ned, dozens of flights were cancelled, a number of sections on expressways were still partially closed, and there were interruptions and delays in the movement of electric trains. an international competition among special forces continues in dubai. today is the fourth day of the competition. according to the plan, all teams will have to undergo a test called tower assault. in addition to agility, strength, coordination and accuracy, participants will demonstrate their mountaineering skills. the men's team was the first to enter the distance. the ministry of internal affairs team, our women's team will perform today team. my colleagues will have more information at 15:00. with this i say goodbye to you, all the best.

hello, we welcome everyone who is with us now, i am very pleased to introduce the first guest, who, of course, does not need long introductions, historian, writer, brilliant lecturer andrei fursov, connections with the studio, andrei ilyevich, hello, thank you for being with us , hello, well, there are really a lot of topics, and to start, i propose the one in which the semantic lines of different events converge, these are the elections in the usa. watching their electoral campaign, it is impossible not to notice that this time it is not just a traditional competition between democrats and republicans, but a truly serious battle, here is the situation around texas, an interesting moment was in new hampshire, when one of the most prominent candidates vive komaswami announced that he was joining trump's team, and then he said: we are in the midst of...

a war in this country, this is not a war between blacks and whites, this is not a war between democrats and republicans, this is a war between the state and the citizen , well in in this case, of course, i am in no way trying to romanticize trump, but the intensity of the confrontation makes me wonder if this is not the beginning of the end of america, at least in the form in which we knew it up to this point? well, i think that the beginning of the end of america as we knew it was the arrival of trump. but you are absolutely right that what is flaring up now in america is not so much an intra-american fight at all, it’s just in america, as on the central platform, a fight of completely different world forces, and first of all, this is a fight between the 1% of the world's top and approximately 10-12% of the world 's middle class, and since the top and the world's middle... eye are mostly

concentrated in the usa, then the usa turned out to be the platform on which this takes place a fight, but it has a lot of different dimensions, that’s why it’s so sharp, well , for example, in addition to the fight between the 1% and the 10-12% of the middle layer, this is a fight within the 1%, between industrial capital on the one hand and financial capital and the corporate world, the other is the fight of what's left of state-monopoly capital, from what trump calls great america, this is the america of the thirties- eighties, and new it, financialist structures. if we narrow the situation down and look at the united states, this is a battle between the elites of the west coast and the east, that is, the coastal elites and the elites of the hinterland. tx oklahoma,

that is to say, where the republicans are, those states that the republicans control, this conflict has a racial conflict, because behind trump, behind those forces that support him, their supports the white middle class and part of the whites, the white elite, while the majority of the black population and latino support the democrats, which is why it is so important for biden to drag them in. as many democrats as possible, as many migrants to the united states as possible, these are potential votes, that is, this is a very, very complex conflict that has an intra-american, global dimension, and i think what awaits us in the middle of summer and at the very beginning of autumn , very, very hot events await in the united states, this will not be resolved so easily. trumpists. not this time

they will make the mistake they made when trump was overthrown with a coup d'etat, essentially throwing him out of the white house, and now they know that this is possible and... they will not repeat the mistakes, it will not come to a civil war there with such at a pace? well, i think that at this stage, not yet, because there is social fat in society, while there is something to divide in society, this is just a civil conflict, but this does not exclude that in the future this will happen, by the way, 20 years ago a man named chitom...

we’re putting the dots in place, of course, the current situation in the middle east, and as an example, i would not even give the current aggravation with iran, i hope we’ll talk about this later, here’s biden’s nervousness during a telephone conversation with netanyahu, remember, which ended by the fact that the american president hung up the phone in anger, everyone realized that things had not gone according to plan in the middle east, it felt like they had grabbed a piece that they couldn’t swallow now and back. grabbed, not so much they grabbed, it turned out i i think it’s a little more complicated, i want to remind you that in 2012 kissinger said that israel had 10 years left to exist, that is, until 2022, so my professional intuition

tells me that if it were not for our northern military district in 2022 , then the israel-israel conflict palistine would have happened exactly, exactly then, and in order to understand who grabbed what, you need to ask a very simple question: kibono, kirodvet, as they said in ancient rome, who benefits? and here is a very interesting thing that is beneficial to the americans and the british. the fact is that - americans, there is a big war in the middle east, the americans are thereby delivering an additional blow to europe, but since there is already a ukrainian conflict, and partly it solves the problem of a blow to europe, therefore. this war is not urgent for them, and even more so the elections, especially taiwan, that’s who needs the war here right now, it’s the british, you need to remember that who supports hamas, qatar. qatar is a british client, why do the british want this conflict? they

basically need a big war in the middle east, which will destabilize this zone, and a big war in the middle east is only possible as a war of the shiites. sunnis, but as long as israel exists, this war is not impossible. if you remember, in the first days of january austin disappeared, went to the hospital, and salevan did not know about it, but this is logical, the fact is that austin is from the obama clan, and sullivan is from the clinton clan, the clinton clan is not supposed to know what is happening inside austin's clan, that is, the severity of the conflict in the ruling layer of the united states is such that... there clan interests take precedence over national ones, the british, let's return to them, the british need a big war, because they need a macrozone in the post-global world, in the world of new globalization, they need their own zone and they want

to maximize it at the expense of pieces of the middle east, eastern europe, transcaucasia. there is one more point, a very tricky one, they need to weaken america. because the situation, in general, the relationship between the british and americans is very complicated, i want to remind you that the second world war initially arose as a conflict between the usa and great britain, it was then framed differently by other forces, but the british, in order to implement their projects, they need america to deal with someone else, during some conflicts, it has weakened, i have no direct evidence, but i am deeply convinced. that the current situation in america, the british certainly contributed to the situation, i also want to remind you that three mi6 agents were involved in the assassination of john kennedy. that is, in other words, here we see completely different behavior

of the british and israelis on the one hand, and the americans on the other. remember blinkin arrives, agrees that everything is over, negotiations, leaves, suddenly someone blows up the hospital. everything is going awry, that is, there is a very, very cunning combination there, it’s completely clear, for example , it’s clear to me that the conflict was provoked by the british, who... have been controlling hamas for a very long time, and the israelis control it, very interesting alliances are emerging in the middle east , on the one hand, great britain, qatar, turkey, hamas, on the other hand, china, saudi arabia, iran, that’s why the anglo-saxons need a big war in the middle east east, turn the arab part of the world into a huge ghetto, which... will be well beyond development, it is enough, by the way, to remember that recently almost

all secular regimes have been defeated in the arab world, in the arab world there are now significantly more secular regimes than 30 years ago, two questions arise here at once, the first of which is that stands or who stands behind the integrity of the houthis, in this case i am not trying to somehow direct the conversation to the obvious to iran, especially not. iran is definitely worth it, it's the same proxy of iran as hezbollah, let 's say, at this stage within a year, let's say to the same americans. it is not beneficial for the war to go beyond - large limits, and iran is in no

hurry to do this, i think that different countries will fight so that some will bring the conflict closer, others will push it further, but for now the houthis will inflict these blows on world trade, to take the breath away from iran’s opponents, and to provoke them, varan himself will say, take such a position, threaten from time to time. iranians these guys are actually very restrained , on the one hand they can say, hold me seven people, on the other hand, they can say, tear your vest off, but nevertheless, at the same time, with a very cold look, assess the situation, the current threats that are being voiced literally these days from washington, regarding the fact that austin says that we will not leave this so easily, meaning the three dead military personnel, and they openly say that they will take revenge on iran, while they say that.. .if

it requires diverting attention from internal problems, then completely different options are possible. a show where fighting is not done using physical force. as you know, playing sports contributes to the production of the hormone of happiness...

look, the vigil in the sky has appeared, a lot has been done, i’m happy, i’m happy, i’m happy.

we continue, a very important semantic line, even so, it is like, you know, gravity, which still gathers around itself the strongest in us, and not only belarusians and russians, st. petersburg 80 years since the complete lifting of the siege of leningrad, opening memorial complex to peaceful citizens of the soviet union who died in the great fatherland. the memory of the victims of that war and the heroism of our fathers and grandfathers today prevents many from living, especially the ideological henchmen of murderers and traitors, it is they who today honor the regiments in their parliaments,

it is they who started the war with the graves.

that is, this is a whole range of principles and values ​​that today are actually transforming the system of international relations that the united states imposed on us after ninety-one. noticed that here somehow, almost immediately after this ceremony, the presidents said such a phrase that we felt that it would be nice if someone from ukraine or there from ukraine stood nearby, after all, there are three slavic peoples, i think that it’s very many people this phrase - but the question immediately arises, under what conditions today is this in principle possible, given the situation in which our states and relations are now, well, we have always spoken about ... the three slavic peoples and have never denied that we we want to be united as we once were, but today this the situation until the power in ukraine changes, well, how can you, as we can imagine,

is it really possible that someone from the ukrainian today, the ruler of today’s government, could send their representatives to such an event, so until they come to power, they won’t politics will change, there will be no people who are close to our humanistic values, this is even impossible to imagine, unfortunately. but we leave this message, we are ready, we are ready for the reunification of the three slavic peoples. well, first of all, i agree with peter, that memorialization today of the memory of the great patriotic war, of the second world war, of real participants, winners, losers, real aggressors, real victims, is really a matter not only and not so much of history, but this is still a matter of modern politics, and that one.

we see changes in the entire narrative and what you are talking about in germany, when they began to pursue their famous policy of memory at the end of the 20th century, yes, which they later turned into a historical policy, it was aimed primarily at changing ideas about the germans, about removing the blame from the germans, about shifting it onto someone else, this was all done consistently, it was all done step by step, it was all done at the level of...

historical characters for whom they do not care no pain, no shame, then gradually all this was introduced as our own, step by step, colleagues , you are right, when we say, today, at the present moment, under the real ukrainian government, we, of course, do not see the possibility that third ukrainian leader will appear at such events, let’s develop this idea now, look, there’s a curious contradictory process in ukraine, look, on the one hand.

who advocates multipolarity, turn ukrainians into cannon fodder. the basis of banderaism is extremist-terrorist activity, and it is not an independent activity, but an activity that has always been financed from the outside, be it the abwehr, be it the cia, be it now the countries of the north atlantic alliance, that is, but this is enslavement and lack of independence consciousness of ukrainians that

their statehood...

the relationship between zelensky and zaluzhny , they tried, well, at first it was loud information that zelensky had summoned zaluzhny, they talked, zelensky invited the commander-in-chief to leave his post, he refused, then they began to say that this was stuffing rumors, but look, serious confirmation, two of the most serious western publications, the new york times, the american, citing their sources, the ukrainian authorities postponed zaluzhny’s resignation due to a leak of information about the resignation, and then... already clarifies the british magazine, the british magazine economist, zaluzhny refused the offer to take the post of secretary of the national security and defense council of ukraine. and in this case, understanding what is laid down, and zelensky, under the current political conditions, are avatars

of the west, in general they hide it little, it turns out that london and washington are sorting things out on the ukrainian field. what do you think this fight between zelensky and zaluzhny is about? well, there is also information that the west is... they don’t understand how this could happen, they are against such relations in general, resignation, not resignation, that is, this decision was supposedly made without their knowledge, but they were not consulted, and they were not consulted, it is clear that today they consulted, did not receive a blessing from them, but a hostage figure today who as a military commander , he seems to be losing the war, but on the other hand, he begins to grow as... a wealthy political figure, so wealthy, naturally, that zelensky is not needed, so today you can blame him for all the mistakes, flaws, everything that happened during a military operation and, well , roughly speaking, leak, this confrontation

will end with him leaving the scene, because naturally, he enjoys the support of certain sections of the population, certain trends there, so naturally, as a political figure, he is of no use to anyone needed, and as the commander-in-chief...

i did everything, i was removed like this, this is a sacrifice in fact, but such in the eyes of the people, and this would raise his rating even more , of course zelensky does not need a free zaluzhny, and, accordingly, if it’s like this the situation was being built, then by offering him to vacate the position of commander of the armed forces of ukraine, zelensky hoped that he would take him under supervision, if not, then there is no need to release him, let him sit in his place for now, and absolutely.

the media, which in my opinion is connected with the fact that there is now no consensus between the zelensky regime and washington on strategy. these are the military actions for 2024. biden needs a temporary freeze on the conflict. why? because he needs elections passed without any military or armed actions on the shelf, calmly, as much as possible. and he can demonstrate this, that look, we seem to have frozen and held the front of the conflict. and throughout 2023 , we saw how it sparkled before ourselves. zelensky tried to extort military equipment, military

aid, and this greatly irritated many people, and he tried to play on public opinion within western countries. the west has always built in this regard such a strategy of creating or managing specific societies through, when they have own power, own opposition. well, this is an instrument of pressure on zelensky, these two elements are interconnected , and for the west it is important to share power, they are elements of an attempt by the west, especially the united states of america, to freeze the conflict for a while so that the kiev regime gains strength in 1925 , as they themselves say, and they do not hide the launch of a new counter-offensive, as they say. look, your opinion is interesting, at the same time they are also developing such

a topic as a peaceful track, here is robert kolenyak, the minister of defense of slovakia says that the conflict in ukraine has no military solution, the time has come to talk about peace negotiations, how do you generally look at this, considering that we came here last year, i would just notice which countries are talking about a peace track, yes please, these are the countries of the former austro-hungarian empire, many will say, this is slovakia. italy, austria, southern germany, the territory

of hungary, that’s where, by the way, the germans brought a lot of their production, which are interested in revising that sanctions policy, in restoring energy at various points. the second point to this is that the united states of america is also partially interested in this, as i already said, for the election period, the track is ukrainian. a short video and we will continue this same topic,

the other day a video was released in which former adviser to the ukrainian president alexey restovich, while in the united states of america, answering a journalist’s question, spoke about what the negotiating group came to in 2022, and many saw in this video an attempt, an unsuccessful attempt by the arrest officer these from an awkward question, while others drew attention to the fact that in essence he says that there was an opportunity then to avoid huge... war of sustrich in istanbul, and there may be a group, i know that in two or three years there will be vzagali, and then the meeting of zelensky and putin, this was decided, the calendar was discovered, you understand, i know what i said, it’s not because i calmed down with nonsense, but it’s true, i’m like a miracle mind, i’m then washed myself, how do you remember? the whole war will last until the 35th, i respect you, no

except russian-ukrainian, and a series of wars in the world, and ukraine will be included, so otherwise it will be under the influx of all wars, or it will fight, or it will be under the influx of everyone, i told the truth, god, like mr. ika bula, so i having slept then, you are 23 years old and true, although in reality two or three years were true, i knew for sure the calendar of the istanbul zustriches, everything went to reconciliation, just like that, two or three weeks and everything went on about reconciliation, but we saw, that in fact, of course...

we know very well how many opinions of the consolidated european elite there are, that britain stands for as long a war of attrition as possible, and that its main goal is, of course, military defeat, that is, they are consolidated here with the europeans, although they left the european union, but russia has no illusions about the reliability of the agreement with the countries west, that's how the secretary puts it. the usa, nato, their satellites, with the help of the kiev nazi regime and various kinds of mercenaries, are waging a proxy war against our people and state, which the anglo-saxon world will not stop, even with

the end of the burning phase of the conflict in ukraine. we all know very well how britain ends its military projects, it divides the country into several parts, we have a huge number of examples, including the two koreas, yes, these are a number of other states, that is , when they get tired of the ukrainian project or when they achieve any goals that they planned there, they will also stop it, today, as you see, america, the usa refused to give money, that is, there is no money, a state that prints money endlessly, they have no money. kiev again made regular promises to support them in these hostilities until the last ukrainian. well, here we are again mentioning the states, and meanwhile, under self-propelled joe’s window, if not

a civil war, then unrest is brewing. they clearly demonstrate that the american idea is no longer selling well not only in the world, but in the united states itself. governors immediately. several states have pledged support to texas amid a feud with the biden administration over its right to enforce its borders. virginia, oklahoma and south dakota stated that they are together with texas. florida governor ron disantis said the same thing. what do these states have in common? common values ​​from christianity to large families. in general , the story with ihas is interesting. few people remember that before joining the united states, it was an independent republic for 9 years, and there are still enough people there who are fighting.

because here we can rather talk about such a quietly sluggish rebellion below, rather than in

the elites, because the elites very clearly limit themselves and understand that the system cannot be broken, this is a matter of survival, yes the question is that the same trump is not against globalization, trump just proposes to focus on internal problems for now.

our desire of russia and belarus with the people's republic of china is at the forefront of this

, russia is at the forefront, because it bears the most burden and suffers more than anyone, and the reason for all this is the houthis and the middle east, and the south china sea, the melting of problems, that's all it does not mean that a multipolar world is coming, as the russian foreign minister said. monopolists, so they are trying to maintain a unipolar world using different methods, using different methods , they have reached the point of armed conflicts, we discussed economic problems, and work on the asian continent, especially in africa, where we are called, vladimirovich knows, we coordinated my trips to africa, i talked with the presidents, they are really waiting for us there, but here is yulia konstantinovna. there is a feeling that our union is getting a second wind, well, today many experts, including the international monetary fund, are introducing a concept such as

geopolitical fragmentation, that is, they say that the period of globalization is not only over, but suspended, all countries are beginning to be divided into separate blocks, these can be blocks of countries that are located in quite a few neighboring countries, in this case our union state, this there may be countries that...

old globalization, and expresses in these words, the united states has lost its undeniable supremacy in the world due to the rise of china and the revanchism of russia, even here they could not

ignore this assessment, alekseyovich, how do you look at this, well... firstly, the union of belarus and russia should be perceived not only, even not so much, as a response to the challenges of globalization and deglobalization there, but this should be perceived as , first of all, our internal sovereign matter . belarus, as a sovereign state , determines for itself the direction of its foreign and domestic policy, determining for itself how it will build the lives of its citizens in order to make this life as good as possible, which has already been determined in the past. having chosen for close integration with the russian federation, we have defined this as the main vector of our foreign policy, and we see that we were right, because we preserve our thousand-year-old historical ties, spiritual ties, economic ties, political, military and all other ties, and we see , that this is

the desire to create, laid down even before all the crises of globalization. with its closest neighbors, and not just partnerships, but purely trusting ones , to build a union state, which are these aspirations today, in the era of collapse global peace, gave their dividends , that is, we turned out to be right when we decided to rely on our own strengths, on our closest neighbors and develop what already exists, and not chase after some kind of happiness incomprehensible to the bird, trade there with countries with whom we have never traded, that’s why... of course, building relations within the framework of a union state helped us survive and will continue to help us, thanks to the alliance with russia, which is certainly on the international stage, it is a more authoritative entity, and has great connections, this helps belarus promotes its interests in the foreign policy arena, russia helps us join these alliances, which

are also beneficial for us, but we must understand that... including our sovereign choice. the union state of belarus russia is, first of all, an instrument for the implementation of the sovereignty of both belarus and russia, we see this from the agenda that was, this agenda is not about the past, this is an agenda about electronics, about space, about mutual defense and security, but fundamental modernization, not easy.

from the points of this new multipolar globalization, and this again, returning to the first thesis, is the guarantee of our sovereignty and independence. thank you for participating in this conversation, that’s all for today, thank you for being with us for this hour, see you in a week, happily.

and their path to their own happiness is incredibly interesting and complex in its own way. seeing the response of modern people to the holidays that i and my students celebrate, it resonates with everyone, the language of joy. the language of a smile, the language of laughter is understood by all peoples of the earth. sometimes i feel like santa claus, because, probably, on every belarusian christmas tree there are already products from our production, eating our christmas tree decorations. each story is

a motivation to change your life for the better. art is a book of development, like a branch, it gradually blossoms, then it matures and grows. for me, this all made a huge difference. the spatial path that i will find in life. watch the project belarusians on the belarus 24 tv channel . watch everything that modern belarus lives today on the belarus 24 tv channel. this is the news of the country and abroad. broadcasts are especially important. events, live broadcasts from the scene, current interviews with famous belarusians,