in each set, but they couldn’t snatch victoria in at least one game, the result is 3:0 in favor of the guests, the capital’s have not seen victories in nine matches in a row, we are leading by such points, we are losing the initiative, some weakening is happening, we relax everything , the most annoying thing is that you give yourself completely to the fillings , here i am, all girls, well, unfortunately, it’s not working out yet, here we are, but we ’re trying very hard, of course, we girls with character are not going to give up. at the moment , the minsk resident ranks penultimate thirteenth line on the summary report card, the squad will play their next match away from dynamo krasnodar on january 20.

minsk in the fifties and sixties. he was changing rapidly. in those years it was also called the fastest growing city in the soviet union. entire districts with residential buildings and new streets grew around the center.

minimalism in everything, it turns out, there is perestroika in the country, no, not the one that happened in the eighties, perestroika was then announced by nikita sergeevich khrushchev in construction and architecture. at the beginning of january 1958. v veskulyakh in belovezhskaya pushcha were waiting for the first secretary of the cpsu central committee nikita sergeevich khrushchev. the belarusian leadership had to report on the fulfillment of its instructions, given a year earlier in 1957. then the task was set, in the shortest possible time, in a protected area, to build a government residence where it would be possible to receive high-level guests. and paahotsizza, it

was still a state dacha in the gpu, a melovezh poshcha, and so in the project assignment, but she always obeyed. first to moscow, that is , it was khrushchov’s union dacha, he didn’t even know that there is such a beloyevskaya pushcha, when khrushchov was in yugoslavia, joseph bros sito began asking him about the beloevskaya pushcha, it was once famous for the king, khrushchov returned, apparently gathered people, said: “we need to resume this whole thing,” they started right away in 57 build. true, at first the construction of cottages was not

envisaged; the best forces were thrown into the construction of the facility, construction was carried out at an accelerated pace, and viskuli was chosen as the location. 1958, khrushchev was greeted with belarusian hospitality and the distinguished guest was in the mood also good, but unexpectedly for everyone

a serious scandal broke out. khrushchev, when he saw the two-story building, attacked the management and the builders with reproaches. i have such palaces in moscow, i need wooden ones, hunting ones, but no matter how much i like the building, it is truly unique in its architectural design, there is a daylight lantern at the top, the heating system provides light at any time of the day, the building itself is austere, simple it seems like this, but again .

for me viskuli is interesting from the point of view combining the forest, the landscape and this architecture, still pompous, this approach is also amazing, to create an atmosphere of solemnity and - not in the center, not in cities, not in squares, not on the streets, in the forest, in general, in natural landscape. the viskuli residence became a place for receiving distinguished guests for many years, a unique object in the very heart of the belovezhskaya pushchina.

the main building was inhabited by foreigners. the kuban players were more or less successful, they never missed a mark, but the guard had some mistakes. the beginning of the decline of the time to create unique, buildings, expressive and unique in their architectural design, were initiated by

the devastating all-union meeting that took place in the kremlin on december 7, 1954, where nikita attended. wastefulness and excess in the decoration of buildings, khrushchev openly called them a

stumbling block on the path of industrialization of construction, the course that was taken in the ussr. at the beginning of 1955, the belgosproject institute discussed the resolution of the party central committee on eliminating excesses in design and construction. it was difficult to call it stormy. based on mordvinov’s report, president of the ussr academy of architecture. many were confused and bewildered. everyone

saw that the country's chief architect did not agree with the construction of faceless buildings, but now mardvinov repented, admitted the mistakes of the architects, and he himself accused them of excess and wastefulness. those present voted unanimously to approve the provisions of the resolution. the meeting was left. in deep silence, in belarus they did not risk getting carried away with excesses, but also switched to the construction of faceless buildings, abandoning what was set by the main avenue capital of the neoclassical style, were in no hurry. yaakuba wheels square is so iconic , we still see the architecture of residential

buildings, and the factory building, which is located a little bit away from the central, central avenue, they retain the architecture of the fifties, it has lost a little of its pomp. but still, it still contains the classics, and a whole palette of unique architectural solutions, newly erected buildings, where the style combines the seemingly incompatible, a philharmonic building appears, a modernist the development of architecture, the portico6 columns, modern, brutal flutes on the surface,

the principles of stalinist neoclassicism, where the order program is being implemented, but at the same time it has already been reduced to some kind of minimal clarity and rigor. a sufficient number of buildings of the so-called transitional period are appearing in minsk, but they are no less interesting, original, and have preserved for us the features of the architectural trends of the fifties and seventies. more transitional works, or something - this is, of course, telegraph

abram dukhan, the telegraph office, which is located on october square, please do not confuse it with the main post office. the telegraph already contains a lot of what determined the further appearance of modernism in minsk. a fairly flat solution for the façade, although with very elegantly designed planes. lack of pronounced

in the early sixties, in the country's cinemas, before the start of showing films , they showed, as they would say today, an advertising video, he talked about the advantages of new residential buildings and, of course, apartments. in people immediately dubbed them khrushchevkas. was to some extent progressive, it made it possible to resettle people, these buildings were never intended to last forever, they were considered as temporary objects, by the way, also a very modernist principle of the designer’s house, khruchyovka - this is not only a soviet invention, if you look at houses for workers, bruno tauto around berlin and other examples of left-wing architecture of the twenties and thirties, we will see this type of

very economical housing, in the fight against excesses... abandoned not only architectural delights, but also from the previous sizes of apartments. now the living area of ​​a two-room apartment is on average 22 m2, the bedroom is 6 or 8 m2, the living room is 14 m2. the film especially advertised kitchens, or rather their advantages, which were seen in size, only 4.5 square meters. before, to cook borscht. - the announcer said, the hostess was forced to run around the kitchen up to 50 m, and now you can reach everything with your hand without leaving your seat. the construction of such standard apartments in the ussr in the republic became widespread. the specificity of the situation in the soviet union was that it was very

economic housing became a government program. and indeed, there were choruses. a huge country was built, indeed, this led to a certain architectural monotony, uniformity, and some boredom. the industrial approach and new trends in architecture were reflected in public buildings, cultural objects, hospitals, and sports facilities. belarusian architects faced very difficult tasks to maintain a balance between styles. and not turn the city into a faceless one with monotonous buildings. a unique phenomenon was the emergence of fundamentally new approaches to organizing the urban environment. thoughtful , very well built interior layouts while being economical. an example of the ensemble of verkhoruzhiy streets to olga borisovna vladyn.

these are many objects, even these objects are from a later period. entry zone to minsk. it is a powerful rhythm that literally permeates the movement. nevertheless , modernism began to dominate in architecture. this style becomes the only official one in the urban planning of the ussr. some may compare it with constructivism, where everything is also no frills.

one of the interesting solutions was the sports palace of the architects filimonov and malyshev, built in the sixties. the main thing in this palace. sport was the creation of a huge transforming internal space, this was done precisely thanks to new technology, these are cable-stayed structures that

made it possible to block this huge span, the use of very powerful elements and a concrete structure , as if a support, well, this is an excellent engineering calculation, that is, huge building with huge a flyover for that time... this is a big breakthrough. decades later, the sports palace building remains original today. without it, it is difficult to imagine a modern prospect of winners. but the desire for novelty did not always have a positive effect on the historical appearance of cities and the capital. there is sometimes a fashion for large-scale multifunctional objects. ended sadly for the historical building.

in may 1962, at a meeting with the first secretary of the central committee of the communist party of belarus in mazurovo , the discussion of the project for a concert film was ending. sports. according to the documents, the sports palace was held under this name. overall i liked it, it was original and large-scale. the decision to begin its construction has been agreed upon. it was a great success for the young architect sergei filimonov. he is only 25 and has such trust. unexpectedly, he asked to speak, turning to mazarov. can you tell me? everyone expected gratitude to the belarusian leadership for the trust shown, but filimonov spoke very emotionally

about something completely different. a few words about the red church. the church, of course, is not a monument architecture, but since it survived the fighting, it will definitely become one. it is beautiful in itself; the bricks for its construction were brought from poland itself. there is no need to tear it down. unfortunately, the course towards modernist environmental regeneration had its consequences. an example of such a modernist regeneration of the environment was, for example, nemiga. nemiga turned out to be a victim. the idea of ​​creating such a comfortable modernist city, and we can say that this is not the first time in the history of world architecture,

unfortunately, we must remember how the victorian era london was destroyed. although nemiga suffered, something was saved. thanks to a balanced approach, we have a home today. we have interesting, original buildings from previous eras, modern new objects, the so-called glass architecture. they were born at the junction of eras. in the sixties, minsk found its new face. there is an openness that was not there.

the appearance of the belarusian capital of the sixties is a time of expressive objects of that time. we see it today and it is the result of a mixture of styles. minsk at this time became an arena the activities of outstanding architects, in this sense, the 60-70s brought a completely

new flavor. the image of minsk, the coloring of such a bright expressive modernism , not just single objects of new ensembles , this long period, the thirties , forties, fifties, sixties, seventies, formed an exceptional variety of architecture, which in general allows us today to think about, well, let’s say, further steps. minsk is such a library of styles. architects, if you treat with interest at the same time critically, you can come to minsk, study the history of the development of society and architecture.

100 brave children gathered in our studio, each of them has a question for an adult, why do you think children ask strange questions, a person is always scared by something new, what scares him? you, when you were offered to become the rector of bsu, something you could never forgive, well, for example, a loved one, as it is written in the gospel, if you forgive and forgive people for their sins, then the heavenly father will forgive you, that’s it, to the heroes of the program have to open up to viewers, the main task is to honestly answer all the original, and sometimes uncomfortable

questions, what does bsu have that no other university has? very good question. the flaps are flying upward, there is magic light everywhere. in your time, in such an interesting, modern time, the music that you listen to, the music that you like, probably should sound like it. see the project 100 questions for adults. on the belarus 24 tv channel. we do not have the moral right to live only for ourselves, we must look beyond the horizon, to another home we have not and will not have one. african countries, as well as the arab world, latin america and asia, why are they ready and willing to work with belarus, because the leaders of these countries have deep respect not only for belarus as

a country, but also personal respect for alexander lukashenko. belarus forced nato to hear itself as an instrument that is very clear to this north atlantic aggressor. reproaches about the deployment of russian tactical nuclear weapons in our country are absurd. we're just learning diplomacy the so-called etiquette of those who made the language of power a global trend. we have a new political line for the first campaign in parliament.