rector of the russian academy alexander ryzhinsky. the project days of spiritual culture of russia is multi-genre, so in the fay of the academy of music an exhibition was opened at the navadevichy monastery, reproductions of ancient icons made by famous masters in the armory, images of frescoes of the 15th century and objects related to the life of famous nuns of the monastery were presented. of course, a lot of attention has been and will be paid to the formation of a personal culture and the formation of a unified spiritual and educational one. cultural connections. on the reservoirs of minsk aimed specifically at strengthening our region, preparations are underway for the swimming season. rescue station divers are cleaning the bottom and preparing safe locations for vacationers. coastal areas of the water area get rid of garbage that has accumulated over the winter period. special attention to putting

things in order on the beaches; gazebos have already been updated and restored, new barbecues have appeared, and the coastal sand has been cleaned with special machines.

talk show in essence, today we will talk about entrepreneurs about what awaits them in future, well, there will be changes soon, and you probably already know about it, alena syrova and kirill kazakov work in the studio, if you want to join our conversation, please point at the qr code that popped up at the bottom of the screen with your smartphone and join to our chat, you can write questions or any comments there, if you want to know how the film crew lives behind the scenes, then, in fact , subscribe to our telegram.

this story began in the nineties, we remember what was happening in the country, in the world, in general, yes, in the post-soviet space, these are empty shelves, this is an absolute absence, so to speak, of some kind of legal culture and so on, and in order to fill, to solve these immediate problems, there was such permissiveness, yes this is even such a principle, everything that is not prohibited, everything is allowed, that is , i seem to be elementary, to give people the opportunity to survive, to occupy themselves absolutely correctly,

and so on and so forth, no, this was just the third thesis, the third , so to speak, factor, which is really the first factor the fmd, the state control committee, the fiscal authorities raised the fact that in many business structures, especially individual entrepreneurs, they were used in various laundering schemes in terms of cashing out, this is the first factor, by the way, law enforcement agencies should solve this problem, at least fly-by-night company. the second factor is the issue of tax collection. your eyeliner says that yes, the state cared about money, this is bad, but what’s bad about it, we have a socially oriented state in order to to ensure precisely the social aspect, military security, security completely, it is necessary to really collect taxes, when one entity, so to speak, or on

average, some sector of business pays taxes several times, tens of times less than other entities that are engaged in similar type of activity, this too. ok, so i’ll summarize, the first is the use, someone calls tax optimization, in fact it was really a fraudulent scheme, yes, that is, it’s close to optimization, so to speak, the horse was not lying down, the second is really from the point of view of tax collection and equal conditions, and the third is really, that is, when economic entities, moreover , not only public private, but private private, that is, ips, oh, odoo, they .

they are scaring us with the soviet union, this is the most popular story, the second thing is, well , really, that there is not enough money, we suddenly suddenly decided to collect everything that they had from individual entrepreneurs, this is the second quote that comes from extremists: they take everything. kirill, well, no reasoning. there is enough money, you understand, there is always not enough money, here we are, ordinary people, like any other ordinary person, people plan their expenses, they would like more, that’s why there is not enough money, as usual, to meet those demands. which we can assume, which we would like to implement, the budget is actually not much different, if we simplify like this, let’s see, we have something to build, yes, we need to put in order, roads, infrastructure, and the question here is that there is enough money, we need to take it from someone,

the question is what needs to be done fairly participate in the financing of government expenditures, yes, well , the wording here is a bit complicated, but nevertheless it is necessary to make... to make a feasible contribution, many entrepreneurs pay, a lot or a little, it’s also a relative question, if we look at the absolute figures, we did something like this analysis, about a billion rubles in various forms that entrepreneurs exist, there with different taxation regimes, about a billion rubles a year the country's budget received from this category, it seems that this is in year yes, sorry, this is not an individual entrepreneur, this is a small average. individual entrepreneurs in different forms, yes, there are classic individual entrepreneurs, there are about individual entrepreneurs, yes, we have the latest ones, a billion rubles, absolutely, it seems like a lot, yes, but if we look relatively, this is only two and

a half percent in the consolidated budget, from no, from income to the budget, from income from the canalized budget and a small percentage of income from the local budget, if we compare with the figure.

we have mechanisms for deducting relevant expenses, you can confirm expenses, please, you can’t, there is also a simplified procedure there, so everything is not so bad.

nothing changes, and the tax burden in our country is not the highest; let’s take the income tax rate for employees at 13%. entrepreneur , the income tax rate on income from activities is 20%, while the entrepreneur has the right to take into account expenses, or if he has small expenses, he has the right to apply the 20% standard. thus, the actual withdrawal will never exceed 16%. in many western countries, income rates reach 50-70%. we have read a lot that a number of citizens are renouncing their citizenship.

tax per month, i understand perfectly well that i sometimes earn from 2 to 300 dollars a month, this is a small salary, now they want to take 300-400 rubles from me. this is a question, let’s say, maybe not very deep into this law, but a philistine one, that is, you are talking about not just fiscal history, but here people say, well, they will take more from us, we are now paying 100 rubles, we will pay 400 , otherwise more, well, i’ll emphasize again, well, really that's not really what the law is about.

a call comes in, they clarify whether you will be there or not, yes, when they find out that you will be there, they ask you to bring cash with you, he says, here is the card, yes, i say, don’t take the card, bring it in cash, here, well, this is probably it just the same, and what are you doing, i say, excuse me, i, i’m uncomfortable with cash, i, i say, i say, i’m trying, and what happened to you, something broke, something broke with you doesn’t work, sometimes the cash register, you know, they take it out from somewhere and turn it on.

with full payment of taxes, tax authorities all over the world they are fighting and controlling and are forced to do this in various ways, there and remotely.

was discussed in parliament was discussed, another thing is that indeed, even i have a question, why was it not adopted in the package, that is, this is nonsense, moreover, when you look at truly positional experts, they say that entrepreneurs are stuck, we don’t know , the further, that is, there is a list, but we have to do something by october, tell us, that’s what it is, why we can’t know who we have now individual entrepreneurs, we had so many of them, or you know which one, this is also you again... on the vastness of our internet he says: this is because the authorities want to completely close those individual enterprises that are engaged in trade, and force individual entrepreneurs there to maximum engage in some services, but in general the entire business should be engaged in production? well, in fact, this is not entirely true, let's start in order and say that today individual entrepreneurs cannot carry out all

types of activities, so this is such an extreme it’s a misconception when theses are heard that today an individual entrepreneur can do anything. and tomorrow they will only be able to do some part, and today there are restrictions in the legislation, yes, that is, there are a number of types of activities that a priori can only be carried out by legal entities, there are types of activities that have internal conditions that apply to activity, they actually exclude the possibility of an individual entrepreneur to carry it out, but let’s say there is a certain type of construction work, it can only be carried out if there are five certified specialists, we know that our individual entrepreneur is 1 + 3, which means that, indeed, colleagues here have already said that no one hid the work on the lists itself, last year it was so widely directly published and open throughout the country, yes dialogue

platforms were organized in all regions, this time, the second, a list of activities were reviewed. within the framework of public advisory councils under all bodies and republican government bodies, plus more such a large-scale confiscation took place, so this is a logical question, if all this is so widely accepted, why wasn’t it accepted, look, there are points that, well, these are the ones we agreed on today, that we will not speak in technically complex language, but there are points that we, well, actually in our rule-making process are somewhat limited until the government has the official competence to accept.

gi smin economics smin economics, government body that supervises, they announced the figure 40,000, so 40,000 will suffer as a result, where the hell is this, why is this, why make a wave, where are these 40.00 from, you say everything is fine, your colleague says everything is fine, and the ministry of economics, your colleagues say 40 thousand will suffer and

lose their jobs , colleagues, we did not say that 4000, we did not say that 40, we did not say that 4000 would suffer and lose their jobs. we said that when we were asked to evaluate, yes, well, these supposed effects from the list, yes, we evaluated the starting list, this is the starting list, it’s not in in no case can it be considered as a final list, because this is now a list at the level of interdepartmental approval. when we look at this starting list, we understand, taking into account the statistical information that we have, that there are approximately 4,000 individual entrepreneurs. .. today they declare their type of activity as the main one, which will not be included in this list, but at the same time, an individual entrepreneur can have more than one type of activity, 2, 3, 4, 5,