will put the relevant information. mechanisms for combating cybercrime in belarus are constantly being improved and are already creating certain difficulties for scammers. for example, since march, according to a new presidential decree, banks have been exchanging information with law enforcement officers around the clock about illegal financial transactions or their attempts. now it is easier and faster to intercept the withdrawal of stolen money abroad. but experts strongly recommend not to neglect their advice and to include critical thinking in order to protect you from such risks. after all. plus five olympic licenses for the belarusian wrestling team. our athletes performed successfully at the qualifying tournament in baku. let me remind you that in order to win the quota, the wrestlers had to make it to the finals of the championship, and irina kurochkina was the first to do this. in the weight category up to 57 kg, the belarusian began her journey from the quarterfinals, where she defeated the russian olga khoroshevtseva, and then confidently won.

russia, the fight was quite worthy, an intense fight, i think that veronica we still have a chance, she will get a ticket to the olympic games. belarusian freestyle wrestlers performed triumphantly at the tournament in baku, winning four quotas at once: denis khramenkov, alexander gushtyn and magomed khabib kadim magomedov will go to the main competition of the four years for the second time in their careers. aryan tyutrin also booked a trip to paris.

well done, naturally, there are also worthy opponents there, he coped with it without any problems, and now he can calmly prepare for the olympic games, we were going to give all our strength, but a little more left, if needed, they also gave it away, the fights took place, somewhere there were intense fights, somewhere i didn’t sleep well, it didn’t work out, for some reason there were some nuances, everything is still floating. in total

, belarusian wrestlers received seven olympic licenses. previously, vanessa kaladinskaya and abubakar khaslakhanov also won quotas. the athletes will have their last chance to get a ticket to paris at the world qualifying tournament, which will be hosted by istanbul in may. and this is the information picture of monday, april 8th. our broadcast will continue with the project “understandable politics”. and immediately after the sports news and weather forecast. current interview with state secretary of the security council of belarus alexander valfovich. with this i say goodbye, all the best. happily in an understandable policy about the last day of legitimate ukraine, that’s what they call march 31, the country was supposed to hold presidential elections, which zelensky successfully canceled. i respect that you don’t have to choose for an hour. the arguments are sewn with white thread, the goals are extremely clear. the overdue president does not care about laws and usurped power.

first, let's look at the law; zelensky blamed the reluctance to hold elections on martial law; before it ended , the parliamentary campaign was also canceled in the country. zelensky’s supporters refer to article 108 of the constitution, which states that the president performs his duties until a new president is elected, since the elections are being held during the war. the election law also prohibits any elections from being held during martial law. it sounds nice, but it’s not logical, they say opponents, because in the same constitution there is no

direct ban on holding presidential elections during martial law. the cancellation or postponement of voting concerns only the parliamentary election campaign. that's what it says. article 83 of the basic law. since elections to the verkhovna rada of ukraine cannot be held during a martial law or state of emergency, the term of its activity is extended for the duration of the elections after the state of emergency and martial law in the first session of the newly elected parliament. that is, according to the constitution, during martial law , the powers of the rada can be extended, which is what is happening now. there is no reservation about the president. the remnants of the opposition demand compliance with the norms.

the performance of the duties of the president of ukraine for the period until the election of the new president of ukraine is assigned to the chairman of the verkhovna rada of ukraine. just last year, zelensky fully

allowed for elections. in august he said that he did not hold on to power and would like to conduct a campaign. in the fall , he also said that he was ready, but the ukrainians were no longer ready. and after a couple of weeks it closed. noting to him that elections allegedly cannot be held according to ukrainian laws. throughout 2023, the presidential election was a fairly discussed topic, although the presidential administration did not make clear promises in this regard. everything finally became clear in november last year, when it became clear that the counteroffensive had completely failed. the united states is in no hurry to allocate a new tranche, and other western countries have begun to delay arms deliveries. zelensky's rating began to fall rapidly, he said that in the current given the situation, holding elections will not be timely, but will only lead to disunity in the country. and all this talk about possible elections is called nothing more than a game, for three reasons: firstly, zelensky wanted

to show that he would not usurp power, and secondly, statements of western representatives pushed him to this. kiev perceives them as a signal of the loss of some trust between it and... the west and the west’s desire to replace zelensky with another candidate, thirdly, zelensky and his team tested the actions of the ukrainian opposition, who is preparing for elections, where does it get money from, what media, who is supported. for those who do not understand, zelensky will say again in early march: do not wait for the elections, around the same time the public will have access to the data of sociologists on whom ukrainians want to see as a leader. spoiler, not zelensky.

the bankers dealt quickly, zaluzhny was removed from his post and expelled from the country, appointing him as the british ambassador. the commander-in-chief opposed his resignation, but zelensky assured that he himself asked for a representative job. up to uk for now zaluzhny never made it, and his forced resignation only added to his popularity. by canceling the elections, zelensky came up with another argument, saying that the election campaign spends a lot of resources, but they are needed at the front, so with all regret, he will have to take such a step, although analysts see differently: the mayor of kiev vitaliy klitschko was ready to join the coalition. , and such an alliance beat itself. and his party by several tens of percent. it turns out that the president

cannot be changed during a conflict with the russian federation, it is unsafe and generally almost immoral. but it is possible to change the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine. there are no problems with this. the logic is very beneficial for zelensky. one of zelensky’s last interviews against the backdrop of firewood in some hangar, they say right on the front line. communication with fox news will be classified as quite comical with the prefix.

let’s just remind you that only a month has passed since that very poll, zelensky is responsible for the extension of martial law, he also forbade himself and others from holding negotiations with russia in order to complete conflict. here is a simple formula for power: while we are at war, we will not give up power, but we will not end the war. why didn’t zelensky make such changes because he’s not confident in himself and can’t act the way, for example, what happened in russia, where elections were held even in...

and as always those same western standards sounded to their own people, they say , if the elections are not

ideal, there will be no questions, but if the voting does not take place, then it’s really a disaster. either after the failed sociology for zelensky, or after the decision of the western apkoma, but the rhetoric of high officials in europe and the united states suddenly sharply deflated. ursula fondelein stated that the elections are an internal matter of ukraine, and it is not for her to comment on this. the state debt outlined a similar position, and they suddenly understood. citizens consider the elections dangerous and senseless against the backdrop of hostilities, so that

no one doubts that he is not clinging to the place, he told how difficult his work is, but while there are difficulties in the country, i will not go anywhere, just a hero, not a president. of course, here they make fun of zelensky and they cite russia as an example, where elections were held just in march, purely without serious comments; zelensky himself, after the announcement of the results, still managed to criticize the kremlin. the main tyranny of the world calmly conducts presidential elections, and the current head of state receives record support from the population. the hope of all mankind is the last stronghold of the democrats. he simply pretends that there should not have been any elections on march 31 on its territory, and the western world completely agrees with this state of affairs. another a piquant moment, the main pretext, as you already understood, is martial law. zelensky is not holding elections because there is a war in the country, they say it’s not the right time. the paradox is that ukraine is not at

war with russia. kiev did not officially declare war on moscow. then he may lose military and financial assistance . the fact is that if ukraine declares war, the us and the eu. indeed, in this case, the western allies will officially become accomplices in the war and, in fact, will enter into it. ukraine is in a state of martial law. martial law is not about war. this provision is about the defeat of the rights of ukrainians, and what is happening is that they have banned travel outside the country and so on, but on the contrary, in the criminal code, for example, there is an article that provides for criminal liability for the use of martial law for the purpose of usurping power, then, which is what happens, once again, ukraine did not declare war and did not put it into a state of war, did not put it into a state

of war for one simple reason, so that the credit rating would not be damaged and so that the west could continue to lend to ukraine, exclusively from... this is openly discussed in political circles of ukraine. this man is determined to be a president of duty and generally decided not to bother with any legal or political steps either in parliament or in the constitutional court of ukraine. at the same time, zelensky is carrying out a harsh purge of personnel and throwing them out. teams of even loyal friends and comrades, those who went through fire, water and copper pipes with him. even first assistant sergei shifir was fired; zelensky had been close with him since quarter. apparently, there is a lack of understanding not only in society, but also in the immediate environment. active uses the theme of the end of zelensky’s presidential powers in his rhetoric and his former associates. ex-speaker dmitry rozumkov

believes that the powers of the president expire on may 20, 2024. then they need to be transferred to the speaker of the verkhovna rada, and one of the former influential people's deputies of the servant of the people faction, alexander dubinsky, who is now under investigation for treason, directly accuses zelensky of usurping power. it is clearly stated in the constitution that happen: there is a chairman of the verkhovna rada, he performs the functions of the president until a new president is elected and assumes his rights. everything is standard, everything is democratic. i understand that neither zelensky nor his office like this, but the law is the law. on the other hand, zelensky can really do what he wants, there will be no political crisis within the country, because no one can object to the servant of the people. the main opponents are either in exile or almost in exile. dissent is harshly persecuted by the intelligence services, and for an alternative opinion

you can easily end up in prison with the prefix for treason based on the kremlin’s narratives. the very concept of opposition in ukraine has become conditional, the media that expressed alternative views have long been closed, leaders who allowed themselves to criticize the top leadership are either killed or in prison. the most fortunate ones managed to leave ukraine, leaving only pro-western politicians who will do whatever they are told from abroad. however, experts considered that ukraine is no stranger to violating the constitution over the past 10 years. it all started with coup d'etat for european values. and we must start not with who and why canceled the current elections, with who and how destroyed the legal mechanisms for changing power in the country. this happened 10 years ago during the so -called maidan. neither the ukrainian

constitution nor other state documents provided for such a form of expression of will. on february 22, 2014, the verkhovna rada adopted a resolution on the self-removal of yanukovych and appointed turchynov as acting. this was a direct violation of the constitution. a day later, parliament canceled law on the fundamentals of state policy. russian, previously one of the main languages, became regional. article 10 of the constitution of ukraine still guarantees the free development of use. protection of the russian language and other languages ​​of national minorities. this article has not been respected since 2014. it was the ban on the use of russian that became one of the reasons for...