and we do this to our own music, the music that sounds inside each of us. she is everywhere, in the sun, in timid movements, at our fingertips. music inspires, makes us think and opens up thousands of roads for us. music can change the world because it can change us, music is inside each of us.

hello, on the air belarus-1 and belarus 24, as always on fridays, the club of editors , we will discuss the most interesting topics of the past seven days, what is being discussed in the country in the world, and i introduce the guests of our today's

not with that, i wanted to start international women’s day, a wonderful holiday, olga alexandrovna, to you personally, in your person, to all our tv viewers on this wonderful holiday, health, smiles, happiness, no matter how trite it may sound, it’s a great pleasure to work together with you, a great pleasure to work with, i think, for each of us.

i watched a lot, but listen, it’s nice to see, beautiful, smiling, in a good mood, here’s a video of the wall confirming my words, a wonderful event, with we watched with great pleasure what happened there, what were your impressions, well, of course, it’s very difficult to talk about impressions here, because there are a lot of them, thank you very much for your congratulations, the women were really looking forward to this meeting, really, this is exactly what what we wanted, what we needed to touch and what we really wanted.

a woman’s happiness is such an all-encompassing happiness, when we wish a woman happiness, it ’s all right, it doesn’t sound trivial, because women’s happiness means children, it means families, it means peace in our home, that’s all that we are surrounded by a positive statement of what surrounds us, so when a woman is happy, the country is happy, i’m not afraid of this word, but on the other hand, maybe it’s not necessary. while creating a party , you know, there is such diversity , diversity of political power, now our people abroad will start, what diversity, where are the feminists, where are the lovers of whatever, the grand duchy of lithuania did not get into parliament, we also love the grand duchy, this is our history, but we do not

speculate on these topics, even if there is a party of women, then we won’t still say author, editor, women will be real women, and not these feminist ones. they are placed very competently, they need to give them their due by definition, they are alien , a certain ideology is instilled , look, even on the one hand they come out with very strict, always aggressive definitions, as soon as they grab

some kind of terrorist, they immediately begin not to be, to be, they are talking about nothing, so listen, you just called, and so did i i can’t help but remember this terrible incident. intervened, who saw, but they, you understand , are not to blame, so we were convinced in this case, it happened on the eve of women's day, we were convinced in this case that those of our fellow citizens, some former, some current, who went there , found themselves in an absolutely defenseless position, this

is what they always say, you can’t even become president, you don’t have to look for happiness in a foreign land, look at what the lithuanians are doing with those belarusians who find themselves, this is how they are being twisted and...

not a single question was asked , which is surprising, in my opinion, because i, as a person who is always interested in these issues somewhere, is not about the military-political situation, that is , women are confident that they have a tomorrow that they will be protected, today these are not the issues that concern our belarusian women, they are concerned about the further development of the country, what will happen next , there is artificial intelligence, family capital, child benefits, that’s all, and where the president is clearly.

regarding ivan mikhailovich your question about elections, then of course the result seems worthy to us, we consider it not accidental, but a prepared course of work of the party, public association, we invested in this work, a lot of preparatory organizational analytical work was carried out. work and therefore good representation in parliament, in the house

of representatives, in local councils, makes us happy, well, satisfies us, but there is no conceit, we understand perfectly well that this is a responsibility, if we have declared ourselves, please confirm this statement affairs, so now, of course, a lot of work will be done to, firstly, the orders of voters, the ideology of the belarusian party belarus, but why is it easy for us? and because the ideology of the party largely coincides with

the ideology of the state, therefore legislative activity, we will implement those meanings, those ideas that are important for every belarusian. andrei evgenievich, as a member of the union of journalists, i come up with a proposal to the leader, the union of journalists is ahead of us, why don’t we hold a congress of the belarusian union journalist, a real big congress with thousands of guests, and invite there, including the head of state, as he thinks. passed, i think that the idea is good , the only thing is that we need to choose the moment, we

are gathering the best journalists, heads of the largest editorial offices, who are members of the union of journalists, so as not to bleed the information field, imagine, we will all gather in one place, let’s say, again same in the national library, and here we have the formation of a council of the republic, and the formation of an all-belarusian people's, it is necessary to choose the moment

, i think, the fields, let’s do this, the poles of our heroes, and we them after that, it seems to me that this image of a woman, which comes from the colossal tradition of the past and develops this image of a woman today, is absolutely correct, media correct, media recognizable, beautiful recognizable, can i support andrei evgenievich on one point, yesterday i happened to be at the opening of an exhibition at the university art gallery in great painting. but no, no, this was an exhibition of children’s drawings, and what does this have to do with an art school, children drew, the competition was held from five to 18 years old, they were presented in several age categories, this is a joint competition of the belarusian women's union and the university of culture, the image of a woman, the image of a belarusian woman, so i was very interested in how our children are, can you imagine, this is the younger generation, because it is very important

how they see a belarusian woman, yes, because we say that a lot is tied to her, when i went in and looked at... all the works, this is how our belarusian woman, our children see, they see her as a mother, this maternity hospital , dad is standing there waiting for his third child, yes, and mom is everywhere positive, mom is everywhere in bright colors, mom is standing near the refrigerator to eat cake at night, mom is harvesting potatoes there together, well, digging potatoes there together with dad, yes, but mother is everywhere next to the children , mother is associated with the sun everywhere, mother is associated with flowers, these are young couples,

active representatives of our female half, he allows a union of women without any party, answering the question that arose: they don’t need a party, they don’t that's why it’s not competition, it’s not, well, calm down, men have gathered here.

interconnected, we talked a lot about peace, naturally, people who watch our program also want to understand what is happening, and it is better, of course, to ask the military, the services that deal with foreign intelligence, but they will not tell us anything, they will not answer to our questions, so journalists, political scientists, economists, philosophers are trying to figure it out and paint some images for people, where we are moving and what dangers , among other things, because people are of course afraid, they warn me, i periodically go there several times - they ask for programs, so we have already reached, so to speak, the red line, is there a solution or not, because well, the last week, even 2 weeks, brought a lot of interesting surprises, somehow this is

the situation for me of course things are heating up, it’s already a frank statement, absolutely no one is shy about anything, here the american washington or whoever you remember dumped an article from which it turned out that in 10 years there were 12 intelligence centers, the new york times, 12 intelligence centers were created on the territory.

the istanbul draft agreement of 1922, suddenly the new york times actually publishes an article that fully confirms russia’s version of preparations for war, and immediately the government provokes

macron, because at first the government made a statement, the prime minister of slovakia, you know, says, what a horror , they actually discuss at closed meetings, here are the troops, macron says, let ’s discuss and let’s go, why did this happen, well, first, they will legalize their... actual participation in this conflict, russia she said about this that the crews of the patriots and other anti-aircraft missile systems and many types of weapons, they are maintained, they are serviced, which means representatives of western countries, well, from the front, guys, how many of these stories have i heard when they say, let’s say bradley is coming, and we see the ukrainian crew being abandoned there, leaving, the bradley that is being pulled out is most likely a western crew.

will launch, there is a high probability from bases in romania, there is a high probability, this is already nato territory, that is, we need to prepare for a more severe clash with russia, then germany is being pushed towards the taurus , no matter what scholz says, germany is now the main sponsor of ukraine in terms of money and weapons, and so on, but 60% of german society is opposed to this, that is, in the end, scholz is forced to pursue a policy that is contrary to public sentiment, etc.

must restore order, well, a super idea, in general a super idea of ​​the western world, it has existed for several centuries, this is to defeat russia, to defeat russia, we can remember a lot of wars, and everywhere this ideology, it is already the impression is that in western european countries and in general in the aglosan world , unfortunately, this super idea is now very... has a great, let's say, reality, in order for the people to warm up the european peoples to this, because for the first time, for the first time in history, an instrument appeared, it is called anti-russia, there is no longer a country, ukraine is a country that has put the destruction of a neighboring country at the head of its ideology, from now on this russia looks like an instrument.

there is talk in the press about what is happening, scholz found himself in isolation, that is, his pro-american elements in the bundestag were pushed to the wall, and he says that no, i won’t deliver the taurus, even if you kill me, but i don’t want to, well, they still say to deliver, but now

he took a position, there was pressure on him, she didn’t have any arguments to resist, this leak of the same german generals, as if, well , some people think that russia threw him such a trump card, but again, i think with an attempt to discredit scholz, well ... europe, we are analyzing all this, in in principle, if we say more, this

is positive for russia, but tactically there are also various points, well, let’s say, now they will supply several hundred thousand shells, they found, after all, they will pay for it, they will supply it, i have almost no doubt that the taurys one or...

from the black sea fleet, so what other recognitions are there that this is already influencing? i agree with vadim frantsich that this is most likely a mischief for scholz, although i also have big doubts here, i want to support what colonial policy is, france is a unique combination republics, and a colonial republic at that, which colonized vietnam and north africa, now, in my opinion, there is such a push in europe in the european union. in general, shoving, who will be in charge there, in this gangster terminology, who will be the watcher, who will be the boss. it is obvious that scholz, with all his weakness, unpopularity and terrible unpopularity, especially in germany, cannot cope with this mission role.

no one in continental europe wants to give britain sole leadership over the management of the ukrainian conflict to the misty islands. wants. therefore, yes, there is france, macron, who is leaving, who no longer has. ahead of the political presidential future , on the one hand he was pressed in africa, they said, get out of niger, goodbye, so he interferes in ukraine more actively, declares that we will send french soldiers there, foreign legions and so on, he interfered in georgia, and he is now actively interfering with armenia, these french interests in georgia and armenia, in order to squeeze russia from the other side in ukraine, so it seems to me that this is what the frenchman is talking about, by the way.

russia at one time in the early 2000, in the late nineties, proposed a very good model that would replace their ideology of how to take over russian resources, it itself began to supply these resources, and above all to germany, yes, it set a bad example for the united arab emirates to everyone else, do you understand later what you did first when the conflict began? they blew up the northern streams, that is

, they cut this thread, they showed that overseas corporations are overseas, the american money state will not allow to develop this model of cooperation, economic cooperation, in fact it was beneficial to russia and was beneficial to europe, this was destroyed, and at the same time, naturally, a hot conflict began.

didn’t mean that, or maybe he meant something else, but the president of the czech republic supports him, the president of the czech republic does not support him, these are the kinds of stories that come out in the media, in my opinion, they distract attention from the main thing, from what that the military-industrial complex of the west is now also starting to work very actively, and a lot of money is being invested in it , i personally have a feeling, as it once was with ukraine, when angela merkel said that it was necessary to simply stall for time until the entry into a big war, now there is a feeling that with all these things we just...

we saw this, firstly, about nato, we started talking about it recently, but sometimes it seems to me that such statements that reveal the map, for example, they don’t think about elon musk, remember he wrote quite recently, that nato is the reason for everything, why this it was necessary to dissolve nato after the collapse of the soviet union, i couldn’t come up with anything better, as the president of latvia renkiewicz made

a statement, dear elon musk, the reason why nato was founded, exists and will exist is russia and other enemies of the free world, russia. what has nato done in recent decades? he lied that he was rebuilding missiles against iran and the northern one was approaching, nato officially declares that they are against russia and they have been approaching the borders of the russian federation for decades. what should was there putin's reaction to this? they are self-exposing themselves, because sekorsky, by the way, gave an amazing speech there, about stereotypes, stereotypes and lies.

intelligence begins to operate in the pskov and leningrad regions, it would seem that the following, look, there were recently publications in the polish press, they recalled how poland joined nato, how lech walesa convinced the west to let poland in, absolutely anti-russian rhetoric, again this there was yeltsin’s russia at that time, then let’s remember what andrei evgenevich is about, yes i said now, an attempt to deploy missiles, missile defense, this was even before the war in south ossetia, of course. they started doing this in the 2000s, when bush said that he looked into putin’s eyes and saw his soul there, that is, this is a consistent anti-russian policy, and it was the eastern europeans, poles, balts who acted as the locomotive, yes, maybe one of russia is afraid of them, but most importantly, they sold and are selling russophobia as

their only national idea and the only product that is ahead anything they say about... so to speak, not to fight with russia, but because of russia and has been approaching the borders for decades, and putin could not help but

react to this, then they all shouted, remember, when the svo began, what in general nato has nothing to do with it, putin is just an invader, he wants it. kill all the ukrainians, seize the lands , then reach berlin, now a wonderful video has appeared, in the end stoltenberg admitted that this is the case, but watch the video, how our information service likes to quote cnn, bbc, european media have been lying for 2 years about the fact that nato has nothing to do with it, just let’s see. putin sent a draft treaty and wanted nato to sign it, promising not to expand it.

hold elections, it's all about democracy, it 's not about nato, the war in ukraine has nothing to do with nato, nato has nothing to do with it, no connection to nato, nothing to do with nato expansion, it's not about nato expansion. this has nothing to do with it, it’s not about nato expansion, it ’s not about nato at all, it’s not about nato expansion, it’s not about nato, these are the facts, nato has nothing to do with it, it’s not

in nato, nato is just such an imaginary enemy for mr. putin, nato has nothing to do with it, he just wants to expand his sphere of influence. russia wanted to maintain influence over ukraine, and had the west not challenged this, it was clear that war could have been avoided. he wanted us to promise never to expand nato, but we refused. a few words, i was already here on our program a few months ago, when we were discussing one of the problems, i remembered george orul with his dystopia, this is peace - this is war, war is peace, ministry truth, honestly, my word immediately comes to mind, when everything is turned upside down, white is called black, regarding nato, let me remind our viewers of the history of its origins, the bloc appeared in the forty-ninth year.

let's confirm, here we are in the twentieth year , and there was a rebellion that happened, well, how much time has passed, many of them are spilling the beans about what happened, at first they said that people came out against violence, then they began to call it a revolution, remember , we also drew attention to this, in 3 days there was no rebellion it was a success, yes, then they themselves began to call it a rebellion, a peaceful rebellion, this week, who are we financial times, i still continue to correspond with western funds... the most obvious example of russian domination is belarus, the war in ukraine

has drawn out even more closely the regime of alexander lukashenko into the orbit of moscow. however , it is noteworthy that the kremlin has not yet made an attempt to absorb belarus into russia and has not left its neighbor to become full participants in the war. any step could destabilize lukashenko’s dictatorship, neither moscow nor minsk have forgotten that the peaceful, pro-democracy uprising of the twentieth year threatened to be destroyed. russian tyrant , as luck would have it, on this day vyacheslav kasinerov, an experienced anarchist, was convicted in 1917 for throwing a noose on a monument to a policeman, remember, he is giving an interview to some garbage dump, that’s what he says, and people are in chains learned to walk, including thanks to educational videos made by anarchists, people there interfered with molotov cocktails thanks to videos made by anarchists and the actions that the anarchists did, only my comrades and comrades there.

i would like to connect this question and the previous one on nato with the same logic, i absolutely support dmitry aleksandrovich’s thesis that you cannot trust these hypocrites as their offspring, they open their mouths and lie, i even remember in this regard. your personal journalistic experience as a correspondent for the belarusian radio company, remember, we had such a dialogue, constructive on our part , constructive, including with nato. such an emissary came, janusz bugajski, a political scientist, very close to the service, information and analytical structures of nato, so i wrote an interview with him in the belarusian foreign ministry, what the belarusian side said then and what is the difference, we

always spoke honestly on principle and the president said this. including to numerous emissaries from the united states, that you will not replace russia for us, russia is our strategic ally, and we will fulfill our sacred obligations, but in cooperation with you we are ready to resolve several significant, fundamental issues for us: stopping human trafficking, fight drug trafficking and weapons trafficking , including weapons, elements of weapons of mass destruction, among other things, another question that is so...

several more military facilities of the allied group and the russian federation, maybe you can first indicate the duration of their stay on the territory of belarus, that is, set the final date, as was the case with the black sea fleet, and the final date for their stay on the territory of belarus, then we will... talk to you further, so once again, everything they offer is a lie, this way negotiations, when a problem is artificially created, then it expands to a universal scale, then it becomes a reason, including an invasion of the sovereign interests of the republic of belarus, if not, if the sovereign state does not give in to their logic, then yes, anarchists are being raised,

they are being raised. .. the role of president lukashenko in supporting donbass, i don’t know what they are talking about, but thus, having considered your comment, the council came to the conclusion that they do not question the decision on the need to use restrictions, restrictive measures against the belarusian radio company, respectively , the senate, the council decided to keep your company on the lists of individuals and legal entities subject to restrictive measures, although they were not asked to be excluded from these lists, on the same day in nikopolis the local

council accepted. in ukraine, decides to name a street in honor of the war criminal, accomplice in the holocaust petrachenko, who received a cross personally from the hands for his services to the nazis, personally from the hands of vadim franzovich, adolf hitler, i heard this version, but he received the cross for sure, this is the legislative branch, the ukrainian authorities, i’ll read it again, we... the very fact that you presented evidence, they consider the justification for the war against ukraine, that is, a priori, never, under no circumstances, not with any evidence, this regime

cannot be called nazis, this is their logic, i remember well. history in the canadian parliament, what are you talking about, no matter what we do, no matter how we prove it, they don’t consider it proof. once again you need to understand this enemies, this is an adversary, this is an enemy who does not want to see anything, they are sponsoring this nazi regime, they understand perfectly well who they are dealing with. i’ll give

you a historical analogy, i’ve already referred to it more than once, but i really like it, because it’s revealing, it’s just extreme cynicism, these documents were deciphered by the americans to the cia, when it was a long time ago, the second world war was ending, they were dealing with fugitives belarusian nationalists, jackpot,

i looked at a portion of their ukrainian analytics right away and the military, look at theirs the generals there of zaluzhny syrsky with whom they compare the beetles rokosovsky is not close even chernyakhovsky who seems to be yes no what kind of kovpak what are you talking about they are even with a noose.

who participated in the holocaust, he personally received an award from hitler, for which we congratulate the council of europe, wrote , you know, the council of europe and all other organizations, they will defend and medially

support the instrument with which they fight russia , they are destroying russia, for them ukraine with its ideology, i will repeat once again what i said at the beginning programs, this is an anti-russian tool, they, excuse me, will... keep you in restrictions that do not apply to you in any way, this is again such a psychological move on the audience that supposedly you are in some way, in my opinion, the belteleradiocompany is developing it has become even better, to put it mildly, look , the most important thing is that the audience must understand that this is not just a play on words, some examples, so we showed this anarchist with nails, cocktails, we will now put on pushilin’s words that ukraine was going to attack russia, remember odessa.

that is, a different situation, if the president had not made this decision, when the enemy attacks there, the enemy attacks, there, it would have been much more difficult than it happened in this way, well, in confirmation of the words of denis vladimirovich, just facts, numbers, a law was adopted, we remember 21 april zelensky that at least 5% of gdp should be the military budget, let me remind you that trump in nato is fighting for 2%, they adopted at least five, this is...

under control cia officers, former employees the gestapi, entire colonies created escaping nazis on the territory of latin american countries in order to create concentration camps there for anti-american activists, there are a lot of examples of these, a huge number, we mentioned. anti-colonialism, which

goes on, what they did in africa after african countries gained independence, so that they could not develop, they sent their mercenaries there, france simply acted as a locomotive there, they committed terrible atrocities, what they did in indonesia, were in indonesia tens of thousands of communists were destroyed in the sixties because there was a leftist wave there, you can give more examples, but i don’t say, here’s taiwan, i’ll finish now, taiwan gathered around it, as if taiwan were opposing.

nuclear weapons on civilians, we did not do everything that vadim franzovich spoke about, we, if indeed the soviet army was in afghanistan, was, but what did the soviet union do there, it built plants and factories there, paved roads, treated people, hospitals, did, leaving there, left a civilized society with a normal management system, the americans came, how many times did drug production jump in afghanistan, not even by several times - this is about

the question of who is, so i, to the best of my ability, at meetings with people, convey the following, it is us, yes, in our history not everything was smooth, but we did not create, we were not non-humans, we did not create, well then you philosophers, scientists must formulate what we should call them, well, you know, we can call it even now, here this word has already been said, remember, they are an evil empire, but we now we often call everyone an empire of lies. but we must understand for ourselves that our civilization, our history is to a large extent a history of creation, while what we called the civilized world the world is a history of genocide and destruction, it turns out that the western world introduces the following thesis into ideology, yes, what we often call a lie, when

it’s a lie, that’s it, it seems in belarusian , it’s not human, which means it’s not like people, well , maybe really sharply, harshly in a polemical form, i agree that it’s not, it’s not always and... it can and should be done, but we we must understand for ourselves that our civilization , our history is largely a history of creation, while what we called the civilized world is a history of genocide and destruction, it turns out that the western world introduces the following thesis into ideology: yes, what to live for counting other people, while killing them, this is normal, but this is only allowed to them, this is a golden billion, again in ladvia.

what i read there, but it’s simple, of course, and time after time, in fact, creating a wonderful image of the future, us through the media this influence, through informational influence, through ridiculous caricatured images, is taken away from this, from their picture of the future, by the hand and they say that it was false, incorrect. we did everything wrong in afghanistan and in africa, when we helped these peoples throw off colonial dependence, in general, nowhere did we, in china, when we helped, nowhere were we wrong, so we absolutely support the president, one of my favorites is his phrases that

ivan mikhailovich said, including to you , that the media is a weapon today stronger than nuclear, that’s the image in the minds of the majority of humanity, who will create it?

she says, well, here the bazaar was already so active, there 400-450 years ago, people were already gathering here, that’s all, and the girl turns to her mother and says: mom, look, our country is only 200 years old, here are the people.

.. they ask him, why do you think america is great, there but russia is not, what kind of phone do you have, an iphone, russian, yes, and what kind of printing machine do you have, and well , he gave three examples like this, understand that greatness is valued, this is what you, as historians, philosophers, valued is the greatness of the country, the greatness of nations, so now we have to give an assessment by iphone.

the west and the evil indians, opachi, camanche, sioux, shaen, only around the eighties, this is dances with wolves, so they begin to change their attitude towards this.

yes, but they taught us to appreciate through this, well, they taught us, that is, they penetrated into ours, into our consciousness, raised our youth somewhere partially, they, they imposed their values ​​on us, and they managed to do it through fiction, through their works, through their films, through their media, through their comics, because they did it very aggressively, we are now sitting and telling what we really are, but we also need... i wanted to say this, and we are doing, it seems to me, right, we are now starting,

maybe the first growth among young people , of course, you know better, you are a teacher, and there are probably problems there, textbooks are an eternal history, ideology, and anthems, and history , and so on further, which was purged from education, well, to some extent, of course, i can’t give an assessment, i don’t want to offend anyone, i know for sure that the west worries our fugitives the most; they kill them most of all.