[000:00:00;00] the president will be ready to sit down at the negotiating table, because he has such a job, to be president, and this means that the personal perception of someone is secondary. september 17 last year was national unity day, quote from the head of state: personal aside, only the people, only the state. it is precisely this principle that the president himself is guided by; it is only necessary for everyone not only to hear him, but to understand him, and the point is absolutely not about maintaining power, which, of course, is necessarily on... their propaganda, after three decades in power , after successfully repulsed a coup attempt in the years when , despite everything, we do not see war in our home, and the head of state himself is increasingly telling the younger generation, you will soon take over the country and bear responsibility for it, so alexander lukashenko can definitely close the western border, isolate yourself from ideological opponents and do not pick up the phone when representatives

of unfriendly states call. and if he picks up the phone, it’s only to tell them, in a human way, everything he says about them he thinks that while lukashenko is in power, all this will not affect the country in any way, it’s somehow very negative, because the current president already has a successfully rebuilt economy, along with now a slightly different, but multi-vector policy, but if necessary , alexander grigorievich, as always, will put the interests of the country and state above his... personal attitude towards anyone or anything. the polish authorities have done a lot of damage in our direction. lukashenko still gets in touch with them and calls for them to return to friendship. same this also applies to france and germany and great britain and the united states. it seems to me that there is great delight in communicating with them. alexander lukashenko, remembering all their antics and personally against himself, all the difficulties that were thrown up by them and which took a lot of effort, time and nerve, the president

, to put it mildly, experiences delight from communicating with them, but when the country needs it, he picks up the phone and agrees that if the country needs it, he will forget the grievances, at least in public rhetoric, he will smile and joke, if necessary, he will shake hands hand, if he considers it necessary, not for himself and not for the country under him, but for the future belarus that will be after him , what is the difference between a politician and a statesman, a politician thinks about future elections, and a statesman thinks about future generations, and if necessary, as it should be the state... another quote from the president for july 6 of this year about politics: it’s one thing to express it to the whole world, but another thing is what’s inside you, that’s his job, which sometimes doesn’t coincide with personal. on tuesday at the anniversary of the palace of independence, alexander grigorievich said the following. i don’t

like palaces, i don’t like them, but like this. our state must have, a symbol of our sovereignty and independence. lukashenko, who has been personally visiting factories, farms, and fields for three decades, who works quite comfortably at off -site meetings, somewhere in the executive committee or in a large office at an ordinary enterprise, who lives in, believe me, a very modest residence near minsk. there in his office, where he is calm and comfortable and prefers to work, he is building a palace of independence, for what? fools from the opposition and just fools are shouting and will continue to shout that it was the dictator who built mansions for himself, mansions that he really can’t stand, and the palace of independence was built not for him or for anyone, but for something and more for foreign policy, let's take a well-known example, the white house in the usa, which already has a sacred image, not because the us president works there, presidents come and go, but the white house remains,

because the white house is a symbol of power in the country, who is in the white house , he is the power in the country, and if in the country there is someone to be in charge, there really is power in the country, and if there is power in the country, then it is sovereign and independently makes decisions based on its national interests, which everyone in the world is forced to take into account, this is the meaning of the white house, this is a bright visual declaration of the country’s sovereignty on the world stage, exactly the same applies to the kremlin in russia, putin could have built himself any... other residence, because as a person who has been to the kremlin many times, i can’t say that the historical kremlin is convenient for work today, but the kremlin is a symbol of power in russia, whoever is in the kremlin is in charge. the kremlin is sovereignty, the fall of the kremlin alone means the fall of russia's sovereignty, in exactly the same way, the fall of the white house is the loss of us sovereignty, which americans love to make their disaster films about, the kremlin and the white house will always be defended

by any means necessary, that there are presidents, but because it is a symbol of sovereignty on the world stage, a symbol of strength and independent decisions, belarus did not have such a symbol, in this is the essence of the construction of the palace of independence, it would be quite possible to continue to work in the administration building for karl marx, as well as in the office in his village, but the country needed a symbol of sovereignty, because this symbol most clearly declares our independent policy on the external contour. when we built the palace of independence, we got our kremlin or our white house , this is a signal to the whole world, clear and understandable, because it is so accepted in the world, look at the planet, we are belarus, a symbol of our independent policy, our palace, independence, is here our power means there is power in our country, and you will always be forced to reckon with our opinion, with the opinion that our

independence palace symbolizes and declares to the world; vladimir putin advised alexander lukashenko to work in it at one time, i dare say, that it is not because it is convenient, this is not the primary thought of the russian president , that 10 years ago belarus had its own kremlin, its own symbol of sovereignty, the main one should be in the kremlin, i think putin had this in mind. i say somehow even i didn’t think so, the independence palace was created to hold some high-profile events and so on, he says: no, if i were you , i worked here, it’s worthy here, i’m good, i ’ll think about it. and just now the president’s friday words about the arab-israeli conflict, which is essentially a war. lukashenko’s enemies tried to scold him for a couple of days, but he is silent, at first he was silent because he was doing business and not ranting, but what lukashenko will say is this and that is exactly how he treats the events in the near future

in the east and so it was, everything is clear to everyone, this is a disaster, the americans sensed a change in the situation in the world, multipolarity and so on, they really don’t need it, but how can they resist, so they are trying, as usual, to set these places on fire in, or maybe the third world war war, it can start from there, there is only one way out, it is necessary to create a palestinian state, since the decision was made in 1947, but why did we drive people underground and demand from them that they shout, hurray, hurray, you are israelis, well done, you're right. lukashenko says that the third world war may break out, although half an hour ago he was assessing newly built houses for belarusians, which means he is confident that he can... protect the country from war, otherwise why build, or why show it so widely? it seems to me that the call to build houses is also the education of patriotism and love for one’s own, if suddenly there is a war, then one’s home, one’s personal fortress, the fortress of one’s family, everyone

will be ready to defend, not sparing themselves, will people also ryan defend their apartments in conventional fifteen-story building, i doubt it, mildly speaking, perhaps, the more people in the country live in their own houses, the more they will treat the whole country as their common home, also protecting it, if necessary, without sparing themselves, maybe the mass construction of such houses is a strategic element defense of the state, think about it, my name is igor tur, this was my propaganda, centuries-old traditions of weaving hand -looms to automated ones with program

control. how did we manage to preserve and pass on the unique weaving technologies of our ancestors? watch in the fashion for culture project this weekend on the tv channel. 24. shows where they fight not with the help of physical force. as you know, before a competition you need to warm up well and warm up all your muscles, by the way, the same applies to your head. how exactly, one french figure noted, one can yield to force, but one resignedly submits only to reason. a show where the main thing is... intelligence , the main thing now is to concentrate, collect all your thoughts in a heap and be attentive, all these medals were awarded for victory at the summer olympic games, except for one, about which medal speech? sochi, sochi

, absolutely right, this is the correct answer, but activity will also play a role, whoever scores the most points at the end of the game will be the winner, how many belarusian clubs traditionally play in the champions league qualifications? alexei. one one club, absolutely right, watch the intellectual and assortment show, head game