here you feel, well, family, we , of course, have a team, one that our country should be proud of, innovators and innovators, scientific and technical developments and innovative breakthroughs, modernization of production and high quality here now, this is the everyday life of the famous integral, constant development of team competencies and thoughtful social policy, the secret of success of a unique belarusian enterprise in the microelectronics industry, joy for the soul and mind. this is a significant part of my life, this is probably

hello, welcome to everyone who is with us now. well, the first most important stage in the big electoral process has been completed, elections to parliament and local councils have taken place, marina aleksandrovna, alex sergeevich, vyacheslav viktorovich, these are also your personal achievements, but i know, i ’m kind of happy for you, but with on the other hand, i am in no hurry to joyfully congratulate you, for the simple reason that there are very serious tasks ahead, times are extremely difficult, i assume that when you went to parliament 5 years ago, you could somehow imagine how everything will be when the deadline expires.

i open, i want to work even better, because i think about what in 5 years and in 10, because i want to always be useful to this country, so i work. vyacheslav viktorovich, what are you tuning in to? well, of course, for me, of course, on the one hand, this is a feeling of joy, on the other hand, a sense of responsibility, a very important, responsible stage of activity begins, during which a lot has to be done to maintain peace in the world, improve the lives of our citizens in in general for the successful development of our state, so of course it’s big.

and develop further , and it turns out interesting that the calmer our elections, the more irritated the enemy, of course, this means that we need to prepare for the fact that they will somehow try to take revenge, well, of course, that means... we are determined these western centers of power are aimed at shaking up as many countries and states as possible, especially along the perimeter of the russian federation, given that we have a union state with the russian the federation, in belarus, this is the preservation of peace in the world, it’s like an eyesore for these western tycoons, then this is not an exaggeration, of course, i believe that this is absolutely true, this is, unfortunately , the geopolitical situation oleg sergeevich, as an experienced politician, i want to ask you, because it’s clear that when high-level leaders make some statements, it’s important how they say and what they say and... almost a set of words, because here every shade matters, the president speaks to reporters in sunday at the polling station, when he was asked about the upcoming presidential elections, he said tell them that i’m coming, this is also a factor of stabilization, of course, i ’ll tell you that the reaction to this speech

by the president was colossal, we saw it everywhere, in every region, in social networks, abroad, and the reaction is absolutely diametrically opposite, if inside. most belarusians sighed calmly, why? because the political system is being restructured today, and every belarusian understands this, it is following an evolutionary path, yes, but there are still risks there is also transformation, and the worst thing for any belarusian, that’s why the elections went well, that we woke up in the same country, the worst thing is to wake up after the elections in some other country, everything is destroyed, everything is done again, some populist standing there, telling us, we will soon come to a bright future, and... many generations still remember this gorbachev and yeltsin, this is the first reaction, inside the country, people breathed a sigh of relief, but our enemies abroad, they too died , just a sigh of sadness, because this does not mean that there is no rocking there will be, they just understand perfectly well

that in the scenario that the president voiced, it will be much more difficult to shake things up, that is , look, lukashenko has not even said it in one word, in one sentence.

sweden to nato, there were open statements that we would take kaliningrad, i’ll quote, i’ll just add, you continue, the lithuanian ambassador to sweden, the former minister of foreign affairs. he really says so, he calls it the neutralization of kaliningrad, he writes: after sweden joined the alliance, the baltic sea has become internal to nato, if russia dares to challenge the north atlantic alliance, kaliningrad will be neutralized first, and note that these are the major exercises that began in february of this year, which brings together a huge group of nato forces at the beginning.

preparation for an offensive operation, including remember that the topic of expanding the suwalki corridor was discussed more than once, expansion, it is clear that at the expense of our territory, that is, it is just within the borders of grodno and ivya, but for them the most dangerous thing, of course, they openly discuss this, this is the presence on our territory of tactical nuclear weapons, multiple launch rocket systems that have... a large range, look, the minister of defense answers in an interview

with the russia-24 tv channel, viktor khrenin, says: “we we won’t stand on ceremony.” here are two short quotes: ukraine has turned its border region into a fortified area, has concentrated an attack force of 112-114 thousand people on the border with belarus, and sabotage groups are being sent from ukraine. and this: the armed forces of belarus are fully prepared for the development of any situation. region, for this we have a well-trained army, equipped with the most modern types of weapons, including nuclear weapons. oleg sergeevich, look, after all, in essence, what is this if not a call for prudence, but they still behave like immortals, i don’t know, well, look, it means that nato has another goal, i agree with alexey, but there is also one global goal is to continue to weaken the european union, they are doing this very well, they they started a war in ukraine and are collecting the cream. in the form of arms sales, at this time europe suffers from economic sanctions and suffers

the most, as it suffered before when the americans invaded the middle east, europe received migrants, the americans received oil. what will happen next? they are increasing their power, they are telling, as always, the most aggressive rhetoric is from our baltic neighbors, who shout more than they can do anything, because they don’t have a damn thing and won’t, but there is one truth, first, no attack on russia. belarus there will not be a full-scale conflict as long as we have a stable internal political situation in russia belarus, this is impossible, there will be nothing in direct clashes, why is one sarmatian missile, one example, you don’t even have to go far, one sarmatian missile with a nuclear charge is amazing the entire territory of france, this is about comrade macron, who says a lot , further means further, that is , there will be no direct clash, everyone will be destroyed, and our minister of defense is very tactful, hints at this diplomatically. that if someone thinks that someone will stand on ceremony with these tank divisions standing on the border with belarus from poland, then

there will be no such war, this is not the northern military district, by the way, russian president putin subtly hinted about this, said, in the event of an attack on belarus, it would be tantamount to an attack on russia and a full-scale war, in which nato has no chance, if there were chances, they attacked a long time ago, but the risks are great for one simple reason, they will invest every year. dependence of belarus on russia, and this would be occupation of our country and war. the people

would not have accepted this, they would have gone into the forests , a guerrilla war would have started, we would have fought, and this would have been the plan of the west: to get us into a war, that’s what we are fighting for today, let’s look at another topic, it’s close to that , what we are talking about, now in paris they discussed the fate of ukraine, at which macron, who until recently considered himself almost the main peacemaker in europe, announced the creation of a coalition to supply kiev with long-range weapons. we are talking, as he said, about deep strikes with medium and long-range missiles and bombs actions, that is, attacks on russian territory. russia should not and cannot win, ” macron concluded. this resonated even with individual meeting participants. slovak prime minister robert fitzer said this: there was not a single word about peace. moreover, fitze said that there are already several countries that are ready to send their own soldiers to ukraine, although many immediately denied this. nato general secretary stoltenberg has so far stated that the alliance has no plan to send its military to ukraine. who to believe in

this case, macron or stoltenberg? well here you have to believe not in words, but in deeds, i think. on the other hand, the complication means the situation in some way of the russian federation, and by involving these countries, there may be some kind of military conflicts, the transfer of weapons, this is what macron is talking about, this all goes in line with overseas interests, which means that they are promoted by the united states america, trying to preserve this unfair unipolar world order, we must be clearly aware of this, but what do you think, this

is the reaction of germany, other countries, including stoltenberg, who say: “no, no, no, we are not going to get along.”

a few words about those nato plans that were still discussed at the beginning of 2010, that is, we very clearly see that nato at some stage decided, so they decided to take the black sea from the russian federation and take the baltic sea, they discussed this back in 2010, and it was just some theory or some. discussion, but now the situation after the start of the northern military district has not turned in their direction, that is, they did not capture the black sea, as they planned, they didn’t get crimea, and russia wasn’t cut off from the black sea coast, and now, through drawing finland and sweden into nato, they are actually trying to take revenge,

revenge for the black sea, taking away the baltic sea, but we have more than once... already in our programs they said where this ideology comes from, remember, in 1828, colonel lasley evans, a british, wrote the book “transformation of russia”, in this book he already wrote: “in order to deprive the russian empire of the status of a world power, it is necessary to cut it off from seas." why? because the sea is a continuation of trade routes. moreover, in this book he wrote that it is imperative to bomb krasnstatt and...

that the topic of sending military personnel to ukraine was discussed in europe, i will quote the press secretary of the russian president peskov : if this happens, then we will have to talk not about the probability, but about the inevitability of a direct clash between russia and nato, that is , a signal was also sent, naturally, you know, i also looked at the comments that medvedev gave, he called these statements macron, uncontrolled enuresis , verbal, well, probably yes...

a world war, unfortunately, there will be no winners, but within the political forces, they are furious with the statement, so i will now quote a french politician and journalist, an influential person in france, jean luc milanchon, he says so: sending troops to ukraine will make us a warring country, a war with russia would be madness, this belligerent verbal escalation of one nuclear power against another major nuclear power is an irresponsible act, concludes that parliament must say no, of course. the time has come to agree on peace in ukraine with mutual security conditions, macron just doesn’t hear them, doesn’t hear them, because he’s a populist, and even this statement of his, it’s like, you know, he wants

to pull back the blanket of himself and become such a mainstream politician in europe, but he’s a populist , you understand, in any case, of course, he needs to solve internal problems, there are plenty of them there, except for migrants, the problem with farmers, these yellow vests, but listen.

every meeting, every speech, begins with sovereignty ends with sovereignty. if you are not sovereign, you will fight, if you are not sovereign, you

will be robbed, if you are not sovereign, you will kneel and pray. now to ukraine, look how interesting it turns out, this is connected with what we are discussing now, and about well, the word sovereignty can no longer be applied to ukraine. unfortunately, that’s why we need to look for some other synonym, they have 5 years of zelensky’s presidential term expiring in may, one of the main issues that is inside ukraine is being discussed, this is an issue with zelensky’s legitimacy, it’s kind of like martial law, and it can be extended automatically, but not everyone is happy with this option, now a ukrainian political strategist, he concludes that there is a reputational catastrophe for zelensky, the ratings are catastrophic.

this certainly suggests that , unfortunately, ukraine is approaching the line beyond which it can simply be liquidated as a state, and those ruling elites who are at the head, yes, that means, who actually led the country to a situation that today there is, they are naturally responsible for this, and i think that on the one hand, people, despite all the propaganda that has been deployed there, they see the results of what is happening, but in fact it turns out that it is going on again, which means the ukrainian counter-offensive is not succeeded, the russian offensive. the search for advancement is carried out, there are no victories, which means that the situation in the country is very difficult, the collapse is in fact and the leader who is at the head of the state, i don’t know what he can count on, that means, on the support of some

external forces. on the other hand, external forces, the same americans, the british , are obviously, probably, interested in the possible change of the leader of ukraine, to install someone more beneficial to them, who will have more, perhaps some kind of authority, not so lost, yes in the eyes of their own people, therefore, here , of course, this is a sad result of the long-term policy that the ruling ukrainian elites pursued, when they actually began by splitting their people into two parts, supposedly there are, which means some are more correct... others, who in the east are not quite normal, correct citizens, split their country, plunged it into a military conflict, which means, in fact, resources, the richest country ukraine, this is the richest breadbasket of the soviet union, once was, in the end it turns out that it has come to its collapse, and in fact suffers this catastrophe of statehood, what we have today, in your opinion, is a question of legitimacy, how far it will go, whether this threatens zelensky, well, certainly from my point of view his vision is threatened, quite possibly, this means

his loss of power. this means his sad end may even be complete, which means with life he may have known too much, what is happening in ukraine is again sovereignty, and this sovereignty has been lost since the ninety-first year, every year one step at a time, today we have arrived at the situation when zelensky's rating, the population's trust, distrust of him does not affect anything in the fate of ukraine, because it is under complete external control, if zelensky has a rating of zero tomorrow, but biden. will decide and the white house that he still needs to lead ukraine, he will lead ukraine if he has a rating of 50%, figuratively speaking, or 40, but biden will also decide the white house that it’s time to remove it and change it to a more convenient candidate, which will, as it were, give a new breath of war, then they will do it, that’s the problem, it’s interesting that people, look how interesting it is, in 2004, in 2014, the osce

applauded in ukraine.

kiev is a russian city, and from there comes a threat to the existence of the russian federation, an international threat, because at least kiev is a city with russian roots; it is controlled by an international brigade of opponents of russia, led by the united states of america. there is such an opinion too. we understand that the decision-making center

is not kiev. a few years ago, the president said: “sit down at the negotiating table, sit down at the negotiating table.” why? the outcome is inevitable. the question is how much time will pass and how many people will die. well, this is now obvious to everyone. now, if the negotiations had gone well at the beginning of the northern military district, well, that would have been

a completely different situation. no matter how many people were kept alive, but today we see how many lie in graves, that’s what’s scary. and today the president again tells them, if now... and what else will happen to those who are now sitting at the bank and making these decisions? russia still has 30% of the weapons

it has not used. because we can now perfectly compare how the united states acts in the middle east, simply wiping cities off the face of the earth, and how russia acts? alexey, yes, here. probably for comprehensive understanding by our viewers of the situation that is now developing in ukraine in europe itself, we must understand that the west hoped that with such cunning maneuvers, since the twentieth year, maneuvers regarding belarus, an attempt to seize power here, then maneuvers to seize the black sea region , they will be able to achieve theirs. these are the historical goals that everyone has been trying to realize for the last, probably 200-250 years, but having started this campaign, they themselves eventually came to a dead end, they realized that they did not have enough resources, they

faced with a huge, not just a machine, but a makina in the form of the russian federation, including allies, it must be said that there are allies, and the west was faced. with the fact that he does not control the whole world, and the whole world is not subordinate to them, and this is the biggest shock for them. naturally, in these situations they have only one scenario: to further escalate the situation , they are already going all-in, in fact, they will either lose or at least win something, but within these elites, the statements that we see, there is definitely an understanding that what if they take another step, such a strategic one, negatively towards russia, then this could end, of course, not, not just in the repartition of ukraine, but in the repartition of all of europe, including, the most important thing to understand, and this is what british analysts say , that it is possible that britain

will no longer exist in some format, because the main threat over the past 300 years to the russian empire has come from great britain. there are two very important topics that we all need to focus on today. attention, stay with us, we will bring you closer viewer to science, how science, and specifically biotechnology, helps turn grain into gold, the product from which amino acids are made, this is our glucose syrup, which bacteria eat and produce amino acids, if so. it’s very easy to say, it’s very simple and the most important thing is that it’s clear, we’ll tell you how talented scientists have changed our lives, we, as scientists , are cautious in forecasts, but having delved into the essence, we do not rule out that in the near future many people will talk about agronomics, the project

us about agriculture, well, accordingly agro, then after all, we are more about the economy, so agronomics, that is, a hint of agriculture, since the project should help increase profitability.

we discussed the challenges in the first part of the program, today they are common between belarus and russia, and we have recently united powerfully; it is unlikely that it will be possible to break up the union from the outside, but they will try from the inside, for example, through the topic of an imaginary takeover, there are provinces, and so on. so on, it would seem that after the twenty-second year the topic is generally irrelevant, but periodically in strange articles appear in the russian media, by the way, on sunday journalists ask whether alexander lukashenko is also a union

state. what is wrong? i see how my colleagues, this does not concern president putin, two or three others, maybe even the military, this does not concern, in russia, they understand that there must be two sovereign, independent states, which, as i said, can create a unique an association that will be more powerful than some unitary state, today we can say that on our knees belarus. russia is facing tomorrow we will be included in russia, even you working in russia would never vote for this, this should not be done, it will not bring any benefit, we must step by step, step by step, calmly, evolutionarily solve the problems that are facing we stand, here in our union state, how the mess with sanctions began , many questions disappeared on their own, and if in russia, especially, and we have someone in belarus... i think that the union state, tomorrow let's unite, there will be power in the kremlin,

there again and so on and so forth , listen, i am the outgoing president, i say this often, but i am absolutely convinced that no matter who comes after me, this position will not be supported, two sovereign, independent states, we are smart, educated people, to create such a union of sovereign states, independent, so that we can be stronger.

economy, of course, on the scale of global sanctions, on the scale of nato forces, of course, who we are, well, a very easy victim for all their structures, so they are all they are doing it in order to discredit the union state and create discord between moscow and minsk, but it is clear that there is good news, here is our president, there is a president.

creation, but if at the time of creation there was nothing to compare with, now 30 years later you can compare the european union, and the union state, where sovereignty disappears, today in the european union the countries of eastern europe that entered there have lost their sovereignty, and the proof is right now in the square of paris, other countries where farmers

dump shit, it's true, sovereignty no, countries are not independent in making decisions, secondly, why is this being done, there is only one goal: to destroy the union state, to drive a wedge, and if they write about this in the russian media, i have only one conclusion: a fifth column that still exists in russia has not yet been completely cleaned up, because only an enemy of the union state, only an enemy of real integration can say that belarus is on the bread market, that belarus can somehow, and therefore must, lose its statehood, and there is a third truth, which everyone in russia knows, politicians, i meet with... all the leaders of the state duma faction, not only russia strengthens the sovereignty of belarus and the statehood of the union, and this is true, it strengthens sovereignty, but russia also strengthens its sovereignty and statehood in the union with belarus, we mutually strengthen each other, this is a fact of life, and lukashenko, the most ardent supporter of integration, he came to power

with these slogans, he fought for this integration, he met with governors when yeltsin did not need it, when the top of russia... this integration was not needed, he sat down in minsk, he received the governors brick by brick, built an alliance, but then russia was lucky, just as we were lucky in ninety-four, when lukashenko came to power, so russia was lucky, they they didn’t expect that putin would come, they thought that yeltsin’s successor would continue the disastrous policy of the collapse of russia, but he began to raise russia from its knees, one of the steps for russia to become strong is the union of belarus with russia. and the last point, here are the baltic friends, hear me.

understand already, there will be no strong russia , there will not be a single strong post-soviet country, there will be no safe europe, and the most amazing thing is that there will be no europe without russia, this is a fairy tale, but there is another truth, without a strong, independent belarus, without a calm belarus , without the belarus that exists now, there will be no strong russia, why did they invest millions to overthrow the government here, for one simple reason, if this had happened, russia would have weakened, how they would have digested belarus, but the main goal was another from the moment. collapse of the ussr, there was one goal: to destroy russia once and for all, and belarus, it’s like the brez fortress, like when the nazis were surprised how they passed through all of europe, but some brest fortress is alone, we can’t take it, the front has already left, and there our people are standing and fighting, it’s the same here, so they will be in the thirties, in the thirty-fifths, in

the forties, as long as they have dreams of destroying russia, they will try to destroy its main and only true ally, not... .my colleagues really said very correct things, i subscribe to every word, and well , you know, two players are better than one, throughout the entire existence of the union state, we have proven that these are two absolutely sovereign, strong states, and we are not even talking about any province.

and as for belarus, it is part of the union state, and unleashing aggression against belarus will mean aggression against the russian federation, to which we will respond with all the means at our disposal. well, we will hope, of course, that there will be enough prudence for everyone, and no one inside the state will not receive ours, and the russian state, so much power to destroy separately belarus, separately russia, the most important thing. they froze our participation in this organization, he said this while on a visit to france. according to pashinyan, the udkb did not fulfill its responsibilities

towards armenia during the karabakh events. this is not the first time such assessments have been heard from the prime minister of armenia. in 2022, pashinyan refused to sign the final document of the csto council for the absence of a condemnation clause in it azerbaijan. in 2023, armenia demonstratively did not participate in csto exercises, instead trying to build contacts with nato. at the polling station on sunday , journalists asked alexander lukashenko about this situation, he commented. why are there such statements, the prime minister spoke about this. have you tracked what's next? they communicate with emmanuel macron all the time there in france, statements followed, france will help with systems limited to air defense systems, in the military field, in the economy, well, in general, it will take yerevan on its shoulders will carry it. nobody will carry anyone. you see what is happening in france, so politicians in yerevan need to wake up, in popular words, there is no need to lose what they have, no one in

the west needs them, there are thousands, thousands of problems, today, for example, in the usa biden will support ukraine, armenia and so on, tomorrow the government will change and trump will say , listen, i don’t know you, my friends, this is the first time i’ve seen you, what was wrong, and even worse in afghanistan, remember when they clung to the landing gear.. afghans, take us, take us us, we worked for you , we fell and died, in such a compact, small state like armenia, there is belarus and others, there is no need to make any sudden movements , we will fall through thin ice, no one can reach us, on the contrary, they will push us with their feet so that you will choke there, therefore - armenians don’t need to rush, it seems to me that nikola bovajevich was just in a hurry and made an emotional statement. the president very tactfully, diplomatically, like a wise leader

who works for creation in the post-soviet space, commented on this situation, this is correct, because it’s easy to destroy alliances, belarus has always made sure that these alliances are preserved and contradictions are removed, by the way, if someone criticizes the csto, my friends, i want them to look at nato, there are contradictions in the csto, well, 100 times less than in nato bloc, they generally have their own form of turkey. although they are a member of nato, believe me, they will never do what the americans want them to do on many issues. another point is that no one really needs armenia, except those who are next to it and the csto fulfilled its mission, we did not unleash the big war that the americans dream of, and if someone from the armenian elite hopes that the west wants a peaceful, prosperous, strong armenia, then i want to disappoint, for them armenia. this is a state that should be used for swinging, let me clarify, yes, on the one hand, we understand that, of course, this is the sovereign right

of armenia, but on the other hand, you always correct yourself, how much sovereignty is there in this decision of armenia, and then you follow the next one, like there would be a logical path in the next chain, which leads to the fact that we already see the example of ukraine, why does armenia think that it will be different, the same france has already given security guarantees, there will be no security, they need war, but where does it all begin and... and today, as our head of state said, there are a lot of reasonable politicians, including in the country’s parliament, and such a decision, but

freezes, well, it can’t happen at all, because either you are in the csto, or you left the csto, there are no decisions the country's parliament did not take any action on this matter, this is the first second, it is indeed a very complex region, and armenia must understand that it needs to interact with russia, it needs to be friends, it needs to be in a bloc alliance, france, well... armenia is now looking towards iran and iran supports armenia, allegedly even supplies weapons there, there is such information, but iran has a very complicated relationship with azerbaijan and we must not forget. that in iran there live more than, well, there are , in my opinion, 35 million ethnic azerbaijanis, almost 42%. and iran

doesn’t need a conflict with azerbaijan either. listen, on what does armenia expect to feed its weapons with its weapons? well, russia is already that ally, faithful, time-tested, and i agree that it is really a great merit of the csto that the conflict was not unleashed, that anyone who counts on france’s ability to defend someone’s state interests should look at west africa, a region that has traditionally had french influence and what this region has come to, all countries that have actually abandoned.

actually is huge so several not a fun, but important museum , a museum of the defeat of europe in all wars, here near boris we have the famous village of studenka, where there is also a separate territory of the french republic, on which there is a monument to those soldiers of the french army , soldiers, officers who died as re-transporting once. through this through the berezina next to the student, so, probably, we need to organize such massive visits of french citizens to us, but we don’t have visas, come, look, see how many graves there really are, and show what the end result is politics always brings populists like macron to our region and to the region where

they are trying. come on, this is armenia , azerbaijan, yes, but something else is important, if in part of armenia, they are trying through armenia to stab us in the back through those, through integration projects that we, yes, including thanks to the efforts of our president, have been creating for a long period of time , yes, if we focus on security issues, yes, security issues are not related to politics.

yes, it’s clear why, only one of the answers, who benefits from war? bbc: the war in ukraine has sharply boosted demand for american weapons. its exports rose to a record $238 billion in the last fiscal year, according to a state department report. once again, this is not the only reason, but one of the answers to the question of who benefits. when we say that a global demand for justice is ripe and the old world order is bursting at the seams, it is important to understand that.

noise and abuse and is characterized by a timid nature, this is true, but this is not the whole truth, capital is afraid. profit or too little profit, just as nature fears emptiness, but once there is sufficient profit, capital becomes bold, provide 10% and capital agrees to any use, at 20% it becomes lively, at 50 it is positively ready to break its head, at 100% it tramples on everything human laws, at 300% there is no crime that he would not risk, at least under pain of the gallows. there is a global battle going on, we, of course, are not in the leading roles in it, but this does not mean at all that we will be able to sit on the sidelines, the world is giving up exam, and we are passing it, as a state and as a people, we should not forget about this.

that's all for today, happy.