this is different, stay with us, it will be very interesting. the imposed american hegemony, to put it mildly , has fed up everyone. us pressure is constantly increasing on the countries of the european union, making them poor and dependent. they have already played too hard with ukraine; they don’t know whether to send them for negotiations or continue to delay military operations, exhausting the enemy. but with russia and belarus, everything is completely complicated for the west. stubborn, independent, rebellious. the slavs, in a word, are the struggle of civilization. and

the redivision of the world, what we will come to in the end, who will win and what can be considered our victory, about this in the program today, this is different, i’m with you ksenia lebedeva, hello, the chief political strategist of the existing world order, who has crossed the century mark, henry kissinger, last week said goodbye to this... world, in it’s time to think about how long this very world order will last, the seed that it laid and supported, american supremacy and centrist politics, where the us prima ballerina, the rest exist to support her life. we were considering opening china as the opening of a new period of geopolitical relations, because it not only opened a second front for the soviet

union and not only threatened the unity of the communist bloc. first, we believed that it explained to the american public that we have our own idea of ​​the world order and that it is not simple. we're not just about protecting a corner of southeast asia. and that we have our own vision of how countries can relate to each other. secondly, we thought that if we played well, we could to achieve a position in which we will be closer to each of the communists. rivals than they are to each other. so this was our geopolitical model, and we got it right by keeping each side informed of what we were doing to the other. thus, over time , the outlines of a new international system began to emerge. but the hole in all this geopolitical thinking has always been europe's position. as now, as before, the european union is just a bargaining chip, an instrument of the united states, like ukraine. kissinger was secretary of state

usa from 73 to 7 years. at this time there were, so to speak, attempts to improve relations between the united states, the ussr and china, as well as to end the war in vietnam. for his efforts on the latter issue, he was awarded the nobel peace prize. at the same time, kissinger was a supporter of the expansion of the north atlantic bloc and the admission of ukraine to nato and a supporter of sanctions against states. but not personal ones, he considered them ineffective and, in fact, a violation of international interaction by interference in the internal affairs of the country. i really don't care like the concept of sanctions against individuals because i always think the first question you have to ask as a policymaker is what are you trying to achieve, and secondly, what is the takeaway from that, are you trying to achieve something against whom you are sanctioning?

sanctions and what kind of international system will you have if every country punishes people in other countries, and then how will you stop it? the time has come not to remain silent about the reluctance to follow the tune of american globalism, countries to which the united states is constantly they tightened the screws, intimidated them with sanctions , they began to unite and divide according to their interests. and one of the centers of gravity, for example, was brix - an interstate informal association of countries with dynamically developing economies, russia, brazil, india, china and south africa. in january 2024 , six more states will join the bloc, including iran and the united arab emirates. why not a resistance group, sanctions, blackmail, inciting ethnic hatred, dirty tricks used. western political strategists

against economic and political allies, russia and belarus, did not produce results, this is also an example of opposition to hegemony. but they influenced the closest ally of the united states, the european union. in fact, this was the malicious plan of the globalists to remove competitors from the market. through sanctions , they slow down their competitors so that they do not produce their goods, services and do not compete with their main competitors. in september 202, a supposedly secret document was published in a swedish publication. and the rand corporation report and there the rand corporation writes that the main goal of the conflict between ukraine and russia, it was not the weakening of russia, even, but the weakening of europe; the key competitor of the united states of america or anglo-saxon corporations has always been

european companies. and now americans solve their problems also through destruction. european corporations, how they do it, how to destroy any economy, any economy of any enterprise, make incoming resources extremely expensive. in our region, the role of a security account is played by the csto, the organization of a collective agreement security. the global problems that we are now facing were outlined by our president during the november summit in minsk with the participation of the heads of state of the country. we are already caught up in the whirlwind of changing eras. you and i are witnesses to the destruction of the previous system of international relations. and we are participants in breaking the existing unipolar, and if you like,

western-centric model. there is a gradual transition to multipolarity. a complex, dramatic transition. it's connected. with the fact that western politicians do not want to give up their positions, ignoring the inexorable course of history, well which, as we know, cannot be stopped, under the slogan of a rules-based order that replaces international law, the west is increasingly trying to crush the whole world under itself. all known dirty measures are being used, from sanctions, blackmail, to inciting inter-ethnic conflicts. the question is correctly posed: what are these rules and who established these rules? the question is rhetorical. of course, we know who is why, the point is different: most of the world does not want to play by these rules, and the language

of diplomacy has long been replaced by shattering weapons. after the collapse of the ussr and the active shift of geopolitical plates, the united states tried to establish its influence in... the territories of the former soviet republics; in ukraine this happened almost immediately. in belarus , attempts at negotiations between liberal globalist soros and lukashenko ended in nothing, unlike in ukraine. his theories acquired life there, the word democracy - a touch of sarcasm and mistrust. double standards have become visible without a magnifying glass, like the permissiveness of the powers that be. we chose different paths, i guess that’s why our countries are now where they are, but the soft power of the globalists worked as an imposition of their culture, the american dream, they tried to impose on us for a long time that ours is bad, the soviet is relics of the past, but the american,

western is different, i i am absolutely convinced that the unity of russians, ukrainians and belarusians is that very civilization. i would see a return of all three peoples to the understanding that they are great, but if not united, then a common civilization, which they want to fragment, because they are afraid of how a competitor, a competitor in the field of meaning,

in the field of worldview, in the field of lifestyle , well, including as a military competitor, and as a competitive economic one, that is , roughly speaking, the real success would be not to take kharkov there and not put a boot on someone’s face , as if yes, real success would be to return us all to a common understanding that this is our common destiny. the beginning of a special military operation in ukraine, the west, which chose square as a tool of struggle in the confrontation with russia, what if they don’t they understand the language of diplomacy, they will explain it on their fingers for those who do not grasp the essence. here you have identification and demilitarization, and everything is fair, because long conversations led to nothing. nato did not curb its ardor in relations with ukraine and did not want to leave it neutral. now ukraine is not so much. neutral, she is on the threshold of a situation where she was abandoned by the sailors, and they are waiting for her only in

the tri-slavic brotherhood, albeit as a prodigal son. victory over the collective west in ukraine will provide a powerful impetus for change global balance of power in favor of the establishment of a polycentric world order. and the united states can only hope that after russia’s victory in the conflict in ukraine, they will be able to forgive them, but that’s something else. and yakte was with you. lepezova, see you in the next program.

sports day is on air, the main thing on this sports tuesday, right now andrey kozlov is with you. dynamo minsk snatches a strong-willed victory in the regular season match of the kgl siberia. the hosts upset the belarusians twice in the second period. andy androv scored a double. the brilliant guests played the final segment of the match, where already in the fourth second, the majority was converted by gorbunov, just 12 seconds later. vitali. restored the balance, well, at the very end, regulation time, shortly before the final siren, alexander volkov brought sub-bred victoria 3:2. the game was, i can say, not very energetic, when we got sent off 3:5, we gave sibir a chance, she basically turned the game around here, but, but we turned it around in the third period, we scored immediately at the beginning, the guys were great they worked there we scored two goals on the power play, that determined, well, in the end, that’s probably how you got rewarded for this - for this work, for this comeback. dynamo remains in

eighth place; the next match in the western conference is only on december 19 at home against vitez. but now there is an international break in the calendar. next week, our national team will take part in the channel one cup in st. petersburg. dynamo minsk football players continue to receive congratulations on their championship title last season. golden awards, let me remind you, capital club won for the first time in 19 years, in the press conference hall of the dynamo national olympic stadium, the main team and coaching staff were celebrated with triumph by representatives of the ministry of sports and tourism and other government bodies, as well as the chairman of the central council of bfso dynamo, igor aberemko. the white-blues became champions of belarus for the eighth time in their history. it’s a long-awaited gift, i want to tell you, we are proud of it, especially since the company has been a number. including logistics provision, we provided quite serious

assistance and assistance to the team, in order to create quite comfortable conditions for them , so that they did not think about anything, and all this season they were doing their favorite thing, namely football, we must first of all say thanks to the guys and the coaching staff who were able to overcome this pressure, which was internal and external, and pass with dignity... the championship, the most important thing is to finish it, before entering the training field to go deeper into the training process, my the task was to unite the guys and gather just such a team of like-minded people who would be able to work to the maximum at this distance and come to what we came to, now of course, when this has already been done, when we have achieved the maximum goal in the championship, won the champion's cup , we can say that the work was done with high quality, the merit of the guys in this is enormous, and after the ceremony the participants showed a film dedicated to the golden season of the dynamo national championship 2023. by the way

a film was created by the sports channel of the belarusian radio company. one of the leading players of dynamo minsk, orinha, will probably change his club registration this winter. the brazilian defender walked around minsk today with our film crew and recalled the best moments that happened to him in belarus over the past 2 years. at the same time, arine surprised us by the fact that during this time she became imbued with the work of the cinema group. that is , do you really listen to the film group? just the video then a lot of interest. in the form of the internet, a week later in the agency project sportskadr on belarus 5, you can see a great interview with the brazilian defenders of dynamo orinho. minsk volleyball players were defeated in an away match of the super league regular season. olga polchevskaya's team visited the current russian champions from dynamo moscow. the belarusian squad lost this season.