for us, the time is not easy ahead, therefore , in addition to professionalism, there must also be reliability, devotion to the belarusian people , to aggravate, i personally am very glad that the word patriotism was not mentioned in the answer, despite the fact that i am categorically for patriotism, for love of the motherland for that that any country needs patriots, this goes without saying, but let’s also use an example: when i undergo surgery, what is primary for me, the patriotism of the surgeon or his professionalism, or if... i’m going in a taxi, what is more important to me? does the driver support the state course of the current government or whether he follows traffic rules, and whether he is able to react to a kamaz flying towards him, and so on. i agree, the ideal combination is a professional patriot or a patriotic professional. but if a person is a professional, but not a patriot, he can of course do bad things for the country and its citizens, but this will be his personal choice, that is, there will be a motive. that is

, its nastiness is theoretically predictable, which means it can be somehow preventive liquidated, but a very charged patriot who sincerely wants to do something very good for his homeland, but is not a professional, that is, he does not understand how exactly to do good for his homeland, so in my opinion he is much more dangerous, because he is unpredictable. for some reason, we sometimes often hear the word patriotism as the dominant requirement in order to get into parliament, local councils, the supreme national assembly, the executive branch, and so on, but it seems to me that professionalism should prevail over everything else, i repeat, an ideal combination, yes, this is a professional patriot or a patriotic professional , but parliament is not a republican union of patriots, although such unions are, of course, important and necessary, parliament is a professional body for making important government decisions, but for now someone is already on me swears at the screen.

dictator lukashenko knows about this, probably knows their last names, is sure that he can get direct quotes from the dissatisfaction of these officials, including in their personal conversations with each other, or, say, in a conversation with his wife in the kitchen, but the officials, who don’t like lukashenko because he harshly asks for results , they continue to be officials, not only does no one imprison them for 15 days so that they are happy with everything, but they are not even fired from their bureaucratic work, and there are reasons ...

to believe that they can even receive a promotion agreed upon personally with the president, who, let me remind you, does not like him for his toughness, and he knows this for sure, but still promotes them, how is that possible? i think because, especially in the system of the executive power, professionalism is primary, everything the rest is, at best, in second place, and if someone doesn’t like something , someone has a different opinion, well, time puts everything in its place, alternative oil at the end of 2019, friction with moscow, no coronavirus lockdown, no excessive tenderness with the protesters in august 1920, counter-sanctions, support for russia in the northern military district, and so on. each such strong decision of the president, of which there were many, is not initially supported by all of his supporters automatically and with cries of “hurray.” but time passes, and even those supporters who were against understand that he was right and not wrong, that is, people and even officials can make mistakes and change their minds, but if they remain

professionals for any reason, then the public administration system continues to work stably , the president, in order to lead the nation into an unconditionally successful future, needs professionals who can help implement his strong decision of patriotism alone is not enough, to put it mildly, patriotism towards the current government is generally an extremely fickle substance, so to understand this, it’s enough to at least not forget the history of at least the soviet union and early russia, patriotism to power is just... like it or not, but what ’s amazing about our president is that he doesn’t try to be liked primarily, he works so that we like his decisions and the result of his work. this is my job, to sit, think using experience and my knowledge, i must predict, if the president does not have this, there is no point in doing this, this is the main quality of the president, well, naturally, i must to have iron intuition, and most importantly, you always... must remember where you came from,

be an earthly person, remember that 10 million people and three million who come here to relax and so on, these are the people to whom you owe. you owe them, well , they also owe me something, and let me tell you how, in my opinion, the president himself is evolving, at least this is how i see it, i have had several images of the head of state in my life, the first - this is the image of lukashenko, formed in my distant youth, when i was far from political journalism and propaganda, like to the moon and back, this image, naturally, was formed on the basis of scraps of information, this is what modern youth on ...

will notice so that the system that he is building works more and more efficiently, and for this yes, strong decisions were needed, the question is not danchenko, the question is that all officials understand that the presence of a result will give even greater responsibility, but the absence of a result threatens restrictions, not only of responsibility, but of a lot of things in general. in 2017 i started working at presidential pool, that is, listen to everything that alexander grigorievich says publicly, although i started doing this before the pool. listen to something even inappropriate, i was waiting to see lukashenko just like this, with that strict dichotomy of good and evil, which, by the way, i personally really like: you are either a deputy prime minister, or we will put you in prison, but i saw another, a second for lukashenko, because there seems to be no need for such cruelty, and there were some legendary

cases when officials left a meeting to not so distant places, which my senior colleagues told me a lot about, they weren’t even there when i was in pulov, the head of state after the initial... settings of the system after its evolution changed himself, he rather began to tell his strategic plan, explain why he was taking this is exactly the decision, then ask for the result, if there was no result, he did not chop everyone involved into cabbage with a saber, he either explained it to them again or made a personal decision so that this result would appear, that is i didn’t do everything, but i did a lot because of them, and it all worked well for the time being, because there were external threats, a system that worked well under... lukashenko, who single-handedly decides any issues, from strategic to the most distant farms, the system began to lose efficiency, because there were somehow a lot more strategic issues, and alexander grigorievich evolved into a strategist who redistributes part

of his power, until recently limitless, along with responsibility, until recently such same unlimited, system of government, that is, to redistribute their power to other people for... which he, allegedly, as his opponents assure, holds tightly, and demands what was possible, it was difficult to imagine 10-15 years ago, independent decisions on important issues without the participation of the president, this is the third image for me of the president, with whom i do not work every day, but often, he changes based on what will be best for the country in its system of governance, and then demands the same changes from the entire system of government , can lukashenko wave sword and, say, send someone to prison today? to sum up, is lukashenko a strong person? i’m not talking about physical strength, but about character, well, in both cases, yes, of course, can he continue to be a strong president, one who would be respected, and

what are they afraid of? i don’t have any doubts he can, but it seems to me that the president’s goal is not just to remain a strong leader of belarus, but to make belarus just as strong. give strength to your country so that it itself can demonstrate it for the sake of its bright future, and give this strength in time, because the time is coming, the current world is strength, i only understand strength, if, forgive me, we let go and fight for democracy and some ephemeral freedom, you saw, there are no such freedoms, no democracy, no, are we already strong, i i think that we have become stronger, but this process is far from complete, but we are evolving, and this is important, because no strong people will allow a weak person to come to power at home, only strong hands can retain power, and lukashenko will leave only after he will be convinced that the country now has this power, and even without him, the president

will consider any other outcome a betrayal of the country’s people, and betrayal for alexander grigorievich, i dare say, is the worst sin. my name is igor tur, this was my propaganda. review of the most important sporting events. perhaps the next sharangovich will soon be born here. loud statements accompanied the opening of the forty-sixth ice rink in belarus. we are confident that future hockey champions will grow here. exclusive interviews with athletes. and if previously, the national teams were predominantly represented by children from minsk schools, but now we are already seeing how children from the regions are beginning to dominate. bright moments , real emotions. i came myself. the preparation strategy, i’m preparing for it, i

’m really happy, i have such an olympic games, probably it’s even the athlete’s duty to believe in it and prepare. all this is in sports projects on the belarus24 tv channel.