his strength, both physical and moral. if you try to protect him from unpleasant news or the next difficulty , on which the boss must again make a difficult decision, the big boss, says the president , from such unnecessary, although probably sincere , well-intentioned care, he will definitely become spoiled, says the president, and i think it ’s very important, that this was said personally by alexander lukashenko, it was said publicly, moreover, it was said when there was no clear reason for it, that is, he was not asked. relevant question

forcing him to answer it, it was a short remark from the head of state, improvisational, fleeting, but very important, because for starters, we still have a subordinate in our system of public administration, who, precisely in her functionality, sees mainly hyper-concern for the superior leader, in order to protect him from troubles and adversities, there are also managers, what is there, who want to see exactly the same from their subordinates, so that he is in a warm management bath, nothing would prevent him from taking... these procedures, and if other citizens bring something into the bath , then preferably a pleasant invigorating cocktail of some good news, which may be either untrue or insufficiently true, but which does not interfere with this foam swim. it is also important that our enemies have a corresponding and media false story about the head of state, that supposedly a person, largely single-handedly, resolved issues for the country, first in oil, then in medicine, in politics, in street confrontations, then in the economy .

and that’s why they report not so much about achievements, as much as about existing difficulties. just believe me, even understanding how the system of parallel control of issues by different supervising bodies works, so that the picture on the issue is completely clear at the very top, without removing distortions, is not easy, but to build it was, i’ll say pathetic, but art. yes, this art is tied to...

specifically one person and not just anyone, specifically alexander lukashenko, like many other issues in the country are tied to him personally, regardless of how you treat this as it is , and we must treat it, by the way, with deep gratitude, our enemies understand exactly who the main problem is for them on the path to gaining power in belarus, and they see power as a means of economic enrichment, because the power of politics is in their hands in general, was invented only in order to make it cheaper to receive income from...

enterprises, which, of course, will never happen in government management, because the state is a much larger complex mechanism, but in my opinion, the ultimate goal of any leader, any enterprises - this is to organize work in such a way that one day you will be able to sit in a comfortable chair and do nothing else, because everything works perfectly without the direct intervention of this top boss, the personnel have been correctly selected, tactical and strategic tasks have been correctly set, and they have certainly been streamlined. control and the mechanism for reacting to some emergency situations works, products are produced, revenue grows, salaries are paid regularly, they also, of course, grow, the manager has the goal, with this organizing the correct process, of course , does not mean sitting in a chair and happily sitting in it, so that the enterprise can function independently and without this leader at all. this goal is not always achieved, to put it mildly, but this goal must be there, one must strive for it. i will even say:

there are more such managers in belarus when they organize the process in such a way that everything in the enterprise works like clockwork without a top boss, what does the president do with such a boss, correctly, transfers to... something else enterprise, where he again begins to build a working system again, i admit that this leader is purely human, he is not very enthusiastic, but as alexander grigorievich said, personal aside, only the state, only state interests, the state as a mechanism that works properly and well, for many years under any external pressure, it is of course much more complicated, but the goal of a competent leader still remains the same, to strive for autonomy from the super-supervision of the management system, and now morality, if... we have a successful enterprise, and the general director leaves and the enterprise crumbles, which means that it was not the enterprise that was successful, only its general director, and then success is very conditional, at best tactical, and if by and large , if the boss left everything fell apart, not the boss was not good, neither the team nor

the enterprise, now the main fragment of tuesday, let’s go without any equivocations, i understand what a president is for belarus, with such power, do you feel? and who will not regret his life there, as it were it didn’t sound pretentious, forgive me, i live up to this for now, i have no other life besides you, and nevertheless, and nevertheless, you must understand, i’m not the evening, you will live under the new president, and i won’t add anything

i won’t even go into this, because it’s superfluous, it’s necessary, if necessary, to listen to it again to understand, just one remark, alexander lukashenko is absolutely a wonderful leader. we already know this, but we will be convinced of this many times over for a very long time. my name is igor tur, this was my propaganda. what kind of children's party is this? who soiled the dress? i ask, who screwed it up? dress, no, it looks like i ’ll never be on the list, how can it be, you got a’s in all your exams, yeah, listen, you wo n’t be in line to sew for me, well, if i get a job, the people behind this door sew haute couture and work with import, this is disgusting, you seriously want to convince me that this is just like chanel,

it’s not about the suit, it’s about you, when they took you to the section, they warned you that we have special clients here and that the attitude towards them should also be special.

kharchenko, nadezhda yakovlevna, was born in 1921 in the village of korsunovka, poltava region. on december 22, 1942, at the decisive moment of the battle, she

replaced the deceased machine gunner and supported the partisan attack with fire, which contributed to the success of the combat operation. she died in the same battle. nadezhda yakovlevna kharchenko was awarded the order of lenin.