the core that preserved our people during the great patriotic war, we have a part of it, it is important for us not to lose it, not to break it, on the contrary, to strengthen it, so that we, then our children, our grandchildren, will also be guardians and defenders of our country, his people, his many priests not only

contributed to the great victory through their church services and military exploits, but the collection of funds to help the army and the devastated regions of the country was of great importance. in addition to the tank column, the money collected by the church was the alexander-nevsky isadrila was created. fundraising took place even in the occupied territories. in total , the orthodox church collected 200 million rubles for the needs of the front. everything to bring victory closer. yes, the victory day itself was may 9, 1940. the fifth year fell on the postponed reserve, which was celebrated on may 6, the day of remembrance of st. george the victorious, the heavenly patron of the army.

hello, everything is clear with you about the project with marina karaman! let's talk about complex things

in simple terms. today we’re talking about how many bears there are in belarus and whether it’s humane to shoot them and is it worth living according to the laws of the jungle in the center of europe? go! at night, at the end of august, i lay in a tent on the shore of the beautiful belarusian lake kromon, and next to me they spent the night with a metal spoon in a circle to drum one and the other if a bear came to our camp. according to my calculations, the roar should... have frightened him, this was a period when all the media had already circulated footage of clubfooted people who, in 1923 , decided that it was time to remind belarusians who was boss. bears have been seen on the roads below lida and mogilev, in the village of kovalevo , vitebsk district in dubrovsky and krupchino in the shumilinsky district, in pudino, novogrudok district in nelidovichi near minsk, but when they appeared in barovlyany in a gonoles under zhdanovichi, it became clear that the bears are not afraid of cars or crowds of people. in the village

of ganalez, a mother bear and her cubs swam in a stream, not far from a residential complex and a noisy cafe. i understood that if predators do not hesitate to come to human habitation, then in the nolibox forest. they are at home, not me, and there they are the appearance is a very real scenario, especially since since 2003 the number of bears in belarus has grown significantly; 20 years ago there were about 150 individuals in the entire country. the latest information suggests that about 700 bears live in our forests; their count is organized by the academy of sciences, which also decides whether the population is in danger of extinction. based on her data, the ministry. resources and environment approves lists of rare endangered animals and plants. the red book of belarus is simply an illustrated version of these lists. the red book is planned to be republished in 2025. and now the task of scientists is to count

the animals again in order to decide which species should be kept on the list of endangered species and which should be excluded from it. old ways of counting bears are imperfect. people who live near... the massifs were simply surveyed through questionnaires, where they indicated when and where they met predators. this made it possible to determine the approximate number of bears and determine their habitat areas. now, at the insistence of the ministry of natural resources, the academy of sciences has developed a special method for calculating clubfoot. each hunting organization will count them all on its site. the experience of the huntsman and the camera will help. therefore, the figure will come out more accurate, perhaps, it will show that we have more than 700. “do we have a lot of bears or not enough?” - the scientists will answer, they will determine what number of predators is optimal for each region and for the country as a whole, and decide whether it is time for the bear to leave the red book. until this moment, experts from the academy of sciences did not

think that we had too many bears, and it was not possible to exclude them from the list of endangered species. gathered, but their actual number is still in question. does this mean that talking about shooting clubfoot is blasphemy? does not mean that they are not evenly distributed throughout the country; you cannot assign 10 bears to each section of the forest, give them registration cards and expect them to obediently sit in the permitted place. bears roam the forests; the bulk of these predators live in the vitebsk and minsk regions; in the bressk region, for example, they are not present at all. in places where there are too many bears, they begin to violate the boundaries between bear and human world, and this is unacceptable. we did not treat animals, people were and remain the highest value in belarus, which is why the government several months ago decided to create a group of experts from the ministry of natural resources, scientists, representatives of the ministry of forestry, the state inspectorate for the protection of flora and fauna and the guild of hunters to

decide together in november, the head of the belarusian society of hunters and fishermen , igor shunevich, asked what to do with predators, including bears, after a detailed review of the situation. suggested, if you don’t remove the clubfoot from the red book, then at least allow their shooting where bears have bred and threaten human life. bears are very cute, especially if they are plush or painted. the brown bear, which is found in belarus , is a giant up to 135 cm at the withers. that is, when a large male stands on four legs, he is only 30 cm shorter than the average belarusian woman. now imagine. that he will stand on his hind legs, belarusian bears weigh up to 400 kg, that’s almost six people of average weight or two java motorcycles, only complete with agility, thick skin, sharp teeth, claws, powerful paws and jaws, when such a machine

attacks a person to eat or maim, what are the chances of fighting back, that’s it. the bear is one of the few predators that can kill not because of hunger, but for the sake of curiosity, he does not know pity. if he is not afraid, he will not let the victim go, it is difficult to deceive him, bears are smart and cunning hunters, they can ruin life not only with a direct attack, their presence keeps entire villages in suspense, people are afraid to go out and suffer serious losses when predators they attack livestock, kill dogs, tear up chickens and destroy apiaries, so if somewhere near a populated area a cute bear is persistently hovering around, you need to do everything to prevent compassionate nature lovers from approaching it and report it to... the executive committee, the police or ministry of emergency situations. the authorities will assemble a commission, and if it decides that there is a danger to people, the animal will be euthanized, taken away or shot. yes, the bear is a red book bear, but there are times when this does not matter. if a bear attacks and

is killed, a criminal case will be opened and closed, as soon as it becomes clear that we are talking about self-defense. but even if it doesn’t lead to an attack, any wild animal can be destroyed if... it has the ability to kill or injure a person, a bear that comes to a garden or to the outskirts of a village has such an opportunity, it has, but how do you know if it will kill? people, ask or hope? to his integrity, he is unlikely to respond, and there is a risk that he will turn out to be dishonest, then risk people, confiscate, that is, shoot, and this is spelled out in resolution of the council of ministers number 237 of april 11, 2019 of the year. the structure of the document contains a provision on the procedure for interaction between government agencies when an animal is discovered that may pose a threat to the life and health of people. this provision specifies who should be on that very commission of the rysk executive committee. her powers and the fate of the predator are described depending on the situation. shooting is allowed if the animal

is seriously wounded or poses a threat to the life and health of people. moreover, the document assumes that the animal may die during capture; in this case, it describes how to deal with its carcass. too soulless about the life of a bear, and this is because human life is more important. for those who want to live by the laws of the jungle, we have more than 9.5 million hectares of forest. information about plans to shoot bison is generally pure speculation. some resources attached it to the news about bears and made it sound like bison are now dying out in our country, and someone insidious wants to allow them to be hunted. bison are indeed included in the red book, but hunting them is not prohibited, for about 10 years. this animal has a binary status: there is a main gene pool of the population, and there is a reserve one. this means that on part of the teeth you can hunt. and some are kept for beauty and reproduction. in our country, the bulk

of bison live in belovezhskaya pushcha, osipovichi forestry, the ozyory reserve, in krasny bor of the vitebsk region on the territory of the polestsky radiation-ecological reserve. there are also small herds, like dyatlovsky, with several dozen individuals. all bison in the country are divided into 11 micropopulations, for each of them a legal entity is responsible, as... which owns or manages the territory of their residence, for example, this is a forestry enterprise, its specialists they receive the task: to cull old sick animals from the main gene pool, or to determine how many heads of the herd are larger than the optimal size, to transfer excess old sick animals from the main gene pool to the reserve one, for this, by the way, they also assemble a commission. rejected individuals are available for prey, that is, they are allowed to be hunted. hunters cannot shoot teeth in the reserve. in nature reserves , it is therefore

impossible to accidentally kill a young desired bison just like that, they are always accompanied by rangers, and it is not prohibited to kill culled ones. this enshrined in resolution of the council of ministers no. 708 on the protection and rational use of bison; it also says how to legally transfer bison from the main gene pool to the reserve one. in addition, friendly countries buy our bison to breed them in their reserves. of course, healthy, young ones go for sale. individuals. in may, the first batch of nine heads went to bashkartastan; before that , kazakhstan bought zubrov from us, that is, selling and shooting teeth has long been legal, because the optimal quantity for preservation the population in our country is 1,500 individuals, and we now have 2,616 of them, this does not mean that we can distribute them and shoot from right to left, but there is no reason to be afraid of the imminent extinction of this species. by the way, belarus is a country with an exciting... china is doing things with pandas,

leasing them only to states with which it is ready to do business. we could build the same scheme with the sale of teeth, only to friendly countries. how many individuals, what kind of species are needed in order not to fear for its safety, how should citizens and departments behave in order to maintain balance. in the relationship of belarusians with nature, our legislators will write it down in the country’s environmental code. there is no such document in belarus yet, but its concept already exists. after finalization, it will go through the required stages of approval, and like all documents on which the well-being of our land depends, it will land on the president’s desk. signing by the head of state will mean that the rules of the code will become fat for each of us. but for now these are plans for the future, albeit soon. look in the refrigerator. if there isn't meat products, your outrage over the shooting of large animals is reasonable. but if

there is meat there, then you feel sorry for the animals only in the comments. answer yourself the question: are you ready right now, out of compassion for a predator, to sacrifice the life of yourself or your loved ones? and in belarus there are people who are faced with just such a choice by the proliferating animals. and if this choice is beyond the power of those who judge, it is worth leaving the solution to the issue of wild animals to scientists. remember that in living nature the fight for the right to eat or not to be eaten is always justified, this is there is a working law of the jungle that is still relevant today. i am marina karamany in the relationship between belarusians and wildlife. we sorted it out, everything is clear, see you later.

just like you were holding the book in your hands, you were picking up one piece after another, sniffing at the words on your skin. here are the most important creative works, the most valuable and useful ones - these books. at the books.