hello, we welcome everyone who is with us now, we don’t often talk here about those who call themselves the political opposition, yet our program is not humorous, serious, and since most often they either ask for money or noisily divide it, then well and there’s nothing special to say, and it’s not interesting, except in those cases when they reach a dangerous point and, consciously or not, begin to broadcast threats, here’s an example, andrei sainikov, if you remember this one, once even ran for president, said that. .. must develop a program

preventive strike on belarus, in response to clarification, the presenter confirmed: yes, of course, nato attacks on control points on the territory of russia and belarus. andrei petrovich, as a military man, when you hear something like this, what is the first thing that comes to mind? well, the first thing that came to mind is that i have a feeling that this character has been in a lethargic sleep since 2010, because quite a large number of different national strategies have already been adopted. both the united states of america and nato, where issues related precisely, as they say, to nuclear deterrence, pass everywhere with a red line. well, for example, the national security strategy of the united states. the waving of a nuclear club there, well , is visible throughout the entire document, and it specifically says that the united states should be able to conduct military operations simultaneously with two nuclear powers, well, look, sannikov, yes, in this case, too. well, in this

case i put it in quotes, because there was a whole group of people who could voice this, most likely that he voices not his own personal considerations, but the fact that a certain narrative was imposed on him from above, the question arises , because all the people who are on the territory of belarus, even if they are not supporters of the current government, are unlikely to support his call to carry out preventive strikes on the territory where they live, so the question arises, who is this message intended for? well 100%. probably, the leadership of nato, the leadership of the united states, hardly even knows who sannikov is, but we know him and how you they said, about the very same company that failed, tomorrow we will forget, and tomorrow we will forget him, just as we forgot him before this statement, this is all designed for one thing, only in order to somehow shake up the situation a little, to show about the fact that belarus and russia are real enemies for them, and that today it is only me... a nuclear club

that is capable of calming down these bloody regimes, as they present it, and providing an opportunity for the development of democracy, well, as far as possible, as far as possible this can be implemented in modern conditions, well, probably just recently, vladimirovich putin literally said, launching any preventive nuclear strike will put an end to the entire world community, we will go back at best to the stone age, and most likely humanity will simply cease to exist. yes, andrei, i will say that there is a lithuanian center, there is a polish center, today a third center seems to be appearing, this is british, that is, they have kept themselves a little in the country for now, but today the polish center, which is working, is having problems with belsat, since the radical agenda is sagging a little there, there is a problem with the change of power, here the british center is asserting itself a little again, tsaynikov passed certain examinations even before the twentieth year, he did not pass them, that is, then he was already a written-off figure for subsequent events, but now the british are again throwing in a little bit of this more radical agenda. how they did it

all the time throughout the northern military district, why is this being done, well, this is the second question, but again, most likely they are trying at the polish center to seize the initiative there with these battalions, to secure some kind of sympathy for the more radical part of the opposition there, and therefore there is a certain redistribution of influence, but not of course the preparation of some kind of strike there - this is all ridiculous, moreover, from a military point of view, i think they will support me in terms of the fact that it was the americans who managed to overcome this nuclear parity in terms of the fact that they learned to fight against a nuclear state with the wrong hands, but ukraine is an example of how they will fight, if anything... against us or against russia further , that is, this a proven new methodology, which will include this hybrid attack there from some supposed belarusian formations, this is their place, and of course, there is no preventive nuclear strike, this is a movie, but nevertheless, someone is investing it is in the mouth, in this case it is necessary again again, it seems to me that those who are listening remember the words that were spoken more than once, for example by vladimir putin, when we now understand that a threat against russia is a threat against belarus , threat against belarus is perceived accordingly as a threat in russia. about them, a phrase

that has already been heard more than once, it would not be superfluous to recall it now, let’s listen, as for belarus, it is part of the union state, and the unleashing of aggression. against belarus will mean aggression against the russian federation, to which we will respond with all the means at our disposal. i agree with andrey, the first, of course, main motive here is intraspecific struggle, these spiders are biting into jars, and they need to pull as much of this foam to the surface as possible radical figures in order to stake out a position, here you are already absolutely right, first of all in media information.

and they are no longer planning their return here, yeah, let’s move on, then olga igoryevna, continuing the topic of national security, we somehow out of habit tie this to the military, to employees of special services, here the day before the president, communicating with rectors universities, indicated that

in fact the scope of this concept is much wider. i propose now to remember this fragment, then analyze it in more detail, please, education has never been and cannot be outside of politics.

and the most amazing answer that i heard is that these graduates simply come to the real world, our education, american and in many ways the leading universities of the european union, has become divorced from the needs of the real world, it seems to me that in the situation with belarus the situation is exactly the opposite, that is, in university education lags behind the realities of our... social, economic progress and development, so i don’t quite agree that we

have formulated, further formulated the ideology in first of all, the ideology of education , after all, if we are building a state for the people, then those concepts that we put in the philosophical, and more broadly in the social disciplines that are taught at the university, in economics, and there, well, in everything. key disciplines that form the image of a person, we need, first of all , to start not from notes, which , as i said 10 years ago , their authors themselves very harshly criticized, but to proceed from the real state of affairs, primarily in the belarusian, russian, and eurasian economics, here andrei evgenievich, well, now some critic will say that , well, don’t we expect from universities, first of all , that they create a high-class specialist. a specialist or ideologist will say a critic, it’s impossible to break it apart, it’s like splitting a person in half, well, let’s cut off

a person’s head and let him work only with his hands and feet, if we need a narrow specialist who mercantilely moves balls, such work is low valued and the training of such a specialist is valued accordingly low enough. if a man comes to higher school, we really need to be sure that education will fulfill its main purpose and convey. a young personality, an image of a future person, an image of a future economy, an image of future social relations, otherwise it is worth nothing. andrey petrovich, you, as a teacher, constantly work with young people, how do you generally look at this issue, at this problem, is there a problem? i want to start with the words of mikhail matusovsky, where the homeland begins, with the picture in your primer, with the good and the faithful comrades living in the next yard? or maybe it begins with the song that our mother sang to us, something that

no one can take away from us in any trials, look what these words are about, these two quatrains contain the meaning of everything, the homeland begins with schooling , with the abc book , the homeland begins with the mother, the homeland begins with the street, with the internet, everything is said in these four verses, and what the president said yesterday was, in many ways, a cry from the soul, well, what is the deep meaning in everything... there was, you remember, the twentieth year, who bore the brunt? yes, security forces , yes, government authorities, well , remember that this fell on our teachers, educators who were at the polling stations, everywhere, who then defended them, i still remember one teacher, professor who stood, either at bsu , or in guir, i don’t remember, at a lecture when they shouted: “we are the power here, we are the power here, but this one teacher, he is worth a platoon of amon,” not because he is so physically strong. but because he was capable of it to resist this crowd, to keep those guys who, for the most part, remained

in this audience, you look at what our education should and does represent today, in which the president is a thousand times right, that education begins with the abc book , and that in addition to three, in addition to the tasks of teaching , the process of education goes side by side, every teacher must educate and educate precisely... a person who is a patriot, is a statesman, is a citizen, these three components, therefore, must necessarily be the basis should be fulfilled, the first in any educational process during any forms and types of classes, firstly, these are general educational goals, well, where are the basic principles of objectivity, scientificity, and so on, the second is a professional installation, where... as i say , professional chauvinism, yes, why is your profession better than others, the third is the ideological component,

that’s it, where these questions related to patriotism are embedded precisely in the very process of training, education, further, with what begins, for example, here they say at my academy, the first thing when a cadet comes to study at the academy, he immediately begins with a visit to the military history hall, where he is told what... how it happened, why he should do this, and his learning process ends in the fourth year, also from this hall of military history, when he is done, and he walks through this hall himself and already talks... about this history, with specific examples and that’s all. why? because a warrior who knows his history, who knows the exploits of his people, this is fearless, and this warrior who cannot be broken. and we lay this as the basis for training. our cadets in 1920 all stood in the square, but they stood with the goal of defending their state, realizing that this state

today stands on their shoulders. i remember the eyes of our teachers, yes, we scolded them somewhere, yes. we said somewhere that they were bad somewhere, somewhere else, and so on and so forth, but what we saw in the twentieth year struck us to the core, i realized that we could not be defeated, i these i remember the eyes of these guys before end, i was then the head of the department of tactics, i said, maybe somewhere i violated some pedagogical forms, i said everything, to everyone who was one point higher there, definitely, and i’m probably proud of it, thank you, - in my opinion, more than exhausted, and we can add more, and the most important thing today we are talking about is that...

studying abroad, somewhere else, the head of state has set the right, correct, set targets, i remind you once again, that the learning process, the educational process, does not include itself only training, but education, we want our guys, our people to be raised abroad, a foreign uncle, well, probably not, so what is wrong with the head of state here, well, i don’t know, in my opinion, all the words were on point . it’s easy to explore belarus, all you have to do is create a non-trivial route, adventures await us today, but in general horses love it when they are looked after, stroked and brushed there,

the horse has no hands, no fingers, she can’t scratch herself, to scratch herself she needs to go somewhere - to swing in the sand, in the snow. the most the main thing is to be open to amazing secrets and facts. i’m putting the question to a vote: who is in favor of accepting the hero maria ivanovna as a member of the komsomol? please vote, who is in favor? and don’t forget to give free rein to positive emotions. let's take our time. it's just a delight. this is the first. what's this? bowl, what? watch the project route we will build on the belarus 24 tv channel. god gave wings to some, and a kickback to others, yes, it seems like both are flying, but what different trajectories,

perspective, 34 trillion, the us national debt mark has been reached, they live.

let's move on, a big topic that couldn't not to notice this week, a special date and process,

plus crimea was the majority there, they understood that they would elect a president in ukraine who would more or less protect their rights. when they return there without crimea, they find themselves in the minority, and absolutely any discriminatory laws could be passed against donbass, there on language on other issues, they did not want to go back there initially, and this was the main difficulty that appeared immediately from the start in these minsk agreements, but then ukraine began build fortified areas there right away, literally from the start, that is, they were preparing for, well, if not for defense, then at least some kind of operation that could there, as they said at...

the change of power in kiev, but it turned out

here are operations, a small one there, 2 weeks, for example, they also say that we were talking about a short , protracted war, which had to rebuild the economy for another whole year, which means that, after all, they weren’t ready then, now they weren’t quite ready either, and why, well, they say that because of gas, that is, a gas pipeline was built nord stream 2 with germany, putin has been trying it feverishly for these 8 years. build, let's, let's put it into operation, already, 95%, 97, 98 are already there, and at the very end of the construction of the gas pipeline, a military operation began, that is, until the very end they tried to come to an agreement with the germans, the americans tried to disrupt all this, so all this has created such a gray zone for 8 years, it’s unclear why, which , well, it seems we want it there, it seems we don’t recognize it, russia, let’s say, did not take them into the russian federation for a very long time, that is, it’s all like that it was, well, yes, we seem to be holding negotiations, yes, we are your allies, but not officially, it’s a very difficult question, what will it look like in 50 years? i was sitting right now, listening to andrey, thinking about this at the same time, uh, everything will probably depend on what the next 5-10 years will be like there, that is, who will win in this battle for consciousness,

who will take what position in new world, that is, this could be a version of the pico treaty on the division of africa, which will be neatly shoved under the rug of history, will not they will remember and talk about the right of a nation to self-determination, this could be... in 50 years it will be perceived there as another munich agreement, that we were irreconcilable opponents trying to really gain time in order to deliver a decisive blow, this can be considered as an act or pact there pilsudski hitler, who simply brought directly, or rather his failure to comply, said this, by the way, putin in an interview with tucker carlos directly led to the beginning of... unfortunately, a world war, i really wouldn’t want this to be the last option, rather, i think, at least in belarusian history, this will remain a very

high point of our diplomacy, when we really, we as belarusians, our president, our diplomacy, did everything in our power so as not to abandon our two native peoples , russians, ukrainians, into a war, essentially a civil war, let 's not... find materials about it, who remembers françois hollande today, who is it? after 50 years, today these faces, these names have already

been erased, which is complete. the world, and it will always be so, and in 50 years, and in 100 years, this is our formula, it will always remain, an interesting moment was in the sensational interview between tucker carlson and vladimir putin, and there it is now obvious to everyone that in ukraine russia is not fighting with kiev in the first place, this russian president is at some point i touched on this topic, but how could it have been why it didn’t happen, let’s listen, i don’t understand why

american soldiers should fight in ukraine. thousands of kilometers from the national territory, you have nothing to do, you have a lot of problems at the border, problems with migration, problems with an external government debt of more than 30 trillion dollars, there is nothing to do, we need to fight in ukraine, but wouldn’t it be better to come to an agreement with russia, to come to an agreement already understanding, understanding the situation that is developing today, understanding

that russia will fight. question, and the reaction, which, i think , has been consistently answered in detail in this interview, it will still surprise us very much in the future, whether the russians want war, is well formulated, even aristovich answers this question, says, that a terrible thought came into his head and he couldn’t keep it in his head, let’s

listen very briefly.

there are also these important messages: first: ukraine has no subjectivity, there can no longer be any conversation with it. second, europe, these are the ones.

mongolia, a former minister, is already drawing some new maps there, sending them to putin for some reason, well, people, well, you understand what the meaning of this whole story is about, it was presented , we know, by some lost minister , so that’s this whole land, this people, it is one for us, it’s all part of our history, and this is our land, by the way, zelensky confirmed this, confirmed it not just with words, but with a decree, but about what, about the subjects of the russian federation, where they are, eight subjects of the russian federation. almost included in the composition of ukraine, and what with this, i give a standing ovation, who suggested this to him, it turns out that we have a common people and a common territory, hallelujah, they legitimized everything with this decree, everything that vladimir has been talking about all this time vladimirovich

putin, so i want to say, the rant corporation is a very serious corporation, and i i want to say, you probably should always listen to her, do the russians want war, of course not, the message to trump is clearly a message that... of course, this conflict needs to be stopped, heard, andrey, i interrupted you then, if what , what to add to this, well, look, according to the rent - this is exactly a factory, which is not like you and me, but sits and discusses what will happen next, there are very large mathematical models, so they calculate exactly the combat operations, by the way, few people does this, even in the west, artificial intelligence works for them around the end of not even last year, it turns out, it was about a year and a half ago, they gave another report on the counter-offensive, on the possible development of events, it said that either they were leaving... the crimean border - that’s the maximum, what there may be a threshold, or there will be nothing at all, nevertheless, this zaluzhny syrsky was driven there to be slaughtered, that is, in principle , they, even understanding the ceiling of ukraine’s capabilities, they still carry out these military operations and continue them, which means that we are talking about that the conflict must first be sponsored,

to master some money, and this is the task of the thought factory, that is, here we give you four scenarios, here you will spend so many billions, here so many, so many, please choose what you want, that is, they accompany those government decisions that are made, well, in this case , by the democrats, but what about the attacker? who came to putin, in fact this is considered, so trump spoke through an intermediary with vladimir vladimirovich, the main question there was, i think, whether you have enough territory, this is how he asked putin directly, what this says that if you and i freeze the conflict along the current front line, then can we further agree, you know, it seems like yes, putin replied that if nazi groups are banned in ukraine, if we sign a peace agreement, if you stop supplies, then yes, we will agree on the border that exists, but our trump, even if he wins only in a year, maybe at the end of january. he will have his inauguration, during which time the front could be anywhere, because his supplies there today are lame, and look at how russia is gradually advancing in the same ovdeevka, there other corprains who have been storming for 3 years have now just begun to be taken, that is, in new territories, if the front stops, it is not a fact that trump will recognize all this, he is

only satisfied with that small the piece that we have today is the maximum that the americans can, as it were, give us, so we also shouldn’t have the illusion that we will agree specifically on our terms, let’s still not glorify america, let’s not reduce it.

china fully understands this, does india, vietnam, indonesia, that is, those countries that today occupy a neutral position, because we are talking about the fact that we have entered a stage of transformation. profile andrey evgenievich, tucker’s interview, as a verdict , in general, on the concept of freedom of speech, because elon musk was outraged by the information published on the social network x that, by order of us president joe biden, facebook limited the dissemination of an interview with the russian president on its platform vladimir putin. this is an insane level of censorship - reacted like this elon musk. and look, in their own country they have turned censorship to full, but the whole world, out of habit, continues to teach freedom.

here is a very interesting case, look, they recently tried kyrgyzstan, they decided to restore order with numerous foreign ngos and ngos, now the country is working on a corresponding law, the purpose of which is simple: comply with the constitution, pay taxes, without threatening sovereignty in general everything seems to be a purely internal story, but suddenly the president of kyrgyzstan receives a letter from us secretary of state blinken, who dissatisfied with the law, starts an old record about democracy, so... my only request: do not interfere in

the internal affairs of our country. this is horror, andrei evgenievich, what kind of journalism and freedom of speech does this smell like? yes, there is no journalism, there remains hypocrisy , there remains propaganda, there remains the pulling of the media community to one side or another, unfortunately, in the united states this is the case, and you remember, at that time the then -current president trump was blocked, cut out of the airwaves, shut up. i'm guessing those same digital ones corporations, the world is slowly starting to cut itself off, the fight against this is crooked, not very effective, well, look, just these days the package of eu laws on digital markets and digital services is finally coming into force, what is said there, so if that’s all, well, putting mishra aside , it is said that digital corporations, those very meta ones, facebook, that is, those who either open the door for you to a new digital world

of good services, communications, freedoms, pluralism of opinions, or keep you there in a septic tank on the threshold, not allowing you to do this, secondly, which is also in the european union model law, which comes into force these days about...

it is not obvious where this country has such a large sector of these non-governmental organizations, but the fact is that the basis of the economy of kyrgyzstan is the large kumtur gold mine, until that moment it was privately owned by western companies, with part of this profit that left the country, they created that very ngo sector, which was the most developed in our cis, this is surprising, yes, small country, yes, but the new government of kyrgyzstan nationalized the mine, and today, of course, everything that is there is being raised against them against them, all the clans, all the ngos, all these informal connections that are among them. because

everything is fine with your democracy, there’s just some point in the economy that you don’t control, from this point comes the financing of this kind of polyps that are growing in your state, that is, they are trying to do this, of course, to secure it, but the task is to control the mine if they can continue to maintain control for 2 years already control, then i think everything will be fine there, and if not, then they will be demolished by another color revolution with the help of ngos. let's say that this is not the first letter that came from the united states, before this came menes, robert manos, a congressman, sent a similar letter, also to sadyr.

in kazakhstan, today there is interaction between russia and china in many of these issues, today there is also the shanghai organization that we are talking about, where the issues are specifically related to counteraction. including extremism, terrorism and everything else, today we clearly see, through the example of the actions of the president of kyrgyzstan, how this region is beginning to move away from the global agenda to the bloc agenda, where today another force appears that can resist, but on this i think,

everything is not yet in kyrgyzstan will end, that's right, let's get used to it for a while, after which there is another very important topic that we simply have no right to ignore today, so stay with us. we continue to need to close this topic, which is in the first block, it’s stuck with us and requires a logical conclusion, as it seems to me, the american political model is rapidly deteriorating, well, this is the only case where joe biden looks organic, describing the current head of the white house, they don’t really choose words there, so a political observer names joe is a decrepit vegetable from the white house. trump announced his rival at all, i don’t think he knows that he’s alive, especially since biden himself regularly throws up reasons to doubt his suitability for the profession, here he is again produces some set of words instead of a related sentence. in general, the problem

is serious for americans, because more than 80% of americans believe that biden is too much. start for another presidential term , reports abc news, well, here it is, us vice president kamala haris , against the backdrop of voters' concerns about biden's age, said she was ready to serve, if anything happens, writes the wall street journal, olga igorevna, after all, biden - still in the presidential race, the question arises what the elder is preparing for, because it smells like something ritualistic, that it’s not just that they’re dragging him out, they’re just pushing him to...

behind this dead person there are at least two candidates ready to replace him, they just don’t rise up in the light of god in order

to god can’t spoil the election results with his reputation, so from the point of view of the american electoral system , it’s normal that even a dead man will be elected. andreich, it seems you have something to add, well, i’ll say that the democrats, they are working harder in terms of changing their electoral base, so this crazy importation of migrants that is happening will lead to the fact that the democratic party will be able to choose any candidate, even a dead person, a dead person, a living person, a child of a pensioner, they will simply have more of this electorate than the republicans, because the migrant who comes to the states , he then votes for the democratic party, and today they have, in principle, parity against the republicans, that is, if earlier there were still 3-4 states that determined the result, then today we are talking about the fact that, in principle, the democratic party is electoral preferences should, in principle, win , it’s just that trump is very bright, if it were some less bright candidate, he would have a much lower rating and a definitely naive question, but he still asks to join... there are a lot of not stupid people in america people who understand this no worse than you and i, is the situation with democracy there really so bad

that these, including very influential people, smart people, well, we see, we watch them, cannot influence at all, yes, so that this biden can live out his life century in this position , so that migrants are driven in this way in order to catch up with the electoral mass, they cannot do anything, well, you know, trump, when he speaks, yes, he has a very clear, very short speech at rallies, and he does not rely on ... trump is supported, at the top this support is falling all the time, that’s why it’s so difficult, america is a country of shows, a country of wonderful hollywood films, everything,

as they say, should be appropriate, i agree with all my colleagues who are here now they said just about biden, well, i’ll add a little more of my version that maybe, again, everything should be beautiful in america, even tragedy should be beautiful, so i think that the departure of the hegemony of the united states from the world stage... afghanistan did it proudly, with unfurled banners, having fully fulfilled their duty, leaving behind built roads,

factories, power plants, hospitals, residential neighborhoods, let us remember how they scuttled, there is no other word for the americans from kabul in august 2021, leaving behind a destroyed a country with drug trafficking as the main source of its economy. in the nineties they tried to tell us what our officers and soldiers carried to afghanistan. death and destruction, americans freedom and democracy, well, complete nonsense, it is quite obvious today, it is noteworthy that in afghanistan itself the people still keep a good memory of shuravi, here is andrei petrovich, today 35 years after the withdrawal of troops from afghanistan, when, well the dust of the collapsed union has shaken off the political patina a little, this is a memory for us, this is the first turn, well, afghanistan is, first of all , our history, our pain, our... natives of belarus fought in afghanistan, 771 did not

return from there, 12 went missing, one and a half, more than one and a half thousand people were injured, many of them, some of them remained disabled, but exactly what these people did in their time, it, of course, during the period of perestroika against the backdrop of the decline of the soviet union, it was not reflected. the debt that we must pay to these people, it certainly must be, we all owe it to him. just look at the background of what events the international duty was being fulfilled; it was the height of the cold war ; i think that today it is no longer a secret to anyone that major political and geopolitical tasks were being solved. what they told us, if we don’t send our troops there, the americans will end up there, turned out to be true. it later happened like this, but only two approaches, you said correctly, one built, created and created

conditions for people, the second, well, what grew up there? i even got to the point where i gave order and sent them on a day off, because people still give all of themselves in order to teach and pass on this experience. i want to say that the events that took place in afghanistan still in many ways need to be rethought by us, rethought specifically for interaction with

the same afghanistan. and our president’s trip to uzbekistan. and the fact that we have prospects for interaction with afghanistan must, without a doubt, be taken into account, including with the experience that i left behind the soviet union and what the americans left behind, the next day literally the system that was created, it collapsed, it resisted and fought against jebullah until 1996, can you imagine what the soviet union left behind there, what we left behind there, these people need , of course, bow down to the ground.

who spoke about peace, about the need to withdraw soviet troops as soon as possible, they were the first to call for a bloody massacre, then on the territory of the former soviet union, education, because there on these armored personnel carriers under it was the last generation of boys who came out with red banners, who received an excellent soviet education and absorbed patriotism, they fought there, and the outgoing biden empire, well, unfortunately, under these red banners... the soviet union also passed away, like a great soviet state, it was such a vivid symbol, a vivid image of this departure, but i absolutely agree that there is hope in this topic, in this thirty-fifth anniversary, since these people, having returned to their states, in this case to our state, to the republic of belarus is, in fact , the backbone, the skeleton, the backbone

of patriotic education and security.

are also guilty, i think, of something, olga ievna, i think that memory is in these events, for me it is on two levels, i will say, probably, as a woman, the only one here, these events are the death of my husband, brother , son, father, and 5 years have passed, 35, 100 years does not matter to us, absolutely, well , second, i would say briefly, as soon as

missionaries come to us, we need to uncover the guns, in this studio in order to judge new events, new news, new meanings. thank you for being with us, see you in a week, happily. in all international acts, it is written in black and white that the murder of civilians, unarmed people, and children is a war crime. but the head of european diplomacy, josep barel, commenting on the situation in the palestinian-israeli conflict zone, said that he considers it pointless to provide humanitarian assistance to those who could be killed tomorrow, but this is

different. almost 3 months of bombing of civilian areas and infrastructure almost 22,000 residents of the gas sector were killed, the number of wounded exceeded the figure of 56. as for the shelling of donetsk on new year’s eve in belgorod, this is a violation of humanitarian law, a violation of the rules of war. this is a war crime. in the meantime, the west is already dividing the remains of ukraine. don't wait until the end of a special military operation. the latter is basically no longer interesting to them. the author's project of ksenia lebedeva is different. watch new episodes on belarus 20 tv channel.