only in ukraine itself, but also in the united states of america, and it is not a fact, for example, that the weapons that on paper reached kiev did not end up, for example, in the gas sector not through the fault of kiev, but through the fault of the united states america, after all, any war , any military action is the easiest way to earn extra money, no one will go to the front to check which machine guns, which bullets and shells, who is firing at whom.

on the one hand, it is obvious that the israeli army slept through this attack, and in general the footage that is shown to us when in reality israeli army soldiers are taken by surprise at fortified bases ; to put it mildly, they only have time to put on bulletproof vests, or at best, t-shirts, and practically do not offer resistance; they are destroyed, literally, which suggests that, in principle, it was sudden. obviously, many

experts say that it could not have happened without betrayal or without some, well, to put it mildly, moves from...

china, india, iran, the same thing, and for iran, which wants to demonstrate, firstly, wants to take revenge for what's in last year they did something to him, it’s clear what the special services did, some drones, mass poisonings in schools, attempts to undermine society on ethnic grounds, on gender grounds, this is discontent.

such a multi -layered pie, well, look, if this linkage with the united states and ukraine completes in our conversation, yes, the united states is obviously losing the role of such a global hegemon, it is losing, yes, but at the same time they really want to preserve it, they continue to throw away billions, at least in words, yes, at the same time, the draft american budget without assistance to ukraine, well, at least in that the volume in which ukraine would like, and this was very surprising. well, or at least alerted not only zelensky, but even barel. in your opinion, what kind of bargaining is biden conducting regarding ukraine? is it only connected with this 30% that they actually lost in a year and a half? well, if we

take 10% there, the number of people willing to help ukraine decreases every six months. is this only related to this? here, in my opinion, an important role is played by...

moving your production from europe to the united states of america, according to according to german social studies, which were carried out just a year ago, then, a year ago, 25% of large companies in germany were already withdrawing their enterprises from the territory of the european union, and 51 were thinking about it and planning to do so.

economic, financial, technological , to use those intellectual resources of europe to strengthen the united states in the most powerful, most powerful struggle with china, that is , to concentrate the resources of europe at home, take them to ourselves, turn europe into a mere periphery.

the cdu, csu and sdp together scored about 50% votes. why were they called folk? they always together gained at least a constitutional majority. that is, there is no trust in the systemic political forces, in the social institutions that exist.

interested, but there is another trend , you noticed about slovakia, and these are only the first elections, and i want to emphasize the curious point that such a special opinion exists and prevails in the societies of the former austria-hungary, yeah, hungary has been very was critical of this whole ukrainian topic, we see a sharp change of opinion in slovakia. and soon there will be a czech republic, soon there will be austria, initially

it went on quite restrainedly, it went on quite restrainedly, now there will be even more criticism and gradually a pragmatic core will be built within the european union that understands that we are losing funds, we are losing our subjectivity because of that some part of the european bureaucracy benefits. yes, he pushes this problem exclusively onto europe. how long will europe deal with the problem of ukraine, even taking into account, as you said, the need the presence of a common enemy as a means to escape from one’s own social cataclysms. well, this is a rather idealistic option; i think the united states will not

completely merge ukraine. however, their main task is a war of attrition. taxpayers, plus we must not forget such a monster as the eastern partnership and other types of association with the eu, by and large the system of financial and economic colonization of other states by the european union, this is what this is north africa, these are some latin countries america, this is the same moldova, georgia,

azerbaijan, that is, there is enough. a difficult question, this must be considered, but i think that they are ready to play until 2028, exactly, why on the twenty- eighth, because there will be the next elections in the united states, a good answer. when we talk about europe’s readiness to continue working to exhaust russia, this automatically implies that belarus is working in conjunction with russia, they will work against us, naturally. and here is the president’s visit to a fortified area, one of them, and a conversation on a number of important topics. we have long been accustomed

that our first he not only understands and is well versed in the internal external agenda, right? we often see that his words are prophetic in nature, and the president’s warning, especially addressed to our ardent western partners, yes, we should listen, and listen literally, so let’s start with the obvious, here is the situation around the borders, yes, we learned the lessons of history, lessons of modern warfare, this was discussed, we are ready to cause unacceptable damage in the event of an attack. this is what is behind this once again for our viewers in simple words? the fact that we will never give up our inheritance, will we give it to anyone? this is the first point, the second point is that our state is following the path of dialogue, not monologue, so

let’s remember with the same poles, yes, when we proposed to conduct joint exercises. high-ranking official of the ministry uh-huh, and how they fidgeted, and then suddenly two defense signed their resignations, yes, here we must realize at some point that the modern militaristic bacchanalia of poland, it has two, two components, the first component is the pre-election one, the image of the enemy.

which does not exist, probably , nowhere else, when the party first took over the main economic, production , industrial concerns, that is, it is the party, not the government, the party, it is pis that puts its people on the board of directors of orlin, on the board of directors of the navozy group , kghm, copper are the largest concerns, leading strategic concerns in poland. this is the first moment, now they are doing this already in the army and using the army for their political purposes, we are in this situation, when the president says: we are ready for dialogue, we...

their tactics towards us, instead of establishing offensive contingents on the borders, they

actually began to mine the suwalki corridor, that is, the logic of the maginot line, a defensive presence , that is, a sharp change in tactics and strategy, it is clear that this is all being done from a political technology point of view, it seems to me a demonstration, yes a demonstration, but on the other hand the poles. the americans also have an ambivalent attitude towards this; there is a polish lobby, it quite strong, which really promotes militarization, the sale

of weapons, but the sale of weapons is one thing, and the management of the american contingent in europe, which the poles want to facilitate their deployment on the territory of their state, they are failing in this, the americans are in charge. the complaint here is why do we need to transfer the entire infrastructure from germany to poland when it has already been built since the cold war, there are nuclear weapons there, the second point is that the americans do not have a certain trust in that, that poland is a predicted state, an example is the same grain conflict with ukraine, yeah. after all, this embargo was not introduced on september 15 or in the summer, it was introduced back in march of this year, but for some reason no one

talked about this topic informationally, but in july everyone knew that this agricultural coalition, which warsaw built against the kiev regime, and their grain that they will prolong.

help is about to disappear from under our feet, well, it’s already decreasing, they are already saying directly that decreases, and the most important influence, the pressure on public opinion in the west, which zelensky was so concerned about, also goes away, because they are dissatisfied with him in the west, and he begins a new round of hysteria, look, the poles are a traitor, this is a ukrainian case, it’s clear what in poland, ratings of the law and

justice party.

ukrainian themes, hysteria, shows that look, yes, maybe we didn’t really notice the seventieth anniversary of the volyn massacre and swallowed it, but now we’ll show them, we’ll firmly defend our polish there national interests, okay, then it’s a provocative question, it’s simple, yes, then why should doody declare against the backdrop of the events that began in israel, yes, that, like, there’s no need to over-exaggerate the significance of the arab-israeli conflict, yes, that is, it has always been there , yes? it has always been here, here, after all, there is still ukraine, well, let ’s just say for a politician of this level, a week before the elections, such a statement, where peace’s positions are already weak, yes, but it looks a little strange or illogical, or whatever- there is logic somewhere, here is simple logic, dudo does not want to lose the infrastructure and the role assigned to poland in supporting the kiev regime, primarily as a military

infrastructure.

three basic scenarios: the first scenario is understandable, this is if peace remains in power, either independently or in a coalition takes someone. in this scenario, after the parliamentary and presidential elections, the rhetoric will become a little softer. and the second point, i think that then there will be some cutting off, at least in the chinese direction, which means that they will border won't close. yes.

poland itself or the european union is not there, what is important here? what is important is that, on the one hand, there will be some demilitarization of the region, many rearmament projects will be frozen or reduced, but on the other hand, poland will be more disciplined within the framework of this euro-atlantic solidarity. yes, berlin will be watching the americans.

will come to the polling stations, everyone else will follow the residual principle, that is , the church, which is financed by the state, including, and pay salaries priests of the state, he will also play his role in this, of course, calling on them to come and vote, of course, but i still, as a person who understands the other side of the coin of the polish people, at least that they are slavs, that they anglo-saxon spirit of chusht.

yes, but they have a certain significance ; they influence, let’s say, the situation both in belarus and, first of all, on society, the so-called fugitives who fled to poland as well. i would like to ask you to briefly comment on this hysteria and panic sentiments, this is literally, judging by social networks, yes, which arose against the backdrop of the presidential decree. about changing the algorithm for issuing belarusian passports,

and naturally, against this background, the initiative that appeared among those on the run with the creation of a new belarusian passport, let’s speak frankly, based on social networks, direct statements from those who are there, this situation has aggravated, and panic sentiments , about which both depression and fatal distrust of tikhonovskaya, in your opinion? name this project also printed my own

passports, distributed these passports, but no one ever recognized these passports, and those who fit into the bnr project, they turned out to be either stateless or without documents, this story takes place, the project that tikhanovskaya is now demonstrating, well this is a project of these...

everyone is the principle of legal inevitability of punishment for some kind of violation, this is, if, okay, there is a person... could retreat, the offense is not too serious, or such an average one, yes, but that happens tikhanovskaya herself knows what offense she committed , better than anyone, it is clear that someone there will give her citizenship of some small state there, yes, but others are not

tikhanovskaya, others are not on grants, others came and ended up with the broken one..

... in some ninety years there he resumed the presidency in exile, he was also a fugitive , no one will remember him today, he is a political corpse, now we see how this whole fugitive machine is gradually disintegrating, like this very political corpse, but he is still on

artificial respiration, yes, he is connected some devices in the form of grants, in the form of some... information resources in the form of houses there in warsaw, vilnius, but sooner or later the organs will begin to completely fail, the decomposition of the body will begin, towards this decomposition day by day we are becoming more and more we are approaching, after the elections of 24 and 25 their meaning even for... the west itself will become zero, and they know this very well, they can today declare about passports, about some other documents, about some plans, how many whatever, but they are now for the west are uninteresting, their interest is recruiting some terrorist organizations and nothing

more, but being cannon fodder, i don’t think that’s what they want, no, they definitely don’t want that. when you see that the same failed president is accused, well, in fact, that she is to blame for the fact that such a decree appeared, yes, the fate of the fugitives themselves has become even worse, this accusation against her does not even surprise me, in fact, this is a natural sequence. peter, unfortunately, for me, unfortunately, is extreme, near-philosophical traditional question, i’ll take him away with our closest ones.

that is, understanding what they do, understanding what they are doing, and moreover, understanding the industries

that need to implement these legal acts, therefore, who exactly should come to us in our authorities are those who have the competence, these are firstly, and secondly, those who have experience. uh, simple empty talkers, if we remember the early nineties, everyone started studying to be political scientists, because they thought that if you studied to be a political scientist, you would become a politician, like that there shouldn’t be faces, why? because the main disease of these pseudo-democratic parliaments is, yes, there is a lot of circus, but very little sense and... our parliament should always be different in that we have a lot of sense and there is no circus, we

have a belarusian state circus that does its own thing as a matter of fact, those who mind their own business should sit in parliament, and this is a fundamental difference, we saw in our southern neighbor, we saw in some other states, when people are not in their own way.

small, not a hegemon, without colonies, we count every penny we earn with our own labor and want our deputies to be the same hard- working people as we ourselves.