seven of the world's wealthiest democracies have gathered in italy for this year's annual g7 summit. the three—day meeting has so far featured talks on climate change and the middle east, plus provided billions of dollars in aid and a historic security dealfor ukraine. we have signed the strongest agreement between ukraine and the us since our independence. hello, i'm carl nasman. welcome to our special report on the g7 gathering in apulia, italy. at this year's summit the group of seven leaders have plenty on the agenda: the conflict in the middle east, migration, economic relations with china, and artificial intelligence, in talks led by pope francis. but let's start with the war in ukraine.

on thursday, leaders agreed to use the interest from frozen russian assets to raise $50 billion for kyiv�*s war effort — plus humanitarian assistance and reconstruction efforts. the g7 countries, which include the us, canada, britain, france, germany, japan and italy, are sitting on about $300 billion in seized russian assets. meanwhile, speaking in moscow, president vladimir putin on friday laid out his terms for a ceasefire. mr putin demanded ukraine withdraw from four regions of ukraine that are partially occupied by russia, and abandon efforts tojoin nato. both ukraine and the west dismissed the proposal. ukraine's president volodymyr zelensky called it an ultimatum similar to a move made by adolf hitler in the past. 0ur diplomatic correspondent james landale is following reaction and the latest from the g7 in italy. the war in ukraine is being

fought on three fronts. you have the fighting on the ground, you've got the industrial arms race to generate as much ammunition as possible, and then you've got the global diplomatic battle for international opinion. and what we've seen here at this summit is that last battle being played out between a sort of contest between the g7 leaders here and vladimir putin. the g7 leaders here at this summit have said right, we will be fully behind ukraine, we are going to try and counter the narrative that somehow the west is losing patience with ukraine. we are going to agree to use frozen russian assets to get $50 billion worth of loans to the russians, we will send more air defences, we will widen our sanctions, we will agree new defence pacts with ukraine, all about reinforcing that message. in reply to that you've got vladimir putin, the russian leader, saying "you know what, i would be willing to have a ceasefire, engage in peace talks with ukraine, just

so long as they give up huge swathes of the east of their country, and they also give up their ambition tojoin country, and they also give up their ambition to join nato". clearly that has been rejected out of hand by kyiv and the ukrainians and the west saying this is a nonstarter, this is effectively asking for ukraine to capitulate, to surrender. but what i think mr putin is really trying to do here is he is trying to divide the west and appeal to some countries, emerging economies in the global south. he is trying to appeal to those countries and say you know what, now is the time to talk about peace in ukraine, maybe that would be a good thing that might help the global economy, which has been so disrupted by this war. what the west is trying to do is push back against that, the us defence secretary said this was not being an offer being made by the russian leader in good faith, the nato leaders said this was not a peace proposal, this was not a peace proposal, this was not a peace proposal, this was a proposal for more

confrontation and more aggression. so what we are seeing played out is that battle for global opinion here, which is, in this war, often a hugely important factor in how it shapes this conflict going forward, as much as what happens on the battlefield. james landale there. and in another show of unity with ukraine, us presidentjoe biden and president zelensky signed a 10—year security agreement on thursday. here's some of what's in that deal: the us and ukraine agreed to meet within 2a hours to discuss a response to future attacks on ukraine. washington also promised to help ukraine's military with training, joint planning and cybersecurity efforts, and the us will help kyiv seek compensation for damage caused by russia. mr zelensky called the pact a "bridge" to ukraine eventuallyjoining nato. ukraine is expected to take steps toward membership at next month's nato gathering here in washington.

let's get more now on everything ukraine at the g7. with me in studio is ambassadorjohn herbst, who formerly served as us ambassador to ukraine — and saleha mohsin, a washington correspondent with bloomberg news. ambassador, the war in ukraine played a big role at this year's summit, as it did last years. what do you make of what came of it? we had a bit of a doubt, the security pact and is $50 billion loan to ukraine, how effective might these be in terms of helping ukraine in its war effort?— terms of helping ukraine in its war effort? the decision by the g7 which was _ war effort? the decision by the g7 which was a _ war effort? the decision by the g7 which was a result - war effort? the decision by the g7 which was a result of - war effort? the decision by the g7 which was a result of strong j g7 which was a result of strong american leadership, and i'm delighted to say that, was a major step forward in the war to deal with putin's aggression. the administration understood they had to unlock the potential of that $300 billion of frozen russian assets in the international

financial system, and the administration has been pushing for months. the canadians and the british were on board, but the british were on board, but the other four members of the g7 were not. the other four members of the g7 were not-— g7 were not. there was some reticence — g7 were not. there was some reticence because _ g7 were not. there was some reticence because they - g7 were not. there was some reticence because they didn't| reticence because they didn't unlock the full amount of money, this isjust the interest on the money. it’s interest on the money. it's actually — interest on the money. it's actually more _ interest on the money. it�*s actually more complicated than that. the eu had agreed that the interest on a yearly basis could go to ukraine, that would be $3 billion or $4 billion, but there was an ingenious scheme to use that interest to collateralise alone that would represent many years of interest. —— a loan. therefore this calendar year ukraine should receive $50 billion which you can use to run its economy, to deal with the massive destruction of energy infrastructure, and of course to fund the military. so this is superb leadership, an excellent result, but lost about result. —— not the best

result. about result. -- not the best result. ., ., ., result. saleha, we have heard criticism that _ result. saleha, we have heard criticism that the _ result. saleha, we have heard criticism that the us - result. saleha, we have heard criticism that the us and - result. saleha, we have heard criticism that the us and the i criticism that the us and the west have been slow to respond and give ukraine the weapons they have been asking for, what has been the reaction here for what has come out of the summit?— what has come out of the summit? ,, ., ., ., ., summit? the us and a lot of congressional— summit? the us and a lot of congressional leaders - summit? the us and a lot of. congressional leaders reflected what _ congressional leaders reflected what their electorate has been saying — what their electorate has been saying across the us, they are wondering how much longer the us needs — wondering how much longer the us needs to engage in a war that— us needs to engage in a war that is— us needs to engage in a war that is overseas while there is columns — that is overseas while there is columns at home, we are talking about— columns at home, we are talking about inflation and housing problems and they are wondering why their— problems and they are wondering why their tax money is going to ukraine — why their tax money is going to ukraine. sojoe biden had to find — ukraine. sojoe biden had to find some new fresh leveraged, realising — find some new fresh leveraged, realising aid to ukraine would be harder to get through congress, so let's get creative and as— congress, so let's get creative and as the _ congress, so let's get creative and as the ambassador mentioned, the white house came up mentioned, the white house came up with— mentioned, the white house came up with a _ mentioned, the white house came up with a fresh proposal that is creative to use russian assets _ is creative to use russian assets and be able to tell the american public and so it that we are — american public and so it that we are not— american public and so it that we are not only sending our own aid from — we are not only sending our own aid from the us but also using putin's— aid from the us but also using putin's money that we have captured _ putin's money that we have captured and that

collateralised interest, future interest — collateralised interest, future interest payments and collections on that to help fund — collections on that to help fund ukraine, so he is also makingm _ fund ukraine, so he is also making---_ fund ukraine, so he is also makinu... ,, , making... there is symbolism there. making... there is symbolism there- we _ making... there is symbolism there. we heard _ making... there is symbolism there. we heard from - making... there is symbolism | there. we heard from vladimir putin lang out his own terms of a ceasefire deal. —— laying out. there will be a peace summit this weekend which russa is not attending. but is that a serious proposal? it is not attending. but is that a serious proposal?— serious proposal? it is a serious _ serious proposal? it is a serious proposal- serious proposal? it is a serious proposal for - serious proposal? it is a serious proposal for the | serious proposalfor the submission of ukraine to the kremlin's well. it is roughly what he said when he started this invasion in 2022, the new pieces are, saying, "i, putin, will settle for crimea, and all these other four oblasts of ukraine which we annexed, even though we don't control those oblasts completely. " the"

de—nazification" of ukraine, and the militarisation of ukraine. so this is a demand for surrender, ukraine. so this is a demand forsurrender, it ukraine. so this is a demand for surrender, it shows putin's objective is clinical control of ukraine.— objective is clinical control of ukraine. saleha, us vice president — of ukraine. saleha, us vice president kamala _ of ukraine. saleha, us vice president kamala harris - of ukraine. saleha, us vice| president kamala harris will of ukraine. saleha, us vice - president kamala harris will be at the peace summit. how is this being viewed by the us, do they see there being some kind of diplomatic way forward? the us is kind _ of diplomatic way forward? the us is kind of — of diplomatic way forward? the us is kind of in _ of diplomatic way forward? the us is kind of in election mode, i'm us is kind of in election mode, i'm not— us is kind of in election mode, i'm not saying that simply because _ i'm not saying that simply because i am in washington but right— because i am in washington but right now— because i am in washington but right now the us electorate 'ust right now the us electorate just wants to know what it will be getting from this president —— president and vice president, because they are wondering whether they should pick the — wondering whether they should pick the other guy and whoever his vice — pick the other guy and whoever his vice president would be. at the same — his vice president would be. at the same time folks are talking around — the same time folks are talking around the world about american stability— around the world about american stability and instability, and one way— stability and instability, and one way to show the world and show— one way to show the world and show americans we are still in

power. — show americans we are still in power. we _ show americans we are still in power, we still have some influence, is to show we are taking — influence, is to show we are taking action when it comes to russia — taking action when it comes to russia and ukraine and meeting with putin. sol russia and ukraine and meeting with putin. so i think kamala harris — with putin. so i think kamala harris going there, building on top of— harris going there, building on top of everything joe biden help— top of everything joe biden help accomplish at the g7, shows— help accomplish at the g7, shows american influence is still— shows american influence is still important. ambassador, american _ still important. ambassador, american influence _ still important. ambassador, american influence still- american influence still important, there were six other countries also there but many them were calling this the six lame ducks plus giorgia meloni, there are a lot of leaders they're not in good shape domestically. how worried do you think president zelensky might be that if a few elections don't go his way, he might to start to lose support from the west? j might to start to lose support from the west?— from the west? i think it is hiuhl from the west? i think it is highly unlikely _ from the west? i think it is highly unlikely that - from the west? i think it is highly unlikely that as - from the west? i think it is highly unlikely that as a . highly unlikely that as a result of the elections we are going to see in europe, but there will be a minion of european support for ukraine. —— diminution. in the uk, both the labour party and the tories are all in for a bold policy of support for ukraine to defeat a

dangerous russia in ukraine. i think in france, akron, not saleha, marine le pen —— marine le pen had a good showing in the parliamentary elections but we have seen this movie once before and we know marine le pen was embarrassed by her ties to vladimir putin and russian money coming to her party. so i don't think she is in the best of shape when it comes to the final, final vote. so i think support in europe for ukraine will continue to be strong and i think there is a growing indication that even if trump were to win, support in the united states for ukraine would remain strong.— remain strong. saleha, do you auree remain strong. saleha, do you agree with _ remain strong. saleha, do you agree with that, _ remain strong. saleha, do you agree with that, do _ remain strong. saleha, do you agree with that, do you - remain strong. saleha, do you agree with that, do you think. remain strong. saleha, do you| agree with that, do you think a trump presidency would still mean pretty strong support from the us? ., . , the us? not necessarily. i think the _ the us? not necessarily. i think the battle _ the us? not necessarily. i think the battle that - the us? not necessarily. i think the battle that we i the us? not necessarily. i. think the battle that we saw the us? not necessarily. i- think the battle that we saw 6- think the battle that we saw 6— eight _ think the battle that we saw 6— eight months ago in congress to -et eight months ago in congress to get that— eight months ago in congress to get that age —— aid package through— get that age —— aid package through kind of shows the

american public is a little bit iess— american public is a little bit less interested in sending money— less interested in sending money abroad continued, continued money abroad and that is why— continued money abroad and that is why the — continued money abroad and that is why the biden white house had to— is why the biden white house had to get creative with how to -et had to get creative with how to get reconstruction money to ukraine — get reconstruction money to ukraine. it is possible trump bringing _ ukraine. it is possible trump bringing a more strong man foreign _ bringing a more strong man foreign policy would be enough to get— foreign policy would be enough to get some changes in foreign policy— to get some changes in foreign policy and relationship, he has a different relationship and view— a different relationship and view of— a different relationship and view of putin, at the same time the us— view of putin, at the same time the us did _ view of putin, at the same time the us did send a lot of money very— the us did send a lot of money very quickly right away when the invasion first happened in 2022 — the invasion first happened in 2022 and _ the invasion first happened in 2022 and americans were willing to pay— 2022 and americans were willing to pay more gas pump, when gasoline — to pay more gas pump, when gasoline prices went up because of sanctions. so there is a ceiling _ of sanctions. so there is a ceiling that already we have may— ceiling that already we have may be _ ceiling that already we have may be paid up enough, isn't there — may be paid up enough, isn't there another way to solve this? — there another way to solve this? -- _ there another way to solve this? —— are feeling. i think the — this? —— are feeling. i think the question remains open if america _ the question remains open if america has continued appetite to send — america has continued appetite to send money. the america has continued appetite to send money.— to send money. the collections

cominu to send money. the collections coming up _ to send money. the collections coming up not _ to send money. the collections coming up not only _ to send money. the collections coming up not only in - to send money. the collections coming up not only in europe i coming up not only in europe but right here in washington in november, make you so much to both of you for taking the time to be here. the war in gaza was slightly overshadowed, but it was addressed by leaders in italy. ending day two of talks, gaza's dire humanitarian situation was discussed, with leaders agreeing that the un palestinian refugee agency unrwa must be allowed to work unhindered while providing aid in gaza. president emmanuel macron announced that france, the us and israel would form a group to de—escalate rising cross—border violence between lebanese armed group hezbollah and israeli forces. meanwhile ceasefire talks are ongoing as the us makes a push for israel's proposal of a "truce" between israel and hamas. as he arrived to the g7 summit, president biden was asked about the likelihood of an agreement. president biden, did you have a

chance to discuss a possible ceasefire?— chance to discuss a possible ceasefire?- are - chance to discuss a possible ceasefire?- are you - ceasefire? yes. are you confident _ ceasefire? yes. are you confident it's _ ceasefire? yes. are you confident it's going - ceasefire? yes. are you confident it's going to i ceasefire? yes. are you | confident it's going to be ceasefire? yes. are you confident it's going to be done soon? ., �* ., ., �* soon? no, i'm not, i haven't lost hone — soon? no, i'm not, i haven't lost hope but _ soon? no, i'm not, i haven't lost hope but it's _ soon? no, i'm not, i haven't lost hope but it's going - soon? no, i'm not, i haven't lost hope but it's going to i soon? no, i'm not, i haven'tj lost hope but it's going to be difficult _ biden also said at the summit that hamas was "the biggest hang—up so far" in reaching a dealfor a ceasefire in gaza and release of hostages. us secretary of state antony blinken has recently been in the middle east to push for peace — he also said hamas was to blame for a deal not being done. the group wants a full israeli withdrawal from gaza. prime minister benjamin netanyahu says the war won't end until hamas is "fully defeated" — he has yet to formally endorse the us—backed proposal. live now tojoanne held cummings, a former middle east advisor at the us state department. great to have you here. the second day of the summit, there was some focus on gaza, were you surprised it wasn't maybe a

bigger topic or bigger point of discussion among these leaders? actually no i wasn't surprised. the focus of this was always going to be on ukraine, first it is of vital importance to members of the g7 but also it is one where they will be a greater likelihood of agreement. the gaza conflict is one where the united states and europe don't necessarily see eye to eye. they're not going to lead with that. it eye to eye. they're not going to lead with that.— to lead with that. it was interesting _ to lead with that. it was interesting to _ to lead with that. it was interesting to hear- to lead with that. it was interesting to hear that | interesting to hear that president biden had said he "wasn't confident" about prospects for a ceasefire deal. he said "it's going to be tough". are there any nations you think there that could start to take a bit more of the role and put pressure on both sides to come together and maybe agree to this proposal or something similar?— something similar? that's a very good — something similar? that's a very good point. _

something similar? that's a very good point. there - something similar? that's a very good point. there are, | something similar? that's a - very good point. there are, and have been for many years, countries in europe that have taken a stronger role in speaking family to both israel and to various palestinian bodies. the united states has tended to see its role as maintaining the security of israel and secondarily to helping israel reach some sort of peace with palestinians. palestinians have never seen the united states as being an evenhanded player. there are countries in europe that have played a different role. 0n the other hand if the united states is not on board with that movement, no european country is going to be able to effectively move things forward. that said, i think we have to recognise that within israel, the political dynamics either bolster or constrained

benjamin netanyahu, depending on what their views are of him, and whether they like it or not, hamas also has a political dynamics that affect the decisions they feel they are able to make. add onto that lab and on and you have a mix that is in no way a set of binary decisions. —— add onto that letter and on. decisions. —— add onto that letterand on. —— decisions. —— add onto that letter and on. —— lebanon. decisions. —— add onto that letterand on. —— lebanon. i letterand on. —— lebanon. i want to ask you about france trying to create a task force to de—escalate the situation on israel's northern border with hezbollah. what do you make of the proposal itself, that have a chance of avoiding a second front opening up in this conflict? i front opening up in this conflict?— front opening up in this conflict? ., ., conflict? i would say opening a second front _ conflict? i would say opening a second front in _ conflict? i would say opening a second front in lebanon - conflict? i would say opening a second front in lebanon would | second front in lebanon would be disastrous for israel, for lebanon — if we think gaza is bad, and it has been horrendous in terms of loss of life and

property, but in lebanon, lebanon as a state has been skating on the edge of collapse for a few years now. part of thatis for a few years now. part of that is its own making. however if lebanon were to fully collapse, we've got issues with syria, with turkey, with israel, that are going to impact the european countries, so it is natural that france wants to ensure that there is some sort of mechanism in southern lebanon that is going to hold off an israeli invasion. remember, israel has invaded lebanon quite a few times and also one of them moves has been in the past to strike at beirut, to strike the airport, to strike at infrastructure to penalise the government for not doing more to constrain hezbollah. so we

have got a risk to all of lebanon, we are notjust talking about hezbollah as a body itself. that said we also have the united states which has been very supportive through the years of the lebanese forces as a counterbalance to hezbollah, including in recent years ensuring that people who are in the lebanese armed forces are paid. so if there is a mechanism to involve the lebanese armed forces to strengthen them in southern lebanon as a way of saying to israel, 0k, we're going to hold off hezbollah but it is also a way of demonstrating to lebanon and to the rest of the world that the lebanese armed forces are able to play that role. that said, it could potentially put the lebanese armed forces at odds with as blah which

throws another key —— with hezbollah. on friday, israel's defence minister, yoav gallant, ruled outjoining a french—us initiative to defuse tensions with hezbollah. we don't know if that is talking for the country orjust on his behalf. joanne held cummings, thank you so much. the second day of the summit focused on migration and artificial intelligence. this year the group of seven invited the leaders of india, brazil, turkey and other non—western nations, acknowledging the shifting global landscape. there was another special guest — pope francis. during special sessions, the pontiff warned global leaders to take seriously the dangers artificial intelligence poses to humanity. while the group also agreed to launch a coalition to counter migrant smuggling. to wrap up all things day 2

of the g7 summit, i spoke to david sanger, he's the new york times white house and national security correspondent, and author of new cold wars: china's rise, russia's invasion, and america's struggle to defend the west. you talk a lot about the way the us is confronting russia and china here. in terms of russia, how effective will this really be when it comes to supporting ukraine in its effort against russia? for ukraine pre- _ effort against russia? fr?" ukraine pre— invasion $50 billion would have gone a long way. when so much of your country is destroyed it doesn't take you all that far. and the money will not simply be used to reconstruction. it will be used for weaponry. you watch, because that is the urgent need. and the overwhelming sense, at least i did yesterday, watching zelensky and president biden together, that biden wanted understandably to talk about the long—term strategic plan for ukraine, and that is what

the money was about and that is what the ten year security agreement, we will come back to that, was about. zelensky is interested in the long—term concerns of his country but certainly for the first time in 2.5 years, since the early days of the invasion, he has to worry about whether his country has a short term. it’s has a short term. it's interesting _ has a short term. it's interesting you - has a short term. it's i interesting you mention has a short term. it's interesting you mention these different timelines because they might have been a sense, i want to get your take on this, when it comes to something like a ten year security agreement which is not binding, but that is what the us agreed to, is there a sense that you got there a sense that you got there at the g7 that some of these leaders are trying to lock in some longer term support for ukraine, maybe knowing their own political timelines are getting a bit short? there is not a lot of support right now for some of these leaders. it support right now for some of these leaders.— these leaders. it is true when ou look these leaders. it is true when you look around _ these leaders. it is true when you look around the - these leaders. it is true when you look around the big - you look around the big rosewood table that they put out there it was a cast of people where the first question was, i wonder if i will see them next year when the g7 meats. the only one that i was

relatively certain about was the host, prime minister george moloney, she seems pretty secure, —— giorgia meloni. you look at the british prime minister, he is probably gone in six weeks, prime minister rishi sunak, after the elections in britain. you look at emmanuel macron of france and he has had to call snap elections, he will survive but he may not have a majority. 0laf scholz in germany, his numbers makejoe biden's look absolutely stellar these days. same thing for prime minister kushida ofjapan, where i lived for six years as a new york times correspondent, i can barely remember a prime minister that has polled as low as —— kishida. even when you wade into the text of the security agreement, it sounded a little bit better than the details are. all it requires the us to do in terms of

ukraine was to consult within 24 hours, it doesn't say anything about sending troops or arms, anything about sending troops orarms, it anything about sending troops or arms, it reinforces the number of principles and you get to the very end and there is a provision in which you can pull out within six months just with notification. that is how donald trump got out of the errani deal.— errani deal. just briefly i want to _ errani deal. just briefly i want to touch _ errani deal. just briefly i want to touch on - errani deal. just briefly i want to touch on china. | errani deal. just briefly i i want to touch on china. -- errani deal. just briefly i - want to touch on china. -- the want to touch on china. —— the errani deal. —— iran. ithink joe biden wanted to get the other nations on board with a tough economic sense against china, do you think you got what he was looking for? i what he was looking for? i think he did. when i was reading the communique it is quite tough on china, it says things the europeans would have never stood for a few years ago and there is a reason for that. something has changed in the past year since the last time the g7 met in hiroshima. what has changed is that china has

come full on of the russians in the war. they were taking a somewhat neutral position position until about a year ago, they are now shipping microelectronics, all kinds of supplies to the russians, everything except arms themselves. and along the way they are feeding the russian war machine and rebuilding the russian military. and that comes on top of all of the other things we are normally worried about, taiwan, the south china sea, the usual elements. but they are out in a big way, and the two cold war 's is all about the combination of russia and china and that is something we never had to deal with the old cold war, nixon and kissinger were trying to stop that when they did the opening to china in 1972, and we are back in it. stay with us here on bbc news.

hello. if you're not impressed with whatjune has brought us so far weather wise, i suspect this weekend will do very little to change your view. further showers in the forecast, albeit with some spells of sunshine in between. a rather cool feel for the time of year. the earlier satellite picture from friday shows clumps of shower cloud circulating around the centre of an area of low pressure. and this will be our weather maker throughout the weekend with bands of showers or longer spells of rain, albeit with some spells of sunshine in between. you can see we start saturday morning with some slices of sunshine, but some showers from the word go. some of those are going to be heavy, perhaps thundery. the showers could show up just about anywhere. some brisk winds across both the north and the south of the uk. in fact, through the english channel, we could see gusts of 40 miles per hour or more, at least where it's windy. the showers will move through pretty quickly with light winds.

parts of northern ireland, southern scotland, northern england will see slow moving showers and those temperatures at best between 13 and 17 degrees. so our low still with us through saturday night. and this little weather system here will bring a clump of heavy and persistent rain southwards across scotland, getting down into parts of northern ireland's and perhaps the far north of england by the start of sunday morning. we'll start sunday with temperatures around eight to 11 degrees. a sunshine and showers story again for most of us on sunday. but with this band of more persistent rain sinking its way down across northern ireland, affecting southwest scotland into the north of england, those showers where they do crop up across southern and eastern parts of england particularly could again be heavy and thundery. 14 degrees for stornoway, maybe 19 degrees for hull and for london. so perhaps just a little bit warmer. into monday sunshine and showers once again, although with quite a lot of cloud, i suspect across northern and western parts. 21 degrees possible across the south—east corner. and as we look further ahead, well, there are some signs that at least for a while, things might try to settle down with this ridge of high pressure just trying to topple its way in, but signs are it may not last,

it may not hold on for all that long with areas of wet weather returning by the end of the week and while temperatures may climb a little, there's certainly no heat wave on the way.

this week, lara looks at the elemental solution to cleaning up carbon emissions from aircraft. we travel to the remote faroe islands to look at the latest ways to harness tidal energy. it's sort of like kitesurfing, but on the water. if it moves, it's a controller — paul's en route towards more accessible games. if ijust raise my eyebrows, i'm making the carjump. and we look at how generative technology could revolutionise the moviegoing experience. it can make approximately 52 quintillion versions

of the film.