students in the engineering specialty, we cooperate with institutions of higher education; since september 1, we have established cooperation with the belarusian state technological university in conducting research work and career guidance conversations. during this period, we have already visited this university three times. in addition to the engineering profile, the loshnitsa gymnasium opens classes of military-patriotic agrarian and pedagogical orientation, the latter being the most popular among students. high level.

there are trees, there are stone materials, and there are yana there was such a, well, seemingly imitative, historical creation of significant cultural entities in the region. shchuchansky palace , trutsky lyubensky prisoner in the old month, there was already a noble wedding, when it was broken, it seems, the school park, and when the hand of stanislav yundziv struck, these nobles are familiar...

i would say that these are people, gentlemen smart people second - this is a very strong country, very beautiful, wherever you go, you can look wherever you want, it’s beautiful there, a small country, nevertheless there is a lot of things here beautiful, a lot of interesting things , females, the largest co-conservator in belarus, the belovezhskaya pusha, and i think that my favorite place here in belarus is the grotto, the city where i study, there is a special atmosphere that surrounds you and...

a new issue and a new meeting with interesting interlocutors, we record the main events and try to figure out cause and effect.

communications, today we are helped in this by a retired colonel of the foreign intelligence service, professor gemo andrei bezrukov. andrey olegovich, hello, as always, you are welcome see. good afternoon, mutually. 2024 is an election year around the world; the main attention, of course, will be focused on the election campaigns in russia and the united states. let's start with the first one. many say that russia is now making not just a political choice, but a fateful choice, and not only for the russians themselves. do you agree with this statement? i agree, in fact, the twenty-fourth year is a turning point, firstly, we entered a completely different world, this is a confrontational world, and for 2 years we have already been waging a war, we have been waging a war against the collective the west, which understands that it is in a deep crisis, and it is coming out of this crisis through war, it is trying to mobilize.

which is, well, how to say, if not the leader, then one of the leaders of the growing movement for the redivision of the world, for making the world multipolar, for making this world more stable, less

dependent on the whims of the west and the united states, to build the so-called world of the majority, and in domestic politics we have passed a certain stage. we realized that the system that was built in the nineties it is not viable in the future world, it needs to be rebuilt, in the last few years we have been looking for how russia can accelerate its development, how it can build a system that would be fairer, that would help innovation, help economic growth, now we were pushed, in fact... into the restructuring of our entire system, into the restructuring of our entire country, we, of course, wanted this, because we understood that the country could not live according to the patterns that were prescribed for her, the west, and this period is ending, and

just the elections now show the rise of new forces in the country, and the rise of patriotic forces, after all... many who disagree, many of those for whom the nineties, for whom the nineties were a wonderful time, who profited from the nineties, all their comrade, who served them ideologically, entertained them and so on, she either ran away, or became completely politically uncompetitive, or she simply got lost, disappeared into the sand and...

usa, there are many examples here, and what is happening around texas, and even a trip , tucker carlson’s moscow business trip, which showed what the notorious american democracy is worth, almost every word here, in which direction andrei olegovich will turn, will it lead to a civil confrontation, because well, from the outside it seems that what -this is an incredible intensity of passions, well , look, on the one hand, you shouldn’t exaggerate. a rich country, there is still a margin of safety, and this is a country that, in general, has felt united for the last 150 years, it lived together, it forgot the experience

civil war, but the conflict that we now see is deep, it is primarily economic, it is a conflict, let me... itself distributes it into pockets, and it went to a small, small group of people, and 50% look at this group and they say: listen, how is this so, but awareness of the mechanisms through which this was done

due to both propaganda and simply the american way of life, which is still generally quite strong from the point of view of the american dream, and it has not yet concentrated . main the question of how to divide the money, why this is so, the american audience was distracted by the climate, the battle of the sexes, the... ruling class, it is fighting for cash flow, the states now have two economies, in itself which part of this ruling class will own the opportunity to distribute this flow, for the last 40 years financiers have done it, media people have done it, they have done it. and people involved in high technologies, and they are concentrated in a fairly narrow

geographical framework, these are large cities, these are new york, miami, san francisco, in these cities there is one life, but in the whole other country, in the country of the republicans, trump, texas and so on, life there is somewhat different, these two countries. those who look differently at what is going on in the economy and who makes money from it will naturally now sort things out, who is in charge? well, what we see on the political field, well, in fact , imagine, it’s now clear that there are two people who have declared, well , officially from their party, that is, biden and trump, they have no competitors. but as i already said, you you know, of these two we understand which horse runs faster, yes, but they are running through

a minefield, so it’s impossible to predict anything yet, besides, after all, the convention that they will have somewhere in the middle of summer, it can nominate absolutely any person, not necessarily the one who wins the primaries, and looking at this situation, it’s a very tough redistribution. political and fierce political competition, everyone understands that this entire season of elections will be even dirtier than the previous ones, that they will dig under candidates and under parties, it is even more cruel that the american ruling class has a couple more such cycles of redistribution of power on its hands, that is, this does not ...

work, everyone understands that these two candidates are from the past, and not from the future, but on no one wanted to show up in the future, because they understand what they will have to go through, and imagine, now some young, let’s say, desantis, who has all the qualities to become president, becomes president, wins elections, first party ones , then already at the level of the entire country, he gets a broken... country and can’t do anything, and becomes the worst

president in the history of the united states, well , who needs that, yes, isn’t it easier for him to have another 20 years, and he’s 45, almost 45, yes , isn’t it easier for him to sit still for another 20 years, wait until the country finally finds itself more or less, when the wind blows in the other direction, then become the best president who pulled the country out of this hole, yes, well, that’s all politicians are looking at... who will be accountable for this, who will be accountable for who, they will ask their people and

those who bet on them from abroad as a battering ram against russia, you, to the extent you were able to fulfill this function, you took one country, and you left it for descendants better or worse, by the way, the same question will be asked and.. .people in western europe and in eastern europe, by the way, too, there was a wonderful country germany with a working economy, now... this country is better than it was 5 years ago or even 3 years ago or worse, who will be responsible for this, and naturally, none of the politicians want to answer, everyone is looking for scapegoats, everyone understands that now there will be very tough showdowns, because all their friends and comrades will understand that they

are weakening, that they can profit, that they can, so to speak, eat a little carrion. then akhila missed, we need to take his place , while still, while the place is still warm , this struggle for power begins, and naturally, what kind of elections can there be in this struggle, everything will be black, if we close the topic specifically with zelensky, if his they’ll push you to the wall, let’s say, with legitimacy there or even with a physical threat, they won’t try to launch some kind of man-made a black swan in the form of attacks on the zaporozhye nuclear power plant or some variants of dirty bombs. this is directly for our security, you know, everything is possible, because from the point of view of the curators, ukraine is becoming more and more a written-off asset, that is, if earlier they thought that they would get this country entirely,

now realizing that this is not it’s so simple and possible... i wouldn’t undertake it, because this is not their territory, you can do whatever you want with it, remember, the germans in world war ii, what they didn’t do in ukraine, yes, that there was land that they were ready to burn for the sake of their interests, do you think the europeans have some other understanding

of ukraine, russia or something, this is not their land, in blue light, then if necessary, we will set fire to anything, it’s better the russians will get less, it is quite likely that there will be people who can do anything. belarus strengthens ties in central asia the official visit of the president to uzbekistan, just like that, precedes what is called for us. this is a partnership, what comes first, nikolainovich? this is the development of its political a multi-vector component, replacing to some extent the losses that we suffered in the european part, or in trade with europe. well, probably, let's say this, for a certain time we did not pay a little attention to this region, and this is the richest

region, as for uzbekistan, a lot is not little, this is a country a little twice... larger than belarus, but in terms of population 36 million , just in case, the country with the highest , so to speak, demographic dynamics in this region and the richest country, no need to talk about that forget, this is gold, this is oil , this is gas, these are rare earth metals, well, probably a very important direction is uranium, we have our own nuclear power plant, we needed it, and this region has been doing very well for many years.

central asia, because this entire central asian region, more than 80 million people live there, these are very great opportunities for our real industry, the real sector of the economy, the food industry, textiles, this is the organization of joint ventures, suffice it to say that only on the belarusian universal commodity exchange, the number of uzbek enterprises registered has reached almost 200. almost 200, as for trade turnover, trade turnover does not reflect the possibility of its growth, well, at the moment it... is about $600 million trade turnover between the two countries, between uzbekistan and belarus , but everything shows that in the coming year we

can double it, and by the way, he already visited it in 2018, in the twenty-second year the prime minister of belarus was there on an official visit. more than once in addition to the official visit, there were international events within the framework. sovereignty of the country's independence, why? the economy is strengthening, ties are strengthening, sales are strengthening, so many contracts have already been signed at the forum of regions, here is information that the forum of regions has already led to

the signing of dozens of contracts that are mutually beneficial to both belarus and uzbekistan, what is uzbekistan, it is the center of the silk road, look at the countries, with which it borders is not only uranium, it is not only other valuable materials that are there, what you can do there is also... the logistics center of asia, that's it. second, how does the policy of a sovereign state differ from that of a non-sovereign state? now, everything that the president has done in matters of foreign policy over these years has always been such aggressive work, aggressive in the good sense of the word, for the national interests of the country, that is , he has always worked all over the world, the main thing is that it is beneficial for belarus, we take not a sovereign state, lithuania is next door, so we don’t work with belarus, why? lithuanians want it, but they forbid us white

that after the twentieth year he wanted to isolate us, a complete failure of isolation, in place of isolation, on the contrary, our international authority has grown, moreover, it is growing all over the world and even in europe, where they wanted and even in europe today they listen to our country, that’s the main one, well, then let’s go to those topics, i think that we will still have a lot of reasons to discuss these meetings, the agreements that were in uzbekistan, let’s go to the events that are exciting the news reports these days. this is of course ukraine. the topic of the resignation of the commander-in-chief of the sssu zaluzhny as a symptom. zelensky broke the silence. in an interview with an italian channel, raya admitted. i

'm thinking about this replacement, but it's not like we would replace just one person, it's an issue that affects the entire management team. zaluzhny himself brought the dispute into the public sphere with a high-profile article for cnn, from which it follows that he still believes in victory over russia, and considers the drone to be the main means of waging war , and has already stated that he will not interfere in kiev’s possible decision to dismiss the commander in chief, what the the game is played on the bank, oleg sergeevich, look, first, it’s scary that i won’t even start with this, so i listened to zelensky, yes, and i would like to hear something else, so... it would be his best statement, the only one all the time he was working in kiev, it was he who came out and said: the whole team that came with me, we sold ukraine,

we admit that we betrayed everything, we are all leaving together, we are all leaving, we ask that our voluntary departure become a mitigating circumstance in the court of the ukrainian people over us, but this will not happen, now that happens, using the example of the games around the resignation of zaluzhny, it becomes obvious who... is waging a war with the russian federation, all personnel decisions are not made in ukraine, when the united states says: “we will not interfere, i have never heard a greater lie in my life. in fact, until now this resignation has not happened only because the western partners are against this resignation. and now why does zelensky want to change? that’s the tragedy, where i started, and then moved on to another topic. the tragedy is that here they are sitting in kiev, zelensky,

those around him, and think." they are sitting and hoping for something, to sit in kiev for as long as possible, to fill their pockets as much as possible, so that later, when all this is over, and it will end in complete defeat, which means the reformation of the ukrainian state, to escape to london, to escape to where -they also sit, as they remember this insight, zaluzhny was allowed to take the post of british ambassador, their whole life is thinking about how to escape with money calmly,

look at the publication. ran to kiev and they themselves answer: obviously there were real fears, that zaluzhny can deploy the army to use it to persecute zelensky, hence the task, they write, of nuland to reassure zaluzhny and offer him incentives to behave decently. the biden administration wants the war in ukraine to continue at least until after the us presidential election in november, but it exists.

she tried to find a balance between them, to give both one and the other some kind of assurance that today their tandem could still take place and act in the interests of third parties, let’s call it that, but specifically regarding zaluzhny, he has a fairly good rating in ukraine, he is perceived because he is one of the few commanders who, during zelensky’s presidency, had four different defense ministers, four people.

who, by and large, plundered the country helped zelensky in this, here i completely agree with this, this is a team that worked precisely to enrich this system, and zaluzhny, he is a little in the country, no matter how it is, he is always on the front line, he is among military, it has a certain weight rating, he is perceived as a possible leader of the nation, this is what zelensky really doesn’t like, and what zelensky is doing, he tried to destroy. a figure as a thought, but they explained to him to stand, while zaluzhny cannot be touched, while you are solving one problem, fighting with russia, you must work together for now. well, the most important thing is that the results of the so -called counter-offensive must be blamed on someone. this is the most important thing, because the counter-offensive of the ukrainian armed forces has turned into a real human and national

tragedy. ukrainian fields are littered with damaged american, british, french and all european equipment, and ukrainian cemeteries are filled up, covered with earth on the graves of soldiers, so someone must be guilty. the second point, of course, i agree with my colleagues, zaluzhny must be neutralized as quickly as possible from zelensky’s point of view, because his rating is crazy. zaluzhny's rating reaches 90%. some give 80, some 88, while zelensky’s rating is from 40 to 62%. according to the same surveys, the same sociological ones.

minister of defense of ukraine, this is a scam man, mr. umerov, of course, he is not an ethnic ukrainian, which adds to the indignation among ukrainian military personnel, and of course,

he also entered into a dispute with zaluzhny, so umerov set an unequivocal condition for his removal, so in the coming days we will consider this whole thing like this say. but it was very important to offer zelensky a good portion, a good bone, so that he would not raise an army, but he could raise an army, you know, when you look at the position of the united states, this is how they are trying, that’s the same salifon, yes, when he says that the white house will not interfere in kiev’s decisions, it certainly looks funny, but it’s especially funny when, on the one hand, they play democrats, on the other hand, they do what’s happening to the journalist now .

.. if they have a criminal journalist who is just interviewing, then who are those who really betrayed the country, those who sold it for pennies, that means they left, now they are sitting there in warsaw, vilnius, you see what double standards, second moment, already obvious to the whole

world, i have never seen, to be honest, in any europe, nor in other countries, for anyone to believe these words of the americans about democracy and freedom, it has turned into dust so much over the years, you know, the first call was when there was an invasion of iraq, the bombing of yugoslavia, even then there was a lot sensible people have been asked this question. i recently, i advise you all, reconsider the speech of the president of our country in the state duma of russia in the mid-nineties, so it was, i don’t remember, ninety-four, ninety-five , you know, i included, that’s all that is happening now, he then talked about the middle east, that he met with the leaders of many countries in the middle east... and they asked the question why you abandoned us, you can’t imagine what will happen in the middle east later, everything came true, and today, after all these events, after ukraine, which is being destroyed every day, we just discussed zaluzhny, which means zelensky, and where are

the ukrainians in this scheme, where are they, now no one even perceives zelensky as a president, everyone sees this against the background of what is happening, that these are just the heads of the appointed us administration, who... the main thing is to prolong the war as long as possible, what kind of democracy, everyone is already laughing, against this background europe is nearby, which no longer knows how to explain to its own population, which is making crap. central squares of european cities, why should they continue to give money from the european pockets of ordinary citizens to continue the war, so that biden has a chance to be re-elected, but they continue, but they continue, because there is no sovereignty, there is no sovereignty, so trouble, well, let's move on then, this is an alarming trend, meanwhile the west is dreaming...

the movement of military equipment across its territory is practically uncontrolled. but these events in ukraine today have accelerated

the process of solving the problem, put pressure on certain states, as we would say , they have lost their own sovereignty , the ability to counteract this pressure, and the fear of war, which is being fueled, is being fueled on the european continent and is being used as a tool for manipulating consciousness citizens, namely the consciousness of the citizens, not...

of the lithuanian city of mariampoly, were

scared to death by the teachings that no one warned them about. armed soldiers walk along the streets of the city and check everyone’s documents, deputy of the lithuanian seimas danius gaizhas reported this on local radio. the residents are very frightened - he said, people are frightened every day that war is about to start, and it doesn’t seem at all like being in nato, in this case the lithuanians would feel safe, which means none. they have no security, but i i’ll start a little bit differently from this, today i also open an article on one extremist publication, the article is called a possible war scenario in the event of an attack by russia, which is possible soon, that is, it really scares the population, but now we look at europe, here is europe, every day we we see what is happening now in european cities, farmers, and that means not only farmers, are on strike, throwing shit away, millions of migrants, tens of millions of migrants, at this time... macron walks around and says: tomorrow we have

mobilization, we're going to war with russia, so he and his wife will go, he won't go, that means i 'll put pitchforks on his people, go fight, it's impossible, that means it's impossible neither in austria nor in germany, the war machine of europe , it lies at the bottom, now about the risks , what is really dangerous, why are we going to raise our defense capabilities, here is poland, lithuania, our neighbors, tell the poles there too to go to war, except for the nationalists there.

split from within, make this political protester out of someone, try to create a maidan, a square, as soon as you split country, then there are already risks of military invasion, i partially agree with my colleagues that you will not agree, that’s interesting then, but good, that means, well, it’s obvious that the people of europe don’t want to fight, that’s obvious, but something else is absolutely obvious that the countries of the european union are preparing for a military conflict. it is impossible to underestimate their power, strength, mobilization potential, we have already observed kiev in 3 days and the same bold statements, we must look at actions, actions all indicate that public opinion is being intensified, robert

bauer, the head of the nato military committee, in his times article, clearly spoke about the timing of the next military action, the next big one. for the first time in 30 years , another military camp with all communications, all the logistics infrastructure, and even a chapel was handed over to the lithuanian military. in march , the construction of the third military camp, siauliai, will be completed

, a logical question is asked, by the way, each town is designed to accommodate approximately a battalion group of 800 people, the question is asked: why, when we are building hospitals, schools, clinics, enterprises , they are arming themselves, building military camps, for the first time, i note, in 30 years, which means that there is some kind of strategy, within the framework of this strategy the issue of military confrontation is probably being considered, therefore, from my point of view, there is no way to relax in case, thinking that... the western countries will not have mobilization potential is also probably wrong, this is a question of technology, literally a few propaganda films, some kind of series...

your opinion is interesting. nato secretary general nominated for the nobel peace prize. over the past year, no one has done more for peace and democracy in europe and the world than john stoltenberg, said deputy chairman of the liberal party of norway abil raja, who nominated the candidacy of nato secretary general. in general, such an initiative looks as if the roosters, the name of the best in the henhouse, put forward the wolf. and it’s a pity, of course, that the americans from the political magazine have already given barel the title. we talked about this for years, and it would have competed for the nobel peace prize, it is not surprising, because we remember how

obama was called the great peacemaker who started wars, secondly, all these awards, from the nobel prize to others, have long turned into a geopolitical circus. unfortunately, politics has penetrated into all these areas, people are already being nominated who have nothing to do with it, and by the way, this is proof of only one thing that we constantly say, how much information war and propaganda is in the first place today, because this is on purpose done, it's made on purpose in order to fool millions of people that nato is supposedly a peace -loving state, and will still return to war, yuri expressed his position, which means that of course we cannot relax, if we relaxed, we would have already attacked, we are not attacked just one by one for a simple reason, they know that nothing will work out if nato saw at least 10%. the possibility of victory over belarus and russia, the attack would have happened today. all these bases that they put up, they hope for

what? not that they will win by military means, why are the bases being prepared in lithuania, why are they preparing some things, they hope that in the twentieth it didn’t work out, in the twenty-fourth they see, well damn, it won’t work, it’s already clear that it won’t work, there are 2 weeks left before the elections, in they don’t believe in the twenty-fifth year, but we will not relax, but there is hope in the thirtieth and beyond, the thirty-fifth. forty, suddenly the belarusians and russians will tremble there, suddenly they want a maidan activist, suddenly they’ll give a ride, suddenly they ’ll go out into the street again with balloons, a pistol in their pockets, supposedly for the sake of democracy, here’s their chance, then under with the sight of some kind of volunteer amusing regiments of kalinovsky, nato troops will come in, you know, there is one axiom, no one can destroy us from the outside, only us from the inside, about this, by the way, ours...

we will not just be a common, let’s say, certainly set, that anything can be written down, how our document corresponds to the real state of affairs, how sensibly we see everything that can happen tomorrow the day after tomorrow. let's start with the fact that for almost a year now the concept of national security, which is the basis military doctrine , is freely available, and what we just talked about, including here at this table,

is not there, we clearly distributed it, there were many different units of all kinds, we clearly understand how it is, then the concept of risks, the threat challenges that have been, they are now outlined, it is said what, how, to what extent, what to respond to. the next point that needs to be said is that we gave it, specifically showed who our possible opponents are. before we were always silent, now we clearly said, this is nato, this is the usa, this is lithuania, this poland. the so-called baltic countries have prescribed that we do not perceive any state, no people as an enemy, this is the thesis specifically regarding the people, but there are people,

there is power, which is power. not independent and ready to accept any other person’s point of view and carry out the order that will be given, all this is reflected in this doctrine, plus, probably, it should be noted that we have described how we will react to certain attacks against us , all this is also in this doctrine, it’s not for nothing that it became 46 pages, unlike previous 21, well, just in case, i don’t want to talk about the details of each one she will wear.

most importantly, it has everything necessary to ensure its own national security. i would also like to draw three points that we never said, but noted in it, we wrote down the possibility of a military response to the impact on our critical infrastructure. we have always been shy and silent, but in other states this has been written for a long time, and we enshrine it in

our doctrine, we say it clearly. to the whole world, that we are not threatening anyone, but we will not allow ourselves to be offended. we have prescribed the possibility of our own forces participating in csto events. we have prescribed the possibility of using the potential to solve problems in all states, our csto states. plus the political component, how we will interact with all political organizations in the military sphere. it's all in this document. and they clarified the composition of the forces of the state, the means of the military organization of the state in full, which can be used to solve problems. by by and large, we prescribed the nationwide character of the defense of the state , what i was talking about, what kind of criticism, so you asked a question, so i laughed, laughed, it’s still an old broken record from poland and lithuania, our crazy people there who are sitting, what did they

see in doctrine, as always, the loss of su'. belarus, as always, is delusional, that is, the loss of the sovereignty of poland, when they have nato in full, decides everything for them, they don’t see, which means, yes, the loss of the sovereignty of ukraine, they don’t see, the loss of the sovereignty of lithuania, which they don’t ask at all, lithuanians they woke up, about some base, the lithuanians are waking up, american soldiers are raping a lithuanian girl or pestering her there, that is, this is not a loss of sovereignty, when belarus, building an alliance with russia, strengthens its state sovereignty. on an equal basis, on an equal basis, ensures peace on its territory, as always, for 30 years, they have the same nonsense about the loss of sovereignty, well , for us this is the main indicator that means we are doing everything right, correctly, that’s what i wanted to say that, if they write like that, great, we’ll strengthen it further and do even more, and let's also go to tennis, oleg sergeevich very emotionally continued the topic, after all , a section has appeared in our military doctrine

that clearly explains why and for what... our territory has nuclear weapons, something that they have been trying to supply us with for a certain time in reproach that we are like this, we clearly say that this is an element of preventive deterrence, something that we broadcast on all platforms, but today it is written down in our document, and it says: people, dear colleagues, neighbors, behave well , get on with your life, don't interfere with us.

brown, no, with any attempt at aggression , our neighbors, first of all the ukranazis, must know this, the answer will be instant, decisive and immediate, this is a guarantee: the national security of our country, thank you for this conversation, thank you to our viewers for having this time with us, see you in a week, in the new issue of the program objectively, see you.

100 brave guys gathered in our studio, igor alexandrovich, why do you think did the children choose you to talk to? first of all, if the children chose, it means that they saw me quite often on tv, well , the second thing is that children always like large dimensions, each of them has a question for the adult. i'm ready, then let's begin. what happens if you turn off your phone for the whole day? the heroes of the program will have to open up to the audience. the main task is to honestly answer all original, and sometimes awkward

questions. well, you understand that children can sometimes ask very awkward questions. this cool. i love awkward questions. do you promise to tell only the truth? yes. i noticed you have very nice shoes, and could you tell me how to walk correctly... watch the project 100 questions for adults on the belarus 24 tv channel

. you are watching the panorama live, tatyana korol is with you, good evening!