm intrigued about the advisers have to do _ farage. i'm intrigued about the advisers have to do that. i i farage. i'm intrigued about the advisers have to do that. i do l farage. i'm intrigued about the i advisers have to do that. i do that? i've been doing david cameron for a long time. i had a pretty good sense of what he was likely to say —— working with david cameron. you need to know what the policies are and what language they use. it's not that hard to know there is because they do it all the time. it's all that hard a job. almost you want to do an impression. did that hard a job. almost you want to do an impression.— that hard a job. almost you want to do an impression.- i i that hard a job. almost you want to do an impression.- i was . do an impression. did you? i was never an impression _ do an impression. did you? i was never an impression is. - do an impression. did you? i was never an impression is. i - do an impression. did you? i was never an impression is. i want i do an impression. did you? i was never an impression is. i want to | never an impression is. i want to iet the never an impression is. i want to get the speech — never an impression is. i want to get the speech patterns. - never an impression is. i want to get the speech patterns. a i never an impression is. i want to get the speech patterns. a bit, l never an impression is. i want to i get the speech patterns. a bit, and ou want get the speech patterns. a bit, and you want to — get the speech patterns. a bit, and you want to get _ get the speech patterns. a bit, and you want to get the _ get the speech patterns. a bit, and you want to get the attacks - get the speech patterns. a bit, and you want to get the attacks that i get the speech patterns. a bit, and you want to get the attacks that he j you want to get the attacks that he would be likely to give. one thing about that job would be likely to give. one thing about thatjob is that you have a licence to be rude to the leader's face in a way that a lot of people aren't. i guess how good i was, i don't do that any more. joe. don't do that any more. joe, is there different _

don't do that any more. joe, is there different strategy - don't do that any more. joe, is there different strategy for i don't do that any more. joe, is. there different strategy for each event and each leader, or is there just a sort of rule of thumb for everyone?— just a sort of rule of thumb for eve one? ., f , everyone? no, they're definitely the formats. everyone? no, they're definitely the formats- they _ everyone? no, they're definitely the formats. they make _ everyone? no, they're definitely the formats. they make a _ everyone? no, they're definitely the formats. they make a big _ everyone? no, they're definitely the formats. they make a big difference| formats. they make a big difference because _ formats. they make a big difference because when it's a one—on—one, you have _ because when it's a one—on—one, you have essentially one line of attack to be _ have essentially one line of attack to be aware of. you're sort of trying — to be aware of. you're sort of trying to _ to be aware of. you're sort of trying to anticipate what's the sort of crux _ trying to anticipate what's the sort of crux of— trying to anticipate what's the sort of crux of the question going to be. therefore. — of crux of the question going to be. therefore, do i address it or do im _ therefore, do i address it or do i... politicians often give an answer— i... politicians often give an answer anyway but says what they want _ answer anyway but says what they want to _ answer anyway but says what they want to say without answering. but then you're — want to say without answering. but then you're looking at what that sort of — then you're looking at what that sort of left field particularly if you're — sort of left field particularly if you're rishi sunak, what is going to come _ you're rishi sunak, what is going to come in _ you're rishi sunak, what is going to come in as— you're rishi sunak, what is going to come in as the attack. also what is the attack? — come in as the attack. also what is the attack? when you've got multiple leaders. _ the attack? when you've got multiple leaders. it's— the attack? when you've got multiple leaders, it's a different strategy because — leaders, it's a different strategy because you're looking at... you know _ because you're looking at... you know if— because you're looking at... you know if you're sitting p:m., you get all the _ know if you're sitting p:m., you get all the incoming fire and you have to decide — all the incoming fire and you have to decide which ones you want to take out— to decide which ones you want to take out and ignore them. it should have been— take out and ignore them. it should have been to war. focus on your main rivals— have been to war. focus on your main rivals without — have been to war. focus on your main rivals without it�*s have been to war. focus on your main rivals withou— rivals without it's a bit of a four dimensional _ rivals without it's a bit of a four dimensional tax _ rivals without it's a bit of a four dimensional tax game. - rivals without it's a bit of a four dimensional tax game. you'vel rivals without it's a bit of a four i dimensional tax game. you've got rivals without it's a bit of a four - dimensional tax game. you've got the person who's opposite you and you

have the moderator and she is amazing, but you have the studio audience put been quite rowdy. many of the audience watching him. there you have the media watching the whole _ you have the media watching the whole spectacle, because they were quite quickly make some sort of observation almost give a scorecard on it. _ observation almost give a scorecard on it. and _ observation almost give a scorecard on it, and that will impact on how tomorrows — on it, and that will impact on how tomorrow's papers look. so you've .ot tomorrow's papers look. so you've got that _ tomorrow's papers look. so you've got that i— tomorrow's papers look. so you've got that i mention as well because if people _ got that i mention as well because if people think, you know, if they see a _ if people think, you know, if they see a problem or they see a slight fticker— see a problem or they see a slight flicker of— see a problem or they see a slight flicker of an eye or a bit of panic, that's— flicker of an eye or a bit of panic, that's what— flicker of an eye or a bit of panic, that's what it's like, "right, we smell— that's what it's like, "right, we smell blood." that's what it's like, "right, we smell blood. '— that's what it's like, "right, we smell blood. " that means for the irinci i les smell blood. " that means for the principles come _ smell blood. " that means for the principles come as _ smell blood. " that means for the principles come as we _ smell blood. " that means for the | principles come as we sometimes smell blood. " that means for the i principles come as we sometimes call them, the cogs must be wearing i them, the cogs must be wearing 1 million them, the cogs must be wearing! million miles an hour. ibs, them, the cogs must be wearing! million miles an hour.— million miles an hour. a lot of it is prepped. _ million miles an hour. a lot of it is prepped, actually, _ million miles an hour. a lot of it is prepped, actually, and - million miles an hour. a lot of it is prepped, actually, and the i million miles an hour. a lot of it i is prepped, actually, and the reason they put so much effort into it is so they know how these things are going to go. they game it out.

whether those multiparty debates and