a terrible day for the soviet people, june 22 , 1941, found faith in the city of pinsk. without a second’s hesitation, she and her husband joined the partisan detachment. the brave underground woman lost her husband in the first days of the war. he died heroically in battle with the nazis. in

august 1942, at the head of a group of underground workers, she went to work in vitebsk, which by that time was overrun by fascist troops. thanks to the data of the underground soldiers of the military group, soviet aviation carried out precise strikes on ammunition depots and barracks of the nazis, causing they suffer great damage in manpower and equipment. anticipating yours. defeat is imminent, the german fascists are intensifying the fight against the people's avengers, seeking to decapitate the partisan movement. following the denunciation of a traitor, vera falls into the hands of the gestapo, where even under torture she did not betray her comrades, for which she was executed. there is evidence that hitler’s executioners hanged her publicly in the square in vitebsk. vera zakharovna kharuzhie

was awarded the order of lenin and the gold star medal, the order of the red banner, and was also awarded the title of hero of the soviet union. posthumously. hello, on the air of the sas program i am authorized to announce, i am its presenter nadezhda sas , i welcome you, i remind you that this is a program for those who want to better understand what is happening and understand how these processes, events, people will affect the life of the country of each of us. in today's program we will talk about a new level of escalation in ukraine, in nato's preparation for direct intervention and reaction to what is happening as a union state, but. first, we will tell you about the main events

in world politics this week. polish dissident judge thomas schmidt asked for political asylum in belarus. he stated this during a press conference. in minsk. schmidt worked as a judge of the second department of the voivodeship administrative court of warsaw. speaking to journalists, he stated that the reason for this action was his disagreement with the policies and actions of the polish authorities. according to shmit, in his homeland he was subjected to persecution and threats for his political position. he stated that the leadership of poland , under the influence of the united states and great britain, was leading his country to war. previously, the pole worked for various positions in the judicial system and judicial authorities of poland. he also headed the yorotdel on... according to experts, the public departure of a high-ranking judge to belarus will become a serious problem for the polish government. shmita may be followed by other politicians, journalists and public figures being persecuted for their criticism

of warsaw's militant course. last week, chinese president xidin ping made his first tour of europe in 5 years. he staged the production in paris, where, despite the efforts president emmanuel macron, it was difficult to hide the growing contradictions between the eu and china. europeans are not satisfied with beijing’s support for its exporters of high-tech products, in particular electric vehicles, as well as china’s allied relations with russia. a separate subject of controversy is the differences in assessments of the causes and acceptable ways to end the conflict in ukraine. chairman xi, in the manner usual for chinese diplomacy, tried to smooth out the sharp points. angles, but the european tour program itself shows china's increased self-confidence and unwillingness to flirt with the west. immediately after france, the chinese leader went to serbia, which is not a member of the eu at all and refuses to impose sanctions against russia because of the ukrainian events. there, xing

paid tribute to the chinese journalists killed in the 1999 nato bombing of belgrade. then one of the bombs mistakenly hit the chinese embassy building. the president of the people's republic of china directly stated that his country will not allow such incidents to recur in the future. finally, the last point of the route was budapest, where xi met with hungarian prime minister viktor orban, causing heartburn among liberal politicians in brussels, paris and berlin. orban is also known for his friendly relations with russia and belarus, which only emphasizes chinese priorities in world politics. the conservative party of the current british prime minister eric sunak has lost. almost half of the local council seats in england. in total, the conservatives lost 474 seats while labor gained an additional 186, the lib dems received an additional 104 seats, the greens 74. in addition, taking advantage of the failure of the conservatives,

some smaller parties improved their positions. until now the conservatives had about a thousand seats in english councils. the election resulted in the conservatives losing control of twelve councils at the time. how the laborites won a majority in eight. also, mayoral elections were held in english cities, in particular, labor party candidate sadiy kahan was re-elected mayor of london for a record time. during the elections only one the conservative party candidate was able to become mayor. they often say that history is cyclical, especially ukrainian history. recently i came across the memoirs of contemporaries about a figure from the period of the civil war, timon petlyura, whose resemblance to another figure. the psychology of ham, who wants to become a master, the psychology of a small bank accountant and a small journalist, who accidentally became a military commander at the whim of the revolution and cannot come to terms with

the fact that this is just an accident. that this accountant actually believed that he general, otaman, commander of the army, and comically sad. in current realities it is comically sad.

jeffries, who did not rule out sending troops to ukraine, said intervention may be necessary if kiev loses. let's hear direct speech. we cannot allow ukraine to fall if... yes, alexander, please, you have the floor, how to respond to this statement? this does not make it much easier for us because there is no official entry of nato or nato countries into this conflict. in fact, the military, military personnel of nato countries have already take part in. in this conflict, but all these countries and nato as an organization are strenuously portraying their non-participation, so they will

continue to insist on official non-participation, and i think we will see an increasing number of military personnel on the line of combat contact, including number, but this is secondarily, in principle, on the territory of ukraine, and this will allow ukraine to release significant units, well, let’s say, from the transnistrian border, from the belarusian border, yes, andrey viktorovich, but tell me, please, in your opinion, what is the basis

for your confidence that this will not happen, because there is a statement by mr. macron, it is natural that the european union, for the most part, is not ready for direct participation, and quite a lot of people are right-wing in their views , politicians find the courage to declare that this will be a collapse for europe, and so what are the economic consequences of the political crisis associated with it in abundance. states is of course the key task at the moment, but it is not a fact that there will be a majority of votes in favor, although the situation again, in ukraine now it is extremely negative. my confidence is that they are not ready to introduce nato units, not some individual bandits united in sabotage formations, but nato units. here are the leaders of western

states, but firstly, if they are going to get involved in a fight, they never declare it so loudly, that is, those who shout on all television channels that now we will send our troops into ukraine then the russians are not enough it won’t seem like

a fight, they will be crushed, they can lead troops only if the ukrainian units, which are already involved in armed confrontation, if they have some success, then in the development of this success, now is not the point when you can risk your troops, but the third point, the fact is that the ukrainian front will really crumble soon, and it looks like ours has begun. the entry of russian troops into kharkov, in this case, when - if

it begins to crumble, and the ukrainian side has a huge number of problems in various sectors of the front, now very difficult situation, and then how to force those remnants of the ukrainian troops to stand in positions to die for zelensky, so that they do not flee, with this very hope that you will hold out for another day, and tomorrow nato will lead the troops and will save you all, therefore. is already beginning, unfolding before our eyes, and the commander of the ninety-second brigade told british journalists that the probability of russia taking control of the entire donbass is 70%. if the ukrainian armed forces do not stop the offensive on konstantinovka and druzhkovka, then in a few weeks the russian army may be already in neevropetrovsk, kharkov, krivoy rog, say the armed forces of ukraine. but in continuation of your words, andrei viktorovich, i would like to remind you in more detail about the provocative

statements and threats of the west in our story, let’s look together. interest in the ukrainian conflict in the west has noticeably weakened, but in order for the business project to continue to work, public attention to it must be periodically warmed up. and although the europeans themselves are frankly tired of the priority of ukrainian issues against the backdrop of the eu’s internal problems, western officials do not miss the opportunity to once again once again invigorate the information space. so the head of france again admitted the possibility of sending the french military to ukraine. he stated this in an interview with a british publication. macron named two conditions under which this would be possible. the us congress also allowed the sending of military personnel to ukraine, but in general, according to information from foreign sources, on the european continent and in the states they do not want direct participation in the conflict, and no one is ready for an escalation of relations with moscow. behind politicians' statements about the possibility sending troops to ukraine conceals a new round

of escalation, europe is aware of this, so various kinds of anti-russian statements are nothing more than... a method of intimidation aimed mainly at moscow’s partners, but they are not ready to turn away from russia, so the head of china, the country, which received a lot of criticism from western politicians, reproached them for dragging the celestial empire into conflict. as the head of the people's republic of china correctly emphasized, china is not a party to the conflict. the west, on the contrary, risks moving from indirect to direct participation, however, so far only in words: vladimir putin has already warned the west about the consequences of sending nato troops to... ukraine. russia also has weapons that can hit targets on their territory, he added. on monday , the russian army began preparing for exercises using non-strategic nuclear weapons. the country's ministry of defense stated that the maneuvers are aimed at maintaining the readiness of personnel and equipment and are also a response to provocative statements and threats from individual western officials.

the department clarified that the exercises will take place in the near future. missile formations will take part in them. the southern military district, in particular, will involve aviation, as well as naval forces. belarus has also begun testing the strength of the joint regional grouping of forces. during the first stage, reinforced tank and mechanized battalions were withdrawn in the ashmyany and postavy directions. we worked out issues of preventing sabotage and reconnaissance groups from entering belarusian territory and fighting them. in addition, a sudden check was carried out with mobilization and bringing into full combat mode. readiness of mechanized and anti-aircraft missile brigades. the second stage includes working out the use of non-strategic nuclear weapons, which are solely an element of deterrence. the iskander operational-tactical complex and the squadron of sud-25 tactical aircraft are ready to carry out missions as intended.

this inspection will be carried out strictly in accordance with the regulations established commander in chief. during it, everything will be checked. complex from planning, training and use of tactical nuclear weapons. iskander missile divisions and polones operational-tactical complexes will be secretly withdrawn to the specified position areas, where they will work out the preparation, planning and use of actions with special ammunition. minsk will continue to take a position of exceptional peacefulness, but is ready to give an immediate response in the event of any military aggression against us. in belarus. take a set of measures to adequately reaction, there are reasons for this, in particular the increasing military activity in europe. it will be quiet, good, it will be calm and quiet with us. if someone uses weapons against us, we will respond. moreover, instantly, we will not draw any lines. any

aggression and response will be immediate. many people today talk about nuclear and other weapons. which will use, will not use this lukashenko and so on, listen, this is a weapon of deterrence, this is a weapon of defense, no one will go on the offensive with these weapons, draw a conclusion from here. yes, sergey anatovich, absolutely the belarusian leader is right, the motivation of belarus for such actions is clear, be prepared for anything, this is probably the most correct phrase that describes... he is already shouting with all his might: guys, help us, save us, now the belarusian army will capture us, please, well, i i will once again emphasize what

the president of the republic of belarus said, that verification of the use of non-strategic nuclear weapons is exclusively defensive in nature, belarus and russia are not going to attack anyone, this is solely a deterrent for... military personnel, they use not defensive, offensive weapons, therefore, but poland, it always appeals,

it is already accustomed to being under the umbrella of the united states of america, appealing to the united states of america in order to further escalate tension in our region, and, well, to receive benefits for yourself, first of all. but tell me, please, we started the program with the blitz question, in your opinion, will it come to the open participation of western countries in hostilities against russia, well, it probably

exists, i would estimate it to be less than 50%, now they are looking for weak points in the psyche, so to speak, or something like that, in the characters of russian and belarusian politicians, all the time. are throwing up some kind of provocations, then the french are talking about something, the british, the united states of america and so on, they are looking for weak points in our psychological defenses, and they want us to, uh, either get scared, or twitch, and so on further, it is unlikely that they will succeed, but the task is for a strategic victory over russia, the destruction of russia as the main competitor ideological, moral authority, everything else, this task remains, questions are superimposed on the internal political situation, very unstable, very tense in

the united states of america, in britain, that is, there are a lot of factors there, the desire to defeat russia, to destroy it exists, but of course they will balance this desire with its own capabilities, however, in history it often happens that -

countries, but the actions of these political characters, yes, with whom i was quite familiar during the time of my, my work in ukraine, it would be instant suicide and personal, well, even the fate of igor kolomoisky shows that now this regime is so, how to say, matured and has crossed all the red lines, that these oligarchs and former or current... second-level politicians have to fear for their own skin, that’s me i think the main motivator of their actions. thank you very much, andrei

viktorovich, this is one of the reasons we... in ukraine knew well what exactly modern russia is, and so are its leadership, and they would study it in detail on the contrary, that’s why there are a lot of people the red lines would not have been crossed by the ukrainian side, because for a long time i had the impression that for a long time the ukrainian side lived in a kokan of illusions

that they themselves... themselves formed, a feeling of impunity that grew over many, many years with each new trick, they seemed to be confirmed in the veracity of these illusions, well, as a result, they led their country and their people to actually renewal, that is, to what is happening now, when perhaps more will pass six months or a year and ukraine will already exist. will not, but russia also had a moment when , instead of interacting in different directions at different levels with different segments of the population, for some reason the interaction was concentrated, concentrated on several figures, literally dozens of oligarchs, it was believed that these were people with sufficient power to stop the brown plague, but it turned out that this is also and then a question for you...

there is a mistake, we believe that if we offer any favorable conditions for foreign trade, for interaction, investment, this in itself should sort of solve the problem, but we offer favorable conditions, exactly the same mistake is made, in my opinion, in working with europeans, when we offer obviously profitable solutions to the same germans and other countries of the european union, but decisions are made not based on the interests of their people, their capital, their state, based on political

expediency, therefore... many decisions are made to the detriment of their own countries, well, what we see now with the european union decides everything, the political interest of washington, well, let’s call a spade a spade, it does not coincide with the objective interests of brussels, for example, other european countries, and there is a certain contradiction with the interests of london on the territory of ukraine. if we are talking about something that was beneficial to the capital of the ukrainian large oligarchs, then after the coup d’etat of the fourteenth year, when ukraine was deprived of state sovereignty. all those local figures who could be called business sharks of the ukrainian format, they began to look like shrimps against the backdrop of the megalodons of transnational capital and they will simply be eaten, they no longer solve anything, they will simply be removed as a class, they have carried out, the most important thing is that they have carried out the initial accumulation of capital, that’s all, they are all small they cleaned it up, now it’s their turn, the same kolomoisky, who was considered unsinkable, akhmetov, they will all go under the knife. thank you

very much, then the question arises: many understand that ukraine as a state in its current form is doomed, but at the same time there is understanding that in some part of the territory that is today called ukraine, it is unlikely that there will ever be a third of tricalories. sergey anatolyevich, here is your forecast of what will happen in these territories, will there be a chance to build another ukraine there with adequate.

a state that will be friendly towards the republic of belarus, and of course towards the russian federation, well, much to my regret... in my opinion, here is the collapse of the soviet union, it played such a cruel joke on our ukrainian friends who did not managed to understand all the complexity of that moment and the prospects of opportunity that resulted in this, let’s say, well, let’s call it a competition of ambitions, political ambitions.

ties that have developed between ukraine and belarus. yes, sergei anatovich, you know, they were talking about ukrainian oligarchs, some of them are already ex-oligarchs, i remember the characterization that some gave to yanukovych, that he sat down with

the grandmasters to play chess, in fact he only knew how to play chepaev , well, this is such a tragic fate. iskandar aminovich, my last question for you is, do you think that negotiations between... allies, to frighten your strength, this requires action, then there will be, then there will be an opportunity for negotiations, and so now we just see what is going on in parallel with the war, a real terrible psychological war between

the west as such and different players who are playing different games both russia and belarus, this is very important, well, we continue our discussion about escalating the situation around ukraine from the outside nato, and i’d like to draw your attention to a recent quote from one of... members of the european parliament no to macron, no escalation of the war in ukraine, not a single italian or european soldier should go to fight in ukraine, we must find a political solution to the conflict, no more weapons, such a

social media campaign in italy was launched by a member of the european parliament, a member of the largest faction of the european people's party, mateo gazini, so i'm glad that i have the opportunity to communicate. with mr. gazine, so he writes me hysteria in in europe, there are no weapons - this is one time, and there are no people willing to fight for other people's interests on ukrainian soil. andrey viktorovich, you will agree that a certain push is expected, at least a reboot of the political system, elections to the european parliament are coming, they are trying in every possible way to eliminate those who disagree with the course, and the chosen course. european union, politicians, but at the same time they are fighting and behaving quite confidently, and there is even a certain consolidation. we have a lot of hopes for the upcoming elections, and we see

individual examples of european politicians who oppose getting involved, dragging european countries into a military adventure, this is completely common sense, this is the language of common sense, but for now i hope. that this will seriously change the situation and somehow influence people like macron, who seems to have already decided everything for himself in terms of starting to unwind the military adventure, but... this hope is not enough, because there is still no consolidation all healthy forces, they act alone, they make single statements that receive such resonance solely because they they still contrast very strongly with many of the alarmist statements, in this regard, people like macron, they are going to continue the armed confrontation, it is beneficial to them, it brings them certain dividends, it allows them to divert attention. voters from problems with the economy within these countries to the external

circuit, and even taking into account that macron is behaving cowardly, just remember the story of how he was going to come to ukraine , promised, then got scared, declaring that no, i won’t come, because what a little bit on me they were preparing for an assassination attempt, or rather, after that he said that yes, i would come, but only as part of a large european delegation, if the heads of other countries would go, well, you see, they crushed the european leader. the composition of the new us military aid package

to ukraine, sergey anatolyevich, according to former cia analyst larry johnson, the new $61 billion aid package to ukraine will not change the situation on the battlefield. most of the allocated funds will go to the american military-industrial complex to purchase weapons for the us arsenal. kyiv will be allocated a small share of the announced money for the purchase of military equipment from the states, he noted, and... in this package

, in the internal political struggle that was in the united states of america, it was not for ukraine, it was to a lesser extent for ukraine, internal political issues were decided more tasks between republicans and democrats on the eve of the presidential election, well, no wonder, any assistance from the united states was always spent 80-90% on themselves.

around the president of ukraine, in addition to the allocation of the largest aid package to ukraine for $620 million, the uk also announced, it will include, in particular , stormshadow missiles in the european union , additional supplies to kiev, system patriot and sampt are being discussed. what do these numbers say? this suggests that the military-industrial complex must be confident that it will have orders for the next few years, and this is exactly what they were trying to achieve. so that they can conduct their planned economy and plan for the future, it

is very important for them to have ukraine as a reason for allocating money for the development of weapons, and for them guarantees are needed, and for them there would be a jackpot in general, if it were possible to intimidate russia with such aid packages, promises to send troops, etc., so that russia would agree to any negotiations on preserving at least some part of ukraine under the control of the west, and the states will agree to give these... to the black sea, this is all designed for, for russia's progress in this regard and...

the baltic countries, these groupings of troops are equipped with modern strike weapons and are capable of delivering high-precision strikes on targets on the territory of belarus and western regions. the corresponding tasks are currently being tested:

the strategic bomber aircraft of the us air force are being used, which regularly fly in europe. continental region. for example, four american b-1b strategic bombers are stationed in spain , practicing the technique of bombing nuclear charges, including on the territory of our country, and are training to use nuclear weapons. this is a response to those who howl beyond our borders, especially the fugitive ones, criticizing us for we have placed here with... our nuclear weapons, so they are training, yes, andrei viktorovich, well, indeed, even if europe has the prerequisites for a more peaceful position towards ukraine, pressure is exerted even by the number of military personnel of the united states of america , so just

a step to the left, a step to the right, yes, it’s clear that there is actually a small number of these military men there, in principle, they’ll be dispersed or flattened out if they start. serious armed conflict, in this regard the americans can of course transfer additional contingents, but this is a difficult logistical task that the american military has been practicing there over the past two decades as a result of exercises, and so far they have not achieved perfection, but in my opinion it is not very correct to consider that europe has been crushed just like that from all sides she follows in this celestial direction because she cannot, she has no internal unity, she cannot resist the pressure of the united states, and look at macron, this is a man who is suppressed by the will of the united states, it is clear that he is an adventurer and he is playing his own adventurist game, in this regard , now there is a certain consensus there, where the united states, the so-called

white house regional committee, the washington regional committee, is playing a major adventurist game and speculative, by the way, and many the leaders of the so-called independent european countries are also trying to develop some kind of speculative game under this umbrella, that is, they are all engaged in speculation, here is that budget, that aid to ukraine in the amount of more than 60 billions of dollars, the scheme was very well described, let’s bring it back, please, colleagues, once again, so that we have it before our eyes, yes please, this is a mill, this is the scheme that was described.

pay attention, here's another thing? after all, this assistance is not gratuitous, as the great one said, they understand this, this money is recorded as a debt to ukraine, as a result they were driven away, they returned back to the american budget, well , a significant part returned there through taxes that will be removed from the industrial complex, that’s the debt full volume fell on the budget of ukraine. and this is the accumulation of these debts, which in the future will lead to the fact that if some part of ukraine survives, there is a definite chance . illusory, then it will be divided up by these creditors who will come and declare the rest of ukraine bankrupt, part of the money is still

a loan, but there is an insignificant part, but in general, of course, this is a mill or, in fact, laundering money, public funds that remain outside the budget of the united states of america, you see in your pockets ukraine has turned into a big one, and some of the crumbs, of course, will go to the regime in ukraine. well, i can’t help but pay attention to the recent publication in which boris johnson’s former chief adviser, dominic cummins , said: “this whole ukrainian, corrupt, mafia state has essentially deceived us all, and as a result we will all end up.” in the ass, i don’t know if this can be said on air or not. kamens argues that the west failed to send russian president vladimir putin a valuable

signal that would have deterred him from invading another country. what a lesson we taught him, the lesson we taught putin is that we are a bunch of damn jokers, he said, noting that the war showed the whole world what clowns we are. andrey viktorovich, just bravo, for the first time i want to applaud. politics, yes, which is in the uk, for honesty in the first place, yes, an epiphany has begun, indeed, because it is impossible to hide reality for a long time, in this regard, what is interesting about this statement, it is interesting primarily because part the political elite of western countries, which had previously been alarmist and now , right now, is beginning to realize that they , too, have been taken advantage of. and that they are also manipulated. what is britain's role in the conflict in ukraine today? well

, the role of britain is really very high, and under its control, the british intelligence services are mainly the office of the president and the main intelligence department, there is a certain division of influence between washington and london, but under washington , to a greater extent, the sbu for the cia, the same zaluzhny - it’s still more like an american client. degree, and there are certain grievances from this, because london would like to start this fire in order to create, as they tried to create such a bloc of britain, poland, ukraine, in order to control the territory from the baltic to the black sea in the future, how to be the leader of this buffer between russia and the european union, control energy flows and so on. now we see that washington’s opinion is very influential, so to speak, all these conversations, and... a truce about a meeting there of some kind of public in switzerland, which will insist on peace negotiations, says that they need, they need a freeze

of the conflict, they need to leave a significant part of the territory of ukraine under their control, they are not going to take money, all these loans that are issued for ukraine, they openly talk about it, what and for what they are issuing, for resources, the territory of ukraine will be taken, the subsoil will be taken, they have practically already carried out an inventory, described who needs what, how... in this scheme, but still, as if washington is following an already beaten path,

they are trying to form coalitions, trying to hold, it means that in switzerland there is some kind of forum on zelensky’s peace initiatives, this is more of a cover, this is more of a cover, this is more gaining some time, because for the usa this time is especially important for biden now. now we have an absolutely legitimate reason to talk about who we are negotiating with, and in principle, what kind of negotiations with ukraine can we talk about if

ukraine is just a board in this chess game. only the language of force, that’s force, somehow it’s not sad, it’s necessary to demonstrate it and negotiate with them from these positions, yes, you see, andrey viktorovich, i agree with alexander’s opinion, at the same time i understand the position of the russian federation and the leader of the russian federation there is no trust in vladimir putin’s federation, it has been destroyed, so the negotiation process, it rather remains only in our dreams and desires of people who call for

peace and try to minimize it in every possible way. the number of victims, but still this is the fate of ukraine and its choice, the choice of its leadership, whether to sacrifice all ukrainians, yes, or not to sacrifice every time thank the united states for weapons, we are not asking you for soldiers, we are ukrainians ourselves who are fighting , but thank you very much for your weapon. i would like to end our program with the words of the member of the european parliament representing germany, maximilian kra, one of my sons is 21 years old, and this is the ideal age for meat, he was 10 when his mother died, now i imagine how he is drafted: he undergoes little training and arrives on the eastern front poorly prepared, and then he is dead, but i don’t want that, the same words can be found to justify every war, i despise those who send young people who have their whole lives ahead of them to go to war for some of their interests, i will not sacrifice my son for this, and anyone who thinks that they find this acceptable can safely vote for any warmongers, we

do not want that at all, we need those who retained his humanity and does not want to send. it seems to me that these words give any sane person goosebumps and imagine his son howling, it is unclear for what and whose interests and rustling bills in his pockets, i think you agree with me that this is of course unthinkable, yes, it’s true , it turns out that colossal money is made from blood, when there are no more ukrainians in ukraine, nothing will stop these nato military men. who are now supplying tools to destroy these ukrainians, just take these territories, that’s it there will be a colossal tragedy ahead, it will be inevitable if it is not stopped. thank you very much, sergey anatolyevich, final word on today’s program, please. despite the fact that a very serious effort continues, this means that this is an attempt to drown out sensible voices in european

countries, but nevertheless it is becoming more and more important. more voices are making their way in the european parliament, in other parliaments of european countries, who are trying to convey the truth about this conflict about its very sad, possible sad outcome that could involve europe in a serious, even nuclear war, and i am convinced that together with these voices with others... that means facts, and these are elections that we have seen and other forces are already winning, the process of political politics is beginning, even if it is only in its infancy reconstruction of europe, and this gives a chance for optimism. thank you very much, alexander, your field is kiev, mine, dnepropetrovsk, do you think there is a chance for you and me

to return home? well, these are... dreams, i think, dreaming is not harmful, and i want to believe in it, that kiev will be liberated, along khreshchatyk columns of liberators will pass, there will be a second liberation from nazism, there will be, victory will definitely be ours, thank you very much to all participants in the discussion, we will conclude with this, as conclusions i will resort to another assessment of simon petliura, this time from the writer konstantin paustovsky, with petliura everything seemed deliberate and... chauvinists who crawled out of dusty holes in huge numbers, the power of petliura’s ukrainian directory looked provincial, the once brilliant kiev turned into an enlarged shpola or mirgorod, petliura’s departure, just like hetman’s departure, there was a feeling of complete uncertainty about the future and a vagueness of thought as if it

was said about today’s ukraine. thank you, that's all, it was a program. authorized to declare. the union state is forced to prepare for the scenario of direct nato intervention in the ukrainian conflict. tv channel belarus 24 broadcasts for you around the clock, don’t switch. our daily task is to talk about belarus in the country abroad. more than 100 million viewers worldwide have access to watching projects from our tv channel. so what is it like, belarus? business and developing, hospitable, bright and

festival. generous, picturesque and monumental, sportive and team. we tell you not only about significant events. we introduce you to active, energetic and inspiring people who live in belarus and do everything for its development. belarus can be different, to

understand and feel it you need to see it with your own eyes. hello, dear tv viewers, the belarus24 tv channel is on air. watch us every day, because we are making belarus closer. this belarusian strawberry is known among

the elements of the intangible cultural decline of belarus.