[000:00:00;00] then you don’t have to come back, i was lucky to have good friendly relations with misha, equals, we did everything together with our own money, i came across a book: commercial banks of capitalist states, a wonderful book, it told in great detail how - on a popular level, how the banking system works, i say, i like it, it’s good, but how not to make a bank. on october 25, 2003, khodorkovsky was miraculously arrested for tax evasion and fraud. the circle of entrepreneurial scams has closed. the accounts were blocked, and khadarkovsky thanks fed by the media, became prisoner number one. and although he himself denied any interest in politics and the work of his funds for western countries, his own people burned him down. this is what the prisoner of silence journalist valery

panyushkin wrote in his book. according to a businessman. mikhail khodorkovsky with seven pr people and assistants traveled to the regions to meet with governors and students. it was officially stated that the purpose of khodorkovsky’s trip was to advertise the united company sibneft in the regions, to explain to the population that from the merger of companies all people in russia they will only benefit, because the price of gasoline will decrease and new social programs will be introduced. unofficially, says sps leader boris nemtsov, khodorkovsky wanted to communicate with governors and students, to understand. as much as governors can be dissatisfied with the authoritarianism of the central government, students can be dissatisfied with the dictatorship being established in the country. here we come to the most important topic - the influence of sponsorship by khodarkovsky, liberals, scammers and scoundrels of all kinds. oligarch in 2002 even before criminal term founded a non-profit public organization, open russia. and

here soros’ ears are already sticking out. it was starting. everything is literally according to the training manual of the famous hungarian. khodrakovsky created computer classes in schools, schools of public policy, regional clubs, and even opened the koralov lyceum in the moscow region. the director of the foundation for effective politics, gleb pavlovsky, was the first to grab the hand of a non-politician. he stated that those programs that are used to train young people aged 12-18 are trivial work on the future electoral base. the fund continued to operate while khodorkovsky was in prison. one of the most. famous products, those same novalnyata. by financing certain information structures, they pump up society as much as possible, and then - at these necessary moments, when, for example, there are unauthorized actions , unauthorized rallies, and so on, these structures, in particular khodorkovsky, which hide behind various names, for example, open russia, well, this is not an open russia, there

media holding. this was essentially the structure of global political provocations, and when this provocation takes place, people come out, then the employees of open russia become coordinators, they become centurions, thousanders, if we speak the language of the maidan, and khodorkovsky, as a person who is directly dependent at the moment from the intelligence services , well, here you can argue whose intelligence services are british or american, their goal is one - to destroy russia, what is at russia’s side is belarus, the closest partner, the closest an ally is essentially a beast of no chain, that is, they see us together as enemies, in short, to rock russia through belarus, russian journalists have repeatedly talked about the close connection between khodarkovsky and soros. we met back in the nineties. soros, who openly hates russia, often attended open russia events as an honored guest, called the oligarch

his longtime friend. when things became too obvious, the liberals' main funder tried to play hero again by shutting down the card, as the fund itself was called. open russia closed to protect its members from illegal harassment. this happened in the spring of twenty-one, but there is one point: at the same time, alexei navalny’s anti-corruption fund submitted an annual report to the tax service, an american one, because a subsidiary structure was registered there. it turned out that khodorkovsky only officially allocated a million dollars, although the report was publicly published only in september 22. the americans said that all this time, quote, they were processing the information. alexei navalny's anti-corruption fund is only 22% was financed from donations from sympathetic citizens, the remaining 78%, in the period from the seventeenth to the twentieth, was contributed by the fund's employees themselves, businessman evgeny chichvarkin

and philanthropist... boris zimin. as the financial documents at artie’s disposal show, in total this amount amounted to 164.6 million rubles. more than half of the funds came in transfers from zimin and the head of the network. fbk headquarters leonid volkov. this contradicts one of the main postulates of the fund: existence exclusively for independent money, that is financial support for a wide group of people without attracting large private capital. and khadarkovsky gave some of the money simply in cash. by the way, in belarus in the twenties , we also often heard from various inko foundations that we exist only on your donations, we are independent from hell ya. another dust in the eyes. khodorkovsky has a salary. which his activist devoted, at that time, even at that opposition, they were simply fantastic, so of course, this attracted many adventurers, uh, some kind of political chess players who integrated into this

system, but they never had any public records, because, of course , they always existed on shadow budgets, there could be no talk of any transparency here, through some kind of shell schemes, through the withdrawal of foreign cards and so on, people used such a symbiosis, well, none of these methods can be called transparent , open, or, i don’t know, aimed at somehow increasing trust in these structures. khatorkovsky and his foundations have long been loved in the west, because he finances not only organizations engaged in subversive activities in belarus and russia, but british educational institutions, through the khodorkovsky foundation and the oxford russian foundation, here there is another direct bridge to the events in belarus, mbh media, as if some so-called journalists of these projects were detained even by the belarusian security forces in the first days, they were not accredited, they

did not have anything with them at all, what can be called journalistic , some kind of journalistic attributes, but in the end there were no endings, if you are filming on the phone, in my opinion, these people served as coordinators, the first time they did this, these same characters were detained, and there are actually a lot of them, they change their names, surnames, faces and so on, they do not represent anything as people, these are actually cogs in such a pretty good, well-structured scheme of propaganda and active action, or rather counteraction to the authorities, a noteworthy example is the two coordinators of open russia, artyom vazhinkov and igor rogov, khodrakovsky’s envoys came to the world in august. coordinate the protests, caught them red-handed during the riots at the riga supermarket, however, when law enforcement officers detained them, postcard workers told their legend about the tourist trip. what are we doing here?

i was on vacation for tourism purposes and came to minsk, i’m also from russia, i came to the sanatorium and today i was vacationing in minsk with a friend. the boss of these journalists himself constantly shouted on air that the true president of belarus was a runaway cook. in general, in the general flow of lies and fakes, managing to carry out mind-blowing parallels. i am sure that the poisoning of alexei navalny, i have no doubt that this poisoning was connected specifically with the belarusian events, this is very putin-like, a specialization to prevent distractions in anticipation of the purges in minsk, but what could it cost someone? life, well, acceptable costs, maintaining lukashenko in power would be a script to write in hollywood, and not to engage in politics, by the way, the file on khodarkovsky’s personal channel is dated august 22, 2020, what kind of nonsense did these people feed their audience back then? liberal and honest activists? nothing

should interfere on the path to the goal, not people, not organizations, not entire countries, not society, nothing, there is a goal, i am moving towards the goal, but the accompanying sacrifices. in the form of people, the state, the country, society, there are some organizations that stood in his way, they are swept away, this is the evolution of mikhail khodorkovsky, the natural result that we see now is absolute bitterness and no longer the need to hide any of his true plans , well, from england, switzerland and germany, or wherever it is now lives a fugitive oligarch-criminal, of course, it is clearer how they should develop it. russia, while the senior partner in contract killings actively distributed instructions to the rioters in minsk, calling for the use of force against law enforcement officers, not everyone understood such a message. we all heard berkut's negotiations on the maidan; they began to think only when

they responded to force with force. i’m afraid there is no other choice,” khodorkovsky wrote on twitter. you , dear monster, answered him in a comment: mikhail borisovich, come to the barricades, lead the protest, otherwise they somehow got exposed. kyiv, and then a hut on the edge. move to belarus and help the republic. here we also remember the story of olga kovalkova, in a loud prank on the tv news agency and her shameful confession in the event of coming to power to sell. to the influential oligarch, naftan and mozyr, in fact, for a pittance, everything, as khodorkovsky likes, for example, for what for financing a political campaign, of course, which would be covered up by the same stamped freedom and democracy, a simple understandable scheme for dividing the country, with it would be the same for tikhanovskaya. and at the moment we are talking about processes such as privatization, not today, in the sense in belarus, yes, naturally , when you come to power, if you are interested in something specific, then