being very good or engineering things are whatever is not necessarily a product of a private company or government owned company runs that particular rela line. company or government owned company run justt particular rela line. company or government owned company run just functions |r rela line. company or government owned company run just functions oflela line. company or government owned company run just functions of the line. company or government owned company run just functions of the railway are just functions of the railway system. so they got to be careful not to overpromise. exactly and if ou sa not to overpromise. exactly and if you say with _ not to overpromise. exactly and if you say with that _ not to overpromise. exactly and if you say with that when _ not to overpromise. exactly and if you say with that when in - you say with that when in particular, it's going to be you say with that when in partit the, it's going to be you say with that when in partit the existing "lg to be you say with that when in partit the existing franchises run when the existing franchises run out unless the franchise hits particular trouble and ends up as happened under previous governments calling in public hands almost by accident. also this thing of setting up great british railways which they called the guiding mind for the railways look at sort of oversee everything the guiding mind for the railways look at sor1 everything everything the guiding mind for the railways look at sor1 everything being thing the guiding mind for the railways look at sor1 everything being split rather than everything being split up rather than everything being split up across different company. he inherited that for the previous government, like grant shafts on her work on that about two and government, like grant shafts on her work on that about two an| take years ago, so these things take quite a lot of time and people are expecting them bang and then actually quite a lot of stuff today inherited from the last was inherited from the last government.— was inherited from the last government. was inherited from the last covernment. �* , , government. and you can see this in 97 and 2010 — government. and you can see this in 97 and 2010 and —

government. and you can see this in 97 and 2010 and - see - government. and you can see this in 97 and 2010 and - see it nowl 97 and 2010 and you can see it now that when a party has in a long state and government, part of the process of the opposition becoming delectable again, even if they don't admit this in as many words, is excepting quite a lot of what they spent many years opposing in the intervening they have intervening period because they have to appear at reassuring people who spent years building for the other lot. see you get all sorts of that. particular examples and hear of stuff that just fell off the end of a table at the end the moment a table at the end the last moment and did have pretty widespread cross party support like the gradual band on smoking, like what's known as this law improving the on smoking, like what's known as this la venues. 'ing the it: on smoking, like what's known as this la venues. which it: on smoking, like what's known as this la venues. which is 2:2: on smoking, like what's known as this la venues. which is pretty much public venues. which is pretty much a straight cut—and—paste job, but the broader thrust of �*you the broader thrust of stuff if you say it contains all sorts of evolution as well. it is interesting when you talk about things left over from the last private government, reforming, the private renter housing market, which took the last government ages to get round to doing and still they never

finished it. iwonder round to doing and still they never finished it. i wonder if it is one of those things were 0k, finished it. i wonder if it is one of those things were ok, this on government has picked up the bat on on things like no—fault evictions. but what stopped that happening in the last government, was it lack of time? was it there being quite a few conservative backbenchers who were landlords or was itjust that it is a system that is difficult to reform and this into and this government might run into the same problems as the last one? in england, with these the same problems as the last one? in englar and ith these the same problems as the last one? in englar and exactlye the same problems as the last one? in englar and exactly that. i think reforms. and exactly that. i think there is a recognition on all sides of the political there is a recognition on all sides of 1 way )litical there is a recognition on all sides of 1 way thatal there is a recognition on all sides of 1 way that perhaps a generation the way that perhaps a generation ago talking about the rental market might have seemed like talking about a small chunk of the election, now it is a massive chunk of the election. so, there is a political incentive to be seen to get it right. and yet, �* it had been that right. and yet, if it had been that easy, with an 18 seat majority for boris truss and borisjohnson and liz truss and rishi sunak, i know that majority

shriveled, it would have happened. which does could be which does suggest it could be difficult. but we should say this over and over again because it still novel, labour got a colossal feels novel, labour got a colossal majority. so all of this stuff, where is this document they gave me? the hundred page thing?— the hundred page thing? hundreds of ”aes the hundred page thing? hundreds of “aes of the hundred page thing? hundreds of pages of stuff — the hundred page thing? hundreds of pa d0- of stuff — the hundred page thing? hundreds of pa d0- that jff — the hundred page thing? hundreds of pa d0- that is — the hundred page thing? hundreds of pa do. that is going _ the hundred page thing? hundreds of pa do. that is going to _ the hundred page thing? hundreds of pa do. that is going to happen. - the hundred page thing? hundreds of pa do. that is going to happen. it - to do. that is going to happen. it is reasonable _ to do. that is going to happen. it is reasonable to _ of| to do. that is going to happen. it i is reasonable to _ of it is reasonable to assume most of it will. some of that might decide they have not cut the wheel for her it gets taken over, have not cut the wheel for her it gt the aken over, have not cut the wheel for her it gt the way. over, have not cut the wheel for her it gt the way. but, have not cut the wheel for her it gt the way. but if they wanted this in the way. but if they wanted this stuff to happen, most of it probably will. , ., ., will. yes, gone are the day when 25 backbenchers _ will. yes, gone are the day when 25 backbenchers could _ will. yes, gone are the day when 25 backbenchers could hold _ will. yes, gone are the day when 25 backbenchers could hold the - you government hostage, can i give you an example ofjust how on it the government are? some people might say how sensitive or defensive they are. i was on the bbc news channel a couple hours ago, i are. i was on the bbc news channel a couple h in�*s ago, i are. i was on the bbc news channel a couple h in this o, i are. i was on the bbc news channel a couple h in this podcast. i was plugging in this podcast. i was chatting to matthew amroliwala and he asked what caught my eye. plans

for digital identity. buried in this and document is a bill about daytime and online services and in it is the idea of verifying your identity online, the government to sort of giving a stamp of approval to you digital id. that having an online digital id. that very quickly, i received an e—mail from the decent department saying we are not introducing digital government ids. i am sure i did not exactly say they they are exactly say they were, but they are obviously very worried that the spectre of id cards through a digital back door is being introduced.— digital back door is being introduced. �* , ., ., introduced. and it is a saw on the back of long _ introduced. and it is a saw on the back of long - labour - introduced. and it is a saw on the back of long - labour sites, i back of long time labour sites, because it is something tony blair was really keen on and ran into a lot of opposition. it is kind of a fundamental argument within politics about the back about the role of the state. back then, it was about literally a kind of card in your pocket. then, it was about literally a kind of card in yoi something equivalent in advocates of something equivalent in advocates of something equivalent in a digital era is, are we

advocates of something equivalent in a digital thats, are we advocates of something equivalent in a digital that world we advocates of something equivalent in a digital that world anyway because of towards that world anyway because of the multiple logins and ids that we need for this and that and the other? and would it not so say the advocates therefore be sensible? it still opens up those old arguments about, as critics would see it, a still opens up those old arguments about, as state, would see it, a still opens up those old arguments about, as state, and ld see it, a still opens up those old arguments about, as state, and overweening meddling state, and overweening state. hence, isuspect... the? state. hence, i suspect... what they actually say — state. hence, i suspect... what they actually say is _ state. hence, i suspect... what they actually say is happening _ state. hence, i suspect... what they actually say is happening is - state. hence, i suspect... what they actually say is happening is that - state. hence, i suspect... what they actually say is happening is that it i actually say is happening is that it is emptying up the government to login for using public services like your driving licence renewal and that, adding more bells and whistles to that and getting more into the regulation of the market where you can for verification can sign up for verification services online.— can sign up for verification services online. duck and quacks like a like a duck and quacks like a duck... �* ., ,., like a duck and quacks like a duck... �* ., i. like a duck and quacks like a duck... �* ., ,, like a duck and quacks like a duck... �* ., ., duck... and also you could imagine that is something _ duck... and also you could imagine that is something that _ duck... and also you could imagine that is something that an _ duck... and also you could imagine| that is something that an opposition party of the conservatives would get their teeth into. no amount of descent clarification from the descent department will stop them claiming... 1&5

department will stop them claiming- - -_ department will stop them claiming... as you say, the sensitivity _ claiming... as you say, the sensitivity and, _ claiming... as you say, the sensitivity and, as - claiming... as you say, the sensitivity and, as they - claiming... as you say, the j sensitivity and, as they see claiming... as you say, the i sensitivity and, as they see it, claiming... as you say, the i sensitii this nd, as they see it, claiming... as you say, the i sensitii this kind is they see it, claiming... as you say, the i sensitii this kind of they see it, claiming... as you say, the i sensitii this kind of stuff. ee it, claiming... as you say, the i sensitii this kind of stuff. and , claiming... as you say, the - sensitii this kind of stuff. and how around this kind of stuff. and how they are going to be careful around they are going to be careful around the language and defining the scope this is always quite a hard of it. this is always quite a hard auestion of it. this is always quite a hard question to _ of it. this is always quite a hard question to answer, _ of it. this is always quite a hard question to answer, but - of it. this is always quite a hard question to answer, but what i of it. this is always quite a hard l question to answer, but what was of it. this is always quite a hard - question to answer, but what was not there that caught your eye for its absence? aha, there that caught your eye for its absence? �* u, , there that caught your eye for its absence? ~ _, , ., , there that caught your eye for its absence? ~ , ., , ., absence? a couple of things, social care. absence? a couple of things, social care- there — absence? a couple of things, social care- there is— absence? a couple of things, social care. there is a _ absence? a couple of things, social care. there is a massive _ absence? a couple of things, social care. there is a massive issue - absence? a couple of things, social care. there is a massive issue that l care. there is a massive issue that the government constantly say they �*grapple �* grapple with and want to sort of grapple with and then realise it is very complicated and confusing and controversial and expensive. so where are they going to go on that? they say they want to pull together some sort of cross party thing to try to work out solution. things that are not as solution. on things that are not as hulking as fat but are nonetheless interesting, the idea of expanding votes to 16 and 17—year—olds that labour have talked about is not in plan. to all of this they say this plan. to all of this they say it is about a first session of parliament, not the whole time

between now and next general election. and then house of lords reform, yes they say they want to get rid of the remaining hereditary peers and they have this idea that peers and they have this idea that peers should retire at the end of the parliament after they have turned 18. but quite a lot of the other stuff around the house of lords, which kind of added up to a wholesale reshaping of the upper chamber, is not there either. again, as i say, they would say hang on a minute, just the start. and minute, this isjust the start. and in terms of volume of planned legislation, there is no disputing that this is pretty hulking. in all of this, whether it is the stuff around digital id or social around the digital id or social care, orall of around the digital id or social care, or all of this... around the digital id or social care, orall of this... is around the digital id or social care, or all of this... is a around the digital id or social care, orall of this... is a never underestimate politics, this underestimate this in politics, this sort of folklore memory that rattles most m ost d evoted most devoted to a around in the most devoted to a party's because, where they try to learn what they party's because, where they try to learn w of they party's because, where they try to learn w of the failure from last lessons of the failure from last time. and so, what those who cast their minds back and have minds long

enough to go back to 1997 say, their minds back and have minds long er them, > go back to 1997 say, their minds back and have minds long er them, is o back to 1997 say, their minds back and have minds long er them, is that ck to 1997 say, their minds back and have minds long er them, is that tony 1997 say, their minds back and have minds long er them, is that tony blair say, their minds back and have minds long er them, is that tony blair did. of them, is that tony blair did not use his first majority as could have done. effectively as he could have done. because a political party, a government, is rarely more powerful because a political party, a governme opening ely more powerful because a political party, a governme opening months, powerful than in its opening months, particularly with a massive majority. so you need to strike quickly. they say that doing that, given how we get all the bills and all the rest of it is, but you do wonder when you run a sort of, you try to imagine a hindsight moment looking back to �*will they looking back to now, how will they judge that given you could say, some of the other things... judge that given you could say, some of the other things. . ._ of the other things. .. before chris sat in that — of the other things. .. before chris sat in that seat _ of the other things. .. before chris sat in that seat the _ of the other things. .. before chris sat in that seat the occupant - of the other things. .. before chris sat in that seat the occupant of i of the other things. .. before chris sat in that seat the occupant of it| of the other things. .. before chris sat lucyt seat the occupant of it| of the other things. .. before chris sat lucy powell, e occupant of it| of the other things. .. before chris sat lucy powell, the :cupant of it| of the other things. .. before chris sat lucy powell, the leader of it| of the other things. .. before chris| sat lucy powell, the leader of the was lucy powell, the leader of the house of commons. she was involved in the festivities house of commons. she was involved in the festi�* bit, . house of commons. she was involved in the festi�* bit, and she will be very ceremonial bit, and she will be very involved in making all of this legislation through parliament because that is one of the roles of the leader of the house of commons. here was my conversation with her. do i call .,

do i call you madame leader? no, call me lucy- _ do i call you madame leader? no, call me lucy- it— do i call you madame leader? no, call me lucy. it is— do i call you madame leader? no, call me lucy. it is| day _ do i call you madame leader? no, call me lucy. it is| day for- call me lucy. it is a day for process — call me lucy. it is a day for process of— call me lucy. it is a day for process of titles _ call me lucy. it is a day for process of titles and - call me lucy. it is a day forl process of titles and things. call me lucy. it is a day for- process of titles and things. what was your actualjob today? leader of of commons, you have got a the house of commons, you have got a role in the constitution of the country. role in the constitution of the count . , ., , country. yes, i was in the procession. _ country. yes, i was in the procession. i— country. yes, i was in the procession. i think - country. yes, i was in the procession. ithink in representative of the comments in that procession and a hierarchy and leading _ that procession and a hierarchy and leading the — that procession and a hierarchy and leading the queen and out and all of that. obviously, the lord chancellor, the justice secretary, a very good _ chancellor, the justice secretary, a very good friend of mine, she chancellor, the justice secretary, a ver robej friend of mine, she chancellor, the justice secretary, a ver robe and and of mine, she chancellor, the justice secretary, a ver robe and holds mine, she chancellor, the justice secretary, a ver robe and holds arine, she chancellor, the justice secretary, a ver robe and holds a pouch 1e chancellor, the justice secretary, a ver robe and holds a pouch that has the robe and holds a pouch that has -ot the robe and holds a pouch that has got the _ the robe and holds a pouch that has got the speech and. and then i walk ahead _ got the speech and. and then i walk ahead of— got the speech and. and then i walk ahead of her with the speaker of the lords _ ahead of her with the speaker of the lords i_ ahead of her with the speaker of the lords i am — ahead of her with the speaker of the lords. lam not ahead of her with the speaker of the lords. i am not sure ahead of her with the speaker of the lords. lam not sure if ahead of her with the speaker of the lords. i am not sure if it is the leader— lords. i am not sure if it is the leader of— lords. i am not sure if it is the leader of the commons bit or the large _ leader of the commons bit or the large president of the council bit of my— large president of the council bit of myjob,... _ large president of the council bit of m 'ob,... , of my job,... remember when penny mordaunt, of myjob,... remember when penny mordaunt, your— of my job,... remember when penny mordaunt, your predecessor, - of my job,... remember when penny| mordaunt, your predecessor, globally famous for holding the sword as

it so, president of the council. it so, when you say about shabana being your mate, what is it like when you're there with your mates and people you have fought in the trenches with, but some of you are dressed up and the king and queen are there and there is a carriage, very formal but you are doing it with your friends? i very formal but you are doing it with your friends?— with your friends? i put a lot of work into _ with your friends? i put a lot of work into getting _ with your friends? i put a lot of work into getting us _ with your friends? i put a lot of work into getting us ready - with your friends? i put a lot of work into getting us ready for. with your friends? i put a lot of. work into getting us ready for the kings _ work into getting us ready for the kings speech. getting those bills ready. _ kings speech. getting those bills ready, agreeing get all and kind of a whole _ ready, agreeing get all and kind of a whole programme writing this speech, — a whole programme writing this speech, all of that, i have been heavily— speech, all of that, i have been heavily invested in it. and i heavily invested in it. and today i actually _ heavily invested in it. and today i actuallyjust heavily invested in it. and today i actually just wanted heavily invested in it. and today i actuallyjust wanted to enjoy it as participant and a really... a few people — participant and a really... a few people have said to me sort of smiling — people have said to me sort of smiling the whole way through, too happy _ smiling the whole way through, too happy. that i looked too happy. i was very— happy. that i looked too happy. i was very emotional about it happy. that i looked too happy. i was lovely notional about it happy. that i looked too happy. i was lovely seeing ll about it happy. that i looked too happy. i was lovely seeing myjout it happy. that i looked too happy. i was lovely seeing my good: happy. that i looked too happy. i was lovely seeing my good friend there _ was lovely seeing my good friend there as — was lovely seeing my good friend there as the bearer of the speech and the _ there as the bearer of the speech and the pouch and everything. a few whispers— and the pouch and everything. a few whispers along the way. for

and the pouch and everything. a few whispers along the way.— whispers along the way. for me the funniest bit — whispers along the way. for me the funniest bit was _ whispers along the way. for me the funniest bit was when _ whispers along the way. for me the funniest bit was when the _ whispers along the way. for me the funniest bit was when the king - funniest bit was when the king talked about the new football regulator and it cut to lisa nandi, the culture secretary, the smile on her face. the culture secretary, the smile on herface. the professionalism had taken a bit of a back seat there because she was obviouslyjust very pleased to be there, and interesting humour moment. when you say that you involved in preparing the have been involved in preparing the speech, does that mean during the election campaign you are working on this stuff? we election campaign you are working on this stuff? ~ , ., ~' election campaign you are working on this stuff? ~ , ., ~ ., this stuff? we have been working on it for months- _ this stuff? we have been working on it for months. since _ this stuff? we have been working on it for months. since january? - it for months. since january? yes. takin: it for months. since january? yes. taking our— it for months. since january? yes. taking our policies _ it for months. since january? yes. taking our policies and _ it for months. since january? yes. taking our policies and thinking i taking our policies and thinking _ would - taking our policies and thinking _ would he - taking our policies and thinking would be implemented, about how they would be implemented, so obviously, the treasury, and others, — so obviously, the treasury, and others, think about their fiscal implications, we have been thinking about— implications, we have been thinking about the _ implications, we have been thinking about the legal parliamentary legislative implications. what would a bill legislative implications. what would a hill look— legislative implications. what would a bill look like, what with the different— a bill look like, what with the different packages of things, going through— different packages of things, going through that at the time with the shadow— through that at the time with the shadow secretary of state and other teams _ shadow secretary of state and other teams and _ shadow secretary of state and other teams and trying to really make sure that we. _ teams and trying to really make sure that we, what we did not want this

king's— that we, what we did not want this king's speech to beat was either sure _ king's speech to beat was either sure and — king's speech to beat was either sure and just top line... or, just really— sure and just top line... or, just really a — sure and just top line... or, just really a short— sure and just top line... or, just really a short of a shopping list of vague _ really a short of a shopping list of vague things we would like to do. they— vague things we would like to do. they really had to meet the bar of being _ they really had to meet the bar of being a _ they really had to meet the bar of being a billand they really had to meet the bar of being a bill and a document that comes— being a bill and a document that comes with it is like 300 pages comes with it, it is like 300 pages with all— comes with it, it is like 300 pages with all the — comes with it, it is like 300 pages with all the details about each bill. with all the details about each hill that _ with all the details about each bill. that is a lot of work. normally, and government, any government at any time spends months developing _ government at any time spends months developing their next king's speech pipeline _ developing their next king's speech pipeline. our busy, we will have another— pipeline. our busy, we will have another king speech in a year or 18 months _ another king speech in a year or 18 months or— another king speech in a year or 18 months or something like that. we will go _ months or something like that. we will go through that process in government. we had to do that from opposition, _ government. we had to do that from opposition, so we did it quietly, behind — opposition, so we did it quietly, behind the scenes. and then we have had a _ behind the scenes. and then we have had a fantastic sort of support from the civil— had a fantastic sort of support from the civil service in the last week or so— the civil service in the last week or so to — the civil service in the last week or so to really then into or so to really then get that into some _ or so to really then get that into some final— or so to really then get that into some final shape. it is or so to really then get that into some final shape.— some final shape. it is a big production- _ some final shape. it is a big production. what _ some final shape. it is a big production. what bills - some final shape. it is a big production. what bills get l production. what bills get introduced to first and what is your money on passing first? is such

money on passing first? this is such a westminster pub game, it is the sort of thing we discussed at the pub after. sort of thing we discussed at the ub after. . . , sort of thing we discussed at the ub after. . .,, , sort of thing we discussed at the ub after. ., .,, , ., ., pub after. that has been one of the bi est pub after. that has been one of the biggest challenges, _ pub after. that has been one of the biggest challenges, thinking - pub after. that has been one of the biggest challenges, thinking about| biggest challenges, thinking about what we _ biggest challenges, thinking about what we could introduce early, because — what we could introduce early, because that really meant what we could introduce early, beca had hat really meant what we could introduce early, beca had tot really meant what we could introduce early, beca had to go ally meant what we could introduce early, beca had to go into meant what we could introduce early, beca had to go into that. t what we could introduce early, beca had to go into that. ahead of work had to go into that. ahead of today _ work had to go into that. ahead of today so — work had to go into that. ahead of today. so we got some bills ready. we have _ today. so we got some bills ready. we have already, once the bill in programme it then comes to a committee. and we check it is robust and good _ committee. and we check it is robust and good and that it will make good law. and good and that it will make good law we _ and good and that it will make good law. we have got high standards and expectations, we have got about legislating well. we do not want to see hundreds of amendments being laid by— see hundreds of amendments being laid by the government, we do not want _ laid by the government, we do not want to— laid by the government, we do not want to see — laid by the government, we do not want to see shoddy bills that we have _ want to see shoddy bills that we have got— want to see shoddy bills that we have got to repeal and think about again. _ have got to repeal and think about again, which we have seen a lot of that over— again, which we have seen a lot of that over the last few years. we have _ that over the last few years. we have got — that over the last few years. we have got very high expectations and standards — have got very high expectations and standards. we do have a couple of bills that _ standards. we do have a couple of bills that will be ready, and in the usual— bills that will be ready, and in the usual way— bills that will be ready, and in the usual way i— bills that will be ready, and in the usual way i will announce some of those _ usual way i will announce some of those to— usual way i will announce some of those to the house of commons tomorrow— those to the house of commons tomorrow in my first business statement.

tomorrow in my first business statement-— tomorrow in my first business statement. �* , ,, , ., , statement. 0k! business questions has not a statement. 0k! business questions has got a reputation _ statement. 0k! business questions has got a reputation here _ statement. 0k! business questions has got a reputation here as - statement. 0k! business questions has got a reputation here as beingl statement. 0k! business questions| has got a reputation here as being a bit of a knock about where you have a laugh with your opposite number, will that tradition continues or is this a more serious time? i will that tradition continues or is this a more serious time?- will that tradition continues or is this a more serious time? i took a ruite this a more serious time? i took a quite sears _ this a more serious time? i took a quite sears has — this a more serious time? i took a quite sears has the _ this a more serious time? i took a quite sears has the opposition - quite sears has the opposition person— quite sears has the opposition person to _ quite sears has the opposition person to penny mordaunt, actually. i did person to penny mordaunt, actually. i did not— person to penny mordaunt, actually. i did not do— person to penny mordaunt, actually. i did not do the kind of levity because _ i did not do the kind of levity because i_ i did not do the kind of levity because i sort of took, i can do that, _ because i sort of took, i can do that, but— because i sort of took, i can do that, but it _ because i sort of took, i can do that, but it isjust that i took the view— that, but it isjust that i took the view that— that, but it isjust that i took the view that actually we were discussing very serious issues. we were _ discussing very serious issues. we were discussing a parliament in disrepute, scandals and sleeves and a parliament that had run out of road _ a parliament that had run out of road in— a parliament that had run out of road in a — a parliament that had run out of road in a very threadbare at legislative programme and all of that _ legislative programme and all of that all— legislative programme and all of that. all of these big crisis happening in the country and ijust thought— happening in the country and ijust thought they are not really a joke, actually _ a - thought they are not really a 'oke, actuall . ., ., actually. so we might see a more serious--- — actually. so we might see a more serious... yes, _ actually. so we might see a more serious... yes, and _ actually. so we might see a more serious... yes, and there - actually. so we might see a more serious... yes, and there are - actually. so we might see a more serious... yes, and there are a i serious... yes, and there are a lot of stuff we — serious... yes, and there are a lot of stuff we are _ serious... yes, and there are a lot of stuff we are going _ serious... yes, and there are a lot of stuff we are going to _ serious... yes, and there are a lot of stuff we are going to be - serious... yes, and there are a lot of stuff we are going to be doing l of stuff we are going to be doing as you heard _ of stuff we are going to be doing as you heard in the speech day, setting up you heard in the speech day, setting up a modernisation committee to of the house _ up a modernisation committee to of the house of commons to look at standards. — the house of commons to look at standards, culture, can we look more

effectively _ standards, culture, can we look more effectively i— standards, culture, can we look more effectively. i want to take the whole — effectively. i want to take the whole house with us on some of those issues _ whole house with us on some of those issues. �* , ., ., ., , ., issues. are you going to shut down the bars? to _ issues. are you going to shut down the bars? to pick— issues. are you going to shut down the bars? to pick something - issues. are you going to shut down the bars? to pick something really| the bars? to pick something really superficial. that is my second drinking reference in one interview. there are rumours that you will shut down the bars. there are rumours that you will shut down the bars-— down the bars. that is not in the sco e, down the bars. that is not in the scope. there _ down the bars. that is not in the scope, there are _ down the bars. that is not in the scope, there are plenty - down the bars. that is not in the scope, there are plenty of - down the bars. that is not in the scope, there are plenty of other| scope, there are plenty of other things— scope, there are plenty of other things in— scope, there are plenty of other things in terms of tightening up on the standards and expectations for mps _ the standards and expectations for mps. rebuilding some of that trust in politics. — mps. rebuilding some of that trust in politics, rebuilding respect into parliament. i am going to be making sure that _ parliament. i am going to be making sure that ministers come to parliament to make their announcements first and that they are held _ announcements first and that they are held to account and scrutiny. so if are held to account and scrutiny. if someone are held to account and scrutiny. ’sr if someone goes on are held to account and scrutiny. sr if someone goes on bbc breakfast and says this is what i will announce later you will give them a ticking off? , ., , ., off? yes, and i will be 'oining forces with i off? yes, and i will be 'oining forces with the t off? yes, and i will be joining forces with the speaker - off? yes, and i will be joining forces with the speaker on i off? yes, and i will be joining i forces with the speaker on that. unless — forces with the speaker on that. unless they are immediately going to parliament to do that, but i think we saw— parliament to do that, but i think we saw many major announcements never _ we saw many major announcements never even _ we saw many major announcements never even coitiii'ig we saw many major announcements never even coming to parliament. in

the last— never even coming to parliament. in the last iteration. so, that is what the last iteration. so, that is what the expectation is of this. politicians do find it tempting to announce things when they want to, i we go on with that. will see how we go on with that. looking at the detail, that will see how we go on with that. le planning. |e detail, that will see how we go on with that. le planning. have ail, that will see how we go on with that. le planning. have you that will see how we go on with that. le planning. have you got one to planning. have you got one sentence version about what it is you are actually going to change the planning system that means more stuff gets built? i am yet to hear the simple one sentence version. , .., , , �* version. that's because it isn't, there is no _ version. that's because it isn't, there is no one _ version. that's because it isn't, there is no one i bullet. i version. that's because it isn't, i there is no one i bullet. there there is no one silver bullet. there is a range — there is no one silver bullet. there is a range of— there is no one silver bullet. there is a range of things we need to do. we are _ is a range of things we need to do. we are unashamedly need to build pro—housebuilding, we need to build more _ pro—housebuilding, we need to build more houses and homes. of all types, more _ more houses and homes. of all types, more affordable, more counsel, more homes _ more affordable, more counsel, more homes in _ more affordable, more counsel, more homes in the — more affordable, more counsel, more homes in the places that people want to live _ homes in the places that people want to live and _ homes in the places that people want to live and where they want to homes in the places that people want to need id where they want to homes in the places that people want to need to nhere they want to homes in the places that people want to need to address ey want to homes in the places that people want to need to address the vant to homes in the places that people want to need to address the housing we need to address the housing crisis _ we need to address the housing crisis but— we need to address the housing crisis. but that is not to say that what _ crisis. but that is not to say that what we — crisis. but that is not to say that what we want is �*free for what we want is a developer free for all, absolutely not. we are talking about _ all, absolutely not. we are talking about enabling faster decisions,

faster— about enabling faster decisions, faster building and regeneration about enabling faster decisions, faster ithese ; and regeneration about enabling faster decisions, faster ithese local regeneration about enabling faster decisions, faster ithese local plans. eration about enabling faster decisions, faster ithese local plans. where they around these local plans. where they are developed locally on a sort of small— are developed locally on a sort of small strategic bases, you can move faster— small strategic bases, you can move faster and _ small strategic bases, you can move faster and you can build on that. i see, _ faster and you can build on that. i see, that — faster and you can build on that. i see, that also working see, that also means working alongside new infrastructure, so where _ alongside new infrastructure, so where you — alongside new infrastructure, so where you have got new transport going _ where you have got new transport going in_ where you have got new transport going in or— where you have got new transport going in or other new infrastructure, being able to then build _ infrastructure, being able to then build homes associated with that alongside that. a more strategic approach — alongside that. a more strategic approach to it. of alongside that. a more strategic approach to it- _ approach to it. some of the headlines — approach to it. some of the headlines are _ approach to it. some of the headlines are like - approach to it. some of the j headlines are like ministers approach to it. some of the i headlines are like ministers will have more power as to overrule decisions to insist that homes or data centres or roads are built in areas where there is opposition. is that not a fair description, is it an exaggeration? i that not a fair description, is it an exaggeration?— that not a fair description, is it an exaggeration? i don't think that is a totally fair _ an exaggeration? i don't think that is a totally fair description. - an exaggeration? i don't think that is a totally fair description. we i is a totally fair description. we do want _ is a totally fair description. we do want to— is a totally fair description. we do want to see strategic plans coming, we are _ want to see strategic plans coming, we are reinstating and have taken early _ we are reinstating and have taken early steps to reinstate the housing are notjust

targets. so they are not just national— targets. so they are not just national targets, then being kind of local and _ national targets, then being kind of local and regional targets as well. so that— local and regional targets as well. so that then it means that local areas _ so that then it means that local areas have to show how they are going _ areas have to show how they are going to — areas have to show how they are going to meet those targets. is going to meet those targets. it is enabling — going to meet those targets. it is enabling that to happen faster. it is not _ enabling that to happen faster. it is not speculative, developer lead plans _ is not speculative, developer lead plans. which is how our planning system _ plans. which is how our planning system has worked to date, individual developers choosing to put in _ individual developers choosing to put in planning applications for individual speculative decisions. this is— individual speculative decisions. this is a — individual speculative decisions. this is a more strategic and sensible _ this is a more strategic and sensible and local approach. and then we — sensible and local approach. and then we will are going to then we will also, we are going to be reforming this compulsory purchase _ be reforming this compulsory purchase order element around land value _ purchase order element around land value which— purchase order element around land value which will enable local councils _ value which will enable local councils and local areas to take on town _ councils and local areas to take on town centre — councils and local areas to take on town centre regeneration and things like that— town centre regeneration and things like that in— town centre regeneration and things like that in a more holistic way than _ like that in a more holistic way than they— like that in a more holistic way than they currently are.- like that in a more holistic way than they currently are. does that include things _ than they currently are. does that include things like _ than they currently are. does that include things like not _ than they currently are. does that include things like not allowing i include things like not allowing landowners to inflate the value of their property so it is hard for local authority to off them?

absolutely, which is what are now absolutely, which is what we are now seeing, _ absolutely, which is what we are now seeing, international investors buying — seeing, international investors buying former shops and former places— buying former shops and former places in— buying former shops and former places in town centres where a lot of the _ places in town centres where a lot of the shops are closed and things like that — of the shops are closed and things like that. because if a council them, it has to wants to buy it off them, it has to pay not _ wants to buy it off them, it has to pay notjust— wants to buy it off them, it has to pay notjust the wants to buy it off them, it has to pay not just the value it wants to buy it off them, it has to pay notjust the value it is wants to buy it off them, it has to pay not just the value it is worth today, _ pay not just the value it is worth today, it — pay not just the value it is worth today, it has to pay the value it will be — today, it has to pay the value it will be worth once it has been developed and that whole area is much _ developed and that whole area is much nicer. is much nicer. which the council is also _ much nicer. which the council is also doing — much nicer. which the council is also doing the investment in. the sort of— also doing the investment in. the sort of hoped value thing. we think this will— sort of hoped value thing. we think this will free up a huge amount of opportunity for town centre regeneration and planning and building — regeneration and planning and building around infrastructure projects — building around infrastructure projects as well. a building around infrastructure projects as well.— projects as well. a few other details- -- — projects as well. a few other details... for— projects as well. a few other details... for example, i projects as well. a few other details... for example, the l projects as well. a few other i details... for example, the fair dealfor care workers. details... for example, the fair deal for care workers. which will be legislated for. some people call that collective bargaining, you see on the consonant quite a that collective bargaining, you see or people isonant quite a that collective bargaining, you see or people in ynant quite a that collective bargaining, you see or people in a ant quite a that collective bargaining, you see or people in a whole te a that collective bargaining, you see or people in a whole profession get of people in a whole profession get together and negotiate with the employers en masse. is that what is going to care workers? going to happen with care workers? will we see a special minimum wage

for everyone in the care sector as a possibly. it is long result of that? workers having the overdue. care workers having the ability— overdue. care workers having the ability to— overdue. care workers having the ability to get fair pay. that is part— ability to get fair pay. that is part of— ability to get fair pay. that is part of our package for social care, it is part _ part of our package for social care, it is part of— part of our package for social care, it is part of our employment rights package _ it is part of our employment rights package. that's detail will come shortly — package. that's detail will come shortl . �* ., ., , shortly. are there going to be government _ shortly. are there going to be government to _ shortly. are there going to be government to digital - shortly. are there going to be government to digital id i shortly. are there going to be i government to digital id cards? we government to digital id cards? this is like have ruled that out... this is like an a-level, — have ruled that out... this is like an a—level, you are asking me... welcome — an a—level, you are asking me... welcome to— an a—level, you are asking me... welcome to being leader of the house of commons! you welcome to being leader of the house of commons!— welcome to being leader of the house of commo ! ., ., welcome to being leader of the house of commo ., , ., welcome to being leader of the house of commo ., ., , ., , , tomorrow. i am not sure that is my 'ob but tomorrow. i am not sure that is my job but happy _ tomorrow. i am not sure that is my job but happy to — job but happy to contribute to our democracy. what do you say to people who look at the king's speech democracy. what do you say to people who look at the king's speeci care the stuff in there, they really care about but it is not in the speech. so i am thinking to child poverty. there is not a lot in there about improving the nhs or cutting waiting

times, for example. br; improving the nhs or cutting waiting times, for example.— times, for example. by any comparable _ times, for example. by any comparable measure, i times, for example. by any comparable measure, thisl times, for example. by anyl comparable measure, this is times, for example. by any i comparable measure, this is an incredibly— comparable measure, this is an incredibly ambitious speech incredibly ambitious king's speech programme for a new incoming government. that has not had that lead in _ government. that has not had that lead in time to do it, in terms of notjust— lead in time to do it, in terms of notjust the _ lead in time to do it, in terms of notjust the scope lead in time to do it, in terms of not just the scope and lead in time to do it, in terms of notjust the scope and number of bills, _ notjust the scope and number of bills, but— notjust the scope and number of bills, but some of big bills, but some of these are big issues — bills, but some of these are big issues that we are taking on from worker's— issues that we are taking on from worker's growth, worker's rights to planning, growth, to setting _ worker's rights to planning, growth, to setting up gb energy and unlocking all of that. national wealth— unlocking all of that. national wealth fund, house of lords reform, the list _ wealth fund, house of lords reform, the list goes on. there is a huge amount— the list goes on. there is a huge amount of— the list goes on. there is a huge amount of things in this king's speech — amount of things in this king's speech. fulfilling some of those promises — speech. fulfilling some of those promises that other people have failed _ promises that other people have failed to— promises that other people have failed to do to the victims of hillsboro, martyn's law, i failed to do to the victims of hillsb of, martyn's law, i failed to do to the victims of hillsb of some �*yn's law, i failed to do to the victims of hillsb of some of's law, i failed to do to the victims of hillsb of some of those, i failed to do to the victims of hillsb of some of those things that proud of some of those things that are in_ proud of some of those things that are in this — proud of some of those things that are in this king's speech. what i would _ are in this king's speech. what i would say— are in this king's speech. what i would say is firstly, this is a programme for our first session, not for the _ programme for our first session, not for the whole parliament, just the first session. you know the

difference what that means. one year. _ difference what that means. one year. 18 — difference what that means. one year, 18 months, possibly a longer sessioh _ year, 18 months, possibly a longer sessioh we — year, 18 months, possibly a longer session. we will have another king's speech— session. we will have another king's speech thereafter and possibly another — speech thereafter and possibly another one thereafter that. there is plenty _ another one thereafter that. there is plenty of time to do some of our other— is plenty of time to do some of our other manifesto commitments that are not in _ other manifesto commitments that are not in this— other manifesto commitments that are not in this king's speech and we will do — not in this king's speech and we will do that.— not in this king's speech and we will do that. things like votes for 1ti-year-olds? — will do that. things like votes for 16-year-olds? things _ will do that. things like votes for 16-year-olds? things i can i will do that. things like votes for 16-year-olds? things i can do i exactly. there is lots we can do that _ exactly. there is lots we can do that does — exactly. there is lots we can do that does not require legislation. health _ that does not require legislation. health care is a prime example. when you try— health care is a prime example. when you try and _ health care is a prime example. when you try and legislate around health care reforms and things, if you look back in_ care reforms and things, if you look back in history that has usually been _ back in history that has usually been pretty bad news. and quite difficult — been pretty bad news. and quite difficult and not how the outcomes that people want. getting down waiting — that people want. getting down waiting lists and increasing those appointments, 40,000 more gp appointments, 40,000 more gp appointments a our appointments a week is one of our key objectives. that does not take legislation, that takes freeing up the system, it takes reform, it takes — the system, it takes reform, it takes ensuring that we have got the

workforce _ takes ensuring that we have got the workforce in place and all of those things _ workforce in place and all of those things. there is a lot we will be doing _ things. there is a lot we will be doing alongside this, this is not 'ust doing alongside this, this is not just our— doing alongside this, this is not just our legislative programme. i would _ just our legislative programme. i would not — just our legislative programme. i would not want to put a percentage on it but _ would not want to put a percentage on it but there amount on it but there is a huge amount that happens outside of that. a that happens outside of that. procedure a can your procedure a point, can your backbenchers table amendments to the king's speech? in the next few days. for example, when people say labour will table amendments to stop arms and sailed to israel or some backbenchers think we would like to lift the two child benefit, backbenchers think we would like to lift thr be to child benefit, backbenchers think we would like to lift thr be our|ild benefit, backbenchers think we would like to lift thr be our way|enefit, backbenchers think we would like to lift thr be our way ofiefit, backbenchers think we would like to lift thr be our way of doing it. is might be our way of doing it. is that possible? or are they barking up that possible? or are they barking up the wrong tree? you that possible? or are they barking up the wrong tree?— up the wrong tree? you can lay amendments — up the wrong tree? you can lay amendments to _ up the wrong tree? you can lay amendments to the _ up the wrong tree? you can lay amendments to the king's i up the wrong tree? you can lay i amendments to the king's speech because _ amendments to the king's speech because it — amendments to the king's speech because it is so general and there are so— because it is so general and there are so many issues in does are so many issues in it, it does tend _ are so many issues in it, it does lend itself— are so many issues in it, it does lend itself to amendment. obviously, the speaker will select any amendments for voting. and that is usually— amendments for voting. and that is usually the, — amendments for voting. and that is usually the, an amendment that the opposition— usually the, an amendment that the opposition once, the official opposition once, the official opposition want to push, perhaps on

amendment the third—party, and amendment from the third—party, and possibly— amendment from the third—party, and possibly one other or so in that. but people _ possibly one other or so in that. but people can put amendments down to the _ but people can put amendments down to the king's speech. just but people can put amendments down to the king's speech.— to the king's speech. just to remember _ to the king's speech. just to remember they _ to the king's speech. just to remember they are - to the king's speech. just to - remember they are i guaranteed to remember they are not guaranteed to be selected to voted on. is there be selected to be voted on. is there anything you're particularly disappointed that you did anything you're particularly disa king'sed that you did "a ' "" ' ' anything you're particularly disa king's speech you did "a ' ' "' ' ' anything you're particularly disa king's speech thisiid "2 ' "' ' ' anything you're particularly disa king's speech this time . ' ' "' ' ' anything you're particularly disa king's speech this time around? "' ' ' this king's speech this time around? i know there will be more in this parliament, but is there anything that tonight you wish you had gotten in? i that tonight you wish you had gotten in? ., ., , that tonight you wish you had gotten in? ., .,y that tonight you wish you had gotten in? ., ., , ., in? i am really happy with what we have not in? i am really happy with what we have got knowing _ in? i am really happy with what we have got knowing that _ in? i am really happy with what we have got knowing that there i in? i am really happy with what we have got knowing that there is i in? i am really happy with what we have got knowing that there is lots of other— have got knowing that there is lots of other bills in that pipeline now already— of other bills in that pipeline now already for the next king's speech or potentially later in the session. obviously. — or potentially later in the session. obviously, there is a last line in the king's— obviously, there is a last line in the king's speech that says my government will introduce any other measures— government will introduce any other measures that it wishes or something like that, _ measures that it wishes or something like that, at— measures that it wishes or something like that, at the end. we will see where _ like that, at the end. we will see where we — like that, at the end. we will see where we get to, but if there becomes some parliamentary space available _ becomes some parliamentary space available there are a number of my colleagues — available there are a number of my colleagues absolutely ate knocking

the door down. with some really important — the door down. with some really important pieces of legislation that they want to do. which are in that pipeline — they want to do. which are in that --ieline. ., , ., _ they want to do. which are in that --ieline. ., , ., ,,_ ., they want to do. which are in that --ieline. ., , ., ,,, , ., ., pipeline. you probably would not want to _ question i pipeline. you probably would not - want to _ question because want to answer this question because conversations with the monarch are sacrosanct, but you spent more time most isps because with the king than most isps because of your various jobs. with the king than most isps because of your variousjobs. is he really into politics? can you tell if he is interested in politics? i into politics? can you tell if he is interested in politics?— into politics? can you tell if he is interested in politics? janey may but; ' ' " may but; he" may but; heirs gnaw but; heirs very anyway but, he is very across this anyway but, he is very across everything — this anyway but, he is very across everything and he is obviously acutely— everything and he is obviously acutely interested and aware of current — acutely interested and aware of current affairs and developments and things— current affairs and developments and things like _ current affairs and developments and things like that, absolutely. it has been _ things like that, absolutely. it has been such— things like that, absolutely. it has been such an honour to have got to meet him over this last week or so _ got to meet him over this last week or s0~ a_ got to meet him over this last week or so. a couple of times now. did ou aet or so. a couple of times now. did you get to _ or so. a couple of times now. d c you get to which the queen a happy birthday? i you get to which the queen a happy birthda ? ., ~ ., ., , birthday? i did not know it was her birthday? i did not know it was her birthday until _ birthday? i did not know it was her birthday until afterwards... -

birthday? i did not know it was her| birthday until afterwards... - can birthday until afterwards... she can wait another _ birthday until afterwards... she can wait another day. _ birthday until afterwards... she can wait another day. speaking - birthday until afterwards. .. she can wait another day. speaking of- birthday until afterwards... she can i wait another day. speaking of other male celebrities, jd vance, wait another day. speaking of other male ce of rities, jd vance, j”ff ' w wait another day. speaking of other male ce of pickford vance, j”ff ' w wait another day. speaking of other male ce of pickford vice :e, j”ff ' 'n wait another day. speaking of other male ce of pickford vice president, 7 'n trump's of pickford vice president, we have been talking about it a lot in our sister podcast. they unearthed this clip from a couple of weeks ago where he talks about the labour government being almost islamist, what is your reaction? well, it is totally wrong and ignorant, isn't it? but well, it is totally wrong and ignorant, isn't it?— well, it is totally wrong and ignorant, isn't it? but you will have to work _ ignorant, isn't it? but you will have to work with _ ignorant, isn't it? but you will have to work with him - ignorant, isn't it? but you will have to work with him if- ignorant, isn't it? but you will have to work with him if he i ignorant, isn't it? but you will have to work with him if he is| have to work with him if he is elected. , , ., , ., ., elected. yes, but that is not out reflection... _ elected. yes, but that is not out reflection... i— elected. yes, but that is not out reflection... i do _ elected. yes, but that is not out reflection... i do not— elected. yes, but that is not out reflection... i do not know - elected. yes, but that is not out reflection... i do not know how. elected. yes, but that is not out - reflection. .. i do not know how long reflection... i do not know how long a-o reflection... i do not know how long ago he _ reflection... i do not know how long ago he said — reflection... i do not know how long ago he said that but what has happened to donald trump, this week, is it really— happened to donald trump, this week, is it really appalling and we can dammit — is it really appalling and we can dammit completely —— we condemn it completely— dammit completely —— we condemn it completely and the prime minister spoke _ completely and the prime minister spoke to— completely and the prime minister spoke to donald trump over the weekend — spoke to donald trump over the weekend to express the country's sympathy— weekend to express the country's sympathy and good wishes. of course, what happens in another country is their democratic choice to make about_ their democratic choice to make about who — their democratic choice to make about who they want to vote in. but

obviously. _ about who they want to vote in. but obviously, people are going to make wrong _ obviously, people are going to make wrong statements about our country, then. _ wrong statements about our country, then. �* . . wrong statements about our country, then. �* ., , , ., wrong statements about our country, then. �* .,, , ., ., then. and the last question, are there enough — then. and the last question, are there enough seats _ then. and the last question, are there enough seats in _ then. and the last question, are there enough seats in the - then. and the last question, are | there enough seats in the house then. and the last question, are i there enough seats in the house of commons for all of the labour mps? no. 50 commons for all of the labour mps? no, ., ., commons for all of the labour mps? no. ., ., ,., commons for all of the labour mps? no. ., ., ., ., commons for all of the labour mps? no-l remember— commons for all of the labour mps? no.. remember the _ commons for all of the labour mps? no.. remember the figure. - commons for all of the labour mps? no. so remember the figure. there cannot remember the figure. there are never— cannot remember the figure. there are never enough seats but it is particularly acute at the moment. i thihk_ particularly acute at the moment. i think there — particularly acute at the moment. i think there are 200 seats or so on each _ think there are 200 seats or so on each side — think there are 200 seats or so on each side. so the people were fitting — each side. so the people were filling lg: sides... 30 each side. so the people were fillingsgé sides... filling up the sides... so there is not enough _ filling up the sides... so there is not enough seats _ filling up the sides... so there is not enough seats for _ filling up the sides... so there is not enough seats for the - filling up the sides... so there is| not enough seats for the number filling up the sides... so there is i not enough seats for the number of mps., let alone... that is not a not enough seats for the number of mps., let alone... t it? s not a not enough seats for the number of mps., let alone... t it? the ta not enough seats for the number of mps., let alone... t it? very good design, is it? the number of mps has — very good design, is it? the number of mps has grown _ very good design, is it? the number of mps has grown over— very good design, is it? the number of mps has grown over time, - very good design, is it? the number of mps has grown over time, it i of mps has grown over time, it has been _ of mps has grown over time, it has been around — of mps has grown over time, it has been around for a while. colleagues sitting on the side seats, up were sitting on the side seats, up the steps. — were sitting on the side seats, up the steps, some colleagues were sitting on the side seats, up the steps, some colleé sort of get up into the galleryjust sort of get a better— up into the galleryjust sort of get a better view. having all these new

mps a better view. having all these new mp5 is _ a better view. having all these new mps is absolutely intoxicating, reatty~ — mps is absolutely intoxicating, really. because there are so many of them _ really. because there are so many of them across — really. because there are so many of them across all sides of the house. and they— them across all sides of the house. and they are so thrilled to be there. — and they are so thrilled to be there, excited to be there. they have _ there, excited to be there. they have got — there, excited to be there. they have got so much they want to do in the job _ have got so much they want to do in the job and — have got so much they want to do in the job. and you cannot help to be excited _ the job. and you cannot help to be excited by— the job. and you cannot help to be excited by it whenever you go in the chamber~ _ excited by it whenever you go in the chamber. . . excited by it whenever you go in the chamber. ., , , ., ., , chamber. last question, iwas listenin: chamber. last question, iwas listening to — chamber. last question, iwas listening to another _ chamber. last question, iwas listening to another podcast i listening to another podcast presented by some very old political hands, including what of your colleagues, ed balls. they said it takes about one year for a new mp to learn the ropes. i was wondering if thatis learn the ropes. i was wondering if that is a patronising way of looking at it or does it take a good chunk of time to get good at being an mp? orcan you do of time to get good at being an mp? or can you do it straightaway? essen; or can you do it straightaway? every da is a or can you do it straightaway? every day is a school _ or can you do it straightaway? every day is a school day, _ or can you do it straightaway? every day is a school day, i _ or can you do it straightaway? every day is a school day, i would - or can you do it straightaway? every day is a school day, i would say, i day is a school day, i would say, for me _ day is a school day, i would say, for me even _ day is a school day, i would say, for me even-— day is a school day, i would say, for me even. you are running the lace! for me even. you are running the place! every _ for me even. you are running the place! every day _ for me even. you are running the place! every day you _ for me even. you are running the place! every day you find - for me even. you are running the place! every day you find all, i for me even. you are running the| place! every day you find all, that is how that _ place! every day you find all, that is how that works, _ place! every day you find all, that is how that works, that _ place! every day you find all, that is how that works, that is - place! every day you find all, that is how that works, that is where i is how that works, that is where that belongs, that is is how that works, that is where th dorelongs, that is is how that works, that is where th do forngs, that is is how that works, that is where th do for that that is is how that works, that is where th do for that procedure. i am kind

to do for that procedure. i am kind of may— to do for that procedure. i am kind of may be — to do for that procedure. i am kind of may be right in the weeds even more _ of may be right in the weeds even more so _ of may be right in the weeds even more so than newscast audience more so than a newscast audience would _ more so than a newscast audience would appreciate. and for a new mp it- be — would appreciate. and for a new mp it- be some _ would appreciate. and for a new mp it be some of the basics. but it might be some of the basics. but no, i_ it might be some of the basics. but no, ithink— it might be some of the basics. but no, i think people come in and you can hit— no, i think people come in and you can hit the — no, i think people come in and you can hit the ground running, expecting tomorrow in business questions — expecting tomorrow in business questions are number of the new mps to be asking _ questions are number of the new mps to be asking for statements and debates— to be asking for statements and debates on particular issues for them — debates on particular issues for them. and most of them are just ready— them. and most of them are just ready to — them. and most of them are just ready to get going with it. get on with the — ready to get going with it. get on with the job. there is no real training _ with the job. there is no real training in— with the job. there is no real training in thisjob, no realjob description. we all have to find our way in _ description. we all have to find our way in some — description. we all have to find our way in some regard. but i think we have _ way in some regard. but i think we have got— way in some regard. but i think we have got some fantastic new mps coming _ have got some fantastic new mps coming in — have got some fantastic new mps coming in and it is going to be great — coming in and it is going to be areat. . ~' ,, coming in and it is going to be reat. ., ~' ., coming in and it is going to be areat. ., ,, ., ., ., great. thank you for coming into our studio in such _ great. thank you for coming into our studio in such a _ great. thank you for coming into our studio in such a busy _ great. thank you for coming into our studio in such a busy day. _ great. thank you for coming into our studio in such a busy day. thank- great. thank you for coming into our studio in such a busy day. thank you for having me! we recorded even more material which we have in the podcast addition of newscast. thank you

hello, i'm christian fraser.