they will all be controlled via wi-fi, we work for the consumer. household appliances, everyday goods, light goods, food industry. this is all from there, from the fifties, sixties, from the time of creation, the time of great and small achievements. even, it would seem, in areas that were once uncharacteristic for belarusian industry, such as the production of consumer goods . by the beginning of the seventies, the bssr had already exported such products to more than 100 countries.

second volume, each hero has his own unique history and your view of belarus. i noticed that belarusian students always have a lot of new ideas, they organize different events themselves, i always believe in people, especially these people who live here, between them i didn’t feel like a foreigner or not, on the contrary, i felt at home, really , watch on the belarus 24 tv channel. hello, everything is clear with you about the project with marina karaman. let's talk about complex things in simple terms. today about how international observers get to our elections, what they they think about belarus why osce representatives did not come to us this year. go! a single voting day took place in belarus, the whole country elected deputies to...

parliament and local councils, and we can already state that the process of preparing for the elections was not easy, but they went off without a hitch, and one of the confirmations of this is the opinion of international observers. the electoral commission center accredited 294 international observers, most of them from member countries of the cis, csto, sco joint governing bodies of the union state of russia. and belarus is a friendly country to us, and the arrival of their representatives was expected, but among the observers there were also citizens of states that allowed unfriendly and sometimes aggressive rhetoric towards belarus. 23 foreign observers wanted to come to us as single experts, not representing organizations, parties or unions, among them citizens of germany, italy, spain, lithuania, poland, france, sweden, switzerland.

serbia, bulgaria and iran. and if belarus’ relations with iran and serbia are favorable, then the rest of the listed states have indirectly or directly put pressure on our country in recent years. and their mass media continue to distort the picture of what is happening here in order to justify in the eyes of their society unceremonious interference in the life of sovereign belarus. the presence of independent observers from these countries at our elections is all the more valuable. they took home the fact that western propaganda has been trying to hide the truth about life in belarus from its audience for years. you can endlessly look at three things. lit fire, how water flows and how international observers widen their eyes; having arrived in belarus, they do not hide their shock from the fact that everything here is not at all the way politicians and the press present them. when i say everything, it means everything. they are surprised that none of them were denied accreditation. everyone

who filled out the questionnaires developed by the central election commission received the right to observe our elections of deputies. the next shock for many was. structure of belarus modern cities, cozy settlements, a good level of digitalization and a developed transport system, all this is not at all similar to the living conditions in a country that western media resources present as impoverished, crushed by sanctions with a people who are living on bread and water. the people themselves are also persistently, not ready to look the way the western media portray them. people came to polling stations throughout the week, and on the main voting day it was completely sold out. showed a turnout of 73.9% of registered voters, and then posted photos on their social networks for another day made at the polling stations themselves, against the backdrop of billboards dedicated to the elections, or simply with the hashtag “edg unified voting day”. therefore, the resumes of all international observers

are similar, plus or minus. the voting process in belarus meets democratic standards; the people have the right to choose and do so consciously. for example, a political journalist from poland. ronald losetsky noted that order and security reign in belarus. our cities have changed a lot for the better in the 15 years he hasn't been here. he shares with his readers and colleagues’ impressions of belarus and is going to draw the attention of the polish authorities to the need to establish, and not break, ties between our peoples. and here are the words of his compatriot krzysztaf tolwiński. quote: the legality and correctness of the elections does not raise any doubts in my mind. belarus has excellent democratic standards. end of quote. simon vaspereni, from france, visited several polling stations and noted the festive atmosphere, the activity of voters, and the work of members of precinct commissions. here he is right, our elections always take place in an atmosphere reminiscent of national

holidays. by the way, this is not true everywhere. an observer from italy, camilli egor, said that belarusians really participate in the life of the state, and it would be good for some of the country. to adopt our electoral system , his fellow countryman, mateo peggio, is impressed that before the elections there was an active dialogue between the government and the people, people did not just tick boxes, they really understood what they were voting for, but the main thing is that there were no tanks on the streets, as the americans write media, unafraid our italian guests never found any people here, they even talked to voters, and the openness with which the belarusians expressed their opinions especially impressed the members of the delegation who came to our country for the first time. international observers come to our elections by invitation. the president, the council of ministers, both houses of parliament and the electoral commission have the right to invite them. over the years of cooperation with foreign experts

, some traditions have developed in terms of who invites whom. for example, the central election commission invites their colleagues from countries participating in the unions in which belarus is a member or which is preparing to join. advice. ministers, parliament and mitt invite observers from the sco, the cis and its interparliamentary assembly, as well as experts who work individually . next, the potential observer is asked to fill out a questionnaire, he submits it to our department, which invited him, and from there he is sent to the cec. if the questionnaire does not raise any questions, the observer is given the go-ahead for accreditation. all organization costs the inviting department takes responsibility for his arrival. to him. help with a visa, hotel, transport, a person comes to us, goes to the central election commission, receives documents for accreditation, an observer's certificate, badges and a package of documents to familiarize himself with our laws and electoral system, having studied them, the expert can draw conclusions about whether the norms are being followed during voting or

not. further, observers can freely travel around the country; there is no specific route for them; they have the right to go to any voting station at any time. v in any corner of belarus, as a rule, the travel itinerary is drawn up in the evening so that the agency inviting the expert can organize logistics, but the observer can abandon the plans at any time. the osce does not have uniform standards by which they would evaluate the quality of elections.

for example, in this matter we rely on the convention on the standards of democratic elections, electoral rights and freedoms in the cis member states. this document was ratified by the parliaments of all cis countries. he passed the examination of the venice commission, which in europe decides whether a document ensures respect for the rights and freedoms of citizens? even the osce once agreed to this convention. assessment. the osce itself does not have any specific criteria for assessing elections. its observers go to every new country with different manuals and no one ever knows what their requirements are based on, who established them. for example, in 2015, the osce sent about 400 observers to our presidential elections. for a country with a population of 9.5 million people. and for some reason , 40 observers were sent to the us elections, 10 times less than to us. although the population there is 35 times larger. the osce

sent about thirty observers to the presidential elections in poland. in the fall , member of our parliament denis karas was invited to work as an osce observer at the parliamentary elections in poland. but poland simply did not allow him onto its territory for far-fetched reasons. and the osce remained silent. there were no comments or condemnation of the boorish step. what can observers who do not have a working mechanism give us? assessments of the democracy of elections, what rights and they can protect freedoms if they are not able to protect their own missionaries, remember, the observers’ stay here is fully paid for by the belarusian country, and serving an ineffective landing party of 400 people is some kind of thankless task for the budget, but despite the debatable usefulness, if a request came from the osce permission to send a group of observers to us, they would be accepted, what about on voting day? said alexander lukashenko, but we won’t ask them to come again, this game is definitely not

worth the candle. there are enough people in the world ready to register the interest of belarusians in the elections, and a turnout of 73% suggests that there is interest. no, politicians simply became more interested in us, that is, the people, as a living organism, have certainly always been interesting to civil servants, but now they are interested in each of us separately. what we want, what we strive for, what we are afraid of, how we see our land in 10 and 20 years, this is the new belarus, where attention is paid to each individual person, and not to the human mass as a whole. this election campaign was special. have you noticed how they talked to us a lot, how much information was there about the candidates for deputies and discussions about what qualities they should have, how hard did the deputies try to get to know their voters? personally, just recently, skeptics far removed from politics posted photos from polling stations with

the question: have you already voted? we began to see each other, we learned to perceive each other as a link in one chain, we physically felt contact with our representatives in parliament, we finally realized that they are the link through which we we can change laws and allocate our resources. these elections have become a turning point for belarusians, and i am sure they will launch creative socio-political ones. processes that will lead us to next year's presidential elections with confident voters in a strong position. be patient. western countries actually offered us a choice: loss of sovereignty or the iron curtain. we chose ourselves, they slammed the door, but we didn’t lock it and left the keyhole open. the light in it attracts the most curious, and the most the brave ones go inside. after. they bring stories about ours into their distorted world, this flow of information is becoming increasingly difficult to contain, sooner or

later it will sweep away all the doors, and this will be welcomed on both sides, the mood of international observers is clear proof of this. i’m marina karaman and how international observers saw our elections, we sorted it out, everything is clear, see you.

lenin’s house, they wanted to blow it up, tons of explosives and 200 aerial bombs were planted here in the basements, it was not because of the mercy of the siege and the lack of control that the landowner went out to his strip of grain,

the rightful ruler, the giants of the soviet union, was coming. and the earth chakala yago sumlenay pratsy, vyalіkaya savetskaya earth. for savetskaya belarus, the report says, the blessed five-year plan will mean not only the liquidation of the german acupuncture war, but also the further development of the people's country and culture, increased life yeah , population health. minsk had the first session of the verkhovnag council of the republic of the republic of dzyataga, which was adclosed.

yana sur'yozna floated on starazhytna, that 's the name of starazhytna-russian style, and all that right now, i guess from the 19th century, this is the very beginning of the palitichny project, the russian project, it is working on and the excavation of such symbolic elements of that old architecture, otherwise it would have been different. let's look at their

history and basic facts. the theater and mass theaters would have been dismantled. red headers, and all this hellishness, it was a white color scheme that worked contrast, and madness, emphasized the focus on these elements, the banks of the 20th century were already planned for pa-insha, there was a great amount of data-memories with quarters for supracounika, look at the architecture of belarus on our tv channel.

to belarus.