the countdown began for another new post-war enterprise in the republic, a motorcycle and bicycle enterprise. literally a couple of months later, the plant designers were already demonstrating the first model - the b16 bicycle. there were not enough qualified personnel, there was not enough lifting equipment and so on, ingenuity helped out everywhere.

it was, in principle, a european classic, there are no special frills here, it was all done practically, expediently, with the least amount of labor required during production. the first batch was released at the beginning forty-sixth, this year alone they produced more than 6 5. the plant entered the first post-war five-year plan in 1946 with new developments. orlyonok, lastochka, minsk - druzhba are popular brands of bicycles in the ussr, on which more than one generation of soviet people grew up. the production of bicycles in minsk became so successful that the production of mia motorcycles was transferred from moscow to the enterprise. their production was mastered at the end of the first post-war five-year plan in almost a year, and the plant began to be called.

with the design that was taken in germany. the motorcycle was produced entirely in accordance with the the goal for many years was to abandon the battery. the motorcycle was becoming not only a popular mode of transport, it was, like the b16 bicycle, closing the door. they were purchased for the needs of the police and the soviet army. on october 9, 1945 , an emergency message was broadcast on the belarusian radio.

law on the five-year plan for the restoration and development of the national economy of the ussr for 1946-1950. the main task at the end of 1950 was not only to achieve the pre-war level of production, but also significantly exceed it. entered the first post-war five-year plan. and republic. the eighth session of the supreme council of the bssr in september 1946 approved a five-year plan for the restoration and development of its national economy. the republic actually faced a major task - to restore its potential in several post-war years.

hello, everything is clear with you about the project with marina karaman. let's talk about complex things in simple terms. today we’re talking about why we go to belarusian stores. banned from bringing dogs, where pet taxes go and what fee you need to pay for keeping a cat. go! alexander lukashenko signed a law on the responsible treatment of animals and it caused such a resonance on the internet that only

the news about the return of our first cosmonaut from orbit was able to bring down the foam of emotions in the comments. the most discussed norm of the new law was the ban on visiting shops and public places with dogs. their owners were indignant, many wrote that they did not understand who their pets were bothering, and some in the comments even called for a ban on taking them to children's stores. unfortunately, we can assume that the authors of such comments do not have children, but dogs do, and love for dogs, and indeed for any living beings, i personally consider an indicator of humanity, but until this particular form of humanity begins it’s inhumane to impose on others, and you can’t even make it out. in accordance with the new law. the law on the responsible treatment of animals has many provisions aimed at protecting them from arbitrariness and cruelty, but since the article concerning stores has attracted attention and public places, let's talk about it first:

a pet that a person keeps in his home because he feels affection for him, legislators call the animal a companion, paragraph 1.3 of article sixteen of the new... law prohibits bringing and bringing your companion to food stores, stationary cafes and restaurants, to public and social service facilities, cultural infrastructure, educational institutions, healthcare organizations, physical education and sports, livestock breeding facilities, the territory of physical culture and sports facilities , wine facilities, the owners of which have prohibited animals from entering there, then there are notes stating: that these requirements do not apply to cases where events with the participation of animals are held in the specified places, for example, a cat show in the arena or a competition “me and mine” dog in the cultural center. in addition, the ban does not work if the owners of some objects from the list, in a visible place, post

information that pets are allowed to them, that is, to a grocery store with dogs are not allowed, but in a cafe, the owner will hang a sticker on the door stating that his establishment is friendly to houses... animals are allowed, but before it was not allowed under any conditions, and if some cafes allowed their customers to come with furry friends, it was illegal, so what do you think, is the new norm so bad? now , as for walking with pets in grocery stores, let's think about it, and dogs and cats definitely belong next to products designed for mass consumption, for every owner his favorite the most fluffy and fragrant, but the facts are as follows: the dog: runs on the ground, pokes its nose into everything it sees and gets to know other dogs in a well-known way. cats are reputed to be the cleanest animals in our environment, but this is more about their efforts, rather than their capabilities. in fact, they bury the results of their vital activity with their paws in the tray, and then wash their paws with their tongue and so on in

a circle. i hope the questions about the sterile cleanliness of pets are closed. legislators did not simply introduce the rule banning pets from visiting grocery stores. yes, but by the results of the public discussion, which took place on the national legal portal. people asked to make sure that there are no animals in grocery stores, and allergy sufferers are a separate group here. in order for an asthmatic with a dog hair allergy to experience a suffocation attack, it is enough for him to bring home one or two hairs from the dog’s back. these hairs, even from a dog in the owner’s arms, fly and settle on objects within a radius of 10 m. and a person. with a dog in his arms he walks not in a 10-meter patch, but throughout the entire area store are allergy sufferers required to prepare for grocery shopping as if it were a mortal battle? the proposal to create separate stores for those who do not want to be close to animals was actually heard

online this week, as well as calls to limit access to hypermarkets for parents with small children, because the kids are noisy and often capricious. once these thoughts were born. several heads have collected a couple of dozen likes, which means they deserve to receive an answer. following this logic, you need to separate the markets for men and women, separately for those who use a wheelchair. for some, the ramp gets in the way. with this approach to division, god knows what we can end up with. but the main thing in our constitution is that a person is the highest value of the belarusian society and state, and a rise in the birth rate has long been declared one of the priorities of national policy. no one in this country will ever limit the rights of people for the sake of the imaginary comfort of even the most wonderful animals. no one here will ever equalize the rights of children and pets or driving allergy sufferers into ghettos without hair, but for keeping dogs here, as

in all civilized countries of the world, you have to pay taxes. from january 1 of this year , the owner of a dog of a regular breed must contribute 11 rubles. 90 kopecks to the treasury. once every 3 months. owners of potentially dangerous dog breeds must pay 59 rubles. 60 kop. article 310 of the tax code allows. the local council of deputies to reduce the amount of collection, but not more than twice. the minsk city council used this right to set the tax rate for owning dogs of potentially dangerous breeds - 37 rubles. according to data for last year , there were about 10,000 officially registered dogs in minsk. even if we consider that all the dogs in the capital of non-dangerous breeds, the owners pay almost 12 rubles per nose, multiplying them by four blocks and by 10.00 dogs. the income from taxes for keeping dogs

seems large only to those who have not seen the expense. the total amount that belarusians contributed to the budget through the fee for pets in 2021 was 1,812 thousand rubles, in 2022 1,854 thousand rubles. and the costs of working with animals in minsk alone. draw about a million rubles annually, money is needed to maintain services for catching stray animals, and this means salaries for several teams of employees, maintenance of enclosures, purchase of injections for disposal at cattle burial grounds. sounds awful? yes, the consequences of human irresponsibility are almost always terrible: dogs and cats do not end up on the streets on their own, people throw them there, and you need to be able to face this truth. money is needed for additional cleaning services. and yards, especially after winter. on in words, all dog owners, the very decency and responsibility, in fact, the yard

after the first thaw is like a minefield, housing and communal services employees have to clean up all this stuff. in addition, funds are needed for the construction of walking areas. perhaps there are not as many of them in belarusian cities as we would like, but they are being built and they are trying to equip them in a variety of ways. and here too there is a nuance. as i said above, about. 10 thousand dogs, but in reality there are tens, or even hundreds of times more. the owners just don't they register their pets, some so as not to pay tax and not bear responsibility, others simply don’t know about mandatory registration, but on the site everyone has furry pets. so it turns out that according to the documents there are enough sites, but in fact there are not. to register a cat or dog, you need to contact the one-stop service of your district administration. application for registration and a passport, you do not need to present the pet itself, just indicate its name, color,

height at the withers, breed. the animal will be registered and given a certificate and tag. need a token hang it on the collar; if the animal gets lost, it will be caught and given to the owner. kots with any residential address and dogs that live on private farmsteads are not charged taxes, but after registering a dog living in an apartment, its owner will appear in the doghouse. new expense item. of particular importance is the registration of dogs of potentially dangerous breeds. the list of potentially dangerous dog breeds in belarus was approved 23 years ago. there are 40 positions in the resolution so far. for now, because the new law on responsible treatment animals involves a revision of this list and the very approach to dividing dogs into categories. now there are two of them: ordinary ones. potentially dangerous dog breeds. next year, all dogs in the country will be divided into

three categories: the first - ordinary dog ​​breeds, the second - breeds requiring special responsibility, they will be included in the revised list, and the third - dangerous dogs. the latter will include animals that once showed aggression towards humans. the tax for them will need to be paid the same as for keeping dogs from the list dangerous breeds, even if it is a dachshund. an important nuance: the act of aggression must be recorded by an authorized body, that is , there must be a court order or a police report with information that the dog bit someone. another innovation in the law regarding dogs from the list of dangerous. to keep such an animal at home, the owner must complete a special training course at the canine service. not everyone does this; according to the new standards, the dog can be seized from the owner before completing the course, and if he refuses, then forever. new law on responsible

handling animals is so capacious that it will take several hours to disassemble it. those interested can find it on the official legal portal in the “official publication” tab “new arrivals” (date april 2, 2024). i have highlighted the fourteenth article in the law. it allows any citizen of the country to contact the ministry of emergency situations for help in saving an animal if such assistance is associated with a risk to human life or health, that is, now you can call rescuers to get them out of... the cat, because an attempt for an ordinary citizen to do this could result in the cat and the citizen drowning. emchesovites have saved animals before, but not because they were obliged to do so, but because they are good to us. and another good thing in the law is a ban on promoting cruelty to animals and the ability to prohibit people who have been convicted of such offenses and crimes from having

pets, if under an administrative article for up to a year, if under a criminal term. up to 3 years. for cruelty to animals. belarusians are responsible under articles 16-29 and 1630 administrative code and under article 339 of the criminal code of the republic of belarus. remember that all dogs must be walked on a leash, and those older than 3 months and taller than 25 cm at the withers must wear a muzzle. all biological solids. refusal to comply with any of the listed requirements also entails administrative liability; a photo or video taken on a phone can be evidence of a violation. to bear responsibility for those whom we have tamed, but not as children, before the tamed

creature itself, but as adults, before people, who share the same space with you. never forget. that in belarus the main value is human life, the lives of our little brothers are very important, but no one will ever equate people with them, but to use a proverb as old as the world, it is better to see once than to hear 100 times, in this case to see a new law draw your own conclusions about it with your own eyes, i’m marina karaman , we ’ve figured out the main nuances of the new law on animals, everything is clear, see you. belarus charmed them at first sight, first in general, probably, when you get to the republic of belarus, you are impressed by the cleanliness,

first of all, the cleanliness, neatness, having now lived here... 7 years, i understand that this is , in general, the merit of the people, such hospitable people, well, not you always meet people who are ready, well, to give everything to you, such a generous soul, and of course, the beauty of nature, belarus, i was also impressed by these european streets, it’s as if you were in prague somewhere, i really liked it, look at the project a look at belarus on our tv channel.

contacts with german officers should be as productive as possible. mrs. steiner, what happened, we don’t know each other well, but i’m an officer and i’m used to making decisions quickly, marry me, watch the series scouts on the belarus24 tv channel. the news is now live with you.